RADIOJuly 23, 2025

Hunter Biden admits CRAZY reason he wants illegals in America

Hunter Biden recently went on a bizarre, profanity-laden rant on the podcast “Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan” about everything from Democrats to President Trump’s deportation program. But his reason for wanting illegal immigrants in America was absolutely INSANE! Glenn Beck comments on this admission, as well as Hunter’s take on his father Joe Biden’s disastrous 2024 presidential debate.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me talk to you a little bit about Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden is on a podcast, called channel five, with Andrew Callahan.

Now, I don't pretend to be up on the latest podcasts. But this is a show. I mean, I am -- I applaud his creativity.

I applaud his -- his nod to the past. In channel five. Has anybody watched this show?

I mean, how many views does it get, do you know, Stu?

STU: So I'm looking at this. I don't know this person that he's talking about.

This is me just looking at it, as we speak. I does seem like he has several million YouTube followers, so relatively big audience.

GLENN: Relatively big audience.

STU: Seemingly was -- so I think built a very big audience, then had what I would maybe say is a Me Too scandal.

GLENN: Okay.

STU: And had things kind of -- alcoholism.

Maybe things sort of fall apart for a while.

This is maybe -- and it came back.

GLENN: Good for him.

Good for him.

STU: Yeah. I don't know if it's good for him.

It doesn't seem like he's a hard-core leftist. But leans to the left.

GLENN: Good for him.

If he's an alcoholic. Had a crash. And he found a way to claw his way back out.

STU: You shouldn't be excited for him, on the left.

I was trying to give a full perspective of who he was.

GLENN: Yeah. So, anyway, so he was the one that did this Hunter Biden.

And it is absolutely and completely bizarre.

But what -- I mean, what else would you expect from -- from Hunter Biden?

Let me -- let's see.

Where should we start here, Stu?

Let's --

STU: It's all good, Glenn.

There's no wrong place to start with these clips.

GLENN: Okay. Let's start here. Let's start here.

Cut six. Hunter Biden on migrants.

VOICE: All these Democrats say, you have to talk about, and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration.

(bleep) you. How do you think your hotel room gets clean? How do you think you have food on your (bleep) table.

Who do you think washes your dishes?

Who do you think does your fucking garden?

Who do you think is here by the (bleep) sheer just grit and will, that they figured out a way to get here. Because they thought they could give themselves and their family a better chance.

And he was somehow convinced all of us, that these people are the criminals?

White men in America are 45 more times likely to commit a violent crime than a Democrat.

The media is saying as well. Well, you have David Axelrod. And Rahm fucking Emanuel. Because we got to understand that these people are really mad.

GLENN: Oh. Sorry. We missed -- did we catch that in time?

STU: Yes. We did. Sorry, there's 847 F-bombs in there.

GLENN: Yeah. And we missed one. But you get the picture here of what he's talking about.
This one view I absolutely love. I absolutely love the fact that Democrats will take the point of view, that this is who cleans the hotel room. This is who washes your dishes. This is who you have, pick your food.

Like, I mean --

STU: I love it.

GLENN: The Democratic slogan should be, Democrats, helping you have cheap food since 1810.
(laughter)

STU: They've had this policy the whole time.

GLENN: They fought for it in the 1850s and '60s! We want cheap labor! I mean, it's crazy!

STU: It is hilarious. And coming from him.

Like who cleaned your hotel room? Considering what he's done to hotel rooms, I hope nobody. I hope he burns them down to the ground after he exits them. I don't know. Who takes all the bodily fluid out of the carpet fibers, Hunter? What are you thinking?

Oh, it's illegal immigrants.

We have to have them here, to clean the meth dust off the cabinets.

GLENN: Because it gives them dignity.

STU: Yes, I love it! This guy.

GLENN: Who is in there with the black light, trying to make sure they get every bit of soil out of the walls and everything else after I've been in? The legal immigrants.

STU: I -- I -- as I do, I hope, the host of the program has no more Me Too, you know, failings.

And has its -- alcoholism go away.

I, of course, also --

GLENN: Alcoholism never goes away. I hate to be that guy. But go ahead.

STU: Yes. Yes.

There you go.

I hope he keeps it in remission, we will say.

And the same thing for Hunter. Though, I -- watching this interview, I -- I am starting to doubt whether he's going to be able to keep it in remission.

And maybe directly from a crackhouse.

GLENN: Yeah. I'm not sure he is in control, still.

That he's still in remission.

GLENN: Just looking at this, it seems he's back on crack.

That's just me. I'm not on the crackhouse with him.

No, I have evidence to support that complete belief.

GLENN: Just the crackhouse on the way to the interview.

STU: My impression is that in between the clips that we're watching, he's smoking crack.

That's my impression of the interview.

GLENN: Okay. All right.

STU: I'm just putting that out there.

That's allegedly. Not even, it's just an impression.

GLENN: All right. We have a quick commercial, that we want to share with you, from the democratic party.

STU: Oh.

GLENN: Go ahead. Roll it.

VOICE: To the hands that scrubbed my 7-bedroom DC home for $4 an hour so I don't have to, thank you.

To the hands that flip burgers to keep Americans fat and stupid so they'll keep voting for me, thank you.

And to the hands that smuggle cocaine into the country for the cartels, thank you! And Hunter Biden says, he's especially grateful.

To the hands that build our bridges, hurry the (bleep) up, my constituents have been waiting for this since 2023. And to the hands that clean the hotel, where I host Chinese businessmen for top secret meetings, thank you. I couldn't survive without your cheap labor.

I mean, we could -- the market would just raise wages. But if we can just take advantage of you, and secure more votes at the same time, why not?

GLENN: Right. Right.

STU: That's a great message.

GLENN: Vote for the Democrats.

I just -- it kills me.

STU: It is a really strange argument to be the humane side of the -- of the discussion. Right?

Like, that is how the media portrays it.

Like, we're the bad ones for saying, hey. You shouldn't be exploited.

You had been come across the border.

You shouldn't have coyotes bring you across the border.

And put you into essential slavery.

GLENN: And they could say, well, we want them to be illegal citizens.

No, you don't.

Because then they won't be cheap labor.
They won't be cheap!

