Is THIS Why Airplanes Keep FALLING APART?!

Is THIS Why Airplanes Keep FALLING APART?!

There have been a lot of alarming stories in the news lately about Boeing planes malfunctioning and falling apart mid-air. But media outlets like Wired are insisting that noticing this trend is just playing into a “far-right” conspiracy theory. So, what’s the truth here? Are there major problems with companies like Boeing and United Airlines? Are these problems intentional? Were they caused by DEI policies? And WHERE IS Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg?! Glenn breaks it all down and explains how China is taking advantage of it either way.


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So the USAID disinformation primer targets gamers, advertisers, memes, and the so-called right not to be disinformed.

And that's, of course, a civil right, that our Founders talked about all the time.

You know, that -- that right to not be disinformed.

Now, there are some conspiracy theories out this.

I found out from wired this -- this weekend. This information is pretty disturbing.

Over the past week, airplanes made by bogey, have been involved in numerous incidents.

Including, midair emergencies. Leaking hydraulic fluid. A wheel falling off a plane as it took off. Pilots losing control of a plane mid-journey.

One plane just mysteriously driving off the tarmac into the grass field.

And a plane plummeting and suddenly falling out of the sky, injuring 50 people. As a result, right-wing influencers and far right extremists are once again spreading a conspiracy theory that Boeing's problems are all due to the airplane manufacturer's supposed embrace of diversity.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Now, as a -- what am I? A far-right extremist, I guess is what they would -- a right-wing influencer, is I guess what they would call me. I don't think it's all of that. But I suspect that it plays a role.

This time around, they're even going further. Some are even claiming that accidents are happening intentionally.

And Boeing is failing on purpose. As part of a global conspiracy to bring down western civilization.

And promote communism. And countries like China.

Well, now, that seems a little harsh. Now, James Lindsey, last week, was on Joe Rogan.

And I think that's pretty much what he is saying.

That they're doing it intentionally.

I haven't talked to James about this. But I don't think it's being done intentionally by bogey. I don't think Boeing is sitting around and going, you know what, we should fail, so China could take over.
Don't think that's happening.

I do think the DEI, is a direct -- this is a true and correct result of DEI. And those -- that kind of thinking.

For instance, when you say, let's reimagine the police, and fire a bunch of the police.

What the direct result, Stu, that we've seen?

STU: Usually, a lot of police, no longer wanted to be employed by those cities, and crime increasing. And people living much less safe existences.

GLENN: Yes, right. Huh. Okay. So there's -- there's one. There's one.

You know, when you -- when you start to promote transgenderism in school.

You know, the population is maybe one percent transgender.

But now schools are reporting, that up to 30 percent of the class, is claiming to be transgender. So do you think that is connected at all?

STU: You know, I don't know if scientific consensus has arrived at a theory yet, Glenn. But it does seem -- you know, correlation does not equal causation in some cases, Glenn. It's important to note that.

GLENN: There you go. There you go.

STU: But it is interesting that after all of these things that we've been talking about occur, we seem to see consequences that might be expected from them.

GLENN: Yes. Yeah. That's weird.

Now, these people are spreading all kinds of lies.

Are some even claiming accidents are happening intentionally. The claims began earlier this year, according to Wire. After a part of a Boeing-built Alaska airline plane blew off during a flight.

Far right figures claimed the airlines were now more dangerous, not because of the faults with production process. But because they force diversity, equality, and inclusion policies. Which conspiracy theorist claim, without any proof, resulted in putting unqualified flight crews into the cockpit.

The same far right figures are now claiming that Boeing's support of environmental, social, and governance ESG policies and DEI have led to plummeting standards in the manufacturing process.

Well, what else has happened at Boeing? What else -- I mean, I would love an answer.

I can't seem to -- where did I leave my Pete Buttigieg.

I can't seem to find him anywhere. I don't find an answer from him. But what else is happening?

STU: This is just not appropriate. Now, it is interesting, Glenn.

Even going back to old-school advertising. Right?

If you go back to old-school advertising.

