RADIO

Glenn WARNS Tom Hanks AI FAKE is just the BEGINNING

Tom Hanks has warned his fans that a company is using an A.I. version of him to advertise a dental plan — without his consent. Glenn has been warning about this day for years — the day when you can no longer trust your eyes and ears. But it won't stop at fake Tom Hanks ads. What happens when artificial intelligence is used to create a scandal or crisis — Putin or Biden saying they'll launch nuclear missiles, Donald Trump admitting to something that never happened? "We are at the 'if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit' moment with A.I.," Glenn says. We are in a crisis of truth, but it's not just from A.I. The Biden administration is telling us the truth doesn't matter and Glenn has the receipts.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: If you do not have Dark Future yet. You need to read it. We can solve problems, if we understand what's coming our way. And it's coming our way quickly.

I've been talking you to about AI. And also, deepfakes for a while now. I've been telling you for, I don't even know, ten years. Look out. When this time comes, you won't be able to believe your eyes.

Tom Hanks has just come out yesterday, or the day before saying that there is an AI version of him, promoting some dental plan. And he said, that's not me. They did -- they didn't ask me to use my likeness or anything.

But it is an AI. Tom Hanks saying, hey, this dental plan is great. I'm Tom Hanks, take my word for it.

STU: Wow. And he had nothing to do with it. It's all AI.

GLENN: He had nothing to do with it. It's all AI.

When that happens -- when that happens in a scandal. If that happens when you see something that Putin said, about we're going to launch the missiles.

Or -- or Biden say, we're going to do something crazy. You --

STU: It's terrifying.

GLENN: You don't have time. It might not be really.

STU: And what percentage of people, would accept, if they saw a clip of Joe Biden or Donald Trump saying something that was totally fake. A good percentage of the opponents would just believe it, right?

GLENN: Here's where we are.

We are at the glove. If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.

We're at that point, with AI.

STU: What do you mean?

GLENN: The genetic code. We knew. We could take DNA samples. And narrow it down. Right?

And in the O.J. Simpson trial. They said, it's like 20 people maybe in the entire world, would have this DNA code that we could mistaken for one of 24, maximum.

STU: The science said, pretty clearly, he was guilty.

GLENN: Correct, but nobody knew what DNA was.

STU: Right. Right.

GLENN: Nobody knew what -- what that meant.

Now, we're at the same place, to where, some people will never believe something that is real, and always believe things that are fake.

STU: Right. Like people -- they're not at that point, where they are able to separation fiction in that realm.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: And some of it is so hard to tell, by the naked eye.

But at this point, we still sort of have institutions holding that line.

GLENN: Do we?

STU: Right? I don't know.

GLENN: The laptop isn't real. It's Russian disinformation. When it comes to politics, I don't think there is.

If it's political, if it's a dental thing.

STU: Yes, it's still there.

GLENN: But if it's a political thing, I don't think you could trust them.

STU: Let's just say, a fake video came out, of Donald Trump blurting out the N-word. Like, I would say, most of the liberal commentators, and many of the journalists, would -- would say it's true, for sure. And immediately, that would 100 percent be the reaction. But once it was discovered, it would be false. I think many of them would still kind of stick at this time.

GLENN: I think they would stick to it, and say, that's the way he would have acted.

STU: Or they'll say, the media -- what you're hearing. Who knows? They're probably trying to cover for Trump. Whatever.

Some way to make it seem like, yeah. Keep your mind open. Maybe it is true.

GLENN: This is why the truth matters in all of our life.

First of all, who is somebody you look up to? Try imagine a person. Something that you think, that's a person I can trust.

How many people can you come up with?

Okay. That's a problem. How many heroes do you have from the past, that you go, I'm comfortable with the history.

I understand it. I understand the good side, the bad side.

Nobody can take that apart on me.

I'm that confident I know who this person is.

You are probably that person to somebody else. Whether that's your kid. Your wife. Your husband.

A friend. You are probably that person.

And you just thought of how many people you can trust. When that person goes down, you have great grave, grave damage.

Grave damage. Because you've taken a little bit of hope in people away. Please, please, clean up your life. Tell the truth.

Just tell the truth all times. Tell the truth. I've said to you for years. People will not know what the truth is.

Well, people. I was wrong. I'm right that people don't know what the truth is. What I missed was, the whole society is telling you the truth doesn't matter. And it does matter.

Let me give you an example. The Biden administration secretly worried about corruption in Ukraine.

Just today. President Joe Biden's administration reportedly secretly worried about corruption in Ukraine. Despite putting on a brave face for the public, over the situation.

