RADIOJuly 24, 2025

TOP SECRET document reveals Russia’s REAL plan for 2016 election?

DNI Tulsi Gabbard has released a top secret document, only ever seen by a handful of people, that appears to reveal the truth about Russiagate: Russia never had dirt on Trump. It had dirt on Hillary Clinton ...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I received a -- a -- what's called embargoed document, early this morning.

And it was embargoed until about two hours ago.

And so we spent the last two hours, trying to go through it. And understand what it says.

And it's from Tulsi Gabbard. And it is explosive document.

And you will understand how -- how important this document is. In just a minute. And I'm going to show you tonight, on chalkboard, I'll lay all of this out on the chalkboard tonight.

It's hard to follow, just by talking about it.

STU: Yeah. It will be helpful to have the chalkboard. By the way, you can also get the exact documents online right now. At GlennBeck.com.

Before you go to the new information. I'm trying to see if I trace this back correctly.

Before the election, Trump is -- there are these accusations against Trump. Which are in the Steele dossier. That everyone has inside the government.

And they have already said, there's nothing here.

Right?

These are discredited.

They then have a very surprised election result.

So they were not planning on necessarily using it.

They didn't think they had to.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: But then they lose the election.

And now, afterward, they are trying to think about how to thwart Donald Trump as the president.

GLENN: Yeah. Get him out of office. Or at least shut him down.

STU: Shut him down.

They are planning on releasing a PDP to the president.

Which will be on record to everybody. Including Trump and Flynn.

That says nothing there, with the Russians. There's nothing there.

GLENN: Yeah. Electronically.

STU: Electronically.

Nothing there. And they then, before that anxiety out, Obama or --

GLENN: It was Obama. No. It was Obama. It was on record.

We have it documented.

STU: That he said, look, let's delay. Let's have a meeting first. Don't put that in writing. Okay?

They have some meeting. They decide, in that meeting, that they are going to present this, instead as actually the Russians are trying to help Trump.

We have -- and the evidence for this is the Steele dossier.

GLENN: Correct. Which they all knew would have been discredited. Or it would have been released earlier.

STU: Right. CIA and FBI have problems with this. They express these problems in writing. They say, hey. What information do we have?

GLENN: Right.

STU: In writing. Brennan says, we don't have any information. We are moving forward. This is what the president wants.

That new briefing, finds its way into the New York Times the next day. Right?

From, quote, unquote, intelligence sources.

GLENN: Probably Brennan.

STU: Which lays the groundwork for everything that happens after.

GLENN: Correct. Okay.

So now, Obama says yesterday, that, you know, there's nothing here.

There's nothing new.

Apples and oranges.

You're comparing different things.

Okay. Well, that all falls apart, when you see what they didn't put in.

Remember, what they did was they said, Russia was in the bag for Donald Trump. And he's going to be a puppet, because they have so much dirt on him. As found in the Steele dossier.

Okay?

But here's what we did have. And this is the released memo.

You have to read. Just for history. You have to just look at it.

Because there's probably only 25 people in the world, that had seen this document. Okay?

STU: Before today.

GLENN: Before today.

This document, there were only five paper copies.

It is so top secret.

That it was not allowed to be put on any kind of digital format. And it was all kept in the highest level safe. Okay?

Donald Trump saw it, at the end of his administration.

This is the document that he said, I want that released.

And then they didn't release it. Remember?

On his last day, he's like, I want this -- I declassified it.

At this particular time released. After he left office, they didn't declassify it.

And they didn't release it.

And it is also most likely, the document that they were looking for, when they went to Mar-a-Lago.

Because that Mar-a-Lago raid, made no sense.

Made no sense.

This happens all the time.

Every president, as you saw with Joe Biden. What?

Three days later, he had stuff in his garage that was top secret.

They were looking for go particular.

And what they were looking for is this document. This document now is at GlennBeck.com, released two hours ago. The -- this is the highest level of top secret we have. So what's in the document?

The document details SDR, which is the Russian foreign intelligence service. And the reports from 2016, from Russia, about the hacking of the DNC. Remember? They were hacked?

And nobody could figure out with who can hacked them. And there was never anything about -- and everybody was like, what. There's no big deal. No big deal.

Why was that no big deal. Do you remember that?

And nobody seemed to care about it.

It was like, really, no big deal.

Well, in this report. It shows, it was a very big deal.

