RADIOMarch 27, 2023

EXPLAINED: How the Fed’s FedNow program WILL end in a CBDC

The Federal Reserve’s new service for banks, called FedNow, promises increased flexibility, faster transactions, and instant payments with one, small cost: The potential END to your financial freedom. In this clip, Glenn is joined by Justin Haskins, co-author of their new book, ‘Dark Future.’ Haskins explains how — despite what the Federal Reserve may say — this new service is NOT an alternative to a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)…rather, it’s a giant stepping stone toward it. Watch Glenn tackle this topic further in his upcoming Glenn TV Wednesday Night Special, airing on YouTube and BlazeTV.com on March 29th.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is with us. Justin is the -- he's with the socialism research center, at the Heartland Institute, where he is the director. He has been working tirelessly on stopping socialism.

He is also -- he was one of our main contributors to our Arguing With Socialists book.

He is also my coauthor of the book, The Great Reset. And our fourth coming book. We're all going to die.

I'm not sure exactly -- what did we name it, Justin?

That was my working title for quite some time.

JUSTIN: Are we telling people? Is this the first time?

GLENN: I don't know. Can we?

Check Amazon, see if it's up for sale.
If it's up for sale, we'll announce it. It's supposed to be in the next few days.

JUSTIN: The name of the book.

GLENN: Don't say it. Don't say it.

So, Justin, you wrote to me something kind of disturbing.

Last hour, I played these happy little commercials from the Federal Reserve about the Fed Now.

It's a new service for all of the banks, which will -- which will make the transfer of funds, you know, whether you're out shopping or you're a business owner, or you're doing bank-to-bank transactions.

You just run everything through the Federal Reserve, and it will happen fast. And I thought --

JUSTIN: Yeah. Isn't that exciting?

GLENN: Very exciting. Now, they're claiming that this is the alternative to a CBDC, which is a Central Bank Digital Currency.

It doesn't really sound so much like an alternative, as much as, I don't know, a system to run that on.

JUSTIN: Yeah. Basically, this is -- this is like Jason Buttrill, your head researcher. Because he and I are now best friends. We exchange emails all the time.

He came up with this great analogy.

This is like the drug dealer, who is new on the block. And he will not just start injecting people with heroin. That's not how you sell lots of drugs. That's not how you do it.

First, you get them hooked.

You just give them a little taste. And then after they get a little taste, now they're hooked. Then you can start really pushing the hard stuff. That's what this is all about.

The Federal Reserve is basically a drug pusher. Okay?

And this is the start of it.

Normally, regular folks like you and me, and people in the audience, we don't interact with the fed. We're not used to that.

We don't like the fed.

We don't trust them very much. And so what they want to say is, just have a little taste. You'll see. It will be great.

Just have a little taste. This is a steppingstone to a CBDC.

This is our first interaction to using the fed directly.

So that we can become more comfortable with it. So it's normalized. And then after this, you'll get a central bank digital currency.

We already know this, because there's a billion government reports talking about how they'll design it, what it will look like.

Why people should use it.

What the principles should be, behind it. All of that kind of stuff.

So we know a CBDC is coming. This is just the first step in that process, to try to normalize people interacting directly with the fed in this sort of high-tech instant transfer payment portal.

GLENN: So we've been talking about the uniform commercial code, which is complicated. And it's -- it's usually nothing anyone should ever have to think about. However, they have included central bank digital currency as the new definition of money.

But money makes us think of money, that you can take from the bank. That you own it. You get paid. You get to do what you want with it.

But central bank digital currency, is not really money. Correct?

JUSTIN: Yeah. What's happening in more than 20 states across the country right now, and it's going to happen in all 50 states eventually. Is lawmakers are looking at updating the Uniform Commercial Code so that a foundation is being laid for a future central bank digital currency.

And not just any kind of central bank digital currency, but a central bank digital currency that is programmable, trackable. That you won't have any privacy with the things that you're doing with the CBDC, that it can be controlled and manipulated. This kind of thing is being manipulated into the code. They don't use the world central bank digital currency. But they outline it, in such a way so that that has to be what they're talking about. So it's not creating the CBDC. That's not what this is aiming to do. It's just laying the foundation to make it easier to use it in certain kinds of commercial transactions.

GLENN: So people know, and this is what you really have to understand. This is not like Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is such a danger, because you get to do with it, what you want to do with it.

And the Federal Reserve is not aware of anything, and can't do anything.

