Who is Simon Sinek?

Glenn and Jason find out more about Simon Sinek's roots.

RADIO

Glenn: The DESTRUCTION of eternal truth is hurting YOUR kids

Comedian Chelsea Handler embarrassingly admitted on a recent appearance on the The Tonight Show With Jimmy Fallon that she didn’t know the moon and the sun were ‘not the same thing’ until she was 40-years-old. But it gets even worse. In this clip, Glenn details another, more sinister story that demonstrates how eternal truths are being not only ignored by world elites, but DESTROYED by them as well. And YOUR kids are being affected by it all. Our kids are confused, Glenn says, and it’s time we figure out how to help them before it’s too late.

RADIO

Glenn: Biden’s most recent LIES are 'DISTORTING' OUR HISTORY

President Biden took time on Sunday to remember Martin Luther King Jr., which is ironic, considering how much the far-left vehemently fights against so many principles that MLK preached. During his speech, Biden spewed SEVERAL LIES, some of which are ‘gravely' distorting American history, Glenn says. In this clip, Glenn goes through the most recent Biden lies. He questions why SO MANY (especially in the media) are so quick to ignore them, and he urges YOU to stand for truth in your own, personal circles now more than ever. Why? Because ‘you are the keeper of the flame of liberty,’ Glenn explains. ‘And right now, [for] most of us, that flame is either out…or there is just a few embers of coal left.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Well, it was good to see the president out celebrating Martin Luther King day. I don't know how I feel about all of this, because I'm not sure if it's politically correct to like him, except on Martin Luther King Day. You know, are other days acceptable?

I'm not sure. Because he said, you should judge people by the content of your character. And now everybody is saying, Martin Luther King was wrong.

So I don't -- do I drive on his street? His boulevard today? Or not. I don't know.

STU: They seemingly, typically, don't say Martin Luther King was wrong. They say, the things Martin Luther King said, they'll say content of the character, not the color of the skin.

They'll say that idea is wrong. But they typically will just stand by and act as if they didn't say those things.

They like having the brand name of Martin Luther King.

GLENN: Right. If you act like, he didn't say these things. And put other things around him. Eventually, people will feel like he didn't say those things.

Isn't that great? That didn't really work for Joe Biden. Because he's been saying things for a long time, that are absolutely not true.

Here he's talking at church yesterday, about two political heroes, that he had his entire life.

BIDEN: Inspired by one of my only political heroes. I've been saying, and I've been saying it for years. I have two political heroes my entire life. And I started off as a 22-year-old kid in the east side, in the civil rights movement. And got elected to the United States Senate when I was 29. I wasn't old enough to take office.

And I had two heroes.

GLENN: Got it.

BIDEN: Bobby Kennedy. I admired John Kennedy. But I could never picture them at my kitchen table.

But I could Bobby -- and Dr. King. Dr. King.

GLENN: Dr. King.

Okay. He's 22. And one of his heroes was Dr. King.

No malarkey.

STU: So malarkey was not the hero?

GLENN: I don't know who malarkey was.

STU: He was not the hero.

GLENN: It was Martin Luther King.

Then he talks about, how Martin Luther King so influenced his life. That he kept fighting. Apartheid, South Africa. He was there on the front lines.

Listen.

You and I took on apart side in South Africa. And a whole lot else. They didn't want to see him coming.

GLENN: They didn't want to see him coming. And he knows because Andy was there. And he was there. And Andy will tell you the truth. Now, there's something else about his childhood, that you probably don't know, that you should.

I mean, he's a practicing Catholic. And he would go to church every morning. However, he went above and beyond. Listen to this. Here he is.

BIDEN: I may be a practicing Catholic, I used to go to 7:30 mass every morning in high school, and then on into college before I went to the black church.
(laughter)
Not a joke. Andy knows this.

GLENN: Not a joke. Not a joke.

He would go to church and then he would go to a black church.

That's pretty amazing. And then in the middle of his Martin Luther King speech, he saw a little girl in the front, and just had to stop. It wasn't awkward or anything.

