RADIO

Why Hunter Biden’s lewd photos & videos SHOULD be reported

It continues to get worse for Hunter Biden. More lewd photos and videos have leaked from the president’s son’s laptop, and they’re VERY scandalous. So, why then does the media continue to ignore it all? Well, many on the left argue that Hunter’s personal life should stay personal. Glenn and Stu explains why that’s a HORRIBLE argument, and why Hunter’s transgressions DO affect the American voter. Therefore, they argue, there’s no reason why the media shouldn’t be reporting it…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: What can't Hunter Biden do and get away with?

I mean, we have him, can we play the -- play the video of him, you know, weighing the crack. No.

It's him. That's a hooker and him. And he's showing this scale.

VOICE: Without the bag.

VOICE: So how long --

VOICE: 2.2.

GLENN: Okay.

STU: This could be part of the problem. He is thinking he is doing 2.07, and it says 20.7. That could be -- maybe the genesis of all of his issues over the past few years. He's doing ten times the amount, he thinks he is.

GLENN: It's -- I mean, honestly, what can he get with?

We haven't found a dead body, but I would like to -- I would like to preface that with, yet.

We haven't found one yet.

STU: Certainly, no one believes all these hookers are alive. There's no way, all of them. Come on. I mean, just statistically, some of them have to be gone.

GLENN: This is incredible. That the mainstream media still is not reporting on this.

Imagine being, just an honest American. And you have no idea, about any of this. Because you watch mainstream media. So you don't know about this. You think it's still a hoax. You know, a Russian trick.

You haven't seen the videos.

I mean, I've seen some of the stuff. It's sickening. He is -- it's sick, what's going on.

And his dad, absolutely knows. His dad is -- his dad sent him $20,000, so he can pay for Russian hookers.

STU: I mean, I don't --

GLENN: Remember what they said about Donald Trump. Oh, he was intent in Russia with hookers. Hunter Biden! That's Hunter Biden!

STU: Yeah. There's one where he seemingly sent him a bunch of money to, quote, unquote, pay for rehab. That, of course, Hunter didn't go to. And wound up spending it on drugs and hookers and the like.

GLENN: Yeah. That's a different. That's a different 20 or 50 grand. This one -- do you have the -- he just pays one of these Russian hookers $10,000. And here's a video, from his i Cloud account. Here's a video of him going down stairs, after apparently, they just had sex. And she's on the phone with someone. And not talking to Hunter. Watch this. You don't have that one yet?

Okay. Well, he comes down. And he says, did I hurt you?

Did I hurt you in any way? Have I ever hurt you? Are there any bruises on you? It is -- it is blackmail-worthy.

STU: Yeah. It's -- look Derek.

GLENN: I can't believe it.

STU: It's funny because we keep -- we've oftentimes made the point, that this is not just a Hunter Biden story. There's evidence of potential ties to corruption, directly to the president of the United States.

GLENN: Potential?

STU: Yeah. It's not proven yet, obviously. No one has looked into it, seemingly, outside of just talking about it. Things like the 10 percent of the big guy. All the way through the election.

And several other things that have gone on through here. We talked about the 950,000 barrels of oil that went to a company tied to Hunter Biden.

Now, there hasn't been a trial. We haven't gone through all the evidence yet. But massive indications, that this stuff should be covered by the media. But the we should point out, that even if it didn't have any of that. The son of the president of the United States, running around with videos of himself, doing all sorts of bizarre things with hookers and crack on camera, is a big story, by itself.

If that were all that it was, it would still be a massive story. I remember hearing about Jenna Bush going out drinking. She -- she may have stood up on a bar. Oh. Wow. My goodness.

GLENN: I remember that. Yeah.

STU: We heard about every time --

GLENN: Look how out of control the Bush family is.

STU: Yeah. Go back to Billy Carter. You go back to Roger Clinton. You go back to brothers and family members. They're -- it's always the story. This is, by far, the craziest story I've ever seen in my lifetime of a relative of the president, what we're seeing here, and it's constant.

GLENN: Well, not only.

Wait. Wait. Let's put this into perspective.

Billy Carter. Jimmy Carter's brother, got into trouble. Because he started selling Billy's Beer.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And Billy's Beer was seen as him profiting off of the presidency. That's nothing compared to selling a million barrels of strategic petroleum, from our reserve, through his son's company. To China!
(laughter)

GLENN: I mean, I don't know. I think there's a problem here.

STU: Yeah. I would say, it rises above that.

And like, even if you want to say, that it's not a big story. It's just Hunter Biden and his personal story, or whatever. That's a total crock, right?

This is absolutely crazy. But let me give you a reason why we should be talking about this. At the bigger media level. With lots of resources, going into what happened here. Because, could this just be some guy, on the right, who doesn't like the Bidens, who is hacking them?

Yeah. Absolutely. It could be. Right? It could be. Could it be some person who is just bored? Could it be someone who thinks they could get a ransom for this? Could it be someone -- just some hacker group that's out there. All these things are totally possible, as to how this i Cloud account was hacked. But let me give you another possible scenario here.