STU: Well, they'll vote for them.
So I think they're conflicted on that.

GLENN: But it kills me.

Who is picking your food?

What you know the price of everything would be, if they didn't -- so you are for slavery.

We are negotiating the price. That's all we're doing here.

STU: Yes. That's the fact.

GLENN: It is. It clearly is.

By the way, you were talking about Biden and crack cocaine. Here he is, defending creak cocaine. Cut eight.

STU: It's actually great.

VOICE: The only difference between crack cocaine and cocaine is sodium bicarbonate and water and heat, literally. That's it.

VOICE: That's it.

VOICE: Those things are pretty much free if you go to a science store.

VOICE: Free. You can go to your neighborhood convenience store, and just get -- anyway, I don't want to tell people, how to make crack cocaine, but it literally is. Cocaine and baking soda.

VOICE: How difference is the experience?

VOICE: Oh, it's vastly, vastly different.

For real. I feel really reluctant to kind of have some euphoric suggestion.

I know you're not asking me to do that. Have some euphoric discussion about crack cocaine.

VOICE: No. It's kind of the opposite here.
VOICE: No, it's the exact opposite.

I'm saying I don't want to have the experience of some euphoric recall. That's how powerful crack cocaine is. Does crack cocaine make you act any differently? No. Is it safer than alcohol?

Probably. People think of crack as being dirty. It's the exact opposite.

When you're making crack, what you're doing is burning off all the impurities. So that it is refines the sodium bicarbonate which makes it smoke more. That's all.

GLENN: Oh!

VOICE: You know, all of these actors, and people in the past. That talked about, they had a problem with cocaine. And free -- they're smoking crack.

VOICE: The straw on the stove, is the same thing?

VOICE: Not exactly. But close to it.

But it's a little bit different.

GLENN: What kind of conversation is this?

What world do I live in?

The former president's son talking about, you know, I don't want -- I don't want to make a case for crack cocaine. Let me make a case for crack cocaine.

STU: It's better than alcohol.

GLENN: I made it myself.

Just go to your 7-Eleven. What are you doing?

STU: You know, I was thinking Applebee's.

It should be serving crack more than margaritas.

GLENN: It's a lot safer.

It doesn't change your behavior at all.

Really? Really?

STU: It seems -- also, it's like -- I feel like the crack people, wait a minute. Yes, it does.

It absolutely does.

No one will buy our stuff.

GLENN: It doesn't have a brand. So they don't have lawyers.

I mean, if they had a brand and a trademark.

It was made crack by Pfizer.

They would be saying that, but they're not now.

All right. Back in just a second. Let me tell you about Ruff Greens. Imagine this. You wake up in the morning. You head to the kitchen. You pour yourself a big, heaping bowl of Styrofoam packing peanuts. Yummy!

Now, I mean, be honest. You would think you would walk out the door with pep in your step. Right?

Glide in your stride. Because you had the packing peanuts. You were cheated out of a real breakfast. Cheated out of real nutrition.

There's nothing in there.

And if you're feeding your dog a typical kibble diet. That's almost what you're doing. Because kibble is dead food. It's cooked at very high temperatures to kill everything that is good and alive in that. So it can sit on a shelf, for two years.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Then it's left to sit in that bag. There's nothing left. Your dog's body can really use some help. That's why I recommend Ruff Greens.

It's a powdered supplement, you sprinkle on top of your dog's food, loaded with probiotics.

Enzymes. This has been a very tough half-hour. Get a free jump-start trial bag for your dog today. It's a 20-dollar value. But you get it for free. Just cover the shipping.

Go to RuffGreens.com, or call them at 214-RUFF-DOG. That's 214-R-U-F-F-DOG. Use the promo code beck. RuffGreens.com. Promo code Beck.
(music)

Ten seconds.
(music)
Oh, okay.

Hello, Stu.

STU: Hey, Glenn. How is it going? Do you doo any crack today?

GLENN: I might have.

I just didn't know. Hey, it doesn't. It's better than alcohol.

STU: And it does not change your behavior. The number one thing, you need to know about crack is it does not change your behavior.

GLENN: Why would you take it, if it didn't change your behavior?

STU: Well, I think maybe it makes you feel better.

Again, this is not true.

In theory, if you had a thing that made you feel better but didn't change your behavior, that would be impossible.

GLENN: It would change your behavior. Because you feel better.

For instance, let's say you have really bad -- your legs are just riddled with arthritis. So they give you an opioid.

So you can deal with the pain.

Well, it changes your behavior.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Because you're not feeling the pain as much.

So you're like, I can do that. All right?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Crack cocaine. I can fly off the roof.

STU: Right.

GLENN: They will change your behavior, one way or another.

STU: Once you learn to master it though, it just makes you a better tipper to the prostitutes.

GLENN: Really? Now, I agree, for instance, alcohol.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Doesn't --

GLENN: Alcoholism doesn't really change your behavior at first.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: At first.

It just makes you more honest.

STU: Right.

GLENN: If you're -- if you're an angry person underneath. You're going to be a very angry drunk. Okay?

If you're just a -- oh, I love you, kind of person.

That's what you turn into. Until the alcoholism part of it gets a hold of you, and then it owns you. And then you change your behavior. Because you're lying to everybody.

But at first, alcohol just loosens you up to be more of who you really are. Underneath. And takes away all of your inhibitions.

STU: That's what it's known for. Taking away your inhibitions. That tends to be negative after a while.

GLENN: And if you don't think that you would not sleep with somebody that you would really, really regret the next day, I would say, that's proof positive, alcohol changes your behavior.

STU: Beer goggles principle.

GLENN: Beer goggles. You wake up, like, what have I done?

That's changing your behavior.

STU: Yes. All of these substances change your behavior.

By the way, we think --

GLENN: By the way, what he's saying here is, I am that bad guy that sleeps with prostitutes.

STU: Again --

GLENN: He's a horrible guy.

STU: There's some truth spoken here.

But I will say, overwhelming the Whitney principle of crack being whack. It's not something we need to do in this country. It's still whack. Please believe it's whack. Don't listen to Hunter Biden.

Okay. Here's something else he said.

I want to play cut 12 first.

This is a flashback to his father, on the 2024 debate stage. Listen.