BIDEN: So many young people are going to do so much more than we ever were going to. What's your name, honey? Well, it's good to see you. Maybe I can have a picture with you, before I leave, is that all right?

GLENN: Oh. That's really creepy. Thank you. But then he's right back into the speech. And I think this really says it all.

BIDEN: Hearing these words, and I quote. It took just one generation from segregation to the Supreme Court of the United States, end of quote.

Those are the words of Ketanji Brown Jackson, our Supreme Court justice.

GLENN: Uh-huh.
(applauding)

BIDEN: Took just one generation of segregation to the Supreme Court.

GLENN: You're right. It took only one generation to get there. To get there.

That is great. Who was -- because she's our first black Supreme Court justice, right? A

STU: No.

GLENN: No?

STU: No.

GLENN: Who was our first --

STU: Well, there's another one currently on the Supreme Court. We can start there.

GLENN: Oh, wait a minute. So he was on the Supreme Court?

But he was on our first. That was back in the '80s. No. No, he's not.

Will you look it up?

Because I'm pretty sure, it had to be Clarence Thomas was the first.

No. You got to look it up. Because -- and I don't think we really count Clarence Thomas, as a black person. You know.

STU: No?

GLENN: No. No.

I'm pretty sure we would have to say, the first one was Ketanji Brown Jackson. What?

STU: You mean --

GLENN: Yes. Right. That lady.

STU: That guy. Lady. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Okay. Who was the first --

STU: Thurgood Marshall.

GLENN: Thurgood Marshall. Wow, that's a good old-timey name. When was Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court? Had to be a generation after the civil rights movement, right?

Because it was just one generation from the civil rights, right to the Supreme Court.

Which, if you're doing that, that would be Clarence Thomas. But that would leave out Thurgood Marshall.

STU: 1967 to 1991.

GLENN: 1967 was Thurgood Marshall. So that's not even a generation. That's like ten minutes after the civil rights movement. Why -- why? Why?

Why?

Seriously, why? It took America, really, ten minutes to -- not a whole generation. A guy who was most likely. I don't know enough about Thurgood Marshall. But most likely a part of the civil rights movement.

And he's there. He's on the scene.

He's an attorney. He's qualified, but no way he's going ton a Supreme Court justice. Because he's a black man.

And America says, you know, enough of this. And boom! There's a black man on the Supreme Court.

Why are they making this like it's just happening now? Like he's taking a victory lap. I want everybody to know. Not only was I there. Which he wasn't. Not only was I in South Africa, which he wasn't.

But I also am the guy who brought it all home. We've waited a full generation. Not true.

What is this -- why? Why?

Why are we putting up with this?

Why?

We know it's not true. Do you think that the truth has no consequence?

I mean, the lies have no consequence. If you speak lies over and over and over again, what did that just do?

That distorted our history.

Gravely distorted our history.

Everybody will say, well, he didn't go to the black church. And he didn't even meet these guys that he's saying he met.

What are you -- I mean, he has been called on this over and over and over again. All of the people involved are like, no. It's not true.

It's not. Even the church he was speaking at, pastor is like, no. That's not true. Andy knows it. Nah. Andy is here to say, nope.

STU: I see what you're doing. You're trying to cover for George Santos.

George Santos, who is obviously, the number one guy. He's been in a leadership position for -- in our lives for many, many minutes, and you're trying to cover. This is what I'm amazed about here.

The New York Times wrote another, I don't know. Three stories this weekend about George Santos? A guy, who -- does anyone know who George Santos is?

GLENN: Yeah, I thought maybe it was just me. I know I know the name. And I'm like, who the hell is George Santos?

STU: He was the guy recently elected in New York. He just got sworn into office.

And he fabricated parts of his resume.

And this has been non-stop coverage from the New York Times for weeks and weeks and weeks and weeks.

They want this guy to resign. He lied about where he worked. He lied about committing a crime when he was 19 years old in Brazil.

All these things.

And yet this guy, Joe Biden, continued to go of up in front of church after church after church, and tell this completely fabricated story over and over and over again.

They have fact-checked this with people who were in the church at the time.

