Andrii Telizhenko is calling out the DNC for corruption in Ukraine, but the mainstream media will not listen! As a former adviser to both Ukraine's prosecutor general Victor Shokin and the Ukrainian embassy in Washington, he refused to work with the DNC to dig up dirt on Trump. He describes how Alexandra Chalupa introduced herself as a DNC worker, how conservatives were blocked from communicating, and how it's no secret in Ukraine why Biden demanded Shokin be fired. According to Telizhenko, this meddling was one of the main reasons the Ukrainian people voted a COMEDIAN into office instead of another politician. He has seen firsthand the how the mainstream media is rewriting this story, but the facts WILL be set straight!
©2024 MERCURY RADIO ARTS.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
RADIO
March 19, 2025
Trump Must Reveal These Cover-Ups After the JFK Files
The Trump administration is releasing the JFK Files. But it can’t stop there! Glenn reviews the other government secrets that must be revealed. Of course, we’re still waiting on the DOJ to release the Epstein List. There’s also the information on Diddy’s alleged clients. How could these 2 men have been jailed, but none of their clients have been looked into?! Who were they working for? What about Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi scandal or the Sandy Berger scandal? Who tried to cover up the Hunter Biden laptop scandal? Who placed the pipe bombs at the Capitol on January 6th? Who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines? Are UFOs real? What is the Pentagon hiding? The American people have demanded an era of radical transparency. So, Glenn asks Donald Trump to make it happen!
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: So I'm -- you know, the JFK files are coming out today. I would love to hear your opinion. 888-727-BECK.
What are we going to find there?
I don't think we're going to find a who. We're going to find a system. If we find anything. And if we don't find anything. It was a big mistake to start with this. For the Trump administration. I mean,, you know, you should start with something that we have something on. Or people are just -- it's just going to make the conspiracy theory even bigger. See, I told you, they didn't release everything.
But we were talking about the other things that need to be released. Like Sandy Berger. Apparently, we do know what the documents were. We do know why what happened afterwards, happened. Right?
STU: Again, if you believe these stories. My understanding of this. Is copies of the report, of the Clinton administration's handling of -- you know -- remember the millennium bomb. Was it LAX, firm it right?
GLENN: Oh. The millennium bombing.
STU: That's what I'm remembering.
GLENN: I was thinking about the Atlanta bombing.
STU: That was '90s. Yeah. I think -- by the way, came across the Canadian border. I'm looking for -- to blow up the LAK. They responded.
It was their response. How they handle it had. How seriously they took the threat of al-Qaeda at the time. And the theory is that, they were trying to avoid embarrassment for how badly they handled that and the aftermath before 9/11, because he was about to testify in front of the 9/11 commission.
I guess that's possible. I mean, the other thing is, they were copies of this document. So there is an original.
Like, so why would -- why would you risk this incriminating.
GLENN: That's a good example of, I -- so if that's all true about Sandy Berger. I want to know why he got three years.
STU: Three years.
GLENN: One year without his -- no wait. Three years of suspended.
STU: Two years probation. 50,000-dollar fine.
GLENN: Right. If you would have done that. I would have done that, we would have gone to prison for a very, very long time.
STU: I would think so.
GLENN: So I would like to know, again, the thing on that one, if there's nothing with the papers. Who made that happen?
And why didn't that person get prosecuted.
I think some of the these things, they're not going to be so shocking, with what they come out with.
I think what's going to be interesting is -- and important, is who covered this up?
Who covered up somebody doing something item, illegal, but not necessarily wholly nefarious.
You know what I mean?
And then, you know, somebody stepped up, and said, let's make this go away. That can't happen.
That's what's causing so many of our problems.
People are like, I would have gone to jail for that. Why didn't he?
And even if it's just something simple, because he had a good friend up above that could make that go away for him. And that's the only nefarious thing is just connections.
That's enough.
And those people need to go to jail. Let me give you some other stuff. Okay. So you have Sandy Berger.
The Hillary Clinton/Benghazi stuff. You know, it does matter, Hillary. It does!
What the hell was happening in Benghazi?
You know, the ambassador, Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods. Glen Doherty. What happened to those guys? Why were they even in Benghazi?
My theory, they were running guns. Or the ambassador was trying to stop the gunrunning, or continue the gunrunning. To, you know, Lindsey Graham's favorite, and John McCain's favorite group, which is now in charge of Syria and killing all the Christians. By the way, I just want you to know that.
The House spent $7 million. Found no smoking gun. Of course, Clinton, you know -- what's weird is all of her, you know, hard drives just kind of disappeared.
Why -- why was she saying immediately that this was a 9/11 video, when it wasn't?
30,000 deleted messages. That's a sideshow.
I mean, just -- what happened there?
We need to know.
Why where the state department's logs. Clubbed. Cables scrubbed.
Realtime decisions scrubbed. Why wouldn't you let the Navy fly the ship? First, they said, we didn't have any planes there. And then the Naval officers were like, I can't take it anymore. Yes, we could have done something. They told us not to.
Then you have the Biden family corruption.
Hunter's laptop. You know, I want to know. So you don't go after Hunter Biden.
I want to know who in the FBI was in charge of that laptop, making sure that nobody knew about that laptop. I want to know all of the people that were involved in saying, oh, you know what, that's just a conspiracy theory.
I want those people to go to jail.
Burisma!
$83,000 a month, for Hunter. No energy experience.
What happened to that?
How come there were -- I know that there were people in the State Department, if I'm not mistaken, that came and said to the White House and Joe Biden, this is a problem.
This is a problem. Well, if it's a problem then, it's a problem now. And are we ever going to correct it?
And it's not about going after Biden or whatever. It's about making sure this system works.
Because if you can't trust it, I mean, all of that stuff, Jeffrey Epstein.
He hangs himself with a paper sheet. Okay.