We've given $60 billion to Ukraine. To launch missiles at Russian soldiers, all over the place. Some of which, have landed, reportedly, inside of Russian territory.

We have an opponent, who has said, outwardly, the next world war, starts with ones and zeros. He's threatened 20 use cyber attacks, and we know they have used cyber attacks against us.

It is incredibly plausible, that this is a peace of retaliation by the Russian government or approved by the Russian government.

It's not proven. We don't know. But it's certainly a plausible outcome, when we've sent $60 billion in missiles to Ukraine to fire at Russian soldiers.

So, like, is that not -- does that not even rise to the level of the interest of the New York Times? Or the Washington Post? How can we not be looking at this, Glenn?

GLENN: No, it doesn't. Because the problem is, you can't dismiss this. It could very well be, that the i Cloud was hacked. And given to Russian operatives. It could be. Might not be. But it could be. But you could not dismiss that as Russia propaganda. Because it's real.

STU: It's real.

GLENN: That's it is problem. It's real.

STU: It's real. But we think the hack of Hillary Clinton. It was Podesta's emails back in the 2016 campaign. You know, the reporting on that, indicates that Russians had something to do with that. But it was real. It wasn't made up stuff. These were real emails, that we all were -- became aware of. And that could be the situation here. It's not to say that, look, you would still cover the content of them. But like, it could be a major, we could have seen a retaliation into a war we just got a drawn into. And all the major publications have completely avoided the story. As if it's not worth covering at all. There's a million reasons why they should be doing this. If it's just a hacker group, if it's just someone trying to land a few bitcoins or whatever. It could just be that. Who knows?

But, like, that's an answer we should have. We should at least be chasing after it. And nobody in the media seems to even bother put in a few minutes of effort to figure it out.

GLENN: So here's the -- well, this can't do that. Because they would have to admit, that this is a story.

STU: Right.

GLENN: It's Russian -- and we have to look in. I mean, this is. Let me show you what happened yesterday, at the signing of this few gun law. Yesterday, the president is in the Rose Garden, and he is signing it. And a lot of the parents from Parkland are there. But listen to what one of the Parkland people say, in the middle of the speech.

BIDEN: I'm dealing with gun violence. Because make no mistake --

VOICE: What do you think about Hunter Biden, your son? There's a video of him talking to a hooker about how much crack he has? What do you think about that, Mr. President?

BIDEN: Okay.

Because, make no mistake about it.

GLENN: I mean, right in the middle of something historic, he's asked about this. And why is he asked about this?

Because no one in the press will ask him about this. Let me just show you some of the things that we have. First of all, show the Pedo Peter texts. This goes off. He texted someone named Pedo Peter with a message that says, I love you, pop.

Okay. There's a screenshot of it. It's a message between him, his dad. I think his sister is involved in this.

And his name on his side, is Pedo Peter. Peter is the name. I can't remember the last part. All I can think of is Henderson. Peter is a guy from spy novels. That was a KGB operative. And that's apparently the name that Joe Biden uses with his family.

Can you imagine, Donald Trump, even just doing that. Which is nothing. That's no big deal. That's a code name for the family. But can you imagine if Donald Trump would have used a fictional character's name, that was a KGB operative.
(laughter)
That would be enough.

STU: There would be books written just about that.

GLENN: Right. So now why does -- why does his son call him Pedo Peter? If anyone in my family would call me a pedo, pedophile, I would be out of my mind, crazy. Why does his son think it's appropriate to call his dad Pedo Peter?

Then, let me show you this one. Here's an exchange on what ethnicity and type of woman he prefers. He's negotiating for hookers. He says, girls who are like I am. Distrusting and highly, highly wary of evil.

Wow. You don't know what evil is, dude. And he goes on to describe the kind of women that he likes.

He -- eventually she says, I won't get you Asian women. And he says, no yellow. No yellow.

STU: Wow. That's totally okay. That's not a cancellation moment at all. No problem. No problem, everybody.

You know, and Glenn, like there's a -- you know this -- you've talked about this. Not the exact thing that Hunter Biden has gone through. We all know.

Inside of every guy, there is a path, a series of incredibly bad decisions. All made consecutively. That you can theoretically, there's a dark part of people, who can get yourselves into a room with hookers and cocaine. It's a sad thing to admit.

We try to avoid it. Most of us are capable of doing such things. But there is a path. Right?

You can understand all these things. You understand that people go to the party. Things get out of control.

I don't know. Never had that issue, thankfully. But there's a path for a lot of guys to get there. What I don't understand is all the filming. Why are you filming yourself naked, all the time?

I don't understand. Turn the camera off.

Do something, where a lens is not pointed at your genitals. That's all I'm asking. Spend five minutes without your i Phone in between your legs, pointed at your face and some other stuff in between. It's not natural.

GLENN: Now, think of -- think of how much we have seen from, you know, the sex tapes from, you know, Paris Hilton.

STU: Right. Okay.

GLENN: Kardashian. We've seen the sex tape. Okay. You kind of understand, in some ways, why a guy might take a video with the Kardashians. Okay?