Everybody who was there. No one remembers him being there. The guy he says was pastor, wasn't even pastor, when he's telling this story.

All of this is going on. He's the president.

The president of the United States does this all the time, the New York Times does not care. And then they've written 78 articles about George Santos.

How is this possible? How can they be so transparent about this?

How can they be so transparent about all of their lies?

GLENN: No. Nobody -- see, here's the thing: I was going to say, nobody cares.

But that's not entirely true. I think the majority of America actually cares, but they don't care about all of the politics that go with it.

And they're no longer going to care about things they think no one is going to correct. No one is going to pay for it. You know, oh, Joe Biden. He lied about this. And now he's -- now he's going to give away all of our money. And, you know, it was all based on. Whatever.

It's unconstitutional.

He can't do that. Yeah. I don't really care. That's what the average person says. I don't really care. Now, when indeed, they actually do. They just don't think it will change anything. And so they're like, I'm not putting any of my time or energy in any of this.

That is exactly what I told you Obama was trying to do to us, in 2008.

Do you remember when the news cycle all of a sudden became breathless? Where it was like thing after thing after thing, and you couldn't keep up with it?

It hasn't stopped since 2008. Well, that's what you're feeling. They've worn you out, on look at that double standard.

They've worn you out on absolutely everything, nothing ever changes. The Republicans are part of it. They get into office.

Nothing changes. They do the same thing. It is natural for humans to go, well, why the hell do I even care?

It's not going to change anything.

Imagine the people in Phoenix. Imagine the people in Arizona.

Who actually believe that it was stolen from them.

Okay? Two times in a row. Stolen from them. Do you think they'll care about voting next -- next time?

Which is the worst thing that could possibly happen. This is why I'm giving you this. The worst thing that could happen is you go, I'm not voting -- I don't really care. It's not going to change. They're just stealing it. If you retreat, it's over. It is officially over.

If you see this, and you're like, this guy is lying, over and over again.

You may not get him, you know, kicked out of office. You're not going to change the media's mind, but you have to stand as a sentinel of truth in your own life and in your own sphere of influence. Because we can't let these things just become true. And they will become true, if no one stands to challenge them. And I'm not saying you're going to win nationally, you've got to win in your own homes.

You've got to keep -- you are the keeper of the flame of liberty. And right now, most of us, that flame is either out for most Americans, or there is just a few embers of coal left.

You've got to blow that back into life, in yourself.

I'm not saying, that you have to worry about every single thing, and politics. Because I'm tired of it.

I have resigned myself. I really believe, the Lord is the only one that can work this out. So when I say that, I'm not like, you handle it, Lord. I'm going to vacation. Oh, he's got it. He's got it. I'm just going to go to a movie.

No. I believe the only thing that will save our nation, is God almighty. And it is going to happen in a Biblical sized miracle in the end.

And he'll get credit for it. But I will tell you, that ain't going to happen if we all just go our own way and do nothing.

We have got to stand up and just say, hey, just want to let you all know. I mean, want to post this from Joe Biden on Martin Luther King day, happy birthday. Or, you know -- was it? It's not officially his birthday. But happy Martin Luther King day. Isn't this actually -- no. I think it was Washington's day or something.

But, anyway, you know. Happy Martin Luther King day. I still believe in the words of the Declaration of Independence, which Martin Luther King called America back to.

This stuff, from Joe Biden, is a lie. I'm not saying it.

CNN said it.

CNN said it.

You know, they said it once.

RADIO

4 World Economic Forum ‘theories’ that just might be TRUE

The Associated Press (and pretty much every other mainstream media source) is working hard to convince the world that unfavorable claims made about the World Economic Forum are ‘conspiracy theories.’ Hmm. In this clip, Glenn gives you the information to decide for yourself: Are these just fabricated stories peddled by online commentators, or is there actually truth behind all the “theories” that the far-left wants you so badly to ignore?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Let me give you this story, from the Associated Press. When some of the world's wealthiest and most influential figures gather at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting last year, sessions on climate change drew high-level discussions on topics such as carbon financing and sustainable food systems. But an entirely different narrative played out on the internet. Where social media users claimed leaders wanted to force the population to eat insects instead of meat. In the name of saving the environment.