Conveniently when one camera goes down, and it's the one camera on his cell. Oh. And what were they sleeping?
Oh, was it -- the two guards that were supposed -- all of a sudden, they fell asleep.
Okay. Could be. Could be.
Or, is it because, I mean, the flight logs, from the Lolita Express show Bill Clinton 26 times on that plane. Twenty -- Trump, once.
Prince Andrew, dozens.
The -- the lawsuit against Maxwell, unsealed bits of it in 2024. But they don't detail anything.
Why is this still being held?
Now, I'm fine. But I haven't heard Pam Bondi say, we're not discussing this. Because there's an investigation going. And charges are pending.
That would make me happy. But that's not what they're saying. Why?
See, this is -- this is why I think the most likely thing is, it's just going to show us today, these JFK files. It's just going to show us, just a failed system.
That's what it's going to show us. A failed system.
And there's nothing that they really -- were hiding, except their mass incompetence.
Because, I mean, you could look at all of these things and say, it was mass incompetence.
I don't believe it was. I know something happened with Benghazi.
I don't know about 9/11, you know, Sandy Berger stuff.
I don't know about that. And that involved Clinton. And I believe George H.W. Bush.
Maybe it was just. I heard at the time. It was just Bush and Clinton.
I don't know. But who made that go away?
Where are the tapes and the photos and all the names from Epstein? Who was Epstein really collecting all of this stuff?
Who was he doing it for?
P. Diddy.
What's happening with Diddy.
Arrested September 2024. Sex trafficking.
Racketeering. Freakoffs. Coerced women.
Drugs. Recordings.
Children. It's pretty ugly.
Why -- why didn't we know about that know. Why is nothing happening. Isn't he in Yale?
PAT: Yeah.
GLENN: So how is it that Epstein and see Diddy can go to jail. But no one else can go to jail.
There's no one else involved in that. What about the people who were buying the children. Or were part of the -- what happened?
STU: I mean, Ghislaine Maxwell. She did.
GLENN: But she was just recruiting the kids.
STU: She was very heavily involved.
GLENN: I know. She was recruiting the kids. But where are the buyers?
It's like slavery is wrong. And we will get all those slave traders. But nobody looks at the buyers. The ones actually that bought all the slaves. And were whipping the slaves the whole time.
You're like, you know, the there's one party we're missing here.
Why aren't we doing that?
I don't know. You know, the seized footage. That should be out.
Who is holding?
Who is holding those things back?
And it could be a very good reason. Because charges are pending.
But do you believe that?
Because I don't. I don't. I hope. But I don't believe that.
I want to believe that. The Nord Stream pipeline. You had the president of the United States come out and say, it will be no more.
You know what will stop this? The Nord Stream pipeline will be no more. Mr. President, what do you mean by that? Trust me, we have our ways. There won't be a Nord Stream pipeline.
Then it's blown up underwater in an operation, that really everyone -- every expert in the world says only the United States could have done that.
And we're -- we're expected to believe that it was, what?
A husband and wife on a rented yacht, that got on their scuba gear and set up this elaborate explosion and got away with it. Come on!
Please. You know, and another thing that needs to be exposed, because these things have consequences.
January 6th. The pipe bomber. The FBI, that was on the grounds of January 6th.
Why -- how was that coordinated?
And if it was, you know, if it was the -- if it was the Trump campaign, and Glenn Beck was the president of it. Then that should be known.
And I should have a trial. A fair trial to make my case. But that should be known. I don't care who it is, that needs to be known.
How come none of that is -- how come none of that is -- how come no one is asking.
If Joe Biden was so incompetent, he couldn't run for president, he could run the White House. Oh. And, by the way, then we find out, that none of the signatures are his! All of these bills that he signed. Like, one of them.
One of them.
And you know which one it was?
The one saying, I am not going to run again.
I won't run for a second term. That's the only one that was his.
Why? Why was that the only one that was his?
Is that because that's the only one he was really involved in.
I don't know. But who was hiding his actual condition?
Isn't that important to know?
You know, you have the Butler, Pennsylvania, shooter. Thomas Crooks.
You now have people saying in the Secret Service and other places, you know, USAID.
Those kinds of people that have been overthrowing governments. That's -- that's trained.
We recognize that.
Okay?
How about the shooter, in Vegas?
Why the hell don't we know anything about that know. Are you kidding me? Nothing?
The COVID stuff. Why is nobody going to jail on that.
They perjured themselves in front of Congress.
Millions of people died. What?
By the way, we have the MLK tapes. The RFK.
Those are still sealed. Why, again?
And are those the ones that are important to us now?
I guess, if you have to take it in order.
But those aren't the ones. What happened to RFK, JFK, MLK? I would like to know. But those aren't the ones like, we've got to know right now!
Why is there a Congressional slush fund? $17 million paid out since 1997 for harassment claims, and we don't know who those harassment claims were about in Congress.
That's my tax money.
$17 million, went to cover-up, you know, sexual harassment claims.
Settled. With my money. Your money. No names. No dates. No amounts. Should all be opened up.
The Pentagon and the UFO. The chemical trails.
I don't know. Is that true. I don't know!
But none of this can be believed until we are completely transparent.
And then you'll reduce the population down to about six to 8 percent that just never believe anything.
And you can live as a society like that.
You cannot live with 20, 40, 50 percent saying, I don't trust anything that comes from the government.
That's what has to be corrected.
And it has to start today.
RADIO
March 18, 2025
JFK Files: 4 Big Revelations
President Trump is releasing the JFK Files after decades of secrecy. But Glenn warns: it’s important that we don’t chase the “who.” The question that really matters is, WHAT were they protecting? Was the government hiding the illusion of competence? Do these documents reveal the Deep State of the 60s? Did Lee Harvey Oswald have help? Did elements of our government look the other way? Or were they trying to stop the domino effect? Glenn predicts that the Kennedy Files aren’t about Oswald. They’re about us. If we can stare down 1963, we can demand 2024’s truth too. The “what” they’ve protected has kept us blind. Trump is betting we can handle it.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: All right. I want to talk to you about the JFK files. Which were three hours -- two hours away from being released now.
