Most law enforcement officers agree: Gun control will hurt America

Get Glenn Live! On TheBlaze TV

On radio this morning Glenn shared some of the staggering results from a new survey released by PoliceOne, which shows law enforcement personnel in the United States overwhelmingly disagrees with the gun control measures being discussed in Washington D.C.

According to TheBlaze, PoliceOne is a law enforcement website with more than 1.5 million unique visitors per month and 400,000 registered members. Between March 4 and March 13, 2013, PoliceOne asked 15,000 verified active and retired law enforcement personnel more than 20 questions about how they believe stricter gun control will affect the community.

A full list of the survey questions and results can be found HERE, but below are a few of the standouts.


Photo Credit: PoliceOne


Photo Credit: PoliceOne


Photo Credit: PoliceOne


Photo Credit: PoliceOne

“The people who are dealing with this every day are telling you, please let the people have their guns,” Glenn said in reaction to the results. “This makes us and our community more safe. Everything you’re proposing in the White House will not work. It will make things worse. And, if you really want to fix the problem, maybe we should look at the families. How can we strengthen them?”

“But don’t worry,” he concluded. “These are only the people that we pay to protect us, that we pay to guard our families and our streets. Why would we ever listen to a survey from them?”

  • Anonymous

    Why am I not surprised that Beck and his minions have no understanding of science or statistics?
    That’s not a study. It’s a self-selected opinion poll. It has nothing to do with “most law enforcement officers”. It’s merely the ones that signed up on this site and chose to participate in the poll.
    It’s like thinking American Idol voting proves who the greatest singer of all time is. 
    LOL.

    • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

      Why am I not socked that knownothing can’t argue with the facts and then goes and make up crap.

      • Draxx

         Maybe he should change his name to “KnowNothing”…

        • Anonymous

          Good one!!!!

        • Anonymous

          Maybe one of you with a brain should figure out a substantive response to what I actually said.

          • Anonymous

            All I got out of your post was ignorance, and your lack of common sense ! Are liberals always the ones that constantly throw out twisted lies ! You need to check up on your facts or keep your mouth shut !

          • Anonymous

            Maybe if you grew a brain, you could actually come up with a substantive argument.

      • Anonymous

        LOL. Actually, I made a very cogent, substantive argument as to why it’s not a scientific study, and your reply was to copy my first sentence. Nice work, scholar. 

        • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

          No because you are ignoring facts there is a difference numb nuts.

          • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

            He doesn’t have any nuts, he’s a libtard.

          • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

            But yet the liberals a full of them.

        • Anonymous

          Hey genius. Nowhere does it state it’s a scientific study. It’s a survey of known law enforcement officers. You know, aka, a poll. You must be that stupid, to think your argument has any merit when you assumed Glenn called it a scientific study. You should change your name to NoWitsAtAll.

    • Anonymous

      Only the weak minded and fools believe that gun control are needed. Do you ignorant liberals really think that by taking our 2nd amendment rights will keep the sick, demented, and just plane heartless evil from getting a gum ? That is what is wrong with our country now ! A few people don’t like prayer so majority looses their right to pray, a few people think that getting rid of guns will end all violence so we will take them away from law abiding citizens . Wake up !!! You all are killing our country and our freedoms! I’m sure if someone came into your house with a gun and threatened your family you would be happy knowing you have no way to protect them. UGH ! You all are so insane!  You all lack common sense !!!! 

      • http://www.facebook.com/angela.h.brown.5 Angela Homer Brown

        The Gov’t didn’t like the fact that “the little people” were getting in their faces and petitioning for redress of grievances by protesting at functions where they were speaking so they took our 1st amendment right away from us and made a law that says we can’t assemble within a certain amt of area.  It is a First Amendment Right!  It is now Gone!  HR347.  You can be arrested for a felony.  And it is not just the President but ANYONE who is being protected by secret service.  So, Dont say that it CAN’T happen!  Don’t laugh it off people and say that we are a bunch of extremists who don’t know what we are talking about. 

    • greywolfrs

      So, you believe that 15,000 law enforcement and former law enforcement officers who choose to participate in this poll are not indicative of the law enforcement community in general? You are the one who has no clue about statictics. Dumb M F er.

    • Anonymous

      Apparently you did not grasp the fact that the poll was conducted by http://www.policeOne and not The Blaze.  It is often hard for someone with a modern “education” to actually have reading comprehension skills.  That is the reason reading comprehension is being taught in “remedial” classes in our universities today.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Marc-Dantonio/1315131952 Marc Dantonio

       Hey Knowitsome… I think YOU should read the article more carefully because its YOU that doesnt have a clue. The poll had nothing to do with Glenn Beck or The Blaze! He is just reporting it. The organization that conducted the survey is called PoliceOne and it was THEIR survey conducted in March 2013.
      So now that you know its not BECK I expect you to come up with a better comeback and do some demographic analysis on the PoliceOne website and its 1.5 million members… There you go.Now off into your little corner with you again…

      Your response though WAS typical of you libs. I always say this about Liberals, especially cherrypickers like you: I have never met a Liberal who isnt proudly impervious to FACTS…

      You may use the line… It is often true.

  • Draxx

    Gun Control in America will not only hurt us, but it will also hurt the rest of the world…  As the largest population of people that believe in Individual Freedom and Rights, we would lose the Ability To Protect Those Rights (and the world will follow, if they are not already there)!

    • Anonymous

      actually, the rest of the civilized world laughs at our obsession with guns and the ridiculous gun violence rates we have here compared to them.

      • Anonymous

         Strangely, you are ignoring fact. Are you a conservative?

      • Anonymous

        References, please.

      • Anonymous

         while the government on citizen violence rates in many of those countries is nothing to laugh about

      • http://www.facebook.com/franklin.johnson.92 Franklin Johnson

        Lets see some of this laughing world,  The British aren’t laughing,  or anyone else that have it..

        • http://www.facebook.com/angela.h.brown.5 Angela Homer Brown

          You are living in a world where the leftist media is not telling you the truth.  Brittish rightist and Autralian rightists all say that it is hell on earth to be without their firearms and their “rights”.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1298990430 Mark Hubbard

         they only laugh because the way the media covers it – one sided

      • Anonymous

        Then why don’t you take your commie views over to one of the “smarter” places in the world ? South Korea, China, Egypt !

      • Anonymous

        Actually, you’re communist lies hold no water and numerous people from these countries are telling us NOT to cave into the progressives, even if the laws are passed. Once we’re dissarmed, and the 2nd amendment has been gutted, the rest of our rights are soon to follow. Those countries citizens are envious of us.

  • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

    So in other words the liberals are ignoring facts to take more Constitutional rights away for control over us.

    • http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

      As per their plan.

    • Anonymous

      Conservatives wouldn’t know a fact if it was dressed up like a WMD in Iraq.

      • JohnWolf

         Are you refering to the materials trucked to Syria from Iraq?

        • Anonymous

          LOL. Are you the only one on the planet still claiming that Saddam had WMDs? 

          • greywolfrs

            Are you just another drone spouting the same left wing lies? Apparently so. Dunce.

          • mtman2

            If U’ve ever seen a spoiled early teenage girl that’s always been indulged, so actually believes she’s clever + can out smart the world[she only assumes takes her seriously], then U’ve seen the real girlyman[above] NO-WIT+SUCKS to be ME If he ever knew anything relevant or useful; he’d be doing it + not being useless!.

          • Anonymous

            Do you ever say anything of any consequence? You’re like a little girl.

          • greywolfrs

            Sounds like you speak from experience.

          • Anonymous
          • greywolfrs

            Nevermind it was Democraps who said first, in 1998. You morons always seem to forget that. You claim “everyone” knows Assad has chemical weapons, but refuse to see that Saddam had them also, as he used them on the Kurds and the Iranians in the Iran/Iraq war. You are one dumb M F er.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000330704874 Dion Cassidy

            He didn’t use WMD’s on his own people, right?  Poisonous gas delivered by missile or artillery shell is a WMD.  should change your name to knowitnot

          • Anonymous

            He used them years before. The ones that we gave him. He had none in 2003 when Bush started that war. Duh.

          • Bill Tyner

            You forgot about years of poison gas attacks on the Kurds didn’t you?

          • Anonymous

            No, I remember those because we gave him that poison gas. I was talking about the war started in 2003. The excuse was WMDs and none were found. Period.

          • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

            Hillary said there was, Nancy Pelosi said there was, in fact a whole line of liberals were calling for an invasion of Iraq long before Bush was even elected.

            “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.That is our bottom line.”President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998-Truth!This was a quote from President Clinton during a presentation at the Pentagon defending a decision to conduct military strikes against Iraq.

            “If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998-Truth!Bill Clinton went to the Pentagon on this occasion to be briefed by top military officials about Iraq and weapons of mass destruction.
            His remarks followed that briefing.

            “Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998-Truth!This is a quote from Albright during an appearance at Ohio State University by Albright, who was Secretary of State for Bill Clinton. 
            “He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998-Truth!This was at the same Ohio State University appearance as Madeline Albright. “We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.Constitution and Laws, to take necessary actions, (including, if appropriate,air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destructionprograms.”Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998-Truth!According to the U.S. Senate website, the text of this letter was signed by several Senators, both Democrat and Republican, including Senator John McCain and Joseph Lieberman.”Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998-Truth!The text of this statement by Nancy Pelosi is posted on her congressional website.”Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999-Truth!This was from an appearance Albright made in Chicago.
            She was addressing the embargo of Iraq that was in effect at the time and criticism that it may have prevented needed medical supplies from getting into the country.  Albright said, “There has never been an embargo against food and medicine. It’s just that Hussein has just not chosen to spend his money on that. Instead, he has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction, and palaces for his cronies.””There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programscontinue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001Truth!The only letter with this quote from December 5, 2001 that we could find did not include the participation of Senator Bob Graham, but it was signed nine other senators including Democrat Joe Lieberman.It urged President Bush to take quicker action against Iraq.”We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.”Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002-Truth!These were remarks from Senator Levin to a Senate committee on that date.”We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002-Truth!This and the quote below was part of prepared remarks for a speech in San Francisco to The Commonwealth Club.

            “Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002-Truth!”We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002-Truth!Part of a speech he gave at Johns Hopkins.”The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…”Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002-Truth!On the floor of the Senate during debate over the resolution that would authorize using force against Iraq.  He was urging caution about going to war and commented that even though there was confidence about the weapons in Iraq, there had not been the need to take military action for a number of years and he asked why there would be the need at that point.”I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force– if necessary– to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002-Truth!Senator Kerry’s comments were made to the Senate as part of the same debate over the resolution to use force against Saddam Hussein.”There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimatedthe progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002-Truth!Senator Rockefeller’s statements were a part of the debate over using force against Saddam Hussein.”He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy hischemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do” Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002-Truth!Senator Waxman’s contribution to the Senate debate over going to war.”In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biologicalweapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.  It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002-Truth!Senator Clinton acknowledged the threat of Saddam Hussein but said she did not feel that using force at that time was a good option.
            “Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime He presents aparticularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to hiscontinued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destructionSo the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ….”Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23.2003-Truth!In a speech to Georgetown University.

          • Bill Tyner

            Your accusation is empty and the factual evidence from war crimes trials at the Hague makes me think you are purveying propaganda.  I read reports from the Moscow Times and note that even they do not accuse the US of supplying chemical weapons.  At Hussein’s and “Chemical” Ali’s war crimes trials it never came up.  What did become known was that the ready to use agents he used came from about a dozen Middle Eastern, Asian and European countries.  Iran might have been the source of the cyanide based gas which makes that ongoing war between Iraq and Iran a mutual exchange of chemical agents.  Makes one think that Iraq traded oil for chemicals and got them easily when they wanted them.  He had no storage but got them quickly from others (not the US) and used them.  