You hear companies say, we are obsessed with quality. All we think about every day is how to make your experience better. How to make that food taste a little bit better. How to make that automobile the -- the perfect -- I mean, remember those videos they used to have in the commercials.

Where they would show the wind tunnels. Like the arrow dynamics. And focus on these tiny details that no car buyer would ever really think about when buying a car.

But the point was, they were so obsessed with their product.

You were getting someone who thought about that, all the time. That's all they cared about.

Therefore, they're getting the best experience. Now their commercials are, we never think about the product. All we do is think about how many vaginas have we employed?

How many people like having vaginas nearby when they're in bed! Whether they're women or whether they're men.

How many times -- how many boxes can we put on the little checkmark list, that when gender comes up, and they give you all of this nonsense.

How many. Wait. How many people, with the certain levels of melanin are employed here?

When they tell you, that's what they care about, it's pretty freaking natural to think, maybe quality isn't their main focus.

GLENN: Thank you for flying United Airlines, this is your non-white vagina speaking from the cockpit, which we don't really like. I don't like to use vagina and cockpit in the same phrase. But we're working on that.

This is really bad.

Okay. So I posted. I am in this article too. Because I posted last week, about the C919, which is the Chinese 737.

And when I say it's a 737, it's not.
Because a 737 says Boeing, and this one says Commack on the side.

Other than that, it's almost as if someone stole the plans of a 737 from Boeing. And is making now.

So they're starting to market their new 737.

What is Boeing going to do?

Boeing will go out of business, if it doesn't come up with the answers. I mean, are you going to fly United?

STU: Right now, I don't think it's a good idea.

GLENN: No, it doesn't. I'm not suggesting anything you know, I don't -- you know, you -- I never thought I would ever say this about Americans on American-made planes. But, hey, if you want to roll the dice, it's your life.

That's not a good slogan.

United. What the hell!

Roll the dice.
I don't think that's good. I don't think that's good.

So, you know, when people start noticing.

And it's fascinating to me, that everything is blamed on bowing.

I think this.

To me, this seems more like maybe it's a problem of maintenance from United.

But I don't know. Because I can't find my Pete Buttigieg. So I have no idea, whose problem is this? Whose fault is it?

My guess is they have either disgruntled or, you know, just really, really, really unqualified people working on the plane. You know, like, I don't know.

I just finished working on it.

These four screws were left behind.

But, you know, the IKEA furniture stands up without all those screws.

So I think you're fine. Clearer up.

You know.

It could be that. It could be Boeing. It could be a combination of both of them.

STU: It does --

GLENN: But isn't it interesting, that when you have the CEO of United come out in a dress.

And like, we're doing transgender script shows all the time. And our pilots and our stewardesses, the mechanics, they love it. They love it.

Look at me, I'm dressed as a woman now. What's your problem.

When he seems to be so focused, on drag shows, and DEI, I don't know.

Were the people at United Airlines just looking for a lot of -- they're like, everything is done.

Joe, it's 19:15 in the morning. I don't have a thing to do. Everything is running so great. Why don't we spend the day on diversity?

Now, maybe. But I kind of doubt it.

STU: It goes back to what you -- what you are focusing on as a company.

Glenn, you're a guy who collects watches. Ever since I've known you, you've collected watches. And the watch. The watch is expensive.

Usually, not because it can keep time like your i Phone.

Right? Like the craftsmanship is why it's expensive.

The stories you've told me.

GLENN: No. I know. But hang on just a second.

There's several reasons why things are expensive. One is image and brand.

And there's many watches that are much better. Like everybody thinks. Oh, Rolex watch, that's -- it's not. It's a good watch.

But it's not -- it's not a craftsman time piece, you know what I mean?

There are watches that will take a year-plus. To make. All made by hand, by one person. And they run forever, you know what I mean?

So there is something to say, that something is made of real quality and real craftsmanship. And I would say, that used to be Boeing.

And then there's those that are just really popular, that are, you know, like I would say, that's the F-35. And that doesn't really run.

Yeah. It will take off.

We hope that it will land.

And, you know, 70 percent of them aren't ready for any kind of combat.

But, hey, it's very popular and cool to look at, isn't it?