Oh, by the way, I should point this out. In a completely unrelated story, I just saw this as I was doing some research on another story in Canada. And I came across -- you can find it. Canadian manufacturing.com. Some really good news.

Aspire food group has announced that it has completed construction of its alternative protein manufacturing facilities in London, Ontario, which is now home to the world's largest cricket production facility.

Aspire's new plant will reportedly produce 9,000 metric tons of crickets every year for human and pet consumption. That's about 2 billion insects to be distributed annually across Canada and throughout the United States.

Now, I don't know about you, but I've been waiting for a plant to make 9,000 metric tons of crickets. The demand is going crazy for -- I hear it all the time.

People -- my friends here in Texas. We're all talking. Hey, do you have any crickets? I'm out of crickets. The supply line for crickets.

But the good news is: Aspire food group has completed their production facility. They're ready now to just start sending out the crickets. What was I talking about? Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. Elites arrive in Davos. And conspiracy theories align. Blah, blah.

Some conspiracy theorists force the population in Essex. The annual event in the Swiss Ski Resort Town of Davos which opens today, has increasingly become a target of bizarre claims. From a growing chorus of commentators, who believe the forum involves a group of elites, manipulating global events for their own benefit.

Experts say, that it was once a conspiracy theory, found in the internet's underbelly. But now it has hit the mainstream.

One of the things, that apparently these conspiracy theorists are talking about. Is how the World Economic Forum, had The Great Reset, ready to go. And were part of the, you know, WHO, and all of the plans, to shut down the economies of the world, when it came to a -- you know, some sort of a pandemic.

And then people started with those conspiracy theories. And the World Economic Forum, you know, started warning, misinformation. You have to control that misinformation.

And they did. Hey. I -- I'm sorry. I'm so riddled with ADD. You know, that cricket story, I was just telling you about. The reason why I was looking up at Canada and seeing things up in Canada. Was because there's -- there's a story up in Canada. That is out today.

Danielle Stephanie Warner. She was sitting alone in a Toronto Hospital. She was wearing a blue medical gown. And she was sitting in kind of like a wheelchair. And she has her mask down, off of her face. But that's because she went to the hospital, because she was having a hard time breathing.

So she couldn't have the mask, over her face. She didn't have COVID, by the way. But she couldn't put the mask over her face, because she couldn't breathe.

But, you know, hey, rules are rules. So the nurse came out, started yelling at her. And then two security guards came.

In fact, we have a little film of it. There you see Danielle, if you happen to be watching on TheBlaze. Here comes the nurse to yell at her. You've got to put that mask on your face. She's like, I can't breathe.

So the security guards are given gowns. And the security guards push her up against the wall along with the nurse. And they pin her against the wall. You know, putting her arm against her chest, kind of in a George Floyd sort of way. There they are, wheeling her dead body in the wheelchair, with such class.

She died. She died.

STU: Of COVID?

GLENN: No, no, no, no.

She died of COVID-related issues, but don't worry. There's nobody -- I'm sorry. I have to get back to this economic story. There is nobody trying to take your rights away. That's not happening.

And the World Economic Forum, and the world leaders, they haven't been doing the -- I mean, can you think of a time, when all world leaders were doing the same thing?

Where every country, was doing exactly the same thing?

I mean, sure, they all said, it's The Great Reset. Sure, they all said, Build Back Better, which is from the World Economic Forum. But can you think?

I mean, look at how different every country reacted to COVID, and nobody lost their rights. Sure, in China.

But nowhere else. Anyway, so now increasingly, in mainstream corners of the internet, and conservative talk shows. Stu, I think they're talking about you.

The Great Reset has become shorthand for what skeptics say, is a reorganization of society, using global uncertainty as a guise to take away rights. Now, why would you say that?

Why would you say that? That is crazy.

Yes. They put out their own video, made by them. That said, by 2030, you'll own nothing.

You will not have privacy. But you'll like it.

I mean, what rights are you talking about taking away?

