How nearly 5 years of unbelievable pain changed everything you knew about Glenn Beck

November 10, 2014

Writer

Watch the full special for free on TheBlaze TV

Every person who has truly turned their life around can point to a moment when everything changed. It's a pivot point, a change in perspective. We all have many, but Glenn has been keeping one hidden for the past four and a half years - until tonight. What changed Glenn from a guy talking about politics and news to love and culture? Where did the "new Glenn Beck" come from?

For over four years, Glenn struggled with serious health issues. Stabbing pain in his hands and feet. Seizures. Ongoing issues with his vocal chords and eyesight. For years, the doctors couldn't explain exactly what was wrong or how to fix it. He had to make drastic changes to his life and his work. After a miraculous treatment he now has a clear bill of health, and with it a new perspective on his purpose in life. It's a long story, one he had kept hidden from all but a few of his closest confidants. But tonight, he told the full story to the audience and what has planned for the future.

Around the time of Restoring Honor, Glenn began to experience extreme pain in his extremities, as well as slight paralysis in his vocal chords and issues with his eyes. The doctors thought it was a painful form of neuropathy, but couldn't figure out how to solve the problem.

"My hands, feet, arms and legs feel like someone had just crushed them, or pushed broken glass into my feet," Glenn explained. "While I was at Fox the pain would get so bad that the crew worked out hand signals so they would know when to take the camera off of me."

"I went to doctor after doctor, each with a new finding and leaving me with more questions. I tried different diets, medications, and even moved to a warmer climate," he said. During a TBI test a year and a half ago, the results showed him functioning at a level that was below 10%. Doctors said if nothing changed, he would likely end up in a physical state comparable to Muhammed Ali.

The physical deterioration impacted all areas of his life. At work, Pat and Stu would have to carry on the radio show with no notice if he experienced an attack. In his personal life, Tania would have to help tie his shoes and button his shirt. Flying exacerbated the pain, and after one particularly bad episode Tania and Glenn's friends had to carry him into the hotel

"Out of it all, the worst part is what my wife went through," Glenn said. "It has taught me a ton and made our marriage amazing."

"My pivot point came one night shortly after returning home. We were all in the kitchen as a family and I had an attack. it put me on the ground with my family all around me. I saw their faces and the idea that I would someday not remember them nor would I remember my soon to be born grandchild hit me like I bag of bricks," Glenn said.

He found himself torn between a desire to dedicate what could be his final years of clarity to his family and the fact that the Lord hadn't told him to give up and stop. He always heard a quiet voice saying there was hope, that there could be a cure out there.

That hope became a reality at the Carrick Brain Center in Dallas, TX. After a few visits, the doctors found that Glenn was suffering from an auto immune disorder and adrenal fatigue. But they did more than diagnose the problem, they believed they could fix it. Glenn underwent a series of unconventional and experimental treatments. The tests were brutal and exhausting, but in the end Glenn took another TBI test and tested in 90% percentile.

"I have received a clean bill of health," Glenn said. For the past several years Glenn has been operating with essentially half a brain, but now "it is all back online."

Why does this matter? Why would Glenn reveal this intensely personal experience that his put his family, his friends, and his coworkers through incredible stress?

Many longterm viewers have noticed changes to the production of the show, but even more have noticed changes to the content of the show and to Glenn himself. Reaching out to those with different political viewpoints, bringing soccer balls and food to illegal immigrant children on the border, talking on and on about "culture" and "love" - several people in the audience have objected to some or all of these things over the past year. But these changes are a direct result of Glenn's health scare and his pivot point.

"When people were mad at me for thinking I didn't care anymore, I can't blame them. They expected me to be honest with them. For those who question why I have been saying we need to love one another, they didn't know that when you are faced with a real timeline of life, you begin to measure everything and its worth," Glenn said.

Glenn has come out the other end of this experience with a new perspective, a new message, and a new mission.

In the worst days of his health scare, Glenn looked for people who could replace him if the worst were to happen. Pat and Stu on radio, Dana and Buck Sexton on TV. But the hardest "role" to fill was that of the creative storyteller. Glenn has always been a creative force and a fountain of ideas and stories, and he needed to download those stories to someone who could take them and tell them in new and exciting ways if he couldn't do it.

