RADIOJuly 30, 2024

WATCH: Democrats Parrot WEIRD New Attack Against JD Vance

The Democrats' propaganda machine sure is impressive, Glenn says. After turning on a dime from supporting President Biden to calling him old, and from criticizing VP Kamala Harris to praising her, they've done it again! This time, as if everyone received the same memo, they're all starting to call Trump's VP pick, JD Vance, "weird." But Glenn and Stu remind the Democrats who the weird ones really are ...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: It's weird, Stu.

Isn't this a weird day? What a weird day.

STU: It is so weird. These Republicans, have you noticed their policies. They're so weird.

GLENN: I have. They're weird.

STU: They're weird.

GLENN: You know what is really weird?

Is this montage, put together, that shows all of -- everybody in the media, and everybody on the left, suddenly calling J.D. Vance weird.

Here it is.

VOICE: Some of what he and his running mate are saying. But it's just plain weird.

VOICE: These guys are just weird. That's who they are.

VOICE: As weird and creepy as J.D. Vance.

VOICE: Super weird idea from J.D. Vance.

VOICE: Yeah, it's quite weird.

Just plain weird.

Just plain weird.

Just plain weird.

VOICE: That stuff is weird. They come across weird, and then they start being weird. Yeah, they're weird.

VOICE: Being really weird.

He's such a weirdo.

Donald Trump and his weirdo running mate are weird. Deeply and profoundly weird. They are weird.

These Republicans are just weird. It's just weird. It's really weird.

VOICE: Republican weirdness goes even deeper.

VOICE: He said a lot of things that are weird, a weird style that he brings. Weird policies.

VOICE: With the weird thing, because it is a thing.

VOICE: Just plain weird.

VOICE: What was weird was talking about Diet Mountain Dew. Who drinks Diet Mountain Dew?

VOICE: Whoever seen the guy laugh? That seems very weird to me that an adult, from over six and a half years being in the public life. If he has laughed, it's at someone, not with someone. That is weird behavior.

GLENN: Wow. Wow. Who -- who is writing the memos?

This is unbelievable coordination.

I mean, I stand in awe, at the -- the system, the left has built.

To where they can get everyone to walk in lockstep, overnight, Kamala Harris, is horrible.

She's the bores right now.

She is hated by everybody.

She can't keep anybody on her staff.

She is unlikable. Unworkable.

She's not the replacement, overnight. She's a genius.

She's a genius. You don't how great she is. Did you know that -- I mean, far from being revery busy, helping the president run the country every day.

She's also a marvelous cook. There's a story out in I think the New York Times today. About what a health addict she is.

And her -- I mean, you have to see her exercise routine. It is unbelievable!

They're all in lockstep. And, you know, I know that this is true. We know this is -- is the way it works.

But it is awesome, in its weirdness. Creepiness.

And, quite honestly, Orwellian way.

To watch this happen in realtime.

Now, let me tell you what I think they're doing. I think that they are very wisely changing the tone of the conversation.

And they're going with Kamala's weird laugh.
(laughter)
Isn't that great? He's just weird.

And they're trying to change the tone from a grumpy old man.

You're a danger to the democracy.

To, it's just weird, isn't it?

It's just weird.

They're trying to soften themselves from the possibility of being a fascist dictator, to just somebody like you. That just looks at things and goes, that's weird, isn't it?

Now, you may not do that. But they're also trying to make it a campaign for the -- the younger set.

You know, the those people that are well, weirdly younger.

I wouldn't -- I would not dismiss what they're doing right now. I think this is a this coupled with black women or white women for Kamala. Black men for Kamala. You know, one-legged Asians for Kamala.

I just -- I don't get it. Until you start to think, perhaps -- perhaps they are softening things, by almost mocked themselves.

That's the way. They're not. But I think they're trying to appear as though it's all tongue-in-cheek.

I think it's a good strategy if that's what they're doing. But it is -- it's awesome in its evilness to watch.

STU: It does seem like something like the white dudes for Kamala is a little bit tongue-in-cheek. They do seem to be playing that up a bit.

GLENN: Yes. They will be a party of fun. They will be a party of fun.

Remember, she said. And we'll have a lot of fun with this, aren't we, Barack?

That's what's happening.

STU: It's interesting, that you bring this up.

Because I had the same sort of thought yesterday. As I was watching the weird coverage.

