20 Delusional Conspiracy Theories Floated by Alex Jones

Is Megyn Kelly legitimizing Alex Jones by giving him air time during an interview? That's what many are saying, including the family members of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting victims. The truth, though, is that he's already been legitimized.

"The president of the United States has legitimized Alex Jones. Roger Stone, by being a fill-in host for Alex Jones, has legitimized Alex Jones. Donald Trump, Jr., who has been on his show several times, has legitimized Alex Jones. Alex Jones is not this fringe character. The New York Magazine, New York Times, The New Yorker, they have also done profiles of Alex Jones," Glenn said.

Megyn Kelly is not doing a puff piece on Jones. As her released promo shows, she's holding his feet to the fire and exposing him to the American people.

RELATED: WATCH: Megyn Kelly Promo Shows She Won’t Be Giving Alex Jones a Free Pass

What will Kelly expose? Alex Jones' delusional conspiracy theories which --- whether real or pretend --- have harmed the media, companies and, most importantly, the victims of horrible crimes.

Here are twenty of this most outrageous claims:

1. Sandy Hook Hoax

The Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting was completely fake and manufactured with actors. "They have staged events before. But then you learn the school had been closed and reopened. And you got video of the kids going in circles, in and out of the building, and they don't call the rescue choppers for two hours. And then they tear the building down and seal it. And they get caught using blue screens. And an email by Bloomberg comes out in the lawsuit, where he's telling his people, get ready in the next 24 hours to capitalize on a shooting. Yeah, so Sandy Hook is a synthetic, completely fake, with actors, in my view, manufactured. I couldn't believe it at first. I knew they had actors there, clearly, but I thought they killed some real kids. And it just shows how bold they are, that they clearly used actors. I mean, they even ended up using photos of kids killed in mass shootings here in a fake mass shooting in Turkey."

2. Animal-Human Hybrids

The government is breeding animals and humans together.

3. Aurora Mass Shooting

There's a "100 percent chance that the mass murder committed in Aurora, Colorado, was a false flag, a mind control event."

4. Columbine High School Shooting

The 1999 school shooting was an "extremely suspicious event that had globalist operations written all over it. Columbine, as we know it, was a false flag. I'd say 100 percent false flag."

5. Tucson Shooting

"The whole thing stinks to high heaven."

6. San Bernardino Shooting

A false flag because governments want to "blame the Second Amendment."

7. Orlando Pulse Nightclub Shooting

A "false flag to take your guns and speech."

8: Boston Marathon Bombing

This thing "stinks to high heaven, #falseflag."

9. Obama Married a Man

Obama married a man, Michelle Obama, "because he's obsessed with transgender rights."

10. Vaccines

If you take vaccines, "you'll become disabled or you will die."

RELATED: Megyn Kelly Wants to EXPOSE Alex Jones, Not Legitimize Him

11. Weather Control

The government has "a weather weapon that can create and steer natural disasters."

12. Las Vegas Police Shooting

It was "absolutely staged by the government."

13. Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster

Globalists caused the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster to serve as "a distraction from Iraq."

14. 9/11

9/11 was an inside job. Popular Mechanics debunked it, but only because they are part of the CIA.

15. Bilderberg

Bilderberg people go to the Bohemian Grove "to eat gold-wrapped, roasted babies." He offered a police officer $10,000 to disprove it.

16. Comet Ping Pong

Comet Ping Pong pizza "has a labyrinth of tunnels where children are used as sex slaves." He had to apologize for that.

17. Chobani Yogurt

Chobani Yogurt is importing rapists. He had to pay a settlement for that one.

18. Fluoride Poison

Fluoride is poison and it's killing us all.

19. Oklahoma City Bombing

Oklahoma City Bombing was "an inside job and a total false flag."

20. Fetus-Flavored Pepsi

Pepsi has tested new flavorings of fetuses. "I know that there are fetal tissues in a lot of the medical treatments in the vaccines, and they are in a lot of the cosmetics. That's confirmed. We know Pepsi is involved with companies that do use the fetal parts, and we do know that it's been tested in flavor enhancement."

"How can you you do an interview with this guy and normalize him?" Glenn asked. "You're not normalizing him, you're exposing him."

Listen to this segment from The Glenn Beck Program:

GLENN: Megyn Kelly is getting hit for this piece that she has done with Alex Jones. Now, what's happening? Well, the families of Sandy Hook are complaining that you're legitimizing Alex Jones. No, the president of the United States has legitimized Alex Jones. Roger Stone, by being a fill-in host for Alex Jones, has legitimized Alex Jones. Donald Trump Jr, who has been on his show several times, has legitimized Alex Jones. Alex Jones is not this fringe character. The New York Magazine, New York Times, the New Yorker, they have also done profiles of Alex Jones.

