RADIOApril 21, 2022

THIS is why 'Libs of TikTok' creator was DOXXED by the left

The creator of Libs of TikTok — a social media account that aggregates far-left videos posted on TikTok — recently was doxxed by Washington Post report Taylor Lorenz (who, ironically, recently sobbed on MSNBC about her own harrowing experiences with haters). There’s a reason incidences like these keep happening, Glenn explains, even to private citizens who have done NOTHING wrong: It’s the only way our ‘authoritarian state’ can clamp down on all those who SUCCESSFULLY oppose it: ‘This is intimidation, period.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: If you don't use TikTok, good for you. I mean that sincerely. All hail you.

TikTok is a -- is a -- is a Chinese tool, I think just to just dumb us down. But I digress.

There is -- there is not the censorship on TikTok, that there is elsewhere.

And somebody has really done a great job at exposing the craziness, that is the fringe of the liberal party. I can't say that.

You know, what was fringe, we're now living. So I don't know what fringe is in the -- on the left anymore. I have no idea what fringe is.

But the creator has now come under attack. And I want to play just a little bit of something she said yesterday, as she is being doxxed and exposed, and her address is given out, online. Here's what she said.

VOICE: How has this affected your life, this Jeff Bezos piece?

VOICE: Well, the past few days have been very chaotic and overwhelming. I had to make some travel plans, you know, really fast. But I was not planning on earlier, so there was a little bit of coordination that had to happen. And I'm now, in a location, where I don't think anyone would find me. I'm not in any of the locations that there were leaks, or that anyone can find.

But I -- it's been a little bit tough. But I'm not going to let this set me down.

GLENN: So her friends and people who know her, say, she's not going to stop. This is not going to -- it will frighten her. It will scare her. Because they're coming after her. And these people will be violent. You know, they always say, the right is so violent. Show it to us. Show it to us.

The left, I could show you boatloads of evidence, that you're violent. So all she's doing on this, TikTok, it's the Libs of TikTok. All she does is take things that are on TikTok. She doesn't edit them out of context or anything else. She just takes the post, and she reposts it in one place. And now conservatives go to Libs of TikTok. And they see what she's saying. Let me give you two of the videos she posted. This is video number one.

VOICE: This video is to teach students about gender and sexuality. First up, we have sex assigned at birth. This is what the doctor says you are, when you come out of the womb. Should be based on chromosomes, hormones, and genitals. Next up, we have gender identity, which is totally different from sex assigned at birth. This is what you feel you are inside, and no one can see this from the outside. There are three different sliders that you can move up and down to describe your gender identity. Then you have gender expression, which is how you show your gender to the world. It's usually based on a sort of binary system, which isn't perfect. Again, you can slide this up and down to show the different gendered ways you express yourself. Then we jump down to attraction. We have physical attraction and emotional attraction. These are different. And there are sliders that a person can use to best describe their sexuality.

GLENN: All right. So this is done with a big cartoon unicorn and everything. This is for our kids. That's a teacher explaining, showing the curriculum, what's happening. Instead of teaching addition, we are teaching attraction.

Bet the Chinese aren't doing that.

Now, this is a first grade classroom. This is a -- from a teacher in a charter school, in Boston.

Again, from the Libs of TikTok. Listen to this.

VOICE: And something cool about me, Ms. Ammon. All right. So something that is really cool and unique about who I am, is that I am transgender. So we touched a little bit about that in the beginning of this week, in the book that Ms. Hammond read. But I'm going to give you my explanation of what it means to be transgender as well. So when babies are born, the doctor looks at them, and they make a guess about whether a baby is a boy or a girl, based on what they look like. And most of the time, that guess is 100 percent correct. There are no issues whatsoever. And -- but sometimes, the doctor is wrong. The doctor makes an incorrect guess. When the doctor makes a correct guess. That's what a person is called cisgender. When a doctor's guess is wrong, that's when they're transgender. So I'm a man. But when I was a baby, the doctors told my parents, I was a girl. So my parents gave me a name, that girls typically have. They bought me clothes that girls typically wear. And until I was 18 years old, everyone thought I was a girl. And this was super, super uncomfortable for me. Because I knew that wasn't right.

GLENN: Hmm. I didn't know the doctors guess. Did you know that?

STU: No. I could have thought they had some information based on science, that they were making -- that they were recording. But, no. I guess it's just a spin of the wheel.

