BLOG

Can Cold Medication Cause a Secret Service Interrogation? (Yes, Yes It Can)

Unexpected reactions to medication happen all the time. Just ask Tiger Woods --- and radio host Doc Thompson, who filled in for Glenn Wednesday on radio. In Doc's case, his reaction took place behind a microphone, not the wheel of a car.

Years ago, Doc was doing an afternoon show in Virginia. He was new on the job and hadn't racked up a lot of vacation time. So when a really bad cold hit, he loaded up on antibiotics and OTC sinus meds.

"I'm just struggling, struggling. I have no energy," Doc explained. "So I drink a cup of coffee. And I'm like, okay, just focus, man, focus."

What really perked him up was President George W. Bush.

"I was really ticked off at something that George W. Bush had done. Imagine that," Doc said.

Once off the air, he realized he might have said something untoward --- although he couldn't remember at the time. He did remember the next day, however, when the Secret Service showed up to interrogate him. It seems Doc may have off-handedly said something about shooting the president.

Thank goodness he survived the interrogation. Someone as spongy and soft as Doc would have never survived cell block two. Even Kathy Griffin knows that.

Enjoy this complimentary clip or read the transcript for details.

DOC:  I was visited once by the Secret Service as well.  I think Glenn has told his story about them showing up here.  I recognize that they have to at this point investigate all threats.  But what is a threat?  Would you see this Kathy Griffin one as a threat?

KRIS:  Oh, no.  I wouldn't.  I would be a really bad Secret Service agent.  I'd be like, come on, guys, it's an attempt at art.  Not funny.  Inappropriate.

KRIS:  It's an attempt at comedy.  I see it more as comedy.  She calls herself a comedian.  I see it as an attempt at comedy, then art.

DOC:  Okay.

BRAD:  It's just a bad decision all the way around.

DOC:  There's that as well.  So years ago I was working in Richmond, Virginia, doing afternoons at WRVA.  And love Richmond, loved being there.  It was awesome.  But I had only been working there about three or four months doing the afternoon program.  And that would have been at the end of the George W. Bush administration.  So this would have been the fall of 2017.  We were -- or, excuse me.  2007.  Yeah, fall of 2007.  2008 was, of course, the election in November.

So just started there a couple months or so on the air.  And I got a really bad cold.  And I didn't have any vacation time.  I didn't have any days I could use at this point.  So I go to the doctor.  And I'm loaded up on medication.  It's a real struggle.  I can barely speak.  My head -- just can't put the words together.  Kind of like now.

And I'm just struggling, struggling.  I have no energy.  So I'm on antibiotics and a couple of different -- like looseners and sinuses.  And things to get it -- it was horrible.  So I'm just trying to get energy.  So I drink a cup of coffee.  And I'm like, okay.  Just focus, man.  Focus.  And I'm just starting to get a little steam going.  What got me going, I was really ticked off at something that George W. Bush had done.  Imagine that.

KRIS:  Which is normal for you.

DOC:  Which is normal, because he grew government almost as much as Obama did.  And I'm really getting heated.  And it's finally clicking.  And my thoughts are clearer.  I'm concentrating.  And then I go into my commercial break.  And then it was like, did I kind of say something wrong there?  This is how foggy my head was.  Was there something inappropriate?  I said to my producer.  Clifford.  I said, hey, did I say something edgy or wrong?  He said no.  He listens about as much as Kal.  Our producer on the morning Blaze.  And I said, okay.  Well, great.  Either he didn't hear it or he didn't think it was wrong.  The next day, about an hour before I go on the air, the boss comes walking by, he goes, hey, got a minute?  I said, yeah.  He said, good.  Walk up front.  Secret Service is here.

(laughter)

I was like, what?  Secret Service?  They're like, yeah, we got reports.  You said something on the air.  Or whatever.  And I'm like, what the heck did I say?  So I'm like, was that yesterday?  We go back and get the tape.  In my fogginess, being really ticked off, I said the guy ought to be shot.  But, you know, how you're like, somebody ought to slap that --

KRIS:  Why couldn't you say that?

