RADIOMarch 07, 2023

THESE videos PROVE the January 6th committee LIED TO US

Fox News’ Tucker Carlson began unveiling previously unseen January 6th footage last night, which was provided to him by House Speaker Kevin McCarthy. And the videos PROVE that the congressional January 6th committee, which released its final report last December, LIED TO US ALL. In this clip, Glenn shows some of Tucker’s footage, explaining the lies it proves. So, will those Americans imprisoned based on the committee’s findings receive a new trial? Or is our fair legal system completely over? ‘If every American — Democrat, Republican, Independent — isn't outraged by what our government has just done,’ Glenn says, ‘there is no hope for you. America is lost to you.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So where do we begin, what happened on Tucker last night?

I think -- let me start with what we expected to see. Start with the -- start with cut two. This is what the media has been saying, about Senator Josh Hawley. Listen.

VOICE: You guys have seen the video of Josh Hawley running. How is he going to respond? Because you can't let that sit. It's just awful. He looks like a con. Ha, ha, ha. Running through the halls.

In fact, Josh Hawley was like sprinting past the other senators.

VOICE: I thought he ran like a coward.

VOICE: If you are going to be on the side of evil on this. You're going to be exposed. As soon as the crowd came in, he started running like a baby away.

VOICE: Jim, can we play that back, with audio turned up?

VOICE: They just wanted to embarrass a senator of the United States. Embarrass a man.

GLENN: So handsome, so funny.

VOICE: Why? Just because he ran away like a little --
(laughter)
I mean, what did he do? Yeah, he raised his fists, and he egged the crowd on. But is that a reason to show him pissing his pants on national television?

VOICE: No senators run in the capitol, ever.

It is not what you do in the capitol if you're a senator. You walk slowly.

VOICE: Ah. You do not run for your life. And that's what he was doing there. He is afraid.

GLENN: Right. Yeah. Okay.

Now, that was just one little teeny clip of a longer piece of video, that we found last night with Tucker Carlson. Cut one.

VOICE: When the committee wasn't accusing Republican officeholders of planning riots on January 6th, it was accusing them of running away from those riots like cowards.

In the case of Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, the committee and their allies accused him of both.

VOICE: Josh Hawley is --

VOICE: To prove that Josh Hawley was a coward, the committee released video of him, loping out of the building on the afternoon of January 6th with the police escort. The tape became a staple on social media. Democrats laughed with derision.

VOICE: Later that day, Senator Hawley fled after those protesters he helped to rile up, stormed the capital. See for yourself.
(music)
(laughter)

VOICE: But, in fact, the surveillance footage we reviewed showed that famous clip was a sham, edited deceptively by the January 6th committee.

The clip was propaganda, not evidence. The actual videotape shows that Hawley was one of many lawmakers being ushered out of the building by Capitol Hill police officers. And, in fact, Hawley was at the back of the pack. The coward tape was a lie. One of many from the January 6th committee.

GLENN: Unbelievable.

STU: So he did run -- he's just running with a huge group, that being should find out by police.

GLENN: Police. Police are. Let's go. Let's go. Let us go.

He's the -- the last one after dozens of people, that you see.

STU: Incredible.

GLENN: So they knew this. They knew this.

So when we said that the January 6th committee is nothing more than a sham, and Liz Cheney was on it. And running cover, for the Democrats. And for the liars.

I shouldn't say just Democrats. For anyone who is lying to keep their office.

So she is -- she is lying. She knows it.

And they're doing it, just to discredit.

Justice comes to mind. Our flag is supposed to stand for justice, for all.

Okay. Josh Hawley didn't get any justice. But he's the least of your worries. Josh Hawley didn't get any justice. Will he get any justice?

Will the people on the January 6th committee led by Adam Schiff, a guy we already know lied about Russian collusion.

Is that man going to face impeachment?

Probably not. So is there justice for all?

Because this is not a matter of opinion. We now have it on tape.

Okay. That's, as I said, the least of the -- of the problems.

Let me go to -- let me go to Cut 22, please.

This is about -- remember the shaman? The QAnon shaman.

That everybody was like, he's crazy. And he looked crazy. In all of the tapes, that he saw, he looked crazy.

He didn't look violent, but he looked crazy.

STU: I think he was wearing horns on his head. That's the correct way to make him look crazy.

GLENN: Yeah, no shirt.

So nobody is for the shaman. And he became the symbol.

In fact, I think he got more time that happen anyone else, four years in prison.

Watch. Listen.

