RADIO

Would world leaders ACTUALLY consider NUCLEAR WAR?

A now-deleted message from the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Russian Federation originally warned citizens last weekend to prepare for a possible ‘retaliatory nuclear strike from NATO countries.’ According to Newsweek, Russian officials say the message was written and posted by hackers. But despite the warning’s uncertain origin, the fact we’re discussing even the SLIGHTEST possibility of a nuclear war means our world leaders have gone too far, Glenn says: ‘[The world] is being run by a seemingly group of crazy people. And the rest of us are sitting here going, what the hell? Where are we going? What's happening?!’ So, would leaders ACTUALLY consider escalating today’s conflict into a nuclear war?!

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: You know, I watched something last night, I saw this alert, last night.

And I thought, hmm. And I -- I listened to something, I haven't listened to since I was a kid. Listen to this. This was produced for schools.

VOICE: We all know the atomic bomb is very dangerous. Since it may be used against us. We must get ready for it. Just as we're ready for many dangers that are around us all the time. Fire is a danger. It can burn whole buildings if someone is careless, but we are ready for fires.

We have a fine fire department to put out the fire, and to have fire drills in your school, so you'll know what to do. Automobiles can be dangerous too.

They sometimes cause bad accidents. But we're ready. We have safety rules, that car drivers and people who are walking must obey. Now, we must be ready for a new danger. The atomic bomb.

First, you will have to know what happens when an atomic bomb explodes. You'll know when it comes. We hope it never comes, but we must get ready.

It looks something like this.

There's a bright flag, brighter than the sun, brighter than anything you've ever seen.

If you're not ready, you do not know what to do. It could hurt you in different ways. It could knock you down hard. Or throw you against a tree or a wall. It's such a big explosion. It can smash in buildings. And knock sign boards over. And break windows all over town. But if you duck and cover, like Bert, you will be much safer. You know how bad sunburn can feel.

The atomic bomb flash could burn you worse than a terrible sunburn, especially when you're not covered. Now, you and I don't have shells to crawl into, like birds and turtles, so we have to cover up in our own way. First, you duck, and then you cover.

And very tightly, you cover the back of your neck, your face. Duck and cover underneath a table or a desk, or anything else close by. In Betty's school, they're talking about the atomic bomb too. Betty is asking her teacher, how can we tell when the atomic bomb explodes? And the teacher is explaining, there are two kinds of attack, with warning and without any warning.

We think that most of the time, we will be warned before the bomb explodes. So there will be time for us, to get into our homes and schools, or some other safe place.

Our civil defense workers, now, our men in uniform, will do everything they can, to warn us, before enemy planes can bring a bomb near us. You may be in your school yard playing, when the signal comes.

That signal means to stop whatever you're doing, and get to the nearest safe place fast. Always remember, the flash of an atomic bomb can come at any time. No matter where you may be.

GLENN: Holy cow.

That's the kind of stuff that I grew up watching in -- in school. You would have a -- an atomic bomb thing. I -- I don't think it was every year. But I remember going home, terrified. Terrified. Of the bomb.

And you notice what they said? The bomb is so strong, it could knock you down. Yeah. Kids. It will also vaporize you. That's another one of the options, that whole duck and cover thing, didn't ever cover.

It is just bizarre, that we are sitting here, at this time. And I know the heart of the American people. The American people care deeply about the people who are having their lives destroyed, over in Ukraine.

But none of us -- none of us would say, let's get into a nuclear war.

If they launched -- if Russia launched a -- a nuclear missile, or developed a nuclear bomb. Even one of the strategic, you know, low-yield nuclear bombs, anywhere.

Except in our territory, would you be for a retaliatory strike?

STU: Because this is an interesting thing. I think we've always thought of nuclear war like that. Nuclear war is big flashes on your home turf. And massive city destroying nuclear weapons. And then when they fire those, we retaliate mutual -- mutually assured destruction, right?

That's the standard recipe over many decades. Well, the new world is, of course, they have these strategic nuclear weapons, that could be used on battlefields. Can be used for all sorts of different purposes. I mean, certainly, you know, if -- if Russia comes tomorrow, and decides, you know, Mary Opal is going to be the subject of the first usage of one of these weapons. It's going to do a lot of damage there, but that would not be something that the United States would be advocating a nuclear response to.

GLENN: If that happened. And let's say Russia hits a NATO country.

STU: They drop one in Poland?

GLENN: In Poland. Would you be for us firing ICBMs?

STU: Yeah. And I -- we would be bound by treaty, to respond.

GLENN: Right. But not like that.

STU: Yeah. Right. I mean, we would do everything we could to stay out of that, I think. But --

GLENN: At least with nuclear weapons.

STU: With nuclear weapons. We would be in a war with Russia, in the circumstance. I don't think there's any doubt about it. Even if you don't like the treaty. Even if you don't like NATO, it would be hard to imagine the West overlooking a nuclear strike on a NATO country of any sort.

GLENN: This is a real clear case, at least to me, I feel, like the people of the world, are so disconnected to the leadership of the world. The Lynn of the world, they're not listening to the average person.

It's all being run by these seemingly group of crazy people. And the rest of us are sitting here going, what the hell? Where are we going? Wait. What's happening?

And it seems that -- I mean, if God forbid, something like this happens, I hope someone is around to, you know, write down or tell, I don't know. The -- the poor guy, who has just broken his glasses, sitting at the library. You know, just wanting to read books. Because that's all he ever wanted to do. Twilight Zone. I hope someone is alive to say, the average person was not for this. The average person in the world, knew this was madness. Absolute madness. And in the end, what destroyed us, was our leaders. Back in a minute.