STU: Sure. Sure.

GLENN: Not this one. Because it's focused on him. What -- what is the deal?

And why -- why -- why -- why are you taping you weighing crack with a hooker?

STU: Bad idea.

GLENN: Why are you videotaping you weighing crack? I think I might have an answer for that. We'll tell you in 60 seconds. Stand by. Oh. Remember the good old timey days, when people would go to jail for weighing crack.
(laughter)

Those are the days, when grandma, would bake a pie, and then set it on the windowsill to cool. And nobody in the family called her a C-word. Which is another thing from the -- but that's what he calls Jill.

The first lady.

STU: And you should be calling her, by the way, Dr. C-word. Can we give her the respect that she deserves?
(laughter)

GLENN: Is she a gynecologist?
(laughter)
Okay. I'm just thinking -- paging -- never mind.

It's important to understand how cyber crime and identity theft can affect your lives. We're seeing it with Hunter Biden right now. May I suggest, if you're a prominent person, you might want to take all of that stuff, off of your computer. I'm just saying.

You can't catch everything. They -- they can't stop the hacking, into Hunter Biden's i Cloud, what do you think -- you think they're even working on stopping it for you? No one can prevent all identity theft. Obviously.

But if you have LifeLock, by Norton, you know, maybe they can help.

Hunter Biden, not included. 25 percent off your first year with the promo code Beck. Call 1-800-LifeLock. Or head to LifeLock.com. Use the promo code Beck for 25 percent off. It's LifeLock.com. Ten-second station ID.
(music)
Dr. C-word. Oh. Okay. So what do you think of this? He has -- he kept the audiotape. Do we still have the audiotape, Sara? I think we had it yesterday of dad calling in and saying, hey, look, I think you're all in the clear here? This was -- this was the day after or the night after a New York Times article, came out, about Hunter's shady dealings. And this is the call that Joe Biden made to his son. Listen.

VOICE: Hey, pal. It's dad. It's 8:15, on Wednesday night. If you have a chance, give me a call. Nothing urgent. Just want to talk to you. I saw the article, at least it's been online. One time. It's good. I think you're clear.

GLENN: I think you're clear. Stop. This implicates Joe Biden. Joe Biden said he's never talked to him about any of that. I knew nothing about it. This implicates Joe Biden. He knows about it. And he says to his son, I think it's clear. I think you're clear.

Why would you say that? You would say that, as an insurance policy. I think this guy either knew he was going to get caught. Or wanted to get caught. I think there's this balance. I think the blackmail that's going on here, is with Joe Biden.

The blackmail that's going on. Remember, Hunter Biden was caught on tape saying, my dad will do whatever I tell him to.

If it's a priority to me, it will be a priority to him. Believe me, he will do whatever I tell him to. Well, why would you say that? You're either boasting or lying. Or you know dad is in as much trouble as you are. And you're the key to that.

This is a serious national security risk. And, you know, when we're selling strategic petroleum, from our strategic reserves. To China. Funneling it -- funneling it through Hunter Biden's corrupt corporation. We are in serious, serious trouble.

RADIO

Cabinet Wins, DOGE Audits, Tariffs: Trump's Third Week Has Been WILD!

It's only been 3 weeks of Donald Trump's second presidency and A LOT has changed! Glenn reviews some of the biggest wins that we've seen in the past few days: RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard were confirmed as members of Trump's cabinet, Kash Patel is one step closer to being FBI Director, Trump has called for “fair and reciprocal” tariffs on US trade partners, DOGE is preparing to audit the IRS, and the list goes on!

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let's see what the president has been up to in the last 24 hours.

Does this guy sleep? What's Melania doing for Valentine's Day today?

STU: One thing. When he's the president of the United States, is he thinking about that type of thing?

GLENN: No. He has people think about it. People who have people.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Yeah, people who have people. Usually, maybe like, maybe his son. Like, Dad. Maybe you should carve out a couple of hours tonight.

Oh, crap. I didn't even. You're president. I think I can make a few calls.

STU: I feel like, it's interesting that we just have a president that is awake, like every day. He seems to wake up. We see him places. Have you noticed this? I don't know if you've noticed this at all. But current president of the United States, we see him out doing things. Isn't that weird?

I feel like it's weird.

I don't know about this system we have, where the president is awake every day. It's changing our traditions, Glenn. I'm concerned about it.

GLENN: It is. It is. Well, Barack knows. We have to change our --

STU: That's true. Trump has kind of dropped the hammer on the rest of the world with tariffs. And I kind of like this tariff. Whatever they charge us, we're going to charge them.

STU: Reciprocal tariffs.

GLENN: Reciprocal tariffs. That's fair. We're not going to charge you -- I mean, maybe China would.

But we will not charge you more than you charge us. You charge us something. We'll charge you.

I think that's good!

STU: Yeah, it's interesting. It certainly seems fair. Right? Like, don't fire up.

Because the rest of the world loves tariffs. They love tariffs more than we love tariffs, even though we --

GLENN: I don't love tariffs.