PAT: And nobody wanted to shut them down for it.

GLENN: Nobody wants to shut them down. But NBC and Megyn Kelly -- Megyn does an interview, where we play the audio. It comes up on Sunday. We played the audio yesterday. She's not doing a puff piece. She's not grabbing him by the throat and squeezing. But she is holding his feet to the fire, and she is allowing himself to hang himself with the American people, if that's even possible anymore.

In the interview, he says, "You know what story you're not covering is the animal human hybrid story, where the government is breeding animals and humans together." Okay. Thank you.

He also says in this -- and this is what's causing the controversy, that he has done -- you know, he's played devil's advocate and said that, "No, Sandy Hook victims, they weren't real victims. They were actors." But he says on the show that he was just playing devil's advocate.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Let's play the actual audio of what he said.

ALEX: They have staged events before. But then you learn the school had been closed and reopened. And you got video of the kids going in circles, in and out of the building, and they don't call the rescue choppers for two hours. And then they tear the building down and seal it. And they get caught using blue screens. And an email by Bloomberg comes out in the lawsuit, where he's telling his people, get ready in the next 24 hours to capitalize on a shooting.

Yeah, so Sandy Hook is a synthetic, completely fake, with actors, in my view, manufactured. I couldn't believe it at first. I knew they had actors there, clearly, but I thought they killed some real kids. And it just shows how bold they are, that they clearly used actors. I mean, they even ended up using photos of kids killed in mass shootings here in a fake mass shooting in Turkey.

PAT: Unreal. Let me tell you something, that is not playing devil's advocate. That is not devil's advocate. That is his opinion. And he's pushing that theory forward.

GLENN: If I were a family member --

PAT: Man.

GLENN: And I don't know if you could do this for a public shooting, but I would mad enough that I would be with an attorney saying, "Can we sue him? Can we sue him? My child is dead. My child is dead."

PAT: And you're accusing me of faking it. That my child doesn't exist. Wow.

GLENN: That's absolutely incredible. That's not playing devil's advocate. Let me give you what else he has said. But he's now asking NBC, who is getting heat from both the right and the left and the families, getting heat for running this interview.

Alex Jones --

PAT: He's demanding they not run it.

GLENN: Alex Jones himself is demanding they don't run it.

STU: Which is evidence why you should run it.

GLENN: Why you should run it. He says that they need to cancel it because it's a hit piece. Because he's been taken out of context. Well, there's the context. Right there.

PAT: Yeah. That was in context.

GLENN: That's what he said. Okay.

He's also said, 100 percent chance that the mass murder committed in Aurora, Colorado, was a false flag, a mind control event.

PAT: So it's not just this shooting.

GLENN: Quoting: 1999 Columbine: School shooting was, quote, extremely suspicious event that had globalist operations written all over it. End quote.

Quote, Columbine, as we know it, was a false flag. I'd say 100 percent, false flag. Tucson shooting, quote, the whole thing stinks to high heaven. San Bernardino, shooting a false flag because governments want to, quote, blame the Second Amendment, end quote. Orlando --

PAT: Jeez.

GLENN: -- false flag to take your guns and speech. Boston Marathon, this thing stinks to high heaven, #falseflag, end quote.

PAT: Jeez.

GLENN: He said that Obama had married a man, Michelle Obama, because he's obsessed with transgender rights, end quote.

If you take vaccines, quote, you'll become disabled or you will die, end quote. The government has, quote, a weather weapon that can create and steer natural disasters, end quote. He claimed --

PAT: You're not claiming you don't believe that.

GLENN: He claimed Las Vegas cop shooting was absolutely staged by the government. Quoting: Globalists caused the space shuttle Columbia disaster to serve as, quote, a distraction from Iraq.

And, of course, his all-time classic: 9/11 was an inside job. Popular Mechanics debunked it, but they only debunked it because they are part of the CIA.

He also believes that the Bilderberg people go to the Bohemian Grove, quote, to eat gold-wrapped roasted babies.

PAT: He actually offered a cop $10,000 if he could disprove that.

STU: How would you disprove --

PAT: I don't know. I don't know.

GLENN: Pizza place -- comic pizza --

PAT: They have gold all over their lips after they do it. It's impossible to disprove.

GLENN: What's the name of the place?

STU: Comet Ping Pong.

