Sabo STRIKES AGAIN: 5 new DEVASTATING pieces from the anti-woke street artist

November 03, 2023

Courtesy of Sabo

WRITER

Last August, the infamous anti-woke guerilla street artist known as Sabo displayed several shocking posters at the American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas, criticizing American Airlines’ controversial woke policies. Glenn has become a fan of Sabo's work, applauding him for his edgy, yet strikingly powerful art, which conveys important messages that not everyone is brave enough to convey in public.

This week, Sabo is BACK, and this time, he hit the streets of Los Angeles, taking aim at Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom, BLM, and more. He gave glennbeck.com exclusive access to his latest installation, which leaves NO ONE from the establishment unscathed.

You can find Sabo's entire collection HERE. In the meantime, here are five of our favorite pieces from Sabo's latest anti-woke art campaign:

"STOP!"

Courtesy of Sabo

A prominent theme in Sabo's work is keeping the establishment accountable by laying their hypocrisy bare for all to see. Sabo's brilliance lies in the fact that he never puts words in the establishment's mouth. He lets their words, actions, and hypocrisy speak for themselves.

This theme is perfectly exemplified in this particular stop sign piece in which Sabo captures one of the more infamous moments when Joe Biden displayed questionable behavior towards minors. Sabo remarked how he had wanted to do a stop sign piece for years because they are, in his words, "so in your face." The perfect opportunity arose when he came across the viral clip of Joe Biden sniffing the hair of the young girl depicted in the poster. He said:

When I saw that particular picture of that girl pulling away from Biden, she was just screaming, 'STOP!' And I knew it was perfect [for the piece].

The media has worked diligently to cover up Biden's questionable behavior with minors. But Sabo isn't giving him a free pass, and he doesn't need to insert his own opinions to do so. He lets Biden's behavior speak for itself.

"Exodus East"

Courtesy of Sabo

The theme of letting the establishment's actions speak for themselves permeates Sabo's "Totem" collection consisting of repurposed street signs. Sabo says this collection represents "the collisions our country has suffered throughout the past couple of years." From the COVID pandemic to January 6, Sabo's stark messaging forces the viewer to recall the hypocrisy and corruption latent in the establishment's responses to these landmark events that shook our nation to its core.

In this particular street sign piece, Sabo wanted to commemorate those affected by Newsom's draconian COVID mandates that left thousands jobless, out of business, and destitute while Newsom himself was dining at the French Laundry with the nation's elite:

I wanted to mount [this piece] in Los Angeles because it basically tells a story of this particular time. COVID, Newsom, and I want to commemorate the people who said, 'I love this state, but I have to go.'

Sabo's stark messaging forces the viewer to recall the hypocrisy and corruption latent in the establishment's responses to these landmark events that shook our nation to its core.

The name of the collection, "Totem," came from Sabo's friend who remarked that the pieces reminded him of the Totem poles from Indigenous tribes. Embedded within the Totem poles themselves are the stories of a people, forcing the viewer to recall significant events in their cultural history as it's passed down from generation to generation. Sabo hopes to achieve the same effect through this collection:

In a graphic sort of way, these pieces are like stained-glass art. People would look at them and tell these stories. God willing 100 years from now, if they still stand, people will be reminded of them.

Sabo's work is for the Americans who are fed up and disillusioned with the lack of accountability towards their government. During the pandemic, Americans were censured for going against the mainstream COVID narrative, forced to choose between complying with draconian mandates and putting food on their table, all the while watching their rulers have their cake and eat it too. Two years after the pandemic, the establishment still hasn't been held responsible—and Sabo won't let us forget, despite the ruling class' best efforts.

"Full Mental Jacka**"

Sabo displays his poster, "Full Metal Jacka**," which is inspired from the movie poster of hte Vietnam War-era film, "Full Metal Jacket."

Courtesy of Sabo

Remember how the Left called Trump a "warmonger" and warned that he would march us toward World War III? Sabo's take on the Vietnam war-era Full Metal Jacket film poster exposes the irony that it is Biden—not Trump—that has brought us to the precipice of a global War. He said:

The thing that Democrats said Trump would get us into, Biden is getting us into. They failed with Afghanistan. There's a war with Ukraine, and we're getting into a war with Russia. And there's China with Taiwan. Now we're here with Israel and Iran. We are headed towards war.

