“A page of prophetic history turned in May of 1948,” says Max Lucado about living in what he calls “the fourth quarter.” “Wars and rumors of wars,” the encircling of Israel by her enemies, and the way our world seems to have turned upside down may be the “birth pains of the tribulation.” But Max says we have no need to fear, because “if you want to know the end, go to the beginning,” and Max takes Glenn all the way back to the bliss of the Garden of Eden. In a conversation about AI, transgenderism, the startling rate of teen suicide, and the rise of the antichrist, Max manages to focus on the hope of a millennial kingdom where “Satan is bound and Christ is crowned.” Glenn asks Max to convince him of a pre-tribulation rapture and for his best advice for resisting the “mark of the beast.” After discussing the Olympic opening ceremonies, the pair consider the near-assassination of Donald Trump and how God “doesn’t exist to make a big deal about America,” but we do exist to make a big deal about God.
Max Lucado’s End Times Survival Guide | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 228
“He’s killing it”: The truth about Trump’s 2028 power team
Will Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio team up for a 2028 presidential run? Glenn Beck asked them both, separately, and shockingly, they gave him the SAME answer. Glenn reveals what they said, as well as what they said about President Trump...
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Blaze.com has a news story out: J.D. Vance responds to the possibility of a Vance/Rubio presidential ticket. Responds to a --
I -- I love his response. He was speaking on Pod Force One. It's a podcast from the New York Post. And they asked him about, you know, how do you feel about a Vance/Rubio ticket?
And he said, it -- well, you know, we get along really, really well. The reason why we're successful, is because all of us work together really well.
STU: Which is not necessarily the case of the first term. You cannot say that about the people working in the White House.
GLENN: No. And most. Most.
I mean, I was saying this to a friend of mine, we were talking. And he asked me about a Vance/Rubio ticket. And I said, I talked to J.D. Vance and Rubio in the hallways of the White House. Just recently.
And about that. And I said, and they both said exactly the same thing.
Let's get through the next three and a half years. Things could change quickly in the next three and a half years.
STU: It's true.
There is a feeling I think on the right. That there's a lot of exciting things happening. Many of them positive.
GLENN: Three and a half years say long way.
STU: We are a long ways away. We are a long way away from the midterm elections.
I mean, think about this. We are what know.
We are -- to this point, closer to Trump's inauguration, than we are to the midterms.
GLENN: To the midterms.
STU: That seems impossible!
GLENN: I know. Impossible.
STU: In my head. But that's true to this moment.
GLENN: It's true. So it's crazy how much could change in the next four years, let alone the next one year.
STU: Hmm.
GLENN: And things are going really, really well.
STU: That's for us. I know you're moving on to something else. The left hates this more than they've hated anything ever. Every person I've known on the left has been driven completely insane by this.
GLENN: Wait. Wait. By all of this, or by all of the leadership. Of the other side?
I mean, what -- what is really driving them insane
STU: They're totally driven by Trump. I'm not revealing anything new here. I think it's more extreme now, than it was in the first term.
GLENN: It is. But it's not -- they're not driven insane by Donald Trump.
I mean, Donald Trump does -- he does help them along, because he likes toying with them.
STU: Sure. Sure.
GLENN: So that doesn't help.
However, it is -- the response from the media. And the response from the Democrats that have made him into Hitler.
Not Donald Trump.
STU: No. I mean, their analysis of Donald Trump is that he's the worst human being of all time. I think that's helped along by leadership. Helped along by the media.
GLENN: They would elect Pol Pot over Donald Trump.
At this point.
STU: Pol Pot implemented a lot of policies that they liked.
GLENN: That's true. That's true. We should all be against the killing fields. But at this point, I'm not sure they would be against the killing fields.
STU: I don't know if the Hamas wing of the democratic party is against the killing fields.
I'm not sure about that. But I will say, if you look at overall. You look at approval ratings of Donald Trump. They're not at their highest point right now. That's not just Democrats.
That's the entire country.
GLENN: Yeah.
STU: So if that were to continue, if a couple things go wrong, if the economy turns down.
We talked a lot about the economy being at risk, especially outside of the AI bubble.
I was reading something yesterday about, you know, the AI situation. It's funny. It's basically giving us all of these gains. It's almost all AI-related. All these -- we talked to experts about this. It's almost all a bunch of money being passed in between like seven companies.
