Blog
LatestArticlesVideos
Radio
LivePodcastSerialsStations
TV
Podcasts
The Glenn Beck ProgramThe Glenn Beck PodcastThe Beck Story
Fine Art
Real Estate
More
AboutCharityBooksSponsorsShopContact
SEARCH
Live Radio

©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY

Live

Glenn's Show Prep

Hell Hath Frozen Over: Liberals Taking a Stand Against Hillary Clinton

October 31, 2016
Lori Hanes

Writer

The world is upside down. Key liberal voices are speaking out objectively against Hillary Clinton in the wake of the FBI's move to reopen the investigation of her email server. The Chicago Tribune recently published an op-ed recommending Democrats ask Hillary to step down. Doug Schoen, a liberal strategist who worked for Bill Clinton, spoke with Fox News and declared he could no longer support Hillary Clinton. And now, Mika Brzezinski with MSNBC has taken an introspective look at the Democrats' presidential nominee:

RELATED: Hillary Hands Trump the Greatest Gift Ever Given a Candidate in the History of America

Watching this whole weekend, I will say, first of all, everyone talks about what Comey did as being outrageous. This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago. So I don't really get that. The bottom line is, this all goes back to the server, something that she shouldn't have done, something that was way more than a mistake. Way more. And this is a self-inflicted, massive wound. And I . . . I just kept thinking how I've been on my horse, going after Republicans and the Republican Party. You nominated this guy. You nominated Donald Trump. How could you do that? When I'm thinking, Democrats nominated someone who is under an FBI investigation for having a private server, among other things.

By any measure, it's an incredible turn of events.

"I mean, that's incredible. There's your pathway to reconciliation. You recognize your wrongs. I'll recognize my wrongs. Now, let's move forward," Glenn said Monday on his radio program.

Read below or listen to the full segment for answers to these shocking questions:

• What is Doug Schoen's objection to a Hillary Clinton presidency?

• How stunned was Fox News anchor Harris Faulkner at Schoen's turnaround?

• Which former presidents look like a dream come true right now?

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors:

GLENN: Democrat campaign consultant, worked for the Clintons -- Bill Clinton's reelection bid in '96, Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency in '08, Democratic consultant.

He is a friend of the Clintons. New audio on what he's going to do now.

He has already endorsed Hillary Clinton. Listen now.

VOICE: Given that this investigation is going to go on for many months after the election --

VOICE: No matter who wins.

VOICE: -- no matter who wins, but if the Secretary of State wins, we will have a president under criminal investigation with Huma Abedin under investigation, the Secretary of State, the president-elect, should she win, under investigation. Harris, under these circumstances, I am actively reassessing my support. I'm not a Trump --

VOICE: Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait a minute.

VOICE: Right.

VOICE: You're not going to vote for Hillary Clinton?

VOICE: Harris, I'm deeply concerned that we will have a constitutional crisis if she's elected.

VOICE: Wow.

PAT: Wow.

VOICE: I want to learn more this week. See what we see. But as of today, I am not a supporter of the Secretary of State for the --

VOICE: How long have you known the Clintons, Doug?

VOICE: I've known the Clintons since '94.

PAT: Wow. Wow.

GLENN: I mean, Stu is -- Stu said an hour ago -- I mean, I all right. I mean, I still think that the lines of the supporters and those who are against Donald Trump, just like those -- if this would have happened to Donald Trump, I think the same could be said that what Donald Trump said about going out on Fifth Avenue and shooting people applies to Hillary Clinton too, that she could go out and shoot people. And nobody would say anything. And, in fact, some people do think she shot people.

JEFFY: Yeah.

GLENN: But this is an example of her being absolutely totally corrupt. And is anybody going to change their mind?

Stu, you may be right. This is a pretty big one. And another big one was Mika on MSNBC.

Now, is there any time that you have heard Mika do anything but fawn over the Clintons? Listen to this.

MIKA: Watching this whole weekend, I will say first of all, everyone talks about what Comey did as being outrageous. This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago. So I don't really get that.

The bottom line is, this all goes back to the server, something that she shouldn't have done, something that was way more than a mistake. Way more. And this is a self-inflicted, massive wound.

And I -- I just kept thinking how I've been on my horse, going after Republicans and the Republican Party. You nominated this guy. You nominated Donald Trump. How could you do that?

When I'm thinking, Democrats nominated someone who is under an FBI investigation for having a private server among other things.

PAT: It's incredible.

JEFFY: Wow.

