BLOG

Many Questions Remain Unanswered About Russia’s Election Interference

Why is special counsel Robert Mueller focusing on the White House’s response to Michael Flynn’s involvement with Russia instead of on Russia itself? Can we even trust the Department of Justice to conduct this investigation?

Glenn had a lot of questions on today’s show about the continued investigation into Russia’s attempts to interfere with the 2016 election. He wanted to know why the DOJ isn’t focusing on “the largest hostile intelligence operation” in our history.

“You know, the little thing when Russia attempted to interfere with the election?” he asked.

Listen to Glenn’s full monologue from today’s show above:

This article provided courtesy of TheBlaze.

GLENN: It’s time the Russia investigation was put on hold. At this point, the DoJ and FBI need to be investigating themselves rather than a case as critical as Russia.

It came out yesterday on Meet the Press that the special counsel was busy trying to piece together what happened inside the White House after senior officials were told Mike Flynn was susceptible to blackmail. Ok sounds good, but why is Muller still bogged down over that? Hand that off and get busy investigating - oh I don’t know - the largest hostile intelligence operation conducted against the United States IN OUR HISTORY. You know… that little thing when Russia attempted to interfere with the election. The crime you’re supposed to be concentrating on. Because last time I checked, the election happened months BEFORE the Trump transition period. If you see obstruction of justice there, GREAT - well not really great - but get someone else to take that on.

So back to the campaign and Russia. We STILL don’t know how a company like Fusion GPS became so influential in this investigation. Fusion GPS, a company that was employed by the Russians, The Clinton Campaign, and the DNC. Does it sound like the information you’d get from them might be JUST a little bit biased? Apparently, that knowledge was either lost on the FBI and DoJ or they just didn’t care because we now know that the FBI was trying to pay to have a Fusion GPS operative continue his work.

When the House Intelligence Committee began pushing Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein to answer to some of these things, they started to get a little pushback. Now, what possible motive would Rosenstein have for stonewalling Congress? It came out last week that senior DoJ Official Bruce Ohr, was demoted after it was found out that he had secret meetings with the head of Fusion GPS. That alone sounds bad, but that was sooo last week. Yesterday, Fox News reported that not only was Ohr holding secret meetings with Fusion GPS, but his wife was also working for them as well. She was employed by Fusion GPS while the Trump Dossier was being compiled. Before working at Fusion GPS she worked at a Washington think tank where her specialty was described as… a Russia expert.

Wanna take any guesses on where Ohr’s office was at the DoJ? Well low and behold… a few doors down from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Whether something nefarious happened here or not, you could very easily make the case that this was the reason the outlandish Trump Dossier was used to possibly get FISA warrants to spy on a presidential candidate. You could also make the case that the bias is so thick that it’s also the reason why the Special Counsel seems so hell-bent on proving obstruction of justice rather than finding out who was involved in possibly the worst foreign intelligence attack in our history.

So to the DoJ and FBI, can you get your houses in order? This is getting embarrassing. Someone needs to step up and figure out how we were so easily hacked and infiltrated by the Russians. I don’t care if it’s Joe Friday, Perry Mason or Jim Rockford… we need outside investigators. Time is running out.

Why Glenn Beck Dropped the F-BOMB After Biden’s SOTU Speech
RADIO

Why Glenn Beck Dropped the F-BOMB After Biden’s SOTU Speech

Glenn blew a gasket after President Biden’s 2024 State of the Union Address. During BlazeTV’s post-SOTU coverage, Glenn blasted Biden for using the speech to demean Republicans and the Supreme Court and flat-out lie to the American people. But then, he got a little colorful with his language. Glenn explains to his radio audience what Biden said to bring him to that moment: “How DARE [Biden] say that!” Glenn also discusses whether he regrets the outburst and whether Biden accomplished what he wanted with that infuriating speech.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, I always like to say, when I make a mistake, I like to lead with it. Last night, if you're watching TheBlaze, I said, which I heard as I was walking away, Stu say, I worked with him for almost 30 years and I've never seen him do that or say that.