          • Bill Tyner

            Correction: I meant to say “trial in Iraq” not “at the Hague”.  

          • Anonymous

            Just because they didn’t find them during the war, doesn’t mean he didn’t have them and moved them to his buddy in Syria before we invaded Iraq. You can bet that Assad has them and they probably came from Iraq.

          • Anonymous

            And just because there is science doesn’t mean that Unicorns don’t really exist. But I’ll believe it when I see one.

          • don

            you know tag talking to knownothing is like talking to a fart in a wind storm. he is all over the place an still knows only some

          • Anonymous

            We’ve known what Assad has and how much he has for years. No new shipments came in. You have no idea what you’re talking about, you’re just making stuff up as you go along.

          • Anonymous
          • Kitchener Head

            Nope, there are at least two of us

          • Anonymous

            You’re also missing out on the recent medical studies on soldiers who were in Iraq that have come back with symptoms of nerve gas inhalation, including neurological damage and the military is saying that while destroying some weapons depots in the Northern territories, they believe that nerve gas was released from buried containers.

            Keep saying what you want and ignoring evidence.  Unfortunately, that doesn’t help the disabled soldiers; just your misguided beliefs and cause.

          • Anonymous

            Still living up to your name. NoWitsAtAll.

          • Anonymous

            Brilliant reply. Wow, you’re clever. And filled with knowledge.

          • Anonymous

            Have you forgotten about the 500 tons of Iraqi yellow cake the US sold to Canada? Have you forgotten about the thousands of French missiles laced with sarin gas? Or are you just an ignorant liberal? (I know, I know…..that’s redundant.)

          • Anonymous

            Have you forgotten that yellow cake nonsense was BS? LOL.

          • Anthony A

             hey dope he had labs on 2 -747’s which before we invaded, they flew the planes to syria…u dopy liberals it was the clinton’s intelligent info that said he had wmd’s…2001 Bush was in office effectively for 8mos. because of all the liberal recounts in Fla. u azz-wipes!

          • Anonymous

            Hey Knowitnone. Have you ever seen the videos of all of the Kurds that Saddam gassed to death? Women and children and the elderly victims lining the streets where they died. I don’t know what YOU call “WMD’s”. Maybe it’s Willingly Manipulating Data or Willfully Missing Da point. Whatever it is, maybe if YOU would have been in the Kurdish village that day, YOU would have believed that Saddam HAD Weapons of Mass Destruction.
            But keep believing the mainstream media. They need more sheep and lemmings.

          • Anonymous

            Gee that is what the Communist party USA is saying so you must be ??????????????????

          • http://www.facebook.com/major.peter.58 Major Peter

            Wikileaks’ new release from purloined files of the Department of Defense may help remind people that, contrary to popular opinion and media memes, the US did find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and in significant quantities. While the invasion of Iraq didn’t find huge stockpiles of new WMDs, it did uncover stockpiles that the UN had demanded destroyed as a condition of the 1991 truce that Saddam Hussein abrogated for twelve years.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1490191581 Carolyn Hamilton

            Saddam had tons and tons of them.. They are now turning up in the other Countries.. THIS IS BEING REPORTED BY none other than MSNBC…..
            What rock you hiding under?

          • http://www.facebook.com/bill.brantner.5 Bill Brantner

            No, actually there were WMD’s in Iraq. I know. I was there! I know you bleeding heart liberals don’t want to hear it, but it’s the truth!!!!!!

          • don

            no know not  why man even you find liberials agreed with that. 

          • Anonymous

            Listen knowitsome numb nuts. wmds were there. The Syria military was being watched taking the crap into their country from Iraq, for Iraq. They were being watched by our U.S. forces at the time. They asked for permission to engaged but were denied. you get your brainless head out of your ass

          • Anonymous

            Go ask the Kurds if he had WMD.  I guess poison gas doesn’t count.  By the way, your Dems voted for the war. While we are on the topic, did you know that 2010 was the bloodiest year yet for American casualties in Afghanistan?  Of course you didn’t. When Bush was in office, we had a daily body count.  Since the Pravda media darling unvetted Obama has been in office, you hardly know a war is going on.  Morons.   You probably think that Kurds are something found in cottage cheese.  I now have to go back and re-read Glenn’s book “Arguing With Idiots.”  By the way, about the last 50 pages of the book consists of documentation for everything in the book – he is driving home the point that libs never document anything with facts.  They have no facts to back up what they claim.

          • Anonymous

            We gave him those, and they were gone by 2003. None were there by the time we invaded. Even bush knows it.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSN-Kku_rFE

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shane-Branning/100000402966734 Shane Branning

            Yes, he moved them into the baka valley in Syria. Just like he sent his aircraft to Iran, his arch enemy, to keep coalition forces from destroying them. Now Syria is using the chemical weapons against the population in a civil war.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Norm-Leiding/100001402285250 Norm Leiding

            Why dont you ask the Kurds about WMD’s?  Oh that’s right you cant because saddam used them to gas the Kurds or do you think all those dead people are fake?

          • Paul

             If he didn’t then what was it that he was using against the Kurds, Please tell us what it was. Mr know nothing

          • http://www.facebook.com/deuce.bigelow1 Deuce Bigelow

            … there are those who know. If you think our government doesn’t lie then you have never worked for them… just saying!

          • Anonymous

            No, as someone who was there and saw stuff, I will say it.

          • Malcolm Atteberry

            hey KnowNotEnough… where do you think Libya got the WMD materials that Kadaffi gave up a month later? Wal*Mart? 

            How bout all those rounds of sarin gas shells? The US calls those WMD’s, don’t they count?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ron-Rosmer/100001132818543 Ron Rosmer

             One thing that can be said about the “majority” is that the majority is almost always wrong. Can we all say “Hole in the Ozone”, “Y2K disaster”, and “Global Warming”? The liberals just don’t get it.  What will it take, N.Korea and another 911 attack?  No.  “If even someone was to come back from the
            dead…” you people would remain unconvinced.

          • http://www.facebook.com/sean.leurini Sean Leurini

            “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.” Patrick Henry Virginia Ratifying Convention June 5, 1788

        • Anonymous

          Your right John. They had a month or two to move everything while the DEMS. discussed the matter .Patton moved a whole division in a shorter time 

      • David Benson

        Hey you and all your left commie friends can get out,I will help you to get out if thats what it takes.

        • Anonymous

          David, no worries, soon “Know it some” will be knocking on doors begging for food, shelter and protection and our answers will be…
          you made your bed, lie in it, we help like kinded individuals who love our Nation, follow our laws, our Constitution & help themselves and others. should have listened and should have prepared- you had 5 yrs to do so.  Gene control!

          • Anonymous

            You’ve seen too many movies. Get back to reality.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kenneth-Snyder/100000748970554 Kenneth Snyder

            CVonservatives live in the real world-It is the Libs that live in a fantasy world.

        • Anonymous

          Ahhh, idle threats against other Americans by someone unable to have a civilized discussion. You all are such great patriots.

          • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

            Why don’t you go back to Media Matters and leave us honest people alone.

            You’re scared shitless of Conservatives, that’s why you spend so much time here spewing your leftist garbage.

            We’re not buying.

          • Anonymous

            I think they are all agitated because I have been dabbling in Left wing Blogs?

            I got a 32 thumbs down last nite in Raw Story! (a record?) And I agreed with them about the conclusion? Of course my deliberative reasoning, supporting my position (and theirs) was an irritant as they prefer telling people what to do and how to do it BUT NOT WHY it is a good idea?

            Ouch!

          • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

            You’re not one of them and they can’t tolerate that. They are libtards who only agree with each other over at Raw Story. Their moderator bans people on their say so.

            You’re next. I read your post yesterday and their replies to them. They can’t quite seem to understand anything that they haven’t been pre-programmed with.

          • Anonymous

            I’m not one of you and you can’t tolerate that. You can’t quite seem to understand anything that you haven’t been pre-programmed with.

          • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

            No programming here you pitiful moron.

          • greywolfrs

            Why don’t you idiots keep trying to repeal the Second Amendment and see if they are idle threats.

          • Anonymous

            You’re the most cowardly of them all, wimp. Now it’s past your bedtime and your mamma needs the computer back, child.

          • greywolfrs

            You are such joke, that all you got? Weak little kid.

      • Anonymous

        Deflection.  Address the poll.

      • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

        I am sorry put your point is devoid of any sort of reason or logic. 14 people still got stab 2 on close to death how is that a good thing? I guess you liberals only care as long as it is the right weapon. See you can’t use this because he used a knife and you can’t tell me if someone shot him in the face that the outcome would be the same chances are he would of only got to one person before someone shot him. so go ahead make crap up.

        • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

          Sam, leftist Libtards are ignorant people. They put their ignorance on display every day.

        • Anonymous

          For the third time, no one said it was a good thing.

          • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

            And for the third time you are ignoring facts that if someone had a gun this crazy would not have stab 14 people because he would have been shot and stop dead in his tracks literally but I guess you liberals prefer to have everyone defenseless so one of these mad men can go all stabby and kill 50 people because no one had a gun. That is the liberal dream people dying of knife wounds with no way of defending themselves. I sear the only reason you liberals think people can’t handle guns is because you think the world is like you guys mentality unstable. like this liberal. http://menrec.com/unreal-one-of-bloombergs-mayors-against-illegal-guns-arrested-for-trying-to-force-man-to-have-sex-with-him-at-gunpoint/

          • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

            Sam, it doesn’t figure into their anti gun rhetoric. He’s an idiot leftist.

      • Anonymous

        And it is people like you that will scream the loudest when someone comes after you, and there is noone to help you.

        • Anonymous

          Where were the people to help the children in Connecticut? Or the people going to the movies in Colorado? 
          Your fantasy about a hero coming in and saving the day is a lie. It doesn’t happen. There have been armed guards at some locations and it didn’t prevent the shooting. 
          Anyway, am I supposed to believe one of you would help anyone anyway? Right.

          • Anonymous

            The shooter in Colorado was an Obama supporter and had worked for his campaign.

          • greywolfrs

            I will guarantee that if I know it’s you, you shouldn’t expect any help. Here’s a thought, try helping yourself, douche bag.

          • Anonymous

             Exactly! There was no body there with a gun, because it was a gunfree zone. Yesterday, somebody took a gunman down before he fired a shot. No massacre there, because it wasn’t a gun-free zone. NO MORE GUN FREE ZONES. They are too dangerous.

      • Anonymous

        Wow really ? Every thing about the democrats is a lie ! Bengahzie , national debt, healthcare, 2nd amendment . The list can go on and on. So I don’t see how you can talk about the conservatives ! You all are the ones who refuse to see the facts !!

        • Anonymous

          Beghazi didn’t happen? There’s no national debt? The 2nd amendment is a lie? 
          If you’re talking about facts, it’s unclear which ones you mean. Can you be specific?

      • justthefaxs

        Hate to burst your bubble but it was not the conservatives that got the U.S. turned upside down, inside out, and loosing everything that was constitutionally correct in the last 4 going on 5 years.

      • greywolfrs

        So, this poll doesn’t exist and isn’t a fact? You wouldn’t know a fact if it walked up, kicked you between the legs and gave you a fat lip.

        P.S. Don’t bother to reply, if I wanted an opinion from a dick, I’d jack off.

