Gas stove ban is latest ‘right-wing conspiracy’ PROVEN TRUE?

Remember when the far-left ridiculed conservatives concerning an alleged gas stove ban? Energy Secretary Granholm even said during an interview last month that the idea was ‘ridiculous.’ Well, it appears the rumors are not so ‘ridiculous’ anymore. In this clip, Glenn details new evidence that the gas stove ban WILL happen. But the far-left will go even further than banning certain kitchen appliances, Glenn says: ‘They're going to go for the total ban on gas…All of it. That is the goal.’


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let's just -- let's just look at a few things here. Do you remember the banning of gas stoves?

STU: The conspiracy theory?

Yeah. There was a huge conspiracy theory about that on the right, if I'm not mistaken.

They thought -- somehow they came up this wild idea, that suddenly, the government was going to try to ban gas stoves. This thing that had been cherished by every foody on the left, this entire time.

GLENN: Right. I know. This is -- this is CNN.

This is how they reported on it. They were kind of jokesters with it. The Biden administration has come under fire this week, due to an overcooked fear, that it is planning a nationwide ban on gas stoves.

STU: That's precious.

GLENN: The claim sparked by comments from consumer product safety commission official, published Monday.

That any option is on the table, when it comes to regulating gas stoves, amid growing health concerns over the appliances.

There is no growing health concern. None. None.


In the days after discussion online a vote, images of government dragging its four burner cook tops from homes, and social media users sharing memes of gas stoves with the text like, don't tread on me.

STU: Oh, those stupid people.

GLENN: Well, the White House said, it would not support a ban. And the commission and independent agency says, no such ban is in the works.

Okay. Well, apparently, you have to go in the way, way babbling machine, to remember a month ago, when they said, this was a conspiracy.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: An analysis published earlier this month, President Joe Biden's Energy Department acknowledged that roughly half of all gas stoves in the US market today, would not meet its proposed cooking appliance efficiency regulation. E&E News reports on Friday, as a result, these stoves would not be eligible to purchase, says the Energy Department.

Energy Department spokesperson Jeremy Ortiz dismissed concerns over the proposal, saying half the gas stoves would remain, if this standard is finalized as proposed.

STU: So only half of them would go away. Oh, that's -- first of all, not even worth commenting on. If only half of gas stoves would go away, that's a total conspiracy theory, to even bring it up.

GLENN: Right. Right.

STU: I assume that's exactly where it ends.

GLENN: Right. Well, the Energy Department's emission comes roughly a month after US consumer product safety commissioner Richard Trumka told a Biden appointee, said to people a gas stove ban was on the table. It's a hidden hazard!

STU: Wait.

GLENN: Any option is on the table.

STU: Wait. So that was --

GLENN: Products that can't be made safe, have to be banned.

STU: That was the genesis of the conspiracy theory, when the guy said it.

That seems like a pretty good conspiracy theory. When the person is actually saying the thing that the conspiracy theory is saying.

GLENN: Yeah.

Now, you were right, only half. Only half.

STU: You have the other half.

GLENN: But the association of home appliance manufacturers, is arguing, the proposed rule would prohibit a much larger proposition of gas stoves from being sold.

It's not even worth mentioning these people are crazy. You know, they've got some other agenda. You know, big cigar smoking types.

You know, the vice president who clearly smokes a cigar. Jill Notini pointed out to a December Energy Department test, of 21 gas stove models. All, but one of those models failed to meet the proposed rules' efficiency standards.

STU: So about half?


She says, that shows that it would nullify about 96 percent of the gas stove market.

STU: So you still have the other 4 percent?

What a gift from our government, and our betters. To allow us to still have that 4 percent. You know, and what a conspiracy theory it was, to say they would be banned. There's still 4 percent of them left. Ninety-six percent go away, but 4 percent remain for a limited time.

GLENN: Right.

STU: So it was a conspiracy theory. They were right.

GLENN: Right. And we're not sure about that 4 percent. But probably.

STU: Possibly, maybe.

GLENN: Now, this is just something that is just a growing concern.

This is not -- this is all organic.

STU: Oh, okay.

GLENN: You know, you pull back the curtain.

And you will you'll see three guys there, who founded rewiring America.

But that's just an environmental advocacy, dark money group.

You know, nothing to see there.

STU: Started from the grassroots.

GLENN: Well, not really. They're the ones behind the push to regulate and get rid of gas stoves.

And they seem to have a significant financial stake in the green energy push.

STU: What?