During Restoring Love, he came across Ben McPherson, an artist and filmmaker who was managing one of the singers at the event. The two hit it off, and Glenn recruited him to come work at Mercury and head up the American Dream Labs. Ben agreed, and behind-the-scenes the two of them have been developing several film and television projects that embody the eternal theme of "love each other", but will be told in new and exciting ways.

"Maybe you didn't even notice, but I have been gone. And I am happy to say, I am back. But with all of this time - what do I spend it on? I have pivoted. I know what my life is about now and it isn't about money, fame, or division. It isn't about politics or a 5pm TV show that continues to highlight problems," Glenn said.

"I want to tell you what it is I need to accomplish in my lifetime," Glenn said. "We need to tell the stories of love and courage where the good guys win."

Over the three nights, Glenn will reveal more about the projects the American Dream Labs have been developing. They range from true history like the battle between Tesla and Edison, to new stories of Santa and "the greatest story ever told."

"What would you do tonight if you knew you wouldn't wake up in the morning?" Glenn asked. He charged the audience to unite on hope and courage, and he promised not to waste a moment of his second chance on life.

Shocking Christian massacres unveiled

Aldara Zarraoa / Contributor | Getty Images

Is a Christian Genocide unfolding overseas?

Recent reports suggest an alarming escalation in violence against Christians, raising questions about whether these acts constitute genocide under international law. Recently, Glenn hosted former U.S. Army Special Forces Sniper Tim Kennedy, who discussed a predictive model that forecasts a surge in global Christian persecution for the summer of 2025.

From Africa to Asia and the Middle East, extreme actions—some described as genocidal—have intensified over the past year. Over 380 million Christians worldwide face high levels of persecution, a number that continues to climb. With rising international concern, the United Nations and human rights groups are urging protective measures by the global community. Is a Christian genocide being waged in the far corners of the globe? Where are they taking place, and what is being done?

India: Hindu Extremist Violence Escalates

Yawar Nazir / Contributor | Getty Images

In India, attacks on Christians have surged as Hindu extremist groups gain influence within the country. In February 2025, Hindu nationalist leader Aadesh Soni organized a 50,000-person rally in Chhattisgarh, where he called for the rape and murder of all Christians in nearby villages and demanded the execution of Christian leaders to erase Christianity. Other incidents include forced conversions, such as a June 2024 attack in Chhattisgarh, where a Hindu mob gave Christian families a 10-day ultimatum to convert to Hinduism. In December 2024, a Christian man in Uttar Pradesh was attacked, forcibly converted, and paraded while the mob chanted "Death to Jesus."

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommends designating India a "Country of Particular Concern" and imposing targeted sanctions on those perpetrating these attacks. The international community is increasingly alarmed by the rising tide of religious violence in India.

Syria: Sectarian Violence Post-Regime Change

LOUAI BESHARA / Contributor | Getty Images

Following the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024, Syria has seen a wave of sectarian violence targeting religious minorities, including Christians, with over 1,000 killed in early 2025. It remains unclear whether Christians are deliberately targeted or caught in broader conflicts, but many fear persecution by the new regime or extremist groups. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a dominant rebel group and known al-Qaeda splinter group now in power, is known for anti-Christian sentiments, heightening fears of increased persecution.

Christians, especially converts from Islam, face severe risks in the unstable post-regime environment. The international community is calling for humanitarian aid and protection for Syria’s vulnerable minority communities.

Democratic Republic of Congo: A "Silent Genocide"

Hugh Kinsella Cunningham / Stringer | Getty Images

In February 2025, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an ISIS-affiliated group, beheaded 70 Christians—men, women, and children—in a Protestant church in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, after tying their hands. This horrific massacre, described as a "silent genocide" reminiscent of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, has shocked the global community.

Since 1996, the ADF and other militias have killed over six million people, with Christians frequently targeted. A Christmas 2024 attack killed 46, further decimating churches in the region. With violence escalating, humanitarian organizations are urging immediate international intervention to address the crisis.

POLL: Starbase exposed: Musk’s vision or corporate takeover?

MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO / Contributor | Getty Images

Is Starbase the future of innovation or a step too far?

