On Friday, NBC News released new, interesting details about the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi. But VERY soon after the Today Show report was posted online, it disappeared. Thankfully, Glenn’s team caught the video before it was erased forever. In this clip, Glenn plays that now-deleted report, which claims Paul Pelosi opened the door for police but then retreated back into the house. Plus, Glenn explains why he has a MAJOR problem with the New York Times accusing conservatives of spreading misinformation about the ordeal when THEY are the ones seemingly hiding the details…
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: NBC News pulled a report on Friday. That claimed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, didn't let on, that he was in danger, when cops showed up at his home, just prior to the hammer attack on him.
Now, here is a long time NBC reporter, you won't find anywhere. It has been erased.
I thought the internet was forever. Luckily, our servers are forever. Here's the report.
VOICE: Craig and Morty, when officers arrived here at the Pelosi home, exactly a week ago today, they initially didn't have any idea exactly what was going on. They knew they had a high priority call on their hand. What was unclear. What was happening inside the property, just behind me.
VOICE: This morning, Paul Pelosi is home. Back at the house that became a crime scene, a week ago today. NBC News learning, new details about the moments police arrived. Sources familiar with what unfolded in the Pelosi residence, now revealing when officers responded to the high priority call, they were seemingly unaware, they had been called to the speaker of the House. After a knock and announce, the front terror was opened by Mr. Pelosi. The 82-year-old did not immediately declare an emergency or try to leave his home. But instead, walking several feet back into the foyer, told the assailant. And away from police. It's unclear if the 82-year-old was already injured. Or what his mental state was, say sources. According to the court documents, when the officer asked what was going on, defendant smiled and said, everything was good. But instantaneously, a struggle ensued, as police clearly saw David DePape, strike Paul Pelosi in the head with a hammer, after tackling the suspect.
GLENN: Stop. Why was that pulled? NBC just said, because it didn't live up to their high standards of reporting.
Really? What was wrong with it?
Well, he just got that whole part of the story wrong.
STU: They didn't even say that. They didn't even say.
GLENN: No, no, no. But that's what they're alluding to.
STU: I don't even know if that's it. I think what they're saying maybe is the source they got, they don't deem reliable.
GLENN: Uh-huh.
STU: They don't know if the information is correct. But they're not saying it's wrong. They're not saying that.
GLENN: So -- I -- I think this is just another Hunter Biden laptop thing. This is screwing with the election, again. First of all, we don't know, but we do know officers said in the affidavit, someone opened up the door for them.
Okay? So we know that. And I have said to you, last week, who is the someone that opened the door? Was there a third party there?
That's how it was first reported that there's somebody else that opened the door. And that didn't make sense.
And then, wait a minute. Who opened the door then?
Well, we find out from this report, that Paul Pelosi opened the door. Now, if you're in trouble, you stay with the police. Or you say, this man has entered my home. Instead, he opened the door, and then went back to the guy. And he was holding a hammer. And that's when Paul Pelosi grabbed the hammer and there was a struggle for it.
Now, this doesn't make any sense at all. Something else that doesn't make any sense. Now, this could just be the San Francisco police are so bad, but they had no idea that that house was for the Speaker of the House. That is absolutely impossible, unless the -- the people you know at dispatch, didn't tell them. But I'll bet you, it goes up on their screen. There's no way, that house, you type in that address, at the police. And it doesn't come up with some sort of red font, that says, speaker of the House.
There's no way. No way.
STU: They even kind of tried to do the work of coming up with an excuse of some of this in the report. They said, well, you know we don't know what his mental state was at the time. We don't know if he was already injured.
If he got knocked on the head, by a hammer, a few times. Who knows how he's acting. They're trying to come up with an excuse in the report. Even that, wasn't enough for NBC News.
GLENN: So here's another part of the story.
The man accused of breaking into House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's house and attacking her husband with a hammer, could be deported from the US after he is released from custody. US immigration and customs enforcement, ICE, lodged an immigration detainer on the 42-year-old Canadian national, the DHS told NBC in a statement.
Now, hang on just a second. Wait a minute. Wait a minute.
He's being deported. And is it after he serves time, or after he is released from custody.
Now, those might mean the same thing. But are the police going to release him, like they're releasing everyone else. Well, you just come on back. Just come on back. Just call us. And we'll tell you when to be in court.
Is that -- is that what is happening this time?
And how come he's being deported without murdering somebody, and it doesn't seem like you can get anyone else, to get up on ICE's radar?
Now, there's a story from the New York Times. How Republicans fed misinformation loop, about the Pelosi attack. The New York Times.