GLENN: Comet Ping Pong pizza, quote, has a labyrinth of tunnels where children are used as sex slaves. He's had to apologize for that.

The latest is Chobani yogurt is importing rapists. He had to pay a settlement on that. He said fluoride is poison and it's killing us all. That the Oklahoma City bombing was, quote, an inside job and a total false flag. The Gulf of Tonkin is a false flag.

STU: Of course. It all starts there, Pat.

PAT: It does.

GLENN: And my favorite, Pepsi has tested new flavorings of fetuses.

PAT: Well, listen to his case though, you haven't heard his case.

GLENN: All right.

ALEX: I know that there are fetal tissues in a lot of the medical treatments in the vaccines, and they are in a lot of the cosmetics. That's confirmed.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: That's confirmed.

ALEX: We know Pepsi is involved with companies that do use the fetal parts, and we do know that it's been tested in flavor enhancement.

PAT: Because there's nothing more delicious than a fetus. I mean, that's pretty well-known. Right? What is that?

GLENN: No. When you have an aborted baby, you think to yourself, I wonder if we can mix this in a drink to make it taste better. That's what you think.

PAT: If I combine this with some nutmeg, it's going to be delicious.

GLENN: Again, he said in there because they're training us to be cannibals.

Now, how can you you do an interview with this guy and normalize him? How can you do -- when the president has been on his show. The president's son has been on his show.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: The president's advisers have been on his show. You're not normalizing him, you're exposing him.

STU: Of course. We have gone -- this is a country that has -- its journalists go and interview Assad and Ahmadinejad. And Putin.

GLENN: Putin.

STU: She just interviewed Putin.

PAT: They go to prison and interview people on Death Row who have murdered --

GLENN: Charlie Manson.

PAT: Charlie Manson has been interviewed multiple times.

STU: Why on -- I mean, look, Alex Jones I think is terrible for the country. But why on earth can she not --

GLENN: Okay. Because -- I have an answer to this. And it goes to why I am thrilled to have this audience and to be able to talk to you every single day. Because there is something different about this audience. And this audience is growing. This hunger is growing. And I'll tell you what it is, coming up in a second.

Silent genocide exposed: Are christians being wiped out in 2025?

Aldara Zarraoa / Contributor | Getty Images

Is a Christian Genocide unfolding overseas?

Recent reports suggest an alarming escalation in violence against Christians, raising questions about whether these acts constitute genocide under international law. Recently, Glenn hosted former U.S. Army Special Forces Sniper Tim Kennedy, who discussed a predictive model that forecasts a surge in global Christian persecution for the summer of 2025.

From Africa to Asia and the Middle East, extreme actions—some described as genocidal—have intensified over the past year. Over 380 million Christians worldwide face high levels of persecution, a number that continues to climb. With rising international concern, the United Nations and human rights groups are urging protective measures by the global community. Is a Christian genocide being waged in the far corners of the globe? Where are they taking place, and what is being done?

India: Hindu Extremist Violence Escalates

Yawar Nazir / Contributor | Getty Images

In India, attacks on Christians have surged as Hindu extremist groups gain influence within the country. In February 2025, Hindu nationalist leader Aadesh Soni organized a 50,000-person rally in Chhattisgarh, where he called for the rape and murder of all Christians in nearby villages and demanded the execution of Christian leaders to erase Christianity. Other incidents include forced conversions, such as a June 2024 attack in Chhattisgarh, where a Hindu mob gave Christian families a 10-day ultimatum to convert to Hinduism. In December 2024, a Christian man in Uttar Pradesh was attacked, forcibly converted, and paraded while the mob chanted "Death to Jesus."

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) recommends designating India a "Country of Particular Concern" and imposing targeted sanctions on those perpetrating these attacks. The international community is increasingly alarmed by the rising tide of religious violence in India.

Syria: Sectarian Violence Post-Regime Change

LOUAI BESHARA / Contributor | Getty Images

Following the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024, Syria has seen a wave of sectarian violence targeting religious minorities, including Christians, with over 1,000 killed in early 2025. It remains unclear whether Christians are deliberately targeted or caught in broader conflicts, but many fear persecution by the new regime or extremist groups. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a dominant rebel group and known al-Qaeda splinter group now in power, is known for anti-Christian sentiments, heightening fears of increased persecution.

Christians, especially converts from Islam, face severe risks in the unstable post-regime environment. The international community is calling for humanitarian aid and protection for Syria’s vulnerable minority communities.