GLENN: I guess we don't follow the science.

STU: No. No. It's just a guess.

GLENN: So the reason why I bring this up. This is all this woman does. She's not taking people out of context. She's just playing that on her channel, Libs of TikTok.

STU: And those are the more serious examples. A lot of them are funny. Just laughing at the oddities in our world. We all have them. Some have more than others.

GLENN: But nobody is on candid camera. They posted these to TikTok.

STU: Right. That's really important. As far as I know, and correct me if I'm wrong, Glenn, she's not going into someone who has their account set as private and lifting their account.

GLENN: No. She's just going through and being a human algorithm.

STU: Yeah. These are the things I find interesting. Look at what liberals are saying to each other.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: In this world. And they admit quite a bit, when they're bragging to their friends about how much typically they are owning conservatives.

GLENN: Correct.

STU: They are doing this to brag.

GLENN: So here's the thing: The -- Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post. The Washington Post through Taylor Lorenz, has doxxed the woman, that has the Libs of TikTok. Doxxed her. She's a regular person. She's only -- all she's doing is being a human aggregator. That's it.

But apparently, Taylor Lorenz, who I think is psychotic. She has had a psychotic break. Because she has been crying on NBC, complaining about threats and online bullying that she claims has targeted her. And she said, it is so destructive, and has destroyed my life. And made me feel unsafe. If there's just one piece of information that comes out about me, well, she then goes to the Washington Post, and exposes the woman behind Libs of TikTok's address and everything. Now, they're saying they didn't do that. But, yes, they did. They posted a real estate license, with the woman's address on it. Oh, I didn't see the address. Bullcrap, you didn't see the address. And the only reason why this is happening, is because Libs of TikTok is successful. People actually watch it. And laugh. And that cannot be tolerated, in an authoritarian state. You do not make fun of authoritarians. You don't.

That's the only reason why this is happening. This is intimidation, period.

STU: They want to just extract consequence. They wanted pain. They wanted a price. If you were going to make our movement look bad, then you're going to pay personally, in -- in fear, in harm to your career. In intimidation. In whatever form it is.

You will have to pay a price, for being successful, against liberals. Against progressives. Against the far left. Against The Great Reset. You will -- they have to extract a price for it. There's no other reason to do this. BS, they didn't know the address was there. In fact, they're not even saying that. They're not saying, we miss the address. They're saying, we didn't do it at all. They're just memory holing the entire experience. When everyone saw the link to the real estate license, with the address on the page. They're just acting as if it didn't occur.

That's their plan, right now, the Washington Post. And it's completely -- it's embarrassing. This is -- this is not 1997, where Taylor Lorenz was crying about a piece of information, out about her, who is a public figure. A reporter. And everyone knows her name. Now she's actually trying to justify outing someone, who isn't a public figure, who doesn't have their name public. What does that do to her life? She knows exactly what it does. She was just crying and sobbing about it, on MSNBC a couple weeks ago. And to have this disconnect shows real struggles dealing with reality.

GLENN: Oh, a psychotic break. A true psychotic break. She is -- I don't know -- she is a danger possibly to her own self. She is to others. She has now demonstrated that she is not living in reality. And she is a danger to others.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: That's a reason that, you know, they keep you at the hospital.

She said, she was dealing with massive PTSD.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: She said she was mentally just exhausted. This was two weeks ago. And she understands the consequences of all this.

Then she goes to work with Jeff Bezos. And she does exactly what she said, caused her breakdown.

That's somebody who needs help. I mean, that -- I don't want to get into the world of diagnosing people. And committing people, to insane asylums. But she is a danger to others. And she is not making any sense.

She is doing what she just said, should never be done.

STU: And it's a much worse version, than what happened to her.

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

STU: The fact that she's taking someone whose identity is not known and making it known is a really big line, and taking somebody who is not a public figure and making them into a public figure, is a big difference.

Taylor Lorenz, of course, she's dealt with criticism online. She's an online reporter for all of the major papers in our country basically. She's at the top two: New York Times and Washington Post. Right?