STU: I don't love them at all.

Trump does love them. We've talked to him even in private conversations. By the way, in case you're wondering, is he just saying this just for the cameras? No. He really loves them. He loves tariffs. I don't agree with him on that policy. Though, he's used it to great effect recently.

That being said, I mean, if someone started charging you 100 percent tariff on a particular item, picking that same item and putting a tariff, 175 percent, certainly is fair. Now, of course, the reason we import things typically is because we don't have them here.

GLENN: Right! But not necessarily, like cars. Cars. Europe charges us a 10 percent tariff to send a Ford over.

And they charge -- we charge them 2 percent to send a Mercedes. I mean, what's fair about that?

STU: Now, again, one of the things that's fair about that. Is it's not paying an extra 8 percent on a car. We get a benefit of that, as a consumer.

That if we want to buy a European car, we will pay a little bit less and now we'll pay a little bit more. So there is a penalty to that.

However, it is certainly fair. The word "fair," I think applies when it comes to nation-to-nation relation.

And one of the things we've liked about having these lower tariffs on our side is getting lower prices for our consumers.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: And so they're -- and as Trump has discussed, he's been very up front with us. There will be pain with these policies. But long-term, we think it's worth it.

And that's really where the rubber meets the road.

GLENN: Okay. So now, everybody is very, very upset about Donald Trump signing off on DOGE and the audit of the IRS.

Now, I do have to question your sanity when you're against the audit of the IRS.

STU: You seem to be for audits. You can't audit them?

GLENN: Yeah. Who do you have to be, to be against an audit of the IRS, and bring every single receipt you have! I want to see every receipt. Oh, I want to help them.

STU: By the way, Glenn, I work with you.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: My job is -- and for multiple decades now, has to be -- become closely associated with Glenn Beck.

GLENN: Yeah, it's good.

STU: Oh, the perks. The benefits. Oh, gosh, I can't even count them!

GLENN: Yeah. Hmm.

STU: Yet, somehow, I made it through the entire Barack Obama administration. And the entire Joe Biden administration.

GLENN: Yeah!

STU: Without getting audited.

GLENN: Yeah. Not me.

STU: No. I know. I remember. And yet what about happens two weeks ago? I get a letter with the IRS, with Trump in office. That I'm getting audited.

And I don't know if this is just a parting gift from the Biden administration. How is that happening?

GLENN: That's what I'm saying. Thank God somebody noticed your shadiness. Somebody finally noticed. He's very shady. He's very shady.

You know, the good thing is, both of us stay -- to our accountants, we always say the same thing. Anybody who is preparing our taxes. Stay way away from the line.

STU: Yes. 100 percent.

GLENN: When in doubt, leave it out.

STU: Still, it's incredibly frustrating. We were talking to Alan Dershowitz, I have every single book -- everything -- yeah. Sure. Somewhere, I have every receipt from 2022. I'm sure.

But, I mean, the -- this is this relationship that we have with the government, that is this adversarial torture fest, that we pay for every year. Oh, gosh. I can't wait to pay by taxes.

Maybe I'll get a refund. Maybe they'll give me some of the money that is mine, back to me, multiple months later.

GLENN: I believe that's actually what happened to me.

I believe they owed me money.

STU: After the audit. Yeah.

GLENN: I stayed away from the line.

STU: That's what you have to be.

GLENN: You know, jail time does not sound good to me. In any way, shape or form.

STU: The wrong IRS agent, that doesn't like your show, happens to be doing it, well, guess what happens? They push it beyond the limits of normalcy. So the good senator and common sense-filled senator from Oregon, Ron Wyden said, this means Musk's henchmen are in a position to dig through a trove of data about every taxpayer in America.

Wait. What? You mean like the IRS does?
(laughter)

STU: What core of government function are you guys talking about?

GLENN: No, what's up with that? And it could be the very reason behind possible delays, in people receiving their tax refunds for 2024.

What a scare tactic.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: These guys are so freaked out about Donald Trump. I mean, you know, the one thing that happened yesterday, that everybody should recognize. Mitch McConnell was alone. He was alone.

STU: That's huge.

GLENN: That's gigantic.

STU: On two votes. Tulsi and RFK!

GLENN: I know. I know.

STU: And before this, if McConnell said, hey, this is where I'm going, he would always have a bunch of buddies that would come with him. His closest friends. It would always do that.

GLENN: It's weird, you cut off the money, and things change.

STU: Yeah, he no longer has the leadership. He no longer has control of that cash. All of a sudden, he's a lonesome dove.

GLENN: Yeah!

So let me just ask -- I want to ask, are you tired of winning? Let me just give you the winning streak so far number Congress. Marco Rubio, voted to be confirmed, 99 to zero. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, confirmed, 68 to 29.

Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, seventy-nine to 18. Brook Rollins, Secretary of Agriculture, 72 to 28.

Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy, seventy-seven to 22. Pam Bondi, 54 to 46. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner, 55 to 44.

Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, 59 to 38. Doug Collins Veterans Affairs, seventy-seven to 23. Kristi Noem.

