RADIO

Will the Supreme Court end Biden’s border policy DISASTER?

Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt isn’t giving up when it comes to securing America’s southern border. He details to Glenn recent arguments made before the U.S. Supreme Court about why a Trump-era policy — ‘Remain in Mexico’ — could be the key to avoid ‘DISASTER’ at the border…a disaster that's already brewing thanks to the Biden administration’s decision to end Title 42. And this is an issue that affects EVERY American, Schmitt explains. Because when it comes to the crime, lawlessness, and drugs associated with our current border crisis, ‘Every state becomes a border state.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program. So glad that you have tuned in today. We have Eric Schmidt. He is the Missouri attorney general. He's also a candidate for the U.S. Senate.

And he was -- he was one of the guys, along with Texas, that is asking the Supreme Court for a reinstatement of the remain in Mexico policy. Because this -- the Biden policy is killing us.

Killing us. Welcome to the program, Eric. How are you, sir?

ERIC: Great to be back with you, Glenn. I'm doing great.

GLENN: Good. How is your campaign going for Senate, by the way?

ERIC: It's good. I think people are responding. They want a fighter right now, to shake up Washington. You know, coming from Missouri. That's certainly been my record as attorney general. We need reinforcements to save America. I know you talk about it every day. And that's my mission. So things are going well.

GLENN: So as the attorney general of Missouri, you are filing this motion with the Supreme Court. They accepted it. You argued in front of them yesterday. Explain what you're arguing for. Is this the same thing as the title -- what is it? I want to say Title IX. Or 42? Is it the same thing?

ERIC: It's not. So I'll take a step back here. So last year, Missouri and Texas challenged Biden trying to cancel. We came into office on day one, he reflexively tried to undo all of President Trump's successes, including the border security we had. And so there were a couple of pieces in place. Including, by the way, finishing this border wall. We have a lawsuit on that as well. But on remaining in Mexico, President Trump came in and said, look, we're not going to do this catch and release business, because people never show up for their court date, right? So Mexico will be the waiting room while you wait for your asylum hearing. Okay?

Very effective. And, by the way, it sent a signal to the cartels, that their business model will be disrupted. Because right now, all they really need to do is get people across the border. So remain in Mexico is a big part of that.

So we filed last year. We actually got a restraining order, and we got an injunction.

All the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said, the injunction will remain. Now, we've been fighting with the Biden administration, every month. To try to get them to re-implement. Reinstate it. It's been a challenge.

But the Supreme Court heard it again, the argument on the merits. Now, previously they said, we were likely to prevail on the merits. So we were hopeful. But we'll see. So that's a battle on the remain in Mexico.

GLENN: Okay. So hang on a second. Because all the reporting that is coming out, is saying that it looks like, they will not uphold the remain in Mexico.

ERIC: Well, we'll find out. It's hard to -- you know, basing on the justice's question, it's kind of a tricky game. So we don't know, right? That's what kind of hangs in the balance. So far, we've been successful, in kind of pushing them to not completely abandon it. Right?

So we were able to win before. But yesterday was a new ball game. Title 42 is different. Title 42 accounts for about 50 percent of all the expulsions. Okay. President Trump created this and said, look. We don't know where these people are coming from.

They -- they might have. And probably do have communicable diseases. Therefore, you can turn them back, based on that public health rationale. That's title two, okay?

That remained in place, and still continued, even though it's a porous border. About 50 percent of expulsions. If that goes away, Glenn. The estimates are, of 18,000 people a day, coming illegally, that we know of.

It would be a -- right now, we've seen waves and waves of illegal immigration. It would be an absolute tsunami, if that happens. Because we're entering a busy season anyway. There's no good time to do it. This is certainly a terrible time to do it. Biden knows it. Wants to do it anyway. And we would see, you know, Lieutenant Governor Patrick of Texas.

I'll give him credit for citing the statistic. If you extrapolate, you get to remain in Mexico. You get rid of Title 42. You don't have the border wall. You extrapolate that over his 40 years. That could be 40 million people coming over here illegally. That's the state of Texas.