GLENN: Yeah. They started rewiring America. They funded rewiring America in 2020.

And they all pursued wind, solar, electrification. And energy efficiency ventures. So they put millions of dollars into this.

And if they can just put America off of all fossil fuels. They'll be rich. And they're hauling in all kinds of money. It is -- it's great.

STU: And maybe just moving the percentages to -- let's say half would go a long way to --

GLENN: Yeah. But imagine 94 percent.

You see, that's their goal. Their goal is to get us entirely on to electricity.

STU: And that's, of course, produced by elves.

GLENN: Of course. Yeah, yeah, you've seen the Keebler elves. They've stopped making cookies.

Sorry, guys. Stopped making cookies. Now making energy.

Now, there is another unfortunate story. You know, our electric grids, which are kind of shaky. To begin with.

They -- they can't connect to all of this green energy.

They -- they -- they won't have the -- they won't have the capacity for -- for doing that.

STU: Oh, no?

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

STU: When did we address that?

I would assume after we live -- how many years of darkness?

We turn off the fossil fuels.

Well, the local grid will not be at capacity, when we turn off the fossil fuels.

So it will be okay. But we won't produce enough energy for us, to actually live. Let alone power our cars.

STU: Yeah. If adjust our life slightly. You know, maybe we don't leave the house.

GLENN: A little bit. A little bit.

STU: And more clothing in the winter, you know what I mean?

GLENN: Yeah. Wear a sweater. That's very, very American. You know what I mean?

STU: Yeah, people love that sort of advice.

Is this, Glenn, to bring back an Obama era term, an example of stray voltage?

Do you remember this concept?

It was the idea that the Obama administration tested widely on us.

As experiments, where they -- they would intentionally introduce a concept that was wildly out of the conversation. Right? Gas stoves should be banned.

Knowing -- and, in fact, depending on the controversy that would ensue, when that was introduced. Everyone will be like, wait. What the heck are you talking about?

And what would typically happen -- and this is essentially a way for them to convince their own side of something they would not normally do. But what would happen is of course, people on the right, Obama's enemies. Would say, wait. What are you talking about?

That's crazy. This is what this administration wants to do. And we would all get up in arms. And just by nature, the left would take the opposite side of that.

GLENN: Right. Right.

STU: All of a sudden, you would go from 0 percent support of getting gas stoves out of homes. To 40 percent support. Because all of a sudden, everybody -- it's -- you know, people like Glenn Beck, who on the left, they may not be as fond of you, as so many of us are.

GLENN: Really?

STU: They would look at you and say, well, if Glenn Beck is taking that other side, there must be something to -- to this idea.

And while they're sitting there, denying it, the whole time, that they even came up with it, they wind up going from zero percent support, to 40 percent support.

And then over time, it becomes this argument made now with people like AOC. It actually is a big health concern. It actually should go away.

How come you don't know that? And over time, it builds and builds and builds. Until their policy they wanted the whole time, is actually in place.

GLENN: Okay. So that used to be called the Overton window. But the Overton window did something slightly different.

The Overton window is this concept that you have a spectrum of ideas. And the window is this sane area.

And somebody will say, we have to ban all gas stoves. That's nowhere in the spectrum of ideas. That the window is now showing.

It's so far over, that the window, can't even see it.

But the argument pushes that window, because people start arguing about gas stoves. And then eventually, you get half of gas stoves, banned.

And they get that as their wind.

That's not what's happening here.

Because they're going to go for the total ban on gas.

In this article, they are talking about gas dryers. Gas heaters.

All gas appliances, gone. All of it. All of it.

That is the goal.

And so, they -- they don't want just half of it.

They want all of it. What's happening now. And I don't even know what you call it.

I call it the Lewinsky.

And it's something that we've talked about on this program, many times.

It's what happened to Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.

The world is arguing -- the political world is arguing, he did it.

At the very beginning. And it's impeachable.

No. He didn't do it. He did it, and it's impeachable.

He didn't do it!

He did it, and it's impeachable. He didn't do it.

Then, after months of that, then the dress comes out.

And everybody now knows, he did it.

And the argument is, he did it, and it's impeachable.

Yeah. He did it, but it's no big deal.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Okay? That's what's happening.

STU: Uh-huh. Giving me flashbacks.

GLENN: Right. That's exactly what's happening.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Gas stoves are going to be banned. No, they're not.

Yes, they are.

No, they're not.

The next -- the very next argument is, gas stoves are being banned.

Yeah, they are. But they should be.

STU: Right. 100 percent.