DOC:  Why do you mean why did I say it?  It was a mistake.  I screwed up.  And also I'm an idiot.

No, I know you can't say it.  But it's like one of those things you just say off the cuff.  And, again, I wouldn't have said, knowing you're on the air and talking about the president or whatever.  But it was this fogginess.

So the Secret Service agent goes, all right.  Well, we have to investigate it.  And I'm like, all right.  I'm watching the clock.  And it's like, okay.  Forty-five minutes I'm on the hour.  Half-hour I'm on the hair.  We're waiting.  Listen to the tape.  He's like, all right.  Well, it doesn't seem -- it doesn't seem all that egregious.  We think we know where you're coming from on there.  I was like, okay.  Twenty minutes before I go on the air.  He's like, all right -- normally, there's -- and I don't know if he was joking or threw out a random number.  He goes, normally, there's 53 questions we have to ask you.  Or -- it was like --

BRAD:  Not 51.  Not 54.

DOC:  Right.  It was around 50.  But it was not an even number.  It was like 47, 53, 61.  It was something like this.  And I was like, okay.  I've got 15 minutes left.  He goes, but it doesn't seem that bad.  So we'll just make this quick and do the short version.  Two questions.

Okay.  I hope there's not a slide rule.  I was told there would be no math.

He goes, number one, first of all, let me just -- first of all, hang on a second.  This is Jeffy on the show.  First of all, see, I find it difficult to bite my tongue quite often.

KRIS:  Yeah, you're a jerk.

DOC:  I'm a jerk.  It's like, who framed Roger rabbit?  Shave and a hair cut.  I cannot go to the punch line if you're setting me up.  So he goes, what would you do if George W. Bush walked into the room right now?  Oh.  So many answers about the TSA.  So many responses about creating a whole new department of government and supporting illegal immigration and overspending like crazy.  So many failed -- and I was like, "Shave and a hair cut -- I'd probably ask to interview him."  He's like.  All right.  Good answer.  Second question:  Do you harbor any ill will against the president?  Oh.

Do you mean about the way he screwed up -- just started going off in my head.  And I'm going, don't go to prison today, Doc.  Don't go to prison.  This is a bad career move.  Even Kathy Griffin knows this.  Bad career move.  You're soft and spongy.  You won't do well in cell block two.  Not good.

So I go, no, I don't.  Secretly, I really did harbor professional ill will toward him, just not personal ill will.  But I don't think they would have gotten that nuanced answer.

BRAD:  So you lied to the Secret Service?

DOC:  Basically, yeah.  I didn't clarify, yes.  No professional or personal ill, just professional.  I didn't want him to be president anymore because he did a poor job.  He wasn't conservative or Libertarian.  So he goes, all right.  Fine.

And then on the way out, the other guy -- agent was like, really sorry we had to do this or whatever.  By the way, we got to keep this tape. I was like, okay.

KRIS:  So you have a file?

DOC:  Right.  But for threatening Bush, not Obama.

KRIS:  So that's good.  You have a cover.

DOC:  Can you imagine if I had been the one in Obama --

KRIS:  I don't think we'd be talking to you right now.

DOC:  And that's my plausibility about hating for Obama for eight years.  It wasn't him that I threatened to kill.

KRIS:  Right.  Oh, so you get a pass?

DOC:  It was Bush, according to some people.

BRAD:  You didn't even threaten to kill him.  You said somebody else should shoot him.

DOC:  Right.  But here's the thing about it, somebody heard that in the audience and said, I've got to call this one in.  You know that's a rant and an off-the-cuff remark.  Did that person really think I was advocating this?

BRAD:  Was your ex-wife in the listening audience?

DOC:  No, I don't think she was.  Yeah, I got him now.  I got him right now.  I got him right here on tape.

I think it was more likely -- remember, conservative radio station.  Right?  With probably primarily Republican listeners and me being honest about George W. Bush.  They probably didn't take kindly to that.

KRIS:  You ticked them off?

