RADIO

2 more reasons why Texas' Beto O’Rourke is SCUM

Beto O’Rourke demonstrated perfectly on Wednesday why voters in Texas CONTINUE to reject the failed politician. The way he interrupted Governor Greg Abbott’s press conference in Uvalde — clearly as a staged, political stunt — proves he’s ‘human trash,’ Glenn and Stu say. But there’s another reason — one you've probably never heard before — why Beto likely will never win another election: Glenn reads SHOCKING writings from O’Rourke’s teenage years, uncovered by Reuters years ago…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Oh, my gosh. Do we have the audio of the political stunt that Beto O'Rourke did, as -- where he danced on the dead bodies of children?

Listen.

VOICE: Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me.

VOICE: Sit down. You're out of line. And an embarrassment.

VOICE: Is right now -- and you're doing nothing.

VOICE: No.

VOICE: This is totally predictable when you choose not to --

VOICE: Sir, you're out of line.

GLENN: Now, this is a mayor who has --

VOICE: Sir, you're out of line. Please leave the auditorium. I can't believe you're a sick son of a bitch to come to a deal like this to make a political issue.

STU: I love that guy. I freaking love him.

GLENN: I love the fact that he had a walker.

STU: Yeah. And he comes up, and he's like, get out of here, you sick son of a --

STU: Yeah. That's exactly the -- because, you know what, Beto is human trash. He is scum. He is the scum of the earth. The lowest form of humanity, our society can produce.

GLENN: Now, Wait a minute. He said after he was there, he was just listening. And he just couldn't take it anymore.

STU: Oh, really? That's what happened, huh? That's interesting. Because everyone seems to notice, that this was obviously staged. From the beginning. And I go back to what happened before this. We don't know exactly. Maybe we'll learn in the coming days. But let me translate the series of events that led up to this moment. Beto O'Rourke.

GLENN: Was there in -- listening to the whole thing.

STU: No. He was not. Let's go back before that. Let's go back to the meeting, that Beto O'Rourke had with his staff. And at some point, and I'll translate it. Because I don't have the exact language. But I'll tell you exactly what was said in the meeting.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: It was Beto O'Rourke saying, hey. How exactly can we take advantage of all of these dead children?

GLENN: Wow.

STU: And turn it around, so it's good for us. How do we raise money off the bodies of these dead children?

GLENN: Hold on just a second.

STU: Tomorrow.

GLENN: Hold on just a second. You don't have a transcript. You don't know that Beto O'Rourke said that. And I have to tell you, Stu, I don't think he's smart enough to come up. That had to be someone else in the room. And he went, yeah.

STU: Maybe you're right. Maybe you're right. But I don't know who said it. All I know is that this was obviously planned. Clearly planned. And we can go through -- yeah. Even CBS News pointed it out. Blatantly a staged event. And this guy, because he wants more power and more money, decided that this event was about him. He wanted to make the death of 19 children and two teachers, about Beto O'Rourke, because he's human scum. He is the worst form of life imaginable on this earth.

GLENN: These things might work in New York.

STU: Yeah. Good luck with it.

GLENN: Or Washington or Delaware. It's not going to work here. You know, the only one that had the other opinion of, hey, maybe gun control is Matthew McConaughey. And he seemed like a decent. I disagreed with him. But he was a decent human being about it.

STU: Yeah. Totally. He obviously doesn't know that much about the details of the issues. But he, I think comes from a good place. Here's a guy, Matthew McConaughey's statement.

Was like, hey, gosh. How do we stop this? We need to do something. All right. That's not an educated viewpoint on this. All right?

Everybody posted on social media. If you know anything about these topics. The -- the argument of, well, why don't we do something, is just vapid? Right?

It's just a giant, shallow, empty vessel of a view. It's a stand-in for intellect.

But Beto O'Rourke is a totally different issue. He is the worst. All he did was try to get attention. And, you know what, his next job, which, by the way, will not be governor of the state of Texas. His next job at MSNBC or whatever. This crap will help him.

And that's all this is about him for him. He's pathetic.

GLENN: Again, again. MSNBC, I -- I mean, he is going to be behind a microphone. But I think it's going to be. Hi, welcome to McDonald's. May I take your order, please?

STU: If he's lucky.

GLENN: Would you like fries with that?

STU: Well, and the thing is too, look, this is a very desperate man in a very desperate position doing very desperate things.

GLENN: It's disgusting.

STU: And if you want to get past how revolting a human being you must be to think this is appropriate, if you want to get past that for a second, and you get to the point of just political strategy. You can make the argument, right? He is so -- his -- his hill he's climbing is so far up his -- so steep, that maybe ridiculous stunts and pathetic things like this is the right thing to do. Maybe you goad Greg Abbott into making a mistake. And saying something really bad. When he walks out.

You know, unfortunately, for him, you left Greg Abbott and Dan Patrick with the microphones. So you're getting taken out of the room. Where no one can hear you blab about your nonsense. And they have the microphones. And they handled it really, really well.

GLENN: Well, well.

STU: And I honestly -- if Greg Abbott did what that mayor did, it would have been bad. But the fact that the mayor did it. You know, that guy was not standing up for this nonsense. He didn't want this to be about politics. This is his freaking city. And he sat there with just righteous indignation. And, man, I felt for him.

And I thought Abbott and Patrick handled it really well. And the mayor did too. We bleeped it out. He just calls him an A-hole from the -- and that's exactly what needed to happen.

GLENN: That's exactly who he is.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: By the way, why didn't the police -- why didn't the police see it.