RADIO

How the WHO's 'pandemic treaty' could CONTROL governments

On May 22nd, the World Health Assembly — which is the governing body of The World Health Organization — will meet in Switzerland to discuss next steps for its ‘pandemic treaty [and its] quest to use public health to expand The WHO’s power over sovereign states,’ Daniel Horowitz reports for TheBlaze. He explains how certain amendments to be added to this treaty could ‘allow the director-general of the WHO to declare a public health emergency in a country and unilaterally coerce its citizens to take certain actions.’ The far-left and global elite continue to destroy our sovereignty, Glenn says, and this is just one more step toward their desired global government.

Read more: https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-states-mus...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I read some stuff this morning. I've been doing some research on what's happening with the WHO. And I read their stuff today, that will make your head explode. And is really evil and important.

But let me give you this today, from -- from Daniel Horowitz at TheBlaze. States must preemptively nullify any WHO international pandemic regulation.

I'm going to read it verbatim because it's just so well-written. And now is the time, that things are shifting. We're going to. There's going to be a New World Order out there. And we've got to lead it. And we have to unite the rest of the free world in doing it. That's Joe Biden. March 21st, 2022.

Any Republican that is running without mentioning your intent to fight the global pandemic treaty or regulations, might as well run as a Democrat. This is really super important, and it is beginning to happen next week. On May 22nd, the world health assembly, the governing body of the World Health Organization, is going to meet in Geneva Switzerland to discuss the next step in its pandemic treaty. And the quest to use public health to expand the WHO's power over sovereign states. Representatives from 193 nations, including the US, will be attending the only country, not invited is Taiwan.

Gee, I wonder why. So what is this treaty? On January 24th, 2022, the director general of the WHO explained the treaty was a priority, to urgently strength the WHO, as leading and the director authority on global health, at the center of the global health architecture. He laid out the guiding principle of this plot. We, quote, all want a world in which science triumphs over misinformation. Solidarity triumphs over division. And equity is a reality, not an aspiration. He said, we are one world, we have one health. We are one WHO.

Now, this has not been announced. Biden has not even spoken about it. They are deathly quiet about this. But they're going to be approving amendments. The proposed amendments are essentially going to allow the director general of the WHO to declare public health emergencies in any country. And unilaterally coerce its citizens to take certain actions. Here's one of the amendments, a critical section from article nine. The WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the state party, whose territory the event is allegedly occurring. But this is the way it's going to read. Now, WHO may take into account, reports from sources of other than notifications or consultations -- consultations shall assess these reports, according to established principles. And then communicate information on the event, to the state party, in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring.

Now, they have scratched out, before taking any action based on reports, the WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the state party. That's all gone. They're taking that out.

So WHO gets information, has reports, and they can act without verifying with the president or anybody else.

Why would you be erasing the requirement, for the WHO to consult with the government?

Number four. If the state party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO, it used to say, May. It now says, WHO shall -- when justified by the magnitude of public health risk, immediately share with other state parties, the information available, whilst encouraging the state party to accept the offer of collaboration, by the WHO. It used to say there, while taking into accounts the views of the state party concerned.

So they're erasing all of our sovereignty. This is going to be another thing. They're going to say, is a conspiracy theory. It is not. You can look it all up. It is the world health agenda. From the World Health Organization. They are meeting in Geneva, on May 22nd. So that's next week. They are intentionally quiet on this.

Because they know the power. Now, we also know what the WHO is. You remember, when everybody was saying, we have to get out of the WHO.

They're just a tool of China. Why would you say that?

Forget that I mentioned that Taiwan is the only country that is not invited to this in Geneva.

PAT: Yeah. That's completely -- completely irrelevant.

GLENN: Completely. Amen, brother.

PAT: I don't even know why you brought it up in the first place.

GLENN: Thank you. Thank you.

PAT: It's a good thing they weren't actually -- I wish we weren't invited to it.

GLENN: Well, I will tell you this. Another reason why Donald Trump. They fought so hard to keep him out: Because he wouldn't have --

PAT: He sure wouldn't have. That's exactly right.

GLENN: He wouldn't have empowered the WHO.

PAT: Well, he took us out of the WHO.

GLENN: That's exactly right. And this president is not only putting us back, they're taking away our sovereignty.

And so it's one more piece to the global governance of the left. Warning.

Shorts

Kamala repeats herself 5 TIMES in 30 seconds…

Kamala Harris, America's no. 2 in command, just spoke at a climate change conference. So how'd you think she did? Was she eloquent and able to lay out a vision for a better world? Probably not, but check this video out and let's all find out.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Right vs. Left: The Time for Compromise Is OVER | Jesse Kelly | Ep 146

The Left worked for decades to get control, and now they have it: “Every cultural pillar has been infected and taken over,” Jesse Kelly warns Glenn. So, it’s time to get out of the stands and onto the field. On this episode of "The Glenn Beck Podcast," the host of the nationally syndicated "Jesse Kelly Show" joins with a blunt message for the Right: The time for compromise is gone. This system that’s raising young people who hate America can’t be salvaged, and while taking back Congress in 2022 would be nice, LOCAL victories are what really matter. But this won’t be a quick fight. Thankfully, Jesse has some solutions, and they involve Play-Doh …

Shorts

Where are our STANDARDS, America?

Since when are we the people that throw our hands up and accept the new normal?

We're the people, that despite all odds, we took it on. We didn't settle for less. And that's what they're telling you to do now, settle for less.

No. That's not who we are. Why would we be willing to sit around and wait for the government to fix it?

Don't lower your standards. That's un-American. We don't lower our standards. We raise standards. And that is our legacy.