You have the ultimate power with your money. The opposite is true with the fed coin, that they will be introducing. And this is what makes it so dangerous. Not just the tracking.

They're not -- they will not just know absolutely everything that you spend. But Justin said a key word that most people don't really understand. It's programmable. Meaning, it is programmable for the individual. So, in other words, if the government decides that they're going to -- you know, we need to get -- we need to cut down on fat, fat, fatties. Then my digital coin, will not allow me to buy fatty foods. I wouldn't be able to go to McDonald's. I'm using this as an example. There's not anything in the works to do this.

Except, this is what programmable means. They can program it, so if they say, you know what, nobody is going to work. You're not an essential employee.

Your coin will not buy gas.

So you can go to -- try to fill up. But when you put your digital card in the fed, it will say denied. And you won't have any way, other than that card, to be able to buy what you need. It's absolute control of your life.

JUSTIN: Yes. That is exactly right.

And there actually have been things. Statements that have been made by the Biden administration itself. Where it is said, as part of its reports, studying CBDCs and the benefits of it. And how it would be designed.

If they were to make a CBDC, even though they've haven't committed to doing that exactly. They have done all of the groundwork for it.

They've said flatout, that a CBDC needs to account for climate change. It needs to have financial inclusion built into it.

It needs to have equity built into it.

It needs to have concerns about pollution, built into it. They have worked with hundreds of stakeholders. And we all know what that means. Nonprofit groups. And labor organizations and others.

GLENN: Community activists.

JUSTIN: To help design the CBDC. So why are they doing all of that? Because it is going to be programmed, so that you can use it in certain ways, so that it can be prohibited in other ways.

And it can change on a dime. See, that's the other important thing.

It's not -- when it's programmable, they can change the rules whenever they want. It's not as though, they set the rules at the beginning, and that's the rules forever.

They can change the rules as they go. That's the threat of a programmable currency. So it's a huge threat to liberty.

GLENN: And all they will concentrate on is the one fact, and mark my words, this is the way it's going to happen.

We'll have a banking collapse.

Because there's a banking collapse, that will cause the dollar to skyrocket in inflation, possibly hyperinflation. Because you won't be able to have a supply chain anymore.

So many people will be unemployed. There's so much money awash, that if you want to buy something, well, you have 100 bucks?

Yeah. I'll buy that for $100. And it might be something that was worth $4 before the collapse.

And people will pay it. Hyperinflation will go crazy.

The fed will say, look, we have to stop it. Inflation is too much.

We will give you digital currency. It's already in a bank with your name.

All you have to do is sign in, and it will give you the money. And that is what will change inflation.

How do we know about that? Because we wrote about it, in a arguing -- I believe it was in Arguing with Socialists. A chapter we almost didn't put in about Modern Monetary theory. And Modern Monetary theory, is what we're operating on.

We can spend as much money as we want, don't worry about inflation. If they have digital control of everyone's spending.

JUSTIN: Right. Exactly right. We talked about it both in Arguing with Socialists and The Great Reset.

It's a huge part of both socialist plans and Great Reset's elites plans. And those are not necessarily the same group. But there's no doubt about it, that that's the goal.

So why are there 20-some-odd states in the United States right now? Many of them are red states. Texas, Kentucky, Arizona, Oklahoma, North Dakota, Missouri, Montana, Arkansas, et cetera.

Why are they all doing whatever they possibly can, on the UCC code, updating it to make it at least a little bit easier for a CBDC to be utilized in the future. When a CBDC doesn't even exist yet.

Why would they be doing that? That is a really, really important question. But it's much worse than everything we've said so far.

And that's -- having worked with these lawmakers across the country. We have started to discover things in the UCC.

In the commercial code, that are incredibly, incredibly disturbing. Things that most of us just didn't realize were true. And if CBDC's happen, we're in for a world of hurt, that we didn't see coming.

And the reason for that, is under commercial code. When you take money, like if you have cash right now, under the current code. And you go to the bank, and you put money into the bank.

That money is no longer your money. That money is actually now owned by the bank.

GLENN: Hang on just a second.

This is why you -- and this changed. Part of this changed in 2008. You are the lender of last resort, right?

You are the last person in line, to get money, if you have deposited into the bank. Because the bank, when you give them that money, and deposit it. They are then taking that money.

They don't have to ask for permission to loan it out.

They take that money as theirs. And they loan it out.

