RADIOOctober 06, 2023

Glenn WARNS Tom Hanks AI FAKE is just the BEGINNING

Tom Hanks has warned his fans that a company is using an A.I. version of him to advertise a dental plan — without his consent. Glenn has been warning about this day for years — the day when you can no longer trust your eyes and ears. But it won't stop at fake Tom Hanks ads. What happens when artificial intelligence is used to create a scandal or crisis — Putin or Biden saying they'll launch nuclear missiles, Donald Trump admitting to something that never happened? "We are at the 'if the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit' moment with A.I.," Glenn says. We are in a crisis of truth, but it's not just from A.I. The Biden administration is telling us the truth doesn't matter and Glenn has the receipts.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: If you do not have Dark Future yet. You need to read it. We can solve problems, if we understand what's coming our way. And it's coming our way quickly.

I've been talking you to about AI. And also, deepfakes for a while now. I've been telling you for, I don't even know, ten years. Look out. When this time comes, you won't be able to believe your eyes.

Tom Hanks has just come out yesterday, or the day before saying that there is an AI version of him, promoting some dental plan. And he said, that's not me. They did -- they didn't ask me to use my likeness or anything.

But it is an AI. Tom Hanks saying, hey, this dental plan is great. I'm Tom Hanks, take my word for it.

STU: Wow. And he had nothing to do with it. It's all AI.

GLENN: He had nothing to do with it. It's all AI.

When that happens -- when that happens in a scandal. If that happens when you see something that Putin said, about we're going to launch the missiles.

Or -- or Biden say, we're going to do something crazy. You --

STU: It's terrifying.

GLENN: You don't have time. It might not be really.

STU: And what percentage of people, would accept, if they saw a clip of Joe Biden or Donald Trump saying something that was totally fake. A good percentage of the opponents would just believe it, right?

GLENN: Here's where we are.

We are at the glove. If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit.

We're at that point, with AI.

STU: What do you mean?

GLENN: The genetic code. We knew. We could take DNA samples. And narrow it down. Right?

And in the O.J. Simpson trial. They said, it's like 20 people maybe in the entire world, would have this DNA code that we could mistaken for one of 24, maximum.

STU: The science said, pretty clearly, he was guilty.

GLENN: Correct, but nobody knew what DNA was.

STU: Right. Right.

GLENN: Nobody knew what -- what that meant.

Now, we're at the same place, to where, some people will never believe something that is real, and always believe things that are fake.

STU: Right. Like people -- they're not at that point, where they are able to separation fiction in that realm.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: And some of it is so hard to tell, by the naked eye.

But at this point, we still sort of have institutions holding that line.

GLENN: Do we?

STU: Right? I don't know.

GLENN: The laptop isn't real. It's Russian disinformation. When it comes to politics, I don't think there is.

If it's political, if it's a dental thing.

STU: Yes, it's still there.

GLENN: But if it's a political thing, I don't think you could trust them.

STU: Let's just say, a fake video came out, of Donald Trump blurting out the N-word. Like, I would say, most of the liberal commentators, and many of the journalists, would -- would say it's true, for sure. And immediately, that would 100 percent be the reaction. But once it was discovered, it would be false. I think many of them would still kind of stick at this time.

GLENN: I think they would stick to it, and say, that's the way he would have acted.

STU: Or they'll say, the media -- what you're hearing. Who knows? They're probably trying to cover for Trump. Whatever.

Some way to make it seem like, yeah. Keep your mind open. Maybe it is true.

GLENN: This is why the truth matters in all of our life.

First of all, who is somebody you look up to? Try imagine a person. Something that you think, that's a person I can trust.

How many people can you come up with?

Okay. That's a problem. How many heroes do you have from the past, that you go, I'm comfortable with the history.

I understand it. I understand the good side, the bad side.

Nobody can take that apart on me.

I'm that confident I know who this person is.

You are probably that person to somebody else. Whether that's your kid. Your wife. Your husband.

A friend. You are probably that person.

And you just thought of how many people you can trust. When that person goes down, you have great grave, grave damage.

Grave damage. Because you've taken a little bit of hope in people away. Please, please, clean up your life. Tell the truth.

Just tell the truth all times. Tell the truth. I've said to you for years. People will not know what the truth is.

Well, people. I was wrong. I'm right that people don't know what the truth is. What I missed was, the whole society is telling you the truth doesn't matter. And it does matter.

Let me give you an example. The Biden administration secretly worried about corruption in Ukraine.

Just today. President Joe Biden's administration reportedly secretly worried about corruption in Ukraine. Despite putting on a brave face for the public, over the situation.