Sabo remarked on the difficulty of preserving his art. Most of his pieces are vandalized on the street or taken down all together, and those pieces that survive are refused by galleries due to their controversial nature. He said:

I hate that art has become so weak that there probably isn't a gallery in this country that would show these pieces of art.

But Sabo also said the struggle behind his work is implicit within the genre itself, that edgy art with controversial messages is often not accepted in its own time. He said:

I think that's what edgy art is really about. At first, it's not accepted. It's shunned. And later on, people will be able to look at it in a different light, and hopefully, that's how it will be with these pieces.

Ironically, several of these pieces from Sabo's collection have been preserved in a museum, but not for the reasons that you would expect. The Smithsonian acquired multiple of Sabo's pieces in their January 6 installment.

"One Bad Dude: Cornpop"

Courtesy of Sabo

This piece is Sabo's ode to young rappers. Sabo is fascinated with the pro-Trump fervor amongst the new up-and-coming generation of rappers, breaking from their Democrat-dominant predecessors. Sabo says:

Young rappers want Trump because they see what Biden and the Democrats have done to their community.

Sabo once again exposes the irony of the establishment's propaganda. Democrats promised to better the lives of minorities, yet it was Trump who ushered in America's greatest economic era to date, including the lowest unemployment rates for both African Americans and Latino Americans.

Sabo once again exposes the irony of the establishment's propaganda.

Younger generations are experiencing the stark contrast between the Trump-era economic boom and Bidenomics. Sabo said young people "can't afford to eat. They can't afford gas. They can't afford rent," things that they didn't experience under the Trump administration.

The establishment is yet again trying to silence Trump ahead of the 2024 election. Amid an onslaught of indictments and legal suits, Trump has proven one thing: he is a fighter. Nothing exemplifies this more than his mugshot which has become an icon of the resistance against the establishment's onslaught of censorship of those who Trump represents: freedom-loving Americans. Sabo said his rendition of Trump's mugshot was "my way of communicating that he's a bit of a hard thug."

"BLM Loves Hamas Paragliders"

Sabo hangs his "BLM Loves Hamas Paraglider" pieces in Downtown LA.

Courtesy of Sabo

Much of Sabo's art has a short shelf life, and not for a lack of relevance or talent. Most of his art pieces are either vandalized or taken down completely within a day of going public. To deter this vandalism, Sabo said he wanted to "come up with a method where people couldn't reach them," and this collection presented the perfect opportunity.

Most of his art pieces are either vandalized or taken down completely within a day of going public.

Sabo created multiple pieces depicting Hamas paragliders, which has become one of the most haunting images to emerge from the October 7th terrorist attacks that killed 1,400 Israeli men, women, and children, the largest attack on the Jewish people since the Holocaust.

This collection calls out BLM's support for the Hamas terrorist, referencing BLM Chicago's tweet in the wake of the attacks that voiced their support for Palestine alongside the same image of the Hamas paragliders. Though they quickly removed the tweet due to backlash, Sabo wouldn't let them get away with it. He said:

I figured the paragliders come from the sky and the air, so it will have the impression of paragliders coming down like they did in Israel. At the same time, I wanted to take a jab at BLM.

Unfortunately, even though the paraglider posters were hung from a telephone wire and streetlights, this didn't deter whoever took them down the next day.

Censorship, spying, lies—The Deep State’s web finally unmasked

Chip Somodevilla / Staff | Getty Images

From surveillance abuse to censorship, the deep state used state power and private institutions to suppress dissent and influence two US elections.

The term “deep state” has long been dismissed as the province of cranks and conspiracists. But the recent declassification of two critical documents — the Durham annex, released by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and a report publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard — has rendered further denial untenable.

These documents lay bare the structure and function of a bureaucratic, semi-autonomous network of agencies, contractors, nonprofits, and media entities that together constitute a parallel government operating alongside — and at times in opposition to — the duly elected one.

The ‘deep state’ is a self-reinforcing institutional machine — a decentralized, global bureaucracy whose members share ideological alignment.

The disclosures do not merely recount past abuses; they offer a schematic of how modern influence operations are conceived, coordinated, and deployed across domestic and international domains.

