RADIOJuly 23, 2025

Hunter Biden admits CRAZY reason he wants illegals in America

Hunter Biden recently went on a bizarre, profanity-laden rant on the podcast “Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan” about everything from Democrats to President Trump’s deportation program. But his reason for wanting illegal immigrants in America was absolutely INSANE! Glenn Beck comments on this admission, as well as Hunter’s take on his father Joe Biden’s disastrous 2024 presidential debate.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me talk to you a little bit about Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden is on a podcast, called channel five, with Andrew Callahan.

Now, I don't pretend to be up on the latest podcasts. But this is a show. I mean, I am -- I applaud his creativity.

I applaud his -- his nod to the past. In channel five. Has anybody watched this show?

I mean, how many views does it get, do you know, Stu?

STU: So I'm looking at this. I don't know this person that he's talking about.

This is me just looking at it, as we speak. I does seem like he has several million YouTube followers, so relatively big audience.

GLENN: Relatively big audience.

STU: Seemingly was -- so I think built a very big audience, then had what I would maybe say is a Me Too scandal.

GLENN: Okay.

STU: And had things kind of -- alcoholism.

Maybe things sort of fall apart for a while.

This is maybe -- and it came back.

GLENN: Good for him.

Good for him.

STU: Yeah. I don't know if it's good for him.

It doesn't seem like he's a hard-core leftist. But leans to the left.

GLENN: Good for him.

If he's an alcoholic. Had a crash. And he found a way to claw his way back out.

STU: You shouldn't be excited for him, on the left.

I was trying to give a full perspective of who he was.

GLENN: Yeah. So, anyway, so he was the one that did this Hunter Biden.

And it is absolutely and completely bizarre.

But what -- I mean, what else would you expect from -- from Hunter Biden?

Let me -- let's see.

Where should we start here, Stu?

Let's --

STU: It's all good, Glenn.

There's no wrong place to start with these clips.

GLENN: Okay. Let's start here. Let's start here.

Cut six. Hunter Biden on migrants.

VOICE: All these Democrats say, you have to talk about, and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration.

(bleep) you. How do you think your hotel room gets clean? How do you think you have food on your (bleep) table.

Who do you think washes your dishes?

Who do you think does your fucking garden?

Who do you think is here by the (bleep) sheer just grit and will, that they figured out a way to get here. Because they thought they could give themselves and their family a better chance.

And he was somehow convinced all of us, that these people are the criminals?

White men in America are 45 more times likely to commit a violent crime than a Democrat.

The media is saying as well. Well, you have David Axelrod. And Rahm fucking Emanuel. Because we got to understand that these people are really mad.

GLENN: Oh. Sorry. We missed -- did we catch that in time?

STU: Yes. We did. Sorry, there's 847 F-bombs in there.

GLENN: Yeah. And we missed one. But you get the picture here of what he's talking about.
This one view I absolutely love. I absolutely love the fact that Democrats will take the point of view, that this is who cleans the hotel room. This is who washes your dishes. This is who you have, pick your food.

Like, I mean --

STU: I love it.

GLENN: The Democratic slogan should be, Democrats, helping you have cheap food since 1810.
(laughter)

STU: They've had this policy the whole time.

GLENN: They fought for it in the 1850s and '60s! We want cheap labor! I mean, it's crazy!

STU: It is hilarious. And coming from him.

Like who cleaned your hotel room? Considering what he's done to hotel rooms, I hope nobody. I hope he burns them down to the ground after he exits them. I don't know. Who takes all the bodily fluid out of the carpet fibers, Hunter? What are you thinking?

Oh, it's illegal immigrants.

We have to have them here, to clean the meth dust off the cabinets.

GLENN: Because it gives them dignity.

STU: Yes, I love it! This guy.

GLENN: Who is in there with the black light, trying to make sure they get every bit of soil out of the walls and everything else after I've been in? The legal immigrants.

STU: I -- I -- as I do, I hope, the host of the program has no more Me Too, you know, failings.

And has its -- alcoholism go away.

I, of course, also --

GLENN: Alcoholism never goes away. I hate to be that guy. But go ahead.

STU: Yes. Yes.

There you go.

I hope he keeps it in remission, we will say.

