Glenn looks back at President Reagan: his race to the White House, his most impactful moments and speeches as president, and the assassination attempt that almost claimed his life.
Denise Warriner is on a mission to find justice for her sister’s awful, 2020 death. Recently released CCTV footage shows 43-year-old Stephanie Warriner sitting in a wheelchair in a Canadian hospital. Warriner, who suffered from COPD, lowered her COVID mask because she was struggling to breathe. A horrific confrontation then occurred between Warriner and several hospital security guards. The men then move her seemingly lifeless body to another area of the hospital. She died two weeks later.
Denise, who for THREE YEARS has been urging Canadian officials to try those responsible for her sister’s passing, joins Glenn to detail her efforts and the lack of action from Canada she’s seen as a result. Plus, she explains how YOU can get involved…
Prior to Denise's on-air interview, Glenn's producercontacted Ontario Premier Doug Ford, Ontario Attorney General Doug Downey, and University Health Network CEO Dr. Kevin Smith. They inquired what was being done regarding Stephanie's death, including the security guard who dragged Stephanie down the hospital hallway, and the security guard who altered the security cameras to avoid capturing the confrontation. Their responses were disappointing, to say the least.
Premier Ford's office did not respond.
The University Health Network, the hospital chain where Stephanie's death occurred, responded, "UHN will not comment on a court's decision nor on matters of individual employment or discipline." The response indicates that the hospital network won't do anything proactive regarding the staff responsible for Stephanie's death.
Email correspondance between Atorney General Doug Downey's office and Glenn's producerCourtesy of "The Blaze"
The office of Ontario's Atorney General, Doug Downey essentially "wiped their hands" of any responsibility regarding Stephanie's death:
Email correspondance between Atorney General Doug Downey's office and Glenn's producer
As Glenn said, the response is simply from a "weasel" who wants to avert any responsibility from his office.
Though these offices attempt to divert responsibility, Glenn puts it simply: Stephanie Warriner was "killed for improper mask wear..." in a hospital, where she should have received treatment for her underlying condition. Instead, she was pinned against the wall, dragged through the hallway, and died due to lack of treatment. Why? Because she removed her mask due to trouble breathing.
We have to hold these parties responsible.
The far-left ruins nearly everything is touches. Thankfully, as proven in a recently released statement from M&Ms, large corporations are beginning to learn that consumers are tired of their woke policies. But there’s still one, major component of society that’s at risk of succumbing to the far-left’s cold, evil touch: Comedy. In this clip, Glenn explains how the left is RUINING comedy because it makes you happy and they HATE that you can enjoy life with them…
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: I want to talk to you a little bit about the loss of meaning. This is one reason, I just when we such high suicidal rates now. Is because nothing is true. Nothing means anything.
And the things that are given meaning, are ridiculous. Okay?
Like, for instance, race. It's ridiculous. Why are we arguing about race?
Race doesn't make a difference. Nothing. Nothing.
It's the -- the merit inside of each of us. It is what you do with your life.
Everything that is given power today, is meaningless. And it's all part of that woke culture.
Last year, and I can't -- I can't take this. And I'm going to be going to address this once. Last year, the M&M spokescandies. There's no such thing as a spokes candy.
Got a refreshed look to reflect today's society. I don't know about you.
But as I'm getting ready to watch a movie, and I see the M&M guys strapped to that rocket, about to go off, all I'm thinking is, can we stop with this stupid commercial?
I've got my box of M&Ms. I want to watch the movie. I don't ever really fear for their life. But maybe that's me. Yesterday, the M&M brand continues, quote, to evolve, to reflect a more dynamic progressive world, that we live in.
Now, our lives were destroyed by, you know, the women -- you know, the womanly green M&M. And our life has been made much richer, when she became nonbinary. I don't know about you. Yesterday, the M&M Mars company made a statement announcing an indefinite pause on their spokes candies. Because they realize that even a candied shoe can be polarizing. Which is the last thing that M&Ms wanted, because they were just trying to bring people together. Really?
So their new spokesperson is Maya Rudolph, who spent three years on Saturday Night Live. You can find her funny or not find her funny. You know, whatever. The company says, they chose her, because they want to make things fun again. And she's still inclusive. Really?
Because here's the problem. You could have Jesus. But the minute Jesus comes down and your candy company says, say these lines, and they're woke lines, you know, a lot of people will be turned off by that. So you really stopped being inclusive. Name one figure that is inclusive right now, that's not polarizing to at least half the country.
The reason why, because you have to play the game. If you're going to work for these companies, you have to have the right words, acronyms, slogans, you know, race.
This is inherently noninclusive. But I digress. So they're making this statement. And what a surprise. Right before the Super Bowl. And companies are learning, go woke. Go broke.
We're tired of companies trying to do more, than what we're asking them to do. When it comes to M&Ms. Here's what I want you to do: Make a yummy chocolate candy.
I don't even care if it melts in my hand. Because I got past that lie of yours, when I was seven. They do melt in my hand.
But they're yummy. You and your stupid spokes candy make no difference in my life, or the life of anyone in the world.
Your candy might. But the spokes candy doesn't.
No one ever, anywhere, in all of time, will say, you know, I was a once a little girl who thought I couldn't make it. But then that candy company put their yellow M&M, in comfortable sling back shoes, instead of the go-go boots. And I realized, I can do it. I am important.
It's not going to happen.
Now, go woke, go broke. Also applies to comedy.
The new woke Velma, people are surprised this is a disaster. I didn't even have to watch it. I could have told you, it was a disaster.
This is the HBO Scooby-Doo spin-off, which do not even include Scooby-Doo. Shaggy has been replaced by a black man named Norville. Fred is the only white character. So he's evil. He's a privileged misogynist. Who can't dress or feed himself.
Velma is a black Asian. And Daphne is half Asian and half white. And they're both bisexual. Obviously, there's more than one lesbian kissing scene.