PAT: You just -- you don't expect an honest assessment.

GLENN: No, listen to what's happening.

PAT: From Mika Brzezinski, you don't expect that.

GLENN: Listen what is happening. What did she just do?

She did what I did. She's done what I've done: Look, I could talk about the other side all day long. I can't affect the other side. I can only affect me.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: I can't even affect our side, but I can affect me.

PAT: Otherwise, who would be the nominee right now? It wouldn't be Donald Trump. If we could affect our side, it wouldn't be Donald Trump.

GLENN: Yeah. If we could affect our side, it wouldn't be Donald Trump. It would be Ted Cruz. If Mika could affect her side, now maybe she knows, "Wow, it shouldn't have been Hillary Clinton." That's remarkable. People are starting to wake up because we all know, both sides know, this is a Dumpster fire. These two candidates are the worst two candidates in American history, bar none. Bar none.

If you think that George Bush, lefties -- if you think George Bush embarrassed us on the global scale -- because that's all we heard was George Bush was an embarrassment. We have no credibility around the globe because of how bad George Bush is. You wanted to restore credibility. Then we spent eight years with Barack Obama, who we feel destroyed our credibility.

JEFFY: Because you did.

GLENN: Can I tell you something? Both of those people look like dreams come true at this point.

We are the laughingstock of the world. In fact, I believe the world is starting to be afraid of America because this time it's not the candidates.

Oh, we didn't know. I mean, I know, only some of us knew.

No, everybody knows. You know who you're voting for when you're voting for Donald Trump. Just the same as the Democrats know exactly who they're voting for when they're voting for Hillary Clinton. We're just dismissing them because they're playing for the red and the blue team. That's the only difference. We just dismiss it.

And you just heard Mika -- play that again. And play it all the way to the end, please.

MIKA: Watching this whole weekend, I will say first of all, everyone talks about what Comey did as big outrageous. This was a great, credible man with great integrity a week ago. So I don't really get that. The bottom line is, this all goes back to the server, something she shouldn't have done, something that was way more than a mistake -- way more. And this is a self-inflicted, massive wound. And I -- I just kept thinking how I've been on my horse going after Republicans and the Republican Party.

You nominated this guy. You nominated Donald Trump. How could you do that? But I'm thinking Democrats nominated someone who is under an FBI investigation for having a private server, among other things.

So here we are.

GLENN: I mean, that's incredible.

JEFFY: Wow.

GLENN: There's your pathway to reconciliation.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: There's your pathway to reconciliation. You recognize your wrongs. I'll recognize my wrongs. Now, let's move forward.

Featured Image: Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign rally at Dickerson Community Center on October 29, 2016 in Daytona Beach, Florida. With less than two weeks to go until Election Day, Hillary Clinton is campaigning in Florida. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Did Trump's '51st state' jab just cost Canada its independence?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Did Canadians just vote in their doom?

On April 28, 2025, Canada held its federal election, and what began as a promising conservative revival ended in a Liberal Party regroup, fueled by an anti-Trump narrative. This outcome is troubling for Canada, as Glenn revealed when he exposed the globalist tendencies of the new Prime Minister, Mark Carney. On a recent episode of his podcast, Glenn hosted former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, who provided insight into Carney’s history. She revealed that, as governor of the Bank of England, Carney contributed to the 2022 pension crisis through policies that triggered excessive money printing, leading to rampant inflation.

Carney’s election and the Liberal Party’s fourth consecutive victory spell trouble for a Canada already straining under globalist policies. Many believed Canadians were fed up with the progressive agenda when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned amid plummeting public approval. Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, started 2025 with a 25-point lead over his Liberal rivals, fueling optimism about his inevitable victory.

So, what went wrong? How did Poilievre go from predicted Prime Minister to losing his own parliamentary seat? And what details of this election could cost Canada dearly?

A Costly Election

Mark Carney (left) and Pierre Poilievre (right)

GEOFF ROBINSPETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

The election defied the expectations of many analysts who anticipated a Conservative win earlier this year.

For Americans unfamiliar with parliamentary systems, here’s a brief overview of Canada’s federal election process. Unlike U.S. presidential elections, Canadians do not directly vote for their Prime Minister. Instead, they vote for a political party. Each Canadian resides in a "riding," similar to a U.S. congressional district, and during the election, each riding elects a Member of Parliament (MP). The party that secures the majority of MPs forms the government and appoints its leader as Prime Minister.