And then there's just crap.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And that's because the company doesn't care.

STU: Right.

And when you are in a situation like this. When you are having issues like, I don't know. Maybe people have noticed Boeing over the past few years, having issues.

One of the few ways you push back against that. Is to talk about how focused you are on quality.

Even in sports. You have teams that -- that they -- they are posting pictures of themselves out in clubs. Late at night. On Instagram. And doing these things.

And look, every single team, has players that go out to late dinners. And go to clubs, right?

That is the lifestyle of a 25-year-old athlete. Right?

Everyone knows that. But if you're constantly telling your fans, hey, we're out doing that.

People will think, well, hey. Why aren't you getting sleep. Why aren't you at the gym? Why aren't you working on your game? We all know that companies can do more than one thing.

Like, there's no reason, why Boeing theoretically couldn't have more efforts. They probably always had them at some level.

But they don't promote it all the time. The main thing your business does.

GLENN: After the 1970s, and all cars, and trucks were deemed worthless from America, because the quality was so bad.

What did Ford come up with for their slogan? Ford, where quality is job up.

STU: Hmm. Yeah. Job one!

GLENN: Okay. That's what you do!

Where is the advertisement for United, saying, we will get you there?

Because our pilots will die too. And we don't want them to die. Because they're drag queens.

Where is the safety? Where is Boeing saying that? Boeing should be leading the way on the news of what's happening in their company. And they're not. And it's almost, as if the mainstream media is doing everything they can, to keep -- can you imagine ten years ago, if any -- Glenn Beck airlines, United Airlines. Any airline had the problems that United Airlines was having right now. No one would fly them.

Because the media would only be talking about what's happening at United. That's causing all of these planes.

STU: Yeah. Totally.

You're totally right.

GLENN: That's all it would be.

STU: You have to get people to be comfortable that your plane won't take off from LA to New York. And have several other landings in the way in Omaha and Nevada. Right?

You have to be able to convince people that you can get people there in one piece. And I will add to your analysis of that, Glenn, the media would be non-stop on whoever the Transportation Secretary was under a Trump administration. You know their name. You would know everything about everything they were doing, every day.

How Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion WILL Create the Next Public Health Crisis | Glenn TV | Ep 348

How Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion WILL Create the Next Public Health Crisis | Glenn TV | Ep 348

Everything is a “public health crisis” these days. Racism. Climate change. The lack of access to “gender-affirming care.” But there’s one ACTUAL public health crisis the far Left has created: diversity, equity, and inclusion. The future of YOUR health care is at stake as this dangerous reform movement is being forced upon American medical schools, all of the professional medical organizations, and hospitals, with total endorsement from Biden’s White House. Glenn Beck exposes how this academic cancer is changing medical school admissions and graduates, what caused this movement to accelerate, the real-world life-and-death consequences of this insanity for patients, and how any resistance to this movement brings swift crackdown from the Thought Police. Glenn is joined by Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, the founder of “Do No Harm,” a network of doctors, nurses, medical students, and patients working to get identity politics out of medicine. Dr. Goldfarb taught medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and published more than a hundred articles in the New England Journal of Medicine and other top medical journals. He debunks the racist claim that “black patients need black doctors” and sounds the alarm on deadly efforts to push unqualified doctors on patients.

EXCLUSIVE: Will RFK, Jr. Change Glenn's Mind?

EXCLUSIVE: Will RFK, Jr. Change Glenn's Mind?

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. once called Glenn a traitor because he thought Glenn's opinions on climate change were "dangerous" and should be shut down. But now, he's one of the biggest CRITICS of censorship. So, what changed? Glenn decided to sit down with the independent presidential candidate to find out.

SHOCKING: You Need HOW MUCH Money to “Live Comfortably” in Each State?!

SHOCKING: You Need HOW MUCH Money to “Live Comfortably” in Each State?!

With inflation still on the rise, Glenn and Stu review another shocking number: how much money you need to “live comfortably” in America. The numbers have gone through the roof and it’s no surprise that the most expensive states are blue states. Thanks to inflation, a single adult now needs to make over $100,000 a year in order to live comfortably in many states. So, can you afford your state?