Another scene features teenage boys kissing. And there's plenty examples of doinks. Sexualizing children.
So what happens when you let woke bullies take control of what should be considered funny?
See, they do what they always do. They don't write comedy. Because they don't believe comedy is funny.
They believe comedy -- you're not supposed to laugh. You're supposed to clap angrily. Yes! Finally!
They're making out. Yes. That's what their comedy is.
Now, I'm not against satire. Laughter is the test of truth. A joke is playful judgment.
It conceals the ugliness of the world. And it uncovers the ugliness of the world.
And leftists. Boy, they are not a group winning many beauty contests lately.
This is literally the subplot of one of the Velma episodes. Now, weird thing is that even the left, doesn't like the Velma show.
They don't like it. They got making out lesbians, and the white guys -- they don't like it. The telegraph called it the most hated TV series on TV.
It has four episodes out. Velma is already -- already the worst rated TV show in IMDB history. Its audience score is six.
But as always, the left isn't taking responsibility for their bad behavior. A review in Forbes said that Velma is so bad, in fact, that it's spawning conspiracy theories, that creator Mindy Kaling, made what is essentially a parody of what the right-wing thinks left comedy is really like.
What? What a stupid plan that would be. It's a common tactic, if a woke comedy fails, which it always does. They blame us. Conspiracy theorist.
The left loves to whine about the dangers of right-wing humor. I don't know if you saw this. But the European Union just released an 18-page report. The European Union. That's a government body, by the way.
An 18-page report, on how right-wing comedy is a weapon.
Now, if a conservative, or a comedian just accidentally stumbles on a conservative joke, even by accident. Wait a minute. I didn't mean that.
No. I voted for Obama.
The left immediately destroys that person. And that joke, he meant that literally. He meant that.
When -- when he was drawing Yosemite Sam, and he was shooting. He meant that all people are like Yosemite Sam, and they should kill all people that are not like Yosemite Sam. What are you talking about?
The gist of their right-wing comedy argument is conservatives shouldn't be allowed to make jokes.
Because their humor is actually a complex. And when they say complex, they mean a mental illness. Literally, it's a mental illness.
And all they're doing is calling for violence. Ironically, a Pew study from 2020 proves kind of the opposite. I'm quoting.
White liberals disproportionately suffer from mental illness. Let me tell you, it's not even a competition. Masks? That has become a mental illness. There is -- there is no reason to wear a mask. That -- that fraud has been exposed long ago. Why are you still wearing a mask?
You have a mental illness at this point. They claim that conservatism is incompatible with political humor. And that liberalism suits it quite nicely. They say conservatism supports institutions. Which is ridiculous. Because at this point, the leftists are the institutions.
You know, they're at a drunk, at a karaoke bar. I can sing.
I'm so much better than you can sing.
I mean, they think they are capable of humor, because as the author about the book of right-wing comedy wrote, liberals are inherently free thinking. So here's what all of this is really all about.
Liberals don't like the fact that you can laugh. You know, what they hated about Ronald Reagan the most? He was happy.
He was funny. He was normal. They hated that.
Hated that. He makes jokes.
Oh, my gosh. They hate -- you can have fun, without them. That you can be successful, without them.
They hate what makes you happy. They hate what gives you meaning in life.
They hate what would give them meaning in life.
They really hate that we can laugh about ourselves.
They don't do a lot of laughing. I don't know if you've known that. I don't think I've seen many of them really laugh. I've seen them, ha, ha, ha, that's right. You stick it to them. I have seen that a lot.
Lorne Michaels, the creator of Saturday Night Live. He said in an interview, the reason why SNL tends to roast conservatives more than liberals, is, quote Republicans are easier than Democrats.
Democrats tend to take it personally. Republicans think it's funny.
There is nothing funnier, to me, than someone wrecking me.
You'll hear that a lot on the show. I pay these guys a lot of money. If it bothered me, it would stop, would it not stop, Stu?
STU: Oh, yeah. I built my career, on making fun of you.
GLENN: Exactly right. And who encourages it more than anybody else?
STU: You do.
GLENN: Exactly right. If you can't laugh at yourself, then what -- who are you?
Who do you think you are? The M&M Mars company?
With their dopey spokes candy? That's important.
That's really important. You know, so we're going to give them a message of hope and inspiration and fun.
See, conservatives think that their sincerity on their spokes candy, is funny.
They don't get the joke
The true reason why Pope Benedict retired from his position in 2013 — the first time it had been done in nearly 600 years — remains a mystery (though, the fact that Vatican City’s ATM transactions began working again right after his announcement leaves many to believe he was pressured into the decision). But now, an Archbishop who worked closely with Benedict is publishing a tell-all book that may expose several of Vatican City’s scandals, ones the Pope was investigating. Dr. Taylor Marshall, author of ‘Infiltration,’ joins Glenn to detail not only these dark secrets, but also how they represent a type of evil that is NOT exclusive to the Catholic Church. Rather, Dr. Marshall explains how this story relates to us ALL: ‘Ultimately, evil wants to take ownership and brand your mind and control your thoughts. And that's where all the tentacles are reaching.’
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Dr. Taylor Marshall is with us now.
The author of Infiltration.
The infiltration of the Catholic Church. The plot to destroy the church from within.
This is a universal story now. Doctor, welcome to the program. How are you?
TAYLOR: I'm great. Thanks for having me on, Glenn.
GLENN: You bet. So we follow your work a great deal because you talk about other things, other than Catholic things.
But I want to make sure people understand, right from the beginning.
We are not taking on the Catholic Church, and this is not a Catholic bash session.
TAYLOR: No. Not at all. And I consider myself a Catholic. I attend mass every day, sometimes more. I have a beautiful Catholic family. We have eight children.
TAYLOR: And I love Christ. I love -- I love the church.
