The left will use THIS as a DISTRACTION to takeover America

The far-left can scream for ‘women’s rights’ all they want, but it’s just a facade. This isn’t about abortion for the far-left, Glenn says. It’s not about a Supreme Court leak, either. This is about creating chaos to enact RADICAL changes and ultimately takeover America. So while the world wonders if the war between Russia and Ukraine will spread, maybe Americans should focus on the philosophical wars we’re already fighting at home: A war against our kids, our schools, our dollar, our economic stability, our property, our freedoms, and our TRUTH.


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I'm speculating that that may be a society -- you know, this -- and it is the response here is, first of all, chaotic.

You know, I said, back when I was on Fox. The key word to really pay attentional to, in the coming times, when this stuff starts to happen, will be chaos.

Chaos. When there is chaos, that is -- we know who the author of chaos is.

And everywhere, you are seeing the seeds of chaos. You're seeing it at the border.

You're seeing it last night. In front of the Supreme Court. This isn't, hey, let's do things the right way. Let's even just wait for an opinion. I would be -- I would be just as angry, at the right, if they had released this opinion.

Now, it may turn out that they did. I highly doubt it. But we don't know who did it.

But this is the way the left works. And this isn't about abortion. That's what is so crazy. They are using women, and abortion. To pack the courts. Get rid of the filibuster. And to take the country over.

STU: They want the whole thing.

GLENN: And they will burn it down, if they don't get it.

STU: I think they believe, there's going to be enough of a reaction to this. They can convince them, that this is the Handmaid's Tale. That they might be able to pull off a bigger power grab. Right? Where they can pack the court. Where they can do all sorts of things, to manipulate our system and our society.

And it's not impossible, they're right on that. Look, abortion, generally speaking is not particularly popular. It's divisive, at the general level. Right?

Where if you say pro-choice. Pro-life. It's just generally a divisive issue. Where partisan rules apply. But the actual -- when you go into it, the actual debate is not really much of a debate.

You know, the Republican position is illegal in most cases. Not -- not for -- there's exceptions for rape and incest. Again, we can get into those things. But that's the Republican position. That's where this battlefield has been drawn for a long time. And the Democratic position, is basically, as we've seen from representative after representative, candidate after candidate, to my recollection, none or maybe only one of the Democratic candidates would actually put a date.

GLENN: I know.

STU: Which was usually a third trimester, to give you just a sense of the polling on this.

The American people do agree, that generally speaking, that there should be abortion available to potential parents. Parents, in the -- to moms. If you can define what a woman is. In the first three months. First trimester. It is overwhelmingly unpopular, every second after that.

Only 15 percent -- 15 percent believe abortion should be legal, in all cases, in the second trimester. Only 15 percent.

Only 8 percent of Americans believe it should be legal in the third trimester. All the time.

GLENN: It shows you who is running the Democratic Party. And who is running California.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: They're talking about now, up to 30 days after birth. In California.

STU: It's incredible. And illegal in most cases, is only 19 percent third trimester. And 34 percent second trimester. These are not close calls. This is one of -- in some ways, third trimester abortion is one of the most uniting things in our public discourse.

GLENN: Yeah. That and voting rights.

STU: People oppose it.

GLENN: Voter ID. Those things are very uniting in America. But they just require common sense. And that's not what you're getting. I mean, I was watching the news early this morning, and I'm hearing these stories, that have absolutely no connection to reality. At all.

And you think, are you that stupid?

And I think the answer is, yeah. I think there's a lot of Americans, that are that stupid.

They are just people who watch the news. NBC. Good. CNN, truth-tellers. And they just watch it. And they just swallow the garbage.

I think there are those people that are that stupid. I think there are those people, that are that conspiratorial. That, you know, watch, man didn't walk on moon.

Gay frogs did. And they just -- you know, they swallow it too. Which one are you?

I have to tell you, I think this is actually a very good thing.

In -- in many ways.

I know that it is going to make California, New York. If indeed this comes outed, and they say, yes. This is the decision.

It's going to make California and New York, go crazy.

And all of the lefty states will go crazy.

California now is talking about taking tax dollars. And flying people into the state. So they can have abortions.