She's been -- she's been at the center of this debate for a while. And, of course, yes, she has received criticism, much of it fair. Some of it unfair. I'm sure some of it was terrible. I'm sure we've received terrible, abusive things said to us, all the time. It's part of being a public figure in the United States. It's not a good thing. No one should do that to her. However, what she's talking about here, she said, this is what reporters do. Of course, people who are antagonistic towards her. And are a little bit aggressive are going to go to all of her friends and all of her family, and do these things. Show up at their door. And we've seen some of it already. She's already complaining about some of it happening already. Well, you're the one normalizing this behavior.

This is insanity. It should not happen. And, you know, she tweeted yesterday: She said, rather than debate doxxing, I hope people can read the story and see the striking escalation of attacks against gay and trans people, and the crucial role this account has played in the right-wing media ecosystem.

Well, look, I read the story. That would have been the debate, if you didn't name the person and give out their address. Right? That would have been the debate. People would have been saying, well, is this account highlighting people who are going through difficult times, and maybe shouldn't -- shouldn't be highlighted? I don't know. You could have that conversation.

GLENN: And you know what is so crazy, is I'm not debating that that guy felt, you know, he was a girl, and felt like he's now a he. Or whatever. I wasn't even debating that. What I'm debating on that TikTok video, the last one we played. Is you're saying that doctors are guessing?

STU: Are guessing.

GLENN: That's the thing, and you're saying it to first graders. That's the controversial part for me. I'm so past the, oh. He's a dude. He was a girl. Huh.

I mean, I don't really care. When I'm on TikTok, I don't really care, what you say you are.

STU: And such a strange thing, where they separate this. When it comes to gender and sex.

You know, this has been their defense, right? When you say, wait a minute. We know what sex is. Everyone knows. Well, this is a different thing. It's the feeling you have inside. Look, maybe it's the feeling you have inside. But your feelings about what you have inside, are completely unimportant to me.

I don't care what your feelings are. Your feelings make no difference to society. You can have all the feelings. You can be -- you can cry at hallmark movies or not. I don't care what your feelings are. Your feelings might be important to you. They might be important to your family. They might even be important to the first grader's family who you are teaching. But they are unimportant to society in general. You can feel like a boy or girl, however you want. Whenever you want. But what you are, is important to society. What you feel like you are, isn't. That's important to you and your personal life. You do that all you want. But what is actually important to society and to doctors, who need to know whether you might be pregnant or not, is what you are! That's the important thing.

SHOCK POLL: The % of Young People Who Support SOCIALISM is Insane

New polling reveals a shocking truth: young Americans aren’t just open to socialism... they overwhelmingly want a socialist president in 2028. Glenn Beck and Justin Haskins break down five alarming surveys showing massive ideological shifts among voters ages 18-39, including young Republicans. Why is socialism exploding in popularity, and what does this mean for the future of America? Are we on the brink of a political transformation or potentially even a national crisis?

Watch This FULL Episode of 'Glenn TV' HERE

Property Taxes are OUT OF CONTROL - And Here's Why! | Guest: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott

Texas Governor Greg Abbott joins Glenn Beck to expose why Texans are being crushed by skyrocketing property taxes — and how local governments, not the state, keep driving homeowners deeper into financial distress. Gov. Abbott breaks down his five-point plan to impose strict spending limits, force voter approval for tax hikes, reform out-of-control appraisals, empower citizens to slash taxes themselves, and eliminate school district property taxes for homeowners altogether. Glenn argues that property tax is morally wrong because it prevents Texans from ever truly owning their land, and Abbott lays out his strategy to fight both parties in the legislature to finally deliver lasting relief.

Joe Rogan & Glenn AGREE: We just got CLOSER to civil war

Joe Rogan recently warned that we may have gotten to Step 7 of 9 in the lead-up to civil war. Glenn reviews the 9 Steps and explains why he believes Rogan nailed this one. But Glenn also lays out what Americans MUST do to reverse this trend...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So if you take what Fetterman said yesterday about how people are cheering for him to die on the left, and then you couple it with something that was on the Joe Rogan show on Tuesday. He was saying that the reaction to the death of Charlie Kirk makes him think that the US is closer to Civil War than -- than he thought.

Now, let me quote him. He said, after the Charlie Kirk thing. I'm like, oh, my.

We might be at seven. This might be he step seven on the way to a bona fide Civil War. Charlie Kirk gets shot, and people are celebrating.

Like, whoa. Whoa. Whoa.

You want people to die that you disagree with?

Where are we now on the scale of Civil War?

Well, let me go over the scale of Civil War, because it's sobering.

