Why THIS Miller Lite commercial makes Glenn ‘SICK AND TIRED’

Why THIS Miller Lite commercial makes Glenn ‘SICK AND TIRED’

After the HUGE Bud Light controversy concerning Dylan Mulvaney, you’d think every other beer company in America would do EVERYTHING possible to avoid a similar catastrophe. Yet, a months-old ad from Miller Lite has now gone viral too. And this particular commercial makes Glenn ‘SICK AND TIRED!’ Why? Because it goes against nature, of course. He explains the ‘scientific, biological’ truth in this clip…


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Miller Lite, you would think has -- has been awake, or let me say it.

Have not been in a coma, for the last month or so.

STU: I would think. I don't know how much of their product they've consumed. Likely, they have been sober at times.

GLENN: I think it would take a medical coma, to not know what happened to Bud Light.

STU: It's been an incredible gift to them.

GLENN: Yes. Theirs skyrockets. And Bud loses its number one status.

Big news. If you're in the beer industry.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Well, they have put together a new -- a new ad.

And can -- can we -- can we play the ad please?

VOICE: Here's a little known fact: Women were among the very first to brew beer ever, from Mesopotamia, to the Middle Ages, to colonial America, women were the ones doing the brewing. Centuries later, how did the industry pay homage to the founding mothers of beer? They put us in bikinis. Wow.

GLENN: Yes. Wait. Just a bikini lady.

VOICE: Look at it. It's wild! It's time beer made it up to women.

So today, Miller Lite is on a mission to clean up, not just their (bleep), the whole beer industry's (bleep).

Miller Lite has been scouring internet for all this (bleep) and buying it back so that we can turn it into good (bleep) for women brewers! Literally --

GLENN: Wait. Okay. Stop.

STU: So stupid. It's so stupid. I can't.

GLENN: I can't -- I can't take it.

First of all, that was a very nice poster that she took down and shredded. And I don't appreciate that.

STU: Yeah, and just to give you some science behind it. There's absolutely no way you're getting more benefit out of shredding a document than I guess turning it into some sort of fertilizer for beer, than the electricity used to just shred the document. There's no way that's a worthwhile transaction.

GLENN: I was just going to say that. No, it's good for everything.

STU: No. No.

GLENN: I would also like to point out.

Now, this came out before Bud Light. And then it kind of went away.

And here's my thing. What were you doing for the last month, if not trying to make sure that never saw the light of day again?

STU: Right. They've been deleted off -- it should have been deleted off the YouTube page. Right.

GLENN: Oh, if I'm Miller. I go and see if we can buy an EMP to shut down and erase and fry all the chips.

So, you know, they say the internet is forever.

Hmm. Not with an EMP.

STU: You want to be like a future draftee of the NFL deleting your old tweets.

That's what you want to be. Hiding your history, because you're right.

This has been a huge boon to Miller Lite and Coors Light, and all these other brands that are not Bud Light. As they cut their sales by 25 percent. The current number is. It was as high as 25.

So they come out with this. Which is just again, it goes on to tell you, they will take the -- they literally claim. I can't imagine this is true.

But they claim, at Miller Lite. They're going on I guess e Bay.

And buying up old cardboard cutouts of bikini models for beer ads. And then having them sent to them.

Which, again, all of the emissions and all the other stuff associated with this, is just a side hustle here.

But it goes all the way to them. Then they're taking it, and they're composting it. Shredding it and composting it. And then using it -- transporting it to somewhere else again. Where they will make beer that will be transported somewhere else.

GLENN: Oh. There's nothing better than cardboard beer. I will tell you that right now. If you can take that and mix it with some crap, and you just let it steam in a pile for a while.

STU: That's the original formula for Miller Lite.

GLENN: And you mix it into -- may I just say. So what you're saying is that men said horrible things and took horrible pictures of women to sell beer.

STU: Yep.

GLENN: So you're now making that up, by saying horrible things about men to sell women beer?

STU: Uh-huh. And also, I will say, horrible things about women. You're saying horrible things about women too.

Because what you're doing is denying their agency to live their lives.

You see, men didn't put women in bikinis. What happened is individual women sent in their head shots and body shots to try out to attempt to get the jobs, this woman in a sweater is now criticizing. By the way, I don't know if you've noticed this, Glenn.

They treat these women as so much -- they take in their agency, so much, in this ad. They have actually blurred out their faces in the ad.

I don't know if you noticed that. The bikini picture, because you weren't looking at her face in the bikini picture.