What they reveal is not a rogue element operating in secret, but a systematized apparatus capable of shaping elections, suppressing dissent, and laundering narratives through a transnational network of intelligence, academia, media, and philanthropic institutions.

Narrative engineering from the top

According to Gabbard’s report, a pivotal moment occurred on December 9, 2016, when the Obama White House convened its national security leadership in the Situation Room. Attendees included CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Secretary of State John Kerry, and others.

During this meeting, the consensus view up to that point — that Russia had not manipulated the election outcome — was subordinated to new instructions.

The record states plainly: The intelligence community was directed to prepare an assessment “per the President’s request” that would frame Russia as the aggressor and then-presidential candidate Donald Trump as its preferred candidate. Notably absent was any claim that new intelligence had emerged. The motivation was political, not evidentiary.

This maneuver became the foundation for the now-discredited 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference. From that point on, U.S. intelligence agencies became not neutral evaluators of fact but active participants in constructing a public narrative designed to delegitimize the incoming administration.

Institutional and media coordination

The ODNI report and the Durham annex jointly describe a feedback loop in which intelligence is laundered through think tanks and nongovernmental organizations, then cited by media outlets as “independent verification.” At the center of this loop are agencies like the CIA, FBI, and ODNI; law firms such as Perkins Coie; and NGOs such as the Open Society Foundations.

According to the Durham annex, think tanks including the Atlantic Council, the Carnegie Endowment, and the Center for a New American Security were allegedly informed of Clinton’s 2016 plan to link Trump to Russia. These institutions, operating under the veneer of academic independence, helped diffuse the narrative into public discourse.

Media coordination was not incidental. On the very day of the aforementioned White House meeting, the Washington Post published a front-page article headlined “Obama Orders Review of Russian Hacking During Presidential Campaign” — a story that mirrored the internal shift in official narrative. The article marked the beginning of a coordinated media campaign that would amplify the Trump-Russia collusion narrative throughout the transition period.

Surveillance and suppression

Surveillance, once limited to foreign intelligence operations, was turned inward through the abuse of FISA warrants. The Steele dossier — funded by the Clinton campaign via Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS — served as the basis for wiretaps on Trump affiliates, despite being unverified and partially discredited. The FBI even altered emails to facilitate the warrants.

ROBYN BECK / Contributor | Getty Images

This capacity for internal subversion reappeared in 2020, when 51 former intelligence officials signed a letter labeling the Hunter Biden laptop story as “Russian disinformation.” According to polling, 79% of Americans believed truthful coverage of the laptop could have altered the election. The suppression of that story — now confirmed as authentic — was election interference, pure and simple.

A machine, not a ‘conspiracy theory’

The deep state is a self-reinforcing institutional machine — a decentralized, global bureaucracy whose members share ideological alignment and strategic goals.

Each node — law firms, think tanks, newsrooms, federal agencies — operates with plausible deniability. But taken together, they form a matrix of influence capable of undermining electoral legitimacy and redirecting national policy without democratic input.

The ODNI report and the Durham annex mark the first crack in the firewall shielding this machine. They expose more than a political scandal buried in the past. They lay bare a living system of elite coordination — one that demands exposure, confrontation, and ultimately dismantling.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Trump's proposal explained: Ukraine's path to peace without NATO expansion

ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / Contributor | Getty Images

Strategic compromise, not absolute victory, often ensures lasting stability.

When has any country been asked to give up land it won in a war? Even if a nation is at fault, the punishment must be measured.

After World War I, Germany, the main aggressor, faced harsh penalties under the Treaty of Versailles. Germans resented the restrictions, and that resentment fueled the rise of Adolf Hitler, ultimately leading to World War II. History teaches that justice for transgressions must avoid creating conditions for future conflict.

Ukraine and Russia must choose to either continue the cycle of bloodshed or make difficult compromises in pursuit of survival and stability.

Russia and Ukraine now stand at a similar crossroads. They can cling to disputed land and prolong a devastating war, or they can make concessions that might secure a lasting peace. The stakes could not be higher: Tens of thousands die each month, and the choice between endless bloodshed and negotiated stability hinges on each side’s willingness to yield.

