BLOG

Nancy Pelosi’s Response to a Law-Abiding Gun Owner Is a Doozy

Not even a week after the Las Vegas tragedy, Nancy Pelosi was approached by a concerned citizen about the right to self-defense and Pelosi’s answer is just what you imagined it would be. It fell flat and made no sense whatsoever.

“How does rendering me defenseless protect anybody else from a violent crime?” the young woman asked.

The Minority Leader responded with a quip claiming, “No one is advocating that. We’re not talking about taking guns away from people. What we’re talking about is to make sure that people who have guns register and that there are background checks to prevent other people from being in harm’s way.”

Well, we have that. Today as Pat filled in for Glenn, he broke down some of the gun laws already in place and agonized over the fact that Democrats continue to call for stricter gun laws despite the fact that it’ll do nothing but make it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to obtain a gun.

This article provided courtesy of TheBlaze.

Also, Nancy Pelosi was confronted by a concerned citizen yesterday on CNN about guns and gun ownership. And --

JEFFY: "Powerful" is the word you're looking for?

PAT: Powerful. Yes. Yes. Should get just a powerful response.

JEFFY: Powerful. Okay. Good. That's what I thought.

PAT: See what you think of this.

VOICE: How does rendering me defenseless -- me meaning, a law-abiding citizen -- by taking away my ability to defend myself in the manner in which I believe I should be able to choose to, where I want to? How does rendering me defenseless protect anybody else from a violent crime?

NANCY: Well, let me be a consolation to you, nobody is advocating that. We're not talking about taking guns away from people.

PAT: Yes, you are. That's a lie.

NANCY: We're talking about -- to make sure that people who have guns register, and that there are background checks on that.

PAT: There are background checks. I went through one when I bought my AR-15 and when I bought a handgun.

I went through background -- we have background checks. They act like there's never been a background check on anybody. Almost everyone has gone through a background check to buy a gun. And they always say this: Well, all we want are background checks. Well, we have that.

JEFFY: We have that.

NANCY: Prevent other people from being in harm's way. But no one is questioning your right to have a gun or to eliminate your safety.

PAT: Okay. That's just not true. That's just a lie.

JEFFY: That's not what she said.

PAT: A lot of people are advocating that we take guns away from people.

JEFFY: Yes, they are.

PAT: And a lot of people are advocating that we ban guns. And the right shall not be infringed. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Second Amendment wording, not mine. So you keep -- you keep bringing this up, and you keep avoiding discussing the right not being infringed, by saying it's common sense.

Well, no, it isn't. No, it isn't common sense. Okay? It's unconstitutional what you're talking about doing.

JEFFY: While they're infringing.

PAT: While they're infringing. They're talking about -- well, I'm not talking about the Second Amendment. I'm just talking about common sense. Nobody is talking -- nobody is talking about the Second Amendment.

JEFFY: Don't be stupid.

PAT: They know they have to say that. Because if you were to poll the American people, you know, it would be easily, 80 -- 85 percent of Americans would want the Constitution upheld.

JEFFY: Yes.

PAT: I hope it's that high still.

(laughter)

JEFFY: Don't take that poll. Don't take that poll. Don't take that poll.

PAT: Yeah. Maybe we don't want anybody to take that poll. But America still believes in the United States Constitution. And that's why they always say, "Oh, I'm not talking about the Second Amendment. I'd never touch the Second Amendment.

JEFFY: That's the Constitution.

PAT: No, I'm just talking about common sense gun law. Okay. Well, yeah, your common sense gun law, it's unconstitutional. So stop talking about it.

(laughter)

JEFFY: But she's not talking about it.

PAT: She's not talking about that though. She is talking about background checks, which we already have.

JEFFY: Yeah, but she's talking about background checks.

PAT: That's right. Background checks. And what was her other point? I've completely forgotten what the other --

NANCY: At all. That kind of clarification. Because that is part of the argument, well, you're going to take away -- nobody is taking away anybody's guns. All we're saying is, you should have a background check.

PAT: We have that.

NANCY: And people -- responsible gun owners from the hills of Arizona to duck blinds of Minnesota, all over, say, we're all law-abiding. We have many guns. We have as many guns as he has. But we have --

PAT: Yes. Hello.

NANCY: -- background checks.

PAT: But we have...

Background checks. Seriously, something is wrong with her.

JEFFY: Something is definitely wrong.

PAT: Say it again. Something is definitely wrong with Nancy Pelosi.

JEFFY: I'm not sure what it is, but there is an issue.