By the way, you know, I got to be careful what I say here. Because you say that words, The Great Reset on YouTube. And they -- they take you off of YouTube, because you can't say those things. Oh, I'm on YouTube now. The Great Reset. The Great Reset. The Great Reset. Sucks, doesn't it?

Now, I can't imagine -- for instance, let me -- let me give you this conspiracy theory. That it was just from right-wingers. Okay?

Remember the right-winger, Richard Trumka, last week, last Sunday. Why are you looking confused?

STU: Well, Richard Trumka was an Obama-era --

GLENN: Yeah, but he's spreading conspiracy theories now, so he is clearly a right-wing zealot.

So he comes out, and he says, you know, as a consumer protection agency guy, we are now looking at gas stoves. Because there's this really credible source out there, that did a study. That says gas stoves can lead to asthma in kids.

And so, we're -- we're going to -- we're going to look at opening it up to public comments, should we restrict or ban gas stoves.

Well, of course, this was Republican scare tactics.

I mean, they're not going to do it.

There is no intention of doing it.

And nobody is suggesting this. Nobody is.

Well -- well, okay. The Department of Energy, okay. I mean, they're looking for efficiency standards. Gas furnaces. They're going to try to get rid of gas furnaces. And there's a not yet released proposed rule for water heaters, that will tilt away from gas.

STU: I bet Republicans are going to pounce on that too. When that comes out.

GLENN: It's just like them. It's just like them. And, you know, who did the study?

I mean, this is -- I mean, how do you question this study?

The green energy group, behind the study. The study. You know, cited by Richard Trumka Jr. to just look into banning gas stoves. That's all he was doing. Is partnered with the Chinese government. And their goal is an economy-wide transformation away from oil and gas.

Now, it's a Colorado base group, from -- it's a nonprofit. The Rocky Mountain institute. And it published the study, that attributes 13 percent of US childhood asthma cases to gas stove use.

But they don't really get into how they came up with that, in the study. But don't worry about that.

The organization is demanding systematic changes to the economy-wide total transformation to address climate crisis. And this group says, we have to -- you know, we have to go to great lengths to avoid the climate crisis.

In 2013, they went the long way. They have joined forces with China's national development and reform commission.

Which is great! And China went into business with them. And then, you know, some of the things didn't work out.

And they -- you know, the traffic lights had to be dimmed. And nobody could cook on their stoves.

But -- but that was just the first trial, okay?

Now, they advocate the banning of gas stoves.

They advocate the banning of gas stoves.

Okay.

The study, which spans nine paragraphs, was based on a bunch of hodgepodge different data. And methodologies spanning various years and countries.

And really, nobody can really make sense of it. The -- the -- the experts at Yale University, say, yeah. It's a little more than questionable. The way they put this together.

STU: No.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Now, I just -- I just want to tell you, that you should not worry.

When we have a government official citing something, you know, like this study, it's from Colorado. What could possibly be wrong?

Now, I will say, I will say, that they have a board of directors. But look how strong the board of directors are.

Board members, We Ding (phonetic) -- who doesn't love We Ding?

STU: That's a sentence I've --

GLENN: We Ding, that's a name.

STU: Oh.

GLENN: He's the founder and chairman of the Chinese equity firm, Broad River Capital.

He started the firm, after serving as chairman of the China International Capital Corporation. It's a state-owned investment bank.

And the executives, Chinese leader Xi Jinping's vice president, right-hand man, Wayne Keyson (phonetic). And they have deep participation in China's economic reforms and development. And their goal is to serve the nation.

Rocky Mountain Institute also sits on China Clean Transportation partnership. A Chinese green energy nonprofit, whose founding members include China's National Developing Reform Commission and Ministry of Transport.

So they -- yes. Yes. Yes. They're deeply in bed with communist China.

And, you know, who wins, if the United States gets off of oil and gas and China doesn't?

Okay. China.

What does our president -- you know, his son in bed with chain. Who got the Bagram Air Force Base after we -- okay. China.

But I'm sure this is all just because gas stoves are very dangerous. Very, very dangerous.