Secretary of Homeland Security, 59 to 34. Lee Zeldin became the EPA administrator 56 by 42.

I have to tell you, Lee Zeldin, there's some stuff he did yesterday, that you're like, holy cow.

STU: Yeah, I have high hopes for the him. He's off to a very good start.

GLENN: Yeah, Russ Vought, who I just absolutely love. Director Office Management and Budget. He's done a lot of incredible things this week. 53 to 47.

John Ratcliff, confirmed as CIA director, 74 to 25. Tulsi Gabbard and RFK were confirmed yesterday. You have Kash Patel who got out of the committee and is going to be voted on early next week. And, of course, you have Pete Hegseth. I mean, and Mitch McConnell, standing there alone, all day yesterday.

This is good. Now, the president did a couple of other things yesterday, that are ground-breaking. But we need to make sure Congress passes all of these things as laws.

And they're not just executive order.

And that's going to require us to keep the heat on Congress. And they're working on the budget.

Congress just put together their budget for next year.

The Senate is squealing like stuck little pigs.

But we need to get them to pass in one bill. And you're going to get some crap in that one bill, I'm sure. But you have -- you really have a hard time, going to get two bills through on reconciliation.

So we need it in one bill.

RADIO

Elon Musk is NOT a Threat to "Democracy." He's a Threat to Bureaucracy

Elon Musk and DOGE are not threats to "democracy," like Democrats are complaining. They're threats to the bureaucracy that has taken over the government our Constitution established. Glenn explains how this all originated with Woodrow Wilson, who dreamed of "freeing" the government from the "chains" of the Constitution and replacing it with a government of "experts" and administrators. That's where the shadow government began and that's what Trump and DOGE are "destroying."

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Elon Musk said, that we're not living in a democracy, we're living in a bureaucracy.

When he said that, my response was, yes. Now, I don't know if you know who Elon. I don't know if you know who Woodrow Wilson is.

But, yes!

Living under a bureaucracy, that's the point. Let me give you the quote, the history of liberty is a history of resistance.

The history of liberty is a history of limitation of governmental power, not the increase of it. Who said that?

Sounds like a guy who understands and values freedom. Somebody who understands the delicate balance of power, between the individual and the state. Right?

But the guy who said that, was the 28th president of the United States, Woodrow Wilson.

Now, does that sound like somebody that we know, maybe on the left, that is now saying things like, we've got to save democracy? We've got to save democracy?

He's killing democracy, by cutting the bureaucracy.

Wilson was exactly the same kind of politician. Except, he was the grandfather of all of this.

He was the architect of a vision, where government would no longer be confined by the rules, the outdated rules. And the chains of the Constitution.

He was the guy who said the Declaration of Independence needed to be cast aside, because it's an outdated relic. He was the guy that wanted you not to be governed by the laws of nature. And nature's God. But by an elite ruling class of scientists, experts, bureaucrats.

That's -- that's what he wanted.

Isn't that what we have right now? We're not -- we don't elect the president. You elect the president and nothing changes. Why?

Not just because both parties are alike. But because the bureaucracy is set in stone!

It's a ruling class, of scientists, experts, and bureaucrats. Wilson believed that the government was no longer the machine of our Founding Fathers, that needed to be shackled and restrained.

He thought government should be a living organism, an evolving entity, free from the so-called outdated principles of 1776. This is where we get the Constitution is a living, breathing thing.

No, it's not. No, that's Woodrow Wilson.

He looked at the Constitution. The greatest safeguard of liberty ever written. And didn't see it as a beacon of freedom. He saw it as an obstacle that needed to be overcome. He -- let me paint you this picture.

Imagine, you're sitting in a grand lecture hall. It's early 1900s. Gaslights are flickering. And a young professor steps up to the podium.

He stands at the podium, everybody starts to be quiet. It's all -- you're in the crowd, everybody there is the future rulers of America.

And he starts in to thunderous applause, with something that, I don't know.

Me. It would -- the back of my neck, the hair on the back of my neck would stand up.

He said, quote, the makers of the Constitution constructed the federal government upon a theory of checks and balances. Which was meant to limit the government's power.

And therefore, its ability to govern.

This was a great mistake. The Constitution was founded on the Newtonian theory of the universe.

But we now understand, that the government is not a machine. But a living thing.

It must evolve. It must adapt. And it must be freed from its chains!

End quote.

Freed from its chains. When I read that line, I -- I thought to myself. I thought of setting the monster free in Young Frankenstein.

You're free! You're free! It didn't work out well.

Okay? When you take something that is like fire. Hello, California. And just release it. It is a very bad thing.

Washington said, government is like fire!

It will be the master of you, if you're not the master of it. Are we the master of our government, or is it the master over us?

What do you think happens, when you -- when you have a government, I free it from its chains?

Does it become a benevolent force?

Does it look out for your best interest. Does it even know who you are, let alone answer to you?

Wilson wasn't just a professor. He was a man on a mission.

To change, and this is his words.

To change a man or a boy, to be the most unlike his father, as possible.

Isn't that what our education system is doing?