I am mentioned in this. Within hours of the brutal attack last month, Paul Pelosi, the husband of the speaker of the House, activist and media outlets on the right, began circulating groundless claims, nearly all of them sinister and many homophobic, casting doubt on what had happened.
Okay.
Wait a minute. I'm in this story. They say that I was casting doubt on this. Really?
Because I was asking logical questions.
Who opened the door?
Who?
Some Republican officials quickly joined in, rushing to suggest the bludgeoning of the speaker's husband by a suspect, obsessed with right-wing conspiracy theories, was something else altogether, dismissing it as an inside job. A lover's quarrel. Or worse. What's worse?
The misinformation came from all levels of Republican politics. US senator said this. A Republican Congressman said this.
Donald Trump said, blah, blah, blah. The flood of falsehoods is showed -- is showed how engrained misinformation has become inside the G.O.P. Where the reflexive response of the rank and file, even a few prominent figures, to anything that might cast a negative light on the right, is to deflect it with more fictional claims, creating a vicious cycle, that muddies facts, shifts blame, and minimizes violence.
First of all, my first response was, if this comes from the left or the right, it must be condemned and they must be punished. So there is no fictional story there. My first response was that, and pray for Paul Pelosi.
So they go on to say, that we have so many falsehoods, and it's engrained in us. May I just ask the New York Times. How many of these stories did you publish?
Did you publish and lead the charge on Russian collusion? Did you publish the neo-Nazis are fine people lies? Did you publish and stand by Jussie Smollett? How about the Bubba Wallace garage pull, or the Covington kids, or the governor Whitmer kidnapping plot, or the Kavanaugh rape, or the Trump pee tape? I remember reading all of these. All of these sometimes for months in your newspaper.
Or the COVID lab leak is just a conspiracy theory, or the border agents that were on horses that were whipping migrants, or Trump saved nuclear secrets at Mar-a-Lago, the Steele dossier? Did you print the Russian bounties on the US soldiers in Afghanistan, or that Trump said drinking bleach would fight covid? Or the Muslim travel ban, or Hunter Biden's laptop was just disinformation from Russia?
Did you print any of these? Liberals, did you believe any of these?
How about Andrew Cuomo was the best at COVID leadership? Or Trump build cages for migrants kids? Or Trump overfed koi fish in Japan? Build Back Better will pay for itself, the Trump tax cuts benefited only the rich, cloth masks prevent COVID, if you get -- if you get vaccinated, you won't catch COVID and you won't spread it to others? How about the SUV-killed parade marchers, not the guy behind the wheel, but the SUV? Trump used tear gas to clear a crowd for a Bible photo, the "don't say gay" was actually in a bill?
How about the Putin price hike? Did you guys print that? Or ivermectin is horse dewormer and not for humans? Or the mostly peaceful protests of BLM? Or I love this one -- Trump overpowered Secret Service for the wheel of the beast? Or Officer Sicknick was murdered by protesters? January 6 was a well-planned insurrection, or BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player? And now we have our democracy is under threat.
My gosh. You're right. This disinformation thing is really coming from the right.
STU: It's a really amazing list.
GLENN: It's an amazing list.
STU: When you go through it like that. And this particular case too was really frustrating about this.
Because even when you read the New York Times story that mentioned you, with no evidence that you did any of the things, just a line that said you did them without explaining what you did, or how you did it wrong.
But even in their story, in their telling of it, the things that they're saying is misinformation, like, for example, the guy was seen in his underwear when he was found, comes from a mainstream media source. It was from a Fox affiliate.
GLENN: Yes. Yes.
STU: In the area.
And then you had the bigger one, which this NBC News -- the thing that we did from The Today Show. You know they're -- they're saying, well, look at these conspiracies, Republicans are spreading. Well, this information came from mainstream sources. The Today Show thing we played at the beginning of the show, is not a flippant off the top of their head comment. There are graphics for the quotes, for each one of the things he's saying.
GLENN: All of these things had to go through an executive producer. Had to go through edit. Had to go through art. All of it. All of it. So it's not like something that was said off the cuff.
STU: And that's the thing. A local Fox affiliate. Okay. They say something, detract it an hour later. Maybe you can say that just a mistake, bad source or whatever. This was a full-fledged produced, NBC report that aired on the Today Show, that went through the not right-wing source called NBC News. And all of the layers of crap, you have to do to get something on the air, on that channel. This was something they were sure of, until they were told, they shouldn't be sure of it.
GLENN: I -- are you -- are you bringing up a new conspiracy theory.
STU: I guess so.