RADIOMay 02, 2022

We’ve DESTROYED men in America. Here’s how it happened.

Boys are taught by their fathers — or by other adults and role models — how to treat girls and women. But, are girls ever taught how to treat a man? NO. And in that vacuum, Glenn says, we’ve destroyed strong men in America. Instead, we’ve been left with weak ‘boys’ who are reactionary, petty, and distracted. So, how can we encourage STRONG men in America again? In this clip, Glenn breaks it down…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I was talking to my son last night. And we were talking about women, and how to treat women. And my son-in-law said, you know, I've heard you say it over and over again. And I've said it over and over again, to my son. Hey, you don't treat women that way. Hey, you don't hit women. Hey, get the door for your mom. Show respect for women.

And in -- you know, traditional families at least, we are taught, boys are taught by their fathers and others, how to treat a woman.

He asked me, have you ever heard anybody teach their girls how to treat a man? And I thought, no!

I've never heard anyone say, hey. You don't treat a man like that. Have you?

And in that vacuum, we have destroyed man. Men are not men anymore. They're really nothing.

Because a man can be a woman. We are taking apart the genders. And once you take apart. This is the basic building block of all of the universe.

All of the animal kingdom, everything. Male and female.

An egg and the fertilizer. It boils down to science. Not the science. But science. Basic science.

You destroy that, and everything else becomes a lie. Everything else -- because it doesn't get any more basic than egg, fertilize, life. Family.

It doesn't. That's it. That's how it all began, gang. Even if you believe in evolution, those monkeys were doing something in the cave. So we are describing men. Just destroying them.

And I want to talk to you about that. Give me 60 seconds. We'll come right back.

So if you look at, you know, history or you look at even the Bible as a history book, you'll always see men gathering at the gates.

Men gathering at the gates. Why?

Well, the men watched for intruders. They made announcements. They carried out justice there. In the Bible, they convened with angels at the gates. The men at the gates. They were not only responsible for the physical protection of the city, but also the social and the legal and spiritual protection as well.

The men at the gates. And some men, met at the gate. They were protectors. And supporters.

Others were not.

Others also met at the gates. And they were the destroyers. So we still have men at the virtual gates. But most of the men are destroyers, or they're drunk and asleep. And I don't mean -- I don't mean chemically drunk. I mean, spiritually, or temporally, just drunk. They're not on guard.

Men are supposed to be protectors and leaders. And supporters of their family. And their community. Their -- they protect.

How many men are doing that right now? Protecting our communities? Protecting our families?

Oh, cops do that. Leadership in 2022. This ain't ancient times. But it's not even the 1970s anymore. And we're not going back.

And part of that is good. You know, 1950s, all women were housewives. And all men work at the office, and have a briefcase. Man, I'm glad those days are gone. I'm glad. I mean, I think everyone, Stu, that has been in charge of my television division has always been a woman. Hasn't it? The last 20 years?

STU: Often, yeah. Yeah.

GLENN: Yeah. Great! Great!

But where are the men? And I don't mean in positions -- I just mean, where are men?

Where are men that are willing to stand at the gates? See, what's going to happen is, men are going to get really pissed off soon, at all of this stuff. Because they're just being erased. And so there are men now, that are coming back and saying, you know, women should stay at home. I don't know these people.

But I am afraid, that that will -- we've got to go back to tradition. Okay. All right.

Male and female, mom and dad. Okay.

But we need men who defined themselves. Men who serve, men who care. Most importantly, men who are driven, by a moral code.

Do we have a moral code anymore?

You know, look at what we've done. We first destroyed all of our heroes. This is so brilliant. In the way this has been pulled off.

What did they do? They chipped away, for 100 years. At anyone who could be a hero. By the time I was growing up, they had already destroyed the founders and everybody else. And now they were going after other heroes. There was no such thing as an American, anymore.

Someone your kids could look up to. And then the last part, heroes gave up on it. The people who used to, at least, you know, try to do the right thing. Because, hey, the kids are watching me. And the kids look up to me. That was over.

Now it's like, yeah. I'm doing blow. What's the deal?

Yeah. I was doing it at home plate. What's the problem? I'm no role model.

You're a man. You should be a role model.

People just gave up, entirely. On being a man. Well, we're at a place now, where the men and the boys, have to be separated. We have to separate the men from the boys. And I think we're starting to see some real modern day leaders, Ron DeSantis is one of them. Elon Musk is another one.

I want to -- I want to continue our conversation, and the difference between men and boys.

GLENN: Welcome to Friday. The Glenn Beck Program. We're talking about the difference between men and boys. And we need good, strong men to stand up. Not a strong man. Strong men.

You know, our Founders -- did you know that women could vote in the founding era? Did you know that?

This was something that the men of the age understood. The men. The thinking men. I'm sure there were plenty of, my wife -- she's in the kitchen now. She caught on fire last night, on the stove. But she ain't smart enough to vote.

I'm sure those people existed, okay?

But the Founders. The men -- they didn't have a problem with women voting. They didn't have a problem with men holding office.

You know, there was a judge in, where was it? New Hampshire. It was the first black man to be elected. And it was like 1723. And he served 80 years as a black -- or 60 years, as like a black judge, in a white community.

Okay?

A lot of this stuff is -- is new. And definitely not American. Not American.

Women could vote. But it was one vote for the property. So whoever the property owner was. So, you know, husband. Wife. Widow.