And that -- that bothers me, that there's these wolves in sheep's clothing. In shepherd's clothing even, doing horrible things to children, to bank finances, to all kinds of scandals.
TAYLOR: And I think the answer is to just shine light on it, and expose it. So we can have true change. And get things back on track, the way we want them.
GLENN: And there will be a lot of Catholics that listen and will hear you, like Nancy Pelosi, who consider themselves Catholic. That will disagree, strongly with with some of the things that you're saying. But I think that's the point.
Because there is this kind of feeling among Catholics about Pope Francis. Is he a good guy? Is he a bad guy?
I don't know if we'll ever get to that question. But I want to talk about Pope Benedict. Because this was very bizarre, when Pope Benedict resigned.
I think it was the first time, right?
Where he resigned.
TAYLOR: Well, it's the first time in 597 years. So it's been a while. It's pretty rare.
GLENN: Yeah. Right.
And when he resigned, it seemed very odd. It was preceded by European banks, pulling the plug on the Vatican bank. Right?
TAYLOR: Yeah. That's correct. Well, actually if we go back a little bit more. A few months before the Vatican bank having a -- kind of a meltdown.
There was the butler of Pope Benedict. His name was Paulo HEP Gabrielli, and he was leaking documents to the press and to journalists. And no one knew how this was happening. And finally, he was caught.
He pled guilty. And he was sentenced to prison, in the Vatican. And Pope Benedict oddly pardoned him. And that led to the whole investigation, that was headed up by Benedict. A secret investigation. Three cardinals did it. They presented to him. The sources say one or two red binders, of all kinds of filth in it.
Bank scandals. There's rumored to be pictures of cardinals in drag, in those binders. All kinds of nasty things.
GLENN: Oh, my gosh.
TAYLOR: And that all happened in December of 2012.
And then January 1st of '13, the -- the Vatican museums cannot process money.
The ATM machines in Vatican City stopped working.
And shortly thereafter, we have the announcement of Pope Benedict, that he's going to resign. The very next day, all those banking problems were fixed. They were resolved. By the way, the night that Pope Benedict announced he was going to resign. That was the night that (?) which was a sign for a lot of people.
GLENN: So -- so this is right along the lines of what we're seeing in the Deep State in the United States.
We are seeing with World Economic Forum, which I know you are very well aware of.
Are you -- are you -- is there any evidence, that this banking thing was to put pressure on the pope, get out?
TAYLOR: I think so. And the reason for this. And you say Deep State. And I think we really need to. Everyone needs to put in their vote. (?) deep church. The same thing that is happening in state, is happening in the church. We can refer to Deep State and deep church.
GLENN: And it's not just the Catholic Church. These people have been working behind the scenes for years.
TAYLOR: Yes. And you have to remember that the Vatican is unique, in that the Vatican is its own nation. It's called a city state. It has its own sovereignty. Technical, Vatican (?) it's it's own micro country. And as its own micro country, it has its own bank. Now, I want (?) a mob boss. Your biggest problem, is what do you do with all this money?
GLENN: Is the bank.
TAYLOR: You have to launder. You have to get it into legit means and move it around, right?
And what if there were a bank on earth, that belonged to a micro nation, that was not regulated by the EU. That was not regulated or audited by anyone on the outside.
Well, there is that bank in the world. And that bank is called the Vatican bank. So err crony on earth wants a piece of that bank.
Because you can legitimatize legitimate money. That's why the Vatican (?) almost every five to ten years. Since the 1960s.
The temptation to use that Vatican bank is high. And the temptation for corrupt cardinals in the church, that led people to get their fingers in the pie. Is also very high. That's only one piece of this puzzle. But I think that helps people to understand why the Vatican bank is constantly plagued with scandals.
GLENN: Okay. So let me make sure I understand the good guy here. Benedict. Is it your thesis that Benedict was working to end all that corruption and expose it. And possibly his (?) was being used by Pope Benedict. To out all of this stuff.
And -- go ahead.
TAYLOR: Yeah. Those are questions that we're still trying to figure out. I want to be very careful not to say, Pope Benedict was the super saint mastermind playing (?) this is an old man, who is in his 80s. I mean, it's -- very few of us have had the experience of being old and tired and surrounded.
And so I don't think we could make it just as easy as the good guys and the bad guys here. But definitely Pope Benedict was doing investigations.
And he appointed a man who was becoming very famous in the last couple of years. Archbishop (?)
GLENN: I love him.
ADAM: Yeah, he's great. He's a good guy.
He appointed him, back in -- I think it was 2009. He appointed him, secretary general of the Vatican City.
And this is sort of a ruling body. And he wanted him to look into the financial accountability of the Vatican bank.
And as soon as he was hired by Benedict for this job, he found a -- a negative deficit of the equivalent of 10.5 million. And then found a surplus of random money that was in various bank accounts of 44 million. He did that in just 12 months. Viganò did. (?) which shows you that the people who were already in there, were playing fast and loose with accounting.
Viganò (?) some cardinals. I won't go into all the names. But if you want them, I can give them to you.
GLENN: No, no. That's all right.
TAYLOR: And he got in big trouble. So what did Benedict did? He took Viganò. (?) the apostolic, (?) the ambassador to America. Washington, DC. Now I want you toggle and do an audit on the American bishops (?) and the American Catholic Church. That's what Viganò did. (?) and guess, what he undercovered (?) archbishop of DC. Who was molesting children. Embezzling money. Just a wicked Judas of a man. Viganò (?) five years, pointing the finger at Francis for corruption.
So all these characters are woven together. It's a pretty small world, in the Vatican.
GLENN: So let me switch topics here and kind of go to what happened, what? Yesterday or the day before. Unprecedented. The pope writes a book. And it's held until after his death. And he just exposes some really nasty things. And I want to get into your thoughts on that. What did he say?