And the same thing for Hunter. Though, I -- watching this interview, I -- I am starting to doubt whether he's going to be able to keep it in remission.

And maybe directly from a crackhouse.

GLENN: Yeah. I'm not sure he is in control, still.

That he's still in remission.

GLENN: Just looking at this, it seems he's back on crack.

That's just me. I'm not on the crackhouse with him.

No, I have evidence to support that complete belief.

GLENN: Just the crackhouse on the way to the interview.

STU: My impression is that in between the clips that we're watching, he's smoking crack.

That's my impression of the interview.

GLENN: Okay. All right.

STU: I'm just putting that out there.

That's allegedly. Not even, it's just an impression.

GLENN: All right. We have a quick commercial, that we want to share with you, from the democratic party.

STU: Oh.

GLENN: Go ahead. Roll it.

VOICE: To the hands that scrubbed my 7-bedroom DC home for $4 an hour so I don't have to, thank you.

To the hands that flip burgers to keep Americans fat and stupid so they'll keep voting for me, thank you.

And to the hands that smuggle cocaine into the country for the cartels, thank you! And Hunter Biden says, he's especially grateful.

To the hands that build our bridges, hurry the (bleep) up, my constituents have been waiting for this since 2023. And to the hands that clean the hotel, where I host Chinese businessmen for top secret meetings, thank you. I couldn't survive without your cheap labor.

I mean, we could -- the market would just raise wages. But if we can just take advantage of you, and secure more votes at the same time, why not?

GLENN: Right. Right.

STU: That's a great message.

GLENN: Vote for the Democrats.

I just -- it kills me.

STU: It is a really strange argument to be the humane side of the -- of the discussion. Right?

Like, that is how the media portrays it.

Like, we're the bad ones for saying, hey. You shouldn't be exploited.

You had been come across the border.

You shouldn't have coyotes bring you across the border.

And put you into essential slavery.

GLENN: And they could say, well, we want them to be illegal citizens.

No, you don't.

Because then they won't be cheap labor.
They won't be cheap!

STU: Well, they'll vote for them.
So I think they're conflicted on that.

GLENN: But it kills me.

Who is picking your food?

What you know the price of everything would be, if they didn't -- so you are for slavery.

We are negotiating the price. That's all we're doing here.

STU: Yes. That's the fact.

GLENN: It is. It clearly is.

By the way, you were talking about Biden and crack cocaine. Here he is, defending creak cocaine. Cut eight.

STU: It's actually great.

VOICE: The only difference between crack cocaine and cocaine is sodium bicarbonate and water and heat, literally. That's it.

VOICE: That's it.

VOICE: Those things are pretty much free if you go to a science store.

VOICE: Free. You can go to your neighborhood convenience store, and just get -- anyway, I don't want to tell people, how to make crack cocaine, but it literally is. Cocaine and baking soda.

VOICE: How difference is the experience?

VOICE: Oh, it's vastly, vastly different.

For real. I feel really reluctant to kind of have some euphoric suggestion.

I know you're not asking me to do that. Have some euphoric discussion about crack cocaine.

VOICE: No. It's kind of the opposite here.
VOICE: No, it's the exact opposite.

I'm saying I don't want to have the experience of some euphoric recall. That's how powerful crack cocaine is. Does crack cocaine make you act any differently? No. Is it safer than alcohol?

Probably. People think of crack as being dirty. It's the exact opposite.

When you're making crack, what you're doing is burning off all the impurities. So that it is refines the sodium bicarbonate which makes it smoke more. That's all.

GLENN: Oh!

VOICE: You know, all of these actors, and people in the past. That talked about, they had a problem with cocaine. And free -- they're smoking crack.

VOICE: The straw on the stove, is the same thing?

VOICE: Not exactly. But close to it.

But it's a little bit different.

GLENN: What kind of conversation is this?

What world do I live in?

The former president's son talking about, you know, I don't want -- I don't want to make a case for crack cocaine. Let me make a case for crack cocaine.

STU: It's better than alcohol.

GLENN: I made it myself.

Just go to your 7-Eleven. What are you doing?

STU: You know, I was thinking Applebee's.

It should be serving crack more than margaritas.

GLENN: It's a lot safer.