DOC:  I think that's probably what happened.  How dare you say something like that.  Because I like this guy, not holding him accountable for all of his failures.  Remember, it wasn't until way late in his second term that people started wising up and speaking the truth.  I mean, Glenn had for most of the run.  He was -- he gave him his due back and forth.  I did and always felt kind of, you know, off from a lot of the conservative talk show hosts.  Because they just carried water for him.  A lot of them, just, oh, defend.  Defend.  Defend.  And we're not willing to say what he did wrong.  So it was like that last year and half where people started -- wait a minute.  Yeah, where were you?  I was a year and a half in saying, wait a minute.  We're spending what?  We're doing what?  This is a problem.  I mean, I knew by his reelection that there was something really, really wrong with this scenario.  But most people couldn't do it.  And that's what brought about the Tea Party.  It was the TARP program.  Remember, when they came out and said, we got to spend a trillion dollars.  And we can't tell you why.  We just hope it works.

What are you going to spend?  We don't know.  It's just got to be a really big number.  So it could have been 800 billion?  It's got to be a big number.  What?

KRIS:  The bigger, the better?  Oh, yeah.

DOC:  And what's going to happen?  Global meltdown.  How do you know?  We don't.  We just know if we spend this money if it won't melt down.  What are you talking about?  Right.  And that's when the Tea Party stepped up and certain people saying, we've got to get some Tea Party group in response to this, even though they primarily said it was anti-Obama.  He just got more and more people involved in it.  But that was the George W. Bush saying I'm a free market guy.  I love free market.  But we have to do this.

That was basically his quote.

BRAD:  The last four years, it was basically a victory lap.

DOC:  Right.  Exactly.  So, yeah, that was not an easy day for me with that one.  So then, by the way, I have to go on and do a show.  I mean --

KRIS:  How did that go?

DOC:  It was rough.  Here's the thing, when you're on the air, you got to bring it.  You've got to have a certain swagger and be bigger than life with this stuff.  Well, I just almost got arrested by the Secret Service minutes before.  I had no swagger.  The swagger, completely gone.

KRIS:  They took it away?  So they took your manhood?

DOC:  They did.  I had nothing.

BRAD:  It was deflated.

DOC:  There was no hubris.  No mojo.  It was gone.

KRIS:  They took your covfefe.

DOC:  They did.  I was Covfefe less.  I was covfefeless that day.

So I get to the first break.  And the producers said to me -- and I wear this as a little badge of honor.  He goes, I got to tell you, your two predecessors in this time slot, they would have gone home.  They would have been home drinking.  And I said, I don't know how it went.  I said, you know, some day I'll laugh about this.  Today is that day.

KRIS:  Yes.  Today is the day.

DOC:  Today is that day.  By the way, Brad can you look up statute of limitations?

RADIO

Glenn joins Megyn Kelly live to discuss Charlie Kirk shooting

Covering the breaking news of Charlie Kirk at shot at Turning Point USA event.

RADIO

Please pray for my friend Charlie.

Please pray for Charlie Kirk.

Please pray for our Republic.

RADIO

Exclusive new poll reveals why Gen Z wants to BURN the system down

A shocking number of young Americans support BOTH President Trump and democratic socialism, a new poll has found, and they're willing to make major changes to the American system to get what they feel they deserve. Justin Haskins, who conducted the poll with Rasmussen, joins Glenn Beck to break down the unexpected findings…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins. He's the president of our republic. StoppingSocialism.com. He's editor-in-chief. And also the coauthor of several books, with me. Welcome to the program, Justin.

How are you?

JUSTIN: I'm doing well, Glenn. How are you?

STU: Well, I was well, until you contacted me on vacation, and sent me this disturbing poll.

I am in bed at night.

And I'm reading this. I'm like, oh, dear.

What? My wife is like, I told you to not check this email. I'm like, I didn't know Justin was going to write to me.

Justin, tell me, first of all, before we get into it, how secure is the sample size on this poll?

JUSTIN: It's a very good sample size. 1200 people nationally.

Only 18 to 39-year-olds. And we did that deliberately, so that we could get a sample size large enough so we could pull out valid responses, just from younger people.