      • http://www.facebook.com/terry.elliott.7165 Terry Elliott

         So, what the hell are you but some dumazz pos liberal that “Can’t Understand Normal Thinking”???? You obviously have no knowledge of our Constitution or the Bill of Rights or you wouldn’t make such stupid remarks. Do you have the mental capacity to understand a single sentence, written in a manner that even a person with an 8th grade education can understand??? You liberal gobs of vomit are unAmerican & constantly wrong, wrong, wrong!!!! You miscreants don’t have the mental acuity to think, all you can do is feel! What a waste of space you are & I deeply resent you breathing our good air. You are a worthless gob of excrement, idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • http://twitter.com/DenEstr den estr

        Knowitnothing! Oh and Obama is better you idiot! Does selling guns to Mexican drug
        cartels and Al Qaeda, which Obama has done, any better? Obama should be
        in prison! He deliberately sent Ambassador Stevens to be a liaisons
        between Obama and Al Qaeda to sell them guns which was a death mission
        unknown to Steven’s. Obama also tried to cover up his arms dealing by
        sending Sean Smith to clean out the information off the computers which
        would incriminate Obama and prove his illegal selling of arms to Al
        Qaeda, which was also a death mission for Smith that he wasn’t aware of.
        I am a Libertarian and can’t be put into your little box and your small
        mindedness comments of being a Conservative. 

      • Anthony A

         wow! it sounds like u listen msnbs…the least watched so called news network lol! DOPES!

      • http://TheConservativePush.webs.com/ SoThere

        Facts are lies told over and over until low information Libtards believe them, right?

      • Anonymous

        So liberals are what? Never mind I’ll tell you a bunch of very of sick people who want to follow Obama and transform the United States into the United Socialist States. .`

      • Anonymous

        Maybe you should change your name to NO Wit or Dim wit. That would be much more applicable. You probably don’t believe we landed on the Moon, that mostly Saudi’s caused 9/11 or that Japan attacked Pearl harbor. Keep living in your delusional little dream world. We love it when the enemy is full of idiots and morons.

      • Logical Me

         Are you referring to the Iraq war that BILL CLINTON launched on December 16, 1998?  Call me a liar?  Look for yourself.

        http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS

      • http://twitter.com/dirtcurt dirtcurt

        Knowitsome plays leapfrog with unicorns, that is why he knows they exist.  Stay on subject fool.

      • don

        know some turns out to not know anything. ops its a marixs a true blue coolaid drinker of the high order.  

      • Anonymous

        Liberals remind me of a one legged man in an ass kicking contest.
         

      • Anonymous

        Ask a Kurd if Saadam had any WMD’s – oops, sorry they are dead. Do you mean the Iraq war that all the libs voted for?  Give me an example of one – just one – fact that the lunatic libs believe in.  The following are NOT examples:  global warming; Obama pulled the troops out of Afghanistan within the promised 11 mos of his first term; closing GITMO; 7.6% unemployment rate (actual is 15%); Lies, lies, lies, and more lies out of the mouth of the “Liar-in-Chief”  Obama is a pathological liar.  How anyone can support the unvetted, fraud, Marxist who came out and said such kind words about the Grand Lady, Margaret Thatcher – not!  Obama hated Thatcher because she exposed socialism for what it is – a failed philosophy.  Obama so loved the poor that he created millions more.  Worst President in history.  No, worst anti-leader of any country in history. 

      • Anonymous

        As you probably won’t remember, because your “fact” loving liberal media forgot to remind you, it was Bill Clinton and Al Gore that first insisted Iraq had weapons of mass destruction–there are at least nine documented situations of them talking about them.  Bush had only been in office 6 months, so he (and all of Congress, including Mrs. Clinton) were going off of the Clinton Admininistrations information when they voted to move into Iraq.  Therefore, you can laugh all you want and think you are so smart, but if there were no WMD’d it is really your own party who was blind.

      • http://www.facebook.com/sean.leurini Sean Leurini

        One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop
        weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom
        line.”–President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4,
        1998″If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our
        purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s
        weapons of mass destruction program.”–President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17,
        1998″Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there
        matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will
        use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the
        greatest security threat we face.”–Madeline
        Albright, Feb 18, 1998″He will use those weapons of mass
        destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”–Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser,
        Feb, 18, 1998″[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and
        consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions
        (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
        respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of
        mass destruction programs.”Letter to President Clinton, signed by:– Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John
        Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998″Saddam Hussein has been engaged
        in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat
        to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection
        process.”-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec.
        16, 1998″Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building
        weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”– Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov.
        10, 1999

      • http://www.facebook.com/sean.leurini Sean Leurini

        lol you got slapped down!

      • Anonymous

         Just what are the facts then genius? Share them with us!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1298990430 Mark Hubbard

       of course that way you start the path to the new order

    • http://www.facebook.com/freddy.diguglielmo Freddy Di Guglielmo

      Sam… Where have you been for the last 3 decades??  I want to go there!!!  :)

      • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

        Frist I only been alive 2 and half decades and second I live in the back woods of Pennsylvania. We don’t take any bull from liberals here.

    • http://www.cin.org/avatar.html hrstockert

       Actually, no, they’re NOT “ignoring” the facts……they’re actively distorting and concealing facts in order to foster their agenda.   The “facts” they present as “facts” are those of the “everybody knows that” type, at which point you can be quite sure nobody knows any such thing.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1490191581 Carolyn Hamilton

        They are following RULES FOR RADICALS, book written by SOL ALinsky.
        Lie, Lie, Lie, Lie, continue to lie and eventually the people will believe you.
        Everyone should read this book.. Obama couldn’t make it a day without the book.

        • Anonymous

           Saul Alinsky.

          • Darthinton

            So what is your take? Pro or Con.???

          • Steve Brody

            Sol, is the sun of Saul…  lol!!

      • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

        Their leaders may not be but the blind like knownothing are willingly ignoring facts because their masters tell them to.

    • http://www.facebook.com/terry.elliott.7165 Terry Elliott

       Sam, liberals hate our Constitution because it limits gov’t when what they want is a constitution that limits the people. Well…………….liberals can kiss my royal red Scottish derriere!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The 2nd Amendment is part of our Constitution & so shall it remain. They can bi itch & moan, try everything they can to subvert it but you know what, they will not succeed!!!! As I & many have said & MEAN EVERY BLOODY WORD, FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No way in hell will they ever take away my Constitutional rights is to murder my ass & I am deadly phuquing serious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BGC7U7QUFEWSSV3H4IFHLAFK54 mudslide

         yessir!

        Besides – what guns, I lost mine fishing….

    • Patriot

      YES!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1497705723 Don Staples

      never confuse liberals with facts…just pisses them off and the name calling starts…

    • http://www.facebook.com/david.hester.319 David Hester

      Facts dont matter to neither Democrat nor Republican politician.   They want the power, they care nothing for your rights.

      • http://youtu.be/0iRCvDwF26Q Sam Fisher

        Yes I believe that is the case.

    • don

      the facts have nothing to do with their agenda.–whitch is to disarm the people

    • http://twitter.com/CaleSoep Cale Soep

      If you think Teresa`s story is shocking,, a month ago my friend also broght in $7318 grafting twelve hour’s a week from home and the’re friend’s sister`s neighbour was doing this for 3 months and worked and got paid more than $7318 in there spare time on their mac. apply the tips from this address……… ZOO80.ℂom

    • http://www.facebook.com/sean.leurini Sean Leurini

      “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.” Patrick Henry Virginia Ratifying Convention June 5, 1788

  • http://www.artinphoenix.com/gallery/grimm snowleopard (cat folk gallery)

    It will hurt us by leaving us exposed to criminals and an ever more oppressive government. It is only a matter of time before the gun-control becomes gun-confiscation, official or unofficial, and the usage of force will come when people refuse to surrender their firearms.

  • http://www.facebook.com/johne.maddeniii John E Madden III

    The “experts” have spoken…..and thats good enough for me!
    I dont make my living…dealing with the scumbags, and urchins of society—but I do know they exsist!!!!
    THERE IS NO BETTER SOURCE…of in-put, on this subject, than those THAT DO!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/johne.maddeniii John E Madden III

    The “experts” have spoken…..and thats good enough for me!
    I dont make my living…dealing with the scumbags, and urchins of society—but I do know they exsist!!!!
    THERE IS NO BETTER SOURCE…of in-put, on this subject, than those THAT DO!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gary-Howe/100000006283728 Gary Howe

    I believe these results would also support non-violent felons  the second amendment right to bare arms as well. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/lou.brown Lou Ellen Brown

    Thanks for sharing on facebook.This is more important and meaningful than all of the stupid faces and “funny” comments of the most ignorant and unpleasant vice president in my lifetime. I trust our law men and women and feel that they and the military are underpaid for the danger most of them face daily.

  • Anonymous

    Yes, all arms should be naked! Sleeveless tops for all!!!!!! It’s our constitutional right!

  • Anonymous

    Yes, all arms should be naked! Sleeveless tops for all!!!!!! It’s our constitutional right!

  • Anonymous

    BWAHAHAHAH! YES ALL PART OF OUR MASTER PLAN!

  • JohnWolf

    Why is Obama and his backers and supporters all about control?  Obamacare is more about control than medicine.  It inflicts multiple penalties on the Doctors and Patients.

    While building a huge database of personal information.  

  • JohnWolf

    Ladies and Gentlemen.  Prepare yourself.  This Summer, there will be a large number of Flash Mobs, Flash Robs, and Home Invasions.  The Obama supporters have discovered that the Police cannot be everywhere at once.

    When the weather warms up, defend yourselves.  Do not be a victim.  Remember, when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000566962714 Sandra Graham

      John, did you watch Southland this week?

  • JohnWolf

    The United States has tried to take guns away from the law abiding citizens.  It was a disaster.  The Feds took the guns away from the Law Abiding people and left them at the hands of the looters.

    True Story:  read the book, “Great New Orleans Gun Grab.”  This is what Obama and his supporters want to do to you.

    The Feds took the guns away from law abiding citizens after Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.  It was a big mistake.  Only the bad guys had guns and they took advantage of that fact.

  • JohnWolf

    Knowitsome.  How long have you worked for Soros?

    Does he pay well?
    Do you need a GED?
    Can you work from your mother’s basement?

    Just curious.  Where do you sign up.

  • Anonymous

    “actually, the rest of the civilized world laughs at our obsession with guns and the ridiculous gun violence rates we have here compared to them.”

    Check out their rates of total violent crime.  Far greater than ours, because we have guns.  They tend to kill and maim with bottles, pipes, bike chains, and knives.  Look at the Swiss.  They have compulsory military service and take their rifles, REAL assault rifles, home with them.  Their violent crime rate from guns and all other objects is extremely low.  Guns in the hands of law abiding citizens are used for self defense over 2 million times a year, most often without a shot having to be fired.  You want facts?  Look at the peer reviewed studies by John  Lott.

  • Anonymous

    Where is gun crime the highest? is it high in Chicago, which is one of the most restricted gun control area? Why is that? Just questions to ponder.

  • Anonymous

    The old adage stands…. Outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns. I do not know where any of these new “Backround Check” proponents get thier information. I have bought guns locally and on the internet and both required a FFL and FBI instant backround check. The thug on the street is not going to go through a FFL dealer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1298990430 Mark Hubbard

     same in the city of Detroit where i’m from and everyone know of Detroit

  • http://www.facebook.com/Pugnation Dan Beaudry

    Product Information: PoliceOne is a resource and information website. We host product information on behalf of our paying sponsors, but we do not sell anything directly. If you would like to purchase a product or have questions about pricing/availability/etc., please direct those inquiries to the item’s manufacturer via their website. You can also view a company directory or browse our products page.