GLENN: That's not an Overton window anymore.

STU: Stray voltage is a way to move the Overton window, so you get the Lewinsky.

GLENN: Is that what stray voltage is?

STU: I think you have heard it. We have talked about it years ago. It was something -- I think -- I want to say the first person I ever heard talk about it, was Major Garrett, who was talking about the Obama administration years and years ago.

And it was just this idea of introducing these things intentionally. You would think, the gas stove thing did not work short-term for the Biden administration. Right?

It was something rejected by a lot of people. Over half. It was not a close call. But it introduced it into the ecosphere.

And while they got that -- that pushback, initially, for the controversy on it. And they had to come out and deny it and do their dances.

Over a long period of time, they got a wind there. Because they will move the Overton window.

And all of a sudden, conversation is about, well, maybe we should be banning them. Let's look at the evidence. Let's bring that to the conversation. And eventually, it gets to the point where they say, yes! We do want them banned, and it's a good idea.

And that's essentially that movement that we talked about. This is a bunch of terms we're just combining here. It does work. This is what they do all the time.

GLENN: Yeah! It's what they did with socialism.

Remember? Newsweek. Was it Newsweek or U.S. News & World Report?

I remember distinctly, we did a story on it, on my Fox news show.

And it said, we're all socialists now. It was right after the election of Barack Obama.

And I held that up. And I said, they are admitting, that they are socialists. That we're all socialists now.

And the media went crazy. And called me a racist.

STU: A racist. Which doesn't make any sense.

GLENN: They don't deny socialism now. They don't deny it. It's what they were.

This is -- this is something so critical, that we -- it's why I'm asking you to call this hour. And just take a list.

I don't need to talk to them necessarily, on the air. But take a list of all of the things, people are calling about.

What are the things that they have said, the media and the government has said, is not true. For instance, we found out, that, oh, now the department of energy agrees with the FBI. That it looks like it was a lab leak.

All of the things that they have discredited and punished people. It's not that these things are -- are -- you know, just mistakes.

Oh, they got it wrong. People get things wrong all the time. We get things wrong.

This is things that they lied about, and punished anyone for saying.

And now, once they all start to become true, and they admit it, we have to hold those people responsible.

Because they have caused great damage and great pain.

And not just to the people, that canceled. But to the republic itself!

That has caused the division.

What is the division? We can't even agree on -- we can't even agree on vaccines. We can't even agree on -- no. We can't.

Why? Because you won't have a conversation about anything other than your way or the highway.

That's divisive. So when you're canceling people, because we're saying, hey, this is a problem.

And you cancel people, because they say that, and then later come back and go, yeah. That was right.

But -- but what?

Are you going to check yourself?

Are you changing your -- your -- the way you do business?

The way you look for truth?

They're not.

But we should.


How Should Christians FIGHT BACK Against the Rainbow Mafia? | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 188

Sometimes, the only way forward is backward. For instance, the modern obsession with “my personal truth.” The solution to this destructive force, according to author and podcast host Spencer Klavan, lies in ancient wisdom and the timeless question, “How is that working out for you?” Spencer joins Glenn to apply his expertise in classic literature and philosophy to the enigmas and culture wars of today, from the hubris of atheism to the rot of academia. And with a Ph.D. from Oxford, he knows a thing or two about academics. He walks Glenn through how the innovations of science have led to the religion of science, which in turn has bred horrors. He explains why he says, “Transgenderism is transhumanism.” And as a gay man, he responds to the destruction of truth in the name of people like him, including the possibility that Pride Month could be used to paint any dissenters as “Christian nationalists.” Spencer also walks Glenn through the big ideas in his latest book, “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises.” But, despite it all, there’s room for hope, he says. The decay of society may just be a great opportunity to make civilization better.


Glenn EXPLODES at Pro-Debt Republicans, ESG 'Politicization' & MSNBC LIES | Glenn TV | Ep 281

Democrats are behaving like spoiled children, demanding a limitless debt ceiling so they can spend uninhibitedly. On today's Friday Exclusive, Glenn demands that Republicans pick a side on whether they're okay with debt or not, and he reveals who's truly being held hostage as the debt crisis gets worse. Also, has the push for ESG hit its peak? Glenn reacts to the absurd notion that ESG has been "politicized" by conservatives. Lastly, Glenn tries to understand the new ways people can identify as lesbian ...