That's five Missouris, okay? They're fundamentally trying to change this country, through their illegal immigration policy.

So earlier this week, Glenn, we obtained a temporary restraining order, preventing them from ending Title 42. But we'll be back in court on May 13th. So this is the fight goes on.

But the remain in Mexico and Title 42 are two big pieces of the Trump-era policies, that we were working, that Biden wants to dismantle.

GLENN: How is this affecting -- I know how it's affecting Texas. It is -- I mean, it is overwhelming Texas.

Especially any of these border towns. They're just -- you know, people are just being dumped off. And there are soon, there will be in many of these towns, more illegals, than there are citizens.

And, you know, what do you do about it? So how -- how is this -- how is this affecting Missouri and the rest of the country?

ERIC: Every state is a border state, Glenn. Because I've been to every state twice.

The problems with the criminal activity. The fentanyl, the drugs, the human trafficking. It doesn't just stop in El Paso. It doesn't just stop in McAllen.

It ends up in Columbia, Missouri. In Joplin, Missouri. In Columbus, Ohio. In Denver, Colorado.

Every state is a border state, when you have this crisis that we see at the border. And so we've taken on human trafficking. We see fentanyl now, killing people in every community, across this country. Overdose deaths now account for -- it's the highest cause of death now for 18 to 45-year-olds. And it is flooding across the border. A law enforcement agent told me, last time I was down there, Glenn. That the economic value for the human smuggling alone is $100 million a week.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

ERIC: They're running the show. And this administration is willingly doing it. And my contention is, that this is on purpose. They know a reckoning is coming in November. They want to pack the court. They want to add states to the union. They want to federalize our elections. They want to fundamentally change this country forever, and what they're doing at the border now is all part and parcel of that. And so we've got to do everything we can, to stop it. But it's very obvious what they're doing. Elizabeth Warren just this past weekend, said, well, now that they're over here. We ought to grant amnesty. So they're saying the quiet part out loud, so it's just a mess, a disaster.

GLENN: All right. So the Supreme Court. Are they going to come out with this decision, earlier in the summer, do you think?

ERIC: No. It will come down with the rest of their decisions here in a couple of months, is -- is likely when this will come down.

GLENN: Well, if Title 42 goes down, I mean, that's almost too late then, isn't it?

ERIC: Title 42 -- Title 42 is a big one. And, again -- here's the level of lawlessness, Glenn. I don't think people appreciate sometimes.

They were talking about ending Title 42 in mid-May. There were reports then, that he was just instructing. They were -- they were instructing border patrol agents, just to stop enforcing Title 42 altogether, even in mid-May.

Which is why we went in this week and said, hey, we need a temporary restraining order from doing that, before our hearing in mid-May. So again, they're playing for keeps. They have their peddle to the metal.

But it will be up to states like Missouri and Texas to push back. We're doing it, and we're going to do everything we can, to save this republic.

STU: Thank you very much, Eric. I appreciate it. Eric Schmidt. He is the Missouri attorney general that joined with the Attorney General of Texas, to try to get our borders under control. Also, running for U.S. Senate, you can find him at SchmidtforSenate.com.

Thank you so much, Eric. I appreciate it.

ERIC: Take care, Glenn.

GLENN: You bet.

RADIO

The Glenn Beck Program Honors Charlie Kirk

Join Glenn as he goes live to honor the memory of Charlie Kirk. A time of prayer, grieving, and remembrance for a husband, father, and patriot.

RADIO

Glenn joins Megyn Kelly live to discuss Charlie Kirk shooting

Covering the breaking news of Charlie Kirk at shot at Turning Point USA event.

RADIO

Please pray for my friend Charlie.

Please pray for Charlie Kirk.

Please pray for our Republic.

RADIO

Gen Z's surprising support for Trump and socialist policies revealed in new poll

A shocking number of young Americans support BOTH President Trump and democratic socialism, a new poll has found, and they're willing to make major changes to the American system to get what they feel they deserve. Justin Haskins, who conducted the poll with Rasmussen, joins Glenn Beck to break down the unexpected findings…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins. He's the president of our republic. StoppingSocialism.com. He's editor-in-chief. And also the coauthor of several books, with me. Welcome to the program, Justin.