If you're listening to us live.
Two hours away. And I'm interested to see what's in it.
Tulsi Gabbard is the one who is overseeing it. Representative Anna Paulina Luna. She has been relentlessly pushing for this since February. Trump has seen all the files.
He calls them, quote, very interesting, but he's leaving the judgment up to us.
Now, very interesting is different than when he said, he was talked into making sure, they don't go out. By others.
He didn't name the others.
But here we are, 62 years after Kennedy was killed here in Dallas.
And we're finally getting the vault cracked open?
I think it's important, and I could be wrong on this. I think it's important for us to not look and chase the Who. But there was somebody else in the grassy knoll.
There might have been. I don't know. I don't think that's what we were looking at though. I think we're looking at the "what." Not who they have been protecting, but what have they been protecting?
Why has it taken so long?
And not for names, but for the principles, the systems. The intangibles, that have been buried with these papers.
The steaks are pretty high here. You know, what happens if we get 80,000 pages and there's, meh. I mean, that's a possibility.
That's going to be really bad for the conspiracy theorists.
Because they're going to say, see. They didn't release it all. 80,000 pages, and they didn't release it all.
The question that has to be answered is, why did it take this long?
Let's go back.
Look at the steaks. November 22nd. 1963. Kennedy is shot.
And America changes at that moment.
I mean, our innocence goes away.
We have a president that is killed. And our innocence takes a bullet as well.
And the Warren commission pins it on Oswald.
But the doubts fester. Witnesses. Ballistics. Missing pieces.
The note from Evelyn Lincoln, the secretary of Kennedy.
Who said, I -- my husband, was in a restaurant, two days before President Kennedy was going to Dallas.
And overheard two people in the booth saying, well, he will be dead. He won't come back from Dallas.
Her husband listened to it, called the White House. And said, Evelyn, you've got to tell him not to go. She went in. And told President Kennedy, my husband just overheard a plot.
He said, if -- Evelyn, they're going to kill me in Dallas. They're going to kill me, going to my churchgoing on Sunday.
They will kill me one way or thorough. So I'm not changing my life.
Two days later, he was dead. Now, the witnesses, the ballistics, the missing pieces, tomorrow I am going out. I will do some live thing out, with just -- on, I don't know, X. We have the exact copy of the gun. I don't know if there is another one like it. Because it -- it took -- a friend of ours, Paul Vienes (phonetic). He is from the World War II museum, the Museum of the American soldier down in College Station. And it's this great museum.
And he is -- I mean, you put him on something, and he is like a dog with a bone. He's not going to stop. And it took him like two years to re-create this rifle. And to get exactly the rifle, it's very -- kind of a rare rifle in itself.
It's impossible to find the scope that he used.
And it was augmented in different ways. And so Paul has put this whole rifle together.
He brought it up. Gave it to our museum. And I will take the rifle out. We've had to go order, because it takes special shells as well.
So we will -- we will go out to the range tomorrow or the next day. And we will try to do the shots.
And I am bringing a couple of sharpshooters as well. I know I won't be able to do it. I might be able to hit the shot, but I don't know if I'll be able to hit the time. Maybe a couple of sharpshooters can do it. I don't know!
But it's not an easy shot. It's not an easy shot. But it could be done.
Here's the problem: In 1992, Congress passed a law saying, release everything by 2017, that isn't a national security risk.
Well, that deadline passed over and over and over again. And we got it in dribs and drabs. Now Trump is saying, release all of it.
80,000 pages, unfiltered.
On what's the -- what?
They have been guarded. I don't think it's a who. It's a what.
What have they been guarding?
It's got to be something kind of big, right? So what could it be?
Let's go through some of the options. Maybe what they've been covering or hiding, is the illusion of competence.
What if they've been protecting the myth that the government knows what its doing. We're totally competent.
No, you're really not. Don't ever show any of this stuff.
Because it will show how bad you really were. You had Oswald in your sites, so to speak.
And you did nothing. You just dropped the ball.
That could very well be it.
Just the hiding the illusion of competence.
I suspect we'll find that. 1963 was absolutely chaotic.
Cold War paranoia. CIA plots against Castro. FBI fumbling domestic threats.
Maybe the files just show Keystone Cops. Missed signals. Botched surveillance.
Agencies tripping over. Like the Keystone cops. Or Charlie chaplain follies. You know, okay. George.
Releasing that in the '60s, maybe even in the '90s, could have tanked public faith when we needed it. But we don't have any faith left, does anybody think our government is competent?
Really? Honestly?
Any? Bueller. Vietnam was heating up at the time.
The Soviets were watching.
If the files prove Kennedy died, just because of screwups, not masterminds. They're not hiding the villain.
They're hiding fragility. I think that's the most likely what, that we're going to find. That we are just the Keystone cops!
Okay. Option two. And feel free, Stu, to though an option here.
Option two. I am so sick and tired of carrying this whole show on my back. I carry you every day.
Option two. The architecture of power. This one is structural. What if those 80,000 pages map how decisions got made? How intelligence, military, and politics intertwined in ways that we're not supposed to see? Not a who shot him, but how did we operate? Think about this.
Kennedy was pushing back on the CIA. After the Bay of Pigs.
He was telling the pentagon follow-up, no.
On Cuba.
He was telling the pentagon. I'm going to get rid of all our nuclear programs.
I will negotiate with Russia. I will stop these never-ending wars.
Maybe it's the files revealing a machine that doesn't bend. And a network of influence, that outlasts any president.
Maybe it is go that reveals the Deep State that was happening back then. And they haven't held it back, because they're protecting a guilty party. But to shield the blueprint, you expose that, and you don't just rewrite 1963. You question every power play ever since.
