Sabo STRIKES AGAIN: 5 new DEVASTATING pieces from the anti-woke street artist

Courtesy of Sabo

Last August, the infamous anti-woke guerilla street artist known as Sabo displayed several shocking posters at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas, criticizing American Airlines’ controversial woke policies. Glenn has become a fan of Sabo's work, applauding him for his edgy, yet strikingly powerful art, which conveys important messages that not everyone is brave enough to convey in public.

This week, Sabo is BACK, and this time, he hit the streets of Los Angeles, taking aim at Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom, BLM, and more. He gave glennbeck.com exclusive access to his latest installation, which leaves NO ONE from the establishment unscathed.

You can find Sabo's entire collection HERE. In the meantime, here are five of our favorite pieces from Sabo's latest anti-woke art campaign:

"STOP!"

Sabo's "STOP

Courtesy of Sabo

A prominent theme in Sabo's work is keeping the establishment accountable by laying their hypocrisy bare for all to see. Sabo's brilliance lies in the fact that he never puts words in the establishment's mouth. He lets their words, actions, and hypocrisy speak for themselves.

This theme is perfectly exemplified in this particular stop sign piece in which Sabo captures one of the more infamous moments when Joe Biden displayed questionable behavior towards minors. Sabo remarked how he had wanted to do a stop sign piece for years because they are, in his words, "so in your face." The perfect opportunity arose when he came across the viral clip of Joe Biden sniffing the hair of the young girl depicted in the poster. He said:

When I saw that particular picture of that girl pulling away from Biden, she was just screaming, 'STOP!' And I knew it was perfect [for the piece].

The media has worked diligently to cover up Biden's questionable behavior with minors. But Sabo isn't giving him a free pass, and he doesn't need to insert his own opinions to do so. He lets Biden's behavior speak for itself.

"Exodus East"

Sabo's "Exodus East" road sign art piece is on display in Downtown LA

Courtesy of Sabo

The theme of letting the establishment's actions speak for themselves permeates Sabo's "Totem" collection consisting of repurposed street signs. Sabo says this collection represents "the collisions our country has suffered throughout the past couple of years." From the COVID pandemic to January 6, Sabo's stark messaging forces the viewer to recall the hypocrisy and corruption latent in the establishment's responses to these landmark events that shook our nation to its core.

In this particular street sign piece, Sabo wanted to commemorate those affected by Newsom's draconian COVID mandates that left thousands jobless, out of business, and destitute while Newsom himself was dining at the French Laundry with the nation's elite:

I wanted to mount [this piece] in Los Angeles because it basically tells a story of this particular time. COVID, Newsom, and I want to commemorate the people who said, 'I love this state, but I have to go.'

Sabo's stark messaging forces the viewer to recall the hypocrisy and corruption latent in the establishment's responses to these landmark events that shook our nation to its core.

The name of the collection, "Totem," came from Sabo's friend who remarked that the pieces reminded him of the Totem poles from Indigenous tribes. Embedded within the Totem poles themselves are the stories of a people, forcing the viewer to recall significant events in their cultural history as it's passed down from generation to generation. Sabo hopes to achieve the same effect through this collection:

In a graphic sort of way, these pieces are like stained-glass art. People would look at them and tell these stories. God willing 100 years from now, if they still stand, people will be reminded of them.

Sabo's work is for the Americans who are fed up and disillusioned with the lack of accountability towards their government. During the pandemic, Americans were censured for going against the mainstream COVID narrative, forced to choose between complying with draconian mandates and putting food on their table, all the while watching their rulers have their cake and eat it too. Two years after the pandemic, the establishment still hasn't been held responsible—and Sabo won't let us forget, despite the ruling class' best efforts.

"Full Mental Jacka**"

Sabo displays his poster, "Full Metal Jacka**," which is inspired from the movie poster of hte Vietnam War-era film, "Full Metal Jacket."

Courtesy of Sabo

Remember how the Left called Trump a "warmonger" and warned that he would march us toward World War III? Sabo's take on the Vietnam war-era Full Metal Jacket film poster exposes the irony that it is Biden—not Trump—that has brought us to the precipice of a global War. He said:

The thing that Democrats said Trump would get us into, Biden is getting us into. They failed with Afghanistan. There's a war with Ukraine, and we're getting into a war with Russia. And there's China with Taiwan. Now we're here with Israel and Iran. We are headed towards war.