I mean, BLM came out yesterday, against the racist police. And how they -- how did they know? Why didn't they stop this kid?

And, you know, you're right. You had all kinds of warnings, that this would be a bad kid, right?

All kinds of warnings. Reuters is reporting, some really disturbing writing. One day, I'm going to quote.

One day, I was driving home from work, I noticed two children crossing the street. They were happy, happy to be free from their troubles.

This is happy. This happiness was mine by right. I had earned it in my dream. As I neared the young ones, I put all my weight on my right foot, keeping the accelerating down on to the floor, until I hear the crashing of two children on the hood.

Then the sharp cry of pain from one of the two. I was so fascinated for a moment, that when after I had stopped my vehicle, I just sat in a daze, sweet visions filling my head. Right?

Dangerous. Right? Nothing good is going to come of this.

According to Reuters, those are the teenage writings of Beto O'Rourke.

STU: Oh, my God. Really?

GLENN: Yep. In writings that Reuters say still exist online, O'Rourke reportedly fantasized about toppling the government, but doubted that the masses would support such a radical move at this time. Then he also wrote about murdering children, by running over them with his car.

STU: This is -- this is the ultimate red flag for the red flag law.

GLENN: Exactly right. Exactly right. I'm glad that he's against guns. The state of Texas should be very aware and not allow him to buy any guns.

STU: Oh, my gosh.

GLENN: Because of this. This guy -- this guy. And his righteous indignation. Give it a rest, bud. Give it a rest.

All right. Back in just a second with -- with more. First, let me tell you about Patriot Mobile. Just because the Biden administration paused the creation of the disinformation board, the fight is not over.

They haven't -- all they're doing is looking into, who was providing the disinformation?

And now they have Chertoff running it. The former Department of Homeland Security chief.

By the way, who told me in an interview in 2005, I was talking to him, we were off the air. And I said, what's your cell phone?

And he said, cell phone? I don't have a cell phone. I said, what do you mean you don't have a cell phone?

He said, Glenn, if people -- this is 2005. If people knew how easily it was to get and listen and know everything about a person, because of their cell phone. Nobody in America would have one.

STU: Hmm. I remembered that.

GLENN: You remember that?

STU: I remember that moment.

STU: And gosh, how accurate was that?

GLENN: Oh, sure. Sure. I don't have a cell phone.

I said, how do you communicate with people? The old-fashioned way. Memos.

Oh. Okay. All right.

Now I feel really stupid. Because you're the guy in charge of watching everybody. Now they're going to put him in charge of the -- the disinformation board. So that's going to go well. The guy who did the Patriot Act, but I digress.

The New York Times ADMITS the Deep State Exists and DEFENDS It?!
RADIO

The New York Times ADMITS the Deep State Exists and DEFENDS It?!

While much of the media has spent the past few years denying the existence of a “Deep State,” The New York Times has released a piece admitting that it’s REAL. However, the piece also DEFENDS the Deep State as helpful and “actually kind of awesome.” Glenn and Stu tear apart this argument and explains to the Times what the Deep State really is.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: The New York Times has come out with a great editorial. It's about the Deep State. Now, Stu, what's the New York Times' opinion of the Deep State.

What has it been?

STU: Not even real. What are you talking about? It's fake.

GLENN: It's not real.

STU: It's a creation of conspiracy theorists like you. Who just -- start a fever dream to explain all the problems that you have created yourself.

GLENN: Right. Correct. Amen.

Well, here's the New York Times opinion of the Deep State.

It turns out, the Deep State is, actually, kind of awesome.

As America closes in on a major election, mistrust is brewing around the mysterious government entity, that's now denounced in scary-sounding terms. The Deep State. The swamp.

But what do those words even mean? Who exactly do they describe? What we went on a road trip to find out. And as we met with the Americans who are being dismissed as public enemies, we discovered, that they are us!

They like Taylor Swift. They dance Bachada. I guess. I don't know.

So I don't dance that. They go to bed at night, watching Star Trek reruns. They go to work and they do their jobs. Saving us from Armageddon.

Sure, our tax -- can you imagine if we said, Donald Trump will save us from Armageddon. What they will say. Sure, our tax dollars pay them. But as you see on the video. What a return on investment we get.

When we hear Deep State, instead of recoiling, we should rally. We should think of the workers otherwise known as our public servants. The everyday superheroes, who wake up every day, ready to dedicate their careers and their lives to serving us.

Are these the Americans we employ. Even though their work is often invisible. No, it's not. That's why we know they're existing. It makes our lives better.

No, it's not. Because we usually don't notice when things are better. We only notice them when they're bad.

If Donald Trump is reelected and enacts schedule F, that could change. Oh, yes, please.

He would have the power to eviscerate the so-called Deep State. Are they calling for evisceration of people?

Did you hear that, Stu?

Let me read that again. I don't think there's any way to read that, other than they're encouraging him, and their people are cheering it on.

That he would take a knife, stick it in somebody's the guts. Pull out all of their organs and entrails. Eviscerating how many thousands and millions now of people. Is the New York Times saying they want to eviscerate. I don't -- I don't wow.

Well, he would have the power to eviscerate the so-called Deep State. And replace our public servants with people that work for him, not us. In the video above, you'll see a few of our hard-working American servants. We hope you'll agree that they're not scary at all.

In fact, they're kind of awesome. That's the New York Times.

Now, I just want to point out, that they have said forever, the Deep State doesn't exist.

Now, it does exist. But it's kind of awesome.

Kind of like, hmm. I don't know. CRT.

It doesn't exist in your school. Oh, well, it does. But it's not what it you say it is.