Democratic Republic of Congo: A "Silent Genocide"

Hugh Kinsella Cunningham / Stringer | Getty Images

In February 2025, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an ISIS-affiliated group, beheaded 70 Christians—men, women, and children—in a Protestant church in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, after tying their hands. This horrific massacre, described as a "silent genocide" reminiscent of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, has shocked the global community.

Since 1996, the ADF and other militias have killed over six million people, with Christians frequently targeted. A Christmas 2024 attack killed 46, further decimating churches in the region. With violence escalating, humanitarian organizations are urging immediate international intervention to address the crisis.

POLL: Starbase exposed: Musk’s vision or corporate takeover?

MIGUEL J. RODRIGUEZ CARRILLO / Contributor | Getty Images

Is Starbase the future of innovation or a step too far?

Elon Musk’s ambitious Starbase project in South Texas is reshaping Boca Chica into a cutting-edge hub for SpaceX’s Starship program, promising thousands of jobs and a leap toward Mars colonization. Supporters see Musk as a visionary, driving economic growth and innovation in a historically underserved region. However, local critics, including Brownsville residents and activists, argue that SpaceX’s presence raises rents, restricts beach access, and threatens environmental harm, with Starbase’s potential incorporation as a city sparking fears of unchecked corporate control. As pro-Musk advocates clash with anti-Musk skeptics, will Starbase unite the community or deepen the divide?

Let us know what you think in the poll below:

Is Starbase’s development a big win for South Texas?  

Should Starbase become its own city?  

Is Elon Musk’s vision more of a benefit than a burden for the region?

Shocking truth behind Trump-Zelenskyy mineral deal unveiled

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have finalized a landmark agreement that will shape the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations. The agreement focuses on mineral access and war recovery.

After a tense March meeting, Trump and Zelenskyy signed a deal on Wednesday, April 30, 2025, granting the U.S. preferential mineral rights in Ukraine in exchange for continued military support. Glenn analyzed an earlier version of the agreement in March, when Zelenskyy rejected it, highlighting its potential benefits for America, Ukraine, and Europe. Glenn praised the deal’s strategic alignment with U.S. interests, including reducing reliance on China for critical minerals and fostering regional peace.

However, the agreement signed this week differs from the March proposal Glenn praised. Negotiations led to significant revisions, reflecting compromises on both sides. What changes were made? What did each leader seek, and what did they achieve? How will this deal impact the future of U.S.-Ukraine relations and global geopolitics? Below, we break down the key aspects of the agreement.

What did Trump want?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Trump aimed to curb what many perceive as Ukraine’s overreliance on U.S. aid while securing strategic advantages for America. His primary goals included obtaining reimbursement for the billions in military aid provided to Ukraine, gaining exclusive access to Ukraine’s valuable minerals (such as titanium, uranium, and lithium), and reducing Western dependence on China for critical resources. These minerals are essential for aerospace, energy, and technology sectors, and Trump saw their acquisition as a way to bolster U.S. national security and economic competitiveness. Additionally, he sought to advance peace talks to end the Russia-Ukraine war, positioning the U.S. as a key mediator.

Ultimately, Trump secured preferential—but not exclusive—rights to extract Ukraine’s minerals through the United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund, as outlined in the agreement. The U.S. will not receive reimbursement for past aid, but future military contributions will count toward the joint fund, designed to support Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Zelenskyy’s commitment to peace negotiations under U.S. leadership aligns with Trump’s goal of resolving the conflict, giving him leverage in discussions with Russia.

These outcomes partially meet Trump’s objectives. The preferential mineral rights strengthen U.S. access to critical resources, but the lack of exclusivity and reimbursement limits the deal’s financial benefits. The peace commitment, however, positions Trump as a central figure in shaping the war’s resolution, potentially enhancing his diplomatic influence.

What did Zelenskyy want?

Global Images Ukraine / Contributor | Getty Images

Zelenskyy sought to sustain U.S. military and economic support without the burden of repaying past aid, which has been critical for Ukraine’s defense against Russia. He also prioritized reconstruction funds to rebuild Ukraine’s war-torn economy and infrastructure. Security guarantees from the U.S. to deter future Russian aggression were a key demand, though controversial, as they risked entangling America in long-term commitments. Additionally, Zelenskyy aimed to retain control over Ukraine’s mineral wealth to safeguard national sovereignty and align with the country’s European Union membership aspirations.

The final deal delivered several of Zelenskyy’s priorities. The reconstruction fund, supported by future U.S. aid, provides a financial lifeline for Ukraine’s recovery without requiring repayment of past assistance. Ukraine retained ownership of its subsoil and decision-making authority over mineral extraction, granting only preferential access to the U.S. However, Zelenskyy conceded on security guarantees, a significant compromise, and agreed to pursue peace talks under Trump’s leadership, which may involve territorial or political concessions to Russia.