And at the end of the day, let's just say that were to collapse. It would hurt our economy. And who knows where we would be.
GLENN: Even if it doesn't collapse, think of all the jobs that are probably going to be lost in the next three years. We're starting to see jobs lost because of AI now. It's going to become very, very unpopular.
And AI I think is going to become very, very unpopular. And those who, you know, are using AI. This is getting very dicey for me. I'm starting to regret everything that I've done in the last two years.
But it's going to become very, very unpopular, because it will take jobs. If companies decide to use it as people, and not as a tool for people. But, anyway, let's -- let's move on.
STU: Yeah.
GLENN: The one thing. The one thing that they said, that is the point I wanted to make on this was, and they say it in TheBlaze article.
A lot of the good work we've done is because we do it as an administration, and we're all able to work together. What both of them said to me, on separate occasions, when I said this was, I said to Rubio and to Vance. You are killing it!
You're just killing it right now. And they both said, no, no, no. Both of them separately. No, no, no, no. He's killing it. Pointing to the Oval Office, "He's killing it. We're just following what he is directing us to do."
And I'm like, "Yeah. But you're also doing a very effective job at doing that. I've seen presidents give orders. I saw Donald Trump trying to give orders last time. And it didn't work out well."
And he's like, "No. We're a great, great team."
STU: That's good to hear.
GLENN: Yeah, but what I wanted to say was, I can't think of a time in my lifetime, I mean, I was not around the White House of the Reagan years. So I don't know. But I can't think of a time where I have seen honest credit, given by the top leadership in hallway conversations, to the president.
You know what I mean?
It was -- because it was honest. It was real. It wasn't like, you know. Oh, no.
It's not me. It's him. It was real.
No, no, no. You don't understand. His grand strategy amazing.
And we're just following it.
You know, that told me a lot.
A lot.
And told me a lot about the quality of people around him.
STU: And to be honest about it. It's also the right answer.
You didn't get the sense that they -- they are saying the thing they know is going to keep them in the good graces.
GLENN: No, I didn't. I didn't.
STU: That's good. That's really good.
GLENN: Yeah, I don't think either of those guys would have said -- they would have said thank you. It wasn't like that. It wasn't like that. It was no, no, no, no. You don't understand. He is running the show.
STU: I think the Venezuela boat situation is an interesting highlight of this.
Again, we've talked about all the questions about it. There's some stuff to discuss.
However, like, that is something that is super important, to Marco Rubio. Like, that is -- I would say, central to his -- that entire situation is very central to his belief system.
And his --
GLENN: Yes. Freeing the people of Venezuela.
STU: Really important to him. And the fact that Trump really takes that seriously. And is doing something about it, is really important to Rubio. I think it's --
GLENN: But I don't think -- see, that's the way I think most administrations would look at it, like I want to help Rubio out. I know you're really passionate about this. Let me do this. And I agree with you. But I really think, it's the other way around. I think Donald Trump is like, here's why this is important.
STU: Oh, I think --
GLENN: And it's a little bit with Rubio, what you're dealing with, what you're thinking. Let me show you the grand strategy of how it has to happen. And I think the big, big vision is coming from Donald Trump.
And it accomplishes everything that everybody else is looking to do. But it's much bigger vision.
The big vision is coming from him, I think.
STU: Yeah. I think, the other thing that is very central to Donald Trump belief system. Besides the idea that he doesn't want people coming across the border illegally. He's very against illegal subs. Not just a crime, that is associated with them.
But he's like, obviously, been really hard against that -- his entire life.
GLENN: No. I think -- I mean, I think -- I mean, you wouldn't do this, because of the Constitution.
But I think if he could, I think you would be like, yeah. Drug dealers. Execute.
STU: Well, he's kind of said that. What was the guy in the Philippines?
GLENN: Yeah, kind of like that. Look, he just kills them.
STU: And that's what some of the criticism is over the boats. Right?
Surprised to hear, there's not a lot of great trial attorneys involved in the process, when -- there's not defense being presented when -- when the drone is overhead. They believe these are threats. They believe they have this -- this -- that's going to go through the courts. It's going to be challenged.
GLENN: I know.
STU: And they will have to deal with that. But he is -- he is -- more importantly than stopping those drugs from coming in. Because you see the boats. You're like, well, what could that even do to our country? Swallowed up like -- that wouldn't even get through a Washington, DC, cocktail party, the amount of drugs they could carry on one of those boats.