Politico obtained a confidential US strategy document, in which US officials discussing objectives they have for helping Ukraine, rooted out malfeasance and otherwise reform an array of Ukrainian sectors. The document warns that corruption in the country, could cause nations to pull their support from the country, as it battles the Russian military.

The report said, the administration wants to press Ukraine to cut graft, not least because US dollars are at stake.

The administration is reportedly concerned about being too loud about pressuring Ukraine to tackle its corruption.

Because they are worried that Republicans will use the issue to cut back spending. Use the issue? They would use the issue.

No. No.

The president should be concerned about your hard-earned money.

Everything -- everything that you have made, your entire life, or will make your entire life.

Every penny that you have put into Social Security and your taxes.

Every penny will not make a dent in one day of funding. To the Ukrainian people.

You've worked your whole life for that.

And they're just going to blow it?

How dare you. How dare you do that.

Are you more concerned about you, your special interests -- and I say this to Republicans and Democrats alike.

Are you worried more about you, your special interest, or what you think is important?

When your constituents say, no.

And if you're going to do it, can you at least do it responsibly.

Don't you have, even if you say, you know what, I'm sorry.

This is a representative republic.

So I am your representative.

I happen to -- you hired me to make the decisions for you.

And be informed.

And reflect you.

But you're wrong on this.

We have to do this.

Even if you believe that, don't they then have a responsibility to you, to do it effectively. And without corruption?

No. They don't take that seriously. What they take seriously, is the way it can politically backfire on them.

That's grotesque. Absolutely grotesque.

So now, we know that Joe Biden said, he went and fixed corruption over there. That he finally got the bad guy out.

When we've been saying, this is the most corrupt place ever.

He is so concerned about corruption, that during a war, when the Ukrainians are dying, he's worried that their politicians are so corrupt, they'll take the money, that should go to help them fight to keep their own country.

They'll take it, and waste it. They'll take it, and they'll keep it for themselves.

Wow. And you would send your son over there to do business, with the guy you know is one of the most ruthless oligarchs over there?

If my son was over there, first of all, he wouldn't be. But if my son was over there, and I knew he was with an oligarch who literally beheads people.

I would say son, no.

We don't work for him. You can take a job someplace -- do not work with that man.

That's the least I would say to him.

See, here's the thing. They say they care about democracy.

They don't. They care about controlling the votes.

That's nobody faces the machines. Nobody looked into the last election.

Nobody. Nobody. Nobody.

Nobody will actually pass anything, even though, we all, all of us, all of us, without getting political, about the last election. Or the next election. Just the election process. Do you want only people who are qualified to vote legally, be able to access the vote easily?

Do you want every legitimate vote counted, in a trustworthy situation?

I can't imagine that there is a -- a liberal, or a conservative, an independent, that would say, no to that.

You know who does?

Politicians who know how to work the system for themselves.

See, a democracy, a democracy is one man, one vote.

We don't have that. We don't have that.

Because the system is corrupt. But our Founders were smart enough to know, that it also doesn't work.

Because when the politician figures out, they can just give people money.

And that will make them vote for them. Then that politician is forever powerful. That's why we're supposed to have a representative government. A republic. So people can represent us, and say, no. You're being used over here. No. I'm sorry. That politician, no matter how much he gives you, should be stopped. We have such an important job to do. And this is not the time for sunshine patriots. This is the time, you were born for it. I hate to point it out. You were born for it. You're ready for it. If you're not, you should prepare. If you know our history, you know our Constitution, then have you thought about running for a position? I know that sucks. But have you thought about, there's so many racists now. That, Stu, just give me the Senate list, of the people that we have to have people running against.

STU: I mean, a couple names would be Roger Whittaker in Mississippi.

And Kevin Cramer in North Dakota. Both with very mediocre conservative voting records.

Both for election 2024.

There's no reason these people should not be primary.

You're going to win the state, if you win the primary. It's one of those type of situations. You don't have to worry about losing it. It's not like Maine.

Going against Susan Collins. Your primary winner might lose general. You're not going to lose either of those elections. Mitt Romney was the -- the number one target on this list. Luckily, he's retiring.

GLENN: Well, there would be a son of somebody, if it doesn't get in. It would be a son that runs.

STU: Please, you keep saying that. Please, stop saying that.

GLENN: I'm telling you, I think that's what will happen.

Anyway, you need to get involved. You need to stand up. And you need to say, at it people, retain. In Washington.

Who did this 45-day extension, with the CR.

So what are you doing today?

What are you doing today?

Bitching about it?

What is Kevin McCarthy doing today?

Is he actually moving forward on any of these things, where we're supposed to have passed, in 45 days?

If not, why the hell not?

TV

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

RADIO

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

RADIO

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

TV

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.