So what happens to your money?

Well, you don't have money. You -- what you have is a number in the bank, that the bank can now give back to you, or if they go belly-up? Well, then, you lose your money because it wasn't yours anyway. Correct?

JUSTIN: Yes. It's not your money. It's owned by the bank now.

Now, you can go to the bank and say, I want my money back. And then they hand you the money in cash, and you can walk out the door. And that money is yours.

You own that money. But here's the thing about a central bank digital currency: And this is what we're beginning to learn.

How the commercial code deals with that. When you -- you can't put Central Bank Digital Dollars, okay? Digital fed coin. You can't put that in your pocket, and walk out the door. Can you?

It has to be somewhere. It can't be in your actual possession. And because of that --

GLENN: Well, wait. Bitcoin, you can put on a thumb drive. And so you can walk away with it. But digital currency, central bank, no.

JUSTIN: Yes. Correct. They're not going to design it so you can put it into a hard drive or something like that.

But even if -- even if they did, the uniform -- that's why they're updating the uniform commercial code the way they are.

They're putting rules into place, so that you could use a CBDC, even if it is possible to download it on to a hard drive or something like that.

But the layers behind the uniform commercial code, acknowledge in their various meetings and comments and other things, that it's highly unlikely that a CBDC would ever be designed in that way.

It's not -- you will have to put it into some kind of account. So what does that mean?

What it means in effect is that all of the money. All of the CBDC money that exists in society. Will be owned by whoever owns the account.

Which means the fed, or the bank. Or whoever is designated by the Federal Reserve Bank to operate that system.

But you, the individual person, will not own the money.

The money will belong to someone else. It will not belong to you. You will not own it. Under the commercial code, as it is written right now.

Forget about what they're advising it to. Under right now, you would not own any money.

It would all belong to someone else. So forget about whether it's programmable from a design perspective. In practice, it will not be your money anyway.

And so how can you not think of that famous article for the World Economic Forum, we've talked about a thousand times.

In the future, you will own nothing.

And you will have no privacy. Well, it seems like that's what the purpose of this is. So it is not enough to simply kill the UCC bill updates that we're talking about all across the country. That is essential. But we need to do more than that. We need to rewrite that code so that CBDCs cannot be used in a variety of other contexts as well.

GLENN: All right. Stand by. Stand by.

I think that we have to -- we have to really, truly get down to a basic line here, that you have to do in your own state.

And I'm not sure. And I want to talk to Justin. That the UCC code is enough.

And we'll talk about it here, in just 60 seconds.

You know, some people have a hard time falling asleep. I have a hard time falling asleep.

And what? Three times in the last seven days probably. I took Relief Factor sleep. It works wonders for me.

When you -- when you don't get your sleep, you fall asleep in meetings.

Oh, that's really good. When you don't get your sleep, you're not performing at your best. Relief Factor sleep is 100 percent drug-free. It's a blend of natural ingredients.

And it promotes healthy sleep by reducing anxiety and distress and improving mood. Promoting relaxation. My wife and I, we were in Costco yesterday, and we were loading up on, you know, just different medicines and things like that.

And I said, honey, because Rafe used to take melatonin. I said, you want to get some extra melatonin? She said, no, it doesn't work.

Relief Sleep is much better. And it's true. If it doesn't work for you, this is the same kind of thing as melatonin, except it's better, and it's all 100 percent natural ingredients.

So unleash the power of great sleep by calling 800-4-Relief. 800-4-Relief. Do it now. Or go to relieffactor.com.

Read all about it. Try it. It's really remarkable. And you are left refreshed. You don't feel it in your system at all. Dream big, sleep tight. Relief Factor sleep at ReliefFactor.com. Ten-second station ID.
(music)

GLENN: All right. Justin, we have -- we have been talking about the UCC code. And we've been telling people not to allow it to pass. Now you've been working with legislatures, all over the country. And these legislators are telling you, no. There's much more to the code. We have to change it.

Would it be better just to go for states passing law, that CBDCs can't be used for commerce?

JUSTIN: So it's a really complicated question because there are all sorts of issues related to the Constitution and who has the authority to regulate money.

And whether or not a state can even pass a law, that outright rejects the use of -- of an established form of money, at the federal level.

Because it's a federal responsibility, to coin money.

Of course, there are people who say, well, yeah. But coining money means physical money, not digital money.

