Many Voters Have Already Conquered the Mountain of Accepting Trump's Behavior

Outrage over Trump's 2005 comments about women reached a fever pitch over the weekend, with key Republicans calling for him to step down. But what about the electorate? How will Trump's offensive comments impact his voters?

Read below or watch the clip for answers to these acceptable questions:

• What's with the Democratic fly on the wall, so to speak?

• Did revelations about Trump cause fireworks at the debate?

• What was the number one post-debate story on Drudge?

• Should locker talk be reserved for adolescent teenagers?

• Is it okay to call your daughter a piece of ass? Ever?

Below is a rush transcript of this segment, it might contain errors:

PAT: One of the top -- top stories on Drudge is that a fly landed on Hillary during the debate last night. Did you notice that?

JEFFY: Yeah.

STU: That was very brief.

PAT: Very brief. She just kind of swatted it away. But is that supposed to mean that she's Satan or something? That flies are attracted to --

JEFFY: That flies are attracted to...

STU: Because it's funny, that happened to Barack Obama a few times.

PAT: Yeah, it did. In fact, he caught it with his hand or something. Right? Didn't he grab one?

STU: The odd thing about the thing with Obama was that he let it like crawl around on his face --

PAT: That was the weird thing. She didn't.

STU: Create a nest. Start a family.

I mean, it was a weird -- those were weird -- this was just like, it landed for a second. She kind of shushed it away. But it was a weird debate last night.

PAT: It was.

STU: And you kind of were expecting some huge fireworks. I would say, largely speaking, you didn't get that. Again, I think that's a positive for Trump. I think the Democrat strategists today are saying, look, eh, we could have probably knocked him out. But I don't think we hurt ourselves here. I think that's probably true. And I think Trump is saying -- well, I mean, I don't know what Trump is saying. But Republican strategists who are thinking about maybe pulling their endorsements are probably saying, "Look, the tape is bad. Let's see if there's more tapes. He didn't convince us last night to leave."

He probably -- if you didn't unendorse yesterday or over the weekend, why would you do it after the debate? There's no additional reason to do it. Why not wait at this point?

PAT: Yeah. Exactly. And all the Trump apologists are doing the same thing that you knew they were going to do. They don't care about this. This doesn't matter. She's still worse. All of that stuff: Everybody does it. Every man talks this way.

And is that -- is that true? Does every -- everybody -- I don't know anybody who talks that way.


PAT: I don't have anybody in my life who says those things to me or I say them to them.

JEFFY: That's what I was thinking earlier.

PAT: I don't know anybody.

STU: You don't know any stars. Stars --

JEFFY: Right. But there's a big difference, right? Between men. She looks really --

PAT: They said it was just boy talk. Right? Just locker room talk. But when was the last time you did locker room talk like he did when he was 59 years old? Were you 12? Were you 14? Come on.

JEFFY: And my locker room talk was a lot different than that. I mean, I wasn't talking about actually going out and grabbing, you know what I mean? I was talking about going --

PAT: Right. Yeah. Yeah.

Yes. You talked about girls, but hopefully not like that.

JEFFY: Yeah.

STU: Again, this is a video, and it makes it -- it hits people harder. But, I mean, this is -- if you're voting for Donald Trump, isn't this priced into your decision already?

JEFFY: Yes, it should be.

STU: The guy has obviously been saying these things for numerous decades.


STU: Obviously. He was saying them -- you know -- you know, what was the quote about -- I mean, he calls -- been calling women a piece of ass. He's been. Saying --

PAT: Supposedly gave Stern permission to call his daughter that.

JEFFY: Of course.

STU: You know, he's --

PAT: Would you -- come on. You have a daughter now. You both -- we all have daughters.

STU: Of course not.

PAT: Would you ever say to anybody, including Stern, "Yeah, that's fine. You can call her a piece of ass if you want to." Come on!

STU: Of course not. But that's my point here, is that if -- if you can vote for someone who would do these sorts of things --

PAT: Oh, man.

STU: -- why would this tape change your mind?

PAT: It wouldn't.

STU: This was all on record. I think there's a level of emotional impact when you hear him actually say it.

JEFFY: Yeah.

STU: Because there are dozens and dozens of times in biographies of him, in articles about him, in pornographic magazines, where he's quoted saying very similar things. Where he -- when he was on Howard Stern. I mean, there -- we talked about a long time ago -- there was an article that came out, the 25 terrible things Donald Trump said about women on Howard Stern.