And it's a conspiracy anyway. It's not happening. Okay?

STU: It's all Republicans thrusting this issue into the culture wars.

GLENN: Right. Right.

And they don't have any power. World economic power. No power at all. They're skiing this week. That's what they're doing. They're skiing. Man, it's just a bunch of rich people getting together. Get over it. It's not going to affect your life.

Man, when do those bugs start to arrive in America? I can't wait.

Oh, there's another story out today. Coincidentally has nothing to do with anything. Wall Street Journal says, the central bank digital currency, where you'll have a -- a bank account with the Federal Reserve, yeah, that's coming, whether you like it or not.

Because we just have to do it. But that's a conspiracy. It's not going to happen.

RADIO

Why did Team Biden ‘discover’ the classified documents NOW?

More classified documents were discovered over the weekend at another home of President Joe Biden (…how many homes does he HAVE?!). Attorneys for the president discovered the files when sent to the house to pack things up. But why were lawyers sent to pack up items? Why does it seem like the Biden Administration was aware of these documents the entire time? And if that is true, why did they decide to ‘discover’ them NOW? Is there more to this mysterious timeline? In this clip, Glenn answers all of these questions plus more. And, he’ll dive even more into this topic during his upcoming Glenn TV special this Wednesday at 9pm ET on BlazeTV.com.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So Kevin McCarthy, he's come out and said, the discovery of more classified documents in President Joe Biden's possession, oh, that highlights the hypocrisy inside the federal government. Yeah, okay. Yeah, it does do that. It does. But is this new?

Haven't we always said this is this

Think of Donald Trump.

I mean, I could go back in time. Think of Ronald Reagan would have done that. Think of Eisenhower. If he would have done that.

I mean, you could go all the way -- think of Lincoln, if he would have done that. This is the same story. It's the same story.

We got it.

Now, why is this story happening? Well, let me give you -- they found more documents over the weekend. Now, remember, the White House said, we're absolutely done with documents.

They found every -- they found more over the weekend. At another house.

How many houses -- this guy is like Ronald McDonald. Ronald McDonald is constantly building another Ronald McDonald House.

How many houses does that clown need? How many houses does the president need?

He's got to have more houses. So they went to another house. And they went, oops. Okay. It's not exactly over, but these documents really don't matter.

Okay. All right. Well, they're classified documents. So I'm pretty sure that would matter.

Now, they went to Wilmington, and -- and when I say they, they went to Wilmington and Rohobeth HEP Beach. That's where his other house is.

And when I say they, I mean the same people that went to, you know, his foundation with the university.

So who are they? His attorneys. Now, this started back in -- what was it? November, or October?

Where the president's attorneys went to his office to pack up stuff and -- and close that office.

His attorneys. Now, that is the world's most expensive moving company. Okay?

Why would you have your attorneys do that?

Well, I could provide a thesis. Let's say, you know, you have something you shouldn't have. And maybe eudone something you shouldn't have done.

You go to your attorneys, first. Because to them, you don't have to say, I know this guy. What you say to them is, you guys can't talk, right?

I mean, legally, everything I say to you, you can't repeat it, right?

Right. Good.

I've got all these top secret documents, okay? There's a bunch of them over there. There might be a bunch of them -- I mean, I think I might have some of them in Sandy Berger's socks. I don't know. So if you guys go in there, and you find them, just do what you have to do, I don't want to know about it.

Okay. The president has said last week, the attorneys told me, you know, do not even ask about. Oh.

Hmm. Did you guys talk about it before they said that to you?

So the attorneys go in. They find it. And they immediately call and cooperate.

You know, that is big of Joe Biden.

Well, that's why he had the attorneys there. Now, go to his house. But I have it with my Corvette. Ah, yeah. We'll come back to them.

See, that is like the safest place on earth. You have an old Corvette?

I'm telling you, you can't break into -- the garage door opener. Nobody has one of those. Nobody has one of those.

You can't just -- and get in. Because the garage door opens.

It's locked.

You need some sort of like, I don't -- this is even beyond quantum computing, to be able to get past one of those Sears garage door openers.