Because out of that hacking, the Russian foreign service, at least this is the information they got from Intel. On the Russian foreign service.

That they had the Intel now, that Obama and the Democratic leaders were -- and I'm quoting, extraordinarily alarmed about Clinton's health, calling it a potential serious negative impact on her chances. Type 2 Diabetes. Ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Plus, listen to this.

I'm quoting: Intensified psycho emotional problems. Uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness.

That last one is -- I mean, I would have said, this has no credibility at all.

I've never seen her -- she was also, according to the intelligence, that they got from the Russians, based on the DNC hacks, she was allegedly also on heavy tranquilizers every day. Obsessed with power.

And afraid of losing.

Russia also knew about the alleged secret meetings where Clinton allegedly offered State Department favors to religious groups for campaign support.

Ethical scandals galore, including pressure on the FBI, over her email probe. Via high-ranking DOJ official. Russia had all of this. All of this.

And then we had the Steele dossier.

From a discredited FBI source, that said, Russia has pictures of him giving golden showers.

Now, they are saying, the Steele dossier. Which they had already discredited.

Obama says, go back, they said, we have no new information.

Go back, and use this.

And show that Russia was trying to get Trump to win.

He was trying to help Hillary Clinton lose, because he had all this dirt on Hillary Clinton. On Donald Trump.

So he could be a puppet.

But the facts, showed the exact opposite.

Now, does this sound familiar?

This is what the left always does. Whatever they're accusing us of doing, they're doing.

The Russians actually had all the dirt from the DNC hacking, or at least we believed they had it.

This official Russian report.

That they had all the dirt on Hillary Clinton.

Now, if Putin was really trying to win, why wouldn't he drop these nukes?

Why wouldn't he have pushed these things out?

Instead, they seek milder stuff.

And they are trying to undermine democracy overall.

They're trying to split us.

They're not electing Trump.

They're trying to divide us.

They don't -- they think Hillary Clinton is going to win.

And they think that this is going to be good for them. Because they have all of this stuff.

They also, according to sources, they're also kind of afraid of her.

Because she seems unstable. Okay? So what does Obama did? He says that Russian actions show, they have a clear preference for Trump. But they admit all of the reports from Putin's advisers, warning a Trump win, could mean a Republican Congress, hostile to Russia.

Remember, we said, Donald Trump is more -- he's stronger on Russia than any president has been since maybe Reagan.

What are you talking about? He likes Russia. He's really strong against Russia. In compared to anybody else.

Remember, Hillary Clinton was like, I'm going to do a reset. The Steele dossier, is then shoe horning. Being shoe horned in to this document, as delicious reporting on Putin's intentions. Despite the CIA's intentions, despite the CIA vets who are going into Brennan's office on the record.

We have documents proving that they went to and said, you can't do this!

This is -- this is DNC opposition research. Unverifiable hearsay. Fabricated claims. Regurgitated media stories. You can't do this.

Steele has been fired from the FBI because he was lying to the FBI.

And you can't -- you're going to misrepresent it as legitimate Intel from an FBI source. With a layered network, and omit all bias.

All the payments. All of the sub sources that are unknown and unvetted.

And we are going to also not include the stuff, that we know they have from the DNC hack about Hillary Clinton?

Brennan's response to his team is, yeah. But on Donald Trump.

Doesn't that ring true?

Well, no.

That's not facts. That's an opinion.

That's advocacy.

Doesn't that ring true.

That's not the way. And they point this out.

That's not the way.

That's a violate of how we do Intel.

So Obama orders the new guidance, limited coordination, no broad peer review at all, and a publish before Trump takes off office.

This is a coup. This is a lie. This was all manufactured. Now, Obama denies all of it. But today, only five copies existed only in paper.

And they were all in the most confidential safe of the United States government.

And released to two hours ago.

That show all of this!

So why hide the part about Clinton?

If you were actually doing something. You could say, we have this from the Steele dossier.

But we also have this, we know Russia has, on Hillary Clinton.

But they don't do that.

Instead, they say, Trump is a Russia puppet.

And completely leave out, that what they're really wanting is to be the puppeteer of Hillary Clinton.

It's all released today.

You tell me.

Does this matter?

Does the president -- the former president of the United States, instructing the CIA to change course. To allow them, and encourage them to leave out really important facts.

Use something that had already been discredited.

And then within a few hours, before anyone of this had been done, start a whisper campaign, and leak to the New York Times, that CIA officials are now looking into some pretty serious charges about Donald Trump.