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So there's a new number out now, on what it costs to live in the United States of America. It's a little higher than it used to be.

And I -- I don't know if anybody has noticed they're having a hard time making ends meet.

Comfortable to live comfortably is defined as the monthly income, needed to cover a 50/30/20 budget, which allocates 50 percent of your earnings for necessities like housing and utility costs, 30 percent for discretionary spending, and 20 percent for savings or investments.

STU: Wow. I don't think a lot of people are living like that.

GLENN: Nobody is living like that. Nobody is living like that.

STU: That -- but wait. Percent of what? If you're making $10 million. You know. What is it -- you don't need to have a 50/30/20 lifestyle to live comfortably, right?

GLENN: Right. Right.

They're saying this is the minimum. This is what it takes to, you know, live comfortably. In America.

STU: So -- this is not talking about -- I think Jeff Bezos is pretty good. I don't think he needs an article.

STU: You're saying, they're basically reverse engineering the number you need to hit that. Is that what you're saying?

GLENN: Yes. Yes.

Okay. All right? Jeez.

STU: I was trying to understand.

GLENN: Here they are.

Most costly states: Massachusetts. $116,000.

STU: Hard-core conservative state.

GLENN: Hawaii. You'll see this a lot. Hawaii, 113.

STU: Another conservative -- red state.

GLENN: California, 113.

STU: Big red state there.

GLENN: New York, 111.

STU: Wow.

GLENN: I'm rounding out the top. Topping out the top five is Washington State, with 106.

STU: Another big red state. That's amazing. So $100,000, and you cannot live comfortably.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: That's incredible.

GLENN: Okay. Now, to live comfortably in these states, you need to earn double what most single earners typically make. The median income for a single full-time worker is around $60,000. The national median for living comfortably is $89,000.

So there's a shortage there.

STU: And those are statewide numbers to point out. It's a lot worse in these cities.

Like, there was a time. I don't know this is eight to ten years old now.

When I remember looking at this. They gave you these guide lines, what you need to earn to buy an average home in the market. In the market of San Francisco, the -- several of the players on the roster of the San Francisco giants, did not earn enough money, to buy the average home.

GLENN: It's crazy.

STU: In the market.

GLENN: So let me go through this. Alabama, to live comfortably, $83,000.

Alaska, $96,000.

And I don't know if that's ever -- I don't know if you're ever comfortable living in Alaska, unless you can change the climate completely.

GLENN: Yeah. Right.

Arizona, $97,000. Arkansas, 79

STU: Gosh.

GLENN: California, 113. Colorado, 103. Connecticut, 100. Delaware, 94. Florida, 93.

Think of that. In Florida, it's 93. In Colorado, it's 100. Georgia, 96. Hawaii, 113. Idaho, 88. Illinois, 95. Indiana, 85. Iowa, 83. Kansas, 84. Kentucky, 80. Louisiana, 82. Maine, 91.

Why? Bear traps? Maryland.

STU: That's a northeast state.

GLENN: Maryland, 102. Massachusetts, 116. Michigan, 84. Minnesota, 89. Mississippi, 82. Missouri, 84. Montana, 84. Nebraska, 83.

STU: A lot of these -- these are like the bargain basement states. You are having $85,000 to live comfortably.

GLENN: I know. Yeah.

STU: That's just putting away some money for retirement. That's not living -- you're not flying private.

GLENN: I know. Yeah, but you're not living paycheck to paycheck. If you would live that way. If you would do 50/30/20.

STU: Right. Right.

GLENN: Nevada, 93.

Nobody does that. Do you know anybody who is young, that put 20 percent of their salary away for savings?

STU: Depends what you mean by young. As you're starting out, you're just trying to make it, pay your bills. As you get older, you're trying to put some money away.

GLENN: 20 percent?

STU: It's hard to do.

GLENN: Really hard to do. Nevada, 93.

STU: By the way, 50/20/30. What are the taxes on this one? This is post-tax revenue, I assume.

GLENN: Yeah. Where are the taxes?

STU: Another 30 is going to taxes. So which part of it are you taking out?