Now, none of this has to be true. If we wake up and decide, I don't want to do this anymore!

Okay?

Here's step one.

Step one. Loss of civic trust.

Every civil conflict begins when people stop believing that the system is fair. Are we there?

We're so far -- we're so far past the doorway, we are comfortably asleep on the couch on this one. Gallup and Pew both show trust in Congress, the media courts, and the FBI government are now at record lows.

The Edelman Trust Barometer classifies the US now as severely polarized. Majority of Republicans distrust federal elections. Majority of Democrats don't trust the Supreme Court.

Americans are really united on one thing, and that is the other side is corrupt!

When faith in the rules collapses, the republic begins to wobble. But that's step one. Step two, polarization hardens into identity!

Political disagreement is normal!

Identity conflict is fatal!

But that's what Marxists push. Identity politics. This is when politics stopped being about policy, and started being about who you are as a person.

Have we crossed this one into step two?

I mean, we're neck deep into this. A study on this, from PRRI.

It's a survey, found 23 percent of Americans believe political violence may be necessary to save the that I guess.

I think that's an old study. Americans now sort themselves by ZIP code into ideological enclaves. The big sort: Universities, activists, corporations. Everybody is promoting oppressor versus oppressed.

And that -- does what?

It puts us into incompatible tribes. Opponents aren't wrong anymore. The opponent is dangerous!

If I go back and you look at civil wars, Lebanon, before 1975. Yugoslavia, before 1991. That's -- we're doing that. Okay?

Step three. Breakdown of the gatekeepers. The gatekeepers are kind of like the referees of society. It's the media, political parties, churches, civic leaders.

When they fail, extremism fills the vacuum. Okay. Where are we on this? Have our gatekeepers failed us?

Yeah. I think both parties, especially the left, you know, everything I predicted that the left was going to be eaten by the extreme left, and then the communists and the socialists is now happening.

They've lost control of the fringe of each party. Media transformed, you know, from referees into team coaches. Tech platforms. It's outrage for profit. Universities are not there to cool things down. They heat them up.

Churches. Churches are useless. Useless.

When the referees leave the field, the game devolves into a brawl. And the refs are gone off the field. So there are only nine steps. We're at step four. Here's step four.

Are you ready for this one?

Parallel information realities.

Civil wars don't require different opinions. They require different realities.

I remember reading about Germany, at the beginning of, you know, the Nazi era. How the two new newspapers. One was propaganda for the government.

And the other one, it was the last one that was kind of the holdout.

And they said, you could read them, and they would cover the same thing.

But they had almost no information was the same. Except, that happened yesterday.

Here's what they said. And then everything else was different. That's exactly -- I mean, step four is complete!

We can't agree on facts, right?

Crime rates. Border numbers. Inflation. Election security.

Two Americans can watch the same video. And see opposite truths.

Social media algorithms are creating customized political universes.

Digital echo chambers. Deepfakes. We're just at the beginning of that. And both sides accuse the other of running disinformation machines.

Why? Because we don't have a shared reality. So if you don't have a shared reality. How do you settle any dispute?

On the nine steps, we're up to number five. Coming in at number five.

Loss of neutral rule of law.

This out of the nine steps with, five is the pivot point.

It's not corruption, it's the belief that the law is no longer neutral.

Are we there yet?

Let me tell you the CBS you.gov poll. 67 percent say the justice system is used for political purposes.

I think that's low. January 6 defendants given years in prison, 2020 rioters were released. High profile political figures, prosecuted or shielded based on party.

FBI whistle-blowers alleging pressure to inflate domestic extremism numbers. States like Texas, directly defying federal directives, on border enforcement.

And now, leading the way, with the federal government.

History is really cold and unforgiving on this point.

Once the people believe justice is political! Remember, this is the turning point.

The republic stands on borrowed time. Once you no longer believe that justice is achievable. Step six.

Are we there?

I think we are.

Step six. Normalization of political violence!

This is where violence stops shocking the system. Are we there?

Remember, where violence stops shocking the system. Look at evidence just from Virginia. What they just voted for.

He was calling for the death of a -- a political opposition.

Calling for his children to be killed.

Was called on it, never apologized.

Never said anything other than, yeah. I know. He dug it deeper.

Was anyone shocked by it? Apparently not. They elected him. Here's the evidence. 2020 riots.
574 events. $2 billion in damage. Was anybody outraged by that? Or was it downplayed and excused?
Assassination attempts. Assassination attempts against the president. Supreme Court justice.