GLENN: Well, if Hunter.
STU: If Hunter is there obviously.
GLENN: Or somebody else from the Biden administration.
STU: Right. Who knows who it could have been, with all the cocaine in the White House. But, I mean, the point there is, the message.
The message is quite clear what -- what they're sending to -- to Venezuela. Which is not just don't send boats. It is stop everything you're doing. By the way, did you notice that very large ship off your coast?
Like, we are sending all sorts of messages to them.
Much deeper than a please stop delivering some cocaine here.
GLENN: Do you think the fact that we sent one of our biggest bombers from North Dakota to just buzz the coastline. Just in the international waters.
STU: It's a beautiful coastline. Some sightseeing.
GLENN: Did you see this?
Two of our bombers from the air base in North Dakota ran what I would describe as -- and I think they want him to describe it in Venezuela, the same way. As a trial run!
Two times, now, we have sent two bombers. Big bombers. Right to the line of Venezuela. Right to international waters.
They flew all the way down from North Dakota. Down, made that run.
And then headed on home!
He is sending all -- the guy is brilliant.
He is sending all kinds of signals.
You guys should take care of him.
STU: What you know signal he's saying to me?
That he doesn't care about global warming. He see not care about the emissions from that plane.
GLENN: Hold on just a second.
Doesn't that feel good?
Why Trump’s “BAILOUT” of Argentina is actually AMERICA FIRST
Why did President Trump recently do a currency swap with Argentina and make a deal for Argentinian beef imports? Financial expert Carol Roth joins Glenn to explain why she believes these deals are actually America First and in our national security interests. Plus, Carol and Glenn discuss the effects of Trump's tariffs and the government shutdown.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Carol, welcome to the program.
CAROL: Hi, Glenn. How are you?
GLENN: Good. Can you tell me what's going on in Argentina?
First of all, the currency swap. We didn't make a loan to Argentina. We made a currency swap. Which I'm not really -- I'm not really fond of the -- what is it? The piece zero. What is their currency down in Argentina?
CAROL: The Argentinian peso. You don't have a bunch of those in your vault with all your gold and silver?
GLENN: No. No. I don't. I don't.
But we do now, because we currency swapped, right? What's it mean?
CAROL: Yes, so this is -- this is not -- you know, just giving known Argentina for its government to spend. This is a financial support, which, by the way, currency swaps are not something that is unusual.
GLENN: Right.
CAROL: You know, we do this all the time with our allies, with Japan and Canada and what not. What is unusual in this particular situation, is how it's affected.
So basically, what happened is that we gave the Argentinian Central Bank dollars. We took as collateral the peso, and that is meant to support the Argentinian peso and help to stabilize this currency.
GLENN: Right.
CAROL: And a couple of things of note, one is how it was done is interesting. Because normally when we do currency swaps, and we have these lines, it's done through the Federal Reserve, or central bank.
This time, it was not. It was done through the Treasury, through something called the ESF. The Exchange Stabilization Fund, which is sort of a black box fund that allows Treasury to move quickly. You don't need Jay Powell. You don't need the approval of Congress in order to do these things.
GLENN: And that's what it was built for, to stabilize currency in friendly countries?
CAROL: And in the US, by the way,
because I can talk about the history and how we've used it in the US before. But just to kind of get to the Argentinian point. We did this, you know, before the election to help, you know, stabilize things for Milei, so that his government could win.
But we didn't do this because we think Milei is a good guy, or he has fabulous hair, even though we do think that.
The reason we did that is to secure our interests. Because you know who has been making a play in Argentina and throughout Latin America? You know who has had a long-term currency swap with Argentina. It's another country, I'll give you all a hint, and it rhymes with China. China's influence all around the world with their Belt and Road Initiatives where they're trying to dominate traditional infrastructure, digital infrastructure, financial infrastructure, we are trying to kick out their influence. For national security reasons. Also, it just so happens, that Argentina has the second largest reserve of lithium, as well as a smaller set of reserves of other rare-earth elements, that we need access to, for our economic and national security.
So that is what is underpinning all of this. It's because we don't want to be speaking mandarin one day.
GLENN: It's amazing how Donald Trump. People just don't understand this.
Everything he's doing in south marker, he's realigning the globe.
CAROL: Yes.
GLENN: He's doing -- he's doing his own version of America first, Great Reset, and he's just doing it by himself.