The what, is the skeleton of authority, itself.
That's a pretty good option. Right?
Okay.
As I see it, option number three. The ghost of democracy!
What if they've been protecting the story that we tell ourselves about who we are. Kennedy's death wasn't just a tragedy, it was a mirror.
If those files say Oswald had help. Foreign or domestic. And I think this is the least likely.
If Oswald had help, foreign or domestic, or that elements of our own government looked the other way. That's possible.
It's not just history. It's an indictment. I don't know in 1963, if we could have handled that. Riots were coming. MLK. RFK would fall next. You know, maybe they locked it away, to preserve the what, of American exceptionalism. The belief that we're the good guys.
I shouldn't say that. Because I think we're the good guys. That our government and the&its many, many agencies are the good guy. So the delays about keeping that narrative alive, even if it's a lie! Fourth option.
And this one is pragmatic, but a little profound. What if the what, is the precedent of exposure?
The JFK files, and you can't stop there. We release the JFK files, we're going to say, now release Butler, Pennsylvania. Trump's brush with a bullet. Secret Service whistleblowers are already saying, the shooter wasn't a lone wolf. He was modeled. A product of a tactic that we've used abroad. And the product of a tactic that they say, we're not only using currently. But I say we were using at the time of JFK as well.
And I'm not saying that we did it. But that's what whistle-blowers in the service, is they're now saying, that that's what Butler, Pennsylvania, was all about. So if those 80,000 pages spill secrets, methods, failures, cover-ups.
It's a road map for the next demand.
Butler's files. The 9/11 loose ends.
Every classified corner.
They held it to not hide the Kennedy truth, but to protect the dam from breaking!
The what is the containment of accountability itself!
Keep everything secret.
And, you know, that's -- that's what our government does.
Thee keep, they're overclassifying everything.
Why?
Why?
Why is the left freaking out so much about DOGE?
Because there's a lot to hide there. And that's just in comparison to this kind of stuff.
That's just corruption, or waste, or incompetence.
One of the options. Maybe we're just not competent. We weren't in 1963. We know we're not now. Maybe that's what they're hiding.
Or was it -- was there more going on? Kennedy's era because of the Cold War, it was just nothing, but proxies and shadows.
And what we were doing then, became doctrine. It's why we were still at NATO. Why the hell are we still at NATO?
What is it that we're keeping at bay from NATO?
Why at least are we not demanding that the other countries start defending themselves a little bit more?
Because it's just -- it's the way it's done now.
I -- I have to tell you, the worst thing that will happen, is there's nothing in this. That the average person goes, I don't know what they were hiding.
Because if that happens, conspiracy theories go through the roof.
I mean, remember, this is from the guy who told you in what, 2005.
Or '6. You will see the time. If the government doesn't correct what they're doing right now. This was under George Bush. If they don't correct this kind of secrecy and everything right now. You will see a time where many Americans. 20 percent of Americans. It was at 6 or 7 percent at the time. Will say, we never went to the moon! We never went to the moon! Look at where we are! Look how many people are saying, we never went to the moon. We never went to the moon.
STU: And this is the thing, with like most conspiracy theories, there's no way to disprove them.
GLENN: No, I know. I know.
STU: If what comes out of this, eh, actually, we know most of the story. And it was a major failure.
But there's no -- no big conspiracy behind it. The people who have believed this, this whole time, will do exactly what you said. They'll say, well, they must be hiding all of the real stuff. Somewhere I know. I know.
There's no win.
STU: There's no live forever.
GLENN: That's why you should just release stuff going forward.
Just release it. You hold it back like this. You're not helping. You're just making things much, much worse.
Here's why it matters. Secrets have to be outed. Not for gospel. Not for revenge.
But when you bury the what, competence, power, identity, whatever.
You bury the ability to fix it. The Kennedy files, I'm guessing, not about him. They're not about Oswald.
They're about us. If we can stare down 1963, we can then demand 2024's truth as well. The what they've protected has kept us blind! Tomorrow, maybe we see!
And when we do, we don't just read it. We rebuild!
That's what's at stake today.
RADIO
March 17, 2025
Can Trump Void Biden’s Autopen Pardons?
President Trump is now insisting that the preemptive pardons that President Biden issued in his last days in office - like those given to Hunter Biden, Dr. Fauci, and members of the January 6 Committee, should be null and void. Trump argued that if they were signed using an autopen, without Biden’s knowledge, a court should disqualify them. But will this happen? How prevalent was Biden’s use of an autopen? Did he even know he signed many of these documents? Glenn, Pat, and Jason discuss. The guys also review Conor McGregor’s recent appearance at the White House and a terrifying story out of Mexico.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: There's a couple of really disturbing things. We will start getting into them tomorrow. So working towards tomorrow's show. We will spend a lot of time on the auto-pen thing. That thing is a mess. I mean, the president didn't -- I mean, we have the audio. Let's see if we can get that for tomorrow.
We have the audio with the President. And who was it? With Tapper? And he's like, I didn't do that. Yes, you did, sir. You just signed a bill two days ago.
No, I didn't.
Yes, you did.
Oh, well, I guess I did. That shows he was either absolutely incompetent, which is very, very vile.
And/or somebody else is just using the auto-pen, and he didn't know what he was signing.
That is -- I mean, everyone involved in that, should, quite honestly, be tried for treason.
You are -- you are a traitor to the Constitution of the United States.
You are taking on the power of the presidency, yourself.
You don't have the right to do it.
And I don't think Kamala Harris wasn't the, you one doing it.
It wasn't like it was in the chain of command.
Do we have any idea who was doing it. Susan rice comes to mind.
Ron Klain comes to mind. Right? Who else?
VOICE: Neera Tanden. So she was the center for America Progress president. She came in as an adviser. I think she's an OMB, I think, Stu, for a while.
