RADIOAugust 05, 2024

6 Ways the Media is ABUSIVELY Lying to America

Politicians have lied forever. But now, our supposed "friend" and "ally," the mainstream media, is pushing the lies too. Glenn lays out how the media's lies are actually a form of mental abuse. Glenn reads an article from The M3ND Project, which provides resources for people hurt by abuse, that lays out 6 kinds of mentally abusive lies: black lies, white lies, half-truths, broken promises, forgetting, and denial. "Hard to know if that was an abuse site you were reading from or an internal Democratic campaign strategy memo," Glenn's co-host, Stu Burguiere, says. And just like any abusive relationship, the media's goal is the same: "power, money, status, or control."

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So, Stu, I found something on themendproject.com.

This is a place that helps people get away from mental abuse and physical abuse. And now I'm only reading it, just because, you know, I'm not tying this to anything. Because somebody said to me -- I read it here at home. My wife was like, I think I see what you're saying.

I said, I'm not saying anything. I'm talking about mental abuse. I'm talking about people unlike the people broadly in the United States of America. Being mentally abused. I'm just talking about people who are in a situation and need to get out. Okay.

Make no mistake -- this is from an abusive -- get away from abuse website. Make no mistake, lying is a type of abuse. We all lie sometimes, don't we? So when is it abusive?

Lying is one of the most common tactics an abuser uses to gain power and control over their victim. Lying confuses the victim's reality, while helping the liar to shrink from their responsibility in the situation.

Often shifting the blame to the victim. Bosses, significant others, friends, family, may use lying as a form of covert emotional abuse. Lying also paves the way for other types of abuse, such as physical abuse. While everybody makes mistakes, or even little lies. But they can quickly culminate into full-on manipulation of a person or situation. A central element to covert abuse is stressful confusion. You have an example maybe of that, Stu?

Stressful confusion. This is the emotion abusers want their victims to feel when lying to them. The covertly abusive tactic of lying, increases the victim's anxiety levels and their thinking to become clouded.

A confused victim is less likely to respond quickly, to go with their gut or confront the liar.

You know, that's the opening. Now, let me give you a few. And see if you can find any examples. I know you're not abused, Stu. But maybe you know somebody who is being abused.

Black lies, one. Black lies are bald-faced lies the abuser uses to gain something for themselves, at the cost of the one being deceived.

Think, for example, of a realtor who lies about the condition of underground plumbing into a home to get a higher price of its sale, and thereby gains a better commission. In other words, the realtor exploits the buyer's lack of current knowledge out of self-interest.

Similarly, a common lie used by abusers is, I deposited the check. However, if that check was deposited, into the abuser's personal account. Instead of the joint account.

The abuser has gained financial power over the victim. If the check was never deposited, the perpetrator then gains power of confusion.

And anxiety, when the victim wonders where the money went, or if the money ever existed to begin with.

Upon further inspection, some of these deceptions can be identified. However, at their core, these lies are statements used by abusers to gain something over the victim. Power, money, status, or control.

I'm sorry. You probably don't relate to any of this, Stu. Because I'm just talking to people who are being abused.

STU: Right.

GLENN: White lies. Everybody knows this type of deception, which is unfortunately common.

White lies are small, seeming dismissive obstructions of reality that are harder to disprove. They're sometimes used for food reasons such as telling a friend you like her new hair cut. When you don't. So you won't hurt her feelings.

Because white lies are less traceable, however, they carry greater power to manipulate others. Their most insidious use is when the abuser tells white lies about the victim to others.

Because those lies slowly influence others to view the victim in a different light.

Can you think of an example?

For an example, during particularly stressful times, an abuser may tell friends and family, that everything is good, we're just fine.

However, the victim's behavior makes him or her appear erratic, unpredictable. And at times, unstable to those close to the couple. Over time, this tactic effectively isolates the victim from others.

Each individual lie might be too small to notice or address it first.

But over time and with repetition. They will successfully shift other's perception of the individual.

Hmm. Three, half-truths.

Half-truths are versions of what happened that helped the abuser to avoid responsibility in a situation.

The liar relies on the fact that they are telling just enough of the truth, to seem credible. For example, recounting a disagreement by saying, he yelled at me, while leaving out the events which led up to the yelling. This omission of important facts paints a picture that is more favorable for the abuser.

Four, broken promises. This form of lying is difficult for abusers to accept, when confronted. They will attempt to give themselves the benefit of the doubt. An abuser who promises to come by your work party, then breaks that promise, by refusing to show up at the last minute is a liar.

They will try to excuse their actions by claiming they had a hard day, or they didn't think you really wanted them to come. Like the white lie, broken promises can make the victim look bad in front of others. Remember, a broken promise is the same as a lie.

Forgetting, similar to broken promises, claiming to forget a commitment or an obligation, such as, oh, I forgot, you wanted me to be home early tonight is manipulation. It can convince the victim that the abuser made a simple mistake.

Constant forgetfulness should not be dismissed. And then finally denial.