Why did he wait in and what is going to be the fallout (?) for everybody else in all of our churches that aren't Catholic?
Back in just a second. Annette writes in about her (?) the Quick Start program. I was completely out of pain in a week. I've been suffering from knee and foot pain.
I had a lot of trouble walking. But I don't anymore. I've been taking it for months now. And I can feel the difference if I miss a dose. Amen for that. Annette, thank you for writing in.
If you or somebody, you know, is (?) give Relief Factor a try. 70 percent of the people who try it, go on to order more, month after month. Kind of fit into the category of Annette. Try it. 19.95. It's a trial pack. Try it for three weeks.
ReliefFactor.com. Or 800-4-Relief. 800-4-Relief.
Feel the difference. Ten-second station ID.
So it was a tell-all memorandum with our. And it was -- (?) it was a book of really unexpected Revelations. And it came from the Vatican. It came from the archbishop. Who was the right-hand man of Pope Benedict.
And it was supposedly written by the two of them. I think?
Or Pope Benedict. And it exposes all of the things pope been ticket wanted to expose.
And it's some nasty exposé.
Never really done before.
Am I right?
TAYLOR: Yeah. As far as I know, it's never been done.
There was a rumor, that Pope Benedict was going to release his final spiritual testimony after he died. And after he died, it came out. Everybody said, it was a nothing burger. Kind of reminisced about his childhood and family. Then (?) I actually have an advanced English copy.
I don't know if he's official or not. I'll read you a section of it. This is Pope Benedict.
Quote, in several (?) were formed. Which acted more or less openly. And which clearly changed the atmosphere in seminaries. In a seminary in southern Germany, candidates for the priesthood, and candidates fort (?) lived together.
And it goes on. He talks about also the American bishops. And how they sort of lost their vision for the gospel. For assisting the poor. For preaching the truth. Drawing people to Jesus Christ.
And instead, kind of just became -- not in his words. But sort of the chaplains to the Democratic Party. You know, the woke agenda. The Great Reset.
And this kind of makes sense. I mean, if you're Satan, you want to be in the highest corridors of power.
And that has to do with both religion and politics.
And there was a woman aliened bella Dodd. Who in the '50s said (?) she was a communist operator. She had a big conversion. And she said, she had placed over a thousand communist men in the seminaries. That was back then.
So this kind of thing was happening. And it's -- it's just like we have a Deep State. This is the Deep Church.
GLENN: So Pope Francis recently came out and said, the devil is among us.
And he has talked about a great evil.
It sounds like this is what Benedict was also warning against.
But I don't think they see things the same way.
Or do they?
TAYLOR: Well, I liked your comment (?) evil. But they seem to be pointing at one another.
TAYLOR: I think that's -- I think your observation there was a good one. I think there's definitely a war in the Vatican. And this kind of goes back to the '60s. There was this countless. You mentioned in the video, there B (?) third secret of Fatima. In the 1960s, or the second (?) from 1962, to 1965, it was super optimistic. You know, this is the era of color TV. And moon landings and all this.
TAYLOR: And there's this idea, we need to make Christianity. We need to make Catholicism groovy.
GLENN: And that's exactly the right word too.
Because those kinds of churches are just as hip as groovy is. They work just as well.
TAYLOR: Yep. And so there's this idea, we can update and make things cool. So we'll change the liturgy. We'll change the hymns. We'll make things modern. And what we'll do is just give a face-lift to Catholicism, so it's not medieval.
And bells and ropes. And we'll just be really cool.
Well, there's been this battle for the past 60 years on whether that is an actual improvement. Or it's been detrimental.
And it goes hand in hand with the global political agenda.
Should wen on board. Should we be downplaying abortion? Downplaying gay marriage?
You know, and this has been the battle. And the lines are kind of drawn along that fault line.
And I think Benedict, the 16th, as a young man. Was a little bit liberal and more modern. As he aged, as he was a pope. He turned the wheel right. Francis has always been a South American liberation theology, radical, Jesuit. Modernist. And that's just who he is.
And he has -- if anything, he's only gotten more and more leftist, the longer he lives, and the longer he's pope.
GLENN: Go ahead. Go ahead. No, no, no. Go ahead.
TAYLOR: So by having these two catches. You see Pope Francis, for example, he's trying to ban the traditional Latin (?) the Gregorian chant. He doesn't likable the old stuff.
And he's very much (?) on board with like, the vaccine and the theology.
And the great reset.
And he sends representatives to Davos. I mean, this is his worldview. And so when he talks about the devil. I'm not so reason he's talking about the same person that Benedict is talking about.
GLENN: Right. So when I was at the Vatican, this is under Benedict. I had no idea why they did this. It was a surprise to me.
But I was allowed to go to the secret archives with the chief archivist. And the head of the university. Both of them were the -- you know, counselors to the pope, at the time.
And they talked about a war, in the Vatican. And it -- it was described to me, later by a cardinal, as really, truly a Civil War. And they were saying, it's the soul of the church. And we kind of hope Benedict wins. And it's not clear at all. It was shortly after that, that Benedict retired.
And it seemed like almost in retrospect, almost as if the cardinals knew, this could be a possibility. That he would either be killed. Or he would have to retire.
I would like to have you talk about the actual -- it's almost did a vast majority of codish. I hate to say that. But it's almost Da Vinci Code. There is a group inside. (?) how real is this. And does this play at all, into prophecies. Catholic prophecies about these days.
Back in just a second. If you want to hear more from Dr. Tailor marshal. Go to you get.com. (?) Dr. Tailor marshal. He has all kinds of videos up there. And he doesn't just talk about the Catholic Church.