Fistfights. And mob actions on college campuses. To silence speakers. Rising to do for punching a fascist or stopping genocide. Depending on the ideology. Online chatter discussing Civil War, national divorce, and revolution.

When violence becomes part of the political language, a nation crosses an invisible line. We're now up to step seven out of nine.

This is where Joe Rogan said, are we at step seven?

The rise of militias and parallel forces.

When a state loses he is monopoly on force.

Countdown accelerates. So where are we on this one?

I think we're seeing, maybe early signs of this.

You're starting to see the -- the states kind of organize these mobs, you know, to go after ICE.

Right?

Armed groups, right-wing, left-wing radical secessionists. Anyone.

Once they start forming their own police forces. Or their own option forces, then you have -- then you have everything really falling apart.

Entirely!

I don't think we're there, yet!

But we're starting to see the beginnings of this.

Step eight. The trigger event.

Civil Wars don't begin with a plan. They begin with a spark.

So where are we?

We're not here yet. The conditions are right. Potential triggers, disputed election in '26 or '28.

Political assassination or major attack.

Supreme Court decision that ignites mass unrest.

Financial crisis or dollar crisis.

A state federal standoff turning violent!

Nothing is ignited yet, but the room is soaked in gasoline. So we don't have seven. We're on the verge of eight, at any time. And here's nine.

This is the point of no return.

When police, military, or federal agencies split, even if no one calls it that, well, where are we?

Well, I just read a story about how with the Mamdani election in New York, a good number of the police force is going to leave. And they're going to go join police forces elsewhere. You also have the tension between the state National Guard, and the federal directives, the state guard and the state directives. Law enforcement recruitment is at crisis lows. The distrust of the FBI, DOJ, CIA. Tens of millions of Americans. I always really respected those institutions. I have no respect for them now. If you have states openly defying federal rules on immigration, drug laws, sanctuary policies.
Whistle-blower claims of internal politicization.

All of these things are in play for the first time in 150 years, people can imagine!

So I give this to you, not to be fearful of, but to know where you are. As a map!

Know where you are.

And hopefully, it might wake some people up, if you chart America on, on the nine step model of Civil War. Steps one through four, completed!

Step five, happening!

Step six, happening! Step seven, beginning! Step eight, just waiting for it. And step nine, avoidable, only if step eight, never happens. Again, I'm not telling you for doom purposes, this is diagnosis. This is a doctor going, I want you to look at the chart.

And this is a doctor saying, I want you to look at -- do you see what's happening to your body?

If you don't stop this habit, you are going to die. You don't have to die. You can stop smoking and drinking right now. You can start exercising. But if you don't, you are going to die.

The question is, are we the nation that says, nah, that's not going to happen to me. Or are we the nation that wakes up and sees our chart and says, good heavens, it's way far more gone than I thought it was. But I feel something in the air.

I'm going to change my behavior. The nation that refuses to look and wake up and stop calling their neighbors enemies, is the nation that fails!

We have to strengthen these things that have already fallen. And, you know what, the easiest one to do is?

Church. Where are you ministers and pastors priests and rabbis?

Where the hell are you?

I think there's going to be a special section for you, when you cross over to the -- because you're doing things in the name of God!

So when you get to the other side, I think there's going to be a special section for those who remained silent. While his rights were being taken away.

You don't own that right.

I don't own that right.

The Lord gave us those rights, and said, protect them!

By you, being the representative, the voice box, if you will, of the Lord, to shepherd his people. By you not standing up and saying, hey, by the way, we have -- we have a moral responsibility to protect these rights for the next generation! By you refusing because you're afraid. Because I think, there's no politics in the Bible! There's no politics in the Bible. Really?

The whole thing is about politics. Is about the moral way you have to live your life.

Calling things as you see them. Calling them back to eternal principles.

He didn't tell anybody how to vote. Render to Caesar what is Caesar's.

But there are certain principles that you have to have, or you lose not only this citizenship, but the next citizenship. The one that really matters. And, boy, if you are doing it because you're a coward, you are in the wrong business!

Get out of the pulpit, and go to work at Jack in the Box.