Video PROVES far-left crime policy is DESTROYING American cities

Recently posted video Kensington Avenue in Philadelphia provides a SHOCKING view of some of America’s most crime-ridden cities. In fact, homelessness, drug abuse, and more have become so out-of-hand, that even the bluest of Americans are taking a stand. In this clip, Glenn plays video of Oakland, California residents standing up to city officials for not doing anything to stop the crimes. Glenn explains that these videos PROVE the far-left’s policy on crime is destroying U.S. cities and that so many Americans are living in fear as a result of it all…


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me take you here. Let me show you the horror on the streets of Philadelphia.

Cut five. Now, I lived in Philadelphia, it was always not the best.
But this is --

STU: Less suboptimal.

GLENN: Less suboptimal. These people are zombies. They're just all drugged out. Laying in the streets. Or stooped over.

All in Philadelphia.

Now, let me show you something else. This is in Oakland.

This is people coming and speaking. This happened this week, in Oakland California.

Not exactly a -- a red part of California.

STU: It's not MAGA land.

GLENN: No. It's not MAGA land. So these are the Oakland residents that are coming to Oakland, to demand a change from the city.

Listen to this.

I'm Louise, owner of Studio Naga.

VOICE: I you in your office every week. (inaudible) I email everyone. And you know the situation.

Someone who is mentally deranged, in front of my business, who has threatened me multiple times. Who has threatened other people. Who has defecated on a property on our business. And I'm being told by macro that they can't do anything. I'm being told by police, that there has to be something in the middle.

As they said, I don't want to have to get threatened with sexual violence. I don't want my children to see this, as a normal behavior from an individual on the street. That they get.

He's naked. He's masturbated in front of them. He's urinated in front of them.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

VOICE: And there's nothing I'm told the police can do. So your policy of not enforcing some of this 150 feet from the school, 150 feet from the residences. That policy has a direct effect.

GLENN: Okay?

STU: Jeez.

GLENN: Can you imagine that? Can you imagine that?

Why are you paying taxes? What am I paying taxes for?

Okay. Listen to this. Crime change, cut two. Number seven.

VOICE: I understand. It comes from a place of hurt, generally when people are being violent. At some level, in some form, it's coming from a place of hurt. Sure. But if they're doing hundreds of gun point robberies mostly to women, to people of all races, where I've been in poverty my whole life, it makes it hard for us to keep job, to find jobs, to live life, to fight through mental health issues. To fight through our poverty. And it's not just one Democrat, and women. It's all kinds of women being targeted. This is systemic violence as well.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: So here's what I want to leave you with.

When you start to have conversations. Because all of the data points are there.

Before, when they were like, we'll reimagine the police. We're like, that's not going to work. That's the dumbest idea I've ever heard.


And that obviously, wasn't necessarily the best thing to say. But that's what was out of our mouths. I know it was my mouth at the time.

You are out of your mind?

Now all the data points are there. You show things like this.

And say, so let's talk about defunding the police. And saying, that the homeless, you know, can live anywhere they want. And all of this.

How is that working out for you?

Just ask them that. How is that working out?

Can we just look at -- can we just look at the facts? How is the city doing?

How is crime? How is crime, compared from a red city, to a blue city?

Is there anything we can learn from this? How is it working out?

And just be kind about it. But it's time we talk about facts. This is empirical evidence. This is how science is done.

I don't follow scientists. Because I know scientists can be wrong. I follow actual scientists. And that is, I have a theory.

I will now test it out, and I will look at the facts. So when they say, you just don't even know, you're a racist.

No. I'm following science. Here's how it works. You propose a theory.

I think police are making our cities racist. And they're -- they -- we would be safer, in the minority communities, if there weren't any police.


You said defund, because you want to reimagine.

Now we've done that in several cities. So let's look at those cities. Because if it was working and it was better. I would be with you.

I would change my mind. I don't want to be right.

I want to live in a great country, that treats everybody fairly. That -- that looks at everyone equally. Looks at people who are sick, and says, they're sick.

How can we help them?

I don't want to live in crime. And neither do you.

So how is that working out?

That's science.

STU: We did a show on Stu Does America, called Stu does the collapse of the American city. A couple weeks ago. And highlighted a station called old station subtraction in Phoenix.

Listen to this. This is their everyday. Everyday.

Sixty-nine-year-old owner, who opens a sub shop. It's been around for a while. This is his current situation. There are hundreds of people sleeping within a few blocks of Old Station. Most of them suffering from mental illness or substance abuse, as they lived out their private lives with public view of the restaurant.