And so maybe they are allowed to do it. And so I think there are a lot of open questions about that, that we don't necessarily know.

I think that the most effective thing that legislators can do.

And legislators actually do not know a lot of the things I've told you today. I've gotten that from a lot of UCC lawyers, actually.

But what they need to do. They need to focus first, in my opinion.

I think Americans would be much better off, if lawmakers killed the UCC bills. Okay?

If they killed the UCC bills to update them right now, they would be much better off.

But then they also need to update the UCC and all other state laws that they can possibly find, in ways, that would make it so that a central bank digital currency, is undermined in the state, in financial transactions.

For example, can you use a CBDC? A programmable digital currency, when you're using -- for collateral and a loan, let's say.

Okay?

State laws dictate some of that, and they can undermine that.

They can do things like that, to undermine the use of a CBDC, and I think that's what they have to do.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

The Shocking Miracles That Turned a Former Atheist to God

What happens when science can’t explain the impossible? Glenn Beck sits down with ex-atheist and best-selling author Lee Strobel to uncover the shocking truth about modern-day miracles. From a young girl declared brain-dead who later returned describing her family’s private life, to blind people who suddenly “see” during a near-death experience, the evidence is piling up. Strobel reveals documented cases, even published in peer-reviewed medical journals, that point to one undeniable truth: miracles are real, and God is still at work today. Whether you’re a skeptic or a believer, this conversation will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew about life, death, and the supernatural.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with Lee Strobel HERE

No, Trump isn't erasing slavery's history in Smithsonian

The Leftist media found their latest 'scandal' when President Trump accused the Smithsonian museum of focusing too much on how "bad slavery was." Democratic media outlets were quick to accuse Trump of believing that there must be GOOD aspects of slavery. But does anybody ACTUALLY believe that what Trump was saying? Glenn and Stu go through the critical context of what Trump was talking about while blasting the media for purposefully misleading the public with their biased spin.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: You know, it's one thing to get a story wrong.

It's one thing to misunderstand, or whatever. But it's -- it's an entirely other thing to intentionally take things out of context.

Intentionally leave things off the table.

Intentionally paint a picture, that you know is not true.

The Smithsonian story, that came out yesterday. That -- this is prime example of that.

STU: Yes. This one really annoys me. And this is a certain thing that mainstream media does a lot, particularly with Donald Trump.

In that, they -- it's -- a certain form of resistance journalism, if you will.

Where they don't come out and say, Donald Trump believes slavery is good. That's not the headline.

The headline today was -- this is the New York Times. Trump says Smithsonian focuses too much on, quote, how bad slavery was. End quote.

Now, that headline is very specifically crafted to present --

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: A couple of thoughts in your head. Right?

You're supposed to think, wait a minute. Trump thinks -- the Smithsonian is focusing too much on how bad slavery is.

Well, what he must mean is, he thinks it's good. There were good aspects of it --

GLENN: It wasn't as bad. It wasn't as bad as everything.

STU: Right. Like he's making some excuse for the horrors of slavery.

And, of course, if he did do that, it would be a story. Right? Like, it would be a story if Donald Trump came out and said, you know what, slavery actually wasn't that bad. It was a pretty good. That's a real story. Of course, he didn't say anything like that.

And we know that -- you know, if you have a couple of brain cells, you know this for multiple reasons.

Number one: You might note, that politicians don't say things like that.

Nobody says things like that.

GLENN: But he says everything!

He just says it.

GLENN: Oh, that's right.

He's the worst guy in the world.

Of course, that's the headline that's designed to lead that horse to water.

That resistance warrior who already believes everything terrible about Donald Trump. This is another thing for them to make them hate him more. Because they're the only people who would -- could possibly believe the spin you're getting from the Times. They're -- that water. They're the ones that will drink after they're led to that water. Right?

Those people are the targets. We know that even if politicians believed something like that.

Which, of course, most people don't. Almost no one does.

But even if a politician did believe that, they don't just blurt it out. That's not the type of thing people do.

So you're supposed to think, in the parentheses of your mind.

You're supposed to say, oh, well.

He just let that one slip out.

He does believe it. He normally wouldn't say this, but he let it slip out.

Another reason, you should obviously know this spin is wrong.

Donald Trump has said slavery is bad over and over and over and over and over again, like all other human beings in 2025, right? He said it over and over and over again. Now, in parentheses, you're supposed to think, all those times were false. So he was lying all the other times, but this one time he let the truth slip out, which is that he actually thinks slavery is not that bad.