I think she took -- yeah. Then she was -- she took Susan Rice's position, as the head of interior policy or something like that, after Susan Rice left.
All these were Obama people, that we were like, why in the hell are some of these people getting so close to the president, and sticking with him, that were from the Obama administration.
GLENN: Because, I mean, the reason they were all sticking with, is because they held the power. They held the power.
I'm convinced of it. Where does the auto-pen live, do we know? Is that out of his desk kind of like a printer?
JASON: I don't know.
GLENN: Honestly, where is that? That should be under lock and key. But who has access to that? Because that's important.
It the secretary of the president need to give people permission.
That has to be chain of command for the auto-pen.
JASON: We should be looking now specifically for that question.
Heritage foundation did a deeper dive on it.
They found, the president was on vacation golfing, while some of these pardons are being signed.
GLENN: Which president.
JASON: Biden.
GLENN: Wait.
He was golfing?
What? Did he have an auto club that just like hit the ball for him?
He could swing a golf club? No way. I'm having a hard time believing that. There's no way. I just see a ball on a tee just kind of falling -- yes. On his first hole, he only had 1,747 strokes. And an actual stroke or two. But that's a different story.
JASON: We should look more into that. There's probably an auto walkup to the stairs of Air Force One. Let's open this investigation even more.
STU: Well, then they did auto president, kind of --
GLENN: This is bad. This is really bad.
JASON: Yeah.
STU: And I guess it's been used since the Bush administration.
GLENN: No, I think it was used. First order to be signed was Barack Obama had to sign a big order. And he was on I think vacation.
STU: That's legislation. That was the first legislation.
I think it went all the way back to 2005, I believe, during Bush.
And the Department of Justice issued a -- an okay, basically to use it.
But it's never been challenged in the Supreme Court.
GLENN: I think it should be.
STU: Kind of odd.
You kind of have to. I don't know, maybe actually sign the bills.
GLENN: Well, I wouldn't have a problem with an auto-pen in a way that, it needs to get to the president.
Has to have his signature. If it was like the nuclear football.
You know what I mean?
Where it's with the president at all times. And it could feed go B something.
And improve it.
Why not have him sign it?
GLENN: I think we may not -- back in 2004, 2008, we may not have realized what they would use this for.
Because we used to think people had some integrity. But obviously not.
I mean, this is really, really bad.
Again, where is Pam Bondi?
SPENCER: If you're thinking about it though, if you're a second term president, that wants a third term. But you just want to be the guy behind the guy in the shadows. The auto-pen is the perfect thing for you. You have a puppet like Joe in there.
STU: Trump did use it a few times as well.
GLENN: I'm not saying it's bad.
STU: I'm not saying -- it should be challenged. And like, look, the proper way to do this. Is to send the documents to him. And let him sign it in person. And not send a signature across the -- like some machine that replicates his signature back in Washington, while he's on vacation.
GLENN: And I don't know if you know this, but we're past the age of the fax machine. And even the fax machine would have been okay.
STU: Yeah.
GLENN: You know what I mean?
Fax it to me, and I'll sign it. The signature is the important part of that.
JASON: Well, this is going to be a huge conversation. Because President Trump this morning was tweeting out that a lot of pardons were giving J6 committee people, those preemptive pardons. He's now saying, those should be null and void. And there's nothing in the Constitution, that even comes close to addressing this.
GLENN: Come on. I've never seen a president doing that many pardons. How did that system work, you know what I mean? Six thousand.
JASON: That's a lot of batteries on the auto-pen.
GLENN: And a lot of batteries on the president, just to understand 6,000 names and cases. So we will get into that tomorrow.
Also, what's his -- what's-his-face was with Donald Trump this morning.
STU: Connor McGregor. Yeah, yeah. Do we have a clip of that.
Go ahead and play this.
VOICE: It's a travesty. Our government with zero action and zero accountability. You know, our money is being spent on overseas issues that has nothing to do with the Irish people. It's overrunning, running ravage on the culture. There are rural (inaudible), that have become a minority in one swoop. So issues need to be addressed. And Americans, as I understand, need to hear this. Because if not, there will be no place to come on and visit.
GLENN: What a clever way to get him into the White House on St. Patrick's Day.
I mean, I think this guy is -- I mean, I don't know about him personally. I just know that he wants to run, I think for Prime Minister.
STU: President.
GLENN: For president in Ireland. And Ireland is in trouble. I mean, they all are. They're in trouble.
Ireland, you know, it's not the sweet little -- I mean, first of all, it's now the home of Rosie O'Donnell. It's not the sweet little place it used to be. But, Rosie, I don't know -- you should peek outside your window from time to time. The Islamic Brotherhood are setting up shop there. And I don't think they like gay people. They like them even less than the people you think hate them here.
STU: I can personally guarantee you, though, wherever Rosie O'Donnell is living. These problems probably don't exist. It's probably very beautiful and lots of grass and hills. That's probably where she is.
GLENN: Ireland is in deep trouble. I mean, they're losing their churches. They're just being made into mosques all over. And I'm telling you, I think -- I think by 2030, you could see Great Britain become an Islamic state.
SPENCER: Yeah. To your point, Stu. That's a really good point. Connor McGregor is an shutdowns on Netflix or something. I can't remember. But it shows his entire background. He's talking about rural communities and like harder communities are being affected by this. That's where he comes from. Like, he was their champion. Like he grew up very tough streets. Worked his way up. Like a lot of solid blue collar neighborhoods.
GLENN: Deep State will do everything. Do everything they can to kill that guy. Not ours, theirs.
JASON: Oh, gosh.
GLENN: Liz Truss said to me, the interview I did with her, coming out next week, we talked about, where are these people, that could be like a Donald Trump for all these countries. And she said, they're coming. They're coming. And I think he's one of them. That will be very good.