  • Anonymous

     “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Harry-Rhoades/100001488078492 Harry Rhoades

    You’re getting slow Mr. Beck.  I’ve already shared this info around for two days on facebook.  But thanks for bringing it to the attention of others.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BGC7U7QUFEWSSV3H4IFHLAFK54 mudslide

    This should not even be a topic of debate.
     

  • Anonymous

    Liberalism is a genetic disorder masked as a political position in the scheme of things. Retardation runs a close second….and yes take your political correctness and shove it Knowitsome! 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1473489680 Brian Delamer

    I’m just glad that so many gun manufacturers are moving here to Texas.  To Quote Davey Crockett, “You may all go to Hell and I will go to Texas!!”

  • Anonymous

    Liberal don’t care about the Constitution unless it will help them. Why are things like this put in the newspaper and media other than this? It may cost a few buck, but the media understands money when you are dying on  the vine!

  • Daniel F. Melton

    The people who are in trenches of law enforcement are the ones to ask about the effects of ‘gun control’.  Of course, libs will refuse to hear this.

  • greywolfrs

    AHHH, the left wing troll is here to try and debunk anything that does not support the left wing moronic agenda.

  • Old American

    Maybe it is just me, but a lot of the politicians look like those crooked car dealers that they show in some of the movies and some of the advertising.

  • Guest

    “The people who are dealing with this every day are telling you, please let the people have their guns,” Glenn said in reaction to the results.
    What’s that liquid dripping from Glenn Beck’s hands? Oh, right: it’s the blood of children, siblings, parents and grandparents murdered by someone who should not have access to weapons of mass murder.

    Why do they make those large magazines? To kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible.

    Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness IN THAT ORDER! Dead children will never have liberty, and Beck is helping the insane have access to these people killing magazines.

    • http://twitter.com/ugottabekidn Noneya מאמין

       So when MY family is murdered because a guy or two or three comes into my house with illegal guns, and I don’t have my LEGAL gun with a LEGAL magazine made for killing as many BAD GUYS as QUICKLY as POSSIBLE, Y O U  will have OUR blood on YOUR hands.
      WE are NOT the PROBLEM!!!

      • Guest

        Your scenario has NEVER happened, not once! If you need more than 10 rounds to fend off attackers, you need a class in how to shoot.

        On the other hand, mass murders take place all the time.

        Do the math.

        • Anonymous

           “Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion…in private self-defense.”
          John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions (1787-88).

           “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”
          Samuel Adams, during Massachusetts’ U.S. Constitution Ratification Convention (1788).

          “The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation…(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”
          James Madison, The Federalist #46.

          “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence.”
          George Washington.

          “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
          Thomas Jefferson, Proposed Virginia Constitution (1776), Jefferson Papers 344 (J. Boyd, ed. 1950).

          “The great object is, that every man be armed…Everyone who is able may have a gun…”
          Patrick Henry, 3 Elliott Debates 386.

          “Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.”
          Thomas Paine, Thoughts on Defensive War (1775).

          “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.”
          Patrick Henry, during Virginia’s ratification convention (1788).

           “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America can not enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”
          Noah Webster, An Examination Into the Leading Principals of the Federal Constitution (1787).
           

        • greywolfrs

          And Mag size means nothing, I can reload in less than 2 seconds. Moron.

          • Guest

            In two seconds, you can be tackled and stopped from killing more children…Yeah, so who’s the “moron?” Mag size means everything! 

            11 children escaped in Sandy Hook when he reloaded, so stop showing the world how ignorant you are about this subject.

          • greywolfrs

            2 seconds is not long enough, I am not a fool, like you. Besides, he had three guns in total. Why don’t you try to “tackle” someone when they have three guns. Moron.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=71305293 Denver Foster

      And where can i buy a ” weapons of mass murder”? and is there a limit?

    • Anonymous

      You just answered your own solution, dumbass! It’s the mentally ill (insane) who are committing these murders, not sane, law abiding citizens. So why aren’t the Dumbocrats passing laws that will get these individuals off the streets instead of going after everybody but the mentally ill that are the biggest cause of these mass murders?

    • greywolfrs

      Hey vicki tiffany, the Second Amendment means you have no right to ban anything. Dumb M F er. By the way, why are still being a coward and not logging into your account? Punk.

  • Patriot

    No Surprises here!

  • Anonymous

    Everything the left is doing on gun control is aimed at disarming the citizens.  The Constitution is irrelevant to them.  Facts to not mean anything to them.   That is part of the fundamental change being pushed.  

  • Patriot

    EVERY Honest LEO knows that We are responsible to protect ourselves, they just come & do the paperwork after someone dies.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sandra.young.75 Sandra Young

    how come I can only tweet or google this article?  I thought Glenn hated google … why no fb or email ???

    • http://www.facebook.com/jack.klugh Jack’s Favorite Daughter

      I’m on FB

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=71305293 Denver Foster
  • Anonymous

    “Arms in the hands of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion…in private self-defense.”
    John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions (1787-88).

     “The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”
    Samuel Adams, during Massachusetts’ U.S. Constitution Ratification Convention (1788).

    “The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation…(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”
    James Madison, The Federalist #46.

    “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence.”
    George Washington.

    “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
    Thomas Jefferson, Proposed Virginia Constitution (1776), Jefferson Papers 344 (J. Boyd, ed. 1950).

    “The great object is, that every man be armed…Everyone who is able may have a gun…”
    Patrick Henry, 3 Elliott Debates 386.

    “Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.”
    Thomas Paine, Thoughts on Defensive War (1775).

    “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.”
    Patrick Henry, during Virginia’s ratification convention (1788).

     “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America can not enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”
    Noah Webster, An Examination Into the Leading Principals of the Federal Constitution (1787).

    • greywolfrs

      The Founders were some pretty smart guys. The problem they never envisioned was the part of the population that is going along with this agenda. You know, the idiots like knowsnothing and vicki tiffany (who is posting as “guest”). For as smart as the Founders were, they could never have accounted for those left wing fools.

      • Guest

        Actually, little child (adults don’t call men “vicki,” but no one accuses Beck’s followers of being the adults in the room), the Framers put the 2nd Amendment in place for national defense and to put down internal rebellions, esp. slave rebellions.

        We no longer have slaves, and we have a standing Army, Navy, Air Force and the Marines. THAT is what the Framers never envisioned, so shove your insults up your poop chute. It’s Beck’s followers who embarrass this country day after day, the “Ugly Americans.”

        “This agenda,” is to save childrens’ lives. You’re just too dim to understand the need for this, and that’s not my problem because YOU’RE in the minority!

        • Anonymous

           You want to save children’s lives?

          Then let the teachers exercise their Second Amendment right.

          Perps never attack a police station because they know the people in there are armed. They would quit attacking schools for the same reason if they knew there was going to be someone in there that was going to shoot back.

          And last, no one that has ever been in a firefight has ever said,”I think I had to many bullets.”

           

        • greywolfrs

          Hey, it’s the coward, vicki tiffany. Try reading the ENTIRE Second Amendment and especially the part about the right of the people keep and bear arms. It was not only for national defense or to put down slave rebellions, it was to protect the people from tyrannical government. The very tyrannical government you support, but are too dumb to realize it.  You really should try reading the Constitutional Debates of 1787, dumb M F er.

          Actually, punk, I call you “vicki” for being a little bitch.

    • Anonymous

      Now if only they (dems) could pull their head out of the dark place or the scales from their eyes so they may see; If they could also understand when reading the Constitution and the words of the Founding Fathers.

  • Anonymous

    Facts are never a problem for democratic demonrats , because they just make up their own as they go along .

  • Terry Carter

    i watch you and alex jones , you guys are on the same side. please agree to disagree. prohibition of firearms will work out the same or worse than alcohol prohibition in the 1930s.

  • http://WWW.SPIRITOFAMERICAPARTYRADIOSHOW.COM TOM P O’DONNELL
  • Anonymous

     “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves…and include all men capable of bearing arms. To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms…”
    Richard Henry Lee, Additional letters from The Federal Farmer 53 (1788).

     “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people…To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
    George Mason, during Virginia’s ratification convention (1788).

     “Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American…The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
    Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, February 20, 1788.

     Current law: “The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age. The classes of the militia are (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard, and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members on the militia who are not members of the National Guard.”
    Title 10, Section 311(a) of the United States Code.

     “On every question of construction let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying to determine what meaning can be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”
    Thomas Jefferson.

  • Anonymous

     “Men by their constitutions are naturally divided into two parties: 1) Those who fear and distrust the people 2) Those who identify themselves with the people, have confidence in them, cherish and consider them as the most honest and safe depository of the public interest.”
    Thomas Jefferson.

     “A government which does not trust its citizens to be armed is not itself to be trusted.”
    Niccolo Machiavelli.

     “They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
    Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759).

     “In Switzerland, where the citizens are most armed, they are most free.”
    Niccolo Machiavelli.

     “When firearms go, all goes. We need them every hour.”
    George Washington.

  • Anonymous

     “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches us that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.”
    Adolph Hitler, Hitler’s Table-Talk at the Fuhrer’s Headquarters, 1941-1942.

     “Those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
    George Santayana.

     “Gun registration is not enough.”
    Attorney General, Janet Reno, December 10, 1993 (A.P.).

     “The most effective means of fighting crime in the United States is to outlaw the possession of any type of firearm by the civilian population.”
    Attorney General, Janet Reno, 1991 speech to B’nai B’rith in Fort Lauderdale (St. Louis Post-Dispatch, August 25, 1996, p. 3B).

     “What good does it do to ban some guns? All guns should be banned.”
    Sen. Howard Metzanbaum.

     “Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.”
    Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control, to Sen.Howard Metzanbaum, The National Educator, January 1994, p. 3.

     “We’re going to have to take this one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily— given the political realities— going to be very modest. Our ultimate goal—total control of all guns—is going to take time. The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced and sold in this country. The second problem is to get handguns registered, and the final problem is to make possession of all handguns, and all handgun ammunition totally illegal.”
    Nelson T. (Pete) Shields, III, founding Chair of Handgun Control, Inc.

     “The only real justification (for the assault weapons ban) is not to reduce crime but to desensitize the public to the regulation of weapons in preparation for their ultimate confiscation.”
    Charles Krauthammer, “To Control Crime, Control Guns” (St. Louis Post-Dispatch, April 7, 1996, p.3B, emphasis added).

     “There are more instances of abridgment of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments…than by violent and sudden usurpations.”
    James Madison, June 16, 1788.

     “All military type firearms are to be handed in immediately…The S.S., S.A., and Stahlhelm give every respectable German man the opportunity of campaigning with them, therefore, anyone who does not belong to one of the above organizations and who unjustifiably keeps his weapon…must be regarded as an enemy of the national government.”
    SA Oberfuhrer of Bad Tolz (March, 1933).

     “I see creeping fascism in America, just as in Germany, a drip at a time: a law here, a law there, all supposedly passed to protect the public. The German people really believed that only hoodlums owned such (unregistered) guns. What fools we were. It truly frightens me to see how the government, media, and some police groups in America are pushing for the same mindset.”
    Theodore Haas, survivor of Dachau and the Holocaust.

     “The authority of the (state) is not limited by checks and controls, by special autonomous bodies or individual rights. The concept of personal liberties of the individual as opposed to the authority of the state had to disappear. There are no personal liberties of the individual which fall outside of the realm of the state. The Constitution is therefore not based upon a system of inborn and inalienable rights of the individual.”
    Ernst Huber, 1933 speech to National Socialist Workers (NAZI) Party, quoted in The Ominous Parallels, Leonard Peikoff (Stein & Day, N.Y. 1982) p.6.