Widower. It didn't matter. One vote.

That all changed. Because I think boys got involved. Greed got involved.

Power became involved. And that's the difference between the men and boys. Boys are reactionary. They're petty. They're distracted. Men are ground. Men are supportive. Men are alert.

There's actually this movement, among the boys, to abolish the 19th amendment. Are you out of your mind?

Well, men don't have a place -- women. Shut up.

Go protect a gate, will you?

Men protect rights. Men protect families.

Men protect common sense and decency. You know, my -- we were talking last night. My grandmother was asked to dance by my grandfather. This was like 1915.

Asked to dance. They had not met before. But he spotted her across the room. And he went unto her and said, hello, my name is Edward Janssen. And would you like to dance?

And she said, no. My grandfather never danced with her after they were married or anything, because he thought, they didn't talk a lot. He thought that she didn't like to dance because she said no. And it was like at their 50th wedding anniversary, that he said, well, she didn't like to dance. And she said, where did you get that? He said, you turned me down to dance. She said, because I didn't know you. We weren't properly introduced.

Now, think of this. Right now. Go ahead. Try to date. People think it's creepy if you go to a bar and you go work up a courage to go up to a girl. This generation is starting to think that's creepy. That's not creepy. That's unbelievably nerve-racking.

Now you just swipe. And people are now getting to this place where, yeah. We're going to have sex. And if the sex is good, maybe we'll date. What are you, out of your mind?

How do you even date?

I know girls -- I know women here, that are not dating, because of that. They're like, I'm just hoping that some guy is going to go, hey. I kind of like the old-timey way, and let's get to know each other.

That's remarkable. That's remarkable. There's something to be said for a code of honor. There's something to be said. I mean, is there a better thing?

I don't want to date you. The dancing thing is probably a little over the top. But we haven't been properly introduced. Meaning, somebody that I know, should vouch for you.

And say, hey. Clara, I want you to meet my friend Ed. You two -- you two should dance.

Okay?

There's something to be said for -- for that.

We don't have -- there's no trust, at all.

Things are becoming very toxic. Thoughtless.

Sexist. Women are being destroyed. They are. Your girls are not going to be able to compete in sports.

Dave Rubin said to me yesterday, he said, you just wait. Because some guy, who is like the Colin canner in this case of the NBA is going to say, yeah. I'm a woman. And going to the WNBA, and he will crush the women. Then what? I mean, nobody watches it, anyway, so it doesn't matter.

STU: They might start watching it, if that happens.

GLENN: Yeah. I know. I know.

STU: That would be a fun league.

GLENN: We need real men in America again. Men who empower their communities. And everyone in them. Men who say, enough is enough.

Men who thoughtfully choose for themselves, when and what to react to. Men who create peace and not chaos. We don't need any more boys. We don't. We've got plenty of them.

We don't need more boys in our -- you know, between our four walls. We need more men at the gates. Maybe this is just me, because I spent time with my boys yesterday. And they're grown up. And I don't know what -- I can't relate to their world, at all. I don't think any of us can. The world has changed dramatically.

But boys are not being taught how to be men. They're being taught that being a man is toxic. John Wayne said, a good man has to have a code. You know, that's why Yellowstone is so popular. Because as sick and twisted as it is, they had a code.

The sopranos. Why do we like The Godfather?

Because there was a code. Now, it's screwed up. And it's bad.

But there is no moral code anymore. Patrick Henry said, great men overcome the evils of life. Abraham Lincoln has said to say, a man stands his tallest when he stoops down to help a child. Ben Franklin, there's never been a truly great man, who is not also truly virtuous.

We hate dictators, because they're not men, they're monsters. Manhood is not about oppression. It is virtue. Duty, service. That's what our whole life is supposed to be. At the heart of manhood and at the heart of woman hood is love. Love is patient and kind and selfless. It's not irritable. It's not selfish. It doesn't insist on doing things my way.

It rejects darkness. It rejoices in faith, and hope.

That's manhood. At its finest.

Frank Sinatra, you know, some people get their kicks stomping on a the dream. That's all it seems we're surrounded by. People who want to stomp on dreams.

And it's not because -- it's not because they're necessarily negative about it. It's just that they don't -- they don't have success. You're not going to have success. Or if you have success, then I'll lose some of my power, so I'm going to stomp on you.

Look at what is coming for Elon Musk. The good news is, we -- we've heard the phrase before. And I think there is nothing more true and appropriate, to explain today's world than this phrase: Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And weak men create hard times.

We are in the -- in the era of hard times. Because weak, pathetic men have allowed themselves to be stomped into oblivion with lies.

Women need men like fish need a bicycle. Really? Really?

Men can get pregnant.

These are all lies. Men need women. Any good husband knows -- no. Let me rephrase that. Any good husband is like, I give my wife anything. I'll do anything for my wife.

You know, in the worst of times, you're like, just tell me. Just -- just tell me what it is to stop the madness. Just tell me. I don't understand.

But that actually does come from a place of love, and -- and at that point surrender of, I -- I don't speak your language. I don't even know what you're talking about.

And good women are the same. They may not understand, but they just want their husband to be happy. Hard times are here, because we have had weak men. But hard times create strong men.

That means, a new era of good men are just over the horizon.

It's our job to raise them. It's our job to encourage them.

It's our job to be them ourselves.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.