GLENN: That's why nobody saves. New Hampshire, 98. New Jersey, 103. To live in New Jersey. New Mexico, 83. New York, 111. North Carolina, 89. North Dakota, 52.

STU: North Dakota. This is -- this is hwy people go to the Dakotas, I suppose. It's --

GLENN: Is it worth Dakota, though? You don't even have the presidential thing on the mountain, that Dakota.

STU: That's true. Was that the Doug Burgum state?

GLENN: Yes, it is. Fifty-two.

STU: You got those eyebrows. They are kind of like -- on the Mount Rushmore of eyebrows. I don't know if that counts.

GLENN: Ohio, 80. Oklahoma, 80. Oregon, 101.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Pennsylvania, 91. Rhode Island, 100. Oh, my gosh, for Rhode Island!

South Carolina, 88. South Dakota, 81. Tennessee, 86. Texas, 87. Utah, 93. Vermont, 95.
Virginia, 99. Washington, 106. West Virginia, 78.
That's a state you could live in. Wisconsin, 84. Wyoming, 87.


STU: First of all, the red and blue state is -- I don't know if it's perfect. It's darn close to perfect, as far as the difference is.

GLENN: It is. It is.

STU: You look at that, and you think -- it wasn't that long ago, that we would say, oh, my gosh, nap guy is earning six figures. Doing really well.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: That's just not even doing really well.


STU: It's the way you're supposed to plan for your future. And now you need to earn six figures, in most states. Or at least close to most states.

GLENN: And it's going to get worse. That's the problem. It will get worse.

How will companies be able to keep up with it? How is that going to happen?

GLENN: The presses.
STU: Yeah. But eventually, people can't afford to produce the products that people want, and people can't afford to buy the products that they need.

STU: I mean, you just recited the slogan for Bidenomics. That's exactly --

GLENN: Yes, I did. Starts bottom up. Bottom up. First people to be heard.

The bottom. And eventually, it's heard all the way up.

The -- in another remarkable story, the IMF has come out and said, that Biden has got to stop money.

Printing money, and spending money.

The International Monetary Fund, sounded the alarm on the Biden administration's rampant spending as, quote, out of line with what is needed for long-term fiscal stability.

STU: No!

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

STU: What? It feels like it's right in line with the exact -- what you're supposed to do with each budget is spend trillions of dollars than you have.

I thought that's the way you're supposed to be fiscally responsible. What is the 50, 30, 20 number for the United States right now? It's like 80, 50, zero. Eighty, 50, negative 30. Right?

That's what we're doing. The savings is negative 30 percent of the budget. We're spending mandatories, like 80 percent of what we have. Then there's another 50 percent discretionary. It's insanity. And we're getting to the point very soon. Just the interest on the money already spent will be more than our entire defense budget.

GLENN: We will have to borrow over a trillion dollars a year, just for the interest.

STU: My God.

GLENN: I mean, this is unsustainable.

And I really don't understand, why more people can't see this.

STU: You keep seeing this word.

I don't think it means what you think it means.

What Would Happen if Israel RETALIATED Against Iran's Missile Attack?

What Would Happen if Israel RETALIATED Against Iran's Missile Attack?

Iran’s attack against Israel made barely any impact (despite what Iran is telling its people). But will Israel strike back? It has the right to, and many Israeli leaders seem to want to, but SHOULD it? Glenn and Stu discuss whether it’s worth risking World War III, or whether Iran is too weak to do anything else.


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So let's just recap what we know now, what happened over the weekend with the Iranian attack on Israel. First of all, the Iran state TV used footage from the Texas fire. Also, there was footage of One Direction.

STU: The band?

GLENN: The band. And it was Israelis, panicking while under attack while under missiles and drones. Unfortunately, it was just a throng of excited One Direction fans.

STU: Wow, the fact that those things look the same, may make you rethink things if you're a One Direction fan.

GLENN: It really does. They also use a picture of a forest fire in Chile. So, you know, they're running all kinds of lies. I don't know if their people understand that they really made no impact at all.

STU: I'm kind of -- look, I kind of hope -- this is weird. I kind of hope they are able to convince their people, that they made an impact.
Because maybe this will somewhat calm down.