It's, actually, awesome. DEI. It doesn't exist. What are you talking about. It's a conspiracy theory.

Okay. It does exist. But it's kind of awesome.

ESG. That's not real. That doesn't exist. Okay. It's real. And it might be bad. Okay. It's bad.

Well, that's what we're saying is bad. So we're going to say we're stopping it.

But we're not, actually, stopping it.

Because it's kind of awesome. How about -- how about the cries for 25-dollar an hour minimum wage 25 bucks. Remember when we all said, that was crazy. And everybody said, well, that's just Bernie Sanders. Really?

You know, health workers in California, yeah. How much are they getting?

Twenty-five bucks, aren't they?

STU: Yeah. Twenty-five bucks an hour.

GLENN: Twenty-five bucks an hour. Yeah, so health care workers now have it in California.

Seattle is paying $26 for a sandwich if it's delivered to your house by Uber, because of what the state has done. And Barbara Lee now is not saying, $25. Because that was crazy.

Now in her Senate campaign. She's calling for $55 minimum wage. It's kind of awesome.

Gender mutilation of our children. You know, that's not happening. Okay. It is.

But it's really good for kids. Oh. There's no pornography in our public school libraries.

Well, there is. Because madam, madam, madam. We are in a city council meeting.

You cannot read that. Because it's kind of awesome. Government censorship. That is not happening. That's just a right-wing conspiracy theory.

We're not censoring social media or shutting people down. We're not involved in that.

Okay. Yes, we are.

And now that you're on to us, we think you're violating our First Amendment right to speak.

Oh, my gosh. How about inflation is transitory.

You're too stupid to understand, that you're not really paying, higher inflation. To now, what the -- what's happening this week.

The fed has now said, yeah. 2 percent inflation. That's not really a target we can hit. Maybe three. Three and a half percent inflation every year.

Oh. Okay. I thought you had that under control. Oh, abortion.

That nobody is saying abortion all the way up to birth. And then some. Oh, yes. We are.

Because it's neat. It's awesome. We should shout our abortion. And one of my personal favorites. We are not banning gas stoves. Okay. Yes, we are.

But it's awesome. Look at their pattern. So now, they know, that everyone knows, the Deep State. What is the Deep State.

It's not awesome. And it's not just your neighbor. Okay?

The Deep State is a -- is a blob that you don't elect. You don't know who they are.

That will make new regulations. Without going to you, or Congress.

They will make regulations. For instance, you now have to register with the Treasury, if you're a small business owner. You have under 20 employees.

You now have to fill out ail kinds of forms. And file it with their criminal division of the Treasury. Making small business owners, feel like a criminal, and if we miss anything, or we don't do it right. Or anything changes like our address. And we don't notify the Treasury, we could go to jail for ten years.

That kind of stuff. Or here's one.

We're all going to be driving electric cars by 2035. That didn't go through Congress. That didn't go through Congress.

That was just pencil pushers and the president.

Hey. You know what, you can find that regulation. Go ahead and, yeah. Find that regulation.

I know we can -- I know we can. You know what, let's tell people, that we're not debanking people.

And then we'll debank them.

And then when we find out, that we are debanking people. We'll just say, yeah. But we're doing that to protect the country.

Because there's these extremists.

No. The extremists are the ones, that are pointing out, the Constitution doesn't give you the right to do these things.

The Deep State is a group of people that do not care about the election, because they're not elected. They just do whatever it is, they want to do, in their agency, no matter who the president is.

Remember, last time, the State Department fought against Donald Trump, all the way.

They were sabotaging him, and almost every agency. The agencies work for the president.

They're part of his cabinet. He oversees the administrative arm. So if you're not working for the president, who are you working for?

Well, I'm working for the American people. No. Constitutionally, that doesn't work.

Constitutionally, you're supposed to be protecting and defending the Constitution. Which means you should read it. And in that, you would see that the CEO of our country, that runs the administrative state. Is the president.

Ask there are checks and balances with Congress. You don't work for Congress.

You work for the president. And he hopefully, is working for the American people. Not some, I don't know. Energy company, in China. Let's say. Just off the top of my head, nobody in particular springs to mind.

Is THIS Why Airplanes Keep FALLING APART?!
RADIO

Is THIS Why Airplanes Keep FALLING APART?!

There have been a lot of alarming stories in the news lately about Boeing planes malfunctioning and falling apart mid-air. But media outlets like Wired are insisting that noticing this trend is just playing into a “far-right” conspiracy theory. So, what’s the truth here? Are there major problems with companies like Boeing and United Airlines? Are these problems intentional? Were they caused by DEI policies? And WHERE IS Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg?! Glenn breaks it all down and explains how China is taking advantage of it either way.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So the USAID disinformation primer targets gamers, advertisers, memes, and the so-called right not to be disinformed.

And that's, of course, a civil right, that our Founders talked about all the time.

You know, that -- that right to not be disinformed.

Now, there are some conspiracy theories out this.

I found out from wired this -- this weekend. This information is pretty disturbing.

Over the past week, airplanes made by bogey, have been involved in numerous incidents.

Including, midair emergencies. Leaking hydraulic fluid. A wheel falling off a plane as it took off. Pilots losing control of a plane mid-journey.

One plane just mysteriously driving off the tarmac into the grass field.

And a plane plummeting and suddenly falling out of the sky, injuring 50 people. As a result, right-wing influencers and far right extremists are once again spreading a conspiracy theory that Boeing's problems are all due to the airplane manufacturer's supposed embrace of diversity.