Wilson believed that we needed to move away from the messy system of self-government.

And have it all placed into the capable hands of an intellectual elite, that he called administrative experts.

So you can see this throughout our whole government. Anthony Fauci.

The law was, that we are not supposed to do gain-of-function research!

We now know, through all kinds of records, that have been released, that Anthony Fauci disagreed with that. And he made the decision, that we were going to do gain-of-function research!

Because it's not up to him, to answer to the people!

He answers -- he's the expert!

He's the administrator. He knows better than the average person. Even if other scientists disagree with him, he is science!

These experts, that are unelected, and unaccountable, Wilson saw this. This is -- these are the people that need to run the country.

Not as representatives of the people. But as scientists, technocrats, bureaucrats, who know better than you do, on how to live your life.

For Wilson, and now you're seeing his finished product, that Trump and Elon Musk are beginning to dismantle. You are now seeing, that his vision was that the American people were not individuals that were given God-give up rights.

They were just parts of a collective. A mass to be organized. To be managed.

To be directed.

He viewed the old principles of liberty and self-determination. Those are relics of an ignorant past.

Things that have to be replaced. By science. And numbers. Cold, efficiency of science and government regulation.

Now, our founders would say, that's all well and good.

We understand that, let's just take you, at face value and say you're honest in that. But what you're forgetting is that men go bad with power and money!

All men can be corrupted.

So it's not that we are putting chains on the government, because government is bad! No. Government is made up of the people that are in it.

And if you don't limit it, if you -- if you allow them to gain more and more power, and more and more money. It will go corrupt.

And it will begin to oppress you.

The government -- the founders weren't anti government. They were anti-out of control large government. Where the people were servants of that government, not the other way around.

Wilson wrote, the Declaration of Independence. That the -- the foundation of our freedoms.

He said, it was outdated.

He called the principles for all practices and purposes in the Declaration, meaningless.

Meaningless is his word.

The words that inspired the American Revolution, the ideas that all men are created equal, that our rights come from God. Not from government. Were to Wilson, irrelevant. And meaningless in the modern world.

Why? Because you're too stupid to understand what's really going on. You're too stupid to be able to manage the affairs, of not only the nation. But the world!

Every time we try to manage a nation, or the world, we go wrong!

Every single time!

He didn't believe you really have a right to property. To speech. To life itself, unless the government allowed it. If that doesn't terrify you, let me tell you something darker than that. Not morality.

Not faith, not the Constitution. But science should be the guiding force of government.

Well, we saw that with COVID. Didn't we?

Follow the science!

What kind of science?

The experiments that Fauci has been doing on animals and everything else. It's -- it's -- it's -- it's Mengele stuff.

It's really evil stuff! Because it has no medical purpose to it at all. The science that Wilson was talking about. Was eugenics.

And that's the same kind of stuff, that just named it something else. But it's the same kind of medicine that we're talking about now.

The kind that kills those who are unfit. Look at what's happening in Canada!

It's the kind of politics that led to policies of forced sterilization.

And racial segregation.

Which he put into practice. He was the guy who reseparated -- resegregated the military.

He segregated the government.

He praised the film, birth of a nation. Which we don't need to be the Klan. He believed in an America where government, led by an enlightened few, would decide who was fit to participate in society, and who wasn't.

Does that sound like America to you at all?

Or does that sound like the birth of something entirely different?

When he left office, it grew!

It took root in Washington, because they figured out, companies could go to Washington and lobby and get their way.

This was the beginning of all of the lobbyists in Washington.

And it -- it just grew. Ever expanding bureaucracy. A shadow government of unelected officials, who now control almost every aspect of your life! From what kind of car you drive. To what you eat.

To what stove you can have in your house. How you can build your house.

His dream was that a government would no longer be by the people. But by the experts.

The people would be managed. Guided. And nudged in the right direction.

So when they're saying that they're destroying democracy, no. They're destroying the bureaucracy, which is the antithesis to our founding documents.

TV

PBD Reacts to Glenn Beck's Prediction the Epstein Files WILL Be Exposed | Glenn TV | Ep 413

Radical transparency IS coming to America, Glenn says, but only if Kash Patel is confirmed to head the FBI. In fact, Glenn makes one of his boldest predictions yet: Kash will release the Epstein client list on his FIRST DAY leading the bureau. On tonight’s episode of "Glenn TV," Glenn is joined by ‪@PBDPodcast‬ host Patrick Bet-David and co-hosts Tom Ellsworth, Adam Sosnick, and Vincent Oshana. They discuss the damning ramifications releasing the Epstein list (or the Diddy list) may have for those who were associated with the island but were not guilty of partaking in criminal activity there — something President Trump expressed concern for before becoming elected. Plus, what will releasing the JFK files do to the CIA? We now know the CIA was in Miami following Lee Harvey Oswald, so why then didn’t the CIA stop him? Public trust in our federal government dropped substantially after the JFK assassination, and it continued to plummet over the next several decades until it hit a new low (14%) under Biden. Can Trump — with the radical transparency Glenn predicts is coming — turn that all around? PBD predicts Trump could increase that number to 50% or even 60%. Democrats see it coming, too. Their meltdowns over the DOGE and Elon Musk ending wasteful spending now are on fully display: “Accountability is here, and they’re panicking.” Lastly, Glenn and the "PBD Podcast" guys discuss how the first assassination attempt against Trump changed him as a person, providing him with both laser focus and an understanding that his job in the White House is much bigger than himself.

