RADIOMarch 31, 2022

Donald Trump Jr. gives America the AGENDA-FREE news we want

Sick and tired of news organizations deciding for you which stories are important and which opinions you should have? Well, so was Donald Trump Jr. So, he and his team developed a new way to read the news: MxM News. It’s an app that ‘cut[s] through the censorship, mainstream bias, and institutional dominance that has left society divided and misinformed.’ MxM News provides you with information from all kinds of sources — ones that sway to the left AND to the right. ‘We let people actually use their brains,’ Trump Jr. tells Glenn, ‘and, you know, make their own opinions.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Cofounder of MXM News, a new app that you should absolutely download and use. Donald Trump Jr. is on with us. Hey, Don, how are you?

DON: I'm doing well. Yourself?

GLENN: I'm doing great. I'm doing great. Thank you for this app, by the way. Tell people what it does exactly.

DON: My pleasure.

Well, MXM, like minute by minute, it's an app for people who actually want to see the news. Glenn, you have a lot of followers. I'm pretty sure that Apple's news algorithm has never shown anyone one of their stories that they want to --

GLENN: It used to be -- about ten years ago, it was pretty good. Now, nothing. Nothing.

DON: No. You'll never show up. Just like, you know, you maybe show up in my Twitter feed, 10 percent of the times you post.

GLENN: Correct. Correct.

DON: But 150 percent of CNN News shows up in my feed, whether I follow it or not.

GLENN: I know. I know.

DON: That's how the algorithm works. These stories, they do exist. The Hunter Biden laptop, people were writing about it. But the vast majority of America, did not see that story. We now know that 20 percent of Biden voters literally said they would not have voted for them, had they not voted about it. It was the cover of the New York Post. But big tech decided that no one saw that. Because it would hurt the odds of them forwarding their political agenda. So I said, you know what, enough is enough. I know people are writing these stories. I see it, but I spent all day looking at this stuff like you do. So we decided, a couple friends of mine. All super political guys, to come up with an app. Create an app. That will literally pluck from all stories. I mean, there's mainstream media in there as well, but you'll see the Glenn Beck stuff. You'll see stuff from TheBlaze. You'll see stuff from Breitbart. The stories that are being suppressed will also show up equally. So you can actually read about everything and then formulate your own opinion. That's what this was about. And we just saw that it literally didn't exist. The places were even conservatives were still getting their news. Were so heavily biased. The big hand of big tech was suppressing everything that they want to read. And we have to make sure that this stuff is out there, so that these disasters don't happen in the future. And until big tech decides to actually believe in free speech. And not censorship. And not controlling that type of message. Somebody will have to step up and do it.

GLENN: I will tell you, that this is so needed. And I appreciate the fact that you are putting in the mainstream sources, so you see it. I don't -- I want to read all of it. I want to choose, what to read, what not to read. You know what I mean?

CHIP: Yeah, 100 percent. I read four or five articles on a subject. I don't just take one as a gospel, because I'll always take out an extra point in something there. You know, you can see that bias, then when you actually -- oh, I didn't realize X, Y, Z. Right? You saw that with Kyle Rittenhouse. Oh, you know the people that he killed weren't African-Americans. I didn't know that. I was told he was a white supremacist, right? So you can see that bias. It really helps formulate your opinion. Literally, we created this app. It's totally free. You can download it for i Phone and Google. You know, if you don't like it, delete it. It's that simple. We're not asking for information or emails. We're literally just trying to make sure that people can have access to the news that exists, but they won't see elsewhere.

GLENN: So how do you do this? Is there an algorithm? Is this hand selected? How is this done?

DON: Right now. We literally have a team of guys going through all the sources. Picking the things that will be trending. They will show the diversity of both opinions. You know, mainstream as well as sort of the things that I still consider mainstream. I mean, I say you guys are mainstream based on simply the amount of following that you have.

GLENN: Correct.