JASON: I do too. Absolutely. Did you ask Liz about the annoying use of vowels within their language? Because that's what I want to know.
GLENN: No, if you look at -- it's so funny you would say that.
If you watch the video, I tried right at the beginning. I couldn't get it in. She just kept going.
You know, you have U's in words that shouldn't have U's. Like there's no U in colour. Anyway.
I don't know if she would have thought that was funny. She would be accused by you Americans. I have a feeling.
There's another story that I want to get on to tomorrow. That I couldn't believe.
I spent a couple of hours just trying to verify this. And reading all the stories from the Washington Post. And from the New York Times and everything else. So it's not some sort of crazy conspiracy theory. Because it's everywhere.
And it's about these concentration camps in Mexico.
Did you hear about this? Did you hear about this, Stu? This should be on everyone's front page.
This should be a very big thing.
You know, we've been saying all the time. People just go down, they disappear in Mexico. Where did they go? Well, outside of the town of Guadalajara, they have found this abandoned torture camp, with underground crematories, underground ovens.
Okay? They're finding teeth and bones.
And they found remnants of at least 700 people. And what they were doing was kidnapping people. Kidnapping their families. And then saying, you're going to do work for us. Or we're going to kill your whole family.
And they would torture these people. And torture the families.
And then just burn the bows.
And some of it was apparently was done to just -- not to recruit new people. Just to learn how to torture people.
I mean, I'm a telling you, I don't know how we don't send in the Special Forces, pretty soon.
JASON: They're talking about the cartels doing this?
GLENN: Yeah. Well, also in the -- what is it? The Cente Muarte (phonetic).
JASON: The Cente Muarte.
GLENN: What is that? A religion, a gang?
JASON: Yeah. It's kind of like an offshoot of Christianity. Something like that. My wife --
GLENN: Meaning that Christianity believes in Satan?
JASON: It's hard. Yeah. It's really hard. I know they have witches and things like that. That can cast spells. And all that.
You can walk through Mexico City. Like a really public square. That looks really normal.
You've been to Mexico City. And then all of a sudden, you'll see, one of their statues, it's like a woman, but a skeleton. She's a grim reaper outfit.
GLENN: That's a symbol of it.
JASON: They'll come up to it, and pray to it. And it's very formal.
GLENN: Is it a twisted offshoot of -- it seemed. As I was reading about it this weekend. Is this something like the Lady of Guadalupe gone wrong?
What is this?
GLENN: Don't quote me. Somebody will be listening and smacking me in the head.
It seemed like a saint that looks after bad people, or something like that.
So cartels are heavily in that. They've gone way off the deepened.
This is not surprising that this is happening. Have you ever seen narcos Mexico on Netflix?
GLENN: No.
JASON: So you watch through that, and it's based on real events, and things that happened, as the cartel spread through Mexico.
They'll just kind of randomly throw in the attorney general is on board, or getting paid off by some of these cartels.
GLENN: Oh, Donald Trump is not going to -- the people of Mexico.
If we go in with Special Forces. And we kill all these groups. People in Mexico, are going to love Americans.
They are going to love them.
Because nothing will happen. Because all of their -- you know, all of the -- you can't get elected. Unless you either just turn a blind eye, or with the cartels. You can't. They kill you.
And they kill everybody around you. And everybody who wants to replace you.
So, I mean, you know, it's got to stop! It's got to end.
JASON: I don't know how you separate the Mexican government. Dirty Mexican officials that are on the take, and part of this whole thing.
We did a story probably last year. There was like a general signed to crack down on this one cartel in one region. They found out a couple months later that he's on the take and getting paid off.
GLENN: I have to tell you, I think Mexico is a drug state. I don't think it's a failed state.
I think it's a drug state at this point.
RADIO
March 17, 2025
EXCLUSIVE: Why Was Pelosi’s "Fixer" at Jan. 6?
Blaze News’ Steve Baker exposes Aaron Black, who he has dubbed “Pelosi’s precious,” for allegedly lying about his role at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Did Black, known to associates as Nancy Pelosi’s “fixer,” orchestrate agitators at the riot and skew the narrative to benefit Democrats? And did he lie about his presence at the Capitol during the riot? Baker joins Glenn Beck to break down the findings recorded in a Blaze News exclusive report, including Black’s history of fomenting unrest using CIA-style color revolution tactics and his deep connections to Pelosi.
Read the full article HERE: https://www.theblaze.com/news/pelosis...
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Steve Baker, investigative journalist, Blaze news. Opinion contributor. And a guy who almost went to jail for just covering January 6. Welcome, Steve. How are you?
STEVE: It's good to be back.
GLENN: How is it to have that monkey off your back?
STEVE: Well, I didn't realize how heavy of a burden that was.
GLENN: That's crazy.
STEVE: Because I lived with that for over three years.
Then even after the arrest, I didn't realize the stress levels that I was living under, until as it began to slowly lift over -- took about a week, before I felt normal again. I just didn't know it was there.
GLENN: It's weird. I go to my doctor all the time. My wife usually will come with me. It's fine.
And she'll say, she'll look at him and go, no. It's not. No, it's not.
But you live under it for so long. And until you get away from it, you have no idea. I can't imagine what that stress was.
Let's switch subjects. You have a new Blaze exclusive out.
Nancy Pelosi had a fixer at the Capitol on January 6th.
This is -- this will just piss you off. But it pissed me off for a couple of reasons. One, it is so evil!
But the second thing is, is I looked for these people during Occupy Wall Street.
STEVE: Right.
GLENN: We were looking for -- and this guy never came up on our radar as connected to anything.
And now, in retrospect, you're showing how connected he is.
And it's all this -- it's all this USAID kind of crap.
STEVE: Right.
GLENN: Who is he? And what did he do?
STEVE: Well, first of all, he was one of the principle organizers of Occupy Wall Street, which is amazing that he doesn't come up.