He talks about pretty much everything we talk about here. Maria writes in about her dog's experience with Ruff Greens. She said, she loves this product. She said, her dog had really bad skin allergies. We tried recommending treatments. But nothing worked. Three days into the trial, we started noticing a difference. In -- in two weeks, the odor was gone from her fur. There was no more itching. Her red bumps were all gone. Definitely worth the price. This was something that was developed by naturopathic doctor Dennis black. You sprinkle it on your dog food. (?) probiotics. Antioxidants. You name it. If it's healthy for you and your dog. The right combination for your dog is there in Ruff Greens, most likely.
They are so confident that your dog will like it. But they don't want you to be out in money, in case your dog doesn't. They'll send you the first trial pack for free. You just pay for shipping. At RuffGreens.com/Beck. Just see if your dog likes it. If they do, feed it to them. Put it on their food. And just watch the difference in your dog over the coming months. First trial (?) 833-Glenn-33.
STU: Head over to BlazeTV.com/Glenn. Use the promo code Glenn. You'll save ten bucks. More with Taylor marshal, coming up.
(OUT AT 9:28AM)
GLENN: Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. Today, we're talking to tailor marshal, author of infiltration. Also, host of the Dr. Tailor marshal podcast you can find on YouTube. He talks about (?) a lot of things.
But he is -- he is a very strong Catholic, and this week, we are talking to him about what Pope Benedict did after his death, just a book -- a book just came out. No one in America is talking about it.
And I don't know if anybody in Europe is really talking about it. But it is earth-shattering. And it's all about evil. And evil is becoming more and more clear. At least to me, it is. And before we go on to the war that is going on in the deep church, archbishop Viganò, (?) at one point here recently called out, George Soros, Klaus Schwab, and Bill Gates. And this is the guy who was calling out all the pedophiles, and the banking scandals. Why did he call those three out?
TAYLOR: Well, as time goes on, we see that the deep church and the Deep State, the puppet strings all lead back to the same fingers. So, of course, Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab. The usual suspects. Because you have to realize that the most powerful people in the Deep State, the most -- the billionaires, and the -- the technology giants. They have a strategy, not just for politics. But also for economics. They have a policy -- and they have a policy for religion.
I mean, all the great tyrants also have to control religion.
I mean, that has to be done. This is thought control. And the most powerful thoughts that people have. The powerful feelings they have, is almost always associated to their religion. To their faith. To their convictions.
And so this has to be controlled.
ADAM: And the biggest united religion on earth is Catholicism, with a very centralized nervous system in Vatican City. So, of course, they will go after that. And archbishop Viganò (?) who exposed corruption in the Vatican vein. Who worked in Washington, DC. He knows the Clintons. He knows the Obama's. He knows all these people. And he's met every single Catholic bishop in America. And all the cardinals in America.
He has the receipts. And so he's a in a very unique position, perhaps more than anyone alive. To have worked in the Vatican, in DC, and to see all these things at the time.
GLENN: He's very clear on good and evil. And he -- didn't he say this is a one world government, that is being built by those people in the WEF. And it's one world religion and everything else.
That's what he's really warning about, isn't he?
ADAM: Exactly (?) during the campaign. In fact, he even sent a message during one of the major rallies, that I read from the Supreme Court steps, on behalf of archbishop Viganò. (?)
GLENN: Would you please put a good word for me? I've tried to have him on a billion times. We don't get a response. I would love to do a podcast with him.
TAYLOR: Well, he's in hiding.
GLENN: Well,ening --
TAYLOR: For obvious reasons. But, yes.
TAYLOR: We can work something out. But he is really one of the most dynamic voices on earth, in particular within for -- for Catholics. Or you could say Christians, who have just had enough. You know, who have just had enough of basically politicizing our faith, so that the likes of Bill Gates can grab up more land. And push more experimental medical procedures on the world.
GLENN: So day before so let me -- let me ask you the -- the third secret of Fatima. And if people don't know what Fatima is, it's -- it's a miracle that happened, what?
Right before the --
GLENN: Right before the war. And the Virgin Mary came. And appeared to the children. And said, look, there's going to be a war. It's Russia that's behind a lot of this error.
And Russia needs to be turned over to the Lord.
And their hearts changed. And gave, I think three secrets.
And the last one was kept secret
And it's confusing now, because it supposedly has been revealed.
But then I think Benedict hinted that it really hadn't been revealed.
But it talks about the last black pope, if you will. And I don't mean it as color of your race. I mean as a dark figure, that he's on the wrong side.
Is that true? And do you and others, does very good no believe this is those times? (?) or we're approaching them?
TAYLOR: Yes. I think that the Fatima mystery, and the three secrets of Fatima. In my book, infiltration, it's the very first part of the book. I won't get into all the details. People can look into it, themselves. There's tons of literature on it. (?) maybe since Moses crossing the Red Sea. I know that sounds sensational (?) that was witnessed in a place, a little tiny place.
Fatima, Portugal. And, yes, there were three secrets that were revealed. Just quickly, (?) and people were going there.
Don't listen to people who tell you, there's no hell. Number two, Russia needs to be consecrated.
Russia, the errors of Russia, are about to spill into the entire world. Over the -- this was documented in 1917.
TAYLOR: And what did we see? We saw the rise of communism, (?)
GLENN: National socialism. All of it.
TAYLOR: Cuba. Latin America. What happened in 1917? Either these little kids were just drilling it, you know -- politicians who can see the next hundred years. Or this was really a message from heaven. Then the third secret was written down.
And was supposed to be opened and read to the world, in 1960. Sixty. It's a special message to the world.
And everyone. Even the New York Times was publishing, orientation my goodness, we're go B to have the secret of Fatima. (?) it was a really big deal.
A lot of people forgot it. It was a really big deal.
GLENN: Nobody (?) seemed to release. And you're like, why?
Why hasn't it been released?
TAYLOR: And the secret, talking about a world war, and a worst one after that. Everything that was revealed. Did come after it. So everybody wanted to come in the envelope, what in the envelope (?) John the 23rd opens it. Reads it. Puts it back in. And says, this is not for our time. I'm not releasing it to the world.