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Now, as a -- what am I? A far-right extremist, I guess is what they would -- a right-wing influencer, is I guess what they would call me. I don't think it's all of that. But I suspect that it plays a role.

This time around, they're even going further. Some are even claiming that accidents are happening intentionally.

And Boeing is failing on purpose. As part of a global conspiracy to bring down western civilization.

And promote communism. And countries like China.

Well, now, that seems a little harsh. Now, James Lindsey, last week, was on Joe Rogan.

And I think that's pretty much what he is saying.

That they're doing it intentionally.

I haven't talked to James about this. But I don't think it's being done intentionally by bogey. I don't think Boeing is sitting around and going, you know what, we should fail, so China could take over.
Don't think that's happening.

I do think the DEI, is a direct -- this is a true and correct result of DEI. And those -- that kind of thinking.

For instance, when you say, let's reimagine the police, and fire a bunch of the police.

What the direct result, Stu, that we've seen?

STU: Usually, a lot of police, no longer wanted to be employed by those cities, and crime increasing. And people living much less safe existences.

GLENN: Yes, right. Huh. Okay. So there's -- there's one. There's one.

You know, when you -- when you start to promote transgenderism in school.

You know, the population is maybe one percent transgender.

But now schools are reporting, that up to 30 percent of the class, is claiming to be transgender. So do you think that is connected at all?

STU: You know, I don't know if scientific consensus has arrived at a theory yet, Glenn. But it does seem -- you know, correlation does not equal causation in some cases, Glenn. It's important to note that.

GLENN: There you go. There you go.

STU: But it is interesting that after all of these things that we've been talking about occur, we seem to see consequences that might be expected from them.


GLENN: Yes. Yeah. That's weird.

Now, these people are spreading all kinds of lies.

Are some even claiming accidents are happening intentionally. The claims began earlier this year, according to Wire. After a part of a Boeing-built Alaska airline plane blew off during a flight.

Far right figures claimed the airlines were now more dangerous, not because of the faults with production process. But because they force diversity, equality, and inclusion policies. Which conspiracy theorist claim, without any proof, resulted in putting unqualified flight crews into the cockpit.

The same far right figures are now claiming that Boeing's support of environmental, social, and governance ESG policies and DEI have led to plummeting standards in the manufacturing process.

Well, what else has happened at Boeing? What else -- I mean, I would love an answer.

I can't seem to -- where did I leave my Pete Buttigieg.

I can't seem to find him anywhere. I don't find an answer from him. But what else is happening?

STU: This is just not appropriate. Now, it is interesting, Glenn.

Even going back to old-school advertising. Right?

If you go back to old-school advertising.

You hear companies say, we are obsessed with quality. All we think about every day is how to make your experience better. How to make that food taste a little bit better. How to make that automobile the -- the perfect -- I mean, remember those videos they used to have in the commercials.

Where they would show the wind tunnels. Like the arrow dynamics. And focus on these tiny details that no car buyer would ever really think about when buying a car.

But the point was, they were so obsessed with their product.

You were getting someone who thought about that, all the time. That's all they cared about.

Therefore, they're getting the best experience. Now their commercials are, we never think about the product. All we do is think about how many vaginas have we employed?

How many people like having vaginas nearby when they're in bed! Whether they're women or whether they're men.

How many times -- how many boxes can we put on the little checkmark list, that when gender comes up, and they give you all of this nonsense.

How many. Wait. How many people, with the certain levels of melanin are employed here?

When they tell you, that's what they care about, it's pretty freaking natural to think, maybe quality isn't their main focus.

GLENN: Thank you for flying United Airlines, this is your non-white vagina speaking from the cockpit, which we don't really like. I don't like to use vagina and cockpit in the same phrase. But we're working on that.

This is really bad.

Okay. So I posted. I am in this article too. Because I posted last week, about the C919, which is the Chinese 737.

And when I say it's a 737, it's not.
Because a 737 says Boeing, and this one says Commack on the side.

Other than that, it's almost as if someone stole the plans of a 737 from Boeing. And is making now.

So they're starting to market their new 737.

What is Boeing going to do?

Boeing will go out of business, if it doesn't come up with the answers. I mean, are you going to fly United?

STU: Right now, I don't think it's a good idea.

GLENN: No, it doesn't. I'm not suggesting anything you know, I don't -- you know, you -- I never thought I would ever say this about Americans on American-made planes. But, hey, if you want to roll the dice, it's your life.

That's not a good slogan.

United. What the hell!

Roll the dice.
(laughter)
I don't think that's good. I don't think that's good.

So, you know, when people start noticing.

And it's fascinating to me, that everything is blamed on bowing.

I think this.

To me, this seems more like maybe it's a problem of maintenance from United.

But I don't know. Because I can't find my Pete Buttigieg. So I have no idea, whose problem is this? Whose fault is it?

My guess is they have either disgruntled or, you know, just really, really, really unqualified people working on the plane. You know, like, I don't know.

I just finished working on it.

These four screws were left behind.

But, you know, the IKEA furniture stands up without all those screws.

So I think you're fine. Clearer up.

You know.

It could be that. It could be Boeing. It could be a combination of both of them.

STU: It does --

GLENN: But isn't it interesting, that when you have the CEO of United come out in a dress.

And like, we're doing transgender script shows all the time. And our pilots and our stewardesses, the mechanics, they love it. They love it.

Look at me, I'm dressed as a woman now. What's your problem.

When he seems to be so focused, on drag shows, and DEI, I don't know.

Were the people at United Airlines just looking for a lot of -- they're like, everything is done.