Now, both of those things are insane to believe. But of course, it's not the main thing that should convince you.

It's the context of how he was talking about this. He wasn't saying that slavery wasn't bad. What was -- what -- he was saying, quite clearly was, the Smithsonian, an American institution, was focusing too much on the negatives about our history. Rather than the positives of our history.

And he -- we should instead, have more focus on the positives. We know this, because he actually said it! He said, quote.

His complaint was, nothing about success. Nothing about brightness. Nothing about the future.

In other words, this American institution should talk a little bit more positively about America.

Not erase everything negative about America.

It's like, if you wanted to -- you know, the -- the new England patriots Hall of Fame museum.

And every display was about Eli Manning and Nick Foles. It's like, yeah. They did have a couple of Super Bowl losses. Sure, that's part of their story. But if you looked at it. And everything was about the Eagles and the Giants winning those games, you would have no idea, that they had a dynasty in there. Right?

Like that they're one of the best football teams of all time. You would totally lose that.

And that's it real story of America. I know you focus on that, Glenn. Because you in your museum. Have a lot of things that are bad about your history.

GLENN: No, I collect -- David Barton has collected so much of the good stuff, and I collect the dark stuff. Because if you don't -- if we don't teach our kids, that these dark things happened in this country, two things happen: One, they don't believe us, on the good things.

When they hear those dark things, and they didn't come from us. They just automatically think, well, you don't -- you're lying to me. You never told me about any of this stuff.

STU: Right.

GLENN: So you have to tell the worst parts of it. You have to.

The second reason it is really important is if you don't teach that, you will repeat it!

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Even if you teach it, we generally repeat it.

But you have a better chance, if you can teach it -- you know, history -- here's the problem.

The Smithsonian, and everybody else, is trying to make history about now.

Right now. What does this mean, right now?

I'm going to judge it through the eyes of right now. Well, history is about the past.

It's about the past.

How did people think back then?

Why did they think that way, back then?

Who fought against that, at that time?

What was the real argument?

I mean, there are people now, scholars. Who will tell you, that Frederick Douglass never -- never said a good word about the Constitution.

Well, that's just absolutely dishonest.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Frederick Douglass was a guy who said the Constitution was a slave document.

And then he was told, by, I can't remember who.

He was told by. Because we have the book at the library, at our museum.

He was told, read the Unconstitutionality of Slavery. When he read that and then went back and read the Constitution in that light, he was like, oh, my gosh. This is the greatest freedom document of all time. But people want now in academia and in our museums, they want to say, no! Because they're trying -- their goal is to get rid of the Constitution. My goal is to make sure we don't make these same kinds of mistakes again. I want to know the truth.

Let me be the judge. Tell me the good and the bad.

Tell me honest history.

That's what I want to know.

And they don't do that. I was up at the portrait gallery.

Tania and I had to go to the White House for something.

Oh, it was the interview.

And so we had a couple of hours before the interview with Donald Trump.

And so we went to the national port rat gallery.

And now -- Stu, tell me what you think might be in the National Portrait Gallery.

STU: I would maybe guess that they're portraits of important figures in American history.

GLENN: Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Portraits. Okay.
First of all, it was the dirtiest, most filthy museum I have been in. It was filthy!

It's like, I mean, we walked in. I thought we were walking into some sort of employee door. Honest to God. You were with me, weren't you, Jason?

JASON: Yeah.

GLENN: It was like we walked in like the back door. I really thought we were in the wrong place because it was filthy. Nope. That was the front door. So we get in, and we start seeing. And there's portraits. And they've got some really great art.

But you start to notice things like, wait a minute.

This is the national portrait gallery.

Why do you have a 1970's girls swinger bicycle with Cuban flags and stickers of Che on it?

What --

STU: What.

GLENN: What is that all about? Okay. And there was a good portion of the portrait gallery that was like that.

They had one room. And if you've ever been to like a science museum. And they have a big dinosaur.

You know, and they have all the bones up there.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Okay. It was about that size.

And correct me from I'm describing this incorrectly, Jason.

You remember it.

It was in the last room. This big, huge gallery. And it was -- it was -- it looked like bones.

Like a vertebra. Okay? And it came out. It was across most of the room. Probably 70 percent of the room had this in the center of it. Agreed with that, Jason?

JASON: Yeah. Perfect.