Sabo remarked on the difficulty of preserving his art. Most of his pieces are vandalized on the street or taken down all together, and those pieces that survive are refused by galleries due to their controversial nature. He said:

I hate that art has become so weak that there probably isn't a gallery in this country that would show these pieces of art.

But Sabo also said the struggle behind his work is implicit within the genre itself, that edgy art with controversial messages is often not accepted in its own time. He said:

I think that's what edgy art is really about. At first, it's not accepted. It's shunned. And later on, people will be able to look at it in a different light, and hopefully, that's how it will be with these pieces.

Ironically, several of these pieces from Sabo's collection have been preserved in a museum, but not for the reasons that you would expect. The Smithsonian acquired multiple of Sabo's pieces in their January 6 installment.

"One Bad Dude: Cornpop"

Courtesy of Sabo

This piece is Sabo's ode to young rappers. Sabo is fascinated with the pro-Trump fervor amongst the new up-and-coming generation of rappers, breaking from their Democrat-dominant predecessors. Sabo says:

Young rappers want Trump because they see what Biden and the Democrats have done to their community.

Sabo once again exposes the irony of the establishment's propaganda. Democrats promised to better the lives of minorities, yet it was Trump who ushered in America's greatest economic era to date, including the lowest unemployment rates for both African Americans and Latino Americans.

Sabo once again exposes the irony of the establishment's propaganda.

Younger generations are experiencing the stark contrast between the Trump-era economic boom and Bidenomics. Sabo said young people "can't afford to eat. They can't afford gas. They can't afford rent," things that they didn't experience under the Trump administration.

The establishment is yet again trying to silence Trump ahead of the 2024 election. Amid an onslaught of indictments and legal suits, Trump has proven one thing: he is a fighter. Nothing exemplifies this more than his mugshot which has become an icon of the resistance against the establishment's onslaught of censorship of those who Trump represents: freedom-loving Americans. Sabo said his rendition of Trump's mugshot was "my way of communicating that he's a bit of a hard thug."

Courtesy of Sabo

Much of Sabo's art has a short shelf life, and not for a lack of relevance or talent. Most of his art pieces are either vandalized or taken down completely within a day of going public. To deter this vandalism, Sabo said he wanted to "come up with a method where people couldn't reach them," and this collection presented the perfect opportunity.

Sabo created multiple pieces depicting Hamas paragliders, which has become one of the most haunting images to emerge from the October 7th terrorist attacks that killed 1,400 Israeli men, women, and children, the largest attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust. This collection calls out BLM's support for the Hamas terrorist, referencing BLM Chicago's tweet in the wake of the attacks that voiced their support for Palestine alongside the same image of the Hamas paragliders. Though they quickly removed the tweet due to backlash, Sabo wouldn't let them get away with it. He says,

I figured the paragliders come from the sky and the air, so it will have the impression of paragliders coming down like they did in Israel. At the same time, I wanted to take a jab at BLM.

Unfortunately, even though the paragliders were hung from a telephone wire and streetlights, this wouldn't deter whoever took down most of the pieces by morning.

The dangerous lie: Rights as government privileges, not God-given

Bloomberg / Contributor | Getty Images

When politicians claim that rights flow from the state, they pave the way for tyranny.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) recently delivered a lecture that should alarm every American. During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, he argued that believing rights come from a Creator rather than government is the same belief held by Iran’s theocratic regime.

Kaine claimed that the principles underpinning Iran’s dictatorship — the same regime that persecutes Sunnis, Jews, Christians, and other minorities — are also the principles enshrined in our Declaration of Independence.

In America, rights belong to the individual. In Iran, rights serve the state.

That claim exposes either a profound misunderstanding or a reckless indifference to America’s founding. Rights do not come from government. They never did. They come from the Creator, as the Declaration of Independence proclaims without qualification. Jefferson didn’t hedge. Rights are unalienable — built into every human being.

This foundation stands worlds apart from Iran. Its leaders invoke God but grant rights only through clerical interpretation. Freedom of speech, property, religion, and even life itself depend on obedience to the ruling clerics. Step outside their dictates, and those so-called rights vanish.

This is not a trivial difference. It is the essence of liberty versus tyranny. In America, rights belong to the individual. The government’s role is to secure them, not define them. In Iran, rights serve the state. They empower rulers, not the people.