Elon Musk’s ambitious Starbase project in South Texas is reshaping Boca Chica into a cutting-edge hub for SpaceX’s Starship program, promising thousands of jobs and a leap toward Mars colonization. Supporters see Musk as a visionary, driving economic growth and innovation in a historically underserved region. However, local critics, including Brownsville residents and activists, argue that SpaceX’s presence raises rents, restricts beach access, and threatens environmental harm, with Starbase’s potential incorporation as a city sparking fears of unchecked corporate control. As pro-Musk advocates clash with anti-Musk skeptics, will Starbase unite the community or deepen the divide?

Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Is Starbase’s development a big win for South Texas?

Should Starbase become its own city?

Is Elon Musk’s vision more of a benefit than a burden for the region?

Shocking truth behind Trump-Zelenskyy mineral deal unveiled

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have finalized a landmark agreement that will shape the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations. The agreement focuses on mineral access and war recovery.

After a tense March meeting, Trump and Zelenskyy signed a deal on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, granting the U.S. preferential mineral rights in Ukraine in exchange for continued military support. Glenn analyzed an earlier version of the agreement in March, when Zelenskyy rejected it, highlighting its potential benefits for America, Ukraine, and Europe. Glenn praised the deal’s strategic alignment with U.S. interests, including reducing reliance on China for critical minerals and fostering regional peace.

However, the agreement signed this week differs from the March proposal Glenn praised. Negotiations led to significant revisions, reflecting compromises on both sides. What changes were made? What did each leader seek, and what did they achieve? How will this deal impact the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations and global geopolitics? Below, we break down the key aspects of the agreement.

What did Trump want?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump aimed to curb what many perceive as Ukraine’s overreliance on U.S. aid while securing strategic advantages for America. His primary goals included obtaining reimbursement for the billions in military aid provided to Ukraine, gaining exclusive access to Ukraine’s valuable minerals (such as titanium, uranium, and lithium), and reducing Western dependence on China for critical resources. These minerals are essential for aerospace, energy, and technology sectors, and Trump saw their acquisition as a way to bolster U.S. national security and economic competitiveness. Additionally, he sought to advance peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war, positioning the U.S. as a key mediator.

Ultimately, Trump secured preferential—but not exclusive—rights to extract Ukraine’s minerals through the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, as outlined in the agreement. The U.S. will not receive reimbursement for past aid, but future military contributions will count toward the joint fund, designed to support Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Zelenskyy’s commitment to peace negotiations under U.S. leadership aligns with Trump’s goal of resolving the conflict, giving him leverage in discussions with Russia.

These outcomes partially meet Trump’s objectives. The preferential mineral rights strengthen U.S. access to critical resources, but the lack of exclusivity and reimbursement limits the deal’s financial benefits. The peace commitment, however, positions Trump as a central figure in shaping the war’s resolution, potentially enhancing his diplomatic influence.

What did Zelenskyy want?

Global Images Ukraine / Contributor | Getty Images

Zelenskyy sought to sustain U.S. military and economic support without the burden of repaying past aid, which has been critical for Ukraine’s defense against Russia. He also prioritized reconstruction funds to rebuild Ukraine’s war-torn economy and infrastructure. Security guarantees from the U.S. to deter future Russian aggression were a key demand, though controversial, as they risked entangling America in long-term commitments. Additionally, Zelenskyy aimed to retain control over Ukraine’s mineral wealth to safeguard national sovereignty and align with the country’s European Union membership aspirations.

The final deal delivered several of Zelenskyy’s priorities. The reconstruction fund, supported by future U.S. aid, provides a financial lifeline for Ukraine’s recovery without requiring repayment of past assistance. Ukraine retained ownership of its subsoil and decision-making authority over mineral extraction, granting only preferential access to the U.S. However, Zelenskyy conceded on security guarantees, a significant compromise, and agreed to pursue peace talks under Trump’s leadership, which may involve territorial or political concessions to Russia.

Zelenskyy’s outcomes reflect a delicate balance. The reconstruction fund and retained mineral control bolster Ukraine’s economic and sovereign interests, but the absence of security guarantees and pressure to negotiate peace could strain domestic support and challenge Ukraine’s long-term stability.

