Beck for president? Glenn casually hints at possible presidential run in 8-12 years

Was he just testing us to see if we were listening?

Or did Glenn really say he might run for president of the United States in 8-12 years?

Watch the clip below and see for yourself.

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors.

GLENN: So we were talking, and Pat said he had the answer on how to solve the ISIS thing if he were president of the United States.

PAT: Yes, I'd go with the Marcus Luttrell plan.

GLENN: Uh-huh. Which is?

PAT: Which is Marcus gathers about 300 of his closest, most personal SEAL friends. You untie their hands. You remove all the rules of engagement. You say, "We're not going to pay a bit of attention to what you do. You just go." And they kill every single member of ISIS. You give them six months, and they kill every member --

GLENN: Now, Stu laughs at that.

STU: That's awesome.

GLENN: You're not laughing -- because that's exactly what I would do.

STU: Yeah, I mean, I don't imagine -- it certainly wouldn't happen under this administration.

PAT: No, it would not.

STU: Or probably, I mean, as far as no restrictions and we won't pay attention --

GLENN: I've told you guys this, I don't think I've said this on the air. In eight to 12 years, I'm thinking about running for president of the United States.

STU: Oh, yeah?

PAT: In eight to 12?

GLENN: In eight to 12.

PAT: You're going to be pretty old at 12.

STU: Yeah.

PAT: You might want to make it eight.

GLENN: Pretty old in 12? I'll be in my 60s.

STU: Yeah, that's actually pretty young for the Democrats.

PAT: Yeah.

STU: You think you can run as a Democrat because you'd be like the youthful alternative?

PAT: Wouldn't that be funny?

GLENN: For the love of Pete...

PAT: You would guarantee a Republican victory if you run as a Democrat.

STU: Yeah, that's true.

PAT: This is a really good idea. I say we investigate this. That's not what you wanted to hear.

GLENN: That's not what I wanted to hear.

JEFFY: Eight years. Let's get that done.

PAT: Yeah. You'll run in eight to 12 years. And?

GLENN: Then if there's anything left, that's when we will unleash Marcus and his friends. If there's anything left and we have eight years of -- of this --

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: -- that's when we just unleash -- we unleash every SEAL. We dig them up. We dig them up and we restart their hearts.

STU: I think if you wait eight years with ISIS, they'll have about a quarter of the globe.

GLENN: Yeah, it will be too late. But. Honestly this weekend I was thinking, "If I was president, what would I do?" And that was part of it. But the other part is, we have to find a way to short-circuit their prophecy. And this is why when anybody says, "This has nothing to do with Islam," you have to impress on them, it has everything to do with Islam. And unless you understand that --

PAT: Especially to them.

GLENN: Yeah, you'll not be able to defeat them. If you keep denying this has anything to do with Islam, you will continue to miss -- like their latest video that talks all about the prophecy.

Americans are losing faith in our justice system and the idea that legal consequences are applied equally — even to powerful elites in office.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) joined Glenn Beck on the radio program to detail what he believes will come next with the Durham investigation, which hopefully will provide answers to the Obama FBI's alleged attempts to sabotage former President Donald Trump and his campaign years ago.

Rep. Nunes and Glenn assert that we know Trump did NOT collude with Russia, and that several members of the FBI possibly committed huge abuses of power. So, when will we see justice?

Watch the video clip below:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

The corporate media is doing everything it can to protect Dr. Anthony Fauci after Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) roasted him for allegedly lying to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

During an extremely heated exchange at a Senate hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Paul challenged Dr. Fauci — who, as the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, oversees research programs at the National Institute of Health — on whether the NIH funded dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Dr. Fauci denied the claims, but as Sen. Paul knows, there are documents that prove Dr. Fauci's NIH was funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan biolab before COVID-19 broke out in China.

On "The Glenn Beck Program," Glenn and Producer Stu Burguiere presented the proof, because Dr. Fauci's shifting defenses don't change the truth.

Watch the video clip below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Critical race theory: A special brand of evil

wal_172619/Pixabay

Part of what makes it hard for us to challenge the left is that their beliefs are complicated. We don't mean complicated in a positive way. They aren't complicated the way love is complicated. They're complicated because there's no good explanation for them, no basis in reality.

The left cannot pull their heads out of the clouds. They are stuck on romantic ideas, abstract ideas, universal ideas. They talk in theories. They see the world through ideologies. They cannot divorce themselves from their own academic fixations. And — contrary to what they believe and how they act — it's not because leftists are smarter than the rest of us. And studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country. Marx was no different. The Communist Manifesto talks about how the rise of cities "rescued a considerable part of the population from the idiocy of rural life."

Studies have repeatedly shown that leftists are the least happy people in the country.

Instead of admitting that they're pathological hypocrites, they tell us that we're dumb and tell us to educate ourselves. Okay, so we educate ourselves; we return with a coherent argument. Then they say, "Well, you can't actually understand what you just said unless you understand the work of this other obscure Marxist writer. So educate yourselves more."

It's basically the "No True Scotsman" fallacy, the idea that when you point out a flaw in someone's argument, they say, "Well, that's a bad example."

After a while, it becomes obvious that there is no final destination for their bread-crumb trail. Everything they say is based on something that somebody else said, which is based on something somebody else said.

Take critical race theory. We're sure you've noticed by now that it is not evidence-based — at all. It is not, as academics say, a quantitative method. It doesn't use objective facts and data to arrive at conclusions. Probably because most of those conclusions don't have any basis in reality.

Critical race theory is based on feelings. These feelings are based on theories that are also based on feelings.

We wanted to trace the history of critical race theory back to the point where its special brand of evil began. What allowed it to become the toxic, racist monster that it is today?

Later, we'll tell you about some of the snobs who created critical theory, which laid the groundwork for CRT. But if you follow the bread-crumb trail from their ideas, you wind up with Marxism.

For years, the staff has devoted a lot of time to researching Marxism. We have read a lot of Marx and Marxist writing. It's part of our promise to you to be as informed as possible, so that you know where to go for answers; so that you know what to say when your back is up against the wall. What happens when we take the bread-crumb trail back farther, past Marxism? What is it based on?

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism.

It's actually based on the work of one of the most important philosophers in human history, a 19th-century German philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel.

This is the point where Marxism became Marxism and not just extra-angry socialism. And, as you'll see in just a bit, if we look at Hegel's actual ideas, it's obvious that Marx completely misrepresented them in order to confirm his own fantasies.

So, in a way, that's where the bread-crumb trail ends: With Marx's misrepresentation of an incredibly important, incredibly useful philosophy, a philosophy that's actually pretty conservative.

This post is part of a series on critical race theory. Read the full series here.

We've heard a lot about critical race theory lately, and for good reason: It's a racist ideology designed to corrupt our children and undermine our American values. But most of what we see are the results of a process that has been underway for decades. And that's not something the mainstream media, the Democrat Party, and even teachers unions want you to know. They're doing everything in their power to try and convince you that it's no big deal. They want to sweep everything under the rug and keep you in the dark. To fight it, we need to understand what fuels it.

On his Wednesday night special this week, Glenn Beck exposes the deep-seated Marxist origins of CRT and debunks the claims that it's just a harmless term for a school of legal scholarship. Newsweek opinion editor Josh Hammer joins to argue why we must ban critical race theory from our schools if we want to save a very divided nation.

Watch the full "Glenn TV" episode below:

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.