GLENN: Kudos. Did you find that out through Lisa?

STU: No, I had to watch it like 46 times. And eventually, oh, my God. Their faces were gone!

But these are individual women, who made individual decisions based on what they wanted to do.

Now, we can be critical of that as a career goal. But if you're in a model, getting into a national ad campaign, probably a big deal. Probably something you're proud of.

But this woman in a sweater, says, you shouldn't be proud of it.

In fact, it wasn't even you doing it. Men put you in the bikinis.

GLENN: Well, I have to tell you, I like the fact that she looks like mom.

Because I've wanted my mother to make all of the choices in my life.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And that could just keep going on. You know, I just -- I think every guy loves that. I think every woman loves that. When mom comes in and tells them exactly what to do.

But I have a bigger problem with this. And we'll get to that in 60 seconds.

GLENN: So let me ask you something. Do men actually exist anymore? I mean, have we phased them out entirely?

STU: We phased out women entirely. You think we've phased out men entirely?

GLENN: Well, I think so.

If you're not crying and you're not thinking, maybe I too can get pregnant. I don't think you exit in today's world. Okay?

If you are a woman, who is a strong woman, but is a woman who is like, I don't want your corporate job. I don't want this. Or that. I'm not going and playing by those rules.

You're not really a woman either. Now, here's the good news.

If those men and those women, that don't play by those rules, get together. They'll have children, the other ones won't.

And we win. But -- but why wait that long? Why wait that long?

I am so sick and tired of having to deny the natural state of things.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: The natural state of things is men, like women.

Women like men noticing them. Not being creepy about it, but noticing them.

STU: That's part of the human attraction situation, that set up all of procreation and civilization, sure.

GLENN: Now, there's a reason sex feels good. Because that's God saying, right? You like that, you should do that more.

STU: Do this, dummy.

GLENN: Because you're trying to have children. Okay.

STU: This is science, by the way.

GLENN: Totally science. This is a science driven show.

Now, I gave up on Sports Illustrated, the swimsuit edition, a long time ago.

And it was the only edition of Sports Illustrated, I was ever interested in. Okay?

But I gave up on it, when they started putting fat people on the cover. Now, nothing against fat people. We're part of the fat community.

GLENN: No, I'm the king of the fat people. But I'm the kind of fat people that I don't think exist anymore.

The kind of fat people that you're kind of embarrassed that you're fat. I mean, it's not enough to get you to stop eating.

STU: No. Of course not.

GLENN: Right. But you're not happy when it's beach time.

You know, you're like, I'm not going to the beach. Nobody wants to see me in a swimsuit. And good heavens, man, I can see my reflection in the ocean, I'm not going.

STU: Sure.

GLENN: Okay? I'm that kind of fat person.

But we've graduated now to a more enlightened fat person like Lizzo.

Or -- right? Lizzo is the fat -- very good flautist, I might say.

STU: She's quite a good flautist. She is quite the flautist.

GLENN: But she is a fat flautist.

STU: A flautist.

GLENN: And I don't want to see her in all of her fatness.

STU: Even if she's flouting?

GLENN: I don't -- well, if she has clothes on, yes.

STU: You want to see her flouting in clothes?

GLENN: Well, no. I don't want to see it. But I'll look at it. Okay? I'll look at it.

STU: Sure.

GLENN: I don't know what happened to the people who are like, I'm not in a bikini. I -- I look good in a bikini. I should wear a bikini.

Because I don't see those people anymore. I just see people like men, wearing a bikini. And they shouldn't be in a bikini. Because they're men. Let alone, fat men.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: I would like to break this down here, with Miller Lite. As this is unnatural.

Everything that is happening goes against nature. Just want to throw that in. Just, you know -- just some scientific biological truth. Just mic drop there. I'm just saying.

How Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion WILL Create the Next Public Health Crisis | Glenn TV | Ep 348

How Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion WILL Create the Next Public Health Crisis | Glenn TV | Ep 348

Everything is a “public health crisis” these days. Racism. Climate change. The lack of access to “gender-affirming care.” But there’s one ACTUAL public health crisis the far Left has created: diversity, equity, and inclusion. The future of YOUR health care is at stake as this dangerous reform movement is being forced upon American medical schools, all of the professional medical organizations, and hospitals, with total endorsement from Biden’s White House. Glenn Beck exposes how this academic cancer is changing medical school admissions and graduates, what caused this movement to accelerate, the real-world life-and-death consequences of this insanity for patients, and how any resistance to this movement brings swift crackdown from the Thought Police. Glenn is joined by Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, the founder of “Do No Harm,” a network of doctors, nurses, medical students, and patients working to get identity politics out of medicine. Dr. Goldfarb taught medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and published more than a hundred articles in the New England Journal of Medicine and other top medical journals. He debunks the racist claim that “black patients need black doctors” and sounds the alarm on deadly efforts to push unqualified doctors on patients.