Joe, it's 19:15 in the morning. I don't have a thing to do. Everything is running so great. Why don't we spend the day on diversity?

Now, maybe. But I kind of doubt it.

STU: It goes back to what you -- what you are focusing on as a company.

Glenn, you're a guy who collects watches. Ever since I've known you, you've collected watches. And the watch. The watch is expensive.

Usually, not because it can keep time like your i Phone.

Right? Like the craftsmanship is why it's expensive.

The stories you've told me.

GLENN: No. I know. But hang on just a second.

There's several reasons why things are expensive. One is image and brand.

And there's many watches that are much better. Like everybody thinks. Oh, Rolex watch, that's -- it's not. It's a good watch.

But it's not -- it's not a craftsman time piece, you know what I mean?

There are watches that will take a year-plus. To make. All made by hand, by one person. And they run forever, you know what I mean?

So there is something to say, that something is made of real quality and real craftsmanship. And I would say, that used to be Boeing.

And then there's those that are just really popular, that are, you know, like I would say, that's the F-35. And that doesn't really run.

Yeah. It will take off.

We hope that it will land.

And, you know, 70 percent of them aren't ready for any kind of combat.

But, hey, it's very popular and cool to look at, isn't it?


And then there's just crap.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And that's because the company doesn't care.

STU: Right.

And when you are in a situation like this. When you are having issues like, I don't know. Maybe people have noticed Boeing over the past few years, having issues.

One of the few ways you push back against that. Is to talk about how focused you are on quality.

Even in sports. You have teams that -- that they -- they are posting pictures of themselves out in clubs. Late at night. On Instagram. And doing these things.

And look, every single team, has players that go out to late dinners. And go to clubs, right?

That is the lifestyle of a 25-year-old athlete. Right?

Everyone knows that. But if you're constantly telling your fans, hey, we're out doing that.

People will think, well, hey. Why aren't you getting sleep. Why aren't you at the gym? Why aren't you working on your game? We all know that companies can do more than one thing.

Like, there's no reason, why Boeing theoretically couldn't have more efforts. They probably always had them at some level.

But they don't promote it all the time. The main thing your business does.

GLENN: After the 1970s, and all cars, and trucks were deemed worthless from America, because the quality was so bad.

What did Ford come up with for their slogan? Ford, where quality is job up.

STU: Hmm. Yeah. Job one!

GLENN: Okay. That's what you do!

Where is the advertisement for United, saying, we will get you there?

Because our pilots will die too. And we don't want them to die. Because they're drag queens.

Where is the safety? Where is Boeing saying that? Boeing should be leading the way on the news of what's happening in their company. And they're not. And it's almost, as if the mainstream media is doing everything they can, to keep -- can you imagine ten years ago, if any -- Glenn Beck airlines, United Airlines. Any airline had the problems that United Airlines was having right now. No one would fly them.

Because the media would only be talking about what's happening at United. That's causing all of these planes.

STU: Yeah. Totally.

You're totally right.

GLENN: That's all it would be.

STU: You have to get people to be comfortable that your plane won't take off from LA to New York. And have several other landings in the way in Omaha and Nevada. Right?

You have to be able to convince people that you can get people there in one piece. And I will add to your analysis of that, Glenn, the media would be non-stop on whoever the Transportation Secretary was under a Trump administration. You know their name. You would know everything about everything they were doing, every day.

Supreme Court Justice Makes CRAZY Argument for MORE Censorship?!
RADIO

Supreme Court Justice Makes CRAZY Argument for MORE Censorship?!

During the Supreme Court hearing on Murthy v. Missouri, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson tried to argue that the government’s First Amendment rights were under attack. According to her, the government should have the ability under the First Amendment to pressure social media companies to censor people. But Glenn had some other thoughts. If the government can violate your rights when there’s “trouble,” Glenn argues, then you don’t have rights. Glenn lays out how that’s NOT the US Constitution. That’s the SOVIET Constitution.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, I don't know if you heard Justice Jackson yesterday.

But woo!

Was she -- she's in tune with our system of government. Here she is, yesterday, where free speech is on trial. The government is making the claim, that their free speech is being limited, because they want to tell social media what to do.

And their First Amendment rights, are being trampled on.

Just so you know, the government doesn't have First Amendment rights. The First Amendment right goes to the people. And it says, that the government can't tell you what you can say and what you can't say.

Here is justice brown Jackson yesterday.

VOICE: Justice Jackson.

VOICE: My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways, in the most important time periods.

I mean, what would -- what would you have the government do? I've heard you say a couple of times, that the government can post its own speech.

But in my hypothetical. You know, kids, this is not safe. Don't do it is not going to get it done.

And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country.

GLENN: Right.

VOICE: And you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. So can you help me?

Because I'm really worried about that. Because you've got the First Amendment operating.

GLENN: Okay. Sure. Uh-huh.

VOICE: In an environment of threatening circumstances, from the government's perspective. And you're saying that the government can't interact with the source of those problems.

GLENN: Okay. Sure.

I would love to help you with that. I would love to help you with that. Let me help you.

And I appreciate your asking for help. Don't usually experience that, you know, cry for help on understanding any of the amendments, let alone the first one from a Supreme Court justice. But I appreciate your willingness to say, I really don't have a clue as to what I'm doing here.

See, we have a Bill of Rights, that was built -- our country is built, up like any other country in the world.

And our Bill of Rights came from a -- a Founding Era, where they had been really living under the thumb of a tyrant. And so they knew tyranny firsthand. And it made them very, very skittish about governments, and what they could do.