From Muhammad to Marx

The same confusion applies to Marxist regimes. The Soviet Union’s constitutions promised citizens rights — work, health care, education, freedom of speech — but always with fine print. If you spoke out against the party, those rights evaporated. If you practiced religion openly, you were charged with treason. Property and voting were allowed as long as they were filtered and controlled by the state — and could be revoked at any moment. Rights were conditional, granted through obedience.

Kaine seems to be advocating a similar approach — whether consciously or not. By claiming that natural rights are somehow comparable to sharia law, he ignores the critical distinction between inherent rights and conditional privileges. He dismisses the very principle that made America a beacon of freedom.

Jefferson and the founders understood this clearly. “We are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights,” they wrote. No government, no cleric, no king can revoke them. They exist by virtue of humanity itself. The government exists to protect them, not ration them.

This is not a theological quibble. It is the entire basis of our government. Confuse the source of rights, and tyranny hides behind piety or ideology. The people are disempowered. Clerics, bureaucrats, or politicians become arbiters of what rights citizens may enjoy.

John Greim / Contributor | Getty Images

Gifts from God, not the state

Kaine’s statement reflects either a profound ignorance of this principle or an ideological bias that favors state power over individual liberty. Either way, Americans must recognize the danger. Understanding the origin of rights is not academic — it is the difference between freedom and submission, between the American experiment and theocratic or totalitarian rule.

Rights are not gifts from the state. They are gifts from God, secured by reason, protected by law, and defended by the people. Every American must understand this. Because when rights come from government instead of the Creator, freedom disappears.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

POLL: Is America’s next generation trading freedom for equity?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

A recent poll conducted by Justin Haskins, a long-time friend of the show, has uncovered alarming trends among young Americans aged 18-39, revealing a generation grappling with deep frustrations over economic hardships, housing affordability, and a perceived rigged system that favors the wealthy, corporations, and older generations. While nearly half of these likely voters approve of President Trump, seeing him as an anti-establishment figure, over 70% support nationalizing major industries, such as healthcare, energy, and big tech, to promote "equity." Shockingly, 53% want a democratic socialist to win the 2028 presidential election, including a third of Trump voters and conservatives in this age group. Many cite skyrocketing housing costs, unfair taxation on the middle class, and a sense of being "stuck" or in crisis as driving forces, with 62% believing the economy is tilted against them and 55% backing laws to confiscate "excess wealth" like second homes or luxury items to help first-time buyers.

This blend of Trump support and socialist leanings suggests a volatile mix: admiration for disruptors who challenge the status quo, coupled with a desire for radical redistribution to address personal struggles. Yet, it raises profound questions about the roots of this discontent—Is it a failure of education on history's lessons about socialism's failures? Media indoctrination? Or genuine systemic barriers? And what does it portend for the nation’s trajectory—greater division, a shift toward authoritarian policies, or an opportunity for renewal through timeless values like hard work and individual responsibility?

Glenn wants to know what YOU think: Where do Gen Z's socialist sympathies come from? What does it mean for the future of America? Make your voice heard in the poll below:

Do you believe the Gen Z support for socialism comes from perceived economic frustrations like unaffordable housing and a rigged system favoring the wealthy and corporations?

Do you believe the Gen Z support for socialism, including many Trump supporters, is due to a lack of education about the historical failures of socialist systems?

Do you think that these poll results indicate a growing generational divide that could lead to more political instability and authoritarian tendencies in America's future?

Do you think that this poll implies that America's long-term stability relies on older generations teaching Gen Z and younger to prioritize self-reliance, free-market ideals, and personal accountability?

Do you think the Gen Z support for Trump is an opportunity for conservatives to win them over with anti-establishment reforms that preserve liberty?

Americans expose Supreme Court’s flag ruling as a failed relic

Anna Moneymaker / Staff | Getty Images

In a nation where the Stars and Stripes symbolize the blood-soaked sacrifices of our heroes, President Trump's executive order to crack down on flag desecration amid violent protests has ignited fierce debate. But in a recent poll, Glenn asked the tough question: Can Trump protect the Flag without TRAMPLING free speech? Glenn asked, and you answered—thousands weighed in on this pressing clash between free speech and sacred symbols.