They slept on Joe and Debbie's outdoor tables. Defecated on their back porch. Smoked methamphetamine in their parking lot. Washed clothes in their bathroom sink. Pilfered bread and gallon jars of pickles from the delivery trucks. Had sex on their patio. Masturbated within view of their employees. And lit fires for warmth that burned down palm trees and scared around customers.

Within a half mile of the restaurant, the police have been called to an average of eight incidents a day in 2022.

There are at least 1,097 calls for emergency medical help. 573 fights or assaults.

236 incidents of trespassing, 185 fires, 140 thefts, 125 armed robberies, thirteen sexual assaults, and four homicides. The remains of a 20 to 24-week-old fetus, 20 to 24-week-old fetus were burned and left next to a Dumpster in November. Two people were stabbed to death in their tents.

Sixteen others were found dead from overdoses, suicides, hypothermia, or excessive heat.

A group of young men in the encampment have begun selling off pieces of the public sidewalk, charging each person $20 a week for what they called lot rent and security.

That had seemed ridiculous, to an encampment resident, until he decided not to pay and then awoke one night to the smell of someone dowsing his tent with lighter fluid.

Then there was Kesha, barely out of her teens, who skittered around the encampment like a scared cat, wary of everyone. Carrying a few old dolls, and crying sometimes.

Joel had tried to watch out for her, offering her water, for a few minutes inside whenever she was upset.

But one weekend, when he wasn't around, the temperature was 115 degrees. She laid down on the curb near his gallery and died of heat exhaustion. Story after story after story of this.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

STU: This goes back to one of these court rulings where they said, of course it's okay to camp outside. That's okay.

Of course it is. So this has completely devastated. And this is the story of one sandwich shop. But this is repeating itself all over the country.

GLENN: So, you know, here's the thing.

We have to understand, that America is not all -- John Philip Sousa, marching bands, perfect military, and white picket fences. Okay?

We have to understand that. I never thought it was. I thought we were better than we are now.

I never thought it was. We've done some really bad things. I'm willing to admit that. I know at this point, you are too.

Because we've gone through this together. We've actually gone through soul-searching. The vast majority of Americans have changed. The vast majority of Americans on both sides have changed.

Now, we've changed because we've done soul-searching. And we went, yeah. Jeez. We really screwed things up. Boy, you know what. The liberals who were right about the companies, becoming the state, I didn't think that 20 years ago.

And they were right about the FBI. And the -- the spy apparatus in this country. They were right.

Okay. All right. Now, why do I say that?

Not because I'm forced to. But because I'm watching the evidence.

Nobody convinced me of that. The evidence is overwhelming. Now, while that evidence is coming out, and changing hard-core Republicans, hard-core conservatives.

Really pro-police. Pro-military. All of the things, that they've always hated.

As we're changing, because we see the facts. They're changing in spite of the facts.

And embracing the things they rejected. This is not logical.

It's just not logical.

And it's -- it's -- it won't endure.

And the further we get down this path. I'm reallying beginning to understand, the gods of the copybook headings. With terror and slaughter return. Is the last line. Of that Rudyard Kipling poem.

And I'm beginning to understand it. It doesn't just mean war. It doesn't mean, you'll have someone come in, and just right everything. We're experiencing the terror and slaughter right now.

We're experiencing it. How many people in this country, right now are living in fear. That weren't living in fear, ten years ago.

How many people who own a business in a town, live in fear of what the police won't or will do, of what's happening outside of their streets.

Anybody who says they're compassionate, and they heard what Stu just read, that's happening in Arizona. How do you claim compassion here?

How is this compassionate? You are not helping the lowest. You're enriching the rich right now.

You're not even -- you're not helping the millionaires. You're helping the billionaires.

You're empowering them. You're destroying so many lives, that are living on the streets, that are in the worst shape.

And how you are doing that?

By disregarding every known principle. There's a difference between facts. Facts can change.

Principles don't change. There's something that man has found to be true, over thousands of years.


The 1 REASON why the Russia & Ukraine War hasn’t become WW3

Is Vladimir Putin’s restraint the ONLY reason why the Russia & Ukraine War hasn’t yet evolved into World War 3? Because if the situation was different — as Glenn plays out in this clip — there’s a high probability the United States would currently be fighting a world war. So, with such high chances of escalation, why are yesterday’s anti-war Democrats suddenly fully on board? Glenn explains it all in this clip, adding that though Russia’s invasion was ‘abhorrent,’ it’s clear many in Washington are choosing to take advantage of the situation rather than make the right decisions for the U.S.’ overall safety and security…