How are you?

JUSTIN: I'm doing well, Glenn. How are you?

STU: Well, I was well, until you contacted me on vacation, and sent me this disturbing poll.

I am in bed at night.

And I'm reading this. I'm like, oh, dear.

What? My wife is like, I told you to not check this email. I'm like, I didn't know Justin was going to write to me.

Justin, tell me, first of all, before we get into it, how secure is the sample size on this poll?

JUSTIN: It's a very good sample size. 1200 people nationally.

Only 18 to 39-year-olds. And we did that deliberately, so that we could get a sample size large enough so we could pull out valid responses, just from younger people.

So the whole purpose of this poll was to find out what younger people, 18 to 39 think, voters only. And people who say that they're likely to vote. So we're not talking about just people out in the public. We're not talking about registered voters.

We're talking about people who are registered to vote. And say they're likely to vote.

GLENN: So let's go over some of the things that you have already released to the press.

And that is, in the survey, 18 to 39-year-olds, likely voters.

The Trump approval rating is a lot higher than you thought it would be. Right?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. Forty-eight percent positive approval rating of Donald Trump, which for young people, is very high.

So that's -- that's the good news.

That's the only good news we're going to talk about.

GLENN: We might have to come back to that first question several times.

Do you believe the United States is a fundamentally good, evil, or morally mixed country?

JUSTIN: Yep. This one is not too bad.

It's not great. But fundamentally good was 28 percent.

Which is low. But mixed was 50 percent.

And fundamentally evil was 17 percent.

And I think mixed at 50 percent is not an unreasonable, crazy response.

I -- I can see why all sorts of people might choose that.

So I don't think there's anything terrible here. It depends on what you mean by mixed. Fundamentally good at 28 percent. It's a little low. Fundamentally evil at 17 percent, it's a little disturbing. But it's not -- it's not insane. The insane stuff comes a little bit later.

GLENN: Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Major industries talk about the crazy stuff coming later, here it is.

Major industries like health care, energy, and big tech should be nationalized and give more control and equity to the people.

JUSTIN: Yeah. This was -- this was -- this one floored me. If I look at strongly agree. Somewhat agree for that statement you just read. It's over 70 percent of young people, including -- including the vast majority of Republicans. Young Republicans. And people who identify as conservatives.

It was pretty similar, in fact, how young people responded compared to liberals and independents.

And Democrats.

They all pretty much agreed that, yes. The government. The federal government should be nationalizing whole industries to make things more equitable for people.

GLENN: As the guy who is the chief -- editor-in-chief of stopping socialism. What's the problem with nationalizing energy, and health care?

JUSTIN: Well --

GLENN: What happens, typically.

JUSTIN: Well, usually, there's blood in the streets, when you do too much of that.

You know, socialism, communism have been spectacularly horrible, throughout the course of human history. Across every society, culture, religion.

It doesn't matter when or what kind of technological advancements you have. The more you collect vies a society. The more authoritarian that society gets. The less you have individual freedom. And the worst the economy usually is for regular people. So it's been a catastrophe across-the-board. Everyone listening to this audience, probably knows that.

And so the idea that you would have three-quarters of young voters. So remember, these people will be the primary voters in ten to 20 years.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: Saying, yeah. We should be nationalizing whole industries. Whole industries, is so disturbing.

And I don't think that conservatives are -- understand how deeply rooted some of these ideas are with younger people.

GLENN: No. No.

And I will tell you, I think some conservatives are walking a very dangerous line. And, you know, coming up with a little mix of everything.

And -- and I think we have to be very careful on -- on what is being said. And who are WHO our friends and allies are.

By the way, that number again is 39 percent strongly agree.

37 percent somewhat agree.

Somewhat disagree, 12 percent. Strongly disagree, 5 percent.

That is disastrous. Now, try this one on. These are the ones that have been -- we have new ones.

These are just a few of the ones that were released late last week. The next presidential election is in 2028. Would you like to see a democratic socialist candidate win the 2028 presidential election?

JUSTIN: Yep, 53 percent said yes.