BIDEN: What's happening? I've changed in a way that now, we're in a situation where 40 percent fewer people are coming across the border illegally. It's better than when he left office. It's continuing to move until we get the total ban -- the total initiative, relative to what we're going to do with more Border Patrol. And more asylum officers.

VOICE: President Trump.

TRUMP: I really don't know what he said. I don't think he knows what he said either.

STU: That's the best moment of that debate.

GLENN: It's the best moment of any debate of all time.

Okay. So, remember, that's who he's talking about.

Listen to what Hunter Biden said about that moment. Cut 13.

VOICE: He knew exactly what happened in that debate. He flew around the world. Basically, the mileage that he could have flown around the world three times. He's 81 years old. He's tired as (bleep). Give him an Ambien to get to sleep. He gets on the stage and then looks like he's a deer in the headlights.

STU: Wait.

GLENN: Wait. They gave him Ambien?

I mean, we were all talking about maybe crack cocaine, to keep him peppy. You know what I mean?

You wouldn't be like, he's got a debate. How can we get him to perform at his best, most clear, Ambien.

STU: Yeah. And, well, crack wouldn't make sense.

Because it doesn't change your behavior.

But Ambien does.

So crack is now less potent than Ambien. Which is a fascinating development.

Well, I mean, I guess if you want to be super kind to his comments.

Is he saying, essentially like, he didn't get a lot of sleep. He had to get that to sleep through the night. They're not saying that they gave it to him before the debate, are they?

GLENN: If you remember right, Rick Perry had just gotten out of back surgery. And they had him on -- I don't know. Oxicoden or whatever.

And he was at the debate. And he's like, I've got to take the painkillers. It's killing me.

Or I won't make it standing here the whole time. He takes it. He makes one mistake. Nobody says, the guy just got out of back surgery.

STU: Right.

GLENN: I mean, really? He was on Ambien. Well, those are poor choices.

STU: And the other part about this.

Because they have tried the beginning of that excuse before, which was, he was flying all around the worlds.

And he did have a trip.

But it was several days before the debate.

He got back, like before the debate.

It wases like he landed and went to the studios.

Right?

GLENN: Right expect Trump had to be doing.

STU: Trump --

GLENN: Trump does it all the time.

STU: He has energy no matter what.

It's just a ridiculous excuse.

If you can't own the debate being bad.

How can anyone trust you on your opinion on crack changing your behavior.

I feel like he's not even all that reliable.

Even on crack.

GLENN: Right.

STU: That's the one thing he knows a lot about.

GLENN: You are so right, Stu.

STU: Gosh, so disappointing.

GLENN: Now, back to his dad. Why did the Dems lose? Cut nine!

VOICE: I will tell you, why we lost the last election.

We lost the last election. Because we did want remain loyal to the leader of the party.

That's my position.

We had the advantage of an incumbency. We had the advantage of an incredibly successful administration.

STU: Stop.

VOICE: And the Democratic Party literally melted down.

GLENN: Wait.

STU: No. They melted down, because everything was going terribly.

Then their guy got on stage. And almost fell over in the middle of a debate. Ambien or no Ambien, it's over at that point.

STU: Right. I mean, it's not an indefensible point to say that what they did to get rid of him was terrible.

GLENN: No, it was a coup!

I would go further. What they did is most likely illegal and unconstitutional.

STU: Maybe. I think --

GLENN: Well, they did the movie from Office.

STU: Right. They didn't remove him from office. And he -- they did go through a process. Again, they made the process up.

They're the Democrats. It's their own party. They can choose whoever they want. They don't to have let anyone vote.

GLENN: Oh, they won't. At some point.

STU: Yeah, they're working back toward that right now. So I don't know --

GLENN: For a good portion of the people. Not voting. Democrat since 1810.
(laughter)

STU: They have a great couple of slogans.

GLENN: We do. We got a couple of shirts, that I think need to be made.

STU: I do -- I -- the change to Harris, I think probably helped them in the actual election results. I think they probably held a Senate seat, maybe.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

STU: That they would have lost.

I think they may have won. You know, I think they were closer than they would have been if Biden were the candidate.

But that being said, you -- they destroyed any credibility, they had to their voters, by allowing them to elect a person and then forcing them out. And there has to be a price to pay for that, I think long-term.

I have a theory about Trump's nuclear testing…

President Trump recently ordered the Pentagon to resume nuclear testing after Vladimir Putin announced a new underwater nuclear device. Are we heading towards a potential nuclear war, or does Trump have another goal? Glenn Beck explains his theory: Trump just won this fight...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, President Trump said yesterday, truly great meeting with President Xi.

This is a the problem. So much is hyperbole is -- truly. Like everybody said that meeting couldn't happen. It happened. And they said couldn't be done. It was done.

I got up this morning. People said I couldn't open the door, and I opened the door. Okay? It was the greatest door opening I've ever seen.
But from all accounts, this was a really, really good meeting.

Let me just say this: He's getting ready to meet with Putin. And with what Putin has done in the last couple of days, and now everybody is upset.

Oh, my gosh. Donald Trump said he's going to start testing nuclear weapons again!

Yeah. Yeah.

You know why?

Well, China is testing them.

And Russia is testing them.

We've had a moratorium on that. And here's what he's really doing. If I -- if I heard the news. And I was in the Donald Trump White House, I would be -- I would have walked in, after I heard the news, especially yesterday.

That Vladimir Putin has a new nuclear missile, that he can shoot 6,000 miles away.

Underwater. And it can navigate, and then blow up like a hydrogen bomb under the water, just off the coast of California, which would create a radioactive tsunami. This is what I would tell the president. Congratulations, Mr. President. You've won.

Now, why would I say that?

Because Vladimir Putin is not going to do that.

He's not going to do that. It would make him the pariah of the entire world. You're not going to set off a nuclear, radioactive tsunami to cover Los Angeles.

Because here's -- if I'm the president, and maybe this would make me a very bad president. But if I'm the president. And I hear that he has just launched a nuclear missile, towards Los Angeles, my decision is: Do I stop it?

Yes, I do everything I can to try to stop the missile from hitting. Do I respond before it hits?

All unconventional wisdom is, you've got to launch now, Mr. President. You have to launch now!