GLENN: So the president boasted the attack had, quote, taught a lesson to the Zionist regime. They were chanting with their fists in the air, death to Israel. Death to America. Yay. And Hezbollah supporters were out in the streets, of southern Beirut, honking their horns and celebrating.

And they warned that Jordan would be the next target, if it took any measures in Israel's defense.

So everybody is just like holding back.

Except for Israel. Now, my goals may not be the same goals, as the Israelis. My interests are, let's not have any terrorism here in America.

And let's try to bring peace to the world.

Israel has played this game for so long. They're not going to sit back. At least the word we're getting from their -- their war committee, was that it was a brawl.

The defense minister stated yesterday, that Israel's confrontation with Iran is not over yet.

The public security minister demanded a crushing attack, against Iran. Another minister, declared Iran's audacity in such an attack, must be erased.

Meanwhile, Iran's mission to the UN said, should the Israeli regime make another mistake. Iran's response will be considerably more severe.

And warned the US to stay away. Okay. I don't know what they can do with their -- their missiles. Quite honestly.

I think it was embarrassing. If that were us, well, that would be us. Because Joe Biden is in charge. Maybe Joe Biden helped them with planning of this mission. But that were us. That would be humiliating.

Absolutely humiliating.

And, I mean, it's the -- wouldn't you say, it was the most lopsided thing you have seen, possibly ever? With the amount that they fought back?

STU: Yeah. It goes back to a couple of examples. The first gulf war.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Remember that.

GLENN: Except they fought back. And they did hit targets. This one hit -- they say three -- the outside is ten. That they hit ten -- that missiles hit ten things. They fired over 300.

STU: 300, right. The other one that comes to mind. The way we reacted in Afghanistan, when the Taliban started taking it over again. We kind of just all ran. And that -- that seemed -- that was embarrassing. I was embarrassing that way. The way I think Iran should be embarrassed this way. That's if their intent is to actually get a lot of damage. Look, we have an alternate theory. We talked about it yesterday.

They floated a bunch of flying lawn mowers over there. With 12 hours notice for a reason.

To say, hey. Shoot all these town.

We don't want to start an international war. If we don't do something in our country. Our people will overthrow us.

GLENN: So you're sitting in Israel.

And I say, Stu. What are you going to do? Now, you're an Israeli.

You're in the defense cabinet. And I say, what are you going to do?

Because the whole world hates us right now?

And if we retaliate, then we're in trouble. Should we just walk away and call this thing?

GLENN: Again, there's so much to weigh here. And I'm an idiot. But I will tell you, my initial instinct is, you have a free hall pass to --

GLENN: No. No. No. No. Your first impression is you're an to it. I just don't want that to get lost.

STU: The second impression was --

GLENN: The first one was, again --

STU: I'm an idiot. Number two. And I should not be making these decisions for any nation. We should be clear about that. That's not a good policy, because I'm an idiot.

GLENN: Sure. You're an idiot. You could work for the Biden administration.

STU: I will say, maybe I should leave the country. This one here, because it seems that's the path to success these days.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: But I will say, what my thought would be, is you have a free hall pass to do another Syria type of operation. Right?

You can -- of course, are justified. If I was an Israeli, you would be justified to launch at least 300 missiles towards Iran. You're justified morally to do so.

However, what I would like to do is tamp this down, so it doesn't inflame into something worse. If you were are to do something like they did in Syria. Where you took over some important, overseas. Not in Iran. Type of operation. That would actually benefit you.

Not like as a show of power or strength. If you're Israel, you don't need to do that. What you need to do is do something that would actually benefit you.

And I think it would be difficult for the world to be all that upset.

If you went and did another operation like that.

GLENN: I forgot.

I was going to say, no. No. No.

STU: That's a smart answer for an idiot.

GLENN: I forgot you were an idiot. It would be tough for the world to say.

You remember, you're a Jew here.

STU: Right. So they --

GLENN: They can say whatever they want.

STU: They can say whatever they want.

GLENN: They're always the pad guy.

STU: But there is a line.

