RADIOJuly 22, 2025

How Obama & Hillary Clinton orchestrated Russiagate

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released evidence that she says proves the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton campaign orchestrated the Russiagate hoax to frame President Trump as a Russian asset. Glenn Beck runs through the timeline and ties it to the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up and first Trump impeachment.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let's start it again, at the very beginning. Because you're not hearing this from anybody in the mainstream. Barack Obama is president 2016. Hillary Clinton is expected to be the winner. She then starts because it starts to get dicey. She's looking for anything she can do to smear Donald Trump.

She then starts to put together the crossfire hurricane file. The crossfire hurricane file is completely discredited.

I mean, there's nothing in it that was real. It shows that Donald Trump was with hookers in Russia. That Russia. He and Russia have a bank account that are pinging each other all the time.

Remember all of this? Okay? That all came from Hillary Clinton, through crossfire hurricane. Or I'm sorry.

Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS puts together the Steele dossier.

When she loses, she goes to the White House and Clapper who was part of all of this stuff with Hillary Clinton, goes to the White House. And Barack Obama does not want Donald Trump in.

He's got to find a way to stop Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton is saying, Russia stole the election.

Remember? We never say they stole the election. Yeah. You did. All about Donald Trump. He's not a legitimate president. He stole it, in collusion with Russia.

So Barack Obama is about to get a report. An assessment from the intelligence community. It's called an ICA. Intelligence Community Assessment. And it was about to say, there was no collusion with Russia. That Russia was not capable of hacking into anything. Or doing anything to throw our election.

All right. He stops that, before it's printed. He's alerted that it's coming in print form. He says, stop. Meet me in my office tomorrow.

Bring all the players in. I want to have a talk with you. He has a talk with them. I need this to read this way: That Russia did influence the election.

Then after he gets that from the -- he gets a new ICA, saying that, yes. They did.

Now, he can go to the FBI and say, they did. Here's this crossfire hurricane. Here's this Fusion GPS. I need to you look at this, from Christopher Steele.

Christopher Steele is known by the FBI. They fired this guy.

He was somebody who was a source. But he had so discredited himself. He no longer had been on the payroll of the FBI. He had been discredited by the FBI.

But for some reason, they overlooked that, to make sure that this went through. Clapper releases the Fusion GPS documents.

To the press. And now it's in the press. Now everybody is talking about it.

Now we have to do an investigation on this. As he orders the FBI -- I want you to look into this.

I mean, want you to look into this Fusion GPS thing. You know, Christopher Steele dossier.

That's when -- not Condoleezza, but Susan Rice writes on her last day: He didn't tell the FBI what to do. He was just making a suggestion, that they would do what they should do. And they normally always do.

All right. So there's the seed of all of this conspiracy. When Trump wins, panic sets in.

So they -- they've got to do something.

All right. So that's what happens. In the meantime, as they're burying all of this true information. And leaking information to the press. That brings everybody to Russia. There's another scandal that is happening.

And this one is in Ukraine. This scandal is on a totally different front. This is -- at the same time, all this stuff is happening, Hunter Biden is on the board of Burisma. Corrupt gas company, raking in millions of dollars with no experience.

And the Ukrainian prosecutor is investigating that company. And Joe Biden comes back and he brags about getting him fired by threatening to withhold a billion dollar USAID package. Hillary Clinton's peoples are there. Soros is there.

All the usual suspects are there. This is a State Department operation over in Ukraine.

This is USAID. All of this stuff is happening over in Ukraine.

As soon as Donald Trump calls to talk to the new Ukrainian president, and the Ukrainian president says, hey, we have some real problems with Russia. He says, fine, I will send that to you.

But I would really like your help in looking into all the corruption that was going on. Corruption that was perpetrated by whom?

The same exact players that were in President Obama's office, with all of this.

They panic. Now we really have to stop Donald Trump. So they complain -- they make up a story, that he had said, I am going to hold back your aid, unless you produce this evidence!

Pretty much, remember, they always do what they say we're doing. Pretty much exactly what Obama and his group had done in 2016, they're now accusing Trump of doing, in Ukraine. You follow? Does this make sense?

He's asking them, can you tell me what happened? And he's now impeached, over that.

Now, let that sink in. The same people who manufactured a Russia hoax, now impeach a sitting president for trying to expose the people who were involved in that corruption.

It's projection, it's insurance. And it's a cover-up that has to keep covering. But they weren't finished.

But before the 2020 election, all of a sudden, a Hunter laptop appears. And what do they say?

This is Russian disinformation. When it looks like somebody is going to print it, somebody is going to run with it. What do they do?

The same exact people in the FBI and intelligence community, go to the social media companies. And say, this is a Russia hoax.