You know, if I'm in California. And I've been on the fence. You know, jeez, I really like it here. Or my family is here. Or whatever it is.

I think this is going to be one of those things, that push you over the edge.

And I think the states are going to do what federalism really kind of encourages. And that is, you know what, you do your thing. Where you are. And we'll do our thing, where we are. And leave each other alone.

I think this is going to be -- this is going to self-sort people. Because I couldn't live in California now for many reasons. I couldn't before. But if you're talking about doing abortion. Thirty days after a child is born.

And you're talking about flying people in, with tax dollars. I'm pretty sure, we're going to slide into the ocean.

I mean, I just think, we will be destroyed. That's what I would be thinking as a Californian. You know what I mean?

Yeah. We're on the wrong side here.

And just to play it safe. Maybe I'm agnostic. But if there is a God, he's going to stop this from going on. And I think the sides are going to become very, very clear.

Which is what I wanted, from the beginning, honestly. I wanted a debate, with, you know, Michael Lee or Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders.

Let's just put it out in the open. Those are the two choices. We're either going to leave each other alone, and be a country of -- of Federalist laws, and a Constitution. Or we're going to change into something Marxist.

Which one? Which one do you want, America?

And, you know, I think half the country, maybe 40 percent would pick, you know, let's try this new thing. Marxism. Like it's new.

We'll try this new thing. I think only about maybe 15 percent really know what that mean -- what that means. And what the effects would be, and really wanted.

You know, but you get a lot of people going along with it. Just because. Something new. You know, let's try it. It's fresh.

And I think the rest of the people are like, I can't live with -- I can't do it anymore.

I mean, I want to -- I wrote this right before I went on the air. Just making some notes on the thing.

And I -- it was a note to myself.

Just remember, this is a very important story, but the whole thing is about distracting you.

We are almost in a war with Russia. And I think we are going there. I hope to God, we're not. But war with Russia. We are going to war in the streets.

We have a war, being waged right now, on our republic. They are going to be talking about court packing. And getting rid of the filibuster. They're already talking about ESG. The Great Reset. Getting rid of capitalism. As we know it.

There's a war on the vote, and voter integrity.

There's a -- a war on truth, with gender. All of this stuff. No. Men can have a baby. Well, if men can have a baby, then I guess I have a place at the table, to talk about abortion. Right?

Because I'm a man. And you just said, I could have a baby. There's no such thing as a gender. So I guess I can understand this too.

There's a war on truth, with the DHS, and the disinformation board.

The ministry of truth. You think they're actually looking for the truth?

No. There's a war on your dollar.

To get you to not own anything. And like it. War on inflation. War on energy. War on our children. War on our schools. War for our families.

America, you need to understand, and shake off the, oh, well, it's -- it will fix itself. It will right itself. I wonder what will happen next. You're at war. It's not a shooting war. God forbid it ever does, but you are at war. Which side are you on?


How the WHO's 'pandemic treaty' could CONTROL governments

On May 22nd, the World Health Assembly — which is the governing body of The World Health Organization — will meet in Switzerland to discuss next steps for its ‘pandemic treaty [and its] quest to use public health to expand The WHO’s power over sovereign states,’ Daniel Horowitz reports for TheBlaze. He explains how certain amendments to be added to this treaty could ‘allow the director-general of the WHO to declare a public health emergency in a country and unilaterally coerce its citizens to take certain actions.’ The far-left and global elite continue to destroy our sovereignty, Glenn says, and this is just one more step toward their desired global government.

Read more:


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I read some stuff this morning. I've been doing some research on what's happening with the WHO. And I read their stuff today, that will make your head explode. And is really evil and important.

But let me give you this today, from -- from Daniel Horowitz at TheBlaze. States must preemptively nullify any WHO international pandemic regulation.

I'm going to read it verbatim because it's just so well-written. And now is the time, that things are shifting. We're going to. There's going to be a New World Order out there. And we've got to lead it. And we have to unite the rest of the free world in doing it. That's Joe Biden. March 21st, 2022.

Any Republican that is running without mentioning your intent to fight the global pandemic treaty or regulations, might as well run as a Democrat. This is really super important, and it is beginning to happen next week. On May 22nd, the world health assembly, the governing body of the World Health Organization, is going to meet in Geneva Switzerland to discuss the next step in its pandemic treaty. And the quest to use public health to expand the WHO's power over sovereign states. Representatives from 193 nations, including the US, will be attending the only country, not invited is Taiwan.