And everyone was ticked. Everyone was upset. Exo. This is perhaps the greatest prophetic thing that happened in the last 700 years. And you won't reveal it.
So that was 1959. 1960.
Then something was released in the (?) allegedly the third secret.
As soon as it came out, people questioned it. Because it describes a vision of what seems ton some kind of post-war dystopia. But it doesn't explain what it is, or what should happen. Or what we should do. Like, there's the explanation part that we had in the first and second secret. Is missing in the third secret. This has led to a unanimous agreement by scholars, even people who weren't Catholic. What they gave us in the year 2000, was maybe part of it. But it wasn't the full secret. And why don't we have the full secret. There's people who have speculated. There are people who read it, (?) it has to do with the bad counsel.
With a bad mass.
GLENN: And with -- and with a meeting in Russia, that the pope will go to Russia.
And not to consecrate Russia.
TAYLOR: Yeah. It's hard to know. Because we don't have it. We just (?) kind of get drippings of what it could be. But we do know that Russia is at the center of this whole thing. And we're still living in 2023.
It would be great to get the full secret. To know what it actually says. But my worry is that they put it into a filing cabinet, called trash can. And we may never see it.
That's my concern.
GLENN: I -- I -- Dr. Marshall, we could talk for a long time. I have so many questions for you. But we're almost out of time.
Tell me how this relates.
What's going on in the Catholic Church. Which is a real, true Civil War for the soul.
Just like we're battling for the soul of America in the country. And the West. Everything is being split.
How does this relate? What's going on in being exposed in the Vatican to all of our other churches?
TAYLOR: Well, I think at his it goes back to thought control. They want to control our actions. They want to control our words. You know, if you say certain things, you will be canceled. Just look at what Elon Musk was exposed to in the last several months. And then they ultimately want to control your thoughts.
People want to (?) 666 on the forehead. All of that. Think of the significance of the forehad he. I mean, that is branding. The sign of the devil, upon your mind.
You know, the -- yes. There very much could be a physical manifestation of a sign on your forehead. But ultimately, evil wants to take ownership, and brand your mind. And control your thoughts. And that's where all the tentacles are reaching. This complete thought control.
You will own nothing. You will have nothing of your own. You won't even have your thoughts. And allegedly, we will be happy. Is what they tell us, at the great reset.
GLENN: It's actually -- it's actually in one of their videos. That even your thoughts. Your dreams will be known. So you really will not control your thoughts or be in charge of your thoughts. You will not know which are your thoughts or their thoughts.
It's really spooky.
TAYLOR: That's ultimately, the mark of the beast there. You have 666 on your forehead, literally. Whether it's a contraption. Whether it's a tattoo. We debate that all day. But the significance of that, is that your mind belongs to evil.
GLENN: And is there any doubt in your mind, that this is actual evil. Like we probably haven't seen since maybe the 1930s and '40s? Any doubt in your mind?
TAYLOR: There's no doubt in my mind. No doubt.
The powers. Back then, they have machine guns and planes. Now we have technology.
Now we -- people can spy on you through your phone.
They can control so much. And that hasn't yet been tested by tyrants. And so now we're starting to experience it.
GLENN: Thank you so much, doctor. I hope we get a chance to meet soon. I would love to get you on (?) and things you know about that, that I might have missed. You spread a lot of good, in the world, with your -- with your podcast. So thank you so much. At which time likewise.
GLENN: YouTube (?) really, really reasonable.
Well thought out man. His name is Dr. Tailor marshal. He is the author of the book (?) Taylor marshal podcast. You can find his podcast at YouTube.com/Dr. Taylor marshal.
Global elites and the World Economic Forum may be trying to hide it now, but they’ve clearly stated in the past that by 2030, they want you to ‘OWN NOTHING.’ And that goal, Glenn explains, run entirely oppositely to the principles on which America was founded. Ownership is a HUGE part of the American experiment, so what happens when it’s taken away from us? In this clip, Glenn is joined by Carol Roth, author of ‘The War On Small Business.’ She says the anti-ownership goal of global elites is making us into ‘indentured servants,’ and that there’s one, huge way we can all peacefully fight back…
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Well, Carol, it's a new year. A new you.
How are you?
CAROL: You know, I'm doing well. I'm just making sure that my private jet is doing okay. Because, you know, there was a climate crisis going on. It was very important for me to go take my private jet to go talk about the climate crisis. And then have steak dinners, while I tell everybody that meat is bad. So just trying to get that all together.
GLENN: It is so crazy. By the way, did you hear today, let me see. It was just approved -- where is it? Where is it?
Yeah. The European Union just approved cricket powder, as a component of flower-based foods.
CAROL: Amazing. Amazing. Sounds tasty. Looking very forward to that.
GLENN: Yeah. I unfortunately have a deep allergy to crickets.
I can't have anything with crickets in it. It's too bad.
CAROL: We're all going to develop cricket allergies, as part of our crisis.
GLENN: Yes, and I want to play this clip. This is from the World Economic Forum, last week. Listen.
VOICE: What is a polycrisis? And how and when could it happen?
VOICE: We're actually in the midst of one at the moment. We have energy crisis and food crisis. And they're all happening at the same time. It's the set of concurrent cascading risks that happen at the same time.
So that's where we are today. That's 2023.
What we're seeing though, that in the two-year time frame. And the ten-year time frame, we're at the risk of more of these polycrises unfolding. Two years out, there's still a concern on the experts that we surveyed, that the cost of living will be number one. But at the same time, a big risk of natural disasters. Ten years out, it's all --
GLENN: It's all natural disasters. Nothing else, but natural disasters. She doesn't seem to find any irony in the fact that we're in an energy crisis and a food crisis and a trust crisis. When all of those come directly from the policies of the World Economic Forum.