It doesn't change your behavior at all.

Really? Really?

STU: It seems -- also, it's like -- I feel like the crack people, wait a minute. Yes, it does.

It absolutely does.

No one will buy our stuff.

GLENN: It doesn't have a brand. So they don't have lawyers.

I mean, if they had a brand and a trademark.

It was made crack by Pfizer.

They would be saying that, but they're not now.

All right. Back in just a second. Let me tell you about Ruff Greens. Imagine this. You wake up in the morning. You head to the kitchen. You pour yourself a big, heaping bowl of Styrofoam packing peanuts. Yummy!

Now, I mean, be honest. You would think you would walk out the door with pep in your step. Right?

Glide in your stride. Because you had the packing peanuts. You were cheated out of a real breakfast. Cheated out of real nutrition.

There's nothing in there.

And if you're feeding your dog a typical kibble diet. That's almost what you're doing. Because kibble is dead food. It's cooked at very high temperatures to kill everything that is good and alive in that. So it can sit on a shelf, for two years.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Then it's left to sit in that bag. There's nothing left. Your dog's body can really use some help. That's why I recommend Ruff Greens.

It's a powdered supplement, you sprinkle on top of your dog's food, loaded with probiotics.

Enzymes. This has been a very tough half-hour. Get a free jump-start trial bag for your dog today. It's a 20-dollar value. But you get it for free. Just cover the shipping.

Go to RuffGreens.com, or call them at 214-RUFF-DOG. That's 214-R-U-F-F-DOG. Use the promo code beck. RuffGreens.com. Promo code Beck.
(music)

Ten seconds.
(music)
Oh, okay.

Hello, Stu.

STU: Hey, Glenn. How is it going? Do you doo any crack today?

GLENN: I might have.

I just didn't know. Hey, it doesn't. It's better than alcohol.

STU: And it does not change your behavior. The number one thing, you need to know about crack is it does not change your behavior.

GLENN: Why would you take it, if it didn't change your behavior?

STU: Well, I think maybe it makes you feel better.

Again, this is not true.

In theory, if you had a thing that made you feel better but didn't change your behavior, that would be impossible.

GLENN: It would change your behavior. Because you feel better.

For instance, let's say you have really bad -- your legs are just riddled with arthritis. So they give you an opioid.

So you can deal with the pain.

Well, it changes your behavior.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Because you're not feeling the pain as much.

So you're like, I can do that. All right?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Crack cocaine. I can fly off the roof.

STU: Right.

GLENN: They will change your behavior, one way or another.

STU: Once you learn to master it though, it just makes you a better tipper to the prostitutes.

GLENN: Really? Now, I agree, for instance, alcohol.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Doesn't --

GLENN: Alcoholism doesn't really change your behavior at first.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: At first.

It just makes you more honest.

STU: Right.

GLENN: If you're -- if you're an angry person underneath. You're going to be a very angry drunk. Okay?

If you're just a -- oh, I love you, kind of person.

That's what you turn into. Until the alcoholism part of it gets a hold of you, and then it owns you. And then you change your behavior. Because you're lying to everybody.

But at first, alcohol just loosens you up to be more of who you really are. Underneath. And takes away all of your inhibitions.

STU: That's what it's known for. Taking away your inhibitions. That tends to be negative after a while.

GLENN: And if you don't think that you would not sleep with somebody that you would really, really regret the next day, I would say, that's proof positive, alcohol changes your behavior.

STU: Beer goggles principle.

GLENN: Beer goggles. You wake up, like, what have I done?

That's changing your behavior.

STU: Yes. All of these substances change your behavior.

By the way, we think --

GLENN: By the way, what he's saying here is, I am that bad guy that sleeps with prostitutes.

STU: Again --

GLENN: He's a horrible guy.

STU: There's some truth spoken here.

But I will say, overwhelming the Whitney principle of crack being whack. It's not something we need to do in this country. It's still whack. Please believe it's whack. Don't listen to Hunter Biden.

Okay. Here's something else he said.

I want to play cut 12 first.

This is a flashback to his father, on the 2024 debate stage. Listen.