I mean, it's pretty incredible, isn't it? Carol?
It really is.
This is why, remember, when we first had the discussion by Scott Bessent.
And I eased everyone ever seen concerns.
Scott Bessent made his fortune on foreign currency exchange. There is nobody who understands the machinations of how you use currency to support countries, and also, you know, the impact on political influence. Like Scott Bessent.
So he has been side by side with President Trump. Who has said, you know. China's influence in South America is a national security issue.
It's a priority.
And, you know, at the time, when we're seeing a reset of the global financial order, and you had China making this very big play. At the same time, when we really have a serious issue with our fiscal foundation. At a minimum, we need to make sure that we have our hemisphere, locked down, before we can do anything else.
And China has really been focused on making inroads in Latin America, and that is what this is all about. And it's not just about the currency swap.
You talked about the importation of Argentina beef. That's a piece of it as well.
And we have to support US ranchers. We have to make it easier for them to do business. We have to remove regulation. This extra piece from Argentina, this is a long-term play. And I know that it's hard for people who are ranchers and who are dealing with this day to day. But this is a long-term play for national security. Because otherwise, it's not going to be Argentinians. It's going to be China that owns everything.
GLENN: Yeah. So I'm looking at Venezuela. What's happening there.
And I don't think that's about drug running. I mean, you know, it is about drug running. But it's not.
It's about, again, taking control of this hemisphere. True or false?
CAROL: Absolutely. And, I mean, this a -- this isn't even you or I guessing about this. This has been a stated goal of the Trump administration.
One of the great things about the Trump administration is Trump, whether he intends to or not. Is incredibly traps parent
He will tell you, what -- he will tell you the things he will do, even if they're couched, you know, in a different record. You can look through that record, and see what that candy is on the inside. And he told us about that candy. So he's been very clear, in addition to the commodities, and the -- the words, the elements, and all these things that are very plentiful in South America. We need to make sure that we have within our allies control so we can have access to.
You do not want China to have military relationships, and other very strong relationships. Within South America.
Because we know what that means long-term for the United States.
GLENN: How is Trump doing overall?
CAROL: So I think overall, I think he's doing quite well. I think from a foreign policy perspective, and I said this during the last administration. Think of him as a business guy. But from a foreign policy perspective, he's an absolutely just killing it. Crushing it. He's been doing a great job in terms of securing the borders. Obviously, we would like to see more deportations. But they're certainly trying and have some roadblocks. And I think from an economic standpoint, the fact that he has this long-term lens, even though some of the machinations I don't agree with, these are the important things. This is finally an administration who says, wait. Our military stockpile is at risk. Because we don't have the components and the supply chain to be able to make products.
We're dependent upon other products in other countries. And assuming they're going to sell us those products, so that we can be able to defend ourselves against them. That doesn't make any sense.
So finally, we have people who are addressing the long-term problems.
And I think the most important thing for a country right now subsidy that we have the runway.
Because we cannot, in three years. Or three and a half years, turn over the reins to another set of people, who want to undo all of this, who hate the United States. Who want to walk that back.
We need people like President Trump. Like the people he's developing. Who understand the long-term issues, that we face that have been built up over many years.
From this broken fiscal foundation. From both parties. But that's where we are today. And he is doing the hard work to try to fix that.
And it's not necessarily apparent to everyone who doesn't understand at this level. But it is so critical, for this very important reset that we're going to have.
GLENN: So I know that you're not a fan of tariffs. I'm not a fan of tariffs.
CAROL: Correct.
GLENN: However, the things that have been happening, the tariffs are not doing what everybody thought they would do.
Why is that?
CAROL: Well, I don't necessarily agree that they're not doing what people thought they would do.
I think that they're -- there has been a bit of overhype on how things are presented.
So do tariffs make it more expensive for businesses and consumers to buy certain goods and services? Yes.
And that has happened. And I've seen it with my own eyes. With my own company. In joy venture partners and small businesses across the country.
There are small businesses that have major burdens. These are the things we thought would happen. And they are happening. In terms of creating runaway inflation, I don't think anybody said that at the levels they are.
They said that when he kicked them up to 100 percent. Which he walked back.
GLENN: Right.
CAROL: But we also know when you look at inflation data. That the way that calculated. There's a lot of picking and choosing and substitutions. So, of course, when you say, oh, well, this particular product is being hit too much.