So the whole purpose of this poll was to find out what younger people, 18 to 39 think, voters only. And people who say that they're likely to vote. So we're not talking about just people out in the public. We're not talking about registered voters.

We're talking about people who are registered to vote. And say they're likely to vote.

GLENN: So let's go over some of the things that you have already released to the press.

And that is, in the survey, 18 to 39-year-olds, likely voters.

The Trump approval rating is a lot higher than you thought it would be. Right?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. Forty-eight percent positive approval rating of Donald Trump, which for young people, is very high.

So that's -- that's the good news.

That's the only good news we're going to talk about.

GLENN: We might have to come back to that first question several times.

Do you believe the United States is a fundamentally good, evil, or morally mixed country?

JUSTIN: Yep. This one is not too bad.

It's not great. But fundamentally good was 28 percent.

Which is low. But mixed was 50 percent.

And fundamentally evil was 17 percent.

And I think mixed at 50 percent is not an unreasonable, crazy response.

I -- I can see why all sorts of people might choose that.

So I don't think there's anything terrible here. It depends on what you mean by mixed. Fundamentally good at 28 percent. It's a little low. Fundamentally evil at 17 percent, it's a little disturbing. But it's not -- it's not insane. The insane stuff comes a little bit later.

GLENN: Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Major industries talk about the crazy stuff coming later, here it is.

Major industries like health care, energy, and big tech should be nationalized and give more control and equity to the people.

JUSTIN: Yeah. This was -- this was -- this one floored me. If I look at strongly agree. Somewhat agree for that statement you just read. It's over 70 percent of young people, including -- including the vast majority of Republicans. Young Republicans. And people who identify as conservatives.

It was pretty similar, in fact, how young people responded compared to liberals and independents.

And Democrats.

They all pretty much agreed that, yes. The government. The federal government should be nationalizing whole industries to make things more equitable for people.

GLENN: As the guy who is the chief -- editor-in-chief of stopping socialism. What's the problem with nationalizing energy, and health care?

JUSTIN: Well --

GLENN: What happens, typically.

JUSTIN: Well, usually, there's blood in the streets, when you do too much of that.

You know, socialism, communism have been spectacularly horrible, throughout the course of human history. Across every society, culture, religion.

It doesn't matter when or what kind of technological advancements you have. The more you collect vies a society. The more authoritarian that society gets. The less you have individual freedom. And the worst the economy usually is for regular people. So it's been a catastrophe across-the-board. Everyone listening to this audience, probably knows that.

And so the idea that you would have three-quarters of young voters. So remember, these people will be the primary voters in ten to 20 years.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: Saying, yeah. We should be nationalizing whole industries. Whole industries, is so disturbing.

And I don't think that conservatives are -- understand how deeply rooted some of these ideas are with younger people.

GLENN: No. No.

And I will tell you, I think some conservatives are walking a very dangerous line. And, you know, coming up with a little mix of everything.

And -- and I think we have to be very careful on -- on what is being said. And who are WHO our friends and allies are.

By the way, that number again is 39 percent strongly agree.

37 percent somewhat agree.

Somewhat disagree, 12 percent. Strongly disagree, 5 percent.

That is disastrous. Now, try this one on. These are the ones that have been -- we have new ones.

These are just a few of the ones that were released late last week. The next presidential election is in 2028. Would you like to see a democratic socialist candidate win the 2028 presidential election?

JUSTIN: Yep, 53 percent said yes.

Fifty-three percent of all voters said yes. And the most shocking thing, was that 35 percent of those who we poll, who said they voted for Donald Trump, in 2024, said that that they want to see a socialist win in 2028. And so about a third of Republicans, 35 percent of Trump voters, 43 percent of people who call themselves conservatives, so even on the right, among younger people. There is a large group that want a socialist president, in 2028.

GLENN: And the reason -- the reason is, it -- it tied into the next few questions. Okay.

So here's question five. Among the following options, which best describes your biggest reason, you would like to see a democratic socialist candidate. Thirty-one percent said housing costs are too high. Twelve percent, taxes are too low for corporations. Eleven percent, taxes are too low for wealthy have I seen.