History offers a guide. In 1967, Israel faced annihilation. Surrounded by hostile armies, the nation fought back and seized large swaths of territory from Jordan, Egypt, and Syria. Yet Israel did not seek an empire. It held only the buffer zones needed for survival and returned most of the land. Security and peace, not conquest, drove its decisions.

Peace requires concessions

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says both Russia and Ukraine will need to “get something” from a peace deal. He’s right. Israel proved that survival outweighs pride. By giving up land in exchange for recognition and an end to hostilities, it stopped the cycle of war. Egypt and Israel have not fought in more than 50 years.

Russia and Ukraine now press opposing security demands. Moscow wants a buffer to block NATO. Kyiv, scarred by invasion, seeks NATO membership — a pledge that any attack would trigger collective defense by the United States and Europe.

President Donald Trump and his allies have floated a middle path: an Article 5-style guarantee without full NATO membership. Article 5, the core of NATO’s charter, declares that an attack on one is an attack on all. For Ukraine, such a pledge would act as a powerful deterrent. For Russia, it might be more palatable than NATO expansion to its border

Andrew Harnik / Staff | Getty Images

Peace requires concessions. The human cost is staggering: U.S. estimates indicate 20,000 Russian soldiers died in a single month — nearly half the total U.S. casualties in Vietnam — and the toll on Ukrainians is also severe. To stop this bloodshed, both sides need to recognize reality on the ground, make difficult choices, and anchor negotiations in security and peace rather than pride.

Peace or bloodshed?

Both Russia and Ukraine claim deep historical grievances. Ukraine arguably has a stronger claim of injustice. But the question is not whose parchment is older or whose deed is more valid. The question is whether either side is willing to trade some land for the lives of thousands of innocent people. True security, not historical vindication, must guide the path forward.

History shows that punitive measures or rigid insistence on territorial claims can perpetuate cycles of war. Germany’s punishment after World War I contributed directly to World War II. By contrast, Israel’s willingness to cede land for security and recognition created enduring peace. Ukraine and Russia now face the same choice: Continue the cycle of bloodshed or make difficult compromises in pursuit of survival and stability.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

The loneliness epidemic: Are machines replacing human connection?

NurPhoto / Contributor | Getty Images

Seniors, children, and the isolated increasingly rely on machines for conversation, risking real relationships and the emotional depth that only humans provide.

Jill Smola is 75 years old. She’s a retiree from Orlando, Florida, and she spent her life caring for the elderly. She played games, assembled puzzles, and offered company to those who otherwise would have sat alone.

Now, she sits alone herself. Her husband has died. She has a lung condition. She can’t drive. She can’t leave her home. Weeks can pass without human interaction.

Loneliness is an epidemic. And AI will not fix it. It will only dull the edges and make a diminished life tolerable.

But CBS News reports that she has a new companion. And she likes this companion more than her own daughter.

The companion? Artificial intelligence.

She spends five hours a day talking to her AI friend. They play games, do trivia, and just talk. She says she even prefers it to real people.

My first thought was simple: Stop this. We are losing our humanity.

But as I sat with the story, I realized something uncomfortable. Maybe we’ve already lost some of our humanity — not to AI, but to ourselves.

Outsourcing presence

How often do we know the right thing to do yet fail to act? We know we should visit the lonely. We know we should sit with someone in pain. We know what Jesus would do: Notice the forgotten, touch the untouchable, offer time and attention without outsourcing compassion.

Yet how often do we just … talk about it? On the radio, online, in lectures, in posts. We pontificate, and then we retreat.

I asked myself: What am I actually doing to close the distance between knowing and doing?

Human connection is messy. It’s inconvenient. It takes patience, humility, and endurance. AI doesn’t challenge you. It doesn’t interrupt your day. It doesn’t ask anything of you. Real people do. Real people make us confront our pride, our discomfort, our loneliness.

We’ve built an economy of convenience. We can have groceries delivered, movies streamed, answers instantly. But friendships — real relationships — are slow, inefficient, unpredictable. They happen in the blank spaces of life that we’ve been trained to ignore.

And now we’re replacing that inefficiency with machines.