The world wasn't overly outraged about the Syria operation in the first place.

Iran was.

And everyone was talking about what their response would be.

No one was like, oh, gosh. I can't believe they did that.

Some people did, of course.

Look, there was 150 countries, that voted not -- that voted to condemn Israel, over the whole Gaza situation.

And when given the opportunity, I think it was Austria, that proposed an amendment that said, hey. Shouldn't we condemn Hamas for October 7th in this thing?

Ask they voted no.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: Of course, they said no to that.

At some level, you can't care at all, what some of these countries think.

They will just think, Jew equals bad.

But I think to not make this go over the top. And flame out of control.

And also, get and done, that you're completely justified for. And will benefit for your country.

If you can walk that line. If there's another target like that. That seems highly justified and appropriate.

What do you think? You're not an idiot, right? You're a doctor.

GLENN: I'm a doctor, so I'm not an idiot.

STU: Do you notice this? Does anyone in the audience, even notice he does this? He asks these tough questions, and he never gives his own answer. It's pathetic.

GLENN: Because I'm trying to move the show. I'm trying to move the show.

STU: Move the --

GLENN: See, you don't want me. You don't want me anywhere near the buttons of any -- for any country.

Because we would run out of missiles quickly.

Because I have -- I have a short attention span.

And I also have a short fuse. It would be like, hmm. They did what.

Yeah. Launch.

I would be over there, saying, the world is going to hate us, anyway. They're building a nuclear weapon supply.

We know now what they're capable of doing from the sky. That's great. But if they get a nuclear weapon over our border, any way, shape, or form.

Millions will die.

And we know they're serious. And the rest of the world, can say whatever they want. But take up out their nuclear facilities.

STU: In country.

GLENN: In country.

STU: Look, he's been wanting to do it for a long time. And I think that's entirely justified.

GLENN: He has to. He has to.

No one in the world will do it, until he ignites one of those things.

STU: That is true. It probably does extend this though, right?

That's the risk.

GLENN: Oh. It's going to --

STU: Netanyahu has been wanting to do this forever, and I think has been looking for an opening to do it.

GLENN: Justifiably so.

STU: Justifiably so. Again, I'm not being critical. If I were Israeli. I think probably I would be for a much more aggressive response.

GLENN: Enough is enough.

STU: But I'm not. And I'm -- I'm thinking more selfishly frankly as an American.

GLENN: Yeah. Me too. Me on top.

STU: I think that's appropriate for us to do. America first is a dumb sort of slogan, but also very true.

It's also misused by many factions over the years.

GLENN: Yeah. Correct.

STU: But, I mean, it is the appropriate priority list for the United States.

GLENN: If you're going to take care of somebody, you don't swamp the lifeboats. That is what we're doing with our border. We're swamping the lifeboats.

How had we help anybody, if we can't help ourselves?

How will we help anybody, if we're fighting terror here?

I don't want terror here. But we've already swamped the lifeboats with a whole bunch of terrorists, apparently that are already here.

But we're not doing anything about it. So my America first kind of has to go to, let Israel do what Israel cares to do.

They can handle it. They're big boys. They can handle it. We'll handle our thing over here.

Now, with that being said. I know that Iran will not let us get away with that.

Iran will immediately activity. They're already activating the people. Who do you think. Hamas is paid for by the Iranians. So when you're in New York City. And you're holding a Hamas flag, you are doing the bidding of the Iranians.

So they're already here. And it's coming. And I would like to delay it, quite honestly, as long as possible.

But, you know, let Israel be Israel.

By the way, we have a news from Israel's Channel 12 News. They carried a report, that the country's Air Force, which includes US-made 16s, fifteens, and F-35s are already gearing up to deliver a retaliatory counterstrike against Iran.

According to the report, the strike will be intended as a message that Israel will not allow an attack of that magnitude, to pass without reaction.

That's actually good. That's a good reaction from them. Because doesn't that sound limited?

I'm just looking for happy things.

Turning rocks. Oh, no. That's a friendly worm. That's a friendly bug.

The strike intended a message, Israel will not allow an attack of that magnitude, to pass without a reaction.