Eight percent want single payer health care systems. Seventeen say the economy unfairly benefits older, wealthier Americans.

Fifteen percent say the economy unfairly benefits larger corporations. 5 percent, some other reason.

And 2 percent, unsure. Now, let's get into the new polls that were breaking today.

Question six.

How would you describe your current financial situation?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Only 24 percent said that they're doing well. Thirty-four -- 38 percent said getting by. Struggling 29 percent. Seven percent said in crisis. So if you add up just getting by, struggling, and in crisis, that's 74 percent said that they're just barely getting by, at best.

And I think that explains a lot of the other negative responses we've seen so far.

GLENN: That's not good.

JUSTIN: In this poll. And the ones that are going to come pretty soon here.

GLENN: Seven. Which best describes your personal life situation?

You are thriving, you're doing well with a few ups and downs. You feel stuck and uncertain. You feel lonely, disconnected, or emotionally drained. You're in a crisis and feel most negative about your personal life.

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. About a third said that they feel stuck or uncertain. Lonely. Or that they're in a crisis.

That's a third of young people. Say that.

I mean, that's -- that's not great. Only 19 percent said thriving.

46 percent said, they have ups and downs. Which I think is not. Too shocking.

But the idea that there's a third of American voters out there, who feel like, they can't buy a home. And they feel like they are lonely. And that they're in crisis. And that life is not just going well at all for them.

Again, I think that's -- that's driving a lot of the support for socialism. When you have 53 percent of these people saying, yeah. I want a socialist president in 2028.

GLENN: So socialism is not the answer. It is the symptom. It is the symptom of what people are feeling right now.

And they -- they don't know any other -- they don't -- nobody is presenting them with anything other than, you know, Republican/Democrat bullcrap. And socialists are coming at it from a completely nigh angle. Or so the youth think it's the oldest and most failed system of all time.

But they're seeing this as a solution that is different than what the party -- the Republican/Democrats are offering. Even though the Democrats are offering the socialism thing.

Number eight, do you think the American economy is unfair to young people?

Sixty-two percent say yes.

JUSTIN: Yeah, and 27 percent said no.
And I think that this really gets at the heart of what the issue is here.

When you look at the reasons. When you look at the detailed things of the poll.

What -- to try to find out if there's an association between some kind of demographic or response question about people's lives and their support for socialism, to see if there's a correlation there between something that is happening. And whether someone is a socialist or not.

One of the top correlations, connections, is, if people think the economy is unfair.

And if they're having trouble buying a home. Or they don't think they can buy a home. Or that's one of their reasons for supporting socialism.

So, in other words, there's this fairness issue. And it's not even about inequality.

It's not about, well, they have too much -- well, if they feel like the -- to use a Trump term. Rigged.

And throughout the data. That's what we see over and over and over again. Is lots of people say, the economy is rigged. For older people. For wealthier people, for corporations. It's rigged. And if they say, yeah. I think it's rigged, you know, then they're more likely to say, yeah. I want a socialist.

And I also think the same group has a relatively high approval rating of Donald Trump.

It's because the reason that a lot of young people like Trump in the poll, is that he's not part of the establishment.

And I think -- I don't think they -- I think a lot of young people who voted for Trump and who liked Trump, they didn't do it, because they liked free market, pro-liberty policies. And that's not a good thing.

But I don't think that's why they did it. I think a lot of them voted for Trump and supported him, because he's not the establishment. And that's what they don't like. They want to blow the establishment up.

JUSTIN: So my -- Justin, my sample size is my two young adults. My two children.

And they're like, talking to me, and saying, Dad. I will never be able to own a home, looking at the prices, looking at interest rates. They're like, I can't even afford to pay rent at an apartment. And they don't know what to do.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JASON: And so they're looking at -- on, like, TikTok. And they're like, who is this Mamdani guy? This sounds interesting. They bring this to me. They grew up listening to me indoctrinating them their entire lives. They're looking at other voices like on TikTok. Are we just not being loud enough?