     “Citizens! Turn in your weapons.”
    English translation of Soviet Union Poster (1919).

     “Armas para que?” (“Guns for what?”)
    Fidel Castro, 1959, in a speech urging the people to turn in their guns because they were no longer needed with him in control.

     “In today’s Cuba, only those who hold absolute power over the people are armed.”
    Max Jorge (Cuban exile).

     Contrast with: “There is only one fundamental right (all the others are its consequences or corollaries): A man’s right to his own life. The Bill of Rights was not directed against private citizens, but against the government— as an explicit declaration that individual rights supersede any public or social power.”
    Ayn Rand, “Man’s Rights,” The Virtue of Selfishness, at 108, 110-112 (Signet Books, N.Y., 1970).

  • Anthony A

    liberals will lie steal & cheat you so that they can get full and collective control  of your freedoms & rights, they would love to get rid of the constitution which king obama already said…its up to us patriots to make sure they are defeated and removed from our country!!!

    • jonathan larche

      Ask a liberal to control abortion. Then you will see some talking.

  • Anonymous

    Why is it illegal to yell “FIRE” in a crowded theater when there is not one? It “violates” the right to free speech in the name of public safety.

    Why should it be illegal to buy a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds? It “violates” the right to bear arms in the name of public safety.

    The only people who need large magazines are mass murderers and soldiers.  Period.

    • jonathan larche

      When the government reduces its arms, we can then talk about reducing ours.

    • Anonymous

       No one that has ever been in a firefight has ever said after it is over, I think I brought to many bullets.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1319556049 Bill Menard

    Hitler Killed millions with gas in my oppinion he used Gas as a WMD

  • Anonymous

    Yes. So?

  • Richard Brophy

    Can somebody please print those stats out and slap them into the face of Obama?

    • Guest

      Why? It’s not a scientific poll!

      Most people support Obama on assault rifles, magazine size limits and background checks.

      Do NOT believe what Beck says, or risk being laughed at.

  • Anonymous

    Stats about a random internet poll? Yeah, I”m sure he cares. It means nothing. It’s not a real study.

  • Anonymous

    A firefight? We’re not talking about war, we’re talking about civilian life.

  • Anonymous

    What do their nukes have to do with assault rifles and large-capacity magazines?

  • Anonymous

    “The thing about internet quotes is that it’s hard to verify their authenticity.”
    –Abraham Lincoln.

  • Anonymous

    “The thing about internet quotes is that it’s really hard to verify their authenticity.”

    –Albert Einstein.

  • Anonymous

    There were armed guards at Columbine and they did nothing. 

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4DW23G4VU2HJAPBFZ7OHNC2FVY John

      There was one guard at Columbine and he did a lot. He got the school emptied and the kids to safety. He was at lunch at the other end of the school, ran to the front of the school where the cowards were and took shots at them and kept them from killing anyone else. GET Your facts straight liberal liar. That is all you do, lie and bear false witness against your neighbor. Evil

      • Anonymous

        Why didn’t he stop it? Why didn’t his gun save any lives?

  • Anonymous

    I love how Obama will use the BULLY pulpit to have a group of law enforcement officials to stand behind him when he PRETENDS to care about ILLEGAL gun activity ( HELLO! can you say Chicago murder rates among black teens or “Fast and Furious”??? ) , then we see what police officers REALLY think when they can be a part of an anonymous survey.
     
    Speaking of hypocrisy. if GWBush had used Air Force One to transport dozens of Pro-Life or Anti-“Gay” marriage groups to DC, don’t you think the liberal media would go ballistic ( please pardon the artillery terminology )?  Where’s the outrage that the People’s Plane is being used to further his agenda by having the TAXPAYERS pay for that flight? What’s next Obama? Are you
    going to invite Planned Parenthood to further Margaret Sangers cause and call it Air Abort One ( more black fetus) ?

  • Anonymous

    Numbers don’t lie, Liberals Do

    Liberalism is a Mental Disorder

    • Anonymous

      The headline is a big lie. The survey has nothing to do with what most law enforcement officers agree on.

  • Anonymous

       Notice how the left change the discussion, any discussion they can’t win, to something that has nothing to do with the conversation?

  • Anonymous

    German Progressives took guns away from Lawful Citizens except for hunting and look at how well those people survived. 6 Million of them were rounded up and gassed in showers in Poland and around Europe or the Third Reich Empire.

    It leads to todays problem in the Middle East because nobody even America after WWII did not want these people in their country. So we shipped them to the Eastern Mediterranean in 1948 and created two Gov’ts to rule over the two peoples. One party accepted the deal the other started a WAR, which they lost. They were given the option of having 75% of the land at the time but they instead started a WAR to push the other side out and they failed at the WAR. 

    And now they have less than 25% of what was offered to them in 1948 and they still insist on starting WARS..

    • Anonymous

      Another genius that thinks that the Nazis were socialist. The Democratic Republic of North Korea is quite democratic, too. And Starfish really are stars.

      • Anonymous

        And what do you think the Title “NAZI” stands for? If your parents lived in Germany at the time they could tell you. Even World History Teachers would tell you. Why don’t you ask one of them instead of being a TOOL OF EVIL. Think for yourself not others. And if you think that the North Korean People voted for their starvation then you are truly a Starfish.

        • Anonymous

          LOL.
          Very good. The Democratic Republic of North Korea isn’t a democracy.
          And the National Socialist Party wasn’t socialist.

          Is it starting to make sense now?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1533270960 Jason Fleming

    Its morons like you knowitnot!  who are turning the USA into the laughing stock of the world. You can’t see whats right in front of you. Conservative/liberal  doesn’t matter we are Americans and We need to stand for what is best for the entire country. Wake the F/ck up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Anonymous

    Net result, guns save lives. That’s why law enforcement in general support concealed carry.   

  • Anonymous

    thanks for telling us about this Survey Glenn,i wouldnt had known cuz NO ONE else shows nor talks about it,now that survey is a huge wow ,it blows my mind and knowing those are Cops answering the question makes it so much more important to all of us

    yes i admit i dont like getting a ticket from the same Cop,BUT if nothing else, this survey shows that the cops cant do it all by themselfs and that they would love to go home to their family’s as much as we do

  • Laird

    @Knowitsome:disqus Your friends Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and many other Lefties at that time also believed that Saddam had WMDs. They all, including Bush, believed the intelligence they had received from our intel assets! For Saddam it became a simple matter of moving his stuff across the border into Syria where, I’m sure, they remain today.

    • greywolfrs

      Maybe that’s why Obamao warned Assad not to use them on his own people. That idiot lacks critical thinking skills and could never put 2 and 2 together.

      • Anonymous

        Assad has had them and has been known to have them. No new ones magically arrived. You’re in way over your head, dummy.

        • greywolfrs

          Really? Just like Saddam had them and USED them, but keep spouting your left wing stupidity.

    • Anonymous

      They didn’t declare war. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/TheOriginalBlueWhale Dean Hempel

    This doesn’t surprise me as I believe that guns have saved many more lives than imagined.  Law enforcement realizes that properly trained citizens are the best defense against violence.  Law enforcement is a delayed response and too often a late reaction to violence.

    • Anonymous

      You believe that, huh? LOL.

  • Anonymous

    The mistake that we make is in thinking that the left is stupid, incompetent or well intentioned wrong.  They are not.  They know exactly what they are doing and what they are after.  A socialist government that controls all aspects of our lives ruled by the political elite.  There are 545 decision makers in our government and if something is it is because they want it that way.  It makes no difference about facts, what citizens want or the evil that results, they will continue down the road of central government control ruled by the political class.  

    • Anonymous

      Right, we’re the ones that want to control what a woman does with her body and who we’re allowed to marry. Liberals! So controlling!
      What was that about not caring about facts?
      LOL.

  • http://drudgereport.com/ Myles Standish

    That is an excellent poll. The questions were fair and unbiased. Unlike some polls, this one did not word the questions in a manner designed to encourage you to answer one way or another.

    Excellent poll or not, it will remain a complete unknown outside of conservative/common sense websites. This is how the media gets their way, which is always the wrong way. This is how they manipulate public sentiment — by choosing what to print and broadcast, and what NOT to print and broadcast. They used to actually work for the people — as a government watch dog, exposing potential and perceived abuses of power and what not. Now they work strictly for the government — the public be screwed, blued and tattooed.

    As soon as the government was in step with the radical ideologies of leftist, pro-communist journalists and Hellyweed (95% of all journalists and movie industry employees), they completely abandoned their appointed and historical role as protectors of truth and freedom, and instead went into the business of promoting leftist ideals, a leftist potus and all things anti-democracy, anti-founding fathers and pro-tyranny.

    And the media scratches their collective head wondering why TV/radio/print viewership and readership are way down, and why conservative TV/radio/print viewership and readership are way up.

    Go figure. The liberal media committed occupational suicide byviolating the public trust in every way imaginable, and the only thing that is keeping their brain-dead existense on life support is the money of radical billionaire hypocrites like Soros and Gates who have agreed to fork over fortunes so long as they get a pass on the commie thing and get to keep living the life of captialists — the life they are intent upon destroying for all those beneath them.

  • Anonymous

    Kind of wondering what the left hand is doing while we are focusing on gun control.  (Obama goes to Israel – Obama comes to Denver – Colorado Governor Hickenlooper goes to Israel on his own dime…I think I have been watching too much Beck…lol

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1490191581 Carolyn Hamilton

    I listened to a radio show this afternoon, there was a loon politician on and he said the polls showed that 91% of America wanted background checks and stiffer bans.  To me their, “their” polls are like the polls before our last election.. FRAUD, LIES, and MORE.
    They continue to tell people things, and they start to believe it after hearing it over and over.
    SOL ALINSKY, rules for radicals.. The book teaches you all of this crap, lies corruption, and how to follow obama into presidency..
    Don’t believe anything they tell you…All of DC is corrupt.

    • Guest

      Why don’t you bother doing some research Carolyn. That way, you wouldn’t come across as an anti-science, anti-factual moron, not that Beck’s followers care much about science and facts.

  • Anonymous

    Beck has an agenda, so you won’t hear this from him:

    First of all, this is not a scientific poll. How many duplicate voters were there? People coming to ANY website to vote on a poll is just not how scientific polls are done. There is bias in who votes, who comes to a website to vote on ANY GIVEN poll. Go to their website; there is no claim that this is a scientific poll.
    Here’s an example: 64% believe that Beck is a dangerous, right-wing liar. (Poll results from glennbecksucks.com)So here are some scientific poll numbers:85-90% of Americans want universal background checks for weapon purchases.http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/91-percent-americans-support-gun-background-checks-poll-144348180–politics.html54-59% of Americans want a ban on the sales of assault rifles.http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/03/12/185595/poll-americans-want-background.htmlhttp://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/A_Politics/_Today_Stories_Teases/MJ_Marist%20Poll%20Release_April-2013.pdf55% of Americans favor stricter gun control laws.http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm63% of Americans want a ban on high capacity magazines.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/us/politics/lawmakers-look-at-ban-on-high-capacity-gun-magazines.html?_r=0Less than 20 percent of Americans think Glenn Beck is the right person to lead a religious renewal movement.
    http://www.christianpost.com/news/few-americans-think-glenn-beck-is-fit-to-head-religious-movt-46833/#xbuWkb7GWzzPivzy.99 

    • Anonymous

      And where did you pull those numbers out of?