What does this mean for the future?

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

While Trump didn’t secure all his demands, the deal advances several of his broader strategic goals. By gaining access to Ukraine’s mineral riches, the U.S. undermines China’s dominance over critical elements like lithium and graphite, essential for technology and energy industries. This shift reduces American and European dependence on Chinese supply chains, strengthening Western industrial and tech sectors. Most significantly, the agreement marks a pivotal step toward peace in Europe. Ending the Russia-Ukraine war, which has claimed thousands of lives, is a top priority for Trump, and Zelenskyy’s commitment to U.S.-led peace talks enhances Trump’s leverage in negotiations with Russia. Notably, the deal avoids binding U.S. commitments to Ukraine’s long-term defense, preserving flexibility for future administrations.

The deal’s broader implications align with the vision Glenn outlined in March, when he praised its potential to benefit America, Ukraine, and Europe by securing resources and creating peace. While the final agreement differs from Glenn's hopes, it still achieves key goals he outlined.

Did Trump's '51st state' jab just cost Canada its independence?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Did Canadians just vote in their doom?

On April 28, 2025, Canada held its federal election, and what began as a promising conservative revival ended in a Liberal Party regroup, fueled by an anti-Trump narrative. This outcome is troubling for Canada, as Glenn revealed when he exposed the globalist tendencies of the new Prime Minister, Mark Carney. On a recent episode of his podcast, Glenn hosted former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, who provided insight into Carney’s history. She revealed that, as governor of the Bank of England, Carney contributed to the 2022 pension crisis through policies that triggered excessive money printing, leading to rampant inflation.

Carney’s election and the Liberal Party’s fourth consecutive victory spell trouble for a Canada already straining under globalist policies. Many believed Canadians were fed up with the progressive agenda when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned amid plummeting public approval. Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, started 2025 with a 25-point lead over his Liberal rivals, fueling optimism about his inevitable victory.

So, what went wrong? How did Poilievre go from predicted Prime Minister to losing his own parliamentary seat? And what details of this election could cost Canada dearly?

A Costly Election

Mark Carney (left) and Pierre Poilievre (right)

GEOFF ROBINSPETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

The election defied the expectations of many analysts who anticipated a Conservative win earlier this year.

For Americans unfamiliar with parliamentary systems, here’s a brief overview of Canada’s federal election process. Unlike U.S. presidential elections, Canadians do not directly vote for their Prime Minister. Instead, they vote for a political party. Each Canadian resides in a "riding," similar to a U.S. congressional district, and during the election, each riding elects a Member of Parliament (MP). The party that secures the majority of MPs forms the government and appoints its leader as Prime Minister.

At the time of writing, the Liberal Party has secured 169 of the 172 seats needed for a majority, all but ensuring their victory. In contrast, the Conservative Party holds 144 seats, indicating that the Liberal Party will win by a solid margin, which will make passing legislation easier. This outcome is a far cry from the landslide Conservative victory many had anticipated.

Poilievre's Downfall

PETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

What caused Poilievre’s dramatic fall from front-runner to losing his parliamentary seat?

Despite his surge in popularity earlier this year, which coincided with enthusiasm surrounding Trump’s inauguration, many attribute the Conservative loss to Trump’s influence. Commentators argue that Trump’s repeated references to Canada as the "51st state" gave Liberals a rallying cry: Canadian sovereignty. The Liberal Party framed a vote for Poilievre as a vote to surrender Canada to U.S. influence, positioning Carney as the defender of national independence.

Others argue that Poilievre’s lackluster campaign was to blame. Critics suggest he should have embraced a Trump-style, Canada-first message, emphasizing a balanced relationship with the U.S. rather than distancing himself from Trump’s annexation remarks. By failing to counter the Liberal narrative effectively, Poilievre lost momentum and voter confidence.

This election marks a pivotal moment for Canada, with far-reaching implications for its sovereignty and economic stability. As Glenn has warned, Carney’s globalist leanings could align Canada more closely with international agendas, potentially at the expense of its national interests. Canadians now face the challenge of navigating this new political landscape under a leader with a controversial track record.

Glenn's Show Prep