So we're going to come back to that one. So then his other house, this weekend. After it's all out in the open, his attorneys are there at the other house.

Now, I don't know why they haven't done all of the places they could look. You know, at once. Maybe in November.

Hey, we found him in the basement. You have any, you know, next to your Corvette.

Well, there is that big box that says classified and has big red tape all over it. You know, we should probably go there. Do you have any other houses that -- I don't know why. I don't know why. But they're fully cooperating.

Okay. Now, let's ask two questions. Let's ask two questions.

When something says top secret, to get a top secret classification, what do they do, before you get that little card?

Stu.

STU: They usually do a background check.

GLENN: Background check. Okay. Good. Good. What are they looking for?

STU: Criminal activity. Some way you could be compromised.

GLENN: Compromised, sure.

Or, you know, I just toured the Soviet Union.

You know, they're looking for anything that you've done, that shows that you are on, let's say not America's side.

Or you have any friends that might be let's say, not on American side.

Or you have any business dealings, with some people, that let's just say, are not America's side. And then you also look -- final thing is, is he compromised with money? With drugs?

Is there a sex scandal? Is he -- is he prone to a honey pot thing? Okay. All right. That's what they're looking for.

Because you can so easily need money. And then somebody can come out and go, listen, I'm Boris, but I'm absolutely love America. And I just want to see the -- I want to see top secret document, pause I want to show you how American I am.

I'll never say anything to Soviet Union.

Okay. All right. That guy could approach you and go, so you need a little money, maybe. A little heroin. Okay. I can help.

But I want to see top secret document.

That's what they're worried about. Okay.

Now, wait a minute. This isn't the president or vice president's house at the time, he was the vice president. And he had them there, while he was vice president. And then he kept them there, while he was president. Okay. So they've been in there for a while. Who else has been in his house?

Oh, my gosh! A guy who is constantly asking for money for drugs and hookers. A guy who is doing shady business deals with China and with Russia. And Ukraine. Wait a minute. That's exactly the kind of guy we don't want to have access to top secret documents! Yeah. But he was almost never there.

Well, let's go back to that ultra secure garage. That's the house that Hunter Biden was renting from his dad. Not now with his art money. He was renting it from his dad, when he had no money. Remember?

I've got no money. That's why she's pregnant. I couldn't afford a condom. Oh, poor guy.

So his dad said, just stay at my house. I'm not living there. You just stay at my house.

Oh, my gosh. What a great dad. And he wanted to make sure, that his son grew up a little bit. And you'll have to work for it, a little bit. You know, this house. The most expensive rent in this area, is $6,000 a month.

So I'm going to cut you a deal, because you're my son. You just pay $50,000 a month.

But, Dad, remember, I couldn't afford the condom.

Right. Well, this is a condominium. With more letters. Going to be a little more expensive.

$50,000 to his desperate son.

Now, where does his desperate, I don't have any money son get that money?

Oh, don't worry. He's got a job with like Burisma. He's doing deals over in China. Completely his deal. No big deal.

No big deal.

Joe Biden does not know a thing about it. Nothing. He's not getting any money from it. He's just trying to help out his poor wayward son. Giving him access to his house. So he has a place to rest his angelic head. While dad charges him $50,000 a month.

And what's in that house?

The boxes of top secret documents, right there, next to the garage.

So you don't need MacGyver. You don't need some genius to go, how do we break in, past that Sears robotic arm?

How do we do it?

Because you already have a drug addict inside. Who is writing his family going, yeah. At least dad doesn't take half your money. Remember? He's really bitter and angry with his dad, at that time. He wants his dad to suffer.

Hmm. So what Boris has to do? Hey. I hear you're unhappy about Dad, huh? Hey. Are those little top secret documents. You know, what would be fun, I give you more money. We say, you work in gas industry.

So why is this all coming out now?

Why did -- why did the attorneys go in to look for all of these documents? Why are they turning them in?

And it's good news, right? That we have a special counsel. Of course, it is. It's a very good thing. I'll tell you right now, you say the Justice Department is corrupt. I've employed a special counsel on it.