VOICE: Dangerous conspiracy theorist dressed in outlandish costume, who led the violent insurrection to overthrow American democracy.

For these crimes, Chansley was sentenced to nearly four years in prison, far more time than many violent criminals now receive.

What did Jacob Chansley do to receive this punishment?

To this day, there's dispute over how Chansley got into the capitol building. But according to our review of the surveillance video, it's very clear what happened once he got inside.

Virtually every moment of his time inside the capitol was caught on tape.

The tapes show that capitol police never stopped Jacob Chansley.

They helped him. They acted as his tour guide. Here's video of Chansley in the Senate chamber. Capitol police officers taken to multiple entrances, and even try to open locked doors for him.

We counted at least nine officers who were within touching distance of unarmed Jacob Chansley. Not one of them even tried to slow him down.

Chansley understood that Capitol Police were his allies. Videos shows him giving thanks for them in a prayer on the floor of the Senate. Watch.

VOICE: Police officers to allow us in the building (inaudible).

GLENN: If you watch this videotape, you see the police officer. The Capitol Police, in hallway after hallway after hallway. Either leading him, ushering him, or directly following him. Just one step behind him.

Walking through a whole crowd of police officers. They were clearly assisting him.

Now, how did that guy, get four years in prison. When he was being escorted by the police.

It's hard to think, that you're being a criminal and doing criminal activity, when the police are opening the doors for you, and here, let's get you into that Senate chamber. Oh, well, this door is locked.

It's pretty hard. Now, we've heard him give a prayer. Thank the police.

That is a conspiracy theory. How dare you. He's saying that, because he's a terrorist, and he's trying to mislead.

Was he?

STU: It's interesting, if you haven't seen this clip too. You might think, well, look, the place was being invaded. They knew a couple of Capitol Police wouldn't stop this giant crowd. So therefore, they're just trying to make peace. You can make that argument in certain videos I've seen. This one though, he's by himself. He's walking by himself, through the crowd.

They could have easily stopped him. Easily stopped him.

GLENN: They were just following him. They assisted him.

STU: Yeah. Here's where you go. Several videos, in front of him.

And they're all alone. I mean, it's not -- again, I can understand, if you've got 300 people in front of you. 400 police officers. Trying to tackle each one of them, is not probably the right maneuver. In this situation, though, they could easily have handcuffed this guy and put him aside.

GLENN: This is footage, that he wasn't allowed to use.

STU: You have to open this trial up again. How can they not have access to this?

GLENN: Open this trial up again. Do you really think, open this trial up again?

STU: You don't think they should do that?

GLENN: Really? Oh, if this were anything else, and somebody was serving four years, and you knew the district attorney, knew this and held this back. You would dismiss it, and release that guy. And apologize. And go after the district attorney.

STU: I would describe that as opening the trial again.

I guess maybe -- what I'm saying, take the result that you have. And either reverse it -- he may still be guilty of trespassing or anything else.

GLENN: You can't try him twice. You can't try him twice.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And the guy needs a new trial.

If you're going to throw him in jail. You need a new trial.

Well, they've already tried him once.

And when they tried him, they lied. Why would he have to stand trial again.

STU: Again, I've watched a lot of law and order episodes.

But it doesn't seem fair, that if this video exists, he should not have access to it, in his defense.

It seems incomprehensible, and against our legal system.

GLENN: They did everything they could, to keep all the information away from their attorneys, to paint these guys.

I mean, I have to tell you, if every American, Democrat, Republican, independent.

If every American isn't outraged by what our government has just done, there is no hope for you. There is no hope. America is lost to you.

This should be as shocking. I was outraged on January 6th. And I still am outraged.

STU: Sure.

GLENN: At the people that were breaking down the doors. Breaking in the windows. Calling for -- hitting police officers.

Those people go to jail. They would go to jail. But everyone must receive a fair trial.

This -- you -- I'm sorry.

But when you have two things, one, just this video of the police escorting him into the Senate chamber.

You got to ask yourself, why would police do that.

With everything that was going on. Why would they escort this guy, into the Senate chamber.

Why? Why would you do that?

STU: At the very least, that question should be asked and answered at that trial? Maybe there's a great answer for it. I don't know what it should be. But certainly answered.

GLENN: Should be asked, at the at least affidavit conference, with the two officers.

STU: Uh-huh.

GLENN: So why would you do that.

Why would you do that? Now, here's the second part. I'll give it to you, in one minute. Imagine for a minute, that you're pregnant.

Hey, you're a man. That's all right. It's not difficult.

