RADIOJanuary 12, 2023

World Economic Forum's 'smart cities’ will limit your FOOD?

American farmers are becoming an endangered species, thanks to world elites like Bill Gates and investment firms like BlackRock buying up vast amounts of land and property. The price of farmland is SKYROCKETING, and ordinary Americans can’t keep up. But it gets even worse. In this clip, Glenn details America’s farmland crisis and ALSO the World Economic Forum’s next, big goal: ‘Smart Cities’ by 2030 that will not only limit your purchases, but your FOOD INTAKE as well…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Last night, I talked about the war on land. On fuel. All of it. Food.

What is happening with our food, is outrageous. I'm going to give you some things here. That you will not believe. In -- in -- in about eight minutes, you will say, no way that's true.

You're going to have to look it up. And I'll give you the address and everything else.

Okay?

Right now, 40 percent of farmland in America, 40, is owned we Americans over 65. Our farmers are dying out.

So farmland, 40 percent of it, is going to go up for sale, soon. Okay?

And the way everything is structured, the farmer's families usually can't afford to keep the farm, when mom and dad die. So that means 370 million acres are going to come up. Of farmland. Good, American farmland, going to come up for sale, soon.

Now, the prices of farmland is skyrocketing for some reason.

I mean, who wants farmland? You know, the best and fastest way to become a millionaire, as a farmer, is start with 2 million.

Okay? You're guaranteed to have a million dollars, probably by the end of the year. It's a losing prospect.

It is hard work. Hard work. And you need good communities around you.

So why is farmland prices going up?

Well, a couple of reasons. COVID, people are like, oh, I just want to be someplace other than California. And so then they buy -- we'll raise chickens. And we'll have eggs. And maybe we'll have a goat. And a first winter. And the first harvest. They're like.

And they run back someplace in the city.

A few months ago, a farm in Iowa, sold for $25,000. Per acre. To say that land prices are skyrocketing is an understatement. So who is buying all of the farmland?

Well, BlackRock. Buying uproared -- record -- shattering amounts of homes. For farms, it's people like Bill Gates.

Now, I don't know about you. But Bill Gates, buying up 300,000 acres, spread out -- remember, 40 percent of the farmlands. 40 percent owned by 60 -- 65 and up.

40 percent -- how many acres did I say that was?

370 million. 40 percent, 370. How many acres does Bill Gates have in you?

He's approaching 300 million acres. So that's kind of disturbing. One guy, owning another 40 percent of our farmland, if these numbers are right?

That's terrifying. Especially a guy who believes in, you know what, well, we shouldn't have cattle. We shouldn't have milk. And, you know, I think genetically, fix these animals. Because I am God!

STU: And also, more disturbingly, this is the guy who approved Clippy.

GLENN: Yes.

STU: The little paper clip, that would give you recommendations on what to do with Microsoft Office.

GLENN: So I totally support Bill Gates, and his little farmer expedition. He's going to be a good farmer.

STU: You think he's done a lot of farming? You think bill has been in the fields, with a hoe?

GLENN: Oh, sure. Three hundred -- hmm. 37.6 million acres of US farm and ranch land, now held under foreign ownership. 37.6 million acres.

They've doubled down recently, buying land in Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado. Forty percent growth rate in just 2020.

One Chinese government link group bought farmland near Grand Forks Air Force base in North Dakota. No problem there. No problem.

No, really, seriously.

Former member of the Chinese Communist Red Army bought land near Laughlin Air Force Base here in Texas. The windmill project that he's doing, gives the Chinese yet another dangerous location next to a sensitive military base.

Buyers from Communist China bought 6.1 billion acres of farmland here in the US. Hmm.

By farm, that's more than any other foreign buyer. But it's just the Chinese, you know, communist government, that's doing it. What could possibly go wrong?

By the way, an update. I said this last night. Ron DeSantis, is the only guy that would do this. He needs to ban China, from buying farmland.

And guess what he did yesterday. Yeah. He's banning China from buying farmland. Where are you, Texas?

Where are you?

Okay. So you're seeing that our farmland is being put into the hands of either our enemies. Like Bill Gates.

Or the Chinese. So what are you going to do?

Bill Gates, 300 million acres.

STU: Thousand, isn't it? A thousand acres? You said 300 million.

GLENN: 300 million? Let me look at it. 300,000? Okay. So it's a lot better.

STU: It's still a lot of acres.

GLENN: Yes. But much better than 300 million. 300,000 acres. So he's got all this farmland. You know, where he's going. He's fully with the World Economic Forum, okay?

So the World Economic Forum. What do they want to do?

Well, they want to control the land. They want to control the food. They want to control the energy. They want to control the money. Well, if you do all of those things, you control you.

Now, I'm going to take you to something, to the World Economic Forum, their own website. They have a section on smart cities. Oh. This is a really smart city.

Like, I don't know. Like Chicago, very smart.

So the smart cities are the way to get all of our problems under control.

Because you're going to -- their plan is to force everybody into cities.

And leave the land alone.

Remember, they have to, by 2030, and Biden has already done this. He's going to preserve 30 percent of all land in America. No humans will be on it.