RADIO

Trump’s Treasury Secretary SHUTS DOWN Reporter Trying to Attack DOGE

The Biden government hired 80,000 new IRS agents to make sure YOU followed every one of their complicated tax laws. But when President Trump ordered DOGE to audit the government, politicians and the media squealed! That should speak volumes about what their true priorities are, Glenn says. Glenn and Pat review some of the latest pushback from the establishment, including how Democrats are whining about Elon Musk and how a judge tried to block even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent from accessing Treasury data.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: You know, it's astonishing how many people have found a very clear common sense voice and a lack of fear.

They seem to be all over this administration.

Stephen Miller is one of them, don't you think, Pat?

PAT: Definitely.

And he was talking about the angry Dems. And had some things to say about them. Deputy chief, Stephen Miller, cut 14.

VOICE: The Democrat use of the term unelected is really quite remarkable here. Donald Trump was elected in an overwhelming landslide.

These are Donald Trump staffers. It's like saying that Mike Walls, National Security adviser is unelected. Or Susan Wiles, the chief of staff is unelected. Or Donald Trump's communication team is unelected.

This is presidential staff that serves at the pleasure and for the president, just as I do. I am a staffer, for the president of the United States. He is elected. He is the one that the American people have chosen to implement his agenda. This is the agenda the American people voted for.

That he is asking his staff. His subordinates. His employees. To implement.

The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy.

USAID is unelected. The FBI, that persecuted President Trump for eight years, is unelected.

The CIA and those who have laundered intelligence to try to change the foreign policy of the United States are unelected.

President Trump is restoring democracy, by controlling the federal bureaucracy.

There is one man in the country, who is elected bit whole American people, to implement an agenda they support. That is the president.

Every other officer in this country, members of Congress and Senate are elected at the state and local level. The Constitution puts one man in charge of the federal executive branch. And that's the president.

GLENN: Understood. Understood.

PAT: Let him finish.

GLENN: He's absolutely awesome.

And absolutely right.

I mean, that's the thing -- I just don't understand. When they were -- when the federal judge tried to block and did for this weekend.

But it's not going to last long.

Tried to block the secretary of the Treasury

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: From even looking at the data, that is produced by the Treasury?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Who is running things? My gosh.

PAT: Well, Treasury secretary Scott Bessent was interviewed over the weekend, and he had some things to say about -- just about that!

VOICE: Mr. Secretary, we are inside the cash room in the Treasury department. It's almost impossible to overstate how important the work that's done in the US building. Is the US financial system.

Yet right now, there is widespread concern about the DOGE teams access to sensitive payment systems.

Are you worried at all, that that access and that tinkering of the payment systems, could affect the Treasury's market or cause any disruption.

VOICE: Well, good. Thank you for asking me about that.

Because there's a lot of misinformation out there.

First of all, when you say the DOGE team, these are Treasury employees. Two Treasury employees, one of whom I personally interviewed in his final round. There is no tinkering with the system. They are on read only. They are looking. They can make no changes. It is an operational program to suggest improvements. So we make 1.3 billion payments a year. And this is two employees who are working with a group of long-standing employees.

VOICE: The letter that the treasury department sent earlier this week, talked about how the team currently does not have access to change the system.

Have they, at any point this year, had the ability to make changes?

VOICE: Absolutely not. This is no different than you would have at a private company.
By the way, the ability to change the system, sits at the Federal Reserve.

So it does not even lie in this building. So they can make suggestions on how to change the system, but we don't even run the system.

VOICE: And if they ask her, they request the ability to change the system. Would you grant that?

VOICE: No. Again, they have no ability to change the system.

I have no ability to grant that change. That they can make suggestions. Then it would go to the Federal Reserve. And just like any large system. There would be tests.

There would be this. There would be that.

And then the fed will determine whether these changes are robust or not.

VOICE: As the Secretary of Treasury, you also oversee the IRS.

Do you know what kind of access the team has to IRS data or individual taxpayer data?

VOICE: Well, I'm glad you asked that too.

Because, look, the IRS, the privacy issue is one of the biggest issues. And over the past four years, we've seen a lot of leaks out of there. The IRS systems are quite poor.

When I started in college in 1980, I learned the program. I think, there are 12 different systems at the IRS that still run on COBOL. But as of now, there is no engagement at the IRS.

VOICE: Elon Musk just a few -- half an hour ago, tweeted out that Treasury needs to stop approving certain payments. Has your staff tried to block any payments at the Treasury?

VOICE: We have not.

And I'm glad you asked that too. And just to put it in perspective, Elon and I are completely aligned in terms of cutting waste and increasing accountability and transparency for the American people.