Democrat “SMOKING GUN” on Trump & Epstein gets DESTROYED by facts

The House Oversight Democrats recently released "new" emails allegedly proving President Trump lied about his knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. However, Glenn points out a glaring issue with these emails that destroys their entire narrative...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, let's dive right into the Epstein Maxwell emails. My gosh, Stu!

Why are they trying to cover up that Donald Trump had sex with children!

STU: I mean, it's just clear, as -- as day, in the emails!

GLENN: Yeah. No.

STU: He spent hours with one of the victims. What else could have possibly have occurred in that arrangement? We don't know!

GLENN: And it's -- it's one of the victims, Stu. One of the victims!

STU: One of the victims, that's all we know. One of the victims.

GLENN: Let me read what Jeffrey Epstein wrote. I want you to realize that the dog who hasn't barked is Trump. Victim redacted. Victim spent hours at my house with him. He has never once been mentioned. Police chief, et cetera.

Okay. New information, just released. Or is it?

Because in 2011, 2011, that was released and everybody knew it. It's been out floating around. Here's the change: In 2011, this is what it read.

I want you to realize that the dog hasn't barked is Trump. Virginia spent hours at my house with him.

Why would you redact a name that is already out in the public square!

It's already out!

The memo is already out. The email is already out. It's been out for years. Why would you redact that name now?

Well, because it makes it all of a sudden, new and shiny. Shiny and new. If you don't know who said it, you see victim, and you're like, oh, you see victim. Who is the victim?

I don't know. But when you know it's Virginia, you know this has already gone to court. This is -- she already testified about this!

He didn't partake in any of this, any sex with any of it. It's true. He didn't partake in any sex with us, and I'm quoting, this is from the testimony. But it's not true, that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me. Have you ever met him?

Yes, at Mar-a-Lago, my dad and him. I wouldn't say they were friends, but my dad knew him, and they would talk. Have you ever been in Donald Trump or Jeffrey Epstein's presence with one another? No!

What's the basis of your statement that Donald Trump is a good friend of Jeffrey? Jeffrey has told me that Donald Trump is a good friend of his.

He didn't partake in any of -- any of the sex with any of it. He flirted with me.

It's true, that he didn't partake in any sex with us. But it's not true that he flirted with me.

So I don't understand that. But she goes on. Donald Trump never flirted with me!

Okay. So what -- what's new about this?

This is the same girl, this is the same person that -- didn't she work at Mar-a-Lago?

Or she was going to get a job at Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. I believe she did at one point.

GLENN: Yeah. So we know they know each other. We know they know each other.

We know that at Mar-a-Lago, Jeffrey Epstein would come, and he was poaching the employees. The girls there. To go work for him.

And Donald Trump went to him. And said, "Hey, man. Stop it. Stop poaching people from me. That's not cool. Don't do it." And then he said, "Oh, yeah. All right." And then he did it a second time. And he's like, "You know what, you're out. I don't want you here anymore. I asked you not to do it, and you did it." Now, that doesn't mean that he knew what was happening to the girls or what was happening or anything else.

And even if it did mean something was happening with the girls, he was saying, "Hey. Stop it! Don't take any of the girls or the women here.
Don't do it." I don't believe he knew anything about any of this. But God only knows! And really, God only knows!

This is not new news. Donald Trump, he might end up beating Bezos as the richest man on the planet! When all is said and done!

Because, again, the -- they're presenting this as new fact, a giant scandal. Stu, I don't know if you know this. This is -- this breaking news is a giant scandal.

STU: Yeah. I've heard democratic representatives saying that over the past 24 hours. Yeah. We need to investigate this.

This is shocking stuff. It's a massive scandal. Even ABC News, I heard, pushed back against this. And said, well, what scandal? What are you implying occurred here?

We know who the victim was. We know the victim. Like why. Why did you even redact that name?

And they're like we always redact name of victims.

Do you really? When they're already out publicly?

Not to mention, this particular victim is not even alive.

You know, she sadly died. I mean, it's a terrible, terrible story.

GLENN: Terrible story.

STU: Yeah. She passed away.

A suicide. It was at least the report I believe. But she has a posthumous book coming out. But like a terrible, terrible story.

But, you know, to act as if you have to protect her identity when, number one, she's dead.

GLENN: Is ridiculous.

STU: Number two, everybody already knows who she was, including the news sources, who also have a policy, you would think.

And ABC has a policy. They redact, that was in this type of situation. But it's already been out. We already knew who it was.