BIDEN: What's happening? I've changed in a way that now, we're in a situation where 40 percent fewer people are coming across the border illegally. It's better than when he left office. It's continuing to move until we get the total ban -- the total initiative, relative to what we're going to do with more Border Patrol. And more asylum officers.

VOICE: President Trump.

TRUMP: I really don't know what he said. I don't think he knows what he said either.

STU: That's the best moment of that debate.

GLENN: It's the best moment of any debate of all time.

Okay. So, remember, that's who he's talking about.

Listen to what Hunter Biden said about that moment. Cut 13.

VOICE: He knew exactly what happened in that debate. He flew around the world. Basically, the mileage that he could have flown around the world three times. He's 81 years old. He's tired as (bleep). Give him an Ambien to get to sleep. He gets on the stage and then looks like he's a deer in the headlights.

STU: Wait.

GLENN: Wait. They gave him Ambien?

I mean, we were all talking about maybe crack cocaine, to keep him peppy. You know what I mean?

You wouldn't be like, he's got a debate. How can we get him to perform at his best, most clear, Ambien.

STU: Yeah. And, well, crack wouldn't make sense.

Because it doesn't change your behavior.

But Ambien does.

So crack is now less potent than Ambien. Which is a fascinating development.

Well, I mean, I guess if you want to be super kind to his comments.

Is he saying, essentially like, he didn't get a lot of sleep. He had to get that to sleep through the night. They're not saying that they gave it to him before the debate, are they?

GLENN: If you remember right, Rick Perry had just gotten out of back surgery. And they had him on -- I don't know. Oxicoden or whatever.

And he was at the debate. And he's like, I've got to take the painkillers. It's killing me.

Or I won't make it standing here the whole time. He takes it. He makes one mistake. Nobody says, the guy just got out of back surgery.

STU: Right.

GLENN: I mean, really? He was on Ambien. Well, those are poor choices.

STU: And the other part about this.

Because they have tried the beginning of that excuse before, which was, he was flying all around the worlds.

And he did have a trip.

But it was several days before the debate.

He got back, like before the debate.

It wases like he landed and went to the studios.

Right?

GLENN: Right expect Trump had to be doing.

STU: Trump --

GLENN: Trump does it all the time.

STU: He has energy no matter what.

It's just a ridiculous excuse.

If you can't own the debate being bad.

How can anyone trust you on your opinion on crack changing your behavior.

I feel like he's not even all that reliable.

Even on crack.

GLENN: Right.

STU: That's the one thing he knows a lot about.

GLENN: You are so right, Stu.

STU: Gosh, so disappointing.

GLENN: Now, back to his dad. Why did the Dems lose? Cut nine!

VOICE: I will tell you, why we lost the last election.

We lost the last election. Because we did want remain loyal to the leader of the party.

That's my position.

We had the advantage of an incumbency. We had the advantage of an incredibly successful administration.

STU: Stop.

VOICE: And the Democratic Party literally melted down.

GLENN: Wait.

STU: No. They melted down, because everything was going terribly.

Then their guy got on stage. And almost fell over in the middle of a debate. Ambien or no Ambien, it's over at that point.

STU: Right. I mean, it's not an indefensible point to say that what they did to get rid of him was terrible.

GLENN: No, it was a coup!

I would go further. What they did is most likely illegal and unconstitutional.

STU: Maybe. I think --

GLENN: Well, they did the movie from Office.

STU: Right. They didn't remove him from office. And he -- they did go through a process. Again, they made the process up.

They're the Democrats. It's their own party. They can choose whoever they want. They don't to have let anyone vote.

GLENN: Oh, they won't. At some point.

STU: Yeah, they're working back toward that right now. So I don't know --

GLENN: For a good portion of the people. Not voting. Democrat since 1810.
(laughter)

STU: They have a great couple of slogans.

GLENN: We do. We got a couple of shirts, that I think need to be made.

STU: I do -- I -- the change to Harris, I think probably helped them in the actual election results. I think they probably held a Senate seat, maybe.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

STU: That they would have lost.

I think they may have won. You know, I think they were closer than they would have been if Biden were the candidate.

But that being said, you -- they destroyed any credibility, they had to their voters, by allowing them to elect a person and then forcing them out. And there has to be a price to pay for that, I think long-term.

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.