GLENN: No. We're not -- we're not connecting with them. We're not -- I feel like they don't feel they're being heard.

And we are speaking to them in red, white and be blue.

And that means nothing. The Statue of Liberty means nothing to them. Ellis Island means nothing to them. The flag means nothing to them.

It's all partisan politics.

They're all symbols of really, the two parties.

You know, and an America, they don't relate to at all.

I think that's -- that's our biggest problem, and not being able to break through. To your point, question nine. How confident are you that you will own a home at some point, in the next ten years?

29 percent say, they already own a home. Which I found interesting. That's -- I think a pretty high number for somebody who is 18 to 34 years old.

JUSTIN: Thirty-nine.

GLENN: Thirty-nine.

JUSTIN: Yeah.

GLENN: There's a lot of 18 to 30. That I didn't own home when I was, you know, 30. Just got a home when I was 30. But go ahead. Go ahead with the rest of that poll.

JUSTIN: Yeah. So then 21 percent said discouraged, but somewhat hopeful. 12 percent said, not confident. 10 percent said, you are convinced you will never own a home. 3 percent not sure.

So if you add up the negative responses, it's around 43 percent that gave that response.

GLENN: Right. But, again, 29 percent, you already own a home. And 25 percent you are confident you will own a home, is still good. It just -- these -- these other numbers, have, you know, discouraged, but hopefully you will own a home. Who is discouraging that? And how is that being discouraged?

You know, only 12 -- let's see 12. Twenty-two. 25 percent are not sure they will ever own a home. That's too high of a number.

But I -- I don't think that's completely dismal. Now, a completely dismal answer, to the question, would you support a law that would confiscate America's excess wealth?

Including things like second homes. Luxury cars, and private boats, in order to help young people buy a home for the first time?

Are you for or against that? We'll give you that number here in just a second.

GLENN: There are some disturbing results, that get very disturbing, going from here on.

We've got two of these today, and then more tomorrow.

We'll spend more time with you tomorrow, Justin.

But would you support a law that would confiscate American's excess wealth, including things like second home, luxury cars, and private boats in order to help young people buy a home for the first time? Get the results.

JUSTIN: Yeah, 25 percent strongly support that, 30 percent somewhat support it, 55 percent in total for support. Only 38 percent strongly or somewhat oppose, with just 20 percent saying strongly oppose. So the vast majority now is -- is supporting this Communistic policy to confiscate people's wealth in order to help people. Younger people buy homes, which is in line with that question, we talked about earlier. Where it said, you know, three-quarters of these respondents wanted to nationalize whole industries to make things fairer. So it's all about -- it's all about this sense of unfairness that exists.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: And they feel like. Young people feel like the system is rigged. They feel like neither party is on their side, and they want to blow the whole thing up, by just taking wealth away from people, nationalizing whole industries, and redistributing it all.

And guess what, that's basically the democratic socialist platform. So it's not a surprise that that's -- that's becoming increasingly more popular with these young people.

And I don't think that free market, pro-liberty people are dealing with -- with this.

GLENN: No.

JUSTIN: In a real way.

In fact, I think a lot of us have believed recently that the wind is at our backs, and we're actually winning more and more young people over.
And that isn't what's happening according to the poll results.

GLENN: It explains why the Democrats have not moved their position off of the socialism stuff.

Doesn't it?

We keep saying, why? It's not working with anybody.

It is working. It is working with people under 39.

18 to 39-year-olds are hearing this message, and are embracing this message.

RADIO

Mamdani & AOC are correct: This system is RIGGED

The socialists like AOC and Zohran Mamdani are right about one thing, Glenn Beck says: the system we’re living under right now IS RIGGED. But it’s not capitalism. Glenn explains what this system really is and gives a much better solution than trying yet another communist revolution.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: When you talk about capitalism, that just falls on deaf ears. Because people think we have capitalism now. We haven't had capitalism in over 100 years, okay?

The word free market. Those words.
That's like wallpaper now. Just background noise, and a political speech. And nobody pays attention to it. But what we are living under and have lived under is not the free market. It's a cartel. It really is.