      Let me give you a poll. Go and try to buy some ammunition for your weapons. If you have any.

      Go out and price an AR-15 today, when just two years ago it was selling at half the price it is today. Also there is a six month back log on that particular weapon by many manufacturers. Many Gun shops are completely out of the desirable weapons of choice.

      All ammunition manufacturers are producing at 24/7 and still can’t  keep up with the demand.

      Those are the real poll numbers!!!!!
       

      • Guest

        You’re not real bright, are you? These aren’t poll numbers (and I did cite references to answers your dumb question). You’re citing statistics. 

        I knew Beck’s crowd would not grasp the unscientific nature of the support for gun safety measures. Instead, you believe a proven liar like Glenn Beck.

        • Anonymous

          You use a broad paintbrush don’t you?

          I do not believe these “scientific polls” are always truly representative of a cross section of America. When I see dozens of people in the firearms purchases line; when you cannot find ammo on the shelf to purchase; when these polls don’t confirm what you see with your own eyes, it is difficult to put faith in them. I do not believe that the vast majority of Americans favor additional gun control. Besides, the government doesn’t enforce the laws we already have – what could possibly make me (or you) believe that more laws are going to help?

          By the way, I do not listen to Beck. I followed this link from a friend’s page. So put your paintbrush away.

    • Anonymous

      I question the validity of your polls. I know A LOT of gun owners and NONE of them believe what those polls claim MOST gun owners believe.

      By the way, not a single one of them has ever shot another person. Liberals really hate that. It defeats their phony statistics.

      • Anonymous

        Phony statistics, like Obama is going to win the election. Yes, I understand that Beck and his followers do NOT embrace science.

        • Anonymous

          You use a broad paintbrush don’t you?

          I do not believe these “scientific polls” are always truly representative of a cross section of America. When I see dozens of people in the firearms purchases line; when you cannot find ammo on the shelf to purchase; when these polls don’t confirm what you see with your own eyes, it is difficult to put faith in them. I do not believe that the vast majority of Americans favor additional gun control. Besides, the government doesn’t enforce the laws we already have – what could possibly make me (or you) believe that more laws are going to help?

          By the way, I do not listen to Beck. I followed this link from a friend’s page. So put your paintbrush away.

    • greywolfrs

      You are an idiot, vicki tiffany. You quote the NYT as a scientific poll? Man, your stupidity knows no bounds.

      • Anonymous

        The NY Times quotes a scientific poll, but you’re too lazy to bother reading, eh?

        Greyworlfs: standing in front of glass home throwing rocks at passers by.

        Who calls a man “vicky?”  Not any adult I know of, but NO ONE will ever accuse Beck’s followers of being the adults in the room.

        Smart people do not believe a proven liar, and Beck is a proven liar, so shove your insults up your poop chute old, old man/child.

        • greywolfrs

          They quote scientific polls?Which polls are those, the ones that say what they want them to say?

          I call you vicki, you are no man, just a little bitch.

    • Patriot

      Why don’t you go to Policeone’s site and tell THEM THEIR Poll is False?
      While you are at it, call the F.B.I. and tell THEM their Uniform Crime Report is wrong too!  You must be Dianne Feinstein!

      • Guest

        I’m e-mailing them now. I didn’t claim that their poll is “false;” I noted that website polls are NOT scientific. 

        I’m not Diane Feinstein, and you’re not concerned about the 3,600+ people who have been gunned down since Sandy Hook, including 6 children/day.

        You don’t have to be a senator to want to see the epidemic of gun violence stemmed by common sense gun safety laws to get weapons designed to kill many, many people off the streets.

  • Anonymous

    I hope the politicians are reading this survey

    • Anonymous

      Why? It’s NOT scientific!  Check out the source. There is NO CLAIM that this is a scientific poll. It’s good for right-wing propaganda, but inaccurate. 

      • Anonymous

         And those numbers you posted are REAL?

        Those are the same poll numbers used in the Healthcare debate.

        • Anonymous

          That doesn’t even make any sense. You need to stop listening to Glenn Beck. He is really dumbing you down.

    • Patriot

      They don’t care!. Trust Me, if they did, we would not be commenting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bill.brantner.5 Bill Brantner

    Actually knownothingatall, I’d believe a unicorn over a lying liberal!!!!

    • Anonymous

      That pretty much says it all.

  • Patriot

    The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that… it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.
    Thomas Jefferson

  • Patriot

    Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state.
    Thomas Jefferson

  • Patriot

    The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.
    Thomas Jefferson

  • Patriot

    If our Founding Fathers were here today, most all of our Government would either be in Prison, or shot, or hung. Only a FEW good Men exist in our Government. God Bless these Men!

  • Jerry Sutton

    apparently some D. A .  Liberals  can’t read  which is not surprising.   The source is mentioned in the leadup.   PoliceOne is a law enforcement website with more than 1.5 million
    unique visitors per month and 400,000 registered members. Between March 4
    and March 13, 2013, PoliceOne asked 15,000 verified active and retired
    law enforcement personnel more than 20 questions about how they believe
    stricter gun control will affect the community.

  • Patriot

    Firearms are Liberty’s TEETH!
    Geroge Washington

  • Patriot

    Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God.
    Benjamin Franklin

  • Billy GrahamCracker

    The Police and Sheriffs are realizing they are next, & so are their families. 

  • Anonymous

    Oh Really?  You want to “GIVE” me life saving advice?  Except it will cost me $37 bucks? 
    Oh How Generous of you.  Aren’t you the caring Conservative…..

  • Guest

    Email the editor of PoliceOne.com and ask Doug if he knows the difference between a scientific poll and a survey of like-thinking people.

    doug.wyllie@policeone.com

  • Anonymous

    Obama doesn’t care.  It is not about reducing violent crime – the opposite is what will happen.  It is all about “people” control.  Obama cannot have an armed public when he puts his overthrow of this system of government into full swing. End of story.

    • Guest

      You are now invited to pull your head out of your rectum. It’s amazing how dumb Beck’s followers come across, and you, bullalo, are no exception.

      State these things out loud in your village, so people know who the village idiot is.

  • Anonymous

    to groomer:  Please cite one example of where gun control has worked.  Chicago?  Washington DC?, the U.K.?  how about Australia?  A resounding “no” to all of the aforementioned.  The opposite was the case…all had violent crime escalate exponentially.  On second thought, just forget it…I don’t “Argue With Idiots.”  Get it?”

    • Guest

      Gun violence is very low in the U.K., 0.04. In Australia it’s 0.09. The U.S. has a gun homicide death rate of 3.2. 

      The opposite is NOT the case. Where do you get your misinformation? Glenn Beck? World Net Daily? The NRA?

      BTW, arguing with idiots has been thoroughly debunked; but facts and stats don’t matter to someone who wants reality to conform to his beliefs.

  • Anonymous

    I cannot believe the dems proposal for back round checks, What a bunch of uninformed fools.

    1) a back round check is performed at all gun shows, the dealer calls the ATF and gets approval.

    2) if you  purchase a gun on the internet you take all the risk, You pay first… then you must have the gun sent to a FFL( lic,dealer ) He then performs a back round check for a fee ($30-$50.) if cleared then you get the weapon you previously paid the web gun dealer for.

    3) personal sales from one private person to another is not under the authority of the gun show…

    Also the ATF puts on additional help when a gun show is expected in a defined area,
    As far as rejections more then 85% are overturned in 24hours due to errors. and 10% overturned on appeal. so only 5% yes 5% our rejected,(source  ATF)

    How can we have a fair debate? when the other side does not even know the facts,, And congress is not forthcoming passing a law that already on the books.

    We must not give a inch.!!!! until we can be sure that our government is working with us in good faith and honestly.  We are in serious fight for our rights and a dangerous time as forces work to destroy our system of government…

  • Anonymous

    Hey Gadamer, how’s that “Hopey Changey” thing working out for you?  Do you like paying on the average an extra $2,400 per year for gas under Obama?  You have a short memory..gas was $1.87 per gallon when Odumbo took over.  Do you like 15% G6 unemployment?  Do you like the nation’s first credit downgrade?  Do you like groceries going up by 46%?  Do you like our country having the highest long term unemployment rate since the Great Depression?  Do you like one in six Americans being on food stamps?  Do you like one in four children living in poverty?  Do you like having the abysmal Obamacare rammed down our throats even though the vast majority of America (lots of Dems too) was against it?  Do you like Obama paying $1,000,000 per job in creating temporary “green jobs?” – example: Seattle’s home insulation debacle.    Do you like Obama giving $1.6 Billion (which we don’t have) to our enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood?  Do you like Obama giving 200+ Sherman tanks to our enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood?  Do you like Obama giving 20 F-16 fighter jets to our enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood?  Do you like having a traitor for President?  Do you like Obama being behind “Fast and Furious” which ki!!ed an ATF agent and over 150 Mexicans?  Do you like having an “Accessory to Murder” as President?  Do you like Obama squandering $5 Trillion of our tax dollars in the first 4 years?  Do you like having a President who doesn’t respond to an Ambassador who asks for more protection, then is ki!!ed for lack of protection?  Do you like a President who “hides” survivors of Benghazi-gate?  Do you like Obama granting in-state tuition to illegals wherever they go to college vs. American kids having to pay out-state tuition?  Do you like paying $150-$300 BILLION of our taxpayer money for “entitlements” to illegal entrants to this country?  One would have thought that a “lawyer” would know the definition of “illegal.” Do you like having a President who had his law license pulled for lying to the State Bar?  Do you like having a First Lady who had her law license pulled for stealing money? 

    • Guest

      “gas was $1.87 per gallon when Odumbo took over.”

      Yes, we were in the bottom of the Great Recession. I guess facts in context do not matter much to you, do they? I doubt it if you believe anything Beck states.

      Where do you get the rest of your misinformation? Fox propaganda channel? World Net Daily? Or worse? Glenn Beck?

      I think Obama should be impeached, but you completely IGNORE what he’s done to deserve it. No one will ever accuse Beck’s supporters of being well informed, but man, do you ever know a lot about the lies that are told about the Obamas.

      I’m guessing that you liked Bush’s dumb and illegal war in Iraq. That Bush let bin Laden slip away when we had him cornered. 

      You think Bush didn’t pay taxpayer money for….

      Nevermind: I’m not going to argue with a misinformed, gullible idiot.

      Try reading NEWS sources, and skip the far-right propaganda that makes you come across like a nut case.

    • Anonymous

      I had to look up your last claim. It is completely false!

      http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/lawlicenses.asp

      Man, you reactionaries will believe any lie to rationalize your hatred, won’t you?

  • Anonymous

    The reality is that people who really protect the citizens, (law enforcement,) know we have the right to defend ourselves, they can’t be everywhere to defend people immediately.  Those who want to undermine your protection and security want to disarm us.  Australia recent warned the United States of this. 

    • Anonymous

      Australia has a much, much lower homicide rate than the US. Where do you get your misinformation?

      No one is trying to “disarm” you. NO ONE! Beck exploits the fearful and paranoid. He is brilliant at separating rubes from their money.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4HAW7OERGSC7VZM72V7IGDJ3B4 Sharmane

         Governments have murdered millions, including children, after first disarming the unsuspecting citizens.  Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Lenin, Pol Pot come readily to mind.  Think it can’t happen here?   Think again.

        • Anonymous

          Many, many more governments have NOT murdered ANYONE, even when their citizens were disarmed.

          Are you really naive enough to think that having some rifles will stop the US gov’t from wiping you out with drone fired missiles, cannons, artillery and bombs if they decided to end the American experiment in democracy? 