DON: But no algorithm from the urine big tech suspects, is ever going to highlight that. It may show up. You'll get 10 percent of the following. It's like my Instagram feed. You know, 10 percent of the people who want to see my stuff, will maybe see it at best. Whereas I see stuff from people I don't even follow. And it magical shows up there, and every suggested follow is a Democrat politician, never a Republican, even though I don't know what would lead them to believe that I'm wanting to follow Bernie Sanders. But nonetheless, it's there.

(laughter)

GLENN: Yeah. I get the --

DON: They make it really easy for people -- honestly, you can just go to DonJr.com. Like at the top of my home page, just D-O-N-J-R.com, you see there -- you can click there. If you have Android, click the link there. It will take you right to the Android store. If you have the i Phone, it will take you right to the app and the i Phone store. It was leaving the downloaded app on Apple all weekend. Which was pretty cool for news and stuff like that. And so people are into it. It's a very simple platform. You choose the preferences of things that you want to see. And those are the things that will end up in your feed. And you will actually see the stories that you were missing all the time.

GLENN: Yeah. I'm looking. Business insider. TheBlaze. Politico. Associated Press. Breitbart. Rumble. TheBlaze. National Pulse. The Federalist. Daily Caller. The Hill. Daily Star. Bloomberg. Newsweek. You are covering -- you are covering the news.It not an agenda-driven thing. It seems to be a truth-driven thing, which is what we're lacking right now.

JASON: 100 percent. You know, there's no agenda behind it. We let people actually use their brains. And, you know, make their own opinions. And that's what it should be about. But it hasn't been for so long.

And, again, for so long, I use social for my news, but again, if I'm getting 90 percent of the other stuff in, I believed, based on the last five years. That, you know, I was working on Russia. I'm an agent of Russia. Based on the nonsense that's out there, not actually the truth.

So it's the kind of thing, literally in ten minutes, you could scroll through, and have all of the news from all of the sources, from all over the world, in one place. It's a great way to get educated quickly, without having to sort through the filter, without having to actively search the stuff that you would be looking for to maybe find the corollary opinion. So, yeah. We're pretty excited about it. And just trying to fight back against the nonsense that we've been seeing. I've been preaching about it for a long time. A lot of people were saying, build your own. So we did. We did.

GLENN: Don, I get a question all the time. What sites do we check? I check a million of them. But I follow one site done by an aggregator. He's got the best finger on the pulse for stories that I've ever seen. And most people don't even know about the website, it's called Spin Quark.

You should look that up for stories. Because it's a great selection of stories. Spin Quark.

DON: I'll check it out. Yeah, and this was really also in part to fill the void that Breitbart -- that Drudge left, and when Drudge sort of got -- I guess he sold and got woke. And the new guy is a liberal and all that stuff. But when you have the Drudge Report, that used to break big stories, now they won't even cover it, the Durham report. Mainstream media, talks zero seconds about Hunter Biden and the laptop. And, you know, now that they've got what they wanted, they can say, oh, yeah, I guess we were wrong, it wasn't really Russian disinformation, despite 200 intelligence officials, signing on to the letter, as though it's real, as though they had some information that it was Russian disinformation. You know, we're trying to cut out that nonsense.

Because there's plenty of it out there. You see it right now I'm sure with Russia and Ukraine. You know, I don't honestly know what to believe. Because I've been in the room for the last five years, as they've lied. As they've reported what happened in the room that I was in. And the true things have nothing to do with each other. They don't even resemble each other remotely. One is a messaging designed to derive a narrative, the other is what actually happened. And again, there doesn't have to be a correlation between the two anymore. And that's a shame. So we're trying to eliminate that.

GLENN: It's MXM, like minute by minute. MXM. You can get it wherever you get your apps. I highly recommend you download it and use it. It's a great way to stay in touch with the news, without the liberal algorithms telling you what you should read. Read it all. Read it all.

Don, I want to ask you a bit. Your dad said yesterday, that Russia should release what they have on Hunter Biden's, you know, bribes. What we think are bribes, and sure look like bribes.

Yesterday, also we found out the FBI, gee, what did I do with that Hunter Biden laptop? They don't know where it is.