Some of it is substituted to this. Of course, it's not going to show up in the same way, as it affects people in their day-to-day lives. So, again, I think it's that nuanced understanding.
It's the same thing, you know, when people said, hey, why am I at the grocery store? And everything is 30 percent higher. And they're telling us that inflation under Biden is 4 percent. We know that has to do with the calculation.
So I think that tariffs are causing some issues. And some pain.
And hopefully, that can be sorted out in time.
But, you know, absent that particular strategy, I think other things that he's doing, on the American front, to shore up our security from an economic and national security standpoint, make a lot of sense.
STU: And, Carol, I think a lot of people lose sight. Just because it was such a big issue.
Look, trade is important.
But it's also not a huge part of our economy. Imported good news are about ten percent of our economy.
Does that number sound about right?
CAROL: You know, it's a small percent.
I would want to go back and verify the neighbor.
I have so many things rolling around in my head today. That's not top of mind.
But it's not a meaningful percent of our direct -- where does impact, there's a component, where it flows through the economy. And it affects domestic goods and services.
So even, if, you know, on a headline basis, it doesn't seem like it's that important, it can flow through the rest of the economy and create a drag and create some issues there.
STU: Yes.
GLENN: I want to take a break. And, Carol, I want to come back.
Carol Roth is the economist I trust. She's a former investment banker. And really has a clear eye, on not Wall Street. But on Main Street.
I want to talk to you about the shut down. We're about to see possible delays at our airport. Our air traffic controllers. SNAP is about to expire. What happens here. When his the average person begin to really feel the shutdown. And is there a -- is there a line where it just has gone too far.
GLENN: So, Carol, tell me where we are on the shutdown.
CAROL: Well, it's tough. And I think I've said to you before, Glenn. As somebody who would love to see many parts of the government be shut down permanently. There's part of me that goes, this is fantastic. And I hope it goes on forever.
GLENN: Me too.
CAROL: Obviously, there are people who -- you know, we want to make sure that we get paid. We want to make sure the military get paid. We want to make sure that air traffic controllers get paid. So there's a little bit of give and take. Probably the most surprising thing that has come to light is how many people are on food assistance in this country.
GLENN: Yes.
CAROL: When we have something that's supposed to be a safety net, it's almost in my mind, supposed to be like under the tightrope. The trampoline under the tightrope. You fall, and then it pushes you back up. And it's a temporary solution. I feel like we've turned that net into a hammock, where people are just taking a nap. And sleeping in it long-term. And, you know, that is something that even though devastating for the families who truly need to be on it. The fact that this is getting some light on it, I think, you know, that could be a small silver lining here. And I think that will put pressure on the Democratic base. The Democrats are holding out for a bunch of insanity, for illegals over trying to feed the people who are actually in their base. So I'm hoping that puts enough pressure for everybody else though. I think when this really starts to flow through the economy and becomes a drag on numbers and becomes a drag on the stock market, is where you're going to -- to see a little bit more --
GLENN: Any idea when that happens?
CAROL: It's hard to say. Because as we know right now, with the government shutdown. We're not even getting numbers.
GLENN: Right. Right. Right.
CAROL: But, you know, we cannot afford for GDP to contract. We cannot afford for the consumer, which is 70 percent of the economy.
To feel like they cannot spend. Because that flows through tax receipts. And if we have lower tax receipts. It will blow up the deficit. If we blow up the deficit, we can end up in a debt spiral. So that's the big issue here.
GLENN: Well, the food stamps. If you look the at the SNAP program through ethnicity. 45.6 percent of Afghans who have been imported here in America, are on food stamps. Forty-two percent of the Somali community. Thirty-four percent of the Iraqi community, and 23 percent of the Haitian community. That just can't happen!
That just can't happen.
CAROL: Yeah. You know, in terms of those numbers. I think there's a common sense approach that we need to take here. In terms of immigration.
Which I've raised the question with AI. You know, how much immigration do we actually need?
But to the extent that we do invite great people into our country, who share our values. We need to means test that, and you should not be allowed to come here and then be a dependent on the government.
That should be a position of coming to this country.
And I think that's something that seems like it would maybe a 20 or 90/10 issue. So, again, shining light on these things at the point of people who are actually willing to do the hard work and address this problem, is a net benefit.
Is a silver lining, even though the backdrop. You know, we don't want people who actually need this, to go without food.