I lost my cool. Is that how you would describe that?

STU: That would be an excellent summary of -- of that moment. Yes.

GLENN: Yes. Yes.

CFA. The three words that come to mind, when I'm losing my -- complete, colossal FA. CFA. I will -- I've never -- I don't think I've ever done that before.

STU: I don't think you have either.

GLENN: No. And it happened because I just want to explain this. It happened because I just walked away from the television, where I had been pacing like a caged animal. Because I was so angry at the lies and not only that, the childish rubbing people's noses in it.

You know, when -- when -- first of all, he said, within the first five minutes, that Donald Trump didn't care about the American people during COVID. He know didn't care. How dare you say that.

How dare you say that.

How dare anyone say that about you.

My gosh!

So it started there. And then he went in to rubbing Republican's noses, like in the border. Which was a complete lie.

We all know what caused -- why, on his day of inauguration, all of a sudden, the border surge started. Why?

95 executive orders, allowing it to happen. That's why.

And when he said, oh. You don't care about fentanyl. Oh, you -- oh, suddenly, you want to stop fentanyl coming in, so it stops killing our American -- and I know, and probably you know, if you've been listening this last week, the truth on what's happening with fentanyl. That's coming from China. It's intentionally. It's the opium wars, that Britain did to China.

Oh, so many years ago. They're using the same tactic on us. They are transporting all of the ingredients for fentanyl, over to one of their Chinese ports in Mexico.

It then goes to a small town in Mexico, where a thousand Chinese workers have been transported, and now set up shop, to where they cook the fentanyl. Then China sent over for the drug cartels. Sold them, at cost.

The presses. Because you need to make it look like fentanyl or Adderall, or whatever drug, and so they take the fentanyl, that the Chinese have put together. Cooked up.

Send it over.

Then the drug cartel uses the Chinese presses to make it look like Adderall. And that's what's killing our children. And the president knows it, and he won't say it. He won't stop it. Because he's in bed with China. How dare you!

And when he said, you don't care. Oh. Oh. Suddenly, you care about fentanyl.

Oh, I didn't know that now.

Oh, my gosh.

So I get on. And I'm asked just to do a rundown. And I have my notes. And I'm going true my notes. And I'm talking about it. And I'm trying to make good points. And then I know it's fun. I'm on for like five minutes. And Stu says, thanks, again. And you start to say something else. And I realize, I haven't really expressed what that was.

I -- no point that I made from my notes, really summed up what I felt the president did. And who he was, in that. And that's when I dropped the -- the CFA. Maybe more than once.

And I shouldn't have done that. Because I -- I -- I want to be a better person.

And, quite honestly, I'm glad I am on federally regulated broadcast airwaves today. Because it's why -- one of the reasons why I joined my church. I need strong framework to help me be a better man. And if I were on a podcast only today, I would not be a better man.

So I am grateful for the first time in my life, for the FCC, who will make sure I'm a better man today.

STU: Can we guarantee our affiliates that that mistake from last night, will not occur on this program?

GLENN: We're on a 37-minute delay now. Okay.

Yeah. So we tarted this show, 37 minutes ago.

Yeah. It -- it -- it won't happen. But, boy, do I feel it.

STU: Look, the frustration is understandable. I think we all felt it watching that. Because it's so egregious. And so overt. I mean, I was losing my mind on the economic stuff. Where this guy who fights and campaigns on wanting a shutdown, shuts down millions of businesses.

And/or cheers on, and/or votes on it.

Right? Like he's in support of all these policies.

Donald Trump wants to end them. He criticizes them, and says, he doesn't care about anyone. He wants to kill everybody by ending these policies. He gets into office, he wants to continue this shutdown over and over and over again.

Then finally the American people are like, screw you. We're going back to work, whether you like it or not. A year after this --

GLENN: A year after that, he lifts the ban. Remember, a year? We're still under that.

STU: Right. We didn't even realize that in Texas, for sure. He finally releases it. Everyone is going back to work. Then he stands on stage. And takes credit as a job creator.