CAROL: Yeah. First of all, I have to say it sounds more regal, if you say it with sort of a British accent.
Polycrisis sounds much more terrifying. So I think we should do that. But it is. It's so ironic that they're sitting here, and they're talking about the inflation.
They're talking about the energy issues. They're talking about the mistrust and disinformation that came from the policies, that stemmed from global governments, and the World Economic Forum.
I mean, they are the ones that shut down, and said, we need to have this wonderful Great Reset.
They're the ones. The central banks around the world. That printed trillions of dollars. They're the ones that moved away from traditional energy. Because of the push from the World Economic Forum. So they've caused these crisis. All of them. Except for this global climate emergency, that clearly no one is paying attention to.
So we now have to add into our polycrisis or have Al Gore go on an unhinged rant, to make it extra special.
GLENN: Can you give direct correlation to our inflation from ESG?
CAROL: 100 percent. If you think about what inflation looks like. A large percentage of that was gas. Some of that was shipping costs, related to the cost of gas. And then, you know, fossil fuels have 6,000 derivative products, that all thing up in price, because of the cost. And the cost went up because we didn't have enough supply. And we didn't have enough supply because of ESG policies. ESG policies directed capital away from investments in fossil fuel, to the extent that Saudi Arabia, and OPEC, says that we're underinvested by, like, $12.1 trillion over the next coming decades.
So by doing that, by ensuring that companies, who make the investments in drilling and processing, for fossil fuels. Couldn't do that.
They are directly attributable, to the increase in prices. As well as, you know, the obvious direct correlation to the increased energy prices.
GLENN: So here is something that you're hearing. And you're just hearing the setup, right now.
That the Republicans are going to be so dangerous on this debt ceiling. And we are just going to default on all of our debts. And we will have no credibility.
We have no credibility now. But we're not going to default on our debts. But they are talking about the debt ceiling.
Why should the average person care about this?
CAROL: So the reality is, we shouldn't care about the debt ceiling. We should care about spending.
I mean, the debt ceiling is just saying, we cannot finance our overspending with debt anymore. But they don't do that at the same time that they pass the bill. They do it after the fact. So they've already spent the money. And you have to pay for it.
Short-term, we're not going to default on -- on our debt. It's just stupid. We have plenty of assets, that we could lease or we could sell if we got into a pickle, or things that could be reconfigured around. But in the medium to long-term, the spending is unsustainable.
And so if you overspend, and you have a deficit, there are only so many ways to find it. And we're probably not selling off all our assets at this point in time.
So that means, we're going to finance it with debt. And it's just going to become by and large, and bigger. To the point, that it becomes unsustainable, from a tax standpoint. From a money printing and erosion of your wealth and value standpoint.
And so that's really the area that -- this whole debt thing is kind of the sideshow at the circus. We need to be focusing on the main act. And that is the spending.
And I said this before, Glenn. If we just rolled back, like, five years.
If we went back to 2018 spending, which, you know, two years before the pandemic. Or even the year before the pandemic, we would be running a surplus, we would be paying down debt.
Or 2018, we would be about breaking even. So it's not like we would have to change that much, to get this under control. And they refused to do it.
GLENN: Okay. There was a call last week, for a windfall tax on food companies.
I've never heard anything more dangerous and stupid than that.
CAROL: So there's a legendary investor named Charlie Munger. He's Warren Buffett's partner in Brookshire Hathaway, one of the best.
And he has this famous saying that says, show me the incentive, and I will show you the outcome.
The reality is that taxes influence behavior. And if you don't want something, you tax it. That's what you do. Right?
GLENN: Right. A tax on SUVs.
CAROL: Right. A tax on Sim products. Alcohol. We don't want them.
We tax those things. By the way, the things we want. We get tax credits.
GLENN: Marriage, kids. All of it. Yeah.
CAROL: So here's what you're saying. We're going to tax food. And it's saying, we do not want you to produce food.
Who says that, other than utterly nefarious, and crazy people, who want people to starve.
It is utter insanity. And the fact that people are like, oh, yeah. That makes a lot of sense.
We should definitely put a tax on food!
It's -- I mean --
GLENN: First of all, that -- that does not hurt anybody at Davos. But it hurts the very poorest among us, in the world.
And I'm not even talking about America. I mean the poor of the poor. And they're already in a food shortage. These people are so anti-human, they do want people to starve.
They also, you know, said that they are raising, I think it's $3 trillion, privately, and with the help of governments. To buy farmland. To buy up 30 percent of the land eventually, 50 percent, on the entire planet.
GLENN: And they're talking about 30 percent by the end of this decade. And they're going to do it with fundraising. I mean, the guy who was talking about it, was -- was John Kerry.
I mean, it's insanity.
They -- when will people understand, they mean you will own nothing.
CAROL: Perhaps when they read my next book, which you have been instrumental in helping shape.
Which ironically, is called You Will Owe Nothing.
And connect the dots between all of these things that they are saying, and the destruction of our property rights and freedom.
I mean, when they come out and say, oh, you know, we -- you owe nothing. That's a right-wing conspiracy.
It's not. It was on their website. In an article in 2016, which now they -- I think they have pulled. So we --
GLENN: Yeah, they have. They have.
CAROL: We can use the wayback machine to resource it. Then they made a video that they put their logo on, that it was their first prediction.
So they're predicting the end of private property. This is not a coincidence. And, by the way, it's not like a cute little Jetsons fantasy. It's not Rosie the Robot folding your laundry. Like, these are scary things. But they're going, oh, this is going to be great for you.
This is not great. And so going through all the different things. That we've been talking about, ESG. The purchase of land by private individuals.
It is scary how much has been purchased by a small group of people, and as you said, the government is now paying to take some of that farmland, out of commission.
There are reasons for this. There are sort of empire cycle reasons for this. And there is a jockeying of the elite to put themselves in positions to rule.