Because when governments speak, that's one thing. The government can speak, and say, hey. This is bad. You shouldn't do this.

But when governments coerce people, especially businesses, well, they've got an awful lot of power.

And that can turn into tyranny quickly.

Now, the -- the Bill of Rights was written, and especially the First Amendment, was -- was written, for those bad times.

You know, you -- I know you're worried about, well, these -- I mean, freedom of speech is great. Unless things are, you know, troubled.

Well, okay. But that's why think wrote this down.

Our documents are a negative charter of liberties.

So it means that the Bill of Rights, apply to the citizens, but not to the governments. The government cannot do anything to violate these rights. And if, you know, it changes when there's trouble, or when the government feels there's trouble, well, then, you don't really have the right, do you?

And I really don't have any shackles, on the presidency. The administration, or the government.

What you have, actually, is another Constitution, written in 1936. It was really great. Because of the way it -- I mean, it was way advanced.

All voting restrictions were taken off. Universal direct suffrage. The right to work.

Guaranteed by the previous Constitution. In addition, to 1936, and, by the way, I'm not talking about Germany. Okay.

1936. The Constitution recognized the collective and economic rights. Including the right to work. The right to rest. The health protection.

Care in old age. And in sickness. The right to housing and education and cultural benefits.

It was really a cutting edge Constitution. Because everybody wants that stuff, right?

You have a universal right to it.

And all of the government bodies, had to help provide those things, because you, the citizen have a right.

And they want right direct election, of all government bodies. And they -- they reorganized it, at 36.

And they just -- they streamlined the government. You know, so there wasn't a lot of red tape. So Article 122, in the -- in the Constitution, said that women, are accorded equal rights with men.

Now, this is 1936.

Think about how advanced this is.

Women have equal rights with men, in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social, and political life.

In fact, they were really the first one to make sure that there was, you know, kindergartens, and a universal right to kindergarten, and maternity leave, and prematernity, and protection of the mom and her interests.

It was really, really good. In article 122. In 123. That was the equal rights for all citizens.

It was -- it was equity for everybody. Irrespective of their nationality or their race.

In all spheres of life. And they wanted to make sure that there was racial inclusiveness, and no hatred, or contempt. Or restrictions of rights and privileges on account of nationality or race.

And if you did any of these hate crimes, it was punishable by law. So this is now the -- the Soviet Constitution of 1936. And it was the longest running Constitution of the Soviet Union. And it was great. Article 124, guaranteed freedom of religion.

Including the separation of church and state. And school from church.

And 124, it ensured all citizens the freedom of conscience. Freedom of religious worship. And freedom of any anti-reckless propaganda, recognized for all citizens. Which was nice, and in 124, Stalin, in the face of real stiff opposition there, eventually said, you know what, maybe we should talk to the Russian orthodox church. Maybe we should allow them to exist. And he did, kind of. But it was all within the Constitution. Because see, this Constitution is a Constitution of positive liberties. Unlike ours, negative liberties. Telling the government what it cannot do. Theirs is a positive liberty. All the things the government must do.

And article 125. Remember, this is 1936. Article 125 of the Constitution, guaranteed freedom of speech in the press. And freedom of assembly.

Then they said, look, the Communist Party really needs to come together.

And we can have diversity in the Communist Party. But it's only one party in the free elections. So you could -- you could do that.

Now, this Constitution, was written in 1936.

And it was thoroughly democratic. Thoroughly democratic.

I mean, yeah. Once the writers of the Constitution. And the organizers, you know, finished it. They were imprisoned, and/or executed right after. Because they were counterrevolutionaries. And, you know, you have to get rid of those people.

There were some people that were just too radical. And they were the writers of the Constitution. But, you know, that's an old dusty document.

Sure, it was written last week. But they didn't foresee everything.

So they started the great -- the great terror.

Is what it's called.

I don't know what happened during the great terror.

But it coincided with the signing of the new Constitution.

But everybody was protected. You could say whatever you want.

You know, you could look at the great terror, or the subcategory of the great purge.

And say, hey. You know what, they're stepping on those rights. There. Those people.

But they are people that the state really doesn't. You know, the state really needs some authority to be -- sure, you have a right to speak. You know, you have the enjoyment of rights and freedoms of citizens. But, I'm just quoting the Constitution, not to the detriment of the interests of society. Or the state.

So if you saw something, you know, like Ketanji -- whatever her name is. Jackson brown. Jackson -- whatever her name is.

I love her. And she is right.

When the state has an interesting, because the state knows best, then we have to, you know, restrain people from saying things. So let me just -- let me just quote article 39. Enjoyment of the rights and freedoms of citizens must not be to the detriment of the interests of society, or the state.

Amen! That's what she's saying. I mean, they've been saying this since 1936 in the Soviet Union. Article 59 obliged citizens to obey all the laws and comply with the standards of the socialist society as determined by the party. So if the party said, you know, let's just say, we can mutilate your children.

You can speak out about that. I mean, you're going to have to go to jail for it.

Because it will be a hate crime.

In fact, hate crimes were even mentioned specifically, in that 19 -- they were so far ahead.

They were just -- they were just way, way, way, way, way ahead. Because they were already on those hate crimes. You know, you don't have a -- you don't have a right to say, you know.

For instance, here it is. Quote, the Constitution prohibits incitement of hatred or hostility on any religious ground.

So you couldn't just, you know, say to the Bible. Bible says this.

If it incited hatred. So -- and the Constitution, you know, gave -- you have a freedom of conscience. You can do that.

You can profess or not profess any religion.

And you can conduct religious worship or atheistic propaganda. As long -- and I'm quoting. As long as it's in the interest of the state. You see.