Hmm. Now, maybe this makes me a very bad president. I don't know.

I think it probably does. But I would say, no.

I'm not launching. Let it hit. And then I'm going to say to the rest of the world, immediately after it hits, this man just bird Los Angeles, killed all of these people, by launching a missile, a hydrogen bomb, underwater. God only knows what it's done to the environment.

But here's what it's done to people. And here's what it's done to Los Angeles. I give the world an hour before I respond.

I don't want a nuclear war. Because we all know what that means.

But rest of the world, you need to condemn him, and he needs to go on trial for crimes against humanity.

Nothing -- nothing warrants that kind of abuse of nuclear weapons.

That's what I would do as the president. Because I know the rest of the world, would not be kind to anyone who launched a nuclear weapon at the West Coast.

Wouldn't. If we launched a nuclear weapon, you know, even if we blew up Israel, with a nuclear weapon, the world would be like, look at what America has just!

They've killed all these Jews. Wait a minute. I'm so confused right now, what I'm for and what I'm against. But they would still condemn it.

Nobody can get away with that. He knows. Putin knows, the president is the most concerned about nuclear weapons. So what does he do?
He describes two nuclear weapons he has.

He's pulling out all -- there's nowhere to go from there. What are you going to do next? I'm going to blow up the moon?

He's just used everything in his bag of tricks. There's no place bigger that he can go. Other than actually launching those things. Mr. President, Congratulations, you've just won. So that's what I think is happening with -- with what Donald Trump has done this week. And the way Putin is now reacting. And he's about to turn his sites on Putin and Ukraine.

So let's start and see what happens.

What the Fed’s interest rate CUT means for YOU

The Federal Reserve has cut interest rates for the second time in the 2025 fiscal year. Glenn sifts through all the economic jargon and translates it into plain English to explain what this could mean for the average American.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me talk to you a little bit about the fed rate and what it means. Most people don't spend their evenings reading the Federal Reserve statements. And I don't blame them. Because I don't do it either.

It's like background noise from an alien planet.

The Fed has cut the rate by 25 basis points. I don't even what a basis is or a basis -- what the hell does that even mean? Why should I care about that?

Okay. Let me explain what it is, and why you should care. Because the Federal Reserve -- the quiet, most powerful group in the world has decided to cut rates. And that changes the rules of your financial life. From your mortgage to your job security. From the cost of groceries. To, you know, the health of your savings account.

What they did yesterday is not going to help your savings account. What they did yesterday, will help your job. Okay?

A little bit. Now, think of the Federal Reserve as hmm. I don't know.

The most corrupt bank -- I'm sorry. I mean, the central bank.

Think of it more like the mob that -- think of it like a very credible bank that you don't know who even owns it. Okay?

It is not part of the federal government. It's not a federal agency. That's a really important part. They don't print the money. Not directly. Okay? That's up to the Treasury.

But they control the flow of money, and if the economy slows down, this is what they say they do. Okay?

If the economy slows down or starts to break, the Fed tries to fix it by lowering the Federal Funds Rate.

That's the interest rates that the banks charge each other to borrow money overnight. And when that rate drops, supposedly, borrowing becomes cheaper for you! But does it?

Yes. But it takes time to get to you. When borrowing becomes cheaper, you can start a new business.

You can get a house. You can borrow more money.

And when people borrow more, they spend more. Which in theory, keeps jobs going. People are creating jobs. Businesses start to open up.

Et cetera, et cetera. That's the lever the Fed just pulled again. Twenty-five basis points. That means .25 percent.

It doesn't sound a lot -- like a lot. Especially if your credit card is at 21 percent. Or your car loan is at 8 percent. Or your mortgage is just choking you to death. But it is a small ripple that will go outward. And it may just be the beginning.

So if you own a home, and you have an adjustable mortgage, you'll see a slightly lower rate. Maybe -- maybe you'll save a couple hundred dollars every month. And that's nothing -- you know, that's not nothing. If you have credit card debt -- and this is my favorite part. If you have credit card debt, don't hold your breath. You're not going to see anything. Why?

Oh, because when they're raising the rates. Oh, those banks, they raise it right away. Oh, it costs us so much money to be able to borrow money. And you're going to borrow it from us, so we have to raise that rate right away, because it will cost us money. Once they lower the rate, they're not in any hurry.

They're like, you know what, let's slow down just a little bit. We don't need to lower that interest rate on the credit card, right away.

Remember I said, think of them as a Mafia -- as a really good bank. Okay?

Now, if you're shopping for a car or a small business loan, this could be your window. Because lending is going to get a little bit looser. When the money is flowing a little bit more.

Because the Fed lowers the interest rate. Then the lending gets a little looser. You can buy a car.

If you're retired or you're saving. You know, you have money, you know, in a CD or a savings account, think of this as a move from the Mafia. Your savings account will drop just a little bit. Because your savings. You'll earn less, your CDs, and everything else.

You'll earn less when the interest rates fall. Okay?

So in short, what this means yesterday, is it will help people who are borrowing money. But it will hurt people that are not savers. Now, it's not dramatic. But that's -- you know, going -- interest rate going down hurts people saving money, but helps people borrowing. Interest rates go up, it helps people who save money and hurts the people borrowing money. Okay?

So why is the fed doing this? Well, the president has been saying, can you do this, for quite some time. Because this is what spurs an economy. This is what spurs jobs being created. Because people can borrow money, and they can expand their business.

The reason why they said they did this yesterday is because, quote, the downside risk to employment has risen. What does that mean?

People are losing their jobs. That's what that means. Okay? I don't know why they just can't speak English. You know what, we have to do this because people are losing their jobs. Maybe we need to lower this down, so people can hire some more people. That's what they should say. Inflation, they said, is still somewhat elevated.

Okay. Let me translate again. We don't have -- we don't know our butt from our elbow on what we're doing with inflation.

We're out of magic tricks.

And we still have it tamed inflation. But it's getting better.

Okay. So they're trying to ease the pain of people getting fired or no job creation.

Without setting all of our money on fire.

This is the real trick and the real balance. And when I say setting our money fire. The lower the interest rates. What that means is, they're -- your money will be worth less.