This was an article by I think it was Buzzfeed who did it. It was out in the primary season.

PAT: Uh-huh.

STU: People heard that stuff. And that's priced in. Even if you don't like it, you've already -- you've conquered that mountain of accepting that behavior.

Featured Image: Republican nominee Donald Trump (R) discusses with is daughter Ivanka Trump (2nR) his wife Melania Trump (2nd L) and his daugher in law Lara Yunaska (L) after the second presidential debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri on October 9, 2016. (Photo Credit: RICK WILKING/AFP/Getty Images)

5 SURPRISING ways space tech is used in your daily life

NASA / Handout | Getty Images

Is your vacuum cleaner from SPACE?

This week, Glenn is discussing his recent purchase of a Sputnik satellite, which has got many of us thinking about space and space technology. More specifically, we've been wondering how technology initially designed for use outside Earth's atmosphere impacted our lives down here on terra firma. The U.S. spent approximately $30 billion ($110 billion in today's money) between the Soviet launch of Sputnik in 1957 and the Moon Landing in 1969. What do we have to show for it besides some moon rocks?

As it turns out, a LOT of tech originally developed for space missions has made its way into products that most people use every day. From memory foam to cordless vacuums here are 5 pieces of space tech that you use every day:

Cellphone camera

LOIC VENANCE / Contributor | Getty Images

Have you ever seen a photograph of an early camera, the big ones with the tripod and curtain, and wondered how we went from that to the tiny little cameras that fit inside your cellphone? Thank NASA for that brilliant innovation. When you are launching a spaceship or satellite out of the atmosphere, the space onboard comes at a premium. In order to make more room for other equipment, NASA wanted smaller, lighter cameras without compromising image quality, and the innovations made to accomplish this goal paved the way for the cameras in your phone.

Cordless vacuums and power tools

Education Images / Contributor | Getty Images

When exploring the moon, NASA wanted astronauts to use a drill to collect samples from the lunar surface. The problem: the moon has a severe lack of electrical outlets to power the drills. NASA tasked Black & Decker with developing a battery-powered motor powerful enough to take chunks out of the moon. The resulting motor was later adapted to power cordless power tools and vacuums in households across America.

Infrared ear thermometer

BSIP / Contributor | Getty Images

What do distant stars and planets have in common with your eardrum? Both have their temperature read by the same infrared technology. The thermometers that can be found in medicine cabinets and doctors' offices across the world can trace their origins back to the astronomers at NASA who came up with the idea to measure the temperature of distant objects by the infrared light they emit.

Grooved pavement

Bob Riha Jr / Contributor | Getty Images

This one may seem obvious, but sometimes you need a massively complicated problem to come up with simple solutions. During the Space Shuttle program, NASA had a big problem: hydroplaning. Hydroplaning is dangerous enough when you are going 70 miles an hour in your car, but when you're talking about a Space Shuttle landing at about 215 miles per hour, it's an entirely different animal. So what was NASA's space-age solution? Cutting grooves in the pavement to quickly divert water off the runway, a practice now common on many highways across the world.

Memory foam

BERTRAND LANGLOIS / Stringer | Getty Images

If you've ever slept on a memory foam mattress, it probably won't come as a shock to find out that the foam was created to cushion falls from orbit. Charles Yotes was an astronautical engineer who is credited with the invention of memory foam. Yotes developed the technology for the foam while working on the recovery system for the Apollo command module. The foam was originally designed to help cushion the astronauts and their equipment during their descent from space. Now, the space foam is used to create some of the most comfortable mattresses on Earth. Far out.

5 most HORRIFIC practices condoned by WPATH

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Whatever you know about the "trans movement" is only the tip of the iceberg.

In a recent Glenn TV special, Glenn delved into Michael Schellenberger's "WPATH files," a collection of leaked internal communications from within the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). Glenn's research team got their hands on the WPATH files and compiled the highlights in Glenn's exclusive PDF guide which can be downloaded here. These documents reveal the appalling "standards" created and upheld by WPATH, which appear to be designed to allow radical progressive surgeons to perform bizarre, experimental, and mutilating surgeries on the dime of insurance companies rather than to protect the health and well-being of their patients. These disturbing procedures are justified in the name of "gender-affirming care" and are defended zealously as "life-saving" by the dogmatic surgeons who perform them.