Because they know better. They know better.

So Ketanji, I just -- I'm trying to help you. Because you asked for help yesterday. Which I find just so refreshing. That a talk show host, that is a recovering alcoholic and former DJ, who is just completely self-educated, you know, knows this stuff, better than a Supreme Court justice. But I think that's great, that, you know, you're humble enough to say, I don't know my ass from my elbow. I think that's great. I really do. I really do.

So let's just remember, the government, you know -- we have inalienable rights. What does that mean?

I don't know. Something about aliens from space, Ketanji. No.

Means no man can change those rights. Alter those rights. Or take away. That's what inalienable means.

And in the Soviet Union, they didn't that have, okay?

They didn't have inalienable rights. You as a citizen can, and I'm quoting. Enjoy rights. When the exercise of these rights, do not interfere with the interests of the state, and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, they alone have the power and authority to determine policies for the government and society.

What a utopia that is. Man, if we could just model our Constitution on something as open-minded as this, we would certainly be fixed. Kind of in the way, my dog was fixed. But we would be fixed all right.

How Israel’s Red Heifer Prophecy Explains What's Happening Right Now
RADIO

How Israel’s Red Heifer Prophecy Explains What's Happening Right Now

Does Hamas fear that Jews in Israel are trying to fulfill a Biblical prophecy? Glenn reviews a story from earlier this year that went under the radar: On the 100th day of the war between Israel and Hamas, a Hamas spokesman proclaimed that Israel’s aggression “reached its peak” with “the bringing of red cows” to the Holy Land. This, Glenn explains, is a reference to the red heifer prophecy, which some Christians and Jews believe will usher in the building of the third Jewish Temple and the End Times. So, is Israel preparing to retake the Temple Mount? And was this why Hamas attacked on Oct. 7th in the first place?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So back in January, a story flew under the radar, that is worth discussing, and it wasn't discussed because the mainstream media has no idea what this even means.

But at the 100-day mark of the war in Israel, October 7th. The military spokesman for Hamas, gave a televised speech, about the Hamas efforts. As well as the remain -- the reminder of the purpose, of the war.

Now, this was translated, into English, by the Palestinian chronicle. Which, gosh, I must have missed this issue of it.

And it just came to my attention. And I want to you to listen carefully to what this guy said.

Quote, we look back 100 days to remember the educated, the complicit, the incapacitated among the world powers, governed by the law of the jungle.

Reminding them of an aggression, that reached its peak against our path, al-Quds and Al-Aqsa. Al-Quds is the Muslim name for Jerusalem.
And Al-Aqsa is the mosque that is on top of the Temple Mount.

Reminding them of an aggression, that reached its peak against, translating, in Jerusalem. And the Temple Mount.

With the start of its actual temporal and spatial division, what?

They started -- it reached the peak, at the start of the Jews Jew's actual temporal and spatial division.

And, quoting, the bringing of red cows as an application of a detestable, religious myth. Designed for aggression, against the feelings of an entire nation in the heart of its Arab identity.

And the path of its prophet, and its ascension into heaven.

Hmm. What did you get out of that, Stu?

What -- the temporal and spatial division. What's that?

That sounds mystical, doesn't it?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And the bringing of red cows as an application of a detestable religious myth. Well, we should look in to what that is.

The bringing of red cows, as part of a detestable myth.

Okay. Red of hers, are the -- the detestable religious myth, according to the leader of Hamas. A red heifer in the Old Testament, to be sacrificed, has to have no more than two black or white hares.

And they check them. I'm guessing, there is a rabbi squad that goes out.

And they look, and they check the heifer, it has to be unblemished. All red hair.

And that's a one in 50,000 chance that your red heifer is going to be born like that.

And it cannot have more than two black or white hares. Even before having their ears tagged. A common practice with livestock.

That would disqualify them for ceremonial use.

But these four heifers remain blemish-free. And according to the temple institute rabbis. They want to carry out this detestable -- what did he call it?

Myth. And a ceremony. Before pass over.

So just before Easter.

Only nine heifers have been sacrificed since Moses.

Nine.

And that happened between Moses and the year 70 AD. And the feeling is, or the -- the myth of the Bible, is the tenth red heifer ceremony would bring in the Messianic Age.

Now, I don't know about you. But those people who are like, I think Jesus is coming soon!
(laughter)

They're so crazy.

So I don't believe any of that craziness.

Bit they're bringing in the Messianic age.

Now, people who are religious Christians, they believe that that is the first step to rebuilding the third temple.

And it has to be built, before the Antichrist comes and desecrates it.

Of course, I mean he wouldn't desecrate it, then they build it. But he's -- and then the Messiah comes.

Some of us believe that's Jesus. And he had a return ticket, when he came the first time.

So he's coming again.

Now, what does this mean, where did this come from?

Why is Hamas saying 100 days into the war, it was the transfer of these red heifers from Texas. To Israel. That played a role in October 7th?

GLENN: I've been to Israel several times. I have never been to the top of the Temple Mount, because I was asked by the state of Israel.

Not to go. I was asked by Benjamin Netanyahu, who was the Prime Minister at the time, when I was there last.

And they were worried about any appearance, on top of the Temple Mount, causing a stir because of, you know, I stand for Israel.

I've been recognized, et cetera, et cetera. I know people who have gone. Ben Shapiro just went. And he prayed on the Temple Mount. Praying on the Temple Mount as a Christian, but especially a Jew. Is not looked on kindly, by Muslims.

And, but many people, many people do it.

