RADIOOctober 17, 2022

Glenn: Economy is like the TITANIC. Time to get on a lifeboat.

Glenn says our economy today is like the Titanic — saving it before massive destruction is done might not be an option any longer. And, unfortunately, financial expert and author of ‘The War On Small Business,’ Carol Roth, agrees. She tells Glenn what SHE would do differently if she was running the Federal Reserve: ’I [would] slow the Titanic down so we can get people into the lifeboats.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Carol Roth is in town. We have a -- kind of a financial kind of meeting. Or something today.

And you're in town for that. And welcome as always, Carol.

CAROL: Thanks, it's fun to be in studio, with you.

GLENN: So, Carol, I just said to Senator Johnson from Wisconsin.

That I feel like we're on the Titanic, and now we've hit the iceberg at full speed. And I'm looking for a band to stop playing so people can go, oh, wait. What just happened? And it's time to get into the lifeboats. Because this thing -- we have to save what we can. And the people we can. Because we're going to have a lot of rebuilding to do.

CAROL: Yeah. And it's the people who put us on course to hit the iceberg.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. You don't agree with my analogy, do you?

CAROL: No. I do agree. I'm very, very sorry. I know, you want me to tell you that everything is going to be okay.

GLENN: Yeah. Blame the iceberg, we haven't --

CAROL: We'll be on a mega yacht, instead of the Titanic. But it's just not the case. It is these people who said, no. That iceberg is not there. No. We can totally maneuver our way around it. These are the people who say, no, no, no. Yeah. So it was there. And maybe we hit it.

But, you know, that was some other reason. It wasn't actually there when we saw it. But now we've got all these great ideas on how to fix the economy.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. And none of them are good ideas. Let me ask you this. Let's say you're the head of the Treasury. Or head of the fed.

CAROL: Lord, help everyone. But yes.

GLENN: I think we would be better off.

CAROL: Oh, you would be. You would be.

GLENN: Even if it was just me. It would be like --

CAROL: Some guy off the street.

GLENN: Anybody off the street. You, I don't know what your name is, you're now the head of the fed.

If you were the head of the fed, this is the iceberg part, how do you stop this from going down?

Aren't -- because you have to raise interest rates, traditionally, to pull money back in. But these interest rates would have to be 30 percent easy. Don't you agree, to pull this kind of money back in? We were at 20 at Jimmy Carter.

CAROL: Yeah, we'll get to that in a second. First of all, if I were fed chair, I would blow up the fed powers. And say, we're going to put myself out of a job, at some point in time. But in terms of the problem at hand --

GLENN: So wait. Wait. Let me get this. So the audience understands. To suck -- inflation goes down, when you suck money back out of the system.

That's the theory. And that's the way it always works. Hang on. I know what you're thinking. And the other problem is, you can only make interest rates, go so high, before it sucks the money out, that is needed to run the economy.

So a half the country is saying, we have to our interest rates. Other half of the country, is saying, no. We have to lower the interest rates. I don't know what to do. Except just freeze.

CAROL: So let me put this in layman's terms. You're talking about this battle between inflation and putting us into a very deep recession. Not that we're not already in a recession. Which some of the people like to pretend that we're not. But a very deep recession. And some of those things are at odds with each other.

GLENN: Borderline depression. I mean depression is really kind of defined by the unemployment being very, very high. Over 25 percent.

CAROL: And duration. The length of -- how deep and how long this goes. But there's another factor in here, which is because we are the world's reserve currency, it's something called the Triffin dilemma. So not only are we domestically at odds, inflation versus recession.

But on a global -- from a global standpoint, you're at odds. Do you make decisions for the benefit of the US? Which I'm not sure that we can. But let's just pretend that maybe we can.

Or for the world. Because the world is on the precipice of a massive global recession, that could do cause all kinds of very reverberations here.

So this is the massive puzzle that the central planners, again, have created. Because they thought, okay. We can figure this out. But they don't realize, they're not smart enough to figure out all these parts. So as fed chair, I need to slow the Titanic down, so we can get people -- we talked about online, into the lifeboats, versus not crashing into the iceberg. Because that's not possible at this point in time.

GLENN: It's not possible to save the Titanic?

CAROL: I personally don't think that's possible. Everybody is like, oh, there's a very narrow path. The path is as narrow as one of my hairs. There's no narrow path, so let's just be honest about it.

GLENN: Right. The time to do something was really before 2008. Once we went down the path of bailing everybody out, this is the inevitable outcome. And everybody at the fed and all the experts and all the banking people, said, no, no, no. You don't understand. And I kept saying to them, hmm. I do understand. I don't think you're either telling the truth to yourself, or you're -- you're -- or you're just a crazy man. Because they're -- you can't do this, at the numbers that we're doing it.