          Really?

  • Anonymous

    It seems we have some low-information people in the discussion…he/she claims the U.K. has a low gun violence.  He/she has been listening to the moron Piers Morgan.  Here are the facts:

    “The Government’s latest crime figures were condemned as “truly terrible”
    by the Tories today as it emerged that gun crime in England and Wales
    soared by 35% last year.”

    Criminals used handguns in 46% more offences, Home Office statistics revealed.

    Firearms were used in 9,974 recorded crimes in the UK in the 12 months to last April, up from 7,362.

    It was the fourth consecutive year in the UK to see a rise and there were more
    than 2,200 more gun crimes last year than the previous peak in 1993.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephen-H-Polson/1359382777 Stephen H. Polson

    They get confused by facts.  Like McCain who can’t understand?  

  • Anonymous

    More on the lies being spread by Obama, Feinstein, Cuomo, and ilk – President Obama, New York Gov. Cuomo, Chicago Mayor Emanuel, Diane Feinstein, and Senate Democrats don’t want the truth about tougher gun laws to come out. Thanks to a video documenting what happened in
    Australia.  The American people now have the ability to see what happens
    when law-abiding citizens lose their ability to defend themselves. here is the Truth about Australia:

    After Australia’s gun ban took effect, armed robberies jumped 69%.
    Assaults with guns jumped 28%. Gun murders jumped 19%. Most alarming is
    something that wasn’t expected. Home invasions jumped 21%.

    Since the Obama-protective Pravda mainstream media never reports the truth, the lies are accepted by the sheeple Dems. They will follow the Svengali Obama right over the cliff.

  • Snorri

    Gun Control is about weapons control and the management of citizens in an orderly, regulated and standardized way. I.E.: a Human Ant Hill.

  • mike

    today the 2nd .   tomorrow the first…..keep letting the corrupt get away with it and see how you  like America when their through.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lou.weisenbacheriii Lou Weisenbacher III

    Get ready to take your country back from these thugs. Resist we will try them all for treason MOLON LABE    

    • Guest

      Promoting sedition, are you? That’s not allowed even under the 1st Amendment.

      If anyone is promoting treason, Lou; it’s YOU!

      Don’t like the laws? Work for a reactionary candidate, who thinks like you, in the next election cycle.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Shane-Branning/100000402966734 Shane Branning

    NitWit replys to you and ignores SoThere.
    Gotta love a pick and choose LibWit.
    Whata DipShit

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jerry-Smith/100000454083900 Jerry Smith

    Liberals never let the facts get in the way of their agenda – remove God from the public square, take away our guns, tax us to death, murder babies and ration our health care – what a fine bunch. Too bad so damn many of us have been sitting on our rear ends all these years not doing anything about it and that includes our illustrious members of Congress right up to the present.

    • Anonymous

      Here’s some facts that you seem oblivious to:

      U.S. is one of least taxed, developed nations on Earth.

      God is everywhere. He cannot be banned. Want to pray in a public square? Knock yourself out.

      Want more health care? Buy supplemental insurance.  “Afflack!”

      And to the point here: NO ONE, I MEAN NO ONE IS EVEN TALKING ABOUT TAKING AWAY YOUR GUNS (unless you’re a felon or mentally unstable). Well, your guns might be taken away, but no one who’s sane will lose their guns.

      Reactionaries NEVER let the facts get noticed or discussed: you folks live in your own, alternative world.

  • Anonymous

    Liberals are your answer to what the government is all about today…not by the people and for the people, but power and ideology of progressivism, aka communism! Liberals’ ideology: what do people know or say? We are the educated elites who know what’s good for America!

    • Anonymous

      No one is stopping you from getting an education. 

      • Anonymous

        It wouldn’t help. He clearly thinks that he’s being “educated” by Mr. Beck.

  • Anonymous

    What I found most interesting about the survey, is that only 1.5% of police officers thought schools should be gun free zones. 76% thought teachers who went through training should carry guns.

  • Anonymous

    The criminals don’t like to think about gun totting grammas protecting their homes. All the most dangerous places seem to be those that don’t allow guns to be carried by law abiding citizens. Only the criminals get to be armed. Maybe the police would like someone to be on their side in a conflict.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4HAW7OERGSC7VZM72V7IGDJ3B4 Sharmane

    My dearly departed Grandmother who lived in a rural area alone, down the road from one of the family farms, stated the following in 1986:  “No one ever bothers around here.  If I hear a noise, I just raise the window and shoot.”  No one in my family ever harmed anyone, the family was well respected in the community, but would-be perps knew the score.  Now we let career criminals out of jail early to prey on the law-abiding, and our government wants to disarm us.  Doesn’t sound logical to me.  The criminals will always obtain weapons of some kind and do not obey laws.  

  • http://twitter.com/kennywindham kenny windham

    The next thing to kill people are electric cars, because they are so quite. So lets get a jump on this upcoming obama problem and banned this cars along with all the other cars and knives, ball bats and obama the number 1 killer of people.

    • Anonymous

      Too bad we can’t ban stupid ideas.

      • greywolfrs

        Yeah, it is too bad, then you would be locked up some place.

  • wcsmithiii

    I say again:  It is NOT about gun control, it is about PEOPLE CONTROL.  Wake up America…..You are being Had.

    • Anonymous

      WRONG! We have an epidemic of gun violence in the U.S. This is about gun safety. This is about saving lives. Your paranoia smacks of mental illness (or you listen to idiots like Jones and liars like Beck). 

      Which is it? Are you gullible or paranoid?

  • Anonymous

    Pretty amazing results! I bet the pro-control proponents never acknowledge this poll! 

    • Guest

      Nobody with a lick of intelligence will because it’s not a poll; it’s a survey of like-minded cops. It has no meaning except to reactionary propagandists like Beck and his gullible followers.

  • Guest

    This is a survey, not a poll and not scientific. Scientific polls indicate that about 90% of the public want universal background checks, 55% of the people want an assault weapons ban and about 52% of Americans want a ban on large capacity magazines.

    The Court, in Heller v DC, ruled that legislatures could regulate “dangerous and unusual” weapons, so they will have to rule on whether these weapons designed to kill as many people as quickly as possible are sufficiently dangerous or not.

    The current Court is almost as reactionary as Glenn Beck and Alex Jones, so they will probably decide for the gun manufacturers and against the people who will be slaughtered because they refuse to protect public safety.

    I hope I’m wrong, and they surprise me.

  • wcsmithiii

    It is not just GUN violence.  There is violence in this country brought on by the the fact that our culture is fascinated with violence.  We see it every where, movies, TV, Games, but, nobody feels it.  The “bad guy” shoots/slices/beats up another individual but, nobody feels the pain of the other individual so, in their mind everything is still  okay.  The gun/knife/bludgeon can feel no pain.  When tie individual feels no pain then there is no harm done, in his mind.  The problem is not the instrument it IS the individual.  Who is “Jones” you speak of?   

    • Anonymous

      Games and TV shows and movies do not cause violence. If there is violence in this country, and we can’t stop it, doesn’t it make sense to try to keep the violence and damage to a minimum?

      • Anonymous

        You’ve got Beck’s supporters confused with people who give a s$%t about other people. No faction of Americans are more indifferent to lost lives, even children, than Glenn Beck’s faction of narcissists.

  • Guest

    Foreign Policy’s David Rothkopf compared the threat posed to the U.S. by “Americans with guns” versus that posed by North Korea. The former, he asserted, is “immeasurably” greater.

    How many American children has N. Korea killed? Zero!
    How many American children do guns kill every day?  ~six!

    3,300+ Americans murdered with guns since Sandy Hook.

  • Anonymous

    The headline, like everything that comes out of Beck’s mouth, is a total lie. This was a self-selected internet survey. It tells nothing about “most law enforcement officers”. It just tells about the people who chose to go to the website and vote.
    It’s like going to a Grateful Dead concert, taking a poll about who is the best rock band ever, and thinking that you’ve proven that most people think the Dead is the best.

    • Anonymous

      BINGO! That’s is what I mean when I keep writing that this is not a poll and not scientific. Beck’s gullible followers can’t grasp this simple fact, and instead continue spouting nonsense and paranoid ideas.

      The survey is like asking Beck’s followers if Obama is a bad president, the worst president or a complete traitor and thinking that the results mean something.

      There’s a sucker born every minute, and like sperm to an egg, they sliver their way to Beck’s website.

  • Anonymous

    85% of gun owners support universal background checks. Beck’s listeners are the crazy extreme fringe.

  • wcsmithiii

    Knowitsome, I agree they do not cause violence. But, I do not understand how you plan to minimize the damage.

    • Anonymous

      Universal background checks (for all sales). Licensing, testing, and registration. Limits on certain models, limits on large-capacity clips. Some basic ideas that the vast majority of gun owners and other Americans agree with. If it keeps a few guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have it, it’ll save lives. That knife attack the other day shows that while attacks will still happen, the damage will be far less if they don’t have a gun. 
      Regulate them like cars. That’s all. No one is trying to take guns away from law-abiding citizens. Just some common sense regulation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/deuce.bigelow1 Deuce Bigelow

    Just look at Australia and England when they took away guns from the populace.  Violent crime and physical attacks went WAY up… and stayed there.

    • Anonymous

      Total lie. There has not been an assault weapon attack in Australia since they banned assault weapons.

      • Guest

        Dude, facts don’t matter to Beck’s supporters! Do you really think that if facts mattered, they would be supporters of a known, provable liar like Beck?

        • greywolfrs

          Both of you are complete idiots, you can’t just go buy an “assault weapon.” A semi-automatic rifle is a semi-automatic rifle, no matter what it looks like. I can’t tell which one of you is more stupid, Knowsnothing or vicki tiffany.

          • Anonymous

            Let me get this straight: you call a man “vicki,” proving to the most casual observer that you’re akin to a pissed off 10 yr/old, and through that level of immaturity, you have the gall to insult people who are more mature, better informed and far brighter than you are!

            Hey dillweed, every assault weapons ban spells out exactly what brand and model of semi-automatic rifle that should no longer be sold. Don’t lecture me, you arrogant, tiny man.

            I can’t buy an assault rifle because I live in a state that has legislated gun safety. I don’t want to buy an assault rifle because I don’t need to make up for having a small penis.

            Now go stroke your “assault rifle” like a good, little boy.

          • greywolfrs

            Hey stupid, here is the definition of an “assault rifle” straight from the DOD.

            As the United States Defense Department’s Defense Intelligence Agency book Small Arms Identification and Operation Guide explains, “assault rifles” are “short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges.”[21] In other words, assault rifles are battlefield rifles which can fire automatically.[22]

            Weapons capable of fully automatic fire, including assault rifles, have been regulated heavily in the United States since the National Firearms Act of 1934.[23] Taking possession of such weapons requires paying a $200 federal transfer tax and submitting to an FBI background check, including ten-print fingerprints.[24]

            Many civilians have purchased semiautomatic-only rifles that look like military assault rifles. These civilian rifles are, unlike actual assault rifles, incapable of automatic fire.

            Now, you stupid M F er, you could NEVER buy an “assault rifle.”
            Let me get this straight, you think you have a leg to stand on, as you call someone a “tiny man” and “little boy.” So, not only are you a complete moron, you are a hypocrite too.
            I find it funny that you believe vicki is mature, better informed and far brighter. I am sure you believe that because he is a left wing moron, just like you. Unfortunately for both of you, that doesn’t make it true.
            Now, do the whole country a favor and get your whole head in front of the shotgun.