Luckily, there are copies of it now, and it was entered in the Congressional Record, yesterday.

What is your -- what's your take on what's happening with not Hunter Biden, but how this will affect Joe Biden, because this story is about him think compromised?

DON: Yeah. And as this thing started weeks ago. I was like, hey, has anyone ever thought about maybe the fact that our response to the Russia Ukraine situation is totally misguided, because they're trying to cover up what they know still exists out there. That maybe we don't know about it. I mean, the FBI, who I guarantee you, has every text message to anyone who was within a 1500 mile radius of Washington, DC, on January 6th. Right? You're grandmother. They're spying on them. They haven't lost that text message. But they don't know where the Hunter Biden laptop is. Because, you know, it's just not that important, that Hunter was laundering money for Russian oligarchs, tied to human trafficking and sex trafficking rings.

And he was doing all sorts of shady business. That's not relevant to the FBI anymore, Glenn. That stuff doesn't matter. And that's just part of the swamp. And it's just totally acceptable. You know, again, if your grandmother took a selfie near the capital that week.

All right. She's in trouble. We're going to investigate her. I guarantee you, that they spent more time researching the garage pool door at Bubba Watson's supposed hate crime thing with Denmark, than they ever did looking into the Hunter Biden laptop.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

DON: This is a recurring pattern. These people and the leadership at the FBI is so corrupted. Imagine if it was my laptop. You think it would just go missing? Yeah, no, it would be exhibit A. It would be everywhere. It would be on the cover of every mainstream periodical in the country. It would be everywhere. It's Hunter Biden's -- now we know it's true. Now we know it's missing. These aren't coincidences, Glenn. These aren't stupid people. They may be biased. They may be partisan. But they're not stupid. They don't just lose these things. And, again, if it was about their political enemies, rather than the people who will get them their 10 percent in time, I guarantee you, it wouldn't be lost.

GLENN: We're talking to Donald Trump Jr. the cofounder of MXM. An app that you should download. Don, I have about a minute. A minute left. Can you just tell me. I mean, because when you look -- something is wrong with this war. Something is very, very wrong. The way Biden is playing this. It almost seems like he wants a really big war to happen. How much of -- of the Hunter Biden stuff do you think is playing a role, in what the president governor is saying about governor Putin, and the direction we seem to be moving in?

DON: Listen, I think it's pretty significant. Ukraine also -- there's not a country out there, that doesn't have a Hunter Biden laptop, or a clone thereof. I mean, all of our enemies seem to have a Hunter Biden laptop. The only people that don't have a Hunter Biden laptop are the FBI, because they lost it I guess.

So I guess I think our decision-making process is literally being done to protect Joe Biden. Hunter Biden. And their shady dealings abroad. And the fact that there is no one in the media, even questioning if that could be the case, is more scary, Glenn.

GLENN: Yeah. It is.

DON: Because it was sort of obvious. Right? He was doing all these deals for no reason, with no experience and millions of dollars, and yada, yada, yada. With both countries. And they're not even saying, hey, do you think maybe our response is biased, because of that? I mean, that to me is truly scary. I mean, literally has asked that question. I've been asking it for a month. I know if it was me. They would say, Trump is making this decision because he's compromised by this country. But Joe Biden is not? Give me a break. Is there anything in Joe Biden's history or Hunter Biden's history that would allow us to believe that they are taking the high road, and they're doing the right thing for the people of America? Like, we could be on the verge of World War III with Russia to cover up a Hunter Biden scam. We're going to send our kids over there to die, to protect a crackhead. Like are we out of our minds? And, again, the fact that no one is asking the question, makes it even scarier. But, again, you won't hear that reported. Which is a big reason why we created MXM News so that you can see it yourself.

GLENN: Thank you so much, Don. Appreciate it. We'll talk to you again. Our best to your family. God bless.

DON: Thanks a lot, Glenn. Be well.

GLENN: MXM is the name of the app. All right. Knowledge is power, but especially true right now.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.