CAROL: Yeah. And the thing is, that not only have they not done what they did then. They shouldn't have kept in place, for as long as they have. And they shouldn't have doubled down. That's the problem. Is we keep having these opportunities. Yes, we've made mistakes, and we're going to change course. But instead, everyone goes, no, I think this is fine. We're going to continue to march down. Or I'm not seeing the problem in the way that other people are anticipating it. So since you're not recognizing it, we have some more room to just continue on, until they wake up, and realize, it's a problem. Once you wake up and realize that the problem is there, then it becomes too late. And we're in the situation that we're in today.

GLENN: So Monday, I did a monologue on Credit Suisse, and I said, you're going to see in two years. Because the fed doesn't have to tell you anything in two years. But I guarantee you, we're sending over our money over to Credit Suisse right now, to do basically what we did in 2008. Save the baggage that's too big to fail. Well, I don't know why they released this information. But last night, I'm reading, we sent three -- billion? How much did we say?

CAROL: I don't know, but I doubt it was 3 trillion.

GLENN: Yeah. I'll look that up. Could you look that up?

STU: 3 trillion --

CAROL: That would be bad.

GLENN: It's a staggering -- it's a staggering amount.

CAROL: Let me tell you why they did that: Is because the Suisse National Bank said that Credit Suisse is a systemically important bank. So, of course, they are too big to fail. You know, we can't bail out the little guys. We have to make sure the big cronies are taken care of. So, of course, somebody was going to come to the rescue. And when you say somebody, it's always the US. And it's not the US. It's you and you and you. It's literally us because it's our money, or the printing money, which devalues our money.

GLENN: So isn't Europe now in the place, or soon to be in the place that we were at in 2008?

CAROL: So it's for a different reason.

GLENN: Right. Right. Right. Right.

CAROL: But, again, this goes back to the fed. So let's tie this back in a little bow. Because we have a dollar that is strong against other currencies. It's not strong when you go to the grocery store.

But it's strong against these other currencies out there. I like to call it the skinniest kid at fat camp.

It's not great, but it's the best out of all of them. And because of the energy situation, that they've all created.

They're dependent on importing energy. Energy, and to some extent, food is priced in dollars, which means that these countries need to access dollars in order to pay for these things. So they only have so many choices.

It means they either continue to devalue their currency. They're going too have to spend more and more of their currency to buy dollars. Or they sell dollar denominated assets like treasuries, in order to get the dollars to pay. So this is a vicious cycle, when they do that. Then the yields go up. The dollar strengthens, and we end up in this crazy cycle again. And this is why it's so complicated, the fed's decision isn't just inflation versus, you know, a deeper recession here in the US. It's literally, potentially creating a global currency crisis. It's potentially creating a liquidity in the Treasury market, and a crisis there. It's potentially, you know, all risk assets, could end up just, you know, being sold in a massive fire sale. I mean, they have to think through all of those implications. And that's why, if I were fed chair right now, where we started this, I would have to pause. Because I don't think that the fed has the tools to combat inflation since their supply-generated anyway. They can't print oil. They can't print labor. They don't have the tools. So all they can do is crash demand, and if they do, they take the whole world down with them.

GLENN: Okay. Well, I think I'm going home now. All right. More in just a second with Carol Roth. By the way, you can get her newsletter and the things that she writes, at Blaze. TheBlaze.com. You'll see a lot of her articles. And at your website, as well.

CarolRoth.com/Glenn. Right?

CAROL: That's actually a new project coming up that you know about. They can sign up to find out about that there. It will help them battle their way back with wealth. So CarolRoth.com/Glenn.

GLENN: So you're going to announce that today?

CAROL: I'm not announcing it. But if they get on that mailing list, they'll be the first one to know.

GLENN: This is a really good thing. All right.

Let me tell you about gold. I actually saw a guy who was traditionally against holding gold. And I don't remember who it was. It was a guy traditionally against it. And he said, now it's really the time. Now is the time. Because all assets, all assets are going to go way down. He predicted. Way down. And even if gold goes dune. It will be like the skinniest kid at fat camp. You know what I mean? And he said, eventually, gold always resets everything. Do you agree with that?

CAROL: Yeah. We can talk about this more. But if you think about what we just said, the fed eventually having to go back to continue printing. The central banks going back to printing. Like we're seeing in the Bank of England. You know, this is a long-term trend. You saw something out of Saudi Arabia. That they're opening a gold refinery. There's a reason for that. So just in terms of the tenor of the global economy, U.S. dollar's reserve currency, and all these machinations going on with it. You know, the one thing that everybody can kind of agree on is gold.