          • Anonymous

            “Now, do the whole country a favor and get your whole head in front of the shotgun.”

            That’s exactly the kind of rhetoric that should push more and more people to oppose you gun nut reactionaries and support common sense gun safety legislation that includes the banning of the assault weapons listed in Sen. Feinstein’s amendment.

            You hateful reactionaries just can’t help but put your foot in your mouths, can you?

            The 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which expired on September 13, 2004, codified the definition of an assault weapon. It defined the rifle type of assault weapon as a semiautomatic firearm with the ability to accept a detachable magazine and two or more of the following:a folding or telescoping stock
            a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon
            a bayonet mount
            a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor
            a grenade launcherThe assault weapons ban did not further restrict weapons capable of fully automatic fire, such as assault rifles and machine guns, which have been continuously and heavily regulated since the National Firearms Act of 1934 was passed.

          • greywolfrs

            Hey stupid, if you had any reading comprehension skills you would know that getting your whole head in front of the shotgun refers to a “self solution.” Moron.
            Secondly, democraps and morons like you think they can change the definition of words to mean what they choose, unfortunately, you do not get to do that. You do realize that a detachable mag means nothing, whether it is 10 rounds or 30. A pistol grip means nothing. AR-15 do not come with bayonet mounts. Show me a an AR-15 that comes with a threated barrel to mount a flash or sound suppressor. Where exactly can one buy a grenade launcher? You can’t.

            First you call someone a man/child, then say I am old and grey? I am neither, in fact, you are older than I, if I am in the way, come over and do something about all of us who are “in the way.” Stop being a coward and do something about it. I dare you.

  • wcsmithiii

    Gadamer_too,  you make no sense.

    • Guest

      What is it that you need to have spelled out in terms that even the most simplistic reactionary can understand? I’m here to help you.

  • Anonymous

    to: Knowsolittle:

    http://www.examiner.com/article/increased-gun-control-lead-to-increased-gun-violence-australia

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-14/australians-own-as-many-guns-as-in-1996/4463150

    Australians now own as many guns – if not more – than prior to the meltdown, so any reduction seen in homicides are more than likely due to the increase in gun ownership.  The mistake many lunatic liberals make is that they include in gun death figures police shootings of criminals and suicides.  If a person is bent on committing suicide, and there is no gun handy, they will find another method. 

    My original question about how the lunatic libs explain the exponential rise in shootings in Chicago and Washington DC after gun control implementation.  They can’t.

    Please don’t reply to my documented attests to the FACT that wherever gun control is implemented, violent crimes increase.  I am through arguing with idiots.  Go read Glenn’s book yourself.  Here is another great example of the lies and hypocrisy of the Dems for you to check out… Obama and Hillary at their finest. 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKdScVerrBU

     

    • Anonymous

      Australia did it right. They didn’t ban guns, they just require registration. So while law abiding citizens can still have them, fewer criminals have them, which is why gun violence is down. BAM you just proved my point.

      • Anonymous

        They banned assault rifles. The new guns are not assault rifles, and there have been no mass murders since.

  • Iseedumbpeople

    I saw a great tee shirt the other day at a gun show.  It said, “Our forefathers would have been shooting by now”.  Damn straight!

    • Guest

      Shooting children in their schools?

      Of course they shot at each other in duels. At least they each had a gun. Apparently, you don’t agree with peaceful conflict resolution. Maybe that’s why the left thinks that the people like you on the right have violent streaks. 

      Our forefathers force blacks into slavery too. Do YOU really want to put their every act on a pedestal?

      I see dumb people too. They leave reactionary comments like yours on Beck’s website.

  • Anonymous

    Universal background checks (for all sales). Licensing, testing, and registration. Limits on certain models, limits on large-capacity clips. Some basic ideas that the vast majority of gun owners and other Americans agree with. If it keeps a few guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have it, it’ll save lives. That knife attack the other day shows that while attacks will still happen, the damage will be far less if they don’t have a gun. 
    Regulate them like cars. That’s all. No one is trying to take guns away from law-abiding citizens. Just some common sense regulation.

    • Anonymous

      From all I can gather you are [in all probability] not a US citizen.

      • Anonymous

        Lol. Don’t give up your day job, Sherlock, I’m a citizen by birth.

        Can’t actually reply to the post, huh?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HSJULSAVFJIJYR6PCTCUPMNXRA Take 2

    It was made very clear in 2008 that Obama was a puppet for a 1960’s era anti-American group that merged or sold out to European Progressive billionaire groups in or about 1972.

    One error by Bush – Cheney and or American lintel regarding weapons of mass destruction – gave this group an opening to reenact the 1930’s Third Reich take over of a REPUBLIC in a financially struggling Germany.  Hence, why Obama et al is spending like MAD men and taking guns away i.e. wanting a fully funded (Infrastructure) Bank e.g. as did Hitler accomplish all the above is now fact about Obama et al

    • Anonymous

      You are seriously insane.

  • scram

    I predict that tyrant hunting will become the new open season with unlimited bag limit if they don’t learn the constitution real soon.

    • Anonymous

      Yawn. More idle threats from trolls.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1264134361 Butch Blosc

    Comrade Obama and the Communist Party just want to disarm Americans.  Period!

    • Guest

      Glenn Beck and you are liars! Obama is NOT a Marxist or Communist! Either you’re an idiot or the boom in the stock market is a figment of everyone’s imagination.  Do you seriously believe that nonsense you spout (you’re an ignorant and gullible fool), or are you just a liar like Beck?

      • greywolfrs

        Hey, it’s vicki tiffany calling someone else a liar. Seems you speak from experience.

        • Guest

          Typical reactionary response: this childish Beckerhead cannot defend Beck because it’s proven that he’s a liar, so instead he attacks the messenger. SOS; DD.

          OldWolf, please keep demonstrating to the world how immature Beck’s followers are. You are what they mean when they say that Beckerheads are not the adults in the room.

          • greywolfrs

            Typical moronic reply, you are a proven liar, but continue to spout your drivel.
            By the way, let’s discuss immaturity. You come here day after day for the sole purpose of slamming Glenn Beck. You have a website dedicated to slamming Glenn Beck. Anyone who disagrees with you is automatically a “Beckerhead.” (real mature name) Then claim that everyone else is not the adult in the room? You are one ignorant M F er.

            Let’s not forget your assumption that I am a “Beckerhead.” Nevermind that I happen to disagree with Glenn on many things. Nevermind that assumption is the mother of all fuck-ups, keep making them, that seems to be working great for you.

            P.S. Continue to be a coward and post as “guest,” punk bitch or should I say vicki tiffany, since they are synonymous.

  • wcsmithiii

    Regulations are in  place, if they are followed and enforced.  The guns did not do the deed,  the individual did.  My opinion , you are entitled to yours.
     

  • Guest
    • greywolfrs

      Please, try it, I dare you.

    • Guest

      Oh look; Grey and in the way wolf is going to pee on someone.

      Apparently, being stuck in the right-wing echo chamber means he does not have a clue that more young people prefer socialism to capitalism (the economy of the rich, by the rich and for the rich.)

      • greywolfrs

        Oh look, it doesn’t matter what you retards prefer. Socialism goes against everything in Constitution, you know, that document that made this country what it is today. If you and they want socialism, feel free to leave, there are plenty of other places where you can have that and they already do. You are one stupid M F er, vicki tiffany.

  • Steve Brody

    Hey, Knowitsome you Moron!  Two places where it’s against the law to carry a firearm.
    Why then in Texas, where an honest, lawbiding citizen can conceal carry, is the stats for gun crimes one of the lowest in the country? Hmmmm?  Because when you take guns out of law biding citizens hands, except for police, only criminals have them. But, what is a criminal to do when they know if they rob a bank or an individual, there is a great chance of being shot?  They go live in a state where they can make a living robbing people & have almost no chance of being shot. Libs seem to want people to be at the mercy of armed criminals, without the “freedom’ of choice to arm or defend themselves or there families.  You Alinsky doctrine progressives are all traitors of the Constitution…

  • Donald Chadd

    It is not just enough for us to know this information we must get to as many people as we can. Be sure and call your cable providers and ask the to carry The Blaze and if they don’t change cable provicers.

    • Guest

      You are a pawn. This is not a scientific poll. Beck sure knows how to fool some of the people all of the time.

      Most people want gun safety laws passed.

  • Anonymous

    Go to Wikipedia ( I know, not the most reliable source, but bear with me) and look up the Gun laws and the history of them in Australia! You will be shocked to learn, the same tactics they used there to disarm Aussies, they are using here to try and disarm us, and why they want to act so quickly in getting these laws enacted!  Prime minister John Howard, who hated guns and said so on Australian TV, used the Port Arthur Massacre just like Obama is using New Town (Ironically, the name of the town in Australia where the massacre occured) to the same ends!  Rebecca Peters, instrumental in disarming Australia, is with the IANSA, the UN group working to get the Arms Trade Treaty ratified and implemented in the USA! She also works for George Soros’ group, Open Society  Institute!  Coincident? I don’t think so! Read up and watch!  Don’t be fooled people, we are being sold a bill of goods by the anti-gunners!

    • Guest

      Keep Googling, Australia has imported and sold about as many guns as were turned in, just not the weapons of mass murder.

      I hope we follow Australia’s example because their gun murder rate is way down, and there have been no mass murders.

      I’m not “anti-gun;” I’m pro living (not slaughtered) children.

      The right to life trumps the right to liberty. The right to not be murdered trumps the right to own any damn weapon that’s available.

  • Geoff Pace

    It is so PAINFULLY obvious where this tact of the feds is taking us. This is not gun control so much as it is people control. The libs are the modern version of the “useless eaters” and “useful idiots” of the Trotsky-Lenin era. They will be among those apprehended when the globalistic corporatists take over – should we allow them to ever get that far.

    Even if passed on the federal level, then by the state level, there are still the County Sheriffs who are the only elected law officials of the counties they preside over who will make the final verdict in their respective counties. PERIOD! In any case, the battle is on for the hearts and minds of the citizens of America. Defend the Constitution well fellow patriots. For it may well be YOUR door they knock on next.

  • Guest

    It is so PAINFULLY obvious where this tact of Glenn Beck is taking us. This is not gun safety so much as it is slaughter freedom. The reactionaries are the modern version of the “useless thinkers” and “useless idiots” of the Beck-Limbaugh era. They will be among those hiding in their underground shelters when we the people rise up to take the country back from the corporate masters who are destroying this Republic – if the reactionaries don’t gun them down in the name of “freedom” first.

    Even if passed on the federal level, then by the state level, there are still corporate masters who are the only un-elected law officials of the regions they dominate and will make the final verdict about who gets to eat, who gets to live and who gets to kill whom. PERIOD! In any case, the struggle is for the farts and numbnuts of America. Defend the Constitution well, fellow patriots. For it may be your butt hole that the corporations aim to penetrate next.

    BTW, this survey is not scientific. The results convey the thinking of cops who decided to take the survey, NOT cops across the U.S.  Beck is a genius at fooling some of the people with bulls$%t surveys all of the time.

    We will not have gun safety measures passed in the U.S. because the gun manufactures (along with their lobbyist, the NRA) do not want reduced sales/reduced profits. In Beck’s USA, it is always profits before people!

    Glenn Beck will ALWAYS put the profits of corporations ahead of the lives of children because he is a corporate shill. That’s his job. When he talks about “freedom,” he’s talking about the freedom of the corporations to run the country, to sell weapons of mass murder to whomever they wish.

  • Anonymous

    The facts speak for themselves, something this admintration has never concerned itself with.