RADIOJanuary 11, 2023

How TERRIFYING new ESG rules will transform the ENTIRE WORLD

ESG is here, and now, it could fundamentally transform the entire Western World OVERNIGHT. New ESG reporting rules from the European Union (EU) will affect nearly every major American corporation — meaning YOUR life likely will fundamentally change as well. In this clip, Glenn is joined by The Heartland Institute’s Justin Haskins to discuss these new standards. Together, they explain how the EU's plan will affect U.S. businesses, how it will affect YOUR life, and why — when it comes to the transformation of society — this is the MOST IMPORTANT story, period...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: ESG. It's the scoring system. It's about ton codified in the EU. And here's how this is going to affect you.

They're about -- I can't remember what the standard is. But there's about 15 companies that will fall under this umbrella. Ford is one. McDonald's is another one.

JUSTIN: Oh, it's way more than that.

GLENN: American companies.

JUSTIN: Oh, yeah, yeah.

We're talking probably at least hundreds, probably thousands of --

GLENN: I only saw about 15.

Okay. So here's what -- here's how this is going to affect.

If you read the first book, The Great Reset. You know that one of its -- one of its benefits to the other side, the dark side, is it has tentacles. Everywhere.

And the -- the insidious part of it, is it just doesn't affect the company. It affects everyone in the chain of that company. So every -- every company that drives a truck for that company. They're delivering the goods.

Everybody that makes a widget for that company. Makes paper for that company.

Whatever it is. Every single company must be part of the ESG program, or they cannot do business with them.

Now, just -- let's just imagine McDonald's. And this is coming. Because Europe is adopting the ESG standards.

JUSTIN: As law, mandatory. Yes.

GLENN: So every company, that does business in Europe, will have to adhere to those standards.

So think about McDonald's.

Every corporation. Every company. Every mom and pop farmer that grows potatoes or meat, will have to they're to the EU standards.

Otherwise, you'll lose McDonald's.

But it's not just that you have to grow they believe the way they want grown. And on top of the their, you know, environmental and social justice standards.

But even the potato farmer, anyone who supplies him, also has to abide by ESG standards. The tentacles of this thing, will change America, just because we do business with the EU.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes.

This is a fundamental transformation of the entire Western World, of all of Europe, Canada, and the United States. Essentially, overnight.

They've already moved it through. There's sort of three bodies in the European Union, that are involved in lawmaking.

And it's already been approved by all three of them, in some degree. Right now, they're just trying to figure out, how do we reconcile our slight differences?

I've looked at all of them. They're all basically the same, with just small changes.

You're exactly right.

The way it works, is large companies that operate in Europe, which is basically the vast majority of companies in the United States have a certain amount of revenue in Europe. That means they have to adhere to the ESG system. Which means they have to impose it on everyone in their entire supply chain globally, no matter who they are, where they work, how large they are, et cetera.

GLENN: And if they don't have an ESG score for that company, because the company is like, I'm not doing it. They cannot buy the products.

So the score has to be done in America.

It has to be done, or you can't do business with -- for instance, Ford.

Ford doesn't make all of the parts to everything. Ford doesn't make the rubber. Doesn't make the radios. Doesn't make the seats.

All of that is outsourced.

If -- if that company wants to continue to work with Ford, then they must have a score. They must be EU. ESG compliant. And every company they work with, also -- so you're buying leather from somebody. You're making seats.

That leather company, if that leather is working with a farmer, to get the raw leather, that farmer has to ESG compliant.

JUSTIN: Yeah.

You can just be the transportation company, that transports the leather to the factory. That's part of the supply chain.

And so Europe isn't going to be imposing the rules on those people. They're going to be imposing it on Ford.

And then Ford will impose it on all of these people down the supply chain. They will have no choice.

GLENN: They will have to.

JUSTIN: And what they'll do, is they'll reach out to all their suppliers. And we have -- we know the examples of this happening.

I just had a lawmaker tell me this yesterday or the day before. They know of specific examples of this already starting to occur.

But you'll have these big companies. They'll go to the smaller ones.

And they say, how many electric cars do you have? How many this?

They have a whole survey of questions.

And then depending on how you answer it, they'll say, okay. Well, if you want to keep doing business with us, you'll have to improve X, Y, and Z. Otherwise, you can't do business with us anymore.

And that's all from this entire -- because it goes up the supply chain.

Somebody at the top, whether it's the European Union at some point in the future, or it's BlackRock who owns most of the shares of the company. Or whatever it is. Someone is saying, you have to enforce this all the way down the line. So this is not just about Ford. This is not just about McDonald's. It is about every other part of the economy, that is going to get wrapped up in this.

And by the time you count up all the different companies, and you go down the chain of every big company in America, that's going to be forced to adhere to this in Europe. Because it's only big countries, 150 million euros, revenue in Europe.

That are going to be forced to adhere to the specific European Union version of this.

But by the time you count them all up, and you go down their supply chains. It's basically everybody.

There's almost no one who will be caught up in this. And that's the whole point. That's the point.

That's why they're doing this. So this is, in my opinion, even though, you're not going to hear this story everywhere. You have to listen to shows like this to hear it. You have to listen to Glenn Beck and the Blaze and things like that.

But in my opinion, this is the most important story period. If you're talking about transforming society. This is the story.