AI provides comfort without challenge. It eliminates the risk of real intimacy. It’s an elegant coping mechanism for loneliness, but a poor substitute for life. If we’re not careful, the lonely won’t just be alone — they’ll be alone with an anesthetic, a shadow that never asks for anything, never interrupts, never makes them grow.

Reclaiming our humanity

We need to reclaim our humanity. Presence matters. Not theory. Not outrage. Action.

It starts small. Pull up a chair for someone who eats alone. Call a neighbor you haven’t spoken to in months. Visit a nursing home once a month — then once a week. Ask their names, hear their stories. Teach your children how to be present, to sit with someone in grief, without rushing to fix it.

Turn phones off at dinner. Make Sunday afternoons human time. Listen. Ask questions. Don’t post about it afterward. Make the act itself sacred.

Humility is central. We prefer machines because we can control them. Real people are inconvenient. They interrupt our narratives. They demand patience, forgiveness, and endurance. They make us confront ourselves.

A friend will challenge your self-image. A chatbot won’t.

Our homes are quieter. Our streets are emptier. Loneliness is an epidemic. And AI will not fix it. It will only dull the edges and make a diminished life tolerable.

Before we worry about how AI will reshape humanity, we must first practice humanity. It can start with 15 minutes a day of undivided attention, presence, and listening.

Change usually comes when pain finally wins. Let’s not wait for that. Let’s start now. Because real connection restores faster than any machine ever will.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Exposed: The radical Left's bloody rampage against America

Spencer Platt / Staff | Getty Images

For years, the media warned of right-wing terror. But the bullets, bombs, and body bags are piling up on the left — with support from Democrat leaders and voters.

For decades, the media and federal agencies have warned Americans that the greatest threat to our homeland is the political right — gun-owning veterans, conservative Christians, anyone who ever voted for President Donald Trump. President Joe Biden once declared that white supremacy is “the single most dangerous terrorist threat” in the nation.

Since Trump’s re-election, the rhetoric has only escalated. Outlets like the Washington Post and the Guardian warned that his second term would trigger a wave of far-right violence.

As Democrats bleed working-class voters and lose control of their base, they’re not moderating. They’re radicalizing.

They were wrong.

The real domestic threat isn’t coming from MAGA grandmas or rifle-toting red-staters. It’s coming from the radical left — the anarchists, the Marxists, the pro-Palestinian militants, and the anti-American agitators who have declared war on law enforcement, elected officials, and civil society.

Willful blindness

On July 4, a group of black-clad terrorists ambushed an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention center in Alvarado, Texas. They hurled fireworks at the building, spray-painted graffiti, and then opened fire on responding law enforcement, shooting a local officer in the neck. Journalist Andy Ngo has linked the attackers to an Antifa cell in the Dallas area.

Authorities have so far charged 14 people in the plot and recovered AR-style rifles, body armor, Kevlar vests, helmets, tactical gloves, and radios. According to the Department of Justice, this was a “planned ambush with intent to kill.”

And it wasn’t an isolated incident. It’s part of a growing pattern of continuous violent left-wing incidents since December last year.

Monthly attacks

Most notably, in December 2024, 26-year-old Luigi Mangione allegedly gunned down UnitedHealth Group CEO Brian Thompson in Manhattan. Mangione reportedly left a manifesto raging against the American health care system and was glorified by some on social media as a kind of modern Robin Hood.

One Emerson College poll found that 41% of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 said the murder was “acceptable” or “somewhat acceptable.”

The next month, a man carrying Molotov cocktails was arrested near the U.S. Capitol. He allegedly planned to assassinate Trump-appointed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and House Speaker Mike Johnson.

In February, the “Tesla Takedown” attacks on Tesla vehicles and dealerships started picking up traction.

In March, a self-described “queer scientist” was arrested after allegedly firebombing the Republican Party headquarters in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Graffiti on the burned building read “ICE = KKK.”

In April, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s (D-Pa.) official residence was firebombed on Passover night. The suspect allegedly set the governor’s mansion on fire because of what Shapiro, who is Jewish, “wants to do to the Palestinian people.”

In May, two young Israeli embassy staffers were shot and killed outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C. Witnesses said the shooter shouted “Free Palestine” as he was being arrested. The suspect told police he acted “for Gaza” and was reportedly linked to the Party for Socialism and Liberation.