EXCLUSIVE: Will RFK, Jr. Change Glenn's Mind?

EXCLUSIVE: Will RFK, Jr. Change Glenn's Mind?

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. once called Glenn a traitor because he thought Glenn's opinions on climate change were "dangerous" and should be shut down. But now, he's one of the biggest CRITICS of censorship. So, what changed? Glenn decided to sit down with the independent presidential candidate to find out.

SHOCKING: You Need HOW MUCH Money to “Live Comfortably” in Each State?!

SHOCKING: You Need HOW MUCH Money to “Live Comfortably” in Each State?!

With inflation still on the rise, Glenn and Stu review another shocking number: how much money you need to “live comfortably” in America. The numbers have gone through the roof and it’s no surprise that the most expensive states are blue states. Thanks to inflation, a single adult now needs to make over $100,000 a year in order to live comfortably in many states. So, can you afford your state?


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So there's a new number out now, on what it costs to live in the United States of America. It's a little higher than it used to be.

And I -- I don't know if anybody has noticed they're having a hard time making ends meet.

Comfortable to live comfortably is defined as the monthly income, needed to cover a 50/30/20 budget, which allocates 50 percent of your earnings for necessities like housing and utility costs, 30 percent for discretionary spending, and 20 percent for savings or investments.

STU: Wow. I don't think a lot of people are living like that.

GLENN: Nobody is living like that. Nobody is living like that.

STU: That -- but wait. Percent of what? If you're making $10 million. You know. What is it -- you don't need to have a 50/30/20 lifestyle to live comfortably, right?

GLENN: Right. Right.

They're saying this is the minimum. This is what it takes to, you know, live comfortably. In America.

STU: So -- this is not talking about -- I think Jeff Bezos is pretty good. I don't think he needs an article.

STU: You're saying, they're basically reverse engineering the number you need to hit that. Is that what you're saying?

GLENN: Yes. Yes.

Okay. All right? Jeez.

STU: I was trying to understand.

GLENN: Here they are.

Most costly states: Massachusetts. $116,000.

STU: Hard-core conservative state.

GLENN: Hawaii. You'll see this a lot. Hawaii, 113.

STU: Another conservative -- red state.

GLENN: California, 113.

STU: Big red state there.

GLENN: New York, 111.

STU: Wow.

GLENN: I'm rounding out the top. Topping out the top five is Washington State, with 106.

STU: Another big red state. That's amazing. So $100,000, and you cannot live comfortably.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: That's incredible.

GLENN: Okay. Now, to live comfortably in these states, you need to earn double what most single earners typically make. The median income for a single full-time worker is around $60,000. The national median for living comfortably is $89,000.

So there's a shortage there.

STU: And those are statewide numbers to point out. It's a lot worse in these cities.

Like, there was a time. I don't know this is eight to ten years old now.

When I remember looking at this. They gave you these guide lines, what you need to earn to buy an average home in the market. In the market of San Francisco, the -- several of the players on the roster of the San Francisco giants, did not earn enough money, to buy the average home.

GLENN: It's crazy.

STU: In the market.

GLENN: So let me go through this. Alabama, to live comfortably, $83,000.

Alaska, $96,000.

And I don't know if that's ever -- I don't know if you're ever comfortable living in Alaska, unless you can change the climate completely.

GLENN: Yeah. Right.

Arizona, $97,000. Arkansas, 79

STU: Gosh.

GLENN: California, 113. Colorado, 103. Connecticut, 100. Delaware, 94. Florida, 93.

Think of that. In Florida, it's 93. In Colorado, it's 100. Georgia, 96. Hawaii, 113. Idaho, 88. Illinois, 95. Indiana, 85. Iowa, 83. Kansas, 84. Kentucky, 80. Louisiana, 82. Maine, 91.

Why? Bear traps? Maryland.

STU: That's a northeast state.

GLENN: Maryland, 102. Massachusetts, 116. Michigan, 84. Minnesota, 89. Mississippi, 82. Missouri, 84. Montana, 84. Nebraska, 83.