Politico obtained a confidential US strategy document, in which US officials discussing objectives they have for helping Ukraine, rooted out malfeasance and otherwise reform an array of Ukrainian sectors. The document warns that corruption in the country, could cause nations to pull their support from the country, as it battles the Russian military.

The report said, the administration wants to press Ukraine to cut graft, not least because US dollars are at stake.

The administration is reportedly concerned about being too loud about pressuring Ukraine to tackle its corruption.

Because they are worried that Republicans will use the issue to cut back spending. Use the issue? They would use the issue.

No. No.

The president should be concerned about your hard-earned money.

Everything -- everything that you have made, your entire life, or will make your entire life.

Every penny that you have put into Social Security and your taxes.

Every penny will not make a dent in one day of funding. To the Ukrainian people.

You've worked your whole life for that.

And they're just going to blow it?

How dare you. How dare you do that.

Are you more concerned about you, your special interests -- and I say this to Republicans and Democrats alike.

Are you worried more about you, your special interest, or what you think is important?

When your constituents say, no.

And if you're going to do it, can you at least do it responsibly.

Don't you have, even if you say, you know what, I'm sorry.

This is a representative republic.

So I am your representative.

I happen to -- you hired me to make the decisions for you.

And be informed.

And reflect you.

But you're wrong on this.

We have to do this.

Even if you believe that, don't they then have a responsibility to you, to do it effectively. And without corruption?

No. They don't take that seriously. What they take seriously, is the way it can politically backfire on them.

That's grotesque. Absolutely grotesque.

So now, we know that Joe Biden said, he went and fixed corruption over there. That he finally got the bad guy out.

When we've been saying, this is the most corrupt place ever.

He is so concerned about corruption, that during a war, when the Ukrainians are dying, he's worried that their politicians are so corrupt, they'll take the money, that should go to help them fight to keep their own country.

They'll take it, and waste it. They'll take it, and they'll keep it for themselves.

Wow. And you would send your son over there to do business, with the guy you know is one of the most ruthless oligarchs over there?

If my son was over there, first of all, he wouldn't be. But if my son was over there, and I knew he was with an oligarch who literally beheads people.

I would say son, no.

We don't work for him. You can take a job someplace -- do not work with that man.

That's the least I would say to him.

See, here's the thing. They say they care about democracy.

They don't. They care about controlling the votes.

That's nobody faces the machines. Nobody looked into the last election.

Nobody. Nobody. Nobody.

Nobody will actually pass anything, even though, we all, all of us, all of us, without getting political, about the last election. Or the next election. Just the election process. Do you want only people who are qualified to vote legally, be able to access the vote easily?

Do you want every legitimate vote counted, in a trustworthy situation?

I can't imagine that there is a -- a liberal, or a conservative, an independent, that would say, no to that.

You know who does?

Politicians who know how to work the system for themselves.

See, a democracy, a democracy is one man, one vote.

We don't have that. We don't have that.

Because the system is corrupt. But our Founders were smart enough to know, that it also doesn't work.

Because when the politician figures out, they can just give people money.

And that will make them vote for them. Then that politician is forever powerful. That's why we're supposed to have a representative government. A republic. So people can represent us, and say, no. You're being used over here. No. I'm sorry. That politician, no matter how much he gives you, should be stopped. We have such an important job to do. And this is not the time for sunshine patriots. This is the time, you were born for it. I hate to point it out. You were born for it. You're ready for it. If you're not, you should prepare. If you know our history, you know our Constitution, then have you thought about running for a position? I know that sucks. But have you thought about, there's so many racists now. That, Stu, just give me the Senate list, of the people that we have to have people running against.

STU: I mean, a couple names would be Roger Whittaker in Mississippi.

And Kevin Cramer in North Dakota. Both with very mediocre conservative voting records.

Both for election 2024.

There's no reason these people should not be primary.

You're going to win the state, if you win the primary. It's one of those type of situations. You don't have to worry about losing it. It's not like Maine.

Going against Susan Collins. Your primary winner might lose general. You're not going to lose either of those elections. Mitt Romney was the -- the number one target on this list. Luckily, he's retiring.

GLENN: Well, there would be a son of somebody, if it doesn't get in. It would be a son that runs.

STU: Please, you keep saying that. Please, stop saying that.

GLENN: I'm telling you, I think that's what will happen.

Anyway, you need to get involved. You need to stand up. And you need to say, at it people, retain. In Washington.

Who did this 45-day extension, with the CR.

So what are you doing today?

What are you doing today?

Bitching about it?

What is Kevin McCarthy doing today?

Is he actually moving forward on any of these things, where we're supposed to have passed, in 45 days?

If not, why the hell not?

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.