I mean, the cynicism of that argument, is almost impossibly egregious.

It is like, if you try to give the most dishonest argument possible, you couldn't craft one better. Than what he did last night. The same thing --

GLENN: In every case.

STU: And he did over and over and over again, on many different topics. So while I appreciate your concern for your own restraint. Last night.

Every -- if you would have been able to put cameras, in everyone's houses watching that. You would have heard a lot of that same word. Everyone felt that way watching that.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

STU: Because he's not even trying to be honest.

He's not even trying to craft an argument that makes any sense.

The border argument, makes no sense.

As if we've all been on another planet for the last 50 years. And have no idea what about he thinks about the border.

Maybe he's been really tough on it.

And it's been Republicans, stopping him from securing it all this time.

What moron could possibly believe that argument?

GLENN: 60 percent of the American people. 60 percent of the American people.

STU: I hope it's --

GLENN: No. There are so many people that don't pay attention to the news.

STU: I don't even think it's that high right now. He's trying to increase it.

But what's the poll on his handling of the border? Eighteen percent approve?

It's -- luckily, I think people are seeing through it.

GLENN: He looked like a bumbling idiot. Last night, let's give honest reviews.

Last night, he did not look like a bumbling old man. He -- he -- yeah, he slurred his speech.

But by the time most people tuned out at the end of his speech, just because of anger or boredom. That's when he started getting really sloppy.

But he made several great -- I mean, I believe if I'm on his side, I would say, that's a great speech.

STU: Well, it was a great speech, because he didn't fall over. He didn't fall asleep.

GLENN: Yes, and he had several moments of, I will not budge!

STU: And while it feels so contrived to me.

I think he -- he -- he cleared that lowest hurdle, which the lowest hurdle was, he has to show he has some vigor, even if it's completely drug-induced.

He has to show -- so he did hit that standard, which is big for him.

Let's be honest. For him the biggest problem he has, in every single poll, much worse than even the border or Afghanistan or any of these other topics, is his age.

And everyone thinks he can't do this job. I still think he can't do this job. And I think last night proved it for policy reasons, among others.

But he did show that he was awake.

GLENN: Yeah. He did. He did. He did.

STU: And that was important.

GLENN: And if you're uninformed.

Or you just believe in all the same things that he does, then you thought he did a great job.

And, you know, you give credit where credit is due. He did not perform the way I thought he would perform, as a doddering old man. However, he always performs best in that setting.

STU: Yes. That's it. Look, his biggest moments have been the moments where he's been able to show this.

Debates are another one. He's typically shown up for debates. He hasn't been good in them.
He hasn't been as bad as he has been in every other scenario.

GLENN: Correct. Correct.

Glenn Beck's NUCLEAR Response to Biden's State of the Union
RADIO

Glenn Beck's NUCLEAR Response to Biden's State of the Union

President Biden’s 2024 State of the Union Address was infuriating for countless reasons. He lied to the American people about illegal immigration and the border, January 6th, IVF, the economy, inflation, Trump and COVID, and practically everything else he talked about. He also had the gall to chastise the Supreme Court for UPHOLDING the Constitution! At the end of BlazeTV's State of the Union Roast, Glenn goes nuclear on Biden’s lies, and in the end, there was only one thing Glenn could say to sum up how he felt...

How TERRIBLE Will Biden’s 2024 State of the Union Address Be?
RADIO

How TERRIBLE Will Biden’s 2024 State of the Union Address Be?

The New York Times has released a laughable report on how President Biden is prepping for his 2024 State of the Union address. Glenn, Pat, and Stu rip it apart for the propaganda that it is. They also give their predictions for just how geriatric this speech will be. Will Biden make it through the whole speech? How mockable will the "historic accomplishments" that he plans to highlight be? How many times will he blame Republicans and Donald Trump for his own failures? And will he address the big issues that Americans really care about, like the border and high crime?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Hmm. Wow. The New York Times has done some vigorous research and reporting on the State of the Union tonight. They write, fueled by throat-soothing tea, guided by teleprompters, and surrounded by six aides and one historian, President Biden spent hours at Camp David last weekend, honing a State of the Union speech that will be watched by one of the biggest audiences before the November election. Really? Really.