So they redacted to make it look like he's with other people who have not already told us nothing bad occurred! You know, and it is an absolutely awful tactic. And at least --

GLENN: I think litigation should follow again. I think he should sue them again. Anyone who is presenting this as new information.

ABC did their job. Congratulations for ABC. They did their job.

They pointed out, this is not new information.

Why would you redact. Why are you releasing this now? And you're redacting a name this -- this email is already out!

You're presenting this as a new scandal.

And you redacted that name. This is completely dishonest. The news media shouldn't even run with it. They shouldn't even run with it. They should have said, old news. Old news. And if you did run with it, you should have handle it had like ABC handle it had. Wait a minute. Why did you redact name.

What do you mean that there's a new scandal. She already testified exactly opposite of what you're believing Jeffrey Epstein over the victim right now. I just want to make sure you understand the Democrats right here. You're taking the name of Epstein, over the victim.

Oh, okay. All right.

STU: And Epstein doesn't even say that anything occurred.

GLENN: No.

STU: There's not -- it's just -- it would be something you would have to jump to a conclusion, to accuse Donald Trump of something like this.

And we know what happened, because the victim said nothing!

Said, it was nothing!

GLENN: Right.

STU: In fact, it wasn't even a flirtation. Which, by the way, even that, you might have thought was creepy. It wasn't even a crime.

It wasn't even flirtation. So it's a disgrace in every single way.

GLENN: All right. So let me take you here. Let me take you here.

If you remember when the shutdown first started, what did the Democrats say, the reason why they did the shutdown?

Not them! Why Mike Johnson and everybody else wouldn't negotiate!

Why wouldn't -- why wouldn't the Republicans negotiate?

Because the heat was on, to release the Epstein files.

And they didn't want to have to do that. So they shut the government down!

Okay?

They wouldn't negotiate. You didn't hear any of this? Oh, it's so arrogant.

STU: It doesn't make any sense at all. That's probably what they said.

GLENN: I know. I know. So the government is open, and what does Mike Johnson do yesterday?

He said the House is going to vote on a bill to release all of the files related to the late financier, convicted child sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein next week. He said on Wednesday that a discharge position to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill, hit the benchmark for needed signatures. It's been decided by him to expedite the vote for the bill, which under the current rules could have been delayed until at least early September.

So he says, as soon as that petition hit, the needed 218 signatures, I brought it up. Unanimous consent. Let's go! Release it.

So he's pushing this forward. Good, Mike!
Release all of it. Thank you!

Get it out. Lance this boil.

I mean, if anybody thinks that you're ever going to get the truth on this in the first place, it's madness. It's madness. Everybody -- I mean, so many important people were involved in this, and it was in the hands of the Democrats for the longest time. Okay?

So they had all of this information. You don't think it was all picked through? And if there was anything about Donald Trump, you don't think that would have come up between 2020 and 2024?

There's nothing in there about Donald Trump. These people are so stupid. This time, we've got him, boys. This time, we've got him.

No, you don't. This time, it's like Wile E. Coyote. This time, we've got the Roadrunner!

No. You're never going to catch him on this. It doesn't work. The guy was the most investigated person in the history of the world, and you've got nothing! Now, it's good to come out.

But if you think you're going to catch a bunch of people on the left, you're not going to. Because they had it, you know, in their possession.

You don't think all of the names were taken out? You don't think things were destroyed, if there was anything? I believe there was something. But I don't believe there's any names in it anymore. You're not going to get the truth on this one. You're just not going to get the truth, but release everything that we have. Everything!

Oh. Oh, by the way, also in the Epstein emails. How come nobody is talking about this one, Stu?

This one is from Michael Wolff, to Jeffrey Epstein. And then Jeffrey Epstein responds.

So Michael Wolff writes, "What's the thumbnail on Nes Baum (phonetic) Foster?"

And Jeffrey Epstein writes back, "Nes Baum White House Counsel, dot, dot, dot, Hillary doing naughties with Vince."

Now, Vince Foster killed himself, you know, and then killed himself at the White House. And then drug himself across the street to the park.

I mean, I don't know -- the Vince Foster thing is so old. And it doesn't -- but why is nobody talking about that one?

Why is no one talking about that?

Also, this the Jeffrey Epstein email bundle, ABC, you don't feel that's necessary to bring that one up?

Huh. Interesting.