If you've never been to Israel. You don't understand the role of the Temple Mount itself.

We've been talking here last few minutes, about red heifers. Red heifers are important for a purification process that needs to be done before the Temple Mount needs to be restored.

And the temple can be rebuilt on it. This is something that Hamas, really, its charter came from.

This is a story that has not been really even heard in Israel.

Secular Israelis, probably not even aware or interested in the presence of the red heifers in Israel.

And if you're not religious, it probably means nothing to you.

However, Hamas has just pointed out, that -- that they are at least following the red heifer story, close enough. To use it as the stated reason to launch the surprise invasion.

And attack, that they called the Al-Aqsa flood. Al-Aqsa mosque.

The mosque is the third holiest site in Islam. This is where there was the mythical journey of -- of Muhammad. And he was brought from Mecca, to the Temple Mount, on some sort of donkey with wings.

And he went up, to heaven, and he received instruction on Islamic prayer. And then he returned back to Mecca, the next morning.

So that's the claim on the Temple Mount.

The Hamas terror attack on October 7th, is really the work of the guy that we've talked about on this program. The grand Mufti.

The grand mufti became in the 1920s, the father of radical Islam. That's what he's called. He was the first to bring up discussions about Al-Aqsa and the third temple

And bring it front and center. The Jewish people were immigrating and coming in the 1920s to Israel.

And Husseini, the grand mufti. He was able to spread his anti-Semitism, and the idea, that the Jews were coming, to destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque.

To rebuild the third temple.

The third temple, is instrumental. If the third temple is not rebuilt.

Then that stops the prophecy of the return of the messiah.

So it has to be rebuilt. How is that going to be happening with the Al-Aqsa mosque on top?

Don't know. Well, he got everybody wound up so much, it peaked in 1929. And they went on a terror raid, a lot like October 7th, on the Jewish holiday that commemorates the destruction of the two previous temples. So Jews were going to the western wall to pray. They were attacked by Arab Muslims. Under the grand mufti. Because he said they were going there to tear the Al-Aqsa mosque down. Lots of people were hurt and killed. The Jews. Because Al-Aqsa was in danger.

He -- this guy did not go away after this.

The grand mufti in 1937, was exiled from Jerusalem. And he sought asylum in a country, that thought a lot like him, in 1937.

He went to Berlin, Germany. Where he met with Adolf Hitler.

Helped form the Muslim SS squad, that was scooping up Jews. And he even hosted a radio show.

And he was talking about how much Islam, and the Nazis have in common.

So this is what they were marching about then. And this is why they are now saying, they are going after the Jews now.

You don't know, the Hamas charter is -- is widely accepted as one of the most anti-Semitic documents in history.

It lays out a direct call to annihilate the Jewish people. Along with promoting jihad, as the only solution, and a responsibility for every Muslim.

In fact, this is the grand mufti's ultimate solution, for protecting the Al-Aqsa mosque.

You have to kill all the Jews. To protect the mosque. Does it make a little more sense thousand?

That you see October 7th. The Al-Aqsa flood?

And this ideology. So in the 100-day speech, the 100 days after the war began. After October 7th. The statement from the Hamas spokesperson. Is the first statement directly to address the red heifers. Which came from Texas.

And are now in Israel.

He is now saying, that this is not just because of the red heifers, but because there are also Jewish people praying on the Temple Mount.

And a growing number of people praying, on the Temple Mount.

Early on the morning of October 7th, Hamas issued a statement, via the military commander. Who justified the attack as retaliation for Israel's desecration of the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem.

It wasn't just the heifers, but also prayer, Jewish prayer on the temple.

Which has been allowed. It's controversial, but it's allowed.

So the problem is: Is that Jewish people think that it has been desecrated by the Muslims. Muslims say, it's been desecrated by the Jews.

If you're going to rebuild the temple, you need to purify it.

And purifying it, according to the book of numbers, chapter 19, is a heifer. A red heifer ceremony. That results in the creation of ash and water mixture.

And that cleanses the entire nation of Israel. From ritual impurity.

And then the ceremony requires some of the blood to be sprinkled at the front of the tabernacle. That later became the temple.

It usually took place at the Mount of Olives, where they are planning on doing this again in the coming days.

It is essential for all aspects of the temple, and temple worship to take place.

In addition, anyone participating in temple worship, would be required to be sprinkled with the ash water.

Beyond that, even without the presence of a physical temple, the ceremony, would be -- would allow the general population to be ritually cleansed and remove much of the religious prohibition for a Jewish presence, on the Temple Mount.

When are they planning on doing it?

Well, they imported these red heifers before October 7th.

We now know that Hamas said, that this was going to -- this was part of the reason, because they're going to use the red heifers to purify the temple, which is desecration to them.

Purifying them, so they can then, actually, go up, and even if there's no temple. They can pray as if they were in the temple.

They're going to do this, passover weekend. So Easter weekend.

That may be a very violent weekend, in Israel. If we are to take Hamas at its words, that no media is reporting on.

You don't have to believe the red heifer thing.

I do.

I believe they believe it. And I believe that the third temple is part of the return of Christ. Or the come of the messiah.

And I look at these things, seriously.

Because I know the Middle East looks at them seriously. And I believe in the return of the Messiah.

We should be watchful. We are told, to look for these things.

And I think the best thing that we can do is pray. The best thing we can do is prepare ourselves, spiritually, temporally, physically, prepare for uncertain times.

I don't know if this happens. But I know people have been working on this to happen.

Well, since '70. And it looks like it could happen in the next couple of weeks.

The sacrifice of the tenth red heifer.