This was planned and coordinated. And it goes all the way to Mar-a-Lago.

Because this is the document they thought he might have.

They to get rid of this document. They did not want him to release this document.

But don't worry, if we get it out of his hands. Which he didn't have.

If we get it out of his hands, well, we'll put him in jail. So he will never be able to tell this story anyway.

And the -- the DNI, Tulsi Gabbard, comes out today, and releases this document.

It's all at GlennBeck.com.

And we will have the full chalkboard on this, tonight, at 9 o'clock.

RELEASE the Epstein Files … with a caveat

Glenn Beck wants EVERYTHING in the Epstein Files to be released … BUT with a caveat. Glenn warns that America will have massive problems if the files are released and people don’t actually READ the report. If we only listen to X posts and the media, we can be easily manipulated.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Somebody asked me. Might have been you, Stu. Said, why do you think they're putting up a stink about releasing the files?

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: I can guarantee you, that Donald Trump's name is in the Epstein files.

STU: You said that at the very beginning.

GLENN: Years ago.

STU: Even with that -- more recently when Elon came out with his tweet. And we all said, of course, he's in the files. He was friends with this guy for a long time, but before people knew.

GLENN: Right, and he broke up with him, if you will.

STU: Before his initial arrest.

GLENN: Right, before the initial arrest. And he broke up with him, because it's like, hey, you treat women like crap. Okay. So, yeah.

He is in the filing. I can almost guarantee it. So why wouldn't you want that out?

For the same reason he's saying, you know, there's a lot of people in here, whose names are going to be involved, who may not have done anything.
That's not just protecting him. You know what that is? That's a comment on us. Because here's my stance on this. The whole thing should be released.
Every bit of it should be released. However, there is a competing argument in my own mind that says, not responsible enough for that. What do I mean by that?

This system of our government is wholly inadequate for an immoral and non-religious society.

And I don't mean, well, our society has got to go to church.

I mean, you have to have the underpinnings of things like the Ten Commandments.

Don't lie!

Don't cheat. Don't steal.

Don't smear your neighbor. We don't do any of those things. Okay?

We can't even do ten simple laws. Okay?

And they're all good safety tips. I don't know occasion if I renamed all of these things.

If I didn't use the religious context, every American would say, yeah. Well, that's a good thing.

Hey. You shouldn't worship your car.

Yeah. That's a good thing. You know, you shouldn't -- you shouldn't look at the image of somebody, and go, that's -- that's who I serve.
That's my God. No! That is a bad thing.

Don't cheat on your spouse. Don't lie.

Honor your mom and dad. All of these things, we would all agree, we can't do that as a society! We can't even agree on eight of the ten!
So how are you going to remain free? Let me bring this back to the Epstein file.

All of this information should be public. It should be out there. There should be no secrets.

Unless it is in our national interests.

And I don't mean, well, it could go badly for the CIA.

Good!

Let it go badly for the CIA. If they did something wrong, or they were doing something nefarious. Or they were doing something that the American people just wouldn't like. I want that exposed.

Okay?

But are we responsible enough to have all of the information?

I contend, no!

That doesn't make me say. I'm still saying, release it all!

But I'm telling you, the consequences will be ugly.

STU: It could be a mess.

GLENN: A mess.

STU: That's okay. Probably.

Because we're talking about -- if there's information in there, that the American people need.

GLENN: I think we are approaching a place to where it's -- it's not just a mess.

And here's why I say that.

STU: What do you mean?

GLENN: So you get all this information. How is this information going to be used?

Of course, Donald Trump's name is in there.

Is Donald Trump -- did he -- was he messing around with young girls?

No. No.

STU: Is there even an accusation.

I mean, there's a lot of things they accused Donald Trump of.

GLENN: Not that.

STU: Is this even an accusation that he was interested in underage girls?

GLENN: No. No. No.

And all they're saying is, he's in the file.

Well, there will be a lot of people in the file. Okay?

A lot of people in the file.

And some of them might be guilty.

Some of them, you -- I worry, because I want to know their names. But I want to hear, why were you with him?

Oh, it was before you knew.

Oh, it was this or that. You were getting money as a scientist, for your thing. From him. Okay.

But it wasn't about underage girls. As a society, we will not read the Epstein report.

We won't.

STU: No. Of course not. Right?