The final speech, which aides say will be edited up until Mr. Biden gives it, will be delivered by a president under pressure to reassure voters that he's not too old for the job.

So they talk about in the speech prep sessions. Now, I want you guys to hear. We're joined from Pat Gray from Pat Gray Unleashed. Pat, I want you to hear. Because this is different.

Listen to the rigor of this.

PAT: Okay.

GLENN: In speech press sessions, Mr. Biden goes through the material line by line.

STU: Whoa.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Yeah. He marks up words, and creates breaks to remind himself to navigate around a stutter, he's had since childhood.

PAT: Oh.

GLENN: If he lands on a passage that he does not think feels like something he would say, he marks it out.

STU: Wait. What?

PAT: No!

STU: Himself?

GLENN: Himself. One former speechwriter described this phase, as an exercise in trying to capture Mr. Biden's extemporaneous thoughts, and put them down on the page.

STU: That's the type of word he would skip --

GLENN: I would have X'ed that out.

PAT: Which, by the way, if he's doing it in advance, it's not extemporaneous. Can we go ahead and notice that?

STU: Thank you.

GLENN: We're trying to capture that.

STU: So basically, they're trying to fool us.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: They said that the president works hard and rigorously each year.

STU: Okay.

GLENN: Adding that he knows, it's his one chance to lay out an agenda every year for progress.

PAT: And show us just how vigorous he really is. I can't wait to see that.

STU: He works vigorously, once a year.

He works vigorously each year, is the quote.

GLENN: Yeah. Now, I will tell you, that incredible speech prep session that they have. Is what I would like to call speechwriting.

PAT: Uh-huh.

STU: Would you call it that, speechwriting?

The fact that he's kind of correcting some word?

GLENN: I would say, this is done by anybody who has ever spoken in public before.

STU: Right. And it's the last step in that process. What you're describing is the final checkoff.

GLENN: Yeah. He's not speechwriting. He's rehearsing. That's what he's doing.

STU: I don't like this part. I'll take that one out.

GLENN: I'm going to have a hard time with that one.

So let me separate this sentence.

That's not speechwriting, even. That's part of the speechwriting process.

STU: Yeah.

PAT: Which means there will also be three words that are spoken tonight. Because he has a problem with all of it. There are about three words that he can say.

GLENN: Except with this particular thing. I don't know what they do to him. But I think he's got a cocktail.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: Like crazy.

STU: Yeah. I agree.

And I will say, of all the problems that Joe Biden has, the highest profile of vets are not his worst moments. Would you agree with that.

He's almost like, you know, he gets up for the big games a little bit. Now, I think drugs are probably involved in that process.

His problems almost always are, he's just like walking by, you know -- like in an ice cream store, and there's cameras there.

And he looks like a complete idiot.

It's not usually those big moments like, okay. He has to nail this.

He's usually bad in those moments. But not catastrophic.

PAT: I think he will be tonight. Maybe I'm wrong.

But I don't see how it's avoidable.

GLENN: Dr. Nick has already been called. He's already been called. He's probably got the IV running through him.

PAT: No. I'm sure. I'm sure.

This speech is usually almost an hour.

Sometimes it even exceeds that.

If he cuts it down to five minutes, maybe -- he can't get through an hour. There's no way. There's no way.

STU: He couldn't get through an hour last year. He was bad through the last half of that. But he got through the first 20 minutes or so, okay. For him.

And that was enough. Most people tuned out.

You know, I was listening to Karine Jean-Pierre doing an interview this morning. Which is always an adventure.

And, of course, first of all, they were saying. They asked a specific question.

Is he preparing for, like, hecklers, like if there are Republican hecklers?

GLENN: Oh, yeah. Oh, he's got some great one-liners, I will bet.

STU: There are massive reporting saying he is, right?

Of course, she denies it. Says, he is not doing that. Yet another lie.

But they went back to -- and what about last year?