GLENN: And it was bronze or gold or something.

And they were fists. Well, what are those fists? That was the black power fist, given at the 68 Mexico City Olympics. Okay?

Black power.

A, what did that cost us.

What did that cost us to install.

And what does that say?

What is that?

Again, completely for no reason.

You want to do a deal where you're talking about, for instance, not maybe in the portrait gallery.

But you're doing an exhibit on pushback, on rebellions, on people who have moved the civil rights forward.

Whatever it is. That's where that belongs.

But it seems as though everything is telling us, it's a bad nation. And communism is neat!

This is our government's pay -- our tax dollars pay for this museum. People come from all over the world, to learn about America!

And all they hear about America is, we're a bad place. And communism is neat.

What the hell is that?

That all should be -- I mean, I would -- I would give my right arm to be on the counsel of the art museum. It would drive them out of their minds.

Out of the art museums.

And the Smithsonian. I would give my right arm. And maybe part of my left arm, to be able to do that.

Because it's everywhere. It's everywhere.

And I'm a guy who wants to tell the dark side of America. But that's like if I said to you. I want to tell the good side of America.

We meet the Nazis suspect so every museum, the point of every museum, always led you back to, we built the Nazis!

Because of the -- we -- we broke the back of the Nazis, because the greatest American generation. That's one story of America.

That's not the story of America!

That's one story.

You want to tell slavery, tell both sides of slavery.

Not just the horrors of slavery.

But the miracle of those who were white. Who stood up, and tried to stop it!

Tell the story about how our Founders sent out an armada. This was 18- -- early 1800s.

We sent out an armada. Because we stopped the slave trade in America.

We said, there's no more slave trade. If you're born here, then that's fine.

But it was a compromise.

It was a progressive move. Take it a little bit at a time.

And so what they did, because the slave trade was still going on.

We -- our Navy sent ships off the coast of Africa.

And they were there for -- I don't want to say. Because I will get this wrong.

Somebody fact-check me.

But a long time.

And all they were doing was, if there were slave ships that were coming out.

They would turn around and say, go back to Africa. Okay?

Do you even know that story?

Do you know the story about our Pilgrims, arresting the captain.

Our Pilgrims, arresting the captain of a slave ship. And then taking up a collection amongst themselves, restocking that ship, with -- with more food, cleaning it up, taking everybody out of chains, hiring a new captain with their poor people. With their money!

And sending them back home to Africa. Do you know that story? Why? Why isn't our museum telling that story? I absolutely want the story of -- of slavery told. But I want it to be told in context.

And it's not the story of America!

It is one of the stories of America. That thank God, we fought -- we're the only country en masse. Where one race of people fought and tied for the freedom of the -- of another race of people.

We're the only ones!

So please. Give it a rest. So dishonest. So dishonest.

Russia-Ukraine War Talks: Why the Deep State Needs Trump to FAIL | Glenn TV | Ep 453

From the Alaska summit with Putin to the peace talks with Zelenskyy and EU leaders at the White House, Trump has been diligently working to resolve the conflicts left by the Obama and Biden administrations. Progress toward ending the Russia-Ukraine war appears within reach, but could the deep state sabotage President Trump’s plans? The Democrats and media seemed intent on undermining these efforts from the start. Glenn Beck reveals declassified documents that prove they knew the Russia collusion narrative would harm U.S.-Russia relations. Yet they risked escalating tensions, even to the point of war — to oppose and weaken Trump. Now, unable to back down, they are actively working to derail Trump’s efforts to broker peace. Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy (R) joins to give the inside story of the historic Trump-Putin meeting, the real reason for the B-2 bomber flyover, and the truly effective way Europe can stand with Ukraine.

PragerU CEO EXPOSES How Woke Indoctrination Replaced Real Education

American parents are waking up to a shocking reality: many of today’s teachers can’t pass even the most basic civics or literacy tests, yet they’re in charge of shaping the next generation. In this eye-opening conversation, Glenn Beck sits down with PragerU CEO to expose how woke indoctrination has infiltrated our schools — with educators who can’t define what a boy or girl is, but are more than eager to push radical ideology onto your kids. From absurd test failures to the Marxist training happening in teacher colleges, this episode reveals why so many parents no longer trust the education system. Are America’s classrooms turning into indoctrination centers instead of places of learning? The answer will shock you.

Watch Glenn Beck's Extended Interview with PragerU CEO Marissa Streit HERE