PAT: Yeah, there's -- I think there is an issue.

JEFFY: And she's quoting the great line from the song from the hills of Arizona to the

duck blinds --

PAT: To the shores of Tennessee.

JEFFY: To the duck blinds of Minnesota. I mean, I was just humming that yesterday.

(laughter)

PAT: It's -- that's -- what's the name of that song? It's --

JEFFY: Oh, beautiful, right?

PAT: No. It's a patriotic song by the country singer.

You don't know.

JEFFY: Yeah, yeah. No. Yes. Yes. I do.

PAT: What's-his-face? Who performed it --

JEFFY: Yes.

PAT: He performed it at a rally for America. Lee Greenwood. Lee Greenwood.

JEFFY: I'm trying to put Lee Greenwood out of my mind.

PAT: Well, ever since that rally for America where Lee Greenwood wouldn't stop playing -- in fact, I think it was 2003 that the concert took place. He just wrapped it up 15 minutes ago.

He would not stop. It was like hours.

JEFFY: I saw Lee Greenwood in a powerful performance in Tampa, Florida.

PAT: Did you?

JEFFY: The music sound system was down. Okay? And so all he had was just a one-stand microphone that was working. And he performed.

PAT: You can't stop him from performing. You can't -- you cannot stop Lee Greenwood. He's like the Energizer bunny. He just keeps going.

Tom in Nevada. Hi, you're on the Glenn Beck Program.

GLENN

INSANITY: High schooler ARRESTED after not wearing mask at school tells her story

On Thursday's radio program, Grace Smith and her father, Andy, joined Glenn Beck on the phone and provided a first-hand account of Grace's refusal to wear a mask at school.

Smith, 16, began a maskless protest after her school district in Laramie, Wyoming, decided to implement a mask mandate. As a result, Grace received three suspensions, was issued two $500-citations, and was eventually arrested.

"How long were you in jail?" Glenn asked.

Grace said was taken to jail but was never booked nor was she was placed in a jail cell.

Glenn commended Grace's father, Andy, for raising such a "great citizen" and asked if it was Grace's idea to protest. Andy said it was Grace's idea, explaining that they took the position of arguing on the grounds of civil rights rather than the efficacy of wearing a mask.

Grace has since withdrawn from public school and started a home school program. She also told Glenn that she will continue to fight the school district, legally.

You can donate to Grace's legal fund here.

To hear more from this conversation click here.

Disclaimer: The content of this clip does not provide medical advice. Please seek the advice of local health officials for any COVID-19 and/or COVID vaccine related questions & concerns.

Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

RADIO

Jason Whitlock: Raiders coach fired by NFL as a ‘SIGNAL’ to others

Raiders Head Coach Jon Gruden was forced to resign (fired) by the NFL on Monday due to 'misogynistic' and 'homophobic' language found in several of his old, private emails. But Jason Whitlock, sports writer and host of 'Fearless' on BlazeTV, tells Glenn that Gruden's words never should have resulted in his job lost: 'We should have accepted his apology and kept it moving.' But instead, Whitlock says the NFL chose to use Gruden as a 'signal' for all other employees who may oppose the football organization's current, far-left political stances: 'Taking over sports, taking over the NFL, is crucial to the goals of the left and what they're trying to do.'

RADIO

How an ‘orchestrated’ revolution is bringing America TO ITS KNEES

Victor Davis Hanson, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, joins Glenn to discuss his new book, 'The Dying Citizen.' He explains how America's hippies from the 1960s are the progressive elites running our institutions today and how their 'well orchestrated' moves have created a top-down revolution that's 'bringing us down to our knees.' So, what's the solution? Davis Hanson tells Glenn what we can do to push back against the far left today…

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Who Is More Evil: Government or Facebook? | Robby Soave | Ep 120

The Left and Right agree: Social media companies like Facebook are abusing their power — whether through censorship or harmful, groupthink-creating algorithms. But is the solution really more censorship and regulation, like government fearmongers and leftist "whistleblowers" have insisted? Glenn sits down with the senior editor at Reason, Robby Soave, who has a much more refreshing solution laid out in his latest book, "Tech Panic: Why We Shouldn't Fear Facebook and the Future." Politicians have weaponized the fear we have about social media. So, maybe we should be looking at the positives. Glenn and Robby take a look at the (very familiar) history of tech panic and censorship, balance the consequences of changing Section 230, and expose the real threat to the future of free speech: Progressive tyranny entrenched in the old school media.