He had that amazing response last year. I'm like, amazing response to the hecklers?

I don't understand this. They play it back.

The Republicans want to get rid of Social Security.

The Republicans go, no. No.

I don't know if that should be the Republican position. They go, no. No. No.

Oh, well, I guess we all agree now.

That Social Security is -- is off the books.


PAT: That was the amazing --

STU: That was literally the clip they pull, to highlight how good he is.

PAT: My gosh.

STU: Now, I think it was off the table. So it didn't even say the right thing.

All the books. What the hell are you talking about?

GLENN: Of course. There are a lot of the things off the books in Washington. That's the problem.

STU: Make sure this is off the books.

This is supposed to be a different speech.

Amazing. That's his good moment? But I will say, compared to him on a daily basis, in these moments, he's been a D minus instead of an F.

GLENN: He's going to know how to get off the stage. Tonight, he will know.

STU: Probably.

PAT: You think? He might need a little help. But he might be able to get off the stage with assistance. Some kind of assistance. Jill will be there.

GLENN: They have three stairs up to the -- they put a chair lift.

STU: That would be awesome.

PAT: That would be hysterical.

STU: Because that was the Bill Maher thing. Did I see this? He should just lead into this. Yeah, I'm old. But I'm better than that guy.

That should be his campaign. He should come out with one of the stair rails. And come up on the stage.

PAT: That's funny.

GLENN: You know who would do that?

Donald Trump. Donald Trump --

STU: He always --

GLENN: He leans into it.

STU: Go for it. When he's on with like Sean Hannity. And he's like, well, you would never, obviously, become a dictator.

Yeah. I would! Day one.

I'm a dictator, that's me.

But that is what he does.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: He's a "yes, and" guy. He's like, when you go to improv class. Never say no, when you're in the middle of an improv class. Say yes, and. Then come with up with a scenario.

That's what he does.

Again, I would totally be a dictator. Let me tell you the ten things I would do. He leans in.

PAT: The problem is, they bought into that. Anything he says, they naturally pick up on, even when he's just doing funny things.

GLENN: Let me ask you this: What will he address?

Will he address the border.

And will it only be a blame on Republicans?

PAT: A blame on Republicans.

STU: Yes and yes. Same thing with the economy. Same thing with shrinkflation.

PAT: And we will hear the 14 million job number he created.

STU: Fact-check, by the way, to give credit. Fact-checked him on that a million times.

It is a lie.

PAT: It's garbage.

STU: Same thing with the deficit number. That it's a lie.

GLENN: How could he possibly say he's cutting the deficit, when we are spending 1 trillion dollars over budget, every 100 days.

STU: He's a liar.

GLENN: Okay.

All right.

STU: So it's very easy for him to do that.

Because he doesn't care if it's true or not.

When you separate yourself from the truth. You can separate yourself from anything.

PAT: And it's like the other day, when he was asked about the poll numbers, and how bad they are.

Check the polls, Jack.

Five in a row. I'm beating him. Five in a row. Nobody can find one in a row.

I mean, maybe one, from a while ago. But mostly, he's losing in almost every poll.

STU: He's led in two recent polls over the past, let's see --

GLENN: Would you do me a favor?

Would you write -- would you read those three times? I got six in a row.

STU: These are since the 21st of February. Going back then. Trump plus six. Trump plus two. Trump plus four. Trump plus two. Trump plus four. Biden plus one.

Trump plus four. Biden plus one. Trump plus two. Those are the recent polls. And he's obviously not winning --

PAT: It's just a flatout lie. Just a flatout lie.

GLENN: So what happens if Trump wins by two?

STU: Oh, my God. What happens if Biden wins by two?

STU: I can't even imagine how the country reacts to a situation like that.

GLENN: I know. That should be --

PAT: That's scary.

GLENN: For all Nikki Haley people, that are just like, I'm not going to vote for him. I'm not going to vote for him. You have to.

