RADIODecember 15, 2023

DOJ CHARGING journalist who DEBUNKED its Jan 6 narrative?!

The Department of Justice and FBI have ordered Blaze Media investigative journalist to self-surrender himself for unknown reasons related to January 6th. Baker, who expects to be charged or even prevented from traveling to Washington D.C., joins Glenn to explain what he knows. Baker lays out why he believes the DOJ is retaliating against him for his reporting on the events of January 6th, which has exposed huge cracks in the government's narrative. Plus, he explains the story that he believes caused the DOJ to act.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. We have Steve Baker on the phone.

Blaze Media, investigative journalist, who has been looking into the January 6th debacle and has made massive headway.

And it's my understanding, that Steve and the team were up in Washington. Here in the last couple of weeks. I think some of them just got back yesterday.

Spent a lot of time with the January 6th footage.

Full access now. Because of Steve.

And some news stories are coming.

But what a surprise, Steve.

You were notified by the US Department of Justice.

STEVE: Yes. Good morning. That was a great good morning I had yesterday.

GLENN: I bet.

STEVE: Yeah. We're actually here right now.

I'm actually talking to you from the secure video room. At one of the congressional office buildings in DC. We have our Blaze guys right here right now. Working on the consoles. And we've been here all week.

We're not going to stop working. I'm not going to quit doing what I'm doing. And we will just move forward, regardless of what they throw at us.

GLENN: Hang on.

I want to hear what you are finding, if you can. Give us any kind of hint on what's next coming our way.

Tell me, what are you being charged with now?

STEVE: Well, they notified my attorney yesterday morning.

That I needed to self-present. Or self-surrender myself to Raleigh North Carolina.

On Tuesday or Thursday. Arrange for that to happen on Tuesday. When we ask for what the actual charges will be. We were told by the FBI agent, that he -- quote, unquote, didn't know. And that he wouldn't know, until the magistrate signed off on the warrant.

Now, they are telling us, that I'm going to just be processed.

And then released on my own recognizance.

I will not be detained. I will not be held overnight.

Then, of course, I will be subject to whatever the magistrate decides to put on me.

I don't know if that will include surrendering of my devices.

Because, again, we haven't seen the warrant.

I don't know if that's going to include a surrendering of my weapons. I don't know if that will include any gag orders of any types.

I don't know if that will include any prescriptions that will prevent me from traveling to DC.

That's usually what happens to the January 6 event. One of the first things they do, is they prevent travel to DC.

GLENN: What a surprise. What a surprise, Steve.

What a surprise. Have you downloaded to the rest of the team, so the work can continue?

Have you downloaded what you know, and what you're looking for?

So the rest of the team, can continue?

If you can't go in?

STEVE: We have multiple dead man switches. There's your answer to that.

GLENN: And, by the way, dead man switch. We know, Steve. He's not suicidal at all. At all.

And apparently, can't hang himself with paper sheets.

So he has that going for him.

Well, please keep us informed.

You have to surrender on Tuesday. I know TheBlaze will have stories next week on this.

Is there any doubt in your mind.

Because you were contacted by the Justice Department. What?

About six months after January 6th. Because you were there.

STEVE: That's correct.

Yeah, they contacted me in July of '21. I did my first -- my only FBI interview in August of '21.

We were notified by the Department of Justice a month later. The week before Thanksgiving.
In November of '21, we were told that I would be charged within the week at that time.

And then they developed off the map. We didn't hear from them, until 20 months later. Which was August of this year. When I got a subpoena, grand jury subpoena, for all of my January 6th videos.

GLENN: And what does your attorney think, this is -- that was about?

STEVE: Well, that was interesting. Because grand juries are not convened for misdemeanor charges. They're convened only for felony investigations.

Now, that doesn't mean. Because we don't know it. They won't tell us anything. Maybe they just wanted my video for somebody else's investigation.

Or maybe it was applicable to what they were looking at for me.

And then there's no assurance that even though, there was a grand jury looking at me or the videos, that they will apply a felony account.

Look, we can assure the world right now, because actually, one of our guys right here, is harvesting every second of me in the Capitol right now.

We're going to show the world in advance, long before this thing ever goes to trial or any such nonsense. That obviously at any point, at any time, when I was on campus, there was never any violence. Never any property damage. There was never any untoward behavior. I didn't wear Trump gear. I didn't parade. I wasn't carrying a flag.

GLENN: You didn't stand on a bench, did you? God forbid.

STEVE: I did do that. I did do that. There is a federal law against that.

GLENN: I know there is.

STEVE: So I may have to plea down to bench standing.

GLENN: But wait. You did that not as a protestor, as a journalist, to get a bird's eye view, right?

STEVE: Yes! That's exactly what I did. I got up and away from the crowd, so I could record what was going on. And that was in the crypt, below the rotunda, where I did that.

And so it's going to be an interesting presentation, well in advance of whatever the government is putting together. Because we will be able to lay it out, and show side by side. A

That there were 60 other journalists.

That we were aware of, that travel through the same breached doors.

And, of course, I didn't arrive until after several hundred people were in the Capitol.

There were 60 other journalists.

Many of whom went through those doors long before I did.

Or were at that initial breach, that have never been charged.

