BLOG

44 Percent of College Students Are Wrong About the First Amendment in This Survey

What happened?

A new survey found that a majority of college students agree that it’s OK to disrupt a speaker “by loudly and repeatedly shouting” so they can’t be heard. The researcher conducting the study found this result “highly concerning.” The nationwide survey of college undergrads found that a shocking 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect hate speech.

What’s a constitutional response to speech that’s hateful?

Basically anything except physically shutting it down … e.g., shouting so a speaker can’t be heard or vandalizing property and assaulting people. Peacefully protesting, using your own platform for more speech and ignoring speech you disagree with are all options.

Glenn’s take:

“You might find the speech totally disgusting, totally revolting, absolutely wrong, but hate speech is indeed protected by our Constitution,” Glenn said definitively on Thursday’s “The Glenn Beck Radio Program.”

If you dislike a speaker, you are free simply to avoid them.

“You have the right to not listen to speakers that offend you,” Glenn said.

This article provided courtesy of TheBlaze.

GLENN: Does the First Amendment protect hate speech? That's what US college students were asked last month in a nationwide study to gauge their understanding of the First Amendment. Is hate speech covered? The results are not exactly encouraging. Forty-four percent of college students say, "Nope, it's not." Nearly half. Hate speech is not covered and protected under the First Amendment. Sixteen percent said, "I don't really know."

In hopes that some of these students may be listening, the correct answer is, unfortunately, yes. The First Amendment does protect what society deems hate speech. You might find the speech totally disgusting, totally revolting, absolutely wrong, but hate speech is indeed protected by our Constitution. And if you don't understand why the protection of the worst kind of speech is absolutely vital, then we need a ton of remedial education. And I think we do.

If there is a speaker on campus that students consider offensive, 51 percent said it's okay for the student group to shout over the audience -- shout over the speaker so the audience can't hear him. Fifty-one percent. Even worse, 19 percent of college students said it's okay to use violence to keep a controversial speaker from speaking on campus. Nineteen percent.

This has to have both Antifa and neo-Nazis salivating. Students and Americans, here's another constitutional right you may not know about: You have the right to not listen to speakers that offend you.

This advice is especially handy for Berkeley students, next week during their free speech week, stay home. Read a book. Hang out with friends. Go to a concert. Study at a library. Have your own speech someplace. Whatever.

Just don't cave into the lie that you must physically restrain anyone who offends you.

There is no such thing as a safe zone. If there is a safe zone, then no one is ever safe. Because the minute that 51 percent of society says, "You know what, I don't like your speech, you're not not safe." The study shows that we have out-of-control progressivism. We have out-of-control Marxism. It's easy to mock. It's easy to blame. It's easy to point fingers. But now, what do we do about it? How do you fix such ignorance?

Well, the first thing we do is stop mocking each other. Start trying to find ways to talk to one another, to have actual conversations. And I'm not talking about the 20 percent that are the Nazis on or the Marxist revolutionaries. I'm talking about the 80 percent.

The 80 percent of the American people who don't want to live this way. Who can listen to their neighbor and roll their eyes and be like, okay. We got a crazy neighbor. But they will still help their neighbor. They will still love their neighbor.

The way to do this is we have to make sure our own house is in order first. First of all, parents, you cannot assume that your children are learning the Constitution at school, because they are not.

And if we don't pass the torch on the basic American freedoms in our own, you can be sure most schools and universities are not going to get the job done.

RADIO

Bill O'Reilly: How corrupt media twisted Joe Biden Ukraine scandal onto Trump

Bill O'Reilly gives his take on whether or not President Trump DID promise or threaten the President of Ukraine for dirt on Joe Biden, and whether or not the action is grounds for impeachment. But O'Reilly explains that either way, the media has demonstrated its corruptness yet again by manipulating the story away from a scandal for Joe and Hunter, and towards a potential, rumored wrongdoing by Donald Trump.

RADIO

The Fed, banks printing money to 'prevent' trouble: Recession WILL come soon

Glenn discusses the current state of the economy with author of "Zero Hour," Harry Dent. He says the federal reserve is still funding big banks daily to increase their excess reserve, signaling that something is wrong with the system. Dent says the banks printed money back in the 1930s to climb out of the Great Depression, which only created an aftershock that was even worse. Banks and the Fed are doing the same thing today, so will the coming economic crisis be worse than the 2008 recession? Economist Dent says it's possible, and that it could come as early as 2020.

RADIO

Lessons from Bill and Monica: Trump, Biden, Obama, Ukraine, and corruption

Glenn says there's an important lesson we can all learn looking back on the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky scandal: corruption should matter, no matter which political party is to blame. So why are Democrats and the media trying desperately to shame President Trump for alleged corrupt action, but ignoring Joe Biden's clear intention to help his son, Hunter, profit through foreign policy in the Ukraine? How do we fix such a double standard?