STU: They got -- everybody has to relax on that. Like if people are -- if people -- there are certain people who will never vote for Donald Trump. If they're not across that line, and they're leaning Republican, they will come back. It's eight months of hearing Joe Biden. Don't freak out. People freak out about it. Like, the Nikki Hailey voter generally, isn't even a Nikki Haley voter. Most of them are just protest votes against Trump. They're not being big fans of Trump.

GLENN: Yeah. Many of them are -- are Democrats.

STU: Many of them are Democrats. Many of them are independents. Now, of course, in a general election, by the way, we do need to get some independents and Democrats. A lot of people seem to forget that.

GLENN: I agree.

STU: You do need those people. I don't think the approach of just mocking and belittling everyone who didn't vote for you. Is necessarily the right approach here.

But you have eight months. It probably works itself out. The question is, can you get the people who didn't vote at all, in these primaries.

Or people who are in the middle, and are considering you. Can you win those people over?

GLENN: Do you think any of the people will be watching it tonight. Other than the people like us, addicted to the news.

Or in our case, paid to watch the news.

STU: Yes!

GLENN: I mean, I just don't see this being a big audience.

PAT: I wouldn't. If I don't have to. It's too aggravating. It just enrages me. So I would skip it.

GLENN: Yeah. We're doing our coverage tonight.

STU: The coverage tonight, will be really fun. Glenn, you will be on.

We also have Dave Landau on. Michael Malice is going to be on. Sarah Gonzalez. Jason Buttrill will be on.

Talking about a new documentary we are doing. It is going to be a really fun. It's a roast.

We're not doing -- oh, let's get into the numbers.

No, well, we will fact-check live as well. But we will just be mocking Joe Biden relentlessly.

GLENN: Well, that's not right.

STU: Unless he does a great job.

GLENN: Like you know exactly how he's going to perform tonight. What he will say.

STU: I tend the rates will be up for this one.

State of the Unions in all the other years. The nonelection years. They're for political nerds. But we are getting into election season. Everyone knows what the match will be. I think this one might be a little higher rated.

GLENN: They say this is going to be the highest rated -- this is what the New York Times said, the highest, the biggest audience he'll have, until the November election.

That's possible.

Because they won't cover anything else that he does, long form.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: This might be the longest form thing he does, until the election.

STU: I think you're probably right on that. And I think too. When you look at the ratings at the end of the day, you can't just add up what you see on the networks.

Because not only, you know, we're doing coverage. I mean, Donald Trump is doing some alternate coverage now. A lot of people -- this is a very wide split audience.

I would watch this, but I would watch it on BlazeTV.

I would want to watch it be mocked.

GLENN: Yeah, I wouldn't watch him on ABC. Even Fox. I just wouldn't be watching it.

What New York’s National Guard Subway Deployment is REALLY About
RADIO

What New York’s National Guard Subway Deployment is REALLY About

New York Governor Kathy Hochul is sending 750 National Guard troops to New York City’s subways to crack down on violence. But is a pseudo-military state really the best solution? How about New York just ENFORCE ITS LAWS and jail criminals instead? Glenn shares 2 stories to illustrate this: In New York, 4 people have been released back into their communities, despite being accused of hacking up human bodies. Meanwhile in Florida, cops are actually arresting and jailing criminals. Glenn also asks, will Biden talk about ANY of this during his State of the Union speech?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. So Kathy Hochul has decided that she's going to put a thousand National Guard troops, to check bags, in the New York City subway system.

Wow. That's wonderful. Crime in the subway, is up 45 percent, year on year.

45 percent increase. Okay. So that's probably not, you know, really that great.

So she sends 750 uniformed National Guard soldiers, with orders to search bags for weapons, and other dangerous stuff. So isn't that top and frisk, Stu?

Stu, I think that is. So you have the National Guard, in the subways of New York.

I don't know if you notice. But the National Guard comes with big weapons.

And uniforms. So they're in our subways.

And that's going to help on crime.

By showing a military presence in New York. You know, the first time I ever saw military presence in the United States, off of a base, was in New York, right after 9/11.

And there was marshal law, in the lower part of Manhattan.

You didn't go in or out.

And there were Humvees. And everybody was in uniform and had a machine gun.