Gee, I wonder why. So what is this treaty? On January 24th, 2022, the director general of the WHO explained the treaty was a priority, to urgently strength the WHO, as leading and the director authority on global health, at the center of the global health architecture. He laid out the guiding principle of this plot. We, quote, all want a world in which science triumphs over misinformation. Solidarity triumphs over division. And equity is a reality, not an aspiration. He said, we are one world, we have one health. We are one WHO.

Now, this has not been announced. Biden has not even spoken about it. They are deathly quiet about this. But they're going to be approving amendments. The proposed amendments are essentially going to allow the director general of the WHO to declare public health emergencies in any country. And unilaterally coerce its citizens to take certain actions. Here's one of the amendments, a critical section from article nine. The WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the state party, whose territory the event is allegedly occurring. But this is the way it's going to read. Now, WHO may take into account, reports from sources of other than notifications or consultations -- consultations shall assess these reports, according to established principles. And then communicate information on the event, to the state party, in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring.

Now, they have scratched out, before taking any action based on reports, the WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the state party. That's all gone. They're taking that out.

So WHO gets information, has reports, and they can act without verifying with the president or anybody else.

Why would you be erasing the requirement, for the WHO to consult with the government?

Number four. If the state party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO, it used to say, May. It now says, WHO shall -- when justified by the magnitude of public health risk, immediately share with other state parties, the information available, whilst encouraging the state party to accept the offer of collaboration, by the WHO. It used to say there, while taking into accounts the views of the state party concerned.

So they're erasing all of our sovereignty. This is going to be another thing. They're going to say, is a conspiracy theory. It is not. You can look it all up. It is the world health agenda. From the World Health Organization. They are meeting in Geneva, on May 22nd. So that's next week. They are intentionally quiet on this.

Because they know the power. Now, we also know what the WHO is. You remember, when everybody was saying, we have to get out of the WHO.

They're just a tool of China. Why would you say that?

Forget that I mentioned that Taiwan is the only country that is not invited to this in Geneva.

PAT: Yeah. That's completely -- completely irrelevant.

GLENN: Completely. Amen, brother.

PAT: I don't even know why you brought it up in the first place.

GLENN: Thank you. Thank you.

PAT: It's a good thing they weren't actually -- I wish we weren't invited to it.

GLENN: Well, I will tell you this. Another reason why Donald Trump. They fought so hard to keep him out: Because he wouldn't have --

PAT: He sure wouldn't have. That's exactly right.

GLENN: He wouldn't have empowered the WHO.

PAT: Well, he took us out of the WHO.

GLENN: That's exactly right. And this president is not only putting us back, they're taking away our sovereignty.

And so it's one more piece to the global governance of the left. Warning.


Kamala repeats herself 5 TIMES in 30 seconds…

Kamala Harris, America's no. 2 in command, just spoke at a climate change conference. So how'd you think she did? Was she eloquent and able to lay out a vision for a better world? Probably not, but check this video out and let's all find out.


Right vs. Left: The Time for Compromise Is OVER | Jesse Kelly | Ep 146

The Left worked for decades to get control, and now they have it: “Every cultural pillar has been infected and taken over,” Jesse Kelly warns Glenn. So, it’s time to get out of the stands and onto the field. On this episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast," the host of the nationally syndicated "Jesse Kelly Show" joins with a blunt message for the Right: The time for compromise is gone. This system that’s raising young people who hate America can’t be salvaged, and while taking back Congress in 2022 would be nice, LOCAL victories are what really matter. But this won’t be a quick fight. Thankfully, Jesse has some solutions, and they involve Play-Doh …


Where are our STANDARDS, America?

Since when are we the people that throw our hands up and accept the new normal?

We're the people, that despite all odds, we took it on. We didn't settle for less. And that's what they're telling you to do now, settle for less.

No. That's not who we are. Why would we be willing to sit around and wait for the government to fix it?

Don't lower your standards. That's un-American. We don't lower our standards. We raise standards. And that is our legacy.