It really comes down to who they were submitting their stories and videos to at the time.

And obviously, you know, whatever -- whatever the narrative was. The headline of the story was, like the New Yorker story. With Luke Mogul said, among the insurrectionists -- well, then he probably got a Get Out of Jail Free card for that headline.

GLENN: Well, but wait a minute. But you had your video with HBO. They're not necessarily a flag waver of the right.

STEVE: Yeah. They licensed. They licensed my videos. New York Times licensed my videos. As did many other news agencies around the world.

That was through my agency.

GLENN: Okay. So can I ask you just a couple of Frank questions. Because we really just got to know each other recently.

And, you know, are you a hardened Nazi lover that is, I don't know, you know, burning crosses?

STU: You don't lead conversations with this question. You waited this long to ask.

GLENN: I know. I know.

We have gotten to a, are you a member of the Nazi part of our friendship yet?

STEVE: Glenn, I usually get dinner and a couple of drinks before I get asked questions like that.
(laughter)
No. Absolutely not. I am -- if you -- if you analyze my politics, I am what I refer to as a pragmatic Libertarian.

And I have never had any associations with any militias.

Any 3 percenters. Any Proud Boys.

Oath Keepers or otherwise.

And I have basically kept to myself. And kept to my musical career for most of my life.

As a trumpet player and a singer.

And my journalism was my side hustle, as they say, for 20, 25 years.

And that was accelerated when COVID came to town. And I was not allowed to work in the music business for a year and a half. So I moved my journalism. And my investigative research into the captain's chair of my life. And then January 6th happened.

So that became a primary focus of what I've been working on.

GLENN: Well, we are obviously going to be following your story. And every indication is that exactly what you've said. And as you say, our team is there, looking at all the video footage of you, right now.

To make sure that we have the story and can get it out.

But also, all the other things that you are looking into.

Can you give us a sneak peak into anything else you're working on for January 6th?

STEVE: Yeah. I can tell you, that we are continuing our stories on the Capitol Police.

There's a real focus there.

In fact, I don't have it -- a second's worth of hesitation to tell you, that the story that we came out with last Thursday. Friday. That directly showed Capitol Police cover-up in corruption.

At the highest level. Probably triggered this action from the DOJ.

GLENN: Go over that story, for anybody who didn't see it.

STEVE: Yeah. The story is a particular police officer, who we have been covering. Issued an anonymous letter on Capitol Police letterhead back in May of '21. It was highly partisan, highly political. Major violation of the Hatch Act.

Major violation of the Capitol Police rules and regulations for their officers. And he was prompted to write this letter.

It was a political screed against the Republicans, that were opposed to Nancy Pelosi's January 6th select committee.

And as a result of a prompting he got from Representative Raskin, of all people.

And that was a situation where he took Raskin's prompting, and went and created this letter.
And then also solicited help from the Capitol press pool. And then he had actually some female reporters in the press pool, assist him in crafting this anonymous letter.

And when this was released on May 19th and May 20th, it was discovered the next day.

Because the cop is not very bright. He used this Capitol Police email, and he used Capitol Police printers to print off hard copies. And so he was brought in, and his investigation began the next day.

And we revealed that not only did he initially lie about the action that he had taken, using Capitol Police resources at the time, to craft a highly partisan political anonymous letter, misrepresenting the department. That this was what would be called a terminable offense. He should have been fired on the spot. There's a problem with that, though, Glenn.

We're talking about Harry Dunn, the hero of January 6th as the media has put forth.

So rather than taking disciplinary action against him. The -- the Capitol Police spiked that report.

They let him off with a 530 warning.

Meaning, that was just a warning, just a slap on the wrist. Don't do that again Harry.

And he got by with it.

Rather than being an interminable event. He was not disciplined at all.

And therefore, was allowed to testify in those oath keeper trials.

And, of course, we know where that goes from there. So you see the he connectivity there.

GLENN: Go ahead. Go ahead.

STEVE: Just to finish that up. One of the things I've been able to do. Through sources over the past couple of years, I do have and have been able to capture some internal communications between oath keeper leadership. And we know that they are livid.

In fact, they -- on Friday's report, when I released the names involved. Harry Dunn. Representative Jamie Raskin, Whitney Wild from CNN, who participated in this.

GLENN: Jeez.

STEVE: Anonymous letter. When I put all this together and published that. The chief counsel for the Capitol Police, actually called me that Twitter guy, Steve baker.

For releasing this information. And so we're seeing. We're learning. We're knowing about these kinds of things that are happening.

And we know they are upset.

And his name is Ted -- I think it's -- it's Tobias or something like that.

He's the chief counsel. He's a former federal prosecutor. Former assistant US attorney.

And he works with the Department of Justice on these cases, related to January 6th. And so we're pretty sure, we don't -- we don't have to stretch this too far to imagine, that this is probably what triggered this action against me after two and a half years.

GLENN: Steve Baker, investigative journalist, Blaze Media contributor, and now famously that Twitter guy. Thank you for everything.

Steve, we will be following this obviously very closely. And good luck. Good luck. Stay safe, please.

STEVE: Will do. Thank you, Glenn.

GLENN: Got it. We'll keep you in our prayers.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.