STU: A lot of these -- these are like the bargain basement states. You are having $85,000 to live comfortably.

GLENN: I know. Yeah.

STU: That's just putting away some money for retirement. That's not living -- you're not flying private.

GLENN: I know. Yeah, but you're not living paycheck to paycheck. If you would live that way. If you would do 50/30/20.

STU: Right. Right.

GLENN: Nevada, 93.

Nobody does that. Do you know anybody who is young, that put 20 percent of their salary away for savings?

STU: Depends what you mean by young. As you're starting out, you're just trying to make it, pay your bills. As you get older, you're trying to put some money away.

GLENN: 20 percent?

STU: It's hard to do.

GLENN: Really hard to do. Nevada, 93.

STU: By the way, 50/20/30. What are the taxes on this one? This is post-tax revenue, I assume.

GLENN: Yeah. Where are the taxes?

STU: Another 30 is going to taxes. So which part of it are you taking out?

GLENN: That's why nobody saves. New Hampshire, 98. New Jersey, 103. To live in New Jersey. New Mexico, 83. New York, 111. North Carolina, 89. North Dakota, 52.

STU: North Dakota. This is -- this is hwy people go to the Dakotas, I suppose. It's --

GLENN: Is it worth Dakota, though? You don't even have the presidential thing on the mountain, that Dakota.

STU: That's true. Was that the Doug Burgum state?

GLENN: Yes, it is. Fifty-two.

STU: You got those eyebrows. They are kind of like -- on the Mount Rushmore of eyebrows. I don't know if that counts.

GLENN: Ohio, 80. Oklahoma, 80. Oregon, 101.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Pennsylvania, 91. Rhode Island, 100. Oh, my gosh, for Rhode Island!

South Carolina, 88. South Dakota, 81. Tennessee, 86. Texas, 87. Utah, 93. Vermont, 95.
Virginia, 99. Washington, 106. West Virginia, 78.
That's a state you could live in. Wisconsin, 84. Wyoming, 87.


STU: First of all, the red and blue state is -- I don't know if it's perfect. It's darn close to perfect, as far as the difference is.

GLENN: It is. It is.

STU: You look at that, and you think -- it wasn't that long ago, that we would say, oh, my gosh, nap guy is earning six figures. Doing really well.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: That's just not even doing really well.


STU: It's the way you're supposed to plan for your future. And now you need to earn six figures, in most states. Or at least close to most states.

GLENN: And it's going to get worse. That's the problem. It will get worse.

How will companies be able to keep up with it? How is that going to happen?

GLENN: The presses.
STU: Yeah. But eventually, people can't afford to produce the products that people want, and people can't afford to buy the products that they need.

STU: I mean, you just recited the slogan for Bidenomics. That's exactly --

GLENN: Yes, I did. Starts bottom up. Bottom up. First people to be heard.

The bottom. And eventually, it's heard all the way up.

The -- in another remarkable story, the IMF has come out and said, that Biden has got to stop money.

Printing money, and spending money.

The International Monetary Fund, sounded the alarm on the Biden administration's rampant spending as, quote, out of line with what is needed for long-term fiscal stability.

STU: No!

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

STU: What? It feels like it's right in line with the exact -- what you're supposed to do with each budget is spend trillions of dollars than you have.

I thought that's the way you're supposed to be fiscally responsible. What is the 50, 30, 20 number for the United States right now? It's like 80, 50, zero. Eighty, 50, negative 30. Right?

That's what we're doing. The savings is negative 30 percent of the budget. We're spending mandatories, like 80 percent of what we have. Then there's another 50 percent discretionary. It's insanity. And we're getting to the point very soon. Just the interest on the money already spent will be more than our entire defense budget.

GLENN: We will have to borrow over a trillion dollars a year, just for the interest.

STU: My God.

GLENN: I mean, this is unsustainable.

And I really don't understand, why more people can't see this.

STU: You keep seeing this word.

I don't think it means what you think it means.

What Would Happen if Israel RETALIATED Against Iran's Missile Attack?

What Would Happen if Israel RETALIATED Against Iran's Missile Attack?

Iran’s attack against Israel made barely any impact (despite what Iran is telling its people). But will Israel strike back? It has the right to, and many Israeli leaders seem to want to, but SHOULD it? Glenn and Stu discuss whether it’s worth risking World War III, or whether Iran is too weak to do anything else.