GLENN: What do you mean an empire building process? What do you mean?
CAROL: End of empire. So basically, we are where the Romans were at one point in time. Where the British were. Where the Dutch were. And here's this sort of disconnect between high debt loads and power. And when we're in a high debt situation like the US is, and frankly a number of other countries, the people in charge get desperate. And they start doing desperate things. They never cut back on services.
They never try to salvage it. They just kind of run straight into that cliff. This has happened many, many times in history.
And we're moving in that direction. The elites see this.
So all these things we're seeing is basically them trying to reshape the outcome and put themselves up on top, by having you owe nothing.
I'm going to go back to owning nothing.
And the -- what that does to a nation, that was built around ownership.
That is a total reversal of the basic foundation of America, and most of the western world now.
More with Carol Roth. I'm sure you can -- can you order the -- the book yet?
CAROL: No. But you can sign up for more information at CarolRoth.com/Glenn.
And we'll let you know.
GLENN: Yeah. It will be a good book. I have seen the outlines. And it's really -- she's good.
All right. Donald wrote in about his dog's experience with Ruff Greens. He says, I've never seen my dog lick the bowl clean. I mean, she's licking the bowl clean all the time now.
Because she's looking for any remaining traces of Ruff Greens.
My dog does that too. And I'm like, dude, it's not soaking into the metal. You're done. You're done. And man, lick and lick and lick.
You really need to check out what Ruff Greens can do. It's not a dog food. It's a supplement. Developed by naturopathic Dr. Dennis Black. You sprinkle it on the dog's food. And it's chalked full of vitamins, minerals, probiotics, antioxidants. You name it.
If it's healthy for your dog, it's probably in Ruff Greens. I want you to see the special deal, where you can get the first bag free. It's just a trial bag that you can just test, to make sure your dog likes it.
They don't want to you pay for anything, if your dog doesn't like it. But if your dog likes it, then start on Ruff Greens.
And feed Ruff Greens -- put it on the food, every single day, twice a day.
And over the months, you'll see a huge difference in your dog, at least I have.
And so has everybody here, that's tried it. The first trial bag is free.
You just pay for shipping at Ruff Greens. R-U-F-FGreens.com/Beck. That's RuffGreens.com/Beck. Or you can call 833-Glenn-33. 833-Glenn-33. RuffGreens.com/Beck. Ten-second station ID.
GLENN: So what does this mean, Carol, the -- the idea that you will own nothing, in a country that's whole identity and whole theory is that you can become wealthy. You can change your station by even landownership. Just being able to own something and call it yours, is fundamental to the American experiment.
What does that do to us?
CAROL: I mean, if you owe nothing, then the powers that be, own you.
It completely changes everything. It crushes the American dream. And it makes basically -- basically makes people indentured servants to the government.
And, you know, to some extent, big tech as well. I mean, that's really -- if you think about all these things that are being put out there, they sort of want to take your life and rent it back to you. Whether it be through a terms of service, or through, you know, dependence on the government. But that is the goal. They want that intradependence. They want you to not have freedom. Not to have agency. Not to make your own choice.
They want to control everything you do.
And it's coming from a wealth standpoint. It's coming from a technology standpoint. It's coming from a cultural standpoint.
Social credit. So, you know, really, this is -- this is a war. And this is one that you're going to have to fight, on multiple fronts. And at the end of the day, we need people to own everything.
We need you to have that ownership, so that you can fight back, and not be at their whim.
And not be an indentured servant to big technology, to big business, and to the global elites.
GLENN: If we don't stop the regulatory state, the unelected officials from just being able to introduce new rules on things.
If we don't stop that, you -- you won't own anything.
Because they will make it so onerous, that there's no way you could afford to own it. They don't have to take it. If you're so broke, there's nothing else you can do, but sell it.
CAROL: Yeah. It used to be when they were looking for riches, they would go out and invade another land. And they would take those riches. And obviously that's somewhat politically unpopular. But for whatever reason, this legal plunder, the idea that they're stealing our wealth and doing it in a legal way, because they're passing the rules and the regulations that we have to deal with, somehow is more palatable to people. And it shouldn't be. This is your wealth.
GLENN: That's the sheriff of Nottingham story. I mean, all the king did was just say, hey, what's yours is now mine.
GLENN: Go, sheriff, go out and take it. And he would take it.
That's Robin Hood. This is the part they always get wrong. They think Robin Hood worked for the government.
No. Robin Hood was against the government. Because they were doing exactly what they were proposing to do, to the entire world now.
CAROL: Yeah. And if you look at just a case study, like Venezuela, who, you know, mid-last century was the fourth wealthiest nation in the world, and they used this rhetoric. They said, things are unequal. And we wanted to make it more fair.
So us and the government, we'll just nationalize everything.
We'll take it over, and you'll be so much better off. And with that, they went from the fourth wealthiest country in the world, to, you know, a recent study, showed that the median net worth of a person in Venezuela was zero! Literally zero.
So that is, you know, a very clear case study on how quickly it can happen.
To say, it will never happen here in America. Ten years ago, 15 years ago, maybe I agree with you, Glenn. But look at what just happened over the past few years. Look at the level of compliance, with these COVID rules and regulations. They took away people's jobs and livelihood. Of course, they're going to continue down.
GLENN: I remember saying in 2008. We stay on this path, we will be Venezuela.
Venezuela had just really collapsed. And I realized at the time. And I said it at the time. It took 20 years, to take that strong state, that was the fourth wealthiest, and destroy it.
Well, we are now approaching a 20-year mark, where we have been doing it.
It's not out of the realm of possibility. In fact, every day we continue down this road, it becomes more likely. All right. Her new book coming out soon. You will own nothing.
CarolRoth.com/Glenn. Will get you all the information. CarolRoth.com/Glenn.
Carol, talk to you again.
CAROL: Thanks, Glenn.