Liars are so comfortable with telling lies, that they will do anything to avoid getting caught or taking responsibility. Even if that means, flat-out denying the truth, no matter how obvious it may be.

If someone denies the reality of facts and evidence when presented, they are likely a liar. Remember, emotionally healthy people do not habitually lie. Especially concerning relationships with loved ones. Transparency should be sought after.

Because that's what connects people. A genuinely loving partner, parent, sibling, friend, et cetera. Will not continually lie, and that is what divides people and prevents authentic relationships. Any combination and frequency of these types of lies, should be noted and addressed.

If this blog helps you see the lies, you're facing from a partner or another. Maybe a president -- I just lost my place here. Anyway, thought that was interesting, about how lies are mental abuse.

And gosh, I don't -- I don't know if you saw any use in any of your own life. But if you're constantly being lied to, you should make a concerted effort to avoid that liar because they are manipulating you.

My gosh, I just thought of this. This could be applied to the media. And to the left.

I -- holy cow. Because black lives, white lives. Half-truths. Broken promises. And I forget -- did I say that? I said that.

Huh. Interesting.

STU: Hard to know if that was an abuse site that you were reading, or an internal Democratic campaign strategy memo. It really does describe --

GLENN: Or the press.

STU: Yeah, the press for sure.

GLENN: Yeah. The press.

STU: That's the thing.

GLENN: The one thing about -- politicians lie.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Politicians have always lied, told half-truths. Et cetera, et cetera. The difference here now is it's a -- it's not just a politician.

It's the entire system around that politician.

It's the entire party, around that.

And then it's the one that is supposed be your friend.

If you had a friend, and you found out, they were in cahoots with the abuser, somebody who is lying to you, and they were telling you, it is you. It really is you. No. It's -- anybody who tells you that he's not a good guy, I'm telling you right now, they're part of the problem.

You know, they're probably abusive. You need to stay away from them. Because they'll abuse you.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: That's the real problem. Politicians lie all the time. We know that.

STU: And I don't know. There's something about this era, that makes it more difficult and the lies more toward the black lies than the white lies.

I was listening to somebody. Some analyst talking about this. It was in the realm of conspiracy theories. And they were saying, a lot of people online, that spread conspiracy theories, are more capable of doing it, because there's so much out there.

Like, they will -- they will make some crazy claim. This will happen at noon. You know, and it doesn't happen. But there's so much other stuff going on. So many other claims that person will wind up reading that day, so many other news stories, that in three days, they don't necessarily remember the guy who said something was going to happen at noon, and it didn't happen.

And so we get like immune almost to people making claims and being wrong. We don't discount them anymore.

We don't have that same process. You know, I constantly go back, and it's this antiquated history. But thinking that, you know, John Kerry arguably lost the election for the claim of, I actually did support the 87 billion dollars before I voted against it, or whatever that quote was. That was a big part of that.

It seemed like he -- he just was lying.

He had this stance. And he wanted to reverse it, to win this election. And the American people rose up. Like, that's crazy. We can't vote for a guy that does that.

Now that's so quaint. Like, saying that you voted for a policy.

GLENN: It's like a covered wagon.

STU: It feels like you're on the Oregon trail.

GLENN: Yeah, yeah.

STU: It's insane. And I think part of that is what's happening here.

They -- the media with I think the Trump era in particular, has taken the mask off, and said, we no longer can be this subtle force, leaning on the scale a little bit to push voters toward the thing we want.

It's -- this is too important. Donald Trump is too evil. Conservatives are too bad. We now have to straight-out be activists. We have to be left-wing partisan operatives. All the time.

And it doesn't matter if we just said Kamala Harris was actually abusive to her staff. And couldn't get anything done. And failed on the border.

And as the border czar. We now have to just say, she was never the border czar.

And she's wonderful, and everyone around her loves her. And this is Camelot. And we just have to reverse ourselves. And that's it. We just push through it. And that is a -- it is a -- it's not that much different. In goal. But it is totally different in approach. And it's so in our phase.

And yet, a good chunk of the American people don't see it. Because they don't want to see it. They want to believe their side is right. They want to believe their side is just.

That they're fighting this moral crusade. And so they just go along with it.

And I don't know. Is it going to work? It didn't work in 2016. Joe Biden is currently somehow president of the United States. So I guess maybe it did work in 2020.

Does it work again in 2024? The media did seem to control this election in a way that I didn't think was possible. They got the candidate thrown out. The guy who won the primary, is no longer the candidate. Because largely the media decided to become journalists for two weeks.

GLENN: It was a coup. It was a coup.

It was an orchestrated coup.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And if they can do whatever they want, with the laws and the media and everything else, we know that there's all kinds of plotting and planning. Otherwise, the White House would have said, what they were doing to get all new registered voters. Which was the first one. I think the first executive order that he signed, was an all hands on deck register voters for the next four years.

All government-wide. And they won't disclose what that means or what they have been doing, which is an abuse, again, of our money and of our trust.

But they won't abuse that.

If they can fix the election, they will fix the election. And they will feel justified, because the threat is too big.

The ends always justify the means

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.