At the time of writing, the Liberal Party has secured 169 of the 172 seats needed for a majority, all but ensuring their victory. In contrast, the Conservative Party holds 144 seats, indicating that the Liberal Party will win by a solid margin, which will make passing legislation easier. This outcome is a far cry from the landslide Conservative victory many had anticipated.

Poilievre's Downfall

PETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

What caused Poilievre’s dramatic fall from front-runner to losing his parliamentary seat?

Despite his surge in popularity earlier this year, which coincided with enthusiasm surrounding Trump’s inauguration, many attribute the Conservative loss to Trump’s influence. Commentators argue that Trump’s repeated references to Canada as the "51st state" gave Liberals a rallying cry: Canadian sovereignty. The Liberal Party framed a vote for Poilievre as a vote to surrender Canada to U.S. influence, positioning Carney as the defender of national independence.

Others argue that Poilievre’s lackluster campaign was to blame. Critics suggest he should have embraced a Trump-style, Canada-first message, emphasizing a balanced relationship with the U.S. rather than distancing himself from Trump’s annexation remarks. By failing to counter the Liberal narrative effectively, Poilievre lost momentum and voter confidence.

This election marks a pivotal moment for Canada, with far-reaching implications for its sovereignty and economic stability. As Glenn has warned, Carney’s globalist leanings could align Canada more closely with international agendas, potentially at the expense of its national interests. Canadians now face the challenge of navigating this new political landscape under a leader with a controversial track record.

Top FIVE takeaways from Glenn's EXCLUSIVE interview with Trump

Image courtesy of the White House

As President Trump approaches his 100th day in office, Glenn Beck joined him to evaluate his administration’s progress with a gripping new interview. April 30th is President Trump's 100th day in office, and what an eventful few months it has been. To commemorate this milestone, Glenn Beck was invited to the White House for an exclusive interview with the President.

Their conversation covered critical topics, including the border crisis, DOGE updates, the revival of the U.S. energy sector, AI advancements, and more. Trump remains energized, acutely aware of the nation’s challenges, and determined to address them.

Here are the top five takeaways from Glenn Beck’s one-on-one with President Trump:

Border Security and Cartels

DAVID SWANSON / Contributor | Getty Images

Early in the interview, Glenn asked if Trump views Mexico as a failed narco-state. While Trump avoided the term, he acknowledged that cartels effectively control Mexico. He noted that while not all Mexican officials are corrupt, those who are honest fear severe repercussions for opposing the cartels.

Trump was unsurprised when Glenn cited evidence that cartels are using Pentagon-supplied weapons intended for the Mexican military. He is also aware of the fentanyl influx from China through Mexico and is committed to stopping the torrent of the dangerous narcotic. Trump revealed that he has offered military aid to Mexico to combat the cartels, but these offers have been repeatedly declined. While significant progress has been made in securing the border, Trump emphasized that more must be done.

American Energy Revival

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump’s tariffs are driving jobs back to America, with the AI sector showing immense growth potential. He explained that future AI systems require massive, costly complexes with significant electricity demands. China is outpacing the U.S. in building power plants to support AI development, threatening America’s technological leadership.

To counter this, Trump is cutting bureaucratic red tape, allowing AI companies to construct their own power plants, potentially including nuclear facilities, to meet the energy needs of AI server farms. Glenn was thrilled to learn these plants could also serve as utilities, supplying excess power to homes and businesses. Trump is determined to ensure America remains the global leader in AI and energy.

Liberation Day Shakeup

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

Glenn drew a parallel between Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs and the historical post-World War II Liberation Day. Trump confirmed the analogy, explaining that his policy aims to dismantle an outdated global economic order established to rebuild Europe and Asia after the wars of the 20th century. While beneficial decades ago, this system now disadvantages the U.S. through job outsourcing, unfair trade deals, and disproportionate NATO contributions.

Trump stressed that America’s economic survival is at stake. Without swift action, the U.S. risks collapse, potentially dragging the West down with it. He views his presidency as a critical opportunity to reverse this decline.

Trouble in Europe

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / Contributor | Getty Images

When Glenn pressed Trump on his tariff strategy and negotiations with Europe, Trump delivered a powerful statement: “I don’t have to negotiate.” Despite America’s challenges, it remains the world’s leading economy with the wealthiest consumer base, making it an indispensable trading partner for Europe. Trump wants to make equitable deals and is willing to negotiate with European leaders out of respect and desire for shared prosperity, he knows that they are dependent on U.S. dollars to keep the lights on.