It was ugly. It was ugly.

And it was so disturbing to see that on the streets of America. I had never seen it before. I don't know if people are just used to seeing this. In New York.

I know they wouldn't elsewhere.

But we're not used to seeing the military, policing in New York.

So they are going to be in the subways. And she says, that's going to help, you know, with the -- with -- with crime in the subways.

Okay. Well, there's another way to do that. I don't know if she thought of this.

Listen to this story.

Four people were arrested in connection to three incidents of human remains being found on Long Island.

Okay?

This is just outside of New York City.

Police made the arrest after performing a search warrant on an apartment in Amityville, shared by three of the suspects.

Forty-year-old Amanda Wallace, 44-year-old Steven Brown, 38-year-old Jeffrey Mackey. Investigations say they found human remains and cutting tools, including a used meat cleaver.

A fourth suspect was also identified as 33-year-old Alexis Nevus (phonetic), a homeless woman.

Now, the body parts, apparently, belonged to an unidentified, 59-year-old woman and a 53-year-old man.

The names of the victims have not been released. But what happened was these guys, somehow or another, got a hold of these bodies.

Oh. We just found two of the dead bodies. And hacked them all up, and then went around in parks. And just left a lake here. A hand here.

A head over here. Like Easter egg for crazy people. Easter hunting.

STU: What else are you supposed to do in that situation.

GLENN: Right.

STU: If you're just walking around. See a body somewhere. You will hack it up. And leave it various parts.

GLENN: All four. Now, remember, uncle is putting National Guard, kind of an extreme measure. In the subways.

All four were charged on Wednesday. With first degree hindering prosecution, tampering with physical evidence.

And concealment of a human corpse.

They all pleaded not guilty. However -- however, they have not been charged with a killing of the two victims, but in the investigation, it's pending. And more charges will be forthcoming.

So what happened?

They were charged, and then ordered to not leave Suffolk county.

And they're on supervised release now.

So...

So just people who are dismembering people.

STU: So they can still walk around Suffolk county. And do anything they can do. They just shouldn't leave Suffolk county.

GLENN: Right. And they're not going to.

STU: That's good. How else will you find these bodies?

You need some people out there looking for these bodies, to find them and hack them up and put them in different parks, if they happen to come across them.

GLENN: Right. Now, let me ask you.

Wouldn't it be better, to put the people, who are charged with crimes, even grisly heinous crimes, into jail, and not let them right back out on the street?

Just saying. That's an idea.

STU: Well, I think the problem with that idea, is that bodies will pile up everywhere.

We're already going to see this happen in Nassau County. Now that they can't cross the line, what will happen there?

GLENN: I don't know. I don't know.

Let me give another story. Florida sheriff says he found evidence that illegal aliens were using federal flight vouchers in order to aid human trafficking. Across the US border, during a law enforcement operation.

Polk County sheriff Grady Judd, applauded his deputies for arresting 228 people, during a massive multi-agency operation, named Operation March Madness -- sorry, Operation March Sadness, 2024.
Among those arrested in the operation were teachers, coaches, medical professionals, active military service members, and 21 illegal aliens.

So at least there weren't the four people that were chopping people up in the park.

He came out and said, we have a crisis at the border.

And because of the crisis at the border, we have people that are victimizing illegal folks. Forcing them into the sex trade. Because we allow these criminals into the country illegally, we all rail about it, but nobody does anything.

Judge said, one suspect had brought three female illegal aliens to Florida from New York. They said, when they came into the country, illegally, the DHS, Department of Homeland Security, gave them a form, an ID. Paperwork.

And allowed them to fly for free anywhere in America.

You know how Southwest Airlines will let your bags fly for free.

Federal government will let your immigrants fly for free said the sheriff.

The victim said, they were forced to pay back $3,000 to the female human trafficker, under the threat of violence.

They tell us that they fly into major metro centers for free on the federal government's dime.
Whether they set up their appointment -- then they set up their appointments for sex, all over the country.

So we know this is happening.

As I told you last hour.