But, you know, it brings into question, the system. You can get people beans. You can get people rice. You can get people staples. And have them be well-fed in a fraction of the cost, that it's currently costing. And keep out the dodos and the candies and the people who just arrived here to take advantage of the system.
GLENN: Yeah. Carol, thank you. As always, God bless.
CAROL: Always a pleasure.
GLENN: You bet. Buh-bye. Carol Roth. She is just -- I just love Carol. I looked for somebody like Carol for a long time, that understood Wall Street, understood the banking, and then also understood Main Street. CarolRoth.com.
You can find her at the website. Carol Roth. Or follow her on X @CarolJSRoth.
I have a theory about Trump's nuclear testing…
President Trump recently ordered the Pentagon to resume nuclear testing after Vladimir Putin announced a new underwater nuclear device. Are we heading towards a potential nuclear war, or does Trump have another goal? Glenn Beck explains his theory: Trump just won this fight...
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Well, President Trump said yesterday, truly great meeting with President Xi.
This is a the problem. So much is hyperbole is -- truly. Like everybody said that meeting couldn't happen. It happened. And they said couldn't be done. It was done.
I got up this morning. People said I couldn't open the door, and I opened the door. Okay? It was the greatest door opening I've ever seen.
But from all accounts, this was a really, really good meeting.
Let me just say this: He's getting ready to meet with Putin. And with what Putin has done in the last couple of days, and now everybody is upset.
Oh, my gosh. Donald Trump said he's going to start testing nuclear weapons again!
Yeah. Yeah.
You know why?
Well, China is testing them.
And Russia is testing them.
We've had a moratorium on that. And here's what he's really doing. If I -- if I heard the news. And I was in the Donald Trump White House, I would be -- I would have walked in, after I heard the news, especially yesterday.
That Vladimir Putin has a new nuclear missile, that he can shoot 6,000 miles away.
Underwater. And it can navigate, and then blow up like a hydrogen bomb under the water, just off the coast of California, which would create a radioactive tsunami. This is what I would tell the president. Congratulations, Mr. President. You've won.
Now, why would I say that?
Because Vladimir Putin is not going to do that.
He's not going to do that. It would make him the pariah of the entire world. You're not going to set off a nuclear, radioactive tsunami to cover Los Angeles.
Because here's -- if I'm the president, and maybe this would make me a very bad president. But if I'm the president. And I hear that he has just launched a nuclear missile, towards Los Angeles, my decision is: Do I stop it?
Yes, I do everything I can to try to stop the missile from hitting. Do I respond before it hits?
All unconventional wisdom is, you've got to launch now, Mr. President. You have to launch now!
Hmm. Now, maybe this makes me a very bad president. I don't know.
I think it probably does. But I would say, no.
I'm not launching. Let it hit. And then I'm going to say to the rest of the world, immediately after it hits, this man just bird Los Angeles, killed all of these people, by launching a missile, a hydrogen bomb, underwater. God only knows what it's done to the environment.
But here's what it's done to people. And here's what it's done to Los Angeles. I give the world an hour before I respond.
I don't want a nuclear war. Because we all know what that means.
But rest of the world, you need to condemn him, and he needs to go on trial for crimes against humanity.
Nothing -- nothing warrants that kind of abuse of nuclear weapons.
That's what I would do as the president. Because I know the rest of the world, would not be kind to anyone who launched a nuclear weapon at the West Coast.
Wouldn't. If we launched a nuclear weapon, you know, even if we blew up Israel, with a nuclear weapon, the world would be like, look at what America has just!
They've killed all these Jews. Wait a minute. I'm so confused right now, what I'm for and what I'm against. But they would still condemn it.
Nobody can get away with that. He knows. Putin knows, the president is the most concerned about nuclear weapons. So what does he do?
He describes two nuclear weapons he has.
He's pulling out all -- there's nowhere to go from there. What are you going to do next? I'm going to blow up the moon?
He's just used everything in his bag of tricks. There's no place bigger that he can go. Other than actually launching those things. Mr. President, Congratulations, you've just won. So that's what I think is happening with -- with what Donald Trump has done this week. And the way Putin is now reacting. And he's about to turn his sites on Putin and Ukraine.
So let's start and see what happens.
Decoding the Fed rate cut: What it means for you
The Federal Reserve has cut interest rates for the second time in the 2025 fiscal year. Glenn sifts through all the economic jargon and translates it into plain English to explain what this could mean for the average American.