By 2050, it's 50 percent of all land. So where do the people go?

The people all have to go into cities. But they will be smart cities. Now, I want you to go to the World Economic Forum's website. And I want you to look this up for yourself. Because you will not believe what I'm about to tell you.

But it's there currently, in black and white.

So you decide, who is the conspiracy theorist, and who is actually lying to you.

Back in 60 seconds. Mike wrote about his experience with Relief Factor.

He says, my body is all beat up from working so long. I've dealt with inflammation for years.

One day, I was talking to a friend of mine, how I needed some sort of relief. And he said, have you heard about Relief Factor? No kidding, in four days, it started working for me.

I am thrilled. Thanks for writing in. Thanks for letting us know.

Relief Factor is great. Because it doesn't whack you out. It's not a drug. It's all natural. Four key ingredients that will fight inflammation, which is the source of most of the pain in our body and the source of most of our disease as well.

We have a real problem with inflammation.

Three-week Quick Start. 19.95. It's a trial pack. And hundreds of thousands of people have ordered Relief Factor.

And about 70 percent of them go on to order more. So go to ReliefFactor.com.

Call 800-4-Relief. 800-4-Relief. Relief Factor. Feel the difference. Ten-second station ID.
(music)
You're going to love this. You're going to love this. You go to the World Economic Forum, you look at their smart cities, and you're going to see what is planned for you. Now, they have all kinds of partners all over the world.

One of them is the Arup Group. A-R-U-P. Arup Group. They have their own section on the WEF website. Okay?

They're a progressive group that got together, in Britain, right after World War II, and they were like, hey, we can do a lot of things.

You know, these Fabian socialists, they have a lot of great ideas. Why don't we start building things and building a community of tomorrow?

So very progressive minded, and they want to be a source and a force for peace and social betterment, which I look for in a construction company, don't you?

I mean, I'm like, yeah, but how -- I mean, how is it with earthquakes and stuff?

Social betterment? Did we say social betterment?

STU: Same reason we go to NASA.

GLENN: Exactly right.

So -- well, you go to NASA, to learn about the Muslim.

STU: And how much they know about math.

GLENN: Right. So from the World Economic Forum, let's put page 40 up. There it is.

Now, I love this. Now, this is a whole section on, look, we've got some pretty big goals to hit. And we've got to hit them. So how do we build these smart cities? And what do we need people to do by 2030?

Now, they have some pretty aggressive goals, and some of them are up there. And, I mean, if you're watching Blaze TV, you'll see them up from the website, itself.

But let me -- let me give it to you, just in case you're not watching. Because gosh darn it, these -- these stats are a little sticky.

So food -- food, they need to reduce the emissions of food. By 2030.

So the -- their target -- their target by 2030, is you will only have 16 kilograms of meat. Per year.

Now, their aggressive target for 2030, is that you have 0 kilograms of meat. I'm telling you, what they're doing to the farmers and the ranchers, what these giant -- the four big food processors are doing.

They're driving them out of business. So you can't have any local ranchers growing meat. Because they're getting rid of meat. Listen to Klaus Schwab who says, by 2030, meat will be for the rich and very wealthy for occasions only.

You with that?

Again, on their own website. Sixteen kilograms. That's all you can have of meat. Right now, the dairy consumption. Milk, or derivative equivalent. So cheeses and everything else. They're hoping you will have 90 kilograms, if that. But their aggressive, ambitious target for 2030, is zero.

Now, remember, they need you to live like we lived in the pandemic, except without the nice stuff that you might have had, like cheese and milk and meat in the pandemic. You'll be required to have on me 2500 calories a day. Now, I don't know about you. But I don't know if I can live with 2500 calories. I really don't like the fact. You know, maybe it's because I've studied so much, about the Holocaust.

And, you know, when governments and institutions start regulating calories. Makes me think of the Holocaust a little bit. But maybe that's just me.

Now, when it comes to clothing, clothing is a problem.

Okay? We have too many clothes. For -- and I personally, I've watched television.

I don't think we have enough clothes, quite frankly. Lizzo comes to mind.

So their progressive target for 2030 is that people will only be allowed to have eight new clothing items per person, per year. But they really are shooting for three. So, comrade, you could have a new shirt, a new pair of pants. And maybe some socks.

Merry Christmas. We'll begin to go, oh, the socks for Christmas. Thank you.

So, you know, no big deal there. On private transportation, their goal is, now, I don't even know the number. They don't include this in there, how many vehicles per thousand people. What do you knowing, per thousand people? How many vehicles do we currently have, do you think?

STU: I mean --

GLENN: 500?

STU: Yeah. Some of them are kids. I don't know if you're thinking, it's going to be at least 500 of them.

GLENN: At least 500. They want to reduce that, by 2030, to 190 cars per 1,000 people.
And their ambitious target is zero cars per 1,000 people.

Oh, and, by the way, your 20-year car, the car that should last you 20 years. They want it to last you 50 years.

So we'll all be driving. Oh, my gosh. This started to sound like Cuba. Where the sun is out every day, and you can go to the beach whenever you want. And try to fashion a craft out of logs and a sail.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.