The government has turned into a cartel with crony deals and lobbyists that are writing the rules and bailouts for the powerful. You know, people -- people on the left keep saying, the rich keep getting richer. Well, yes. And -- and who are the rich? Who are the rich? Who are the rich? Let's just start at the top. How about the banks?

What do the banks do? The banks have a cartel. It's called the Federal Reserve.

Who controls the Federal Reserve? Do you control the Federal Reserve.

That's the five biggest banks in the country. The five biggest banks in the country. We don't even know who they are. What kind of system is that? That is a progressive system, put in by Woodrow Wilson and his cronies at the time to control you. That's what all of this is about. Controlling you! Getting rich themselves, and controlling you.

And they do it through these official sounding things like the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve is not the free market. And should be destroyed! We haven't had the free market for a very long time. Who is bailing these corporations out? It's the government.

Why is the government doing that? Because the corporations are taking money, and they're allowed to buy lobbyists. So they can -- most of the laws are not written by any lawmaker.

They're written by lobbyists. And then they're pushed through, by the lobbyists, into Congress, all the way up to the president.

That's not a free system.

That is a -- that is a system where you get screwed in the end. Okay?

The government is -- it's a machine that has been used by the powerful corporations, and the powerful people like George Soros.

To keep you down and to lift them up. Protect them.

Because they think they know better than you. They're more important than you.

And if you were -- if you're 30 years old. This is all you've ever seen. You've seen the rotten fruit of that tree for a very, very long time.

The crushing rent. The suffocating debt. That you probably saw your parents go through, while the banks were being bailed out.

The health care bills that you can't understand anymore.

How does that even work?

Not only can you not understand your health care bill, how are you going to pay your health care bill?

But here's the secret: None of this is the free market.

None of it.

You've not seen the free market. Not once!

What you've seen and witnessed here in America is a rigged game. And people are right to reject it.

You're right! But that's not what the system was designed to do. That is the bastardization of this. It's taken them 100 years to do it.

But that's what this system has been turned into. Here's the twist.

If you let the real free market breathe, it doesn't chain you down. It lifts you up.

What -- what if we instead of burning the whole system down, what if we burn down the barricades. The barricades of red tape. And let builders actually build.

What if zoning laws and rent controls were cleared out like brush wood. Suddenly, the housing market would be affordable again.

And if you don't believe me, look at what's happening in Argentina.

And not in theory, in practice!

Actually doing these things, and making things affordable again. What if health care bills showed the price up front?

Okay. Like a restaurant menu.

Doctors were competing to earn your business, instead of serving the insurance companies.

The insurance companies, also have gone completely mad and corrupt. And how did they do it. Why did they do it. They did it because it's the rules the government set up.

Because it was dirty. If you think awe bigger government is going on to make things better, you're wrong.

The government is the problem. What if student loans stopped being a -- a government racket?
Do you know -- do you know the price of education back in the '60s and '70s. It wasn't the price of a house.

What happened? That got out of control when the government started saying, you know what, we're going to -- we're going to get into the business of loans.

We're going to give the loans.

Once those loans were guaranteed, the universities knew, well, we're in bed with the government now.

It will never fail.

They'll never -- they'll never stop writing those loans.

And we can charge whatever we want.

But what if the loans stopped being this government racket and education was tailored and affordable and actually useful!

Not this crap you're getting now. You're being trained to be a revolutionary. That's it!

They're not training you for any usable skill. They are so far behind the curve on what is coming, by the time you racked up all this debt, you're sitting there under this mountain of debt, you think you've played by the rules, and so you're feeling like, hey, I'm getting screwed by everybody else.

You're not getting screwed by everybody else. You were screwed by the universities in bed with the government and the teachers unions. That's who you've been screwed by. Make no mistake.

And what do the teachers unions and the schools and the government now trying to get you to do?

To be a revolutionary.

To make the government even bigger and more powerful!


What if we made things actually work.

I mean, not just a slogan. But a real idea of cutting all of this.