Father isn't in the picture. Let's just say. It's going to be you and the baby. And you're really scared. And everyone is telling you, it's not really a baby. It's just a clump of cells.

You don't feel like you have any options. You maybe don't have a lot of people you can trust. And the people you trust, just go, it's painless. It's quick. It's easy. It's your body. It's your choice.

You don't have to be scared. Now, what do you do?

Especially if you know inside, which I think most women do when they're in this situation. That's not right.

But I don't know what to do. I can't handle the baby. Now, imagine someone else comes along. Shows you the other way.

You see the baby forming on an ultrasound, and you know that's a baby. I -- I can't. I can't.

The ministry of Preborn does this every day. Then they hope the mother for up to two years afterward. This is a group of people, that care not only about saving the baby's life. But helping the mother and the child.

$28. It's the cost of dinner. You can introduce an at-risk baby, to her mom, via an ultrasound. You not only save the soul of the mom, the life of the mother, who is going to tear herself apart or just be sucked into darkness. And you'll save the baby.

I think that's worth 28 bucks. Dial #250. Say the key word baby.

That's #250. Key word baby.

Preborn.com/Beck. Preborn.com/Beck.

Sponsored by Preborn. Ten-second station ID.
(music)

GLENN: Now, we told you about Ray Epps. And we have been questioning, who the hell is Ray Epps?

We have done a whole episode on TV. About Ray Epps.

Unless he's a government informer. So what's the truth on Ray Epps?

Well, he testified. He testified he wasn't at the Capitol. Once that thing started, he wasn't at the Capitol. Here's Tucker Carlson, last night, with the video.

That doesn't lie.

VOICE: One of the enduring mysteries of January 6th, is the role intelligence and law enforcement agencies played in the events of that day. We know there was some number of undercover federal agents in the crowd at the Capitol. Officials have since admitted that under oath.

But what exactly were they doing there? The January 6th Committee worked hard to hide the answer to that question.

We do know from contemporaneous videotape that a mysterious figure called Ray Epps, encouraged the crowd to go into the Capitol. For some reason, Epps has never been indicted for that. There's no question he did it.

VOICE: We need to go into the Capitol!

VOICE: Under public pressure, the January 6th committee interviewed Ray Epps. Epps told the committee, he never entered the Capitol. And therefore, never committed a crime. His text messages showed, at 2:12 p.m. he boasted to his nephew, that he had, quote, orchestrated the protest at the Capitol. He had admitted he helped get people there.

Yet, curiously, congressional Democrats considered Ray Epps an ally, not an insurrectionist.

Tonight, we can tell you, that at the very least, Ray Epps lied in his sworn testimony to the January 6th committee. Epps testified that when he sent the text messages to his nephew, he had already left the Capitol grounds to return to his hotel room. That is not true.

The surveillance footage we found, shows that, in fact, Ray Epps remained in the Capitol for at least another half an hour. You're seeing that on your screen now.

What was Epps doing there?

We can't say. But we do know that he lied to investigators. The January 6th committee likely knew this too.

Democrats had access to the same tape. Yet, they defended Ray Epps. No honest investigation would do that.

GLENN: Cut 24.

VOICE: The January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally through the Capitol, after he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters.

And they know that, because they saw this tape.

We can be sure, because the footage contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the Capitol's computer system.

That means, that investigators working for the Democratic Party, reviewed this tape.

They saw it.

But they refused to release the tape to the public. Why? Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country.

Because hiding the truth served their political interests.

GLENN: Stop. So this is Brian Sicknick. A Trump voter. A police officer, who they say, Trump supporters killed by bashing him in the head.

Okay?

We know that's not true. Because of the medical examiner's report. He died the next day, or the day after. From something unrelated. Stroke-related. But they say not related to being struck on the head.

He also in this picture is wearing a helmet. So he's struck in the head with a helmet. That makes it even more different. You know, still bad.

Don't hit a police officer anywhere, with anything.

However, they say, that killed him. They held -- they held a -- I think a mock laying in state. Now that you know the truth.

They knew that he wasn't injured. This videotape shows him, quite energetic.

Picking things up. And putting them away. Escorting people, telling them where to go, et cetera. Et cetera.

After he was hit.

So you have a government now, that has lied to you, at the highest levels. And everywhere in between.

So now what, America? Now what?

You have district attorneys, you have judges. You have the president. You have Congress. You have the Senate.

You have the Capitol Police. Local police.

What do you -- what do you trust?

What's left to trust?

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.