RADIOApril 13, 2022

Brooklyn suspect PROVES government's anti-conservative BIAS

The suspect potentially responsible for injuring several inside a Brooklyn subway station on Tuesday is far from a white-supremacist. In fact, he posted dozens of videos on social media in recent years railing against white people who, he said, ‘commit genocide against one another.’ He likely is battling significant mental issues, but this man further PROVES how our government’s efforts to frame conservative Americans as a serious threat is yet another falsehood they’ll continue to push. So, for those conservatives who feel the government, the nation, or our systems are stacked against you, Glenn has some advice: ‘Don't listen to anybody who says you can't do it. Don't listen to anybody who is saying the whole world is against you. No it’s not.’

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: All right. So last Friday, Homeland Security secretary, Alejandro Mayorkas, declared -- it's not Alejandro Mayorkas. I got to be able to do that. Now, Pat can really do that well, you know. When you're watching TV and somebody who is as white as I am, and then Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, declared white supremacists and domestic violence extremism to be the most prominent threat currently facing our country. The timing couldn't have been more perfect because just a few hours later, a jury in Grand Rapids, Michigan, exposed the Justice Department's largest alleged domestic terrorism case in the last 18 months as a failed FBI entrapment scheme, designed to smear conservatives as white supremacists, ahead of the 2020 election. This article is from the -- the Federalist, I think. Yes. The Federalist. By refusing to convict four men accused of plotting to kidnap and kill Michigan governor Whitmer before election game, the Grand Rapids jury seemed to side with the defense attorneys who argued their clients weren't domestic terrorists, but entrapped by FBI agents and at least a dozen informants who planned and funded the kidnapping operation. The key to the government's plan was to turn general discontent with Governor Whitmer's COVID-19 restrictions into a crime that could be prosecuted, defense lawyers wrote. The government picked what it knew would be a sensational charge.

Conspiracy to kidnap the governor. And when the government was faced with evidence, showing that the defendants had no interest in the kidnapping plot, it refused to accept failure, and continued to push its plan.

Now, what's interesting about this, the guy who was interested in overseeing this plot, has been transferred. He was transferred to Washington DC, giving a promotion. And he's the guy overseeing the January 6 plot.

Okay. So the FBI is very, very, very busy. Because they know white supremacists. That's what's coming for everybody, okay. Be careful. You may not be white enough. Because I hear, it's an albino mob. Okay? And the first sign. That's why I'm wearing pink contacts right now. First sign you're not really an albino. Oh, they burn a -- it's not Arab -- it's like a hexagon in your front yard. Yeah. Yeah. They're -- I don't know what the hexagon has to do. But it's not a cross.

It's another symbol for not being albino. A hexagon. Anyway, so the FBI is looking for these crazy, white, white, white, really white, almost pinkish white extremists. And that may be why they missed Frank R. James. Now, Frank R. James, not an albino. He's, quote, a troubled man. Who railed against mayor Adams. And made bizarre, threatening rants on YouTube. Huh. So YouTube. He had a page on YouTube. Where he was saying crazy things. Like --

STU: Did you? I heard this from a lot of sources yesterday. That he was making bizarre, angry, violent, racist threats.

GLENN: Well, yeah. But...

STU: And before they released the picture, man, they seemed to make that broad enough tip. It's almost as if they wanted you to think of a particular person, perhaps an albino.

GLENN: Damn albinos, they're out of control. My apology to the one or two albinos who are not extremist.

STU: The albinos are not sending their best. They're not sending their best across the border.

GLENN: They're not. They're roving --

STU: But it was amazing -- they didn't say it was anti-white racism, probably because they've spent the last ten years telling us, it's not possible. Reverse racism isn't real. It's not possible. It can't occur. So how does this guy have racist rants in the first place?