Now, we can go back in retrospect. And we can find him.
We can find YouTube videos of him speaking and doing --
GLENN: I'm sure we covered it.
We had no idea who he was.
STEVE: No idea who he was.
And fortunately, for us, you have a connection, which we can't get really deep into.
But you were on this, you know, back -- before Occupy Wall Street.
GLENN: Uh-huh.
STEVE: You were on this story, fifteen, 17 years ago back at Fox.
And it was because of that connection, that someone came to me, because he's a fan of yours.
GLENN: And I didn't even know -- by the way, I hopefully will talk to somebody at this point.
You're not going to believe. You're not going to believe this. You came to me a couple weeks ago. I have a story coming out. I want you to know.
Shut up. It's an amazing whistle-blower. Thank you for everything you have done in the past. And thank you for this.
STEVE: Right. And as a result to that. He came forward, and he said, well, let me just reset the stage just a little bit here. When Joe Hahnemann and I were assigned to do the first stories on the assassination attempt on July 13th, at Butler, PA. Well, when we revealed in that story that Thomas Crooks, the shooter. Our sources said, you know, they're in an Intelligence Community, and Special Ops. They're all saying, now, this kid was groomed.
We recognize our handiwork. This is what we do overseas.
So suddenly, I get this call. Or private message from a guy. You know, great story, by the way.
I really appreciate it. By the way, I think you got it right.
Thank you for telling me that. Who are you?
Then he started revealing who he was. And then I started vetting, and finding out who he was.
And what he said to me was, yeah. I recognize my handiwork in Thomas Crook.
And so we started the process of sharing things, developing a relationship. And then one day, as our relationship was growing, he says, oh, by the way. I have a couple of names to give you. If you really want to know what happened in January 6th. And one of those names is Aaron Black.
GLENN: This is the story. Exclusive story on the Blaze.com right now.
The Nancy Pelosi had a fixer, at the Capitol on January 6th.
That's what you search for. That's what's there now, at the Blaze.com. Go ahead. Tell the story.
STEVE: So what ended up happening was, is I started doing what you're supposed to do. I started looking at it. The more I did, the more interesting it got.
The more research it did, the more people he had to bring in. Because this guy is dark. And we had to go and actually scrape the dark web for him.
He's good at cleaning out his trail. The one thing that he couldn't clean out was that there were some Project Veritas videos out there from 2016. Where he was caught in one of their stings. Actually admitting to the fact that he and his guys were responsible for the violence at a Donald Trump rally in 2016. March, I think it was.
Early in the campaign. In which they had actually cancelled the rally. Because not only was there violence outside. They had over 100 of their people infiltrated inside, in a project they called bird docking. Which is they get old ladies there, early in the morning, 6 o'clock, 7 o'clock in the morning to get in line first with their posters. And, you know, their placards inside their bags.
And then they'll get up either on the stage or front row, they will open those anti-Trump posters of things, and then get the men, the MAGA guys irritated and hopefully violent. That's what it's called. It's called bird dogging. And so this is what this guy has been an expert at that.
Creating these types of situations throughout his entire career. From Occupy Wall Street. All of a sudden, he shows up on the radar again, in 2016.
And a couple of very specific events. Then he goes silent again.
Then all of a sudden, he remarriages as, quote, unquote, senior political adviser at team Pelosi.
GLENN: So -- I just want you to -- get your arms around this here for a second.
What this guy is doing, is what we showed you our State Department, through USAID was doing all over South America and Europe. We told you. I did a chalkboard on this, just I don't even know. Just six years ago. We'll have to look at it. This chalkboard laid this all out. And showed how this money was being used. And how Barack Obama started with the Arab spring to teach how to overthrow governments. And then they started. They kept doing it all across Libya. And then Syria. And then we went into Ukraine. And elsewhere.
We went into South America. This is what they were perfecting. These Colour Revolutions.
STEVE: Right.
GLENN: Paid for by your tax dollars. And I told you about five or six years ago, I think they're doing this to America. I think that's what's happening here. Well, yes. This is the guy.
STEVE: Exactly.
GLENN: Exactly.
STEVE: He, among others, he's not the lone wolf out there. But I actually tweeted out. And it just dawned on me this morning.
Because we have this photo at the top of the article on TheBlaze. If you go look and Nancy Pelosi is cradling his face in her hands. And just giving him the most adoring. So I'm now calling him Pelosi's precious. I changed his name.
GLENN: Yeah. He is. He is.
Okay. So what did he do at January 6th?
STEVE: Well, what we believe through our contacts, sources, whistle-blowers. Both named and unnamed.
Is that he did, in fact, organize, this is what we've been told. Is that he had paid agitators. I didn't say violent people. Paid agitators, because his expertise is controlling the narrative.
Like, you know, confederate flags being carried through the Capitol rotunda, things of that nature. Now, the most interesting aspect of January 6th.
I think everybody focuses on the violence. They pick their sides. The police started it.
The Proud Boys started it. Pick your -- you know, your nefarious actors. The most interesting aspect of January 6th was the same organizers of the rally got it delivered that day. Also organized the Jericho march on December 12th, just a month earlier.
And then also organized the million MAGA March on November 12th.
Now, when I said organizing, they pulled the permits for the stages and the speakers. And the people that part of those -- that weekend activities.
But all of those events, this was extreme violence.
Antifa. BLM.
You know, Proud Boys, knocking heads. They were -- Antifa was attacking old ladies. You know, elderly couples going back to their cars, after attending the rallies.
On the December 12th rally, a Proud Boy was critically injured. He was stabbed by an Antifa guy.
Then suddenly on January 6th, the largest event of them all, by multiples larger, zero counter-protestors.
GLENN: And that was at the ellipse, right?
STEVE: Anywhere. Anywhere.
GLENN: Anywhere.
STEVE: You saw no counter-protestors anywhere.