Milei is doing it in Argentina right now. He's stripping rent control, and it has caused the supply of houses to triple and prices to fall!

Why is nobody talking about that?

Why is that not -- why is that not in anybody's best interest to talk about that?

Why is that not on the front page of everything? That's an actual solution. The houses. The market has tripled in size! The availability of housing is triple what it was! And the prices are lower. Why aren't we looking at that?

Because it's not in anyone's interest except for yours. And nobody is serving you.

And you are become a useful idiot, by playing into this system. By saying, yeah. We need more government regulation.

This is not about left or right.

It's not about the Democrats or the Republicans. Because all of that is garbage.

This is about finally, for the first time in your lifetime. In my lifetime, trying to do what America was actually built to do in the first place.

Freedom in the marketplace.
The free market is not an old idea.

Okay?

It's the newest idea that America hasn't dared tried in decades.

Why is everybody pushing failed systems that have failed over and over and over again. And yet, we have the one system. The free market. The true free market that completely changed the entire world. Fed more people.

Brought more people out of poverty.

Changed health care system entirely.

Gave us -- gave us energy and -- and fuel to be able to read at night. Study at night. Fly across the world.

Do all of these amazing things.

Gave us the internet.

Well, why -- why -- why aren't we going back and saying, wait a minute. What was it? That started that revolution?

Why? Let's try that again. Instead of going back to something that ended in 100 million people being killed.

Starved to death!

Oppressed. People thrown in prison.

My gosh.

We are -- we are dragging anchors through history, old language. Old solutions. Old slogans. Democrats. Republicans. They argue over the size of government, as if that debate hasn't become the deadweight that keeps this nation down in the first place.

Meanwhile, you, a young person in Dallas that's just starting a family. A single mom in Chicago, the contractor in Idaho.

You're not debating theory.

This is real life for you.

You're drown in the price of rent and groceries and gasoline.

You're watching your dream shrink and shrink and shrink while politicians just keep using recycled words that meant something 40 years ago, that don't mean anything anymore.

Don't burn the system down.

Cut the ropes that have been tying you down!

It's time to throw the deadweight overboard. So what does that look like?

It looks like putting you the consumer, not the government, not the corporation, back at the center.

Ever notice, recently, corporations really don't care about you. They say they care about you in theory. They care about people in blocks. But they don't serve you. Has your service, at your local store or whatever, gotten better or worse?

Do they care more about serving you? That's the idea of the free market. You want to know how to get rich? You get rich by coming up with a way to serve people and make their life easier and better every day.

If I can help you understand the world in a better way, so it makes -- so the world makes sense to you. I've given you something of value, that you want.

That's how I make my money.

Because I work every day, trying to figure out, how can I make your life more manageable

You have to do. That's what all entrepreneurs have to do. How can I help people ease their life?

Provide them with something that makes their life better. Instead, the other way to do it is how can I oppress people.

How can I make sure the government will guard everything I'm doing. Even though I'm ripping people off.

I'm destroying lives. But I'll get rich. And the government will get rich.

No.

We need energy prices that fall. Because of competition. Not subsidies. And the government not deciding winners. But you deciding the winner. We -- we need housing unlocked bit simple idea that builders should be allowed to build. Wages that rise because the little guy is suddenly allowed to compete with the big guy! Not beg the big guy for a job.

We have to stop defending capitalism, because capitalism as it has been, it's over. It doesn't work.

We need to unleash freedom, as it was meant to be.

Not the freedom of slogans. Not the freedom of insider deals.

But the real freedom of choice and risk and reward, applied to everyone in everyday life, all around the country.

Because the -- honestly, history will tell us, when countries fall into despair, they reach control.

Every time. Every time, and it's going to happen here.

The central plan. The state solution.

Strong man. America was built on the opposite impulse. To trust people more than the planners.

That was our radical idea!

That was the miracle!

Trust people over the planners!

The question is: I mean, that's the one idea, we haven't tried in a very long time.

Can we make it new again?

And can we convince people to believe in themselves! Instead of the people who have brought us this misery.