And then how many -- how many former intelligence officers sign that letter.

Who put that letter together?

Clapper, the same guy that was in the original meeting where Suzanne rice says, nothing weird happened here.

And Clapper puts that together, and says, this is all a hoax. So now, they're covering again!

All the emails. All the contracts. All the corruption.

Same cast of intelligence officials. Sign that public letter. This is all Russian disinformation.

Another lie. Another operation. And, again, the press continues to listen to these people, like Clapper, who is now, I think on a payroll of one of these companies. You know, as a press commentator.

Then what happens?

Then you have president Obama. Sorry, President Biden winning.

He wins.

But then what happens?

You've got to take Trump out.

So you have January 6th.

And, yes. It was chaotic.

Yes, people acted shamefully.

Some of these were real anarchists. I don't know what their political belief was.

But some of them were anarchists. But there's some questions about January 6th.

Where is the pipe bomb?

Where is the pipe bomber?

There were two pipe bombs.

One of them almost killed the -- the vice president.

Why was she moved from the capital, to the DNC headquarters, where the pipe bomb was?

Why did that happen? How did all of a sudden, every single record from the Secret Service, just disappeared. All their phone records. All the records of why she was moved. All of that, just gone. It just disappeared. It happens, you know. Why couldn't we get -- there was no camera on the pipe bomb and who placed that pipe bomb.

Why? The camera was aimed at the same place, for at least six months. Then right before this happens, it's moved in another direction. Right after they find the pipe bomb, it's moved back into that direction.

Why?

Why -- why did they never look for the scaffold man?

The guy who was up on the scaffolding, directing the crowd what to do.

We don't even know what to do. We don't know his name.

How about Ray Epps?

How about people from the FBI and the intelligence community, that said, there were no FBI agents on the ground that day.

There were no CIA or FBI operatives on the ground.

Then it was, we don't know if there were any.

And then, once they lose this election, we find out, there were 25 of them, on the ground. Why?

Why did the surveillance tapes, that were held back, suddenly contradict the sworn testimony of the hero cop?

He wasn't even in the part of the building he said he was in!

But nobody covered that.

We did. Same cast of characters involved in that.

A chance to do to Trump, what they failed to do with Clinton and Obama.

What they failed to do under Schiff, and impeachment.

Now they're trying to get him with January 6th.

But that doesn't hold. So now what do they do?

Now, the same group of people, the same whys, in many cases.

They decide, they are going to prosecute Donald Trump. And they are going to try to get him thrown into jail.

Find him guilty of a crime. Any crime.

You know, to protect democracy.

It's going to stop Hitler. But listen to what these people have done. They lied to a FISA court.

They tried to evidence.

And then testified at a FISA court. Which violates your -- your rights as an American citizen.

They then falsified intelligence.

They spied on a campaign.

Illegally.

They framed a sitting president.

Not once. Not twice. Counting still, three times? They silenced the entire laptop story.

They controlled the press. They opened our borders, while lying about the effects and the causes. Remember, she was going on to a fact-finding mission. To find out, what was causing all these people.

They knew what was causing them.

It was their own NGOs that they were paying through government funds to bring all those people in!

They never told you that. In fact, they lied about it.

Putting people up in hotels. That's ridiculous.

That's exactly what they did.

Then they lied about their involvement in bringing them across the borders.

They lied about the Medicare, going to the illegals, that were just finding out now.

The same people who told you MS-13 gangs and gangs from Venezuela, were not happening. Or they were not dangerous.

They were racist tropes.

The same people that let terrorists. And terror cells into our country.

And then sent the exact same people back to the press, to tell us that our borders were secure.

And then finally, lied about the president's mental fitness. They used the auto-pen to pardon, all or some of those involved in all of this.

Then when Biden was found and seen to be incompetent, he wasn't removed from office. He was just removed from election. No one asked any questions. The same people. Clapper. Rice. Brennan. Obama.

And then Obama and the Klan decided to run Kamala Harris.

They decided that. Not the people.

They decided to run him. Or run her.

And, again, no questions were asked.

The press even went from, she's the absolute worse, to two days later.

She is the savior of our republic.

And now, these same people are claiming their Fifth Amendment rights, when asked a simple question.

When did you know?

Did you know the president was incompetent?

That's what this is about.

This is about the biggest conspiracy -- this is about the Deep State.

If you think the Epstein thing was big, you're never going to get the Epstein.

You'll never get the truth of the Epstein, until this is stopped.

This is the entire narrative of the last ten years. And a cabal of maybe ten to 20 people, that have orchestrated all of it.

That's why it's on page A15, and not even found on the Washington Post today. This is massive!

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.