And I think we're probably in the minority. Examine I think that most people just look at this on the right. And like, okay. They're trying this crazy stuff.

The only reason I would say, it's notable. Is that they've tried the same tactic on Donald Trump or so long.

It like global warming, increasing levels of doom. Right?

Every time you talk about Donald Trump. He's a fascist. He's a dictator. He's Hitler.

He will stop -- and they've tried so many times, this one-note strategy, against him. That I think trying anything different, is probably wise for them.

What they do now, it doesn't work, and Trump knows how to respond to it. This is a little bit different. And so far, it has been JD Vance on his heels saying, I'm not weird.

I swear. I like kids.

Oh, well, that's crazy. That's weird. That's nonsense. Especially with the stuff that they promote.

Obviously, it's crazy. But at least, maybe it's a little bit of a change-up from what they've done, every other day, for the past five years.

GLENN: Yeah. Because what you are -- what you are doing, is you're forcing the right into a schoolmarm position.

Oh, is that weird, that we like children? That we think families are good.

Well, you know what is weird, is the Paris Olympics with testicles popping out everywhere.

STU: Right. And it is weird.

GLENN: And you sound, even though you're accurate.

You sound like the schoolmarm. The happy warrior wins. I think that's their strangle.

STU: Right.

GLENN: I think that's their strategy. I think it could pay off.

STU: And it's a little bit -- again, I don't know that it works. Remember, this is a party that is losing.

Right? So trying something different is what you do in these moments. So I'm trying -- I don't want to oversell it, as if this is a brilliant strategy. I'm just saying, that changing here is probably wise. Not to mention it's one of those things you've talked about many times, of making your weakness your strength.

They are weird. What they want is weird! It's a very good descriptor of what they're trying to do to this country. It is very weird.

It is very strange. They're saying it in a way to stammer the attack against them. Everyone knows the fact that we just had a presidential campaign launch on RuPaul's Drag Race is weird.

That's weird.

Running -- pulling -- taking the candidate who won the nomination, and replacing him three months before an election.

Is weird. All of that stuff is weird.

But they're almost using it in a way to -- is that how they see it?

You think they're trying to disarm the attack that is obviously more applicable to them. Your question, yes. This isn't normal.

This is weird. You know this is weird.

This has not happened before.

It's -- none of this is -- is normal. And so they immediately turn can go, you know, he is weird. He's really weird.

Have you heard what they're saying? They're weird.

And they are bringing the temperature down, they are seeming like the fun people that they are. Because she didn't really talk about anything. She doesn't know what she's saying.

You know, the Venn diagrams. We're just having fun with this. That's all we're doing.

We're just like you. That's what's happening.

STU: And it's incredible.

GLENN: And it is. If that's what they're doing, I think it's brilliant.

And dangerous for the republic, because she is weird!

She is not normal. She is not a traditional candidate. There is no way that Kamala Harris could ever become president, unless you took her as the most unpopular candidate, in the race.

And you put her as the vice president, and then you had some guy who was so wildly incompetent, and so dangerous for the country. That you put her in. And you put her in, at the last minute, before anybody could really talk to her again. And refresh everybody's mind, who she is.

Give her very little rope, she's got very little time to offend everybody. And to do anything, but a soft shoe dance.

That's the only way you get her in, as president. No -- no one, no Democrat would elect her, if it started back last year, and she had debates.

It would never work. And now, you're going to be able to have the most -- she is more progressive, than Barack Obama.

I don't think she's more progressive than big Mike, but she's much more progressive than Barack Obama. She believes it to the core of her being.

And she -- she was raised by Berkeley professors. You know what is weird?

That is weird. The only way you can get her in, is in a very short time period, have her come in, when it's an emergency.

And everybody has to agree with her.

Make sure that you have the press in lockstep.

And just -- we're just having fun with this.

We're not taking -- you don't take that seriously.

Like, oh, I'm going to do that. Dangerous. Very dangerous for our side.

And I'm not saying she's going to win. I'm saying, don't take this lightly.

STU: It's a real threat to not only the candidacy. But also to the country.

GLENN: What happened with the G.O.P. convention? Why did everybody feel so good after that?

Because it was happy. And joyful. And that's something we haven't felt in a long time.

We're used to people saying, the worst things about one another when they come out with something like weird. That's just weird.

That's not offensive at all. And you can kind of laugh about it.

It is kind of weird, isn't it. You know, you're just so much like me.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.