GLENN: You know, it's amazing too, because if you think the government can say, we're just making a different dollar. We're just making a digital dollar. It's going to be completely different. At that point, no one is going to have any credibility. You're going to have to show me what's that worth. Show it to me. There will be no faith in the good name and credit of the United States. Anyway, I want you to call Goldline right now.

They've got a a really good special outgoing. The legal tender bar. This is goodly pieces, I actually helped design this. And they had it made by the Canadian mint. It is little, teeny gold bars that are spendable if you will. You can keep it in your wallet, and you can get wherever you needed to do with those. And it's much more reasonable to use.

Also, if you do this. You can get a free Benjamin Franklin copper round. Free silver mind your business bar. And a free silver Mapleflex bar, which is exactly like the gold bar. That I was telling you about a minute ago. Inventory on these. They sell out quickly. Don't wait. Call 866GOLDLINE. 866GOLDLINE or goldline.com. Ten-second station ID.
(music)
Can you explain one thing?

I saw an article out of Europe. And it said that because there are no investors. Because of ESG.

CAROL: Right.

GLENN: There's no investors in exploring for oil. Et cetera, et cetera.

And the fact that we are headed towards price destruction.

Meaning, nobody can afford to do anything.

So nobody is going to be using gas.

And you're going to be staying home. So the price of gas, is going to fall through the floor, they think. Then the banks will have. Or any investors will have a call, on their investment. And they won't have the money, to be able to do it. So a they're stuck in this same kind of trap. Where it's this vicious circle. Is that true? Is that right?

CAROL: So there is a case to be made, that, you know, as we -- kind of go into a global recession.

Like a very deep global recession that there will be demand destruction.

But you have to remember, that we just had OPEC plus, decide to cut production to a million barrels per day. So -- and, you know, China is still kind of getting back and running. You know, in terms of capacity. So I don't think that oil and gas are going to go back up to the levels that, you know, perhaps we saw earlier this year. But the idea that it's all going to come crashing down. Yes.

Europe is stockpiled on gas. But it's a three-month stockpile. Like, what happens after that? This issue that we have with energy. This isn't like a month-long, or winter long issue. And all of a sudden, we're going to come out the other side, and everything is going to be roses.

There's massive underinvestment that will affect us for years.

GLENN: So it's not just that you can turn this spigot back on. You know, I know, when you think of these big oil rigs, that are out in the middle of the gulf. Those things are made here. A lot of them.

But they have specialized parts that like, one company makes. Those things are on leases for ten years, at least.

So if it pulls up here, and goes some other place, South America. That's leased. And you don't just build an oil rig like that, overnight.

We're talking years of restarting.

CAROL: This sounds really familiar. It sounds like in 2020, when a bunch of people said, wait. You can't just turn on a third of the economy. And turn it back on whenever you want. And there's going to be absolutely no dislocation. Huh. That's weird. It's the same thing here. You're losing -- the parts manufacture. You're losing, in the case of nuclear -- knowledge base. You know, specialized expertise. You cannot just flip the switch back on. And there's no meaningful, sort of rush towards investment. Because all these companies believe that, you know, whoever the next regime is, even if there's a friendly one in between. That they're just going to double down on these bad policies. So why would they make a ten-year, a 15-year, multi-billion dollar investment. When people are coming out and saying, we're coming after you. You know, show me the incentive. I will show you the outcome, that's Charlie Munger. And it's for every single thing. In terms of energy, this is not just the next few months. This is a multi -- multi year disaster, with massive human suffering. I mean, we're talking about already in Europe. Just the implications, not just on heating your homes. But on the food sector. Bakeries. Dairy.

Companies that massively use energy. They're not able to produce, at the levels, that they could, because the energy --

GLENN: Farms.

CAROL: Yeah. Fertilizer. This is what happened to Sri Lanka, right?

GLENN: This is craziness. It is craziness. There is such a -- and I can only -- you know, it's Malthusian.

You have to hate humankind, to go down this road. Because it's so clear, what the ramifications are.

And if you stop right now, and you go, okay. Okay. Okay. Okay.

All right. I got it. That's one thing. But to stay singly focused on this, and continue, while people are going to face starvation and freezing to death, there's something deeply, deeply wrong with you.

CAROL: So we've talked about this. This is what the fed did. They stayed with that myopia. Same thing with covid. Now we have it with energy.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.