BLOG

YouTube Crackdown Removes Thousands of Videos from Radicalized Cleric

What happened?

After pressure from the government, YouTube has backed down on its stance that the Google-owned company isn’t responsible for user content. The site has removed a trove of videos with talks from Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born Muslim cleric who became radicalized while he lived in London.

How many videos were removed?

Awlaki was put on the terrorist kill list under President Barack Obama and was killed in a drone strike along with three other Al Qaeda members in Yemen in 2011. After his death, his followers celebrated him as a martyr and posted more and more of his videos on YouTube, making him the internet’s top English-language jihadist recruiter.

This fall, the site held more than 70,000 videos with Awlaki’s work; after YouTube’s purge, searching his name only brings up around 18,000 videos, most of which deal with news reports about his death and other tangential material.

Can people simply re-upload them?

In theory, no. YouTube says that human reviewers must flag videos to start the process, but once they’re banned, a digital function will automatically delete more uploads of the same clip.

Glenn’s take:  

It’s great that Google and YouTube are finally taking steps to stop terrorist rhetoric from spreading on the video platform, but they must continue to be held accountable.

“We need to keep an eye on this,” Glenn said.

This article provided courtesy of TheBlaze.

GLENN: Okay. I'm concerned about Google and YouTube because Google is becoming people's news source. They've just hired 1,000 reporters and journalists. And -- and this isn't necessarily good. Because they're starting to control everything.

YouTube is owned by Google. And it really needs to get its priorities straight. And we need to keep an eye on this.

The company is finally taking steps to block the late Anwar al-Awlaki's videos that preach jihad against Americans. They have received complaints from over a decade. But YouTube is taking this major recruitment tool for terrorists and getting rid of it, which is a good thing.

But why are they now doing it? Why now?

Facebook, Twitter, and Google, which is YouTube's parent company, got called into the principal's office last week on Capitol Hill, where they were reprimanded for allowing Russia to exploit their services to mess with the US election.

But the problem of jihadist videos on YouTube has been around for much longer. This jihad propaganda influenced the terrorists who attacked Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, San Bernardino, Orlando, and many of the attacks in Europe.

Six years after al-Awlaki was killed in a US drone strike in Yemen, his videos remained the top English language jihadist recruitment tool. A few weeks ago, a search turned up 70,000 results on YouTube. Seventy thousand videos.

Now, it's only 18,600 videos. And most of them supposedly are just news reports and commentary about him. No longer his rants about killing Americans.

YouTube is using its video finger printing technology to find and block al-Awlaki's videos. This could be a major turning point in policy, because YouTube and other social media companies have usually argued that they're just neutral platforms. And no responsibility at all for what anybody posts.

Well, okay. But are you consistent? For a technology company, YouTube was seriously slow to get to this point.

They made their first public commitment to block videos like al-Awlaki's in 2010. And yet, even his famous 12-minute call to jihad sermon was available on YouTube until 2016.

Now, here's why I say they have to get their priorities right: YouTube restricted several Prager University videos that informed viewers about Islamic extremism, as if they contained controversial views.

Ironically, YouTube is now blocking al-Awlaki's jihadist messages, the very kind of extremism that Prager University's video exposed. It is just another example of how the left trips on its own shoelaces every single day.

RADIO

Jason Whitlock: Raiders coach fired by NFL as a ‘SIGNAL’ to others

Raiders Head Coach Jon Gruden was forced to resign (fired) by the NFL on Monday due to 'misogynistic' and 'homophobic' language found in several of his old, private emails. But Jason Whitlock, sports writer and host of 'Fearless' on BlazeTV, tells Glenn that Gruden's words never should have resulted in his job lost: 'We should have accepted his apology and kept it moving.' But instead, Whitlock says the NFL chose to use Gruden as a 'signal' for all other employees who may oppose the football organization's current, far-left political stances: 'Taking over sports, taking over the NFL, is crucial to the goals of the left and what they're trying to do.'

RADIO

How an ‘orchestrated’ revolution is bringing America TO ITS KNEES

Victor Davis Hanson, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, joins Glenn to discuss his new book, 'The Dying Citizen.' He explains how America's hippies from the 1960s are the progressive elites running our institutions today and how their 'well orchestrated' moves have created a top-down revolution that's 'bringing us down to our knees.' So, what's the solution? Davis Hanson tells Glenn what we can do to push back against the far left today…

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Who Is More Evil: Government or Facebook? | Robby Soave | Ep 120

The Left and Right agree: Social media companies like Facebook are abusing their power — whether through censorship or harmful, groupthink-creating algorithms. But is the solution really more censorship and regulation, like government fearmongers and leftist "whistleblowers" have insisted? Glenn sits down with the senior editor at Reason, Robby Soave, who has a much more refreshing solution laid out in his latest book, "Tech Panic: Why We Shouldn't Fear Facebook and the Future." Politicians have weaponized the fear we have about social media. So, maybe we should be looking at the positives. Glenn and Robby take a look at the (very familiar) history of tech panic and censorship, balance the consequences of changing Section 230, and expose the real threat to the future of free speech: Progressive tyranny entrenched in the old school media.

TV

'HARMFUL CONTENT': How King Biden Is KILLING the Constitution

On "Glenn TV" tonight, Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to reveal how the fundamental transformation of America has already begun by turning the Declaration of Independence upside down.

If Donald Trump was a dictator, then what do we call President Biden? In Biden's first nine months in office, he has already issued 64 executive orders – that's more than Trump, Obama, W. Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Reagan each issued in their entire first years in office.

You never hear the Left talk about the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, or the Bill of Rights any more, unless it's to "reimagine" the Constitution or slap a "harmful content" warning on our founding documents. Seriously. The National Archives said while its website label wasn't targeting the Constitution specifically, "some of the materials presented here may reflect outdated, biased, offensive, and possibly violent views and opinions." The Left finds basic, guaranteed rights so offensive they now spend all of their time on workarounds to deal with America's annoying founding documents.

Watch the full episode of "Glenn TV" below to see Glenn outline the aggressive unconstitutional abuses "King Biden" is jamming down our throats and teaches Americans how we can defend against presidential tyranny.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.