Fifty-three percent of all voters said yes. And the most shocking thing, was that 35 percent of those who we poll, who said they voted for Donald Trump, in 2024, said that that they want to see a socialist win in 2028. And so about a third of Republicans, 35 percent of Trump voters, 43 percent of people who call themselves conservatives, so even on the right, among younger people. There is a large group that want a socialist president, in 2028.

GLENN: And the reason -- the reason is, it -- it tied into the next few questions. Okay.

So here's question five. Among the following options, which best describes your biggest reason, you would like to see a democratic socialist candidate. Thirty-one percent said housing costs are too high. Twelve percent, taxes are too low for corporations. Eleven percent, taxes are too low for wealthy have I seen.

Eight percent want single payer health care systems. Seventeen say the economy unfairly benefits older, wealthier Americans.

Fifteen percent say the economy unfairly benefits larger corporations. 5 percent, some other reason.

And 2 percent, unsure. Now, let's get into the new polls that were breaking today.

Question six.

How would you describe your current financial situation?

JUSTIN: Yeah. Only 24 percent said that they're doing well. Thirty-four -- 38 percent said getting by. Struggling 29 percent. Seven percent said in crisis. So if you add up just getting by, struggling, and in crisis, that's 74 percent said that they're just barely getting by, at best.

And I think that explains a lot of the other negative responses we've seen so far.

GLENN: That's not good.

JUSTIN: In this poll. And the ones that are going to come pretty soon here.

GLENN: Seven. Which best describes your personal life situation?

You are thriving, you're doing well with a few ups and downs. You feel stuck and uncertain. You feel lonely, disconnected, or emotionally drained. You're in a crisis and feel most negative about your personal life.

JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. About a third said that they feel stuck or uncertain. Lonely. Or that they're in a crisis.

That's a third of young people. Say that.

I mean, that's -- that's not great. Only 19 percent said thriving.

46 percent said, they have ups and downs. Which I think is not. Too shocking.

But the idea that there's a third of American voters out there, who feel like, they can't buy a home. And they feel like they are lonely. And that they're in crisis. And that life is not just going well at all for them.

Again, I think that's -- that's driving a lot of the support for socialism. When you have 53 percent of these people saying, yeah. I want a socialist president in 2028.

GLENN: So socialism is not the answer. It is the symptom. It is the symptom of what people are feeling right now.

And they -- they don't know any other -- they don't -- nobody is presenting them with anything other than, you know, Republican/Democrat bullcrap. And socialists are coming at it from a completely nigh angle. Or so the youth think it's the oldest and most failed system of all time.

But they're seeing this as a solution that is different than what the party -- the Republican/Democrats are offering. Even though the Democrats are offering the socialism thing.

Number eight, do you think the American economy is unfair to young people?

Sixty-two percent say yes.

JUSTIN: Yeah, and 27 percent said no.
And I think that this really gets at the heart of what the issue is here.

When you look at the reasons. When you look at the detailed things of the poll.

What -- to try to find out if there's an association between some kind of demographic or response question about people's lives and their support for socialism, to see if there's a correlation there between something that is happening. And whether someone is a socialist or not.

One of the top correlations, connections, is, if people think the economy is unfair.

And if they're having trouble buying a home. Or they don't think they can buy a home. Or that's one of their reasons for supporting socialism.

So, in other words, there's this fairness issue. And it's not even about inequality.

It's not about, well, they have too much -- well, if they feel like the -- to use a Trump term. Rigged.

And throughout the data. That's what we see over and over and over again. Is lots of people say, the economy is rigged. For older people. For wealthier people, for corporations. It's rigged. And if they say, yeah. I think it's rigged, you know, then they're more likely to say, yeah. I want a socialist.

And I also think the same group has a relatively high approval rating of Donald Trump.

It's because the reason that a lot of young people like Trump in the poll, is that he's not part of the establishment.

And I think -- I don't think they -- I think a lot of young people who voted for Trump and who liked Trump, they didn't do it, because they liked free market, pro-liberty policies. And that's not a good thing.