The communications leaked by Schellenberger reveal one horrific procedure after another committed in the name of and defended by radical gender ideology and WPATH fanatics. Here are five of the most horrifying practices condoned by WPATH members:

1.Trans surgeries on minors as young as 14

One particular conversation was initiated by a doctor asking for advice on performing irreversible male-to-female surgery on a 14-year-old boy's genitals. WPATH doctors chimed in encouraging the surgery. One doctor, Dr. McGinn, confessed that he had performed 20 such surgeries on minors over the last 17 years!

2.Amputation of healthy, normal limbs

BIID, or Body Integrity Identity Disorder, is an “extremely rare phenomenon of persons who desire the amputation of one or more healthy limbs or who desire a paralysis.” As you might suspect, some WPATH members are in favor of enabling this destructive behavior. One WPATH commenter suggested that people suffering from BIID received "hostile" treatment from the medical community, many of whom would recommend psychiatric care over amputation. Apparently, telling people not to chop off perfectly healthy limbs is now considered "violence."

3.Trans surgeries on patients with severe mental illnesses

WPATH claims to operate off of a principle known as "informed consent," which requires doctors to inform patients of the risks associated with a procedure. It also requires patients be in a clear state of mind to comprehend those risks. However, this rule is taken very lightly among many WPATH members. When one of the so-called "gender experts" asked about the ethicality of giving hormones to a patient already diagnosed with several major mental illnesses, they were met with a tidal wave of backlash from their "enlightened" colleges.

4.Non-standard procedures, such as “nullification” and other experimental, abominable surgeries

If you have never heard of "nullification" until now, consider yourself lucky. Nullification is the removal of all genitals, intending to create a sort of genderless person, or a eunuch. But that's just the beginning. Some WPATH doctors admitted in these chatlogs that they weren't afraid to get... creative. They seemed willing to create "custom" genitals for these people that combine elements of the two natural options.

5.Experimental, untested, un-researched, use of carcinogenic drugs 

Finasteride is a drug used to treat BPH, a prostate condition, and is known to increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer as well as breast cancer. Why is this relevant? When a WPATH doctor asked if anyone had used Finasteride "to prevent bottom growth," which refers to the healthy development of genitals during puberty. The answer from the community was, "That's a neat idea, someone should give it a go."

If your state isn’t on this list, it begs the question... why?

The 2020 election exposed a wide range of questionable practices, much of which Glenn covered in a recent TV special. A particularly sinister practice is the use of private money to fund the election. This money came from a slew of partisan private sources, including Mark Zuckerberg, entailed a host of caveats and conditions and were targeted at big city election offices— predominantly democratic areas. The intention is clear: this private money was being used to target Democrat voters and to facilitate their election process over their Republican counterparts.

The use of private funds poses a major flaw in the integrity of our election, one which many states recognized and corrected after the 2020 election. This begs the question: why haven't all states banned private funding in elections? Why do they need private funding? Why don't they care about the strings attached?

Below is the list of all 28 states that have banned private funding in elections. If you don't see your state on this list, it's time to call your state's election board and demand reform.


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images

North Carolina

Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images

North Dakota

Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images

South Carolina

Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images

South Dakota

Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Photo 12 / Contributor | Getty Images

West Virginia

Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images


Encyclopaedia Britannica / Contributor | Getty Images

POLL: Was Malaysia Flight 370 taken by a WORMHOLE?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

It's hard to know what's real and what's fake anymore.

With the insanity that seems to grow every day, it is becoming more and more difficult to tell what's true and what's not, what to believe, and what to reject. Anything seems possible.

That's why Glenn had Ashton Forbes on his show, to explore the fringe what most people would consider impossible. Forbes brought Glenn a fascinating but far-out theory that explains the decade-old disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 along with riveting footage that supposedly corroborates his story. Like something out of a sci-fi novel, Forbes made the startling claim that Flight 370 was TELEPORTED via a U.S. military-made wormhole! As crazy as that sounds, the video footage along with Forbes' scientific research made an interesting, if not compelling case.

But what do you think? Do you believe that the U.S. Government can create wormholes? Did they use one to abduct Flight 370? Is the government hiding futuristic tech from the rest of the world? Let us know in the poll below:

Does the military have the capability to create wormholes?

Is the U.S. military somehow responsible for what happened to Malaysia Flight 370?

Is the military in possession of technology beyond what we believe to be possible?

Do you think American military tech is ahead of the other superpowers?

Do you think there would be negative consequences if secret government technology was leaked?