In June, an Egyptian national who had entered the U.S. illegally allegedly threw a firebomb at a peaceful pro-Israel rally in Boulder, Colorado. Eight people were hospitalized, and an 82-year-old Holocaust survivor later died from her injuries.

That same month, a pro-Palestinian rioter in New York was arrested for allegedly setting fire to 11 police vehicles. In Los Angeles, anti-ICE rioters smashed cars, set fires, and hurled rocks at law enforcement. House Democrats refused to condemn the violence.

Barbara Davidson / Contributor | Getty Images

In Portland, Oregon, rioters tried to burn down another ICE facility and assaulted police officers before being dispersed with tear gas. Graffiti left behind read: “Kill your masters.”

On July 7, a Michigan man opened fire on a Customs and Border Protection facility in McAllen, Texas, wounding two police officers and an agent. Border agents returned fire, killing the suspect.

Days later in California, ICE officers conducting a raid on an illegal cannabis farm in Ventura County were attacked by left-wing activists. One protester appeared to fire at federal agents.

This is not a series of isolated incidents. It’s a timeline of escalation. Political assassinations, firebombings, arson, ambushes — all carried out in the name of radical leftist ideology.

Democrats are radicalizing

This isn’t just the work of fringe agitators. It’s being enabled — and in many cases encouraged — by elected Democrats.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz routinely calls ICE “Trump’s modern-day Gestapo.” Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass attempted to block an ICE operation in her city. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu compared ICE agents to a neo-Nazi group. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson referred to them as “secret police terrorizing our communities.”

Apparently, other Democratic lawmakers, according to Axios, are privately troubled by their own base. One unnamed House Democrat admitted that supporters were urging members to escalate further: “Some of them have suggested what we really need to do is be willing to get shot.” Others were demanding blood in the streets to get the media’s attention.

A study from Rutgers University and the National Contagion Research Institute found that 55% of Americans who identify as “left of center” believe that murdering Donald Trump would be at least “somewhat justified.”

As Democrats bleed working-class voters and lose control of their base, they’re not moderating. They’re radicalizing. They don’t want the chaos to stop. They want to harness it, normalize it, and weaponize it.

The truth is, this isn’t just about ICE. It’s not even about Trump. It’s about whether a republic can survive when one major party decides that our institutions no longer apply.

Truth still matters. Law and order still matter. And if the left refuses to defend them, then we must be the ones who do.

This article originally appeared on TheBlaze.com.

Glenn's Show Prep

Sabo STRIKES AGAIN: 5 new DEVASTATING pieces from the anti-woke street artist

"STOP!"

"Exodus East"

Sabo's stark messaging forces the viewer to recall the hypocrisy and corruption latent in the establishment's responses to these landmark events that shook our nation to its core.

"Full Mental Jacka**"

"One Bad Dude: Cornpop"

Sabo once again exposes the irony of the establishment's propaganda.

"BLM Loves Hamas Paragliders"

Most of his art pieces are either vandalized or taken down completely within a day of going public.

Censorship, spying, lies—The Deep State’s web finally unmasked

From surveillance abuse to censorship, the deep state used state power and private institutions to suppress dissent and influence two US elections.

Narrative engineering from the top

Institutional and media coordination

Surveillance and suppression

A machine, not a ‘conspiracy theory’

Trump's proposal explained: Ukraine's path to peace without NATO expansion

Strategic compromise, not absolute victory, often ensures lasting stability.

Ukraine and Russia must choose to either continue the cycle of bloodshed or make difficult compromises in pursuit of survival and stability.

Peace requires concessions

Peace or bloodshed?

The loneliness epidemic: Are machines replacing human connection?

Seniors, children, and the isolated increasingly rely on machines for conversation, risking real relationships and the emotional depth that only humans provide.

Loneliness is an epidemic. And AI will not fix it. It will only dull the edges and make a diminished life tolerable.

Outsourcing presence

Reclaiming our humanity

Exposed: The radical Left's bloody rampage against America

For years, the media warned of right-wing terror. But the bullets, bombs, and body bags are piling up on the left — with support from Democrat leaders and voters.

Willful blindness

Monthly attacks

Democrats are radicalizing