Oh, good. Let me tie this all up in a nice little bow for you, in 60 seconds.

Unfortunately, some of the best tech innovations out there, also represent the most danger from cyber criminals. Take Bluetooth, for instance. It's a great choice for sharing information between devices, but it's also easy to hack.

So anything -- you got personal information out there, yeah, don't worry about it.

No. Joe Biden. You know what, you have personal information, just keep it in a garage next to an old Corvette, and you'll be fine. Or maybe LifeLock.

They are top of the line in cyber security. They have both preventive measures to keep you safe. And because nobody can stop everything.

Because it's kind of a fast moving crime syndicate.

Wow. Kind of like our government. They also have a restoration team, that will clean up the mess, if your information is hacked into. Don't you wish we had a restoration team, I don't know, in the Congress?

I want you to join now, and save to 25 percent off your first year with the promo code Beck. Call 800LifeLock. 1-800-LifeLock or you can go LifeLock.com. Use the promo code Beck. Either 1-800-LifeLock or LifeLock.com. Save 25 percent. LifeLock.com.

Promo code Beck. Ten seconds. Station ID.
(music)

GLENN: Okay. So let's tie this up in a bow. You have the lawyers, special counsel, the House, Hunter Biden. And innocent. Looking like a little puppy dog with big sad eyes, Joe Biden. Okay. Here's what's going on: Back in November, I remember reading a lil story. Lil, as Tom Broadkaw used to say. A lil story about how Joe Biden's White House was now preparing for the onslaught of the Republicans who were going to possibly win Congress, and they needed to have all these attorneys ready to go.

So they were already working up things. Okay.

Sidebar, put that off to the side for a second.

Why would you have your attorneys do this, when you know you're going to look like a hypocrite?

Well, you might want to do that with your attorneys, so you could tell the attorneys everything that, you know, what's going on, and they can't say anything.

And they could clean up this mess, and make it old news, by the time it's used in a case against Hunter Biden. We know this.

They already brought those out. And they were cooperating every step of the way.

We already know that Hunter Biden was paying his father $50,000 a month. And he rented a house where all those documents were. But it was crazy. His dad was, you know, vice president. He has a wayward son.

He was just trying to help him out. That's why we appointed a special counsel. Oh, no. Wait a minute. What was it that I heard from the worst spokesman at the White House ever, on this question?

Play it again, Sam. Play it again, Sam. Play it -- play it again, Sam. Okay.

VOICE: Does this episode undercut that argument? That he would restore confidence? Because here we have in the headlines that he is now under investigation.

VOICE: He's restored independence in the Department of Justice. That's what we're doing here. When we're saying we're going to refer you to the Department of Justice, that is restoring independence as it relates to --

GLENN: Oh, stop for a second.

So the only reason why a special counsel was appointed, was to restore America's confidence in the system.

And it has nothing to do with now Joe Biden, his attorneys, his spokespeople, saying, I cannot comment on this anymore.

I refer you to the Department of Justice. Well, normally, when they would say that, imagine if it was Abraham Lincoln and they did this. There would be leaks. Abraham Lincoln.

He's under investigation. But here's the stuff our inside sources tell us.

This time, there won't be those leaks.

So you've effectively now shut down the story. Well, they they got somebody super special on the case. Yeah. Inspector gadget.

We needed inspector gadget, because he's the only guy to figure out whether you could have a Corvette and a serious car opener and get into the place. Uh-huh. That's what's going on. This is all just pretrial maneuvering. Preinvestigative maneuvering. By the White House. To make this, we've heard this before.

That's just old news.

Yet all of these things cleared up, so they can say, I'm not talking about old news.

I'm talking about what's happening today. This president needs to concentrate on what's going on for the American people.

That's exactly what's happening. And if you would like more evidence of it, join me on Wednesday.

Because Wednesday, on my Wednesday night special on Blaze TV, I line all of this out.

It's pretty clear, when you look at it. Hmm.

Too bad nobody in the media is looking at it. It's weird. Neither is Kevin McCarthy. I can't believe the double standard of the media. You go get them, Kevin.