Zelenskyy’s outcomes reflect a delicate balance. The reconstruction fund and retained mineral control bolster Ukraine’s economic and sovereign interests, but the absence of security guarantees and pressure to negotiate peace could strain domestic support and challenge Ukraine’s long-term stability.

What does this mean for the future?

Handout / Handout | Getty Images

While Trump didn’t secure all his demands, the deal advances several of his broader strategic goals. By gaining access to Ukraine’s mineral riches, the U.S. undermines China’s dominance over critical elements like lithium and graphite, essential for technology and energy industries. This shift reduces American and European dependence on Chinese supply chains, strengthening Western industrial and tech sectors. Most significantly, the agreement marks a pivotal step toward peace in Europe. Ending the Russia-Ukraine war, which has claimed thousands of lives, is a top priority for Trump, and Zelenskyy’s commitment to U.S.-led peace talks enhances Trump’s leverage in negotiations with Russia. Notably, the deal avoids binding U.S. commitments to Ukraine’s long-term defense, preserving flexibility for future administrations.

The deal’s broader implications align with the vision Glenn outlined in March, when he praised its potential to benefit America, Ukraine, and Europe by securing resources and creating peace. While the final agreement differs from Glenn's hopes, it still achieves key goals he outlined.

Did Trump's '51st state' jab just cost Canada its independence?

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

Did Canadians just vote in their doom?

On April 28, 2025, Canada held its federal election, and what began as a promising conservative revival ended in a Liberal Party regroup, fueled by an anti-Trump narrative. This outcome is troubling for Canada, as Glenn revealed when he exposed the globalist tendencies of the new Prime Minister, Mark Carney. On a recent episode of his podcast, Glenn hosted former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, who provided insight into Carney’s history. She revealed that, as governor of the Bank of England, Carney contributed to the 2022 pension crisis through policies that triggered excessive money printing, leading to rampant inflation.

Carney’s election and the Liberal Party’s fourth consecutive victory spell trouble for a Canada already straining under globalist policies. Many believed Canadians were fed up with the progressive agenda when former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned amid plummeting public approval. Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, started 2025 with a 25-point lead over his Liberal rivals, fueling optimism about his inevitable victory.

So, what went wrong? How did Poilievre go from predicted Prime Minister to losing his own parliamentary seat? And what details of this election could cost Canada dearly?

A Costly Election

Mark Carney (left) and Pierre Poilievre (right)

GEOFF ROBINSPETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

The election defied the expectations of many analysts who anticipated a Conservative win earlier this year.

For Americans unfamiliar with parliamentary systems, here’s a brief overview of Canada’s federal election process. Unlike U.S. presidential elections, Canadians do not directly vote for their Prime Minister. Instead, they vote for a political party. Each Canadian resides in a "riding," similar to a U.S. congressional district, and during the election, each riding elects a Member of Parliament (MP). The party that secures the majority of MPs forms the government and appoints its leader as Prime Minister.

At the time of writing, the Liberal Party has secured 169 of the 172 seats needed for a majority, all but ensuring their victory. In contrast, the Conservative Party holds 144 seats, indicating that the Liberal Party will win by a solid margin, which will make passing legislation easier. This outcome is a far cry from the landslide Conservative victory many had anticipated.

Poilievre's Downfall

PETER POWER / Contributor | Getty Images

What caused Poilievre’s dramatic fall from front-runner to losing his parliamentary seat?

Despite his surge in popularity earlier this year, which coincided with enthusiasm surrounding Trump’s inauguration, many attribute the Conservative loss to Trump’s influence. Commentators argue that Trump’s repeated references to Canada as the "51st state" gave Liberals a rallying cry: Canadian sovereignty. The Liberal Party framed a vote for Poilievre as a vote to surrender Canada to U.S. influence, positioning Carney as the defender of national independence.

Others argue that Poilievre’s lackluster campaign was to blame. Critics suggest he should have embraced a Trump-style, Canada-first message, emphasizing a balanced relationship with the U.S. rather than distancing himself from Trump’s annexation remarks. By failing to counter the Liberal narrative effectively, Poilievre lost momentum and voter confidence.

This election marks a pivotal moment for Canada, with far-reaching implications for its sovereignty and economic stability. As Glenn has warned, Carney’s globalist leanings could align Canada more closely with international agendas, potentially at the expense of its national interests. Canadians now face the challenge of navigating this new political landscape under a leader with a controversial track record.