We know fentanyl is coming in over the border.

And it's all done by China.

In fact, China just found this old recipe.

And they're making it. Now, it was discovered in the 1950s, as a pain relief agent. And doctors saw it. Because it is like first time addiction, and possible death. When it's made in the lab, under the right circumstances, they said there was no medical reason for this to ever be made.

And so they went back into the shelf of the pharmaceutical companies. Back in 1950 something.

And guess who just found it?

China. And so now they're making it. And so now they're making it. And they're making it for all of the lovely people, that are coming across from the drug cartels into our country. Isn't that great?

Is Biden going to talk about any of this. Any of of it?

He's going to talk about the border tonight, in the State of the Union address. And he's going to blame it on the Republicans.

They just didn't want to solve the problem. No. What you wanted to solve, was something we've debated about for decades now.

Do we just make everybody a citizen?

No. That's not what we -- what we were trying to solve

We're trying to solve the invasion from the southern, and now northern border.

From places like China.

But he's not going to talk about that.

He has to blame the Republicans. Because when you talk about drugs, and all the people that are dying of fentanyl, there's only one person to blame. The Chinese, getting into bed with the drug cartels, intentionally, doing an opium war on us.

And who is responsible for that happening? Anybody, who allows illegals and the drug cartels to rule our border.

That's the president. But he can't say anything.

Get this: Newly disclosed emails show a Chinese businessman, who partnered with Hunter Biden's Burnum Firm, was primarily motivated by access rather than financial considerations, bolstering the House Oversight Committee's contention that the Biden name was the commodity.

Now, this is quite amazing. It was found just the news, is reporting this.

And it was part of the testimony of the Oversight Committee. And Hunter Biden had business meetings with his firm.

And a -- another firm, run by, I think his name is Henry Zhao.

And they were looking to merge Burnum, that's his firm -- with Harvest, which is the Chinese Communist Party firm. And they were going to get all kinds of access to the markets. Okay?

Nobody has ever been given this kind of access to Chinese markets before. Ever. Not Goldman Sachs. No one.

He got it. And nobody was really asking why. How did that happen?

Okay. So the team, Hunter's team wanted to let Zhao know that we're on track, for some really good things, and a kind of a thank you, after this meeting.

Here is the letter. We're excited by the prospect of being able to work side by side with Harvest by way of a globally recognized platform.

Please, pass along my regards to Henry. And know that -- and tell him, what we discussed during our last lunch together in Beijing, still holds true.

And, Michael, please also remind Henry of our conversation about a board seat for a certain relation of mine.

Devon and I golfed with that relation, earlier last week. And we discussed this very idea again. And as always, he remains very keen on the opportunity.

Now, he also admitted under oath, this last week, that, yes. The big guy is his dad.

What -- this isn't -- this isn't some small crime.

There are 133 Chinese that have come across our border, in the last three years.

30,000 of them in -- since October. We don't know who they are. These are the ones we caught. All military-aged men. In fact, there are now more Chinese people, coming in. Not families. Chinese guys, coming in across the border, in California. Than Mexicans.

And are we doing anything to stop it?

No. No. The Biden administration for some reason said, look, we just got to shorten this. Forty-four questions that you have to ask.

You know, if you -- if you stop an illegal alien. Forty-four questions. Let's narrow that down. I think it's to seven. Seven questions.

From 44 to seven. But only for the Chinese.

What? Why?

You need to know that in the State of the Union tonight, he's not going to tell you anything that is real.

It's going to be blame.

But know that something is very, very wrong.

And when you talk about crime, he's probably going to say that crime has gone down. Remember, the national guard, that Hochul has just put into the subways.

Why would they do that? If crime was going down? If crime was fine?

Who is -- what Republican has had anything to do with New York or Chicago, in forever?

So how does that work?

How are -- how are cities collapsing, under the weight, because they are sanctuary cities. How is that the fault of the Republican Party?

I'm not looking for fault.

I'm looking for someone to, actually, fix it.

And this administration is doing nothing, but empowering all the people that would love to see us live in chaos.