Okay?

But here's the -- here's the bigger move that's buried in the fine print.

They're also stopping the shrinkage of their balance sheet. Love that.

We're just going to stop the shrinkage of our balance sheet.

Okay. What kind magic Fed Viagra are you using here to stop that shrinkage?

What it means is they're done pulling money out of the system. They're going to start adding money back in. More liquidity. More dollars that they throw in, the -- the more fuel.

And it's a soft rolling start from fighting inflation to fighting a slowdown. That's what this is.

Now, here's how it's going to hit you in the real world. If you're living paycheck to paycheck, this might feel like some relief in the short-term. Okay? Maybe your payments start to ease up.

Maybe if you're looking for a car. Maybe you get a little bit more bang for the buck. But this is just a small move in that direction. Maybe credit gets a little more available.

Maybe you can afford a little bit more of a better house.

But here's the hidden cost in the long-term.

Every rate cut makes your dollar worth a little less.

By the way, may I just side note here, Your Honor. I don't know why we accept the Fed saying, "We have a target of 2 percent inflation, every year. Two percent is -- that's our target."

Why shouldn't they be -- why shouldn't they be targeting zero percent inflation? Why do we accept that?

You know what that means? That means 2 percent, two cents on every dollar goes away every year.

I don't know. After ten years, that adds up. Why do we accept that? Because they say it in a way, nobody understands!

And so nobody pays attention. So the prices at the store, they don't fall with things like that. They usually rise.

The assets of the rich, the stock, real estate, they start to inflate again. The working class, once more, will pay for the cure. With the value of their labor. And, but this is how the cycle works. Okay?

When things tighten, the powerful scream louder than the average person, and the Fed listens. They open the money spigot. The markets rally, and the average American gets another inflation hangover at some point. Hopefully, it won't happen, at least right away.

Hopefully, we will balance things out. Because Donald Trump, with what he did in Asia yesterday, there's a huge -- there's a lot of money coming in. And he has reshaped the Western world. This guy is not going to be appreciated for -- if J.D. Vance wins. And just assuming it's going to be J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio as the president.

But if they win, after his first term, and maybe into the second term, if he's given a chance for the second term, that's when you're going to really see everything that Donald Trump is doing right now. You're going to see the effects. And you're going to realize, holy cow. I thought that guy made a huge difference at the time.

Look at what he did. He is a long-time. Long-term player.

He's looking way over the horizon. And this week in Asia was a big, big deal. So let me get back to the Fed rate.

Here's what you need to do. You need to first understand the game. This is not a bailout for you. It's a pressure valve on the system. Okay?

If you have debt, this is a signal, that you can make pay it down fast enough, while the interest rates are starting to ease. Same with our government. Interest rates are going down, don't borrow more money, spend less money. And pay things off faster.

If you have savings, look for hard assets, things that will hold their value. Real estate. Blah, blah.

If you're in business, this might be the window to shore up your position.

Don't overextend yourself. Things are still tenuous. Because this is a pivot.

This is a -- a swingback to cheap money. Hopefully not 0 percent again. But the Fed believes that the storm isn't over. And they're right.

It's not. We're in a very precarious situation between employment and runaway inflation. Now, Javier Milei has tamed this thing. And luckily, Donald Trump and Javier Milei get along, and I hope we take a few more things from Argentina.

But the Fed, almost against their own will, is trying to steer us out of a slowdown. But if we're not careful, it will set us up for another round of inflation. But the pivot point is here from the Fed, and every time they pull that lever, remember, it's -- it's you and your dollar that ends up footing the bill. One paycheck, one grocery bill, one devalued dollar at a time.

But right now, it is important for it to happen, so we balance the losing of jobs, maybe some more job creation is coming our way.

We've lost a lot of jobs just in the last week. Because of AI. And I don't know -- did we talk about this yesterday? I'm not sure we did. This week, there's been two. It's been UPS and Amazon, that have cut, what? About 100,000 jobs between the two of them. That's a lot of jobs.

But notice, it's not the guy on the front line. It's not the guy at the dock. Right now, it seems to be the white-collar worker. So the guy who didn't go to college right now, right now, is more safe than the one who did go to college and is trying to pay off all of that stuff. They're being replaced by AI before the dock worker is.

So if you didn't go to college, now is the time to go, suckers!

Because you don't to have worry about all the things that the people that are still paying for that they can no longer use.

Why this Deep State spy campaign is the WORST scandal of my lifetime

According to the records released now by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and the House Judiciary Committee, The Biden era DOJ and special counsel Jack Smith drove an investigation that sprayed subpoenas like a firehose. There were 197 subpoenas sent to 34 people, over 160 businesses, and vacuumed up communications tied to more than 400 Republican individuals and entities. Fox News, Turning Point USA, OAN, all engulfed in what has been called "Operation Arctic Frost." And all this was predicated on NEWS CLIPS?! Glenn explains why this Arctic Frost is MUCH worse than Watergate.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: While we're talking about winter, let's talk about Arctic Frost. That's the code name. And according to -- according to the records released now by senator chuck Grassley and the -- and the House Judiciary Committee. The Biden era DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith drove an investigation that sprayed subpoenas like a firehose. We now know, there were 197 subpoenas, spanning more than 1700 pages. Sent to 34 people. One hundred sixty-three businesses, and then vacuumed up communications, tied to more than 400 Republican individuals and entities.

Okay? That's reaching into everything. They reached into media companies. CBS, Fox, Fox Business, NewsMax, Sinclair, into financial institutions, into political organizations.

Even members, employees, and agents of the legislative branch. So now you have congressmen and senators being vacuumed up into this whole thing.

This is not a precision rifle shot. This is a net and a very big dragnet.

Okay? This is not the way justice in America works. You do not go after, you know, an entire party, 400 people? Now, what were they looking for? How did it start?

Well, let me say, the opening memo to justify Arctic Frost is to call -- does in legal terms, it would be called the predicate.

And it was stamped sensitive investigative matter, okay?

And it's cited. And I love this. Listen to this language. It's cited, evidence suggest a conspiracy around alternate electors.

I'll get to that here in just a second. But it -- it relied on -- leaned on news clips. News clips!