We won't read it. It doesn't matter if it's ten pages! The vast majority will not read it. What they will do is they will go to Twitter and X. And they will look for what name is in there.

And somebody will say, Donald Trump. And you know what you know this means? He was diddling with little girls.

And that will just become their opinion, not based on fact, not based on anything.

Except, somebody who has ill will on anyone or is just as stupid as the rest of the public.

Yesterday, this -- last week, this file came out from Tulsi Gabbard. And what do you say this is, Stu?

One hundred fifty pages, maybe. One hundred pages?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Okay. My staff read it. We read it. You know why?

Because you weren't going to read it. And my job is to make it easier for you to understand what is going on.

My job really is not to tell you, what is going on.

I'm -- my job is actually to try to give you perspective on why it's happening, and what it means.

But because nobody -- and I'm not dissing you. This is a very, well-read audience.

In many cases, more well-read on some things than we are.

But generally speaking, the American people don't read.

They don't read these reports.

This one came out yesterday, and what is this?

20 pages, maybe?

And this thing is unbelievable. Because there were only five copies of it.

This was the -- they categorized the highest level of top secret outside of a nuclear weapon in our codes.

Okay. This was in the most top -- this was like the knock list, at the CIA.

Five copies, all in one -- in one safe. Where the most confidential CIA stuff is kept.

And it was released yesterday.

And it's not 30 years old.

It's four!

Did you read it? Did anyone actually -- I contend, very few reporters, very few talking heads on cable TV even read these.

STU: Yeah. And, by the way, it's not an unreasonable expectation for a population to have a media that is going to inform them properly about very lengthy government documents.

GLENN: Correct. Correct.

But once you have seen that that media is not reliable.

And everybody knows that now.

You may not find me reliable.

But the person who doesn't find me reliable, also probably doesn't find CNN reliable.

They might go, well, they're a little better than he is.

But they -- they don't trust anybody.

And they shouldn't.

At this point, you shouldn't trust anybody.

Which means, you have to know it for yourself. So when you're looking at the Epstein files. You're looking at these files.

These files, everyone should care about. Because this shows. This -- it's not new. Some of it is!

But very little of it is new.

It's just authentication that what has been said, all these years, by people like me, is accurate!

And you wouldn't have fought about its accuracy, if it didn't matter.

But you fought -- he didn't know what he was talking about. That's a conspiracy theory. He has to be shut down. Get him off Facebook. Take him off Twitter.

He can't say these things. Why would you say that if it didn't matter? Now you not only that know those things are true, but you now see a pattern of behavior. It's like looking at one murder, and then another murder, and then another murder.

Okay. We've got three murderers, on the loose now.

And then all of a sudden, you realize, wait a minute. Not only did those murders happen, it was the same guy. Now you have a serial killer.

Is a serial killer more -- a higher priority than just one murderer?

Yeah.

Yeah. It is. Because they are -- they are killing people -- I don't know. Out of the love of it. Out of their distorted.

It's not a crime of passion. It becomes something really, really sick.

This is a serial killer.

You now have not just one offs. You see, this is a pattern.

This group has been doing this from the beginning. You know what I said, you know, if they can get away with this. They will keep doing it.

This shows, they got away with it, for so long.

By 2016. They just, they don't care anymore.

They don't care anymore.

But how many people are reading this?

What they'll do is they'll listen to people like me, or people like CNN, and they'll say, oh, well. I heard Jake Tapper talk about it.

It means nothing.

Well, now, Jake Tapper might not mean -- let me leave you with a better example. I really like Andy McCarthy.

I really like him.

I read his work.

STU: It's great.

GLENN: I believe -- I believe his opinion is valid. I don't think it's right.

But I think it's valid.

And I read his work. And I thought, okay.

Wait a minute. If Andy McCarthy is saying this. I really need to examine what he's saying. And see where I disagree with him.

And as I went in, I was prepared to change my mind, if I thought Andy was right.

Now, he might in the end, be right.

But I don't think so.

Because what he is saying is, a lot of this stuff is old news.

Yes, Andy, it is. But it's now a grand conspiracy. You have to look at the through-line.

You're not looking at the one-off events.

You're looking at two things.

One, it's now been verified at the highest sources in writing.

You have whistleblowers, at the time, writing saying, we can't do this.

We didn't have that information. You have on record now, Brennan saying, you don't know what I know. Well, what did you know? We have new information.

What new information?

Because none of it is quoted anywhere.

And he's never answered the question.