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Let me talk to you a little bit about the fed rate and what it means. Most people don't spend their evenings reading the Federal Reserve statements. And I don't blame them. Because I don't do it either.
It's like background noise from an alien planet.
The Fed has cut the rate by 25 basis points. I don't even what a basis is or a basis -- what the hell does that even mean? Why should I care about that?
Okay. Let me explain what it is, and why you should care. Because the Federal Reserve -- the quiet, most powerful group in the world has decided to cut rates. And that changes the rules of your financial life. From your mortgage to your job security. From the cost of groceries. To, you know, the health of your savings account.
What they did yesterday is not going to help your savings account. What they did yesterday, will help your job. Okay?
A little bit. Now, think of the Federal Reserve as hmm. I don't know.
The most corrupt bank -- I'm sorry. I mean, the central bank.
Think of it more like the mob that -- think of it like a very credible bank that you don't know who even owns it. Okay?
It is not part of the federal government. It's not a federal agency. That's a really important part. They don't print the money. Not directly. Okay? That's up to the Treasury.
But they control the flow of money, and if the economy slows down, this is what they say they do. Okay?
If the economy slows down or starts to break, the Fed tries to fix it by lowering the Federal Funds Rate.
That's the interest rates that the banks charge each other to borrow money overnight. And when that rate drops, supposedly, borrowing becomes cheaper for you! But does it?
Yes. But it takes time to get to you. When borrowing becomes cheaper, you can start a new business.
You can get a house. You can borrow more money.
And when people borrow more, they spend more. Which in theory, keeps jobs going. People are creating jobs. Businesses start to open up.
Et cetera, et cetera. That's the lever the Fed just pulled again. Twenty-five basis points. That means .25 percent.
It doesn't sound a lot -- like a lot. Especially if your credit card is at 21 percent. Or your car loan is at 8 percent. Or your mortgage is just choking you to death. But it is a small ripple that will go outward. And it may just be the beginning.
So if you own a home, and you have an adjustable mortgage, you'll see a slightly lower rate. Maybe -- maybe you'll save a couple hundred dollars every month. And that's nothing -- you know, that's not nothing. If you have credit card debt -- and this is my favorite part. If you have credit card debt, don't hold your breath. You're not going to see anything. Why?
Oh, because when they're raising the rates. Oh, those banks, they raise it right away. Oh, it costs us so much money to be able to borrow money. And you're going to borrow it from us, so we have to raise that rate right away, because it will cost us money. Once they lower the rate, they're not in any hurry.
They're like, you know what, let's slow down just a little bit. We don't need to lower that interest rate on the credit card, right away.
Remember I said, think of them as a Mafia -- as a really good bank. Okay?
Now, if you're shopping for a car or a small business loan, this could be your window. Because lending is going to get a little bit looser. When the money is flowing a little bit more.
Because the Fed lowers the interest rate. Then the lending gets a little looser. You can buy a car.
If you're retired or you're saving. You know, you have money, you know, in a CD or a savings account, think of this as a move from the Mafia. Your savings account will drop just a little bit. Because your savings. You'll earn less, your CDs, and everything else.
You'll earn less when the interest rates fall. Okay?
So in short, what this means yesterday, is it will help people who are borrowing money. But it will hurt people that are not savers. Now, it's not dramatic. But that's -- you know, going -- interest rate going down hurts people saving money, but helps people borrowing. Interest rates go up, it helps people who save money and hurts the people borrowing money. Okay?
So why is the fed doing this? Well, the president has been saying, can you do this, for quite some time. Because this is what spurs an economy. This is what spurs jobs being created. Because people can borrow money, and they can expand their business.
The reason why they said they did this yesterday is because, quote, the downside risk to employment has risen. What does that mean?
People are losing their jobs. That's what that means. Okay? I don't know why they just can't speak English. You know what, we have to do this because people are losing their jobs. Maybe we need to lower this down, so people can hire some more people. That's what they should say. Inflation, they said, is still somewhat elevated.
Okay. Let me translate again. We don't have -- we don't know our butt from our elbow on what we're doing with inflation.
We're out of magic tricks.
And we still have it tamed inflation. But it's getting better.
Okay. So they're trying to ease the pain of people getting fired or no job creation.
Without setting all of our money on fire.
This is the real trick and the real balance. And when I say setting our money fire. The lower the interest rates. What that means is, they're -- your money will be worth less.