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So let's just recap what we know now, what happened over the weekend with the Iranian attack on Israel. First of all, the Iran state TV used footage from the Texas fire. Also, there was footage of One Direction.

STU: The band?

GLENN: The band. And it was Israelis, panicking while under attack while under missiles and drones. Unfortunately, it was just a throng of excited One Direction fans.

STU: Wow, the fact that those things look the same, may make you rethink things if you're a One Direction fan.

GLENN: It really does. They also use a picture of a forest fire in Chile. So, you know, they're running all kinds of lies. I don't know if their people understand that they really made no impact at all.

STU: I'm kind of -- look, I kind of hope -- this is weird. I kind of hope they are able to convince their people, that they made an impact.
Because maybe this will somewhat calm down.

GLENN: So the president boasted the attack had, quote, taught a lesson to the Zionist regime. They were chanting with their fists in the air, death to Israel. Death to America. Yay. And Hezbollah supporters were out in the streets, of southern Beirut, honking their horns and celebrating.

And they warned that Jordan would be the next target, if it took any measures in Israel's defense.

So everybody is just like holding back.

Except for Israel. Now, my goals may not be the same goals, as the Israelis. My interests are, let's not have any terrorism here in America.

And let's try to bring peace to the world.

Israel has played this game for so long. They're not going to sit back. At least the word we're getting from their -- their war committee, was that it was a brawl.

The defense minister stated yesterday, that Israel's confrontation with Iran is not over yet.

The public security minister demanded a crushing attack, against Iran. Another minister, declared Iran's audacity in such an attack, must be erased.

Meanwhile, Iran's mission to the UN said, should the Israeli regime make another mistake. Iran's response will be considerably more severe.

And warned the US to stay away. Okay. I don't know what they can do with their -- their missiles. Quite honestly.

I think it was embarrassing. If that were us, well, that would be us. Because Joe Biden is in charge. Maybe Joe Biden helped them with planning of this mission. But that were us. That would be humiliating.

Absolutely humiliating.

And, I mean, it's the -- wouldn't you say, it was the most lopsided thing you have seen, possibly ever? With the amount that they fought back?

STU: Yeah. It goes back to a couple of examples. The first gulf war.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Remember that.

GLENN: Except they fought back. And they did hit targets. This one hit -- they say three -- the outside is ten. That they hit ten -- that missiles hit ten things. They fired over 300.

STU: 300, right. The other one that comes to mind. The way we reacted in Afghanistan, when the Taliban started taking it over again. We kind of just all ran. And that -- that seemed -- that was embarrassing. I was embarrassing that way. The way I think Iran should be embarrassed this way. That's if their intent is to actually get a lot of damage. Look, we have an alternate theory. We talked about it yesterday.

They floated a bunch of flying lawn mowers over there. With 12 hours notice for a reason.

To say, hey. Shoot all these town.

We don't want to start an international war. If we don't do something in our country. Our people will overthrow us.

GLENN: So you're sitting in Israel.

And I say, Stu. What are you going to do? Now, you're an Israeli.

You're in the defense cabinet. And I say, what are you going to do?

Because the whole world hates us right now?

And if we retaliate, then we're in trouble. Should we just walk away and call this thing?

GLENN: Again, there's so much to weigh here. And I'm an idiot. But I will tell you, my initial instinct is, you have a free hall pass to --

GLENN: No. No. No. No. Your first impression is you're an to it. I just don't want that to get lost.

STU: The second impression was --

GLENN: The first one was, again --

STU: I'm an idiot. Number two. And I should not be making these decisions for any nation. We should be clear about that. That's not a good policy, because I'm an idiot.

GLENN: Sure. You're an idiot. You could work for the Biden administration.

STU: I will say, maybe I should leave the country. This one here, because it seems that's the path to success these days.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: But I will say, what my thought would be, is you have a free hall pass to do another Syria type of operation. Right?

You can -- of course, are justified. If I was an Israeli, you would be justified to launch at least 300 missiles towards Iran. You're justified morally to do so.

However, what I would like to do is tamp this down, so it doesn't inflame into something worse. If you were are to do something like they did in Syria. Where you took over some important, overseas. Not in Iran. Type of operation. That would actually benefit you.

Not like as a show of power or strength. If you're Israel, you don't need to do that. What you need to do is do something that would actually benefit you.

And I think it would be difficult for the world to be all that upset.

If you went and did another operation like that.

GLENN: I forgot.