What new information?

Most importantly, you have the grand conspiracy line.

We are not going to save the country, unless we do our own homework. Then listen to people and say, let me start at the opposite ends. Let me start with Glenn Beck and CNN.

And let me see what both of them are saying. Okay.

I think they both agree on this one thing. So I know that's true. But I think Glenn is more right. Or CNN is more right on this.

And then you just keep narrowing it in. And all it does is not form your opinion. It helps verify for you what you think is right.

Or it changes your opinion, because you realize, I missed that.

I didn't understand that. So when we're looking at all of this stuff needs to be transparent. We need to know all of the information.

Yes, we do.

But we also are played, every single day by many times, the exact same actors, who do not have a good bone in their body.

They're trying to destroy us. They're trying to separate us and divide us.

And they have proven themselves to lie at any level, without thinking about you or the ramifications.

And we continue to listen to them, over and over and over again.

How California's inevitable FUEL CRISIS could affect YOU

California Democrats have done it again! The state is scrambling to find a buyer for two local refineries which were driven away by the Democrats’ ridiculous policies. Glenn Beck explains how a gas shortage in California would affect the rest of the country.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Yeah. Let me talk to you a little bit about Democrats trying to find a buyer for a refinery. After they ran the refinery out of town, the California energy commission is reportedly actively seeking buyers to stop the closure of the Valero Refinery in Benicia, California.

Now, here's what happened: They're scrambling because they have driven all the refineries out of business in California.

They've got so much regulation, and more regulation coming.

They haven't built a new refinery in California, for decades he has

I think it's since the 1970s.

Now, this refinery is closing.

And the Phillips 66 refinery.

How many refineries are there in America? There's not a lot. The Phillips 66 Refinery is closing in -- at the end of this year. Valero is also closing. And they can't find a buyer!

Well, I wonder why, California. I mean, who would want to do that? Who would want to buy a refinery in California? Where they're constantly trying to put you out of business.

So you lose two refineries in California.

Who is going to make the gas?

Now, remember it's a special blend in California.

It's already $8 a gallon.

Because it has to be a special blend.

They have all of these things that are only for California.

So these refineries are making the special blend for California.

You lose two refineries. Two!
In the state of California. There's going to be a gas shortage everywhere else.

Why?

Because now it's going to go to the highest bidder.

Now they'll have to go out of state and say, to these other refineries, that are making our gas.

Can you make up for the loss of these two refineries?

Well, no. I'm providing gas for Texas, and Oklahoma. And New York.

And everything else. No, I can't. Look, we need gas. What would it cost?

Well, I mean, we could do it, but we will have to shut down for other customers. So, you know, I'm not going to charge you, the same I'm charging them.

You will see ten, 12-dollar a gallon gasoline, in California.

Because they will have to pay for it. They will have to pay for the refining, somewhere else.

And everybody else is at the top of their refinery.

Of their refining. So they have to put something offline. Which means, look, I'll do. I'll do a job for you.

You know, you need your house built. Well, I'm building this house over here.

And, I mean, I'm really. I have to take care of this house.

Yeah. What would it take for you, to build my house first?

Well, I mean, I don't know.

I've got to finish this one. I'll pay what it takes.

I have to have my house. That's what California is about to have to do.

I mean, what are you going to pay. And they still don't get it.

They still don't get it. They're still adding more EPA laws. More -- more laws about gasoline, in California.

And refining in California. Two refineries are about to shut down. And these people wonder why.

Oh, it's America. No, it's not.

No, it's not. I want you to -- if you happen to be under 30, I want you to listen to me, carefully.

Don't believe me, don't believe -- don't believe anybody.

Listen to yourself.

You have seen none of this works. And you have seen your older brothers and sisters, and they bought into all this crap that was taught in college. They bought into all of this stuff. And you see how empty it is for them.

Right?

You see it!

Be the exception. Because I believe the hero generation right now is between 12 and 30 years old.

These are the people that are going to change everything.

And I shouldn't design the country for you.

Because I'm going to be dead by the time this is fixed. I'll be dead.

It's your country. It's your future. It's your job.

So find truth.

You know -- you see your friends killing themselves. You see how empty everybody's life is.

You see how this is all falling apart. This is not capitalism's problem.

Capitalism -- we haven't done real, honest capitalism, like Wealth of Nations and moral sentiments.

We haven't done that in a while. This is captured capitalism. This is crony capitalism.