To vacuum all these people up, to get the -- to get the engine turning. News clips were used.

Suggesting, not proving. Suggesting, and it just rose up the ladder.

Ray, Garland, Monaco, even coordination with the White House counsel's office. It surfaces now in the record. This went all the way to the top.

This is not my language. This is what the documents now on the table imply.

Okay? Now, let me just pause for a minute, in the reading room of American memory. What is this all about?

Alternate electors. That's not a Martian invention. Okay?

That's not something completely foreign. We've seen it before. 1876, and 1960. They were messy. Contested. Deeply political moments that produced zero criminal prosecutions for their existence of rival slaves.

In fact, Al Gore, if he didn't set an alternate slate of electors, he was counseled, and I've talked to Dershowitz about this.

He said, they're counseled to have an alternate set of electors. Because once -- if you don't do that, and the tables turn and you're like, you know what, there was a problem -- if you haven't ceded those electors before a certain time, you have no case. You can't change anything. So it has to happen. And it has happened two times before, I think three, but definitely in 1876 and 1960.
In Hawaii, in 1916, Democrats signed certificates while a recount was still underway. The recount flipped. So it was ultimately certified. The democratic slate was certified. Ugly? Yes. But that's the way it worked.

It's not criminal. And history has said no. It's not criminal.

But it doesn't matter, when it's about Donald Trump. So let me go back to Arctic Frost thousand. As the subpoenas flew, the FBI reportedly snooped phone records of Republican members of Congress!

The scope widened to donor analytics. Broad financial data. Trump world advisers.

The lawyers. The media contacts. We said, during January 6, we said, internally, if you don't think they are going after a massive tree, because remember, this is -- this is what the Patriot Act allows you to do now.

You go after one person. If anybody is calling somebody else, well, that person now can be Hoovered up. And who has that person called?

So you can get pretty much everybody that you want, with one subpoena.

But that's not where they stop. They didn't stop with one subpoena. Okay?

When the state casts a dragnet over the opposition's political ecosystem with the authority to seize all their communications, compel testimony, and chill the donors, that's not tough politics.

Okay?

That is the government, with badges and grand juries, leaning its full weight into one side of the national scale.

Watergate. Please!

Watergate. Let me compare Watergate. You know what Watergate was?

Watergate was a gang of political operatives who broke into an office to get information. They weren't even. They weren't even losing the election. Nobody even knows why they would even do this. It is so stupid that they would even do this. But it was a local office. They broke in. They wanted to get some information that was there, you know, on the -- on the candidate and on the race.

And then they covered it up.

And they tried to keep the public from the truth.

It was wrong!

It was criminal.

And it forced a president to resign. And people went to prison over it. But Watergate was a private burglary, executed by a campaign, and covered up. By the White House.

Terrible!

Awful.

That's not the DOJ blanketing the opposing party's entire world, with federal subpoenas while citing news hits as the predicate.

Do you see the difference?

Watergate was an attempt to weaponize a campaign. Arctic Frost, if the emerging records hold, was the attempt to weaponize the entire state against a political party.

The difference there is the whole ball game. Under a constitutional republic.

You don't have a constitutional republic, if that's allowed to happen.

In America, the state is supposed to be the neutral referee. Not a sideline enforcer wearing one team's colors under the stripes.

And don't even start with me on, well, what about Donald Trump?

We'll play that game all day long. And you know where that gets us?

Nowhere. You want to make a charge against Donald Trump and what he's doing.

Good. Let's take that separately.

Let's do that. I'm willing to. Let's take that separately. Let's deal with this one, first. Okay? The moment the referee picks up the ball and starts running, the game is over!

It's not a fair game anymore. And if it can be done to them, today. It will be done to you, tomorrow.

That's not a slogan. That's a law of political gravity.

Yeah. But Trump did -- okay. Let's have that conversation.

But can we at least have it honestly?

Because if you think this is about, whataboutism. You believe so see the nose on the front of your face.

You're completely missing this.

You cannot make a weaponization of a government, a partisan inheritance that each side can claim when it holds power.

If any president, any prosecutor red, or blue, uses federal power to criminalize political opposition, rather than prosecute clear crimes.

It is an offense gets an equal protection under the law. So let's -- let's lay down a standard here, that I'm willing to apply to Donald Trump and to Joe Biden and any other president that comes our way. Because if we don't lay this clear standard down, we're done.

The predicate. Predication. It has to be real. Not rhetorical.

Evidence suggesting via TV interviews, is circular sourcing, at its best.

It's not something that you launch a sprawling investigation on into a presidential rival's universe. If you can't articulate the crime, specifically, you don't get to launch a dragnet on the people that are running against you!

The scope has to be narrow, and tied exactly to the alleged crime!

Not a sweep through media organizations, and donor records, and opposition infrastructure, under vague theories, that come from TV reports!

Journalism.

Political advocacy.

Fundraising.

All of those things are protected activities. Separation from the White House, also must be unmistakable. If the White House Counsel's office is coordinating device transfers into an investigation of its chief political rival, alarms should clang in every corridor of every main justice call hall.

Everywhere! The alarm -- the Claxton should be going off right now. Also, historic practice matters!

If prior episodes -- by the way, this was all thrown out by the Supreme Court. So you know. Okay? Nothing there.

If prior episodes, 1876, 1960, and I believe 2000. If they were treated as political, not criminal, especially where alternate electors were explicitly conditional, then you need compelling new legal theories and clean facts to criminalize it now.

You can't just say, yeah, well, history, never did anything about it before. And, actually, they said it was fine.

But now, now it's going to be a crime.

Wait. Can you be specific on what has changed? Well, we really just liked the people that are doing it this time. That doesn't count. That doesn't count.

Now, before anybody clips this monologue and screams, so Glenn Beck said, nobody -- the Trump administration did anything wrong. Well, I don't think so.

But that's not what I'm saying, because I'm not the judge. I'm not your juror. I'm the guy insisting that the rules are rules, and they should be applied to everyone on all sides.

Smith has his report. He says, he wants to tell his side. Great! Put him under oath. If he didn't do it, then he should be set free.

But it should be on a clear set of laws! What's happened in the Biden administration, they just kept changing laws. Well, yeah. I mean, the bank said there was no crime. But Donald Trump. And so all of a sudden, there was a crime.