Trump makes an analogy, comparing America to a big store. If Europe wants to shop at the store, they are going to have to pay an honest price. Or go home empty-handed.

Need for Peace

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

Trump emphasized the need to end America’s involvement in endless wars, which have cost countless lives and billions of dollars without a clear purpose. He highlighted the staggering losses in Ukraine, where thousands of soldiers die weekly. Trump is committed to ending the conflict but noted that Ukrainian President Zelenskyy has been a challenging partner, constantly demanding more U.S. support.

The ongoing wars in Europe and the Middle East are unsustainable, and America’s excessive involvement has prolonged these conflicts, leading to further casualties. Trump aims to extricate the U.S. from these entanglements.

PHOTOS: Inside Glenn's private White House tour

Image courtesy of the White House

In honor of Trump's 100th day in office, Glenn was invited to the White House for an exclusive interview with the President.

Naturally, Glenn's visit wasn't solely confined to the interview, and before long, Glenn and Trump were strolling through the majestic halls of the White House, trading interesting historical anecdotes while touring the iconic home. Glenn was blown away by the renovations that Trump and his team have made to the presidential residence and enthralled by the history that practically oozed out of the gleaming walls.

Want to join Glenn on this magical tour? Fortunately, Trump's gracious White House staff was kind enough to provide Glenn with photos of his journey through the historic residence so that he might share the experience with you.

So join Glenn for a stroll through 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with the photo gallery below:

The Oval Office

  

Image courtesy of the White House

The Roosevelt Room

  

Image courtesy of the White House

The White House

  

Image courtesy of the White House

Trump branded a tyrant, but did Obama outdo him on deportations?

Genaro Molina / Contributor | Getty Images

MSNBC and CNN want you to think the president is a new Hitler launching another Holocaust. But the actual deportation numbers are nowhere near what they claim.

Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews, in an interview with CNN’s Jim Acosta, compared Trump’s immigration policies to Adolf Hitler’s Holocaust. He claimed that Hitler didn’t bother with German law — he just hauled people off to death camps in Poland and Hungary. Apparently, that’s what Trump is doing now by deporting MS-13 gang members to El Salvador.

Symone Sanders took it a step further. The MSNBC host suggested that deporting gang-affiliated noncitizens is simply the first step toward deporting black Americans. I’ll wait while you try to do that math.

The debate is about control — weaponizing the courts, twisting language, and using moral panic to silence dissent.

Media mouthpieces like Sanders and Matthews are just the latest examples of the left’s Pavlovian tribalism when it comes to Trump and immigration. Just say the word “Trump,” and people froth at the mouth before they even hear the sentence. While the media cries “Hitler,” the numbers say otherwise. And numbers don’t lie — the narrative does.

Numbers don’t lie

The real “deporter in chief” isn’t Trump. It was President Bill Clinton, who sent back 12.3 million people during his presidency — 11.4 million returns and nearly 900,000 formal removals. President George W. Bush, likewise, presided over 10.3 million deportations — 8.3 million returns and two million removals. Even President Barack Obama, the progressive darling, oversaw 5.5 million deportations, including more than three million formal removals.

So how does Donald Trump stack up? Between 2017 and 2021, Trump deported somewhere between 1.5 million and two million people — dramatically fewer than Obama, Bush, or Clinton. In his current term so far, Trump has deported between 100,000 and 138,000 people. Yes, that’s assertive for a first term — but it's still fewer than Biden was deporting toward the end of his presidency.

The numbers simply don’t support the hysteria.

Who's the “dictator” here? Trump is deporting fewer people, with more legal oversight, and still being compared to history’s most reviled tyrant. Apparently, sending MS-13 gang members — violent criminals — back to their country of origin is now equivalent to genocide.

It’s not about immigration

This debate stopped being about immigration a long time ago. It’s now about control — about weaponizing the courts, twisting language, and using moral panic to silence dissent. It’s about turning Donald Trump into the villain of every story, facts be damned.

If the numbers mattered, we’d be having a very different national conversation. We’d be asking why Bill Clinton deported six times as many people as Trump and never got labeled a fascist. We’d be questioning why Barack Obama’s record-setting removals didn’t spark cries of ethnic cleansing. And we’d be wondering why Trump, whose enforcement was relatively modest by comparison, triggered lawsuits, media hysteria, and endless Nazi analogies.

But facts don’t drive this narrative. The villain does. And in this script, Trump plays the villain — even when he does far less than the so-called heroes who came before him.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.