GLENN: Yeah. It is. Because we've only told you half of it. We've just told you half of the story.

Let me give you the other half.

Same story, but there's even more that is going to be affected in 60 seconds.
(music)
What do you say, gold, silver? Yes, please. Yes, please.

Go back and listen. If you when I said any of today's radio podcast, make sure you go back and listen to hour number one.

I talked about what is coming. We are at the point now, where there are no good options for the fed.

You either have to print money, or you have to make things very, very painful. To stop inflation. They're not going to -- they're not going to do that. They're not going to suck the money back in. Because the stock market will just collapse. So they'll just inflate the money. And if -- you know, if they go to other way, it's the same. We now -- we now have the end of the petrodollar. Saudi Arabia and Russia. They're saying, you know, you don't need to use a dollar anymore. To buy oil.

Well, that's what we never counting on. So at least half of the world, will say, I have to get rid of my dollars. Okay?

Because I don't need they believe anymore.

What that will do to inflation, is staggering. Please, there are five or six states now. And find out if yours. Five or six states, that are -- are verifying that gold is a currency, it's already in our -- the US Constitution. It is money.

It's not a note. It's money. But they are taking away some of the things likable -- you know, charging to change it into US dollars. Or to be able to use it in stores.

Gold or silver.

Please, consider some of your money in gold or silver. With every tube of the new quarter ounce Mayflower gold commemorative. You will receive 100 of the same Mayflower copper rounds at no additional cost. Don't wait. Call 866GOLDLINE. 866GOLDLINE. Or Goldline.com. Ten-second station ID.
(music)
So correct me if I'm wrong, but here's the other shoe.

This goes up and down. The supply chain. So you -- let's say you're a Nestle. Which is a giant European company. They buy something from America, to put into their products. That means, the American companies have to change.

This also means every bank that wants to do business, in Europe, has got to be on board, with ESG.

Every bank.

JUSTIN: So interestingly, the most recent version draft of this, put a carve-out, for financial institutions.

GLENN: Thank God.

JUSTIN: And -- but -- but they said, we will allow individual countries in the European Union, to decide, if they're going to enforce that for their company's based in that country.

GLENN: Of course, the banks aren't going to be hurt by any of this. They're going to love all this.

JUSTIN: Of course.

GLENN: But the other shoe is that when Nestle sells, you can't sell to countries. Companies. Et cetera. Et cetera.

That don't have a high ESG. You're not supposed to buy or sell.

JUSTIN: If you're part of the supply chain in any way, at all. Then yes. Now, if you're a customer, they've now tried to change it so that, because then the original one, it was even -- you have to look at your customers, essentially.

GLENN: Right. But if I about it to, let's say I'm providing chocolate milk. I'm Nestle. And I will provide chocolate milk for all the vending machines and all the hospitals. That would supply to ESG standards, would it not?

STU: For individuals.

GLENN: Yeah. For the hospital. Big bulkily buyers.

JUSTIN: I believe so. But it depends on the version. And that's one of the things they're arguing about.

GLENN: That just God.

JUSTIN: Yeah. Because of exactly what you're saying. But in the most radical version of it, which was proposed by the European parliament. Which is really one of the most important parts of this. They wanted, it's the most far-reaching version. It would be, the banks would be included in it.

It would be up and down the supply chain.

GLENN: And the only reason why they won't do that. Is because they need people to buy European products.

They don't care if you're going to sell them stuff to make products, as much as buy the products. Please, buy the products.

Or it will be a complete collapse of their economy. It will end up as a collapse. And total control, of your entire life.

Where you live, what you eat, where you work, how you work. All of it.

All of it. And it's about to be passed in the EU.

JUSTIN: Yes. And this is just -- this is really important for people to understand. As bad as all of that is, it's actually worse.

It's actually worse.

GLENN: See, this is why we're having a hard time naming this book. Because it really is. It's worse than you think.

JUSTIN: It's worse. Because imagine now, all of these issues and concerns we have, but you're 20 years into the future. Or ten years into the future, even.

And now you have all of this new technology, that has been from the very beginning of its development. Embedded with all of this ESG stuff. Right from the very beginning.

You know, imagine what the world would be like, if the internet had been designed with ESG. From the start. And that's the only internet we've ever known.

GLENN: Zero freedom.

JUSTIN: That's what all the technology in the future is being embedded with. That's what the great narrative is all about. Really, that's what the book is going to focus on.

And that's the next part of all of this. And that's the most terrifying aspect of this. You want to taken your life changing. Not think able to escape. Every part -- everything you used to know, just disappearing. It's going -- it's going to happen, if we don't stop it.

GLENN: Buy hardbound copies of books, and preserve things. Really, sincerely.

We'll talk more about this tonight, at 9:00 p.m. on Blaze TV. It's my Wednesday night special.

You do not want to miss tonight.

It is all about control. And it's called -- tonight's special, is called farmland's wars. The global takeover of America's land. It's much, much more than that.

Get it at 9 o'clock, only on Blaze TV. Or if you are not a member of Blaze TV, you can go to YouTube. My YouTube channel. YouTube.com/GlennBeck. And you'll get it at 9:30.

We'll start rolling it out. Live at 9:00 for Blaze. 9:30 on YouTube.

Don't know what they're going to do with it.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.