I believe that this DOGE program in my adult life is one of the most important audits of government. Or changes to government structure, we have seen.

That when I was in my 20s, we had the grace report. And there's some great suggestions that came out of that.

Never implemented under Clinton and Gore.

I think it was to government efficiency. Or to reduce government. Nothing happened.

So, you know, President Trump came in. There's a big agenda.

And I think there are gigantic cost savings for the American people here.

And I think it's unfortunate the way the media wants to lampoon what is going on.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: Thank you.

VOICE: These are highly trained professionals. And this is not some broken band going around doing things. This is methodical, and it is going to yield big savings.

PAT: Jeez. And what's wrong with that? Is there anything wrong with that? I don't think so.

GLENN: Right. Did you hear a nonhostile question coming from the Bloomberg reporter?

PAT: No. A nonhostile? No. But he handled it in a nonhostile way.

He was great, wasn't he?

GLENN: Yeah, very well.

I mean, yeah. And it's a little scary, that the Treasury Secretary can't make any of these decisions, they're all made by the Federal Reserve.

That's a problem, which is why DOGE wants to bring Ron Paul in for an audit of the Fed, which would be fantastic.

PAT: It would be great.

GLENN: Can you imagine what we would find at the Fed now?

PAT: Oh, my gosh. I can't imagine it. And it's the fed with the power to make these changes.

That's amazing too.

That they can't even do it from the Treasury. That's kind of eye-opening.

But I think they need to use that term audit of government more. Because what's wrong with that.

GLENN: Yes. That's why they're going into the Pentagon. The seventh audit failed.

Let me ask you something: You know, she brings up the IRS.

The government hired 80,000 new IRS agents, to go over your records. To make sure nothing -- no funny business is going on with you.

That you're paying every dime that you're supposed to pay. Because there's a shortfall.

No! There's not a shortfall.

They're spending too much. When we go in, and try to send accountants in, to say, how did you spend this money?

The same thing the IRS does to you, every year, they squeal like little pigs.

I don't know.

If -- you know, you went in to the IRS every year with the attitude that the Democrats have.

You would be audited every year. Because somebody, probably rightfully so would go, wait a minute.

Why are you panicking so much. Why are you saying we can't have access to your records?

This is a legal operation. What's happening here?

And it -- it kills me that the media is sticking up for corruption.

Whose side are they on?

PAT: Well, they're on the side of corruption. Because they're benefiting from it.

And that's been the problem for how many decades now?

How many centuries now?

GLENN: I know. I know.

PAT: Have we run the nation in a way that the Founding Fathers intended, since, I don't know. 1830. Probably not.

GLENN: No. So, you know what, I have a copy of the first budget. It was on the front page of a Columbia newspaper from South Carolina.

And it -- it lays out George Washington's budget.

And it actually asks Congress to increase the budget for firewood, because the Capitol was cold.

And they needed extra firewood to keep things warm.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: And I don't even know if that got passed. I have no idea if that got passed.

PAT: Jeez.

GLENN: But that's the way we should be. Oh, you know what, put a sweater on, Congress. Oh, you're a little cold in there. Put a sweater on.

PAT: Exactly.

GLENN: They're the ones that should be putting the sweater on. Not us. Not us.

PAT: Look how Thomas Jefferson struggled with the Louisiana Purchase.

I mean, we almost didn't do it. Because he thought, it wasn't proper. He thought it was unconstitutional.

But it turned out to be too good a deal, and we did it anyway.

But they had a completely different mindset. You know, the funds that the federal government had, that they got from American taxpayers, whether they pay in excise taxes, or wherever their taxes came from. Those were sacred funds.

And they didn't just throw them out to anybody for any reason.

GLENN: Yes. And look at --

PAT: We've got to get back to that.

GLENN: We can spend a trillion dollars and have it all just vanish on us.

But if Donald Trump says, let's take $2 trillion and buy Greenland.

Everybody would freak out. Which one should you freak out about?

The investment, or the loss?

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: It's -- it's -- it's an unspeakable horror, what is going on. And how the people are reacting to it.

You know, everybody in America should be happy about this.

One other truth speaker. Somebody else who is just very good at saying exactly what he means. And getting right to the truth. Is Hegseth.

Here he is, talking about our strength. Cut 22.

VOICE: I think the single dumbest phrase in military history, is our diversity is our strength.

I think our strength is our unity. Our strength is our shared purpose. Regardless of our background. Regardless of how we grew up. Regardless of our gender. Regardless of our race. In this department, we will treat everyone equally.

We will treat everyone with fairness. We will treat everyone with respect, and we will judge you as an individual by your merit. And by your commitment to the team and the mission.

That's how it has been. That's how it will be.

Any inference otherwise, is meant to divide or create complications, that otherwise should not and do not exist.

GLENN: I've got to tell you. How is that controversial at all?

We're -- you know why they keep teams together.

You go through buds and you keep that team together, because their strength is their unity. You don't send them into war with a bunch of people that are all different with each other. You send them into war that all have different skills, yes.

But are acting as one, with one purpose.