But I don't think that's why they did it. I think a lot of them voted for Trump and supported him, because he's not the establishment. And that's what they don't like. They want to blow the establishment up.

JUSTIN: So my -- Justin, my sample size is my two young adults. My two children.

And they're like, talking to me, and saying, Dad. I will never be able to own a home, looking at the prices, looking at interest rates. They're like, I can't even afford to pay rent at an apartment. And they don't know what to do.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JASON: And so they're looking at -- on, like, TikTok. And they're like, who is this Mamdani guy? This sounds interesting. They bring this to me. They grew up listening to me indoctrinating them their entire lives. They're looking at other voices like on TikTok. Are we just not being loud enough?

GLENN: No. We're not -- we're not connecting with them. We're not -- I feel like they don't feel they're being heard.

And we are speaking to them in red, white and be blue.

And that means nothing. The Statue of Liberty means nothing to them. Ellis Island means nothing to them. The flag means nothing to them.

It's all partisan politics.

They're all symbols of really, the two parties.

You know, and an America, they don't relate to at all.

I think that's -- that's our biggest problem, and not being able to break through. To your point, question nine. How confident are you that you will own a home at some point, in the next ten years?

29 percent say, they already own a home. Which I found interesting. That's -- I think a pretty high number for somebody who is 18 to 34 years old.

JUSTIN: Thirty-nine.

GLENN: Thirty-nine.

JUSTIN: Yeah.

GLENN: There's a lot of 18 to 30. That I didn't own home when I was, you know, 30. Just got a home when I was 30. But go ahead. Go ahead with the rest of that poll.

JUSTIN: Yeah. So then 21 percent said discouraged, but somewhat hopeful. 12 percent said, not confident. 10 percent said, you are convinced you will never own a home. 3 percent not sure.

So if you add up the negative responses, it's around 43 percent that gave that response.

GLENN: Right. But, again, 29 percent, you already own a home. And 25 percent you are confident you will own a home, is still good. It just -- these -- these other numbers, have, you know, discouraged, but hopefully you will own a home. Who is discouraging that? And how is that being discouraged?

You know, only 12 -- let's see 12. Twenty-two. 25 percent are not sure they will ever own a home. That's too high of a number.

But I -- I don't think that's completely dismal. Now, a completely dismal answer, to the question, would you support a law that would confiscate America's excess wealth?

Including things like second homes. Luxury cars, and private boats, in order to help young people buy a home for the first time?

Are you for or against that? We'll give you that number here in just a second.

GLENN: There are some disturbing results, that get very disturbing, going from here on.

We've got two of these today, and then more tomorrow.

We'll spend more time with you tomorrow, Justin.

But would you support a law that would confiscate American's excess wealth, including things like second home, luxury cars, and private boats in order to help young people buy a home for the first time? Get the results.

JUSTIN: Yeah, 25 percent strongly support that, 30 percent somewhat support it, 55 percent in total for support. Only 38 percent strongly or somewhat oppose, with just 20 percent saying strongly oppose. So the vast majority now is -- is supporting this Communistic policy to confiscate people's wealth in order to help people. Younger people buy homes, which is in line with that question, we talked about earlier. Where it said, you know, three-quarters of these respondents wanted to nationalize whole industries to make things fairer. So it's all about -- it's all about this sense of unfairness that exists.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

JUSTIN: And they feel like. Young people feel like the system is rigged. They feel like neither party is on their side, and they want to blow the whole thing up, by just taking wealth away from people, nationalizing whole industries, and redistributing it all.

And guess what, that's basically the democratic socialist platform. So it's not a surprise that that's -- that's becoming increasingly more popular with these young people.

And I don't think that free market, pro-liberty people are dealing with -- with this.

GLENN: No.

JUSTIN: In a real way.

In fact, I think a lot of us have believed recently that the wind is at our backs, and we're actually winning more and more young people over.
And that isn't what's happening according to the poll results.

GLENN: It explains why the Democrats have not moved their position off of the socialism stuff.

Doesn't it?

We keep saying, why? It's not working with anybody.

It is working. It is working with people under 39.

18 to 39-year-olds are hearing this message, and are embracing this message.