This is corrupt capitalism.

The free market. The free market works.

But what's happening is, you have these ruling classes. That are saying, nope.

I want it this way.

And you have dumb enough people to follow, and to not see, wait.

Those policies are putting me out of business. I mean, In-N-Out Burger.

Gone. Can't do business. It's a California company. Proudly Californian. Can't do business there anymore.

And you wonder why. It's not America's fault. It's not the Constitution's fault. It's your fault.

For voting that way, California. And these are the people like Gavin Newsom, I can guarantee you, they will not take responsibility. When gas is $12 a billion, they will be blaming it on somebody.

I mean, I wouldn't take had it their business as a refinery. Because I know, if I'm producing California fuel, at the top price, because I have to give up somebody else, and so they have to make it worth my while, I'm not going to take that. Because Gavin Newsom will say, you know who it is?

It's the Glenn Beck oil refinery that is charging us.

We have to go after him, because he's gouging us.

I'm not taking your -- no way. I'm not making anything for you.

Because you have no loyalty to the truth, at all.

You will not accept the fact that you put them out of business.

And now, when the people go, I can't afford 12-dollar a gallon gasoline.

You'll say, yeah. You know who is fault it is for him

That refinery with Glenn Beck in Texas.

They're just gouging our eyes. It's price gouging.

Get them!

No way.

You know this doesn't work.

You're smart enough to see what your brothers and sisters. And how miserable their life is.

They went to college.

I hope -- you know, I hope before you went to college. And you were indoctrinated.

But if you're watching your brothers and sisters go through college, and you see how they come back. And they're all screwed up.

And then you see them five years later, and they're empty inside. And they can't find a job.

And they don't have anything meaningful in their life.

You're finding meaning.

You're more conservative than I am.

You are finding God, at a time when God is lost, on most people.

And I'm not saying, finding church.

I'm saying finding God.

You know there's something spiritual out there, and you are searching for it. Don't listen to anyone.

Who is telling you, you're not good enough. Don't listen to anyone who is telling you, you don't get it.

Don't listen to anyone who says, the system is rigged against you!

Don't listen to anyone who says, vote for me, or your life is going to be a pile of dog crap. Only I can solve your problems. Don't listen to them. Don't.

The American dream was never about being rich.

It was about being free enough to make your own choices. Make your own choice. Carve it out. Your brothers and sisters. Who are slightly older than you. They've been convinced, they can't make it. You know what happens when you're convinced of something, and you keep saying it over and over again? It's not my fault.

I can't make it because of these guys. It becomes true.

What becomes true?

I can't make it. They'll never make it.

They'll never make it.

And I know this, because I grew up in a family that was really dysfunctional.

Alcoholics.

No one was successful in my -- in my family.

Nobody went to college in my family.

I didn't go to college in my family.

And believe me, I didn't get any special breaks. I worked my ass off. And I'm 13, 14, 15, 16 years old. And I'm sleeping on the conference room floor, on weekends, because I work six hours on, six hours off.

Six hours on. Six hours off.

From Friday afternoon, until 6:00 a.m. Monday.

And then go to school.

I worked my butt off.

But I knew if I worked hard, and if I could outthink everyone, that was in my business.

And I got a little lucky, I would be successful.

But it wasn't until my 30s, that I realized, no, it's not just that.

You have to be true to you.

You are special! Each one of us.

We're different.

We're born with what we need.

My first half of my career, I imitated.
I imitated. Because I couldn't do. So I imitated others. I took little ideas here and there.

And I pieced them together.

And I thought, that's a good idea.

That's a good idea.

And that worked to some extent, but until you realize, you are unique. You are the only one that can do you!

And in my case, you just don't care anymore, because you know what you're doing is not working. And so you just let go. I'm an alcoholic that lost everything. Believe me.

World is not stacked against -- you're stacked against yourself, when you listen to people who tell you, it can't be done.

You can't do it. System is rigged against you.

You'll defeat yourself every time.
Don't listen to those people.

Was the FBI Raid of Mar-a-Lago ALL about 'Russiagate' Documents?

As new revelations about Russiagate have come public, the 2022 FBI Raid of Donald Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago suddenly becomes much more intriguing. Was the raid done for the purpose of seizing documents related to Russiagate that would have exposed the entire hoax and all of the key players involved? We flashback to Glenn Beck's chalkboard breakdown of this theory and why it has become increasingly relevant now in 2025.