RADIOAugust 23, 2022

Journalist BANNED from Twitter IMMEDIATELY after FBI tweet

Paul Sperry, senior staff writer at RealClearInvestigations.com, tells Glenn he was ‘in the middle of tweeting about the [FBI] raid’ when he received a message from Twitter informing him of his ‘permanent’ suspension. ‘They canceled my account without any explanation,’ Sperry says, which actually violates Twitter’s own rules. So are Twitter bigwigs — with connections to the FBI — trying to help the federal government? What IS going on at the FBI, and are good agents willing to stand? Plus, what specifically did Sperry say about the raid at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home before his suspension began? He and Glenn discuss it all, plus more, in this clip…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: We have Paul Sperry on with us now. Hello, Paul, how are you?

PAUL: Hey, how are you? Good.

GLENN: Good.

Paul is a senior staff writer at RealClearInvestigations.com. Columnist also at the New York Post.

And he is also a Hoover Institution Media fellow. We have him on, because tomorrow night's special -- Wednesday night special is a weaponized government. How the Mar-a-Lago raid is an attack on all of us. So Paul, what was it that Twitter found so offensive about -- about your reporting.

PAUL: Well, that's still a mystery. They kicked me off the day after Trump's home was raided. And I was in the middle of tweeting more about the raid. And then suddenly, I got a message that popped up, saying, you have been permanently suspended.

GLENN: Permanently. Wow.

PAUL: Yeah. No reasons given. Didn't say what rules and policies I allegedly violated to prop that. Yeah. So they canceled my account without any explanation. Which is, by the way, a violation of their own rules. Because if you look them up, they're supposed to, quote, explain which policy you may have violated. Which content. And which content was in violation. And they did not do that in my case. Because they know I didn't break any rules.

GLENN: Yeah. So isn't one of the guys at Twitter, isn't he a former FBI high-ranking guy?

PAUL: Yeah. The deputy of general counsel is the -- the Comeys. Jim Comey. His former general counsel of FBI headquarters. His name is James baker. So he was disgraced after the -- the FISA warrant abuse scandal. He left.

And then Twitter picked him up. And now he is --

GLENN: Jeez.

PAUL: I'm sure. I'm sure. Screening any matters -- any content-based matters that have a legal issue. Something like that. Would be a run-up to him. And so he has a lot of influence at Twitter.

GLENN: Do you have any idea if he's the one who banned you?

PAUL: No idea.

GLENN: Yeah. They're kind of a black hole of information, isn't it?

So talk to me a little bit about -- because I'm really concerned about the FBI, and the whole government. Right now, government agents have a bigger -- I don't even know what you would call it. A police than we have marines. That's a little staggering.

PAUL: Yeah. It's -- it's getting -- getting crazy out there. I mean, this -- it also had gotten very personal between the former president and the FBI. You know, this is -- like a full-blown war between the ex-president of the United States and the federal police. You know, when does that ever happen?

GLENN: Never. That I -- that I know of.

So how concerned are you? I mean, are you hearing from good FBI agents and enough of them to give you confidence, that at least the -- the average rank and file is not involved in this, and won't put up with this? Or what is your feeling?

PAUL: Well, a lot of them aren't putting up with it. There's been a number of whistle-blowers, that have come out to senator Grassley recently. So they're getting fed up with the politicization of the bureau. And unfortunately, the same FBI division that ran the corrupt Russia gate operation. And, by the way, coddled Hillary and Hunter and those investigations.

So they ran the questionable Trump raid, and they're now running what appears to be Russiagate 2.0.

GLENN: Jeez.

PAUL: It's the counterintelligence division in Washington.

Even though, it's the focus of special counsel Durham's investigation of that prior corruption.

GLENN: I -- I talked to John Solomon yesterday, and he said that he was -- he was fairly confident, that these documents still exist. He's trying to get them from the national archives. Copies of them.

But he wasn't quite sure, what documents they were really looking for. Do you have any idea on that?

PAUL: Well, some former FBI and DOJ official say, they suspect that the FBI may have used their raid to cover their tracks in the Russia gate scandal. They may have been trying to deep six any evidence that Trump found on them. In other words,, you know, Trump may have had proof of their crimes. And they had to make sure that that proof never saw the light of day. It's a pretty -- it's a fairly reasonable assumption. That they're sifting -- sifting through those boxes, to look for that information. That would have a vested interest, especially if they're under investigation.

Criminally by Durham right now, to make sure those documents, if Trump had them do not become public.

GLENN: And is it true that Biden was signing an order saying, we're not going to release these things? And, you know, his -- his order to release and to make them public, is rescinded. To ever which it's my understanding, that's never happened before.