GLENN: I was going to say, that was weird.
I was thinking. Well, no. They were there at the Capitol.
Those are the ones I deemed not part of the movement.
That I've looked at it, and said, there's no way that person was part of the movement. They were acting like they were part of the movement.
STEVE: That's correct. This is what his expertise is. It's controlling the narrative. And what did Nancy Pelosi most famously say, when she set up the committee?
She said, that this was to establish and preserve the narrative of that day!
GLENN: And preserve the narrative.
STEVE: That's an exact quote.
GLENN: So what was the narrative?
Did he help design it? Did he help execute it? What was his role on January 6th?
STEVE: Both. He's a boots on the ground kind of guy.
One of our main sources in the article, Dustin Stockton, who has had a 15-year relationship with him, going back to Occupy Wall Street days. Countermovement to the Tea Party movement at the time.
And so as a result of those two things, there was a lot of collusion between Stockton and black during that time.
Over the years. All the way up until and through January 6th.
And so one of the things that we learned was, is that Stockton had been told by Aaron Black, that he was out of town January 6th. Until Stockton saw a photo of him on the steps of the Capitol that day.
And then, additionally, because he was very, very worried, that he had been seen. He started reaching out to other people, within our network, and security people.
And asking them about -- he was very concerned about whether his comes had been caught in the geofence that day.
Became very, very concerned about that.
And these are stories that are coming to us, through sources, that you can't even believe.
We're talking about the Rolling Stone. Politico. Other places.
GLENN: I want to -- I want to ask you. Let me take a quick break.
And when we come back.
I just want to know, I'm really excited what Trump has been doing.
I'm very -- very, very excited what's happening. I'm a little underwhelmed.
And I just said to Stu, put this on your calendar, a year from now, if we're not seeing things.
Then this is not strategy. I think it's strategy so far. But I've been underwhelmed what's happening at the FBI and DOJ. Because that's critical to the rot that's in there. And undoing the damage of the Deep State. And I've not seen any moves on it yet. Let me get your opinion on that when we come back.
So, Steve, this is just part one of a series of articles that you're going to be doing.
Now, in my world, this guy would be called in by the FBI.
And they would start questioning him. You know, what are you doing?
What happened?
We haven't found even the pipe bomber yet.
That's a little odd.
Are we -- are you disappointed at all, in Pam Bondi ask what the FBI is doing?
Do you think this is strategy. Incompetence. Are they no different than the rest of them? What's happening there?
SPENCER: Glenn, we revealed a year and a half ago irrefutable proof, that two federal officers perjured themselves in federal court.
And nothing has ever happened about that either.
GLENN: Yeah. But we had -- I only count from Pam Bondi getting in. You know what I mean?
STEVE: Right. Right.
GLENN: There should have been things.
Everybody else. Every single office that has been occupied. They had a list.
And they went boom, boom, boom, she should have had that list.
Does it exist. Is there a reason for this hesitation?
STEVE: Yeah. We've seen other department heads or ministers that are steamrolling through their list right now.
We're not seeing that there. I don't understand it.
I will tell you this, they're connected to what we're working on. To the stories we're working on, related to January 6th right now.
Whether we're going back to those federal officers who perjured themselves. Or we're talking about Aaron black and this revelation here. Someone who needs to be investigated. I can tell you right now, with all confidence that the blockade is coming from the G.O.P.
GLENN: Why?
STEVE: There are -- people in leadership, in the G.O.P. right now, who are stopping, and have been the object obstructionists since take one.
Since the first committee.
Since Loudermilk's subcommittee was working at the oversight committee, the work he was doing.
There were obstructionists at the top, who were stopping him and blockading him. Is now there's a new committee, has been founded. Been formed.
Are being formed. Has been announced an actual press release went out from the speaker. And now they're narrowing the focus of what they're even allowed to do, down to the point of, what's the point?
And so there are some problems there.
GLENN: So do you have the names? I know you won't give them to me on the air. Will you give me the names?
I'll --
STEVE: I'll talk to you about it off the air.
GLENN: Yeah. Please do.
STEVE: The problem is. Let's just be perfectly honest. The establishment G.O.P. did not want Trump in 2020.
GLENN: I don't want the names.
STEVE: They participated in the election. Let me say that.
GLENN: I am -- I am just sitting here thinking, what are the legal ramifications of me doing that?
What are the ramifications?
Then I thought of you listening wherever you are.
Thinking, what are the ramifications, if we don't get those names. Give me the names.
I'll expose it.
STEVE: We will get there.
GLENN: Good. Good. Thank you so much. Do you know if you have a next piece dropping on this?
STEVE: I actually have to spend a couple more days here in Dallas. Then I have to hit the road and talk to the people for the next installment.
GLENN: On the shooting of the president, is anything going to happen on that?
STEVE: Again, we're going back to the same office, aren't we? Where, you're asking the same question to the same office. What's happening at DOJ? What's happening at FBI? Now, today is Dan Bongino's first day, maybe he unplugs the clock. I don't know.
GLENN: I can't believe Kash Patel is part of that clock.
I just can't. I can see him being told, back off. Back off. Back off.
I mean, can't see him being part of the clock. And I couldn't see Bongino doing that. Now, I don't know pam Bondi at all, but there is a clog there. And it's got to be unclogged. And I'll tell you, this is the Achilles' heel of the president. He may not know it. Most people may not know it.
This will be the Achilles' heel to his supporters.
If you don't go after even your own kind, to clean this out, I really think Americans, even had you seen own supporters will go, you know. Mr. President, I'm a supporter of yours on many, many things.
But that one is too important. And if you don't get that one done, I don't know where I stand.
STEVE: Right. Exactly.
GLENN: Appreciative of what you are doing.
But I can't count you as the revolutionary that I thought was going to fix our republic. That has to be done.
Thank you so much. Appreciate it. All right.