The results paint a picture of resounding distrust toward institutional leniency. A staggering 85% of respondents support banning the burning of American flags when it incites violence or disturbs the peace, a bold rejection of the chaos we've seen from George Floyd riots to pro-Palestinian torchings. Meanwhile, 90% insist that protections for burning other flags—like Pride or foreign banners—should not be treated the same as Old Glory under the First Amendment, exposing the hypocrisy in equating our nation's emblem with fleeting symbols. And 82% believe the Supreme Court's Texas v. Johnson ruling, shielding flag burning as "symbolic speech," should not stand without revision—can the official story survive such resounding doubt from everyday Americans weary of government inaction?

Your verdict sends a thunderous message: In this divided era, the flag demands defense against those who exploit freedoms to sow disorder, without trampling the liberties it represents. It's a catastrophic failure of the establishment to ignore this groundswell.

Want to make your voice heard? Check out more polls HERE.

Labor Day EXPOSED: The Marxist roots you weren’t told about

JOSEPH PREZIOSO / Contributor | Getty Images

During your time off this holiday, remember the man who started it: Peter J. McGuire, a racist Marxist who co-founded America’s first socialist party.

Labor Day didn’t begin as a noble tribute to American workers. It began as a negotiation with ideological terrorists.

In the late 1800s, factory and mine conditions were brutal. Workers endured 12-to-15-hour days, often seven days a week, in filthy, dangerous environments. Wages were low, injuries went uncompensated, and benefits didn’t exist. Out of desperation, Americans turned to labor unions. Basic protections had to be fought for because none were guaranteed.

Labor Day wasn’t born out of gratitude. It was a political payoff to Marxist radicals who set trains ablaze and threatened national stability.

That era marked a seismic shift — much like today. The Industrial Revolution, like our current digital and political upheaval, left millions behind. And wherever people get left behind, Marxists see an opening.

A revolutionary wedge

This was Marxism’s moment.

Economic suffering created fertile ground for revolutionary agitation. Marxists, socialists, and anarchists stepped in to stoke class resentment. Their goal was to turn the downtrodden into a revolutionary class, tear down the existing system, and redistribute wealth by force.

Among the most influential agitators was Peter J. McGuire, a devout Irish Marxist from New York. In 1874, he co-founded the Social Democratic Workingmens Party of North America, the first Marxist political party in the United States. He was also a vice president of the American Federation of Labor, which would become the most powerful union in America.

McGuire’s mission wasn’t hidden. He wanted to transform the U.S. into a socialist nation through labor unions.

That mission soon found a useful symbol.

In the 1880s, labor leaders in Toronto invited McGuire to attend their annual labor festival. Inspired, he returned to New York and launched a similar parade on Sept. 5 — chosen because it fell halfway between Independence Day and Thanksgiving.

The first parade drew over 30,000 marchers who skipped work to hear speeches about eight-hour workdays and the alleged promise of Marxism. The parade caught on across the country.

Negotiating with radicals

By 1894, Labor Day had been adopted by 30 states. But the federal government had yet to make it a national holiday. A major strike changed everything.

In Pullman, Illinois, home of the Pullman railroad car company, tensions exploded. The economy tanked. George Pullman laid off hundreds of workers and slashed wages for those who remained — yet refused to lower the rent on company-owned homes.

That injustice opened the door for Marxist agitators to mobilize.

Sympathetic railroad workers joined the strike. Riots broke out. Hundreds of railcars were torched. Mail service was disrupted. The nation’s rail system ground to a halt.

President Grover Cleveland — under pressure in a midterm election year — panicked. He sent 12,000 federal troops to Chicago. Two strikers were killed in the resulting clashes.

With the crisis spiraling and Democrats desperate to avoid political fallout, Cleveland struck a deal. Within six days of breaking the strike, Congress rushed through legislation making Labor Day a federal holiday.

It was the first of many concessions Democrats would make to organized labor in exchange for political power.

What we really celebrated

Labor Day wasn’t born out of gratitude. It was a political payoff to Marxist radicals who set trains ablaze and threatened national stability.

Kean Collection / Staff | Getty Images

What we celebrated was a Canadian idea, brought to America by the founder of the American Socialist Party, endorsed by racially exclusionary unions, and made law by a president and Congress eager to save face.

It was the first of many bones thrown by the Democratic Party to union power brokers. And it marked the beginning of a long, costly compromise with ideologues who wanted to dismantle the American way of life — from the inside out.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.