Nobody has ever been prosecuted. Ever before that. Even the bank said, this is ridiculous.

There's no crime here.

It didn't matter.

That's not justice.

I want real justice. Smith says he has a side, let's hear it. Bring forward the memos. Publish the predicate. Let the country see where weather we had a criminal case or an election cycle dragnet. Because that's what it looks like. If the emerging picture looks like, if the Arctic Frost opened up on thin evidence, escalated on political pressure, and metastasized into a government-wide sweep of the sitting president's chief rival and his entire ecosystem, then this is not just like Watergate. This is much, much, much worse than Watergate. In kind.

Not just degree.

Watergate tried to steal the information. That's it. They potentially attempted to steal legitimacy to criminalize opposition by wielding the sword of the state.

That violates, you know, more than statutes. That violates our creed, that free men govern themselves by consent, and the process is sacred. And the law is the wall that even presidents and prosecutors can never climb over. If proven, the remedy is not a sternly, terse letter, or an op-ed, and a shrug.

The remedy is the full force of the law. Inspector general referrals. Special counsels where appropriate, prosecution where crimes are clear. Statutory reforms to bar this from ever happening again from -- from press clippings?

Being your predicate? Bright lines need to be drawn. Protections for the press, for donors, and legislators in political cases. Sunlight. All the sunlight on how this began, who approved it, and why no one in the administration said stop.

And to my friends saying, well, Trump is doing the same thing. I hear you. I don't agree with you, but I hear you. Why don't we codify the guardrails right now?

So when emotions are high and temptations are strong, the republic doesn't survive by trusting that our guys will be angels. It survives on the chains on power. Everyone's power.

You know, when I hold a founding sermon in your hand, when you read the ink of Washington scratched in the margin notes of James Madison. You discover that America's miracle wasn't that we selected saints. It's that we built a system where even the sinners are fenced in by law.

That's the process. When justice is blind, to banners and bumper stickers and political parties, that's when America is America. Arctic Frost. If the record stands, it took a blowtorch to that fence.

So the choice is really simple. Retreat into teams. Each side cheering for its prosecutors. And its dragnet. Or you can do the harder, nobler thing, just like our founders did. And insist that the same rules that bind all power, especially when it's aimed at people that we dislike, are enforced. That's how you keep a republic.

That's how you make sure that there's not a second Watergate. Because we learned the lesson the first time. But it we?

Because if we haven't. If we don't learn it this time, and by God, we are done!

The story of America is not a story of who got whom. It's a story of the people who refuse to let the government become a weapon. And if that spirit still lives in us, then this cold wind called Arctic Frost will pass. And the Constitution will withstand. Because you stood for equal justice. For due process. For truth. That doesn't bend to politics.

And that, that is how we relight the torch of America!

Disease-Infested Monkeys LOOSE in Mississippi?!

A truck carrying 21 'aggressive' monkey's allegedly infected with contagious diseases such as COVID-19, herpes, and Hepatitis C crashed in Mississppi, causing the monkey's to be let loose. While most of the threat was taken care of, one monkey is reported to still be on the loose. This sounds eerily similar to the beginning of an outbreak movie...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Big thing some good news. Let's start with some good news.

President Trump has just -- is touring Asia and making all kinds of deals.

Donald Trump is single-handedly reshaping the earth!

He really is. He is reshaping everything. Single-handedly.

STU: Big job.

GLENN: I know. He's done more than The Great Reset did with all of that money. All of the campaigns. Everything that they were doing.

Listen to this. What he's just done. Signed a framework agreement, August 28th, between Trump and the Japanese Prime Minister, mutual stockpiling of rare-earth elements, REEs. Okay?

To ensure supply security. That's Japan. Cooperation with international partners, US allies, to shield the supply chain from disruptions.

The goal is to reduce China's 90 percent control over the global rare earth minerals.

For tech, EVs, defense, and AI. Okay. They have a 90 percent stranglehold.

So that's what he did in Japan. Now, also bundle that with the 550 billion dollar strategic investment from Japan, in the US. Including a 490 billion-dollar launch phase. 200 billion for nuclear AI and energy projects, small modular reactors with Westinghouse and Mitsubishi, and supply chain boosts in critical minerals.

Trump tied that to the tariffs. Japan got an auto import tariff slashed from '27 to 15 percent in exchange for the investments. In two weeks in the last two weeks, listen to what he has done. He has made multiple pacts with allies. Australia, critical minerals framework, mining processing, and rare earth mineral recycling scrap. Then in Japan, I just told you, Malaysia, he just did a memo of understanding on critical mineral diversification. In Ukraine, a ten-year access to titanium and rare earth minerals.

In Thailand, an MOU on rare earth mineral supply. Add that to what else he has done. He is -- he is outflanking China. He is trying to break the back of China! He is friend shoring, is what he's actually doing.

He is -- he is putting all of this emphasis on rare earth minerals. He's cutting Asia away from China.

He's cutting Europe away from China. He's cutting South America away from China. He has moved all of the resources of rare earth minerals to us. Anything outside of China, is coming our way now!

That is massive! Massive! We were sitting ducks with rare earth minerals, six months ago, a year ago. Total sitting ducks! They had everything coming their way. We were not doing any kind of -- any kind of strategic thinking on this, at all!

And this isn't piecemeal. This is operation warp speed for rare earth minerals. He is -- the guy is so ahead of everyone else. He is reshaping global trade and permanently, hopefully, sidelining China.

So we are never having to put our hand out to China.

It's remarkable, what is happening. Just remarkable! Now, let me give you another story.

A truck halling 21 monkeys to a testing facility in Florida, overturned in Mississippi.
(laughter)

STU: How did -- how did we make this jump? Has he signed a memorandum of understanding with the monkeys?

GLENN: Nope. Nope. They're still negotiating. According to the Jasper county sheriff's office, the accident occurred on Interstate 59, near the 117 mile-marker just north of Heidelberg. Six recess monkeys from Tulane University escaped. Officials said, five of the six that escaped have now been destroyed.

We've been in contact with an animal disposal company to help handle the situation. The Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks and I guess now monkeys is still looking for one diseased monkey, still on the loose.