I was going to say, no. No. No.

STU: That's a smart answer for an idiot.

GLENN: I forgot you were an idiot. It would be tough for the world to say.

You remember, you're a Jew here.

STU: Right. So they --

GLENN: They can say whatever they want.

STU: They can say whatever they want.

GLENN: They're always the pad guy.

STU: But there is a line.

The world wasn't overly outraged about the Syria operation in the first place.

Iran was.

And everyone was talking about what their response would be.

No one was like, oh, gosh. I can't believe they did that.

Some people did, of course.

Look, there was 150 countries, that voted not -- that voted to condemn Israel, over the whole Gaza situation.

And when given the opportunity, I think it was Austria, that proposed an amendment that said, hey. Shouldn't we condemn Hamas for October 7th in this thing?

Ask they voted no.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Of course, they said no to that.

At some level, you can't care at all, what some of these countries think.

They will just think, Jew equals bad.

But I think to not make this go over the top. And flame out of control.

And also, get and done, that you're completely justified for. And will benefit for your country.

If you can walk that line. If there's another target like that. That seems highly justified and appropriate.

What do you think? You're not an idiot, right? You're a doctor.

GLENN: I'm a doctor, so I'm not an idiot.

STU: Do you notice this? Does anyone in the audience, even notice he does this? He asks these tough questions, and he never gives his own answer. It's pathetic.

GLENN: Because I'm trying to move the show. I'm trying to move the show.

STU: Move the --

GLENN: See, you don't want me. You don't want me anywhere near the buttons of any -- for any country.

Because we would run out of missiles quickly.

Because I have -- I have a short attention span.

And I also have a short fuse. It would be like, hmm. They did what.

Yeah. Launch.

I would be over there, saying, the world is going to hate us, anyway. They're building a nuclear weapon supply.

We know now what they're capable of doing from the sky. That's great. But if they get a nuclear weapon over our border, any way, shape, or form.

Millions will die.

And we know they're serious. And the rest of the world, can say whatever they want. But take up out their nuclear facilities.

STU: In country.

GLENN: In country.

STU: Look, he's been wanting to do it for a long time. And I think that's entirely justified.

GLENN: He has to. He has to.

No one in the world will do it, until he ignites one of those things.

STU: That is true. It probably does extend this though, right?

That's the risk.

GLENN: Oh. It's going to --

STU: Netanyahu has been wanting to do this forever, and I think has been looking for an opening to do it.

GLENN: Justifiably so.

STU: Justifiably so. Again, I'm not being critical. If I were Israeli. I think probably I would be for a much more aggressive response.

GLENN: Enough is enough.

STU: But I'm not. And I'm -- I'm thinking more selfishly frankly as an American.

GLENN: Yeah. Me too. Me on top.

STU: I think that's appropriate for us to do. America first is a dumb sort of slogan, but also very true.

It's also misused by many factions over the years.

GLENN: Yeah. Correct.

STU: But, I mean, it is the appropriate priority list for the United States.

GLENN: If you're going to take care of somebody, you don't swamp the lifeboats. That is what we're doing with our border. We're swamping the lifeboats.

How had we help anybody, if we can't help ourselves?

How will we help anybody, if we're fighting terror here?

I don't want terror here. But we've already swamped the lifeboats with a whole bunch of terrorists, apparently that are already here.

But we're not doing anything about it. So my America first kind of has to go to, let Israel do what Israel cares to do.

They can handle it. They're big boys. They can handle it. We'll handle our thing over here.

Now, with that being said. I know that Iran will not let us get away with that.

Iran will immediately activity. They're already activating the people. Who do you think. Hamas is paid for by the Iranians. So when you're in New York City. And you're holding a Hamas flag, you are doing the bidding of the Iranians.

So they're already here. And it's coming. And I would like to delay it, quite honestly, as long as possible.

But, you know, let Israel be Israel.

By the way, we have a news from Israel's Channel 12 News. They carried a report, that the country's Air Force, which includes US-made 16s, fifteens, and F-35s are already gearing up to deliver a retaliatory counterstrike against Iran.

According to the report, the strike will be intended as a message that Israel will not allow an attack of that magnitude, to pass without reaction.

That's actually good. That's a good reaction from them. Because doesn't that sound limited?

I'm just looking for happy things.

Turning rocks. Oh, no. That's a friendly worm. That's a friendly bug.

The strike intended a message, Israel will not allow an attack of that magnitude, to pass without a reaction.