PAUL: Yeah. Yeah. When AG Garland came in. The Justice Department. Put the kibosh in that declassification order.

GLENN: And it was the last -- literally, the last hour of his presidency, wasn't it, that they pulled them?

PAUL: Right. Right.

And so they -- they have their own road map. They know what was in that binder. And they -- they want to make sure that there's not some copies in the seven books that they pulled out of Mar-a-Lago.

By the way, careful reading of -- of that warrant shows basically that the warrant basically allowed the agents to take anything they wanted from Trump's home. So no telling what they got. And what they're going to do with it. And how they're going to use it against Trump. Because it looks like it was a complete phishing expedition. And, by the way, that -- that belies what we got in that press conference from the attorney general.

He said that he told everybody, that the investigation was narrowly focused. And the search warrant was narrowly scoped.

GLENN: Not even. It was a general warrant.

PAUL: Yeah. The release of that warrant shows that he misled the pun, and acted -- so that already gives anybody, including most of all Trump, pause. Skepticism to believe that their current assurances that the affidavit, which is the document that supports -- that allegedly supports probable cause of a crime being committed, to a warrant, such as a raid in the search, was properly supported. You know, you have the whole track record. The FBI, just completely acting dishonestly. And unethically, in swearing out warrants for FISA courts. Surveillance on one of Trump's advisers.

GLENN: So Trump is not a dumb, stupid man. He is not. He plays three-dimensional chess at times. He might appear to be flying by the seat of his pants. And I think sometimes he is. But he's smart enough to -- if he has those documents, not just leave them in a box. He would have copied them or given a copy to his attorneys. Or some place for safekeeping.

Is -- would that be illegal?

PAUL: No. You know, he -- he had skiffs set up for him, in Bedminster. His place in Bedminster and also Mar-a-Lago.

People don't record this. But he was very careful, whenever he would go to these homes. You know, second White House homes like every president.

The secret Service built under the direction of the Intelligence Community sense of compartmented information facilities within his residences. And that's where he would receive his presidential briefings. He would store classified documents in there.

So this whole notion that he's this reckless guy, he's screwing around, you know, top secret, national secrets, nuclear secrets everywhere. That's BS because he had skiffs set up. This was all done, just like every other president has had done in their secondary homes

GLENN: How concerned are you, or when does this end? What will it take for this to end? The solution between the government and, for instance, Twitter or others. Where the government we now know, has told people, clearly, at Twitter, you really need to do something about this person.

What is it going to take? This is such an end run against our Constitution, these public/private partnerships with these media companies, and with social media.

Do you see a way to stop that?

PAUL: Well, you're right. These gatekeepers in big tech have so much power over our free speech these days.

And you would have to have somebody like Elon Musk, a very deep-pocketed billionaire to kind of come in and take over. Which doesn't look good now, especially with this latest cyber security, whistle-blower coming out. And saying, there was a lot more fake accounts than they let on. So that kind of strengthens Musk's case to back out of the deal. It's not very hopeful for guys like me, who, you know, are political prisoners locked in jail.

GLENN: Right.

PAUL: But, you know, someone like that, would have to get in there, and get rid of Twitter's new CEO. This guy, you know, he -- he wants to focus -- he actually was caught saying, that he wants to focus less on free speech, and more on, quote, choosing who can be heard, especially in election years, apparently.

GLENN: Good God.

PAUL: So, yeah. That's the guy who is running this thing. He's an Indian fellow.

I forget -- I think it's Pickram or something like that. You know, it starts from the top. And guys like that, you know, they're mostly very liberal Democrats, who are running Twitter, including their board. And so that's what it would take. Put some fair-minded people in there, who respect and love free speech. I'm not saying a conservative way, or another. And I think music would be someone like that. Because he really does want a free-for-all. On a social media platform. He doesn't want to skew things --

GLENN: One way or another.

PAUL: Right. Right. That's how it should be, inciting violence. You put it out there. And it's up to the people to decide how they want to be. Leave it up to the debate. And eventually, the truth will percolate up through -- through free debate.

And that's not what the current Twitter powers that be, want. They want -- like this guy said, we want to choose who can be heard, and who can shape our political narrative the best. And people who are running fact-based content like me. And fact-driven content, that is inconvenient to that narrative. They don't want on their platform.

GLENN: Well, for now, you can find Paul Sperry at realclearinvestigations.com. That's real clear investigations.com. Paul, thank you so much. God bless. Keep us up-to-date, will you?

PAUL: Thanks, Glenn.

GLENN: You bet, buh-bye.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.