BLOG

‘Doomsday Clock’ Says We’re 2 Minutes Away From the Apocalypse … Because of This?

Is the world ending again?

Maybe. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, a panel of scientists and academics that’s been tracking nuclear threats since the 1940s, has ticked the Doomsday Clock forward to just two minutes shy of midnight.

The symbolic clock is closer to midnight – and a nuclear doomsday – than it’s ever been.

Why do scientists think we’re so close to doomsday?

The group says nuclear weapons and climate change are the biggest threats to humankind. They believe the world is close to nuclear war because of the rapid growth of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program last year and because the Trump administration has added gasoline to the fire.

“Hyperbolic rhetoric and provocative actions by both sides have increased the possibility of nuclear war by accident or miscalculation,” the report said.

The scientists also say President Donald Trump pushed the world closer to doomsday by withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord.

Glenn’s take:

“Nuclear weapons aren’t a joke. But your argument kind of loses the punch when you put climate change as the same danger as nuclear weapons,” Glenn said on today’s show.

This article provided courtesy of TheBlaze.

GLENN: I want you to know, we're not going to make it. We're not going to make it.

Yesterday, very disturbing bulletin came out from atomic scientists, which sound like a secret society of weirdos. But they got together and moved the doomsday clock 30 seconds ahead.

Oh, my God. I remember as a kid, the doomsday clock, and the fear it instilled in me. And, of course, we all died, you know, back in the '70s, when they were doing this. I mean, they've been doing the doomsday clock for a while.

It's two minutes until midnight now. And the doomsday clock, it hasn't been two minutes to midnight since 1953. And you remember, right? I mean, you remember -- what was doomsday -- doomsday 1956, when the world exploded, and everybody died. And then again they set the doomsday clock, I think it was like three minutes to -- to midnight. You know, during the Reagan administration.

It was just crazy. You remember we all died. But, you know, this isn't some Casio doomsday clock. This is the official doomsday clock. This is the one that should freak you out.

The Board of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, fifteen Nobel Prize winners. You do not win a Nobel Prize for nothing.

Anyway, they have been setting the doomsday clock for a while. They've been setting this thing for 71 years. And one of the members said at a press conference today, the danger of some sort of nuclear catastrophe is greater than it was during the Cold War. And most people are blissfully unaware of this danger.

Worst than the Cold War. Now, what's the alarm? Well, the failure of President Trump and other world leaders to deal with the looming threats of nuclear war and climate change.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Ten years ago, the group said climate change is nearly as dire as the danger of nuclear weapons. But that was before Donald Trump got in.

Now they are equally as dangerous. Trump and climate change. Those are the ultimate bogeyman of the left.

Another doomsday spokesman said the risk of nuclear weapons being used undoubtedly increased last year, which is why they've decided to move the clock ahead 30 seconds. But they also said that the danger is worse because of humanity's inaction on climate change.

That's crazy. Now, reading between the lines, I guess that means the world is getting hotter. And then it will get super, super hot.

And, you know, people will be in a bad mood because it's hotter. As we know, in -- you know, in Chicago, when it gets hot, if there's a heat wave in Chicago, that is what causes everybody to break down.

So if it gets hot, like it does in Chicago, and it's a heat wave all around the world -- nuclear war. And then it's 7,000 degrees. And then I don't know what to do.

Because I wasn't around in 1956, when it was this close to doomsday. And, of course, we had the doomsday, you know, when everybody died back then. Back then, and in the '70s. I don't remember them clearly.

So I don't know what we would do.

Now, I hate to sound insensitive to the doomsday crowd because nuclear weapons aren't a joke. But your argument kind of loses a punch when you put climate change as the same danger as nuclear weapons. And I know -- I know climate change.

Here's one: Let's try AI.

You know how they described -- AI was part of moving it. But they said, that's the vague threat of AI. AI researchers will tell you that AI has a much better chance of happening in the next 20 years than anything with climate change. And the good news: If you want to look for good news with AI, AI might give us all the answers on how we can protect the planet.

But I just want to give credit to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. I mean, they won a Nobel Prize.

And, again, they just don't give those out. Not the nuclear war isn't a serious threat. But we need a separate larger, more urgent clock, that counts us down to AI. Counts us down to all of the troubles. Counts us down to all of us just tearing each other apart.

How about that one? Maybe that's a doomsday clock that we should be watching. And, you know, not just because the guy who is in office you don't like.

RADIO

Jason Whitlock: Here’s why black men & black Americans relate to Donald Trump

Black celebrities like Kanye West & Ice Cube aren't alone. In fact, sportswriter Jason Whitlock says it shouldn't be a surprise that more and more black men are supporting Donald Trump. He says that unlike President Obama, Trump actually "has a record" of helping black Americans. And, because he's an alpha male, Whitlock says the president's fearlessness is something black men relate to. Whitlock explains why Trump nearly convinced him to register to vote, and he describes how his long-time Democratic mother reacted when she experienced a softer side to the president.

BLOG

Megyn Kelly: Media coverage of President Trump is ‘DISGUSTING’

Megyn Kelly is not happy about the "disgusting" media coverage of President Donald Trump, specifically pointing to Lesley Stahl's "60 Minutes" interview on CBS Sunday.

On the radio program, Megyn told Glenn Beck the media has become so blinded by the "Trump Derangement Syndrome" that they've lost their own credibility — and now they can't get it back.

"It's disgusting. It's stomach-turning," Megyn said of the media's coverage of the president. "But it's just a continuation of what we've seen over the past couple of years. Their 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' has blinded them to what they're doing to their own credibility. They can't get it back. It's too late. They've already sacrificed it. And now no one is listening to them other than the hard partisans for whom they craft their news."

Megyn also discussed how she would have covered the recent stories about Hunter and Joe Biden's alleged corruption. Watch the video below to catch more of the conversation:


Want more from Glenn Beck?

To enjoy more of Glenn's masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution and live the American dream.

EVENTS

2020 M1 VIRTUAL GALA: Watch the entire event here in case you missed it live

On this special night, we rejoiced in the lives of those impacted by our humanitarian relief efforts, education programs and preservation of American heritage. Together, we will chart the way forward as we seek to better our country and the world around us. If you missed the event but would still like to donate, click HERE to submit your donation.

Thanks again for making this years M1 Gala one of our most successful to date!

RADIO

Bill O’Reilly: 'Be cautioned' if you think Hunter Biden story is enough to nail Joe

Bill O'Reilly is back! He joins Glenn to discuss the second — and last — presidential debate of the campaign season and he comments on whether or not Trump did enough to convince the average, uninformed voter of Joe's blatant corruption overseas. O'Reilly explains the origin of the Democrat narrative on Russian interference, why moderator Kristen Welker tried to stay off the Ukraine topic, and whether or not he believes Joe will be taken down by stories that mostly center on his son, Hunter.