STU: A hundred percent, the beginning of an outbreak movie. That's exactly how it happens. The one gets away. Oh, we've got five of the six. What's the big deal?

GLENN: What was the one. What was the movie with -- oh. What's his name?

Tommy -- remember, he was the escaped convict. He was the doctor, and they were hauling him. He was the doctor from Ohio.

Based on a true story. And he -- they're hauling him. And he escapes. He has to try to prove himself innocent. Remember?

STU: Fugitive?

GLENN: Fugitive. Yeah. That's right.

STU: I was looking for a deep cut there.

GLENN: Fugitive. Sorry, I couldn't remember. It's a fugitive, and outbreak. That's what this is.

STU: That would be a good movie. I wouldn't want this in real life.

GLENN: I prefer a lot of this to not happen in real life.

STU: What are the diseases? We have help C going on?

We have COVID. I think there's three of them. Help C. COVID. And what was the other one? Herpes.

What happens if we combine all three into one monkey, and then release it into the wild?

What could possibly go wrong?

GLENN: Let me tell you something.

You know, we are in real trouble. I mean, I hate to bring this up too. Okay. Did you need diseased monkeys on the loose today from me?

No. No. Can I make it worse?

Absolutely, I can make this worse.

You know when we have the COVID thing. And we were all like, we shouldn't have these labs everywhere, you know.

STU: Oh. Like the labs.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Gain-of-function research, and things like that.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

We've built hundreds of new labs now. Hundreds of new labs. There are more than 35 hundred BSL3 and over 110BSL4. Bio safety level four laboratories. And all of them are now working on pathogens that could kill all of us.

So a 2025 journal of public health study reveals over90 percent of the countries that operate these labs have no oversight whatsoever!

STU: All of them are working on diseases that can kill us all?

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: There's not one that is doing yogurt flavors or something?

There's not one.

GLENN: No. There's not. There's not one. I wish there were!

You know, they keep saying, these are shields from -- no. These are match sticks. That's what these labs are. These are giant match sticks.

And we're sitting in a bunch of kindling -- they're -- they say they're developing vaccines. But what they're really doing is enhancing the viruses. Which, when I say enhancing, what that really means, they're weaponizing viruses. So don't worry. You know, it's just gain of function, which translated is, loss of sanity.

STU: I mean, because the research makes me very nervous. I mean, the fact that we have more labs that have higher safety standards. In theory, should be -- that was one of the problems with the COVID outbreak. Right?

They were doing research that should have been done at a BSL4. BSL1 and BSL2.

So, I mean, having more fours, that could be good, right?

GLENN: Eh. Did you see the BSL4 in China? In Wuhan?

STU: Well, I think that was the issue, it wasn't a BSL4.

GLENN: I think they called it a BSL4, and then it wasn't one.

STU: I don't think it was. Do we have a BSL4 for monkey research? I think really --

GLENN: I'm not really sure -- I know Georgia.

STU: Don't transfer it. Keep it in one place. You don't need to transfer them anywhere.

GLENN: In Atlanta, they're doing -- they're building another 150,000 square feet of a BSL4 in -- in Atlanta. So that's the place, oh, yeah, where all the zombies will be. Can I just tell you a quick little story? 1979. Soviet Union.

You know, they're trying to maintain this BSL4. They're not very good at it. Because, you know, they're not good at anything in 1979 in Russia.

STU: Except for nuclear power.

GLENN: Exactly right.

Okay. So there was a cloud released from this bio safety level lab four.

No flames. No alarms. Just a faint, invisible mist. It's kind of like hmm, my teenage son's farts. It's invisible, and it's deadly.

STU: Okay. Hmm.

GLENN: And it was carrying anthrax spores, okay? From the weapons lab.

Well, people began to die, clearly. We don't know how many. They think hundreds. Entire families suffocated because the bacteria devoured their lungs. And they were like, I have no lung!

GLENN: Okay. And the Kremlin was like, not happening. What do you say?

People were eating tainted meat. That's what's happening.

And it's eating their lungs.

STU: They Chernobyled it.

GLENN: Yeah. Okay.

So for a decade, nobody really knew what was going on, until the fall of the Soviet Union, and then people were going in. And they were like, oh! Here's what happened.

In one of these bio safety labs, a technician failed to replace an air filter properly.
And that was -- that -- just that allowed this microscopic storm of death to be released into the air.

I don't know! I mean, if your air filter not being installed properly can kill a bunch of people. And only tainted meat. McDonald's. I don't know. I don't -- I don't really think that we should -- we have them all over. 149 nations have them now.

149.

STU: There's definitely not 149 nations that should have stuff like that.

GLENN: You don't think so?

STU: No. I don't even think I can name 149 nations.

GLENN: Try this one. In India, the labs now are experimenting with the Crimean Congo viruses. Fatality rate of 75 percent.

In Russia, under its sanitary shield initiative, they are building 15 new BSL4 sites. In Brazil, Project Orion, a high-containment complex integrated with its particle accelerator.

Oh. And as I said, Atlanta, 160,000 square feet.

Apparently, we don't have enough room for all the monkeys that we're releasing in all the wild. And eventually, we'll find. And put them in there.
And torture them. Or do whatever it is we do. No international body tracks or regulates what's happening in any of these fortresses. What the hell is wrong with us?

STU: We should note an international body does not necessarily solve the problem.

I mean, as we've seen -- when they do monitor it, they usually import people to rape the citizens around the facilities.

GLENN: Exactly right. But you know what I'm really sick of it? There's no international body that does anything, except just let these people put really bad things into our body!

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Can we -- can we stop with this?

STU: We're good with this on our own. Put all sorts of things in my body. That should not have been in there.

We're good at doing that.

As Americans, on our own. We don't need your help.

GLENN: I really -- just stop.

The arrogance. The arrogance of these -- hey, you know what, we need to fiddle with some more viruses. And let's make a digital God that we can't control!

What the hell is wrong with us?

STU: Especially when the digital God that we can't control can make new viruses.

GLENN: Exactly right! Exactly right.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And maybe -- maybe -- maybe what we do, is we put it into a self-driving car. And it directs. And monkeys just start flying out of everyone ever seen butt.