Okay?
But here's the -- here's the bigger move that's buried in the fine print.
They're also stopping the shrinkage of their balance sheet. Love that.
We're just going to stop the shrinkage of our balance sheet.
Okay. What kind magic Fed Viagra are you using here to stop that shrinkage?
What it means is they're done pulling money out of the system. They're going to start adding money back in. More liquidity. More dollars that they throw in, the -- the more fuel.
And it's a soft rolling start from fighting inflation to fighting a slowdown. That's what this is.
Now, here's how it's going to hit you in the real world. If you're living paycheck to paycheck, this might feel like some relief in the short-term. Okay? Maybe your payments start to ease up.
Maybe if you're looking for a car. Maybe you get a little bit more bang for the buck. But this is just a small move in that direction. Maybe credit gets a little more available.
Maybe you can afford a little bit more of a better house.
But here's the hidden cost in the long-term.
Every rate cut makes your dollar worth a little less.
By the way, may I just side note here, Your Honor. I don't know why we accept the Fed saying, "We have a target of 2 percent inflation, every year. Two percent is -- that's our target."
Why shouldn't they be -- why shouldn't they be targeting zero percent inflation? Why do we accept that?
You know what that means? That means 2 percent, two cents on every dollar goes away every year.
I don't know. After ten years, that adds up. Why do we accept that? Because they say it in a way, nobody understands!
And so nobody pays attention. So the prices at the store, they don't fall with things like that. They usually rise.
The assets of the rich, the stock, real estate, they start to inflate again. The working class, once more, will pay for the cure. With the value of their labor. And, but this is how the cycle works. Okay?
When things tighten, the powerful scream louder than the average person, and the Fed listens. They open the money spigot. The markets rally, and the average American gets another inflation hangover at some point. Hopefully, it won't happen, at least right away.
Hopefully, we will balance things out. Because Donald Trump, with what he did in Asia yesterday, there's a huge -- there's a lot of money coming in. And he has reshaped the Western world. This guy is not going to be appreciated for -- if J.D. Vance wins. And just assuming it's going to be J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio as the president.
But if they win, after his first term, and maybe into the second term, if he's given a chance for the second term, that's when you're going to really see everything that Donald Trump is doing right now. You're going to see the effects. And you're going to realize, holy cow. I thought that guy made a huge difference at the time.
Look at what he did. He is a long-time. Long-term player.
He's looking way over the horizon. And this week in Asia was a big, big deal. So let me get back to the Fed rate.
Here's what you need to do. You need to first understand the game. This is not a bailout for you. It's a pressure valve on the system. Okay?
If you have debt, this is a signal, that you can make pay it down fast enough, while the interest rates are starting to ease. Same with our government. Interest rates are going down, don't borrow more money, spend less money. And pay things off faster.
If you have savings, look for hard assets, things that will hold their value. Real estate. Blah, blah.
If you're in business, this might be the window to shore up your position.
Don't overextend yourself. Things are still tenuous. Because this is a pivot.
This is a -- a swingback to cheap money. Hopefully not 0 percent again. But the Fed believes that the storm isn't over. And they're right.
It's not. We're in a very precarious situation between employment and runaway inflation. Now, Javier Milei has tamed this thing. And luckily, Donald Trump and Javier Milei get along, and I hope we take a few more things from Argentina.
But the Fed, almost against their own will, is trying to steer us out of a slowdown. But if we're not careful, it will set us up for another round of inflation. But the pivot point is here from the Fed, and every time they pull that lever, remember, it's -- it's you and your dollar that ends up footing the bill. One paycheck, one grocery bill, one devalued dollar at a time.
But right now, it is important for it to happen, so we balance the losing of jobs, maybe some more job creation is coming our way.
We've lost a lot of jobs just in the last week. Because of AI. And I don't know -- did we talk about this yesterday? I'm not sure we did. This week, there's been two. It's been UPS and Amazon, that have cut, what? About 100,000 jobs between the two of them. That's a lot of jobs.
But notice, it's not the guy on the front line. It's not the guy at the dock. Right now, it seems to be the white-collar worker. So the guy who didn't go to college right now, right now, is more safe than the one who did go to college and is trying to pay off all of that stuff. They're being replaced by AI before the dock worker is.
So if you didn't go to college, now is the time to go, suckers!
Because you don't to have worry about all the things that the people that are still paying for that they can no longer use.