GLENN: So he said things, like, it's just a matter of time before these black MFers decide, hey, listen, enough is enough. And these white people need to go. Oh, no, wait. It's the exact opposite of that! It's just a matter of time before those white MFers decide, enough is enough. These N-words have to go, on YouTube as of yesterday. These white MFers, this is what they do. Ultimately, at the end of the day, they kill and commit genocide against one another. What do you think they will do to your black ass in and what are you going to do? You're going to fight? And guess what, you're going to die. Because unlike Zelinsky and Ukraine, nobody has your back. The whole world is against you. And you're against F-ing yourself. So why should you be alive again? That's the question. Why should an N-word be alive on this planet? Besides to pick cotton or to chop sugar cane or tobacco.

Now, this is allowed on YouTube. But my -- some of my opinions on the lab leak, for covid, banned. But this is allowed. I just want to say, that's interesting. And we all agree. I think we would all agree, this guy is crazy. He's crazy. But isn't that what the press and social media have been telling us, that us crazy white conservatives are doing, to the crazy people in our audience. Winding them up. It only takes one crazy person that happens to be listening. Where did he get the idea, the whole world is against you? Why should you be alive? Why should an N-word be alive on this planet, besides to pick cotton or chop sugar cane or tobacco? No one has your back. Because that's almost the progressive bumper sticker.

STU: It's just a message of despair.

GLENN: Despair.

STU: It's just telling a large portion of the country, they will never be successful, unless, of course, their white savior of Democratic politician steps in to bail them out of their terrible, terrible times, with these evil conservatives.

GLENN: Let me tell you this. I cannot say this to you, and make this promise, like I could have ten years ago. Ten years ago, I would have said to you, you can do anything. Anything. You can break all barriers. This isn't the 1950s. And I speak -- I speak from experience. As a guy that was the first to go to college, and couldn't afford it in my 30s, more than one semester. There's nobody in my family that was college educated. I'm in it. I built it. I went against the system. The system I came into talk radio making fun -- correct me if I'm wrong -- making fun of talk radio. I went into television, making fun of television. Breaking all of the rules. Doing it my way. Not the way, everybody else. Then, when they didn't accept, we built a network, the first network no one had ever done it. HBO wasn't even on yet, on the internet, with live streaming. We were the first -- I'm sorry. Major League Baseball was the first. We were the second into the boat. And look at it.

Now, I'm not the smartest guy in the world. I mean, if you've listened, you know. But what I have is a belief in myself. I have a belief in common decency and common goodness. I have a belief in the system, that good guys don't always win. Good guys sometimes lose, but in the long run, that truth wins. And nobody really cares about your problems. You know why? Because everyone has their problems. And everybody has them of differing degrees. But everybody thinks that their problem is the biggest problem. You go in somebody's office, and you go, hey. I've got a real problem.

The boss is thinking, really? Really? You know what I'm dealing with today. You've got problems. Let me sit down in your office and tell you some problems. Okay? But they don't say that. Because their job is to listen to you. To help empower you.

Now, everybody has a problem. And they have to wear it on their sleeve. Now the system is so corrupt, that unless you have money, unless you have the right point of view, unless you vote the right way, I don't know if you can make it.

That's new for me. I've always been a champion of the underdog. In no other country, than this one. Now, I don't know. But I will tell you, we're still out blazing trails. We still are optimistic about our future. Maybe somewhat. Let me make you this promise: If you adhere to a universal moral code, if you adhere to do unto others, love thy neighbor, if you can accept Glenn Beck's top ten rules for life, formal called the Ten Commandments, you're going to be all right. You'll make it. You know why? Because you'll be on the side of God. The universal truth maker. And as long as you remain on his side, everything is going to work out. It may not be your dreams. I can't tell you, this isn't exactly what I planned. You know, when I started radio. This is not what I planned. In fact, this is nothing like I planned.

However, it's good. There are no mistakes. And no waste in God's universe. No waste. It's amazing how much you can screw up your life. And if you just put it on the right track, and stay with Glenn Beck's really good safety tips, formal known as the Ten Commandments. It's like amazing how all that wasted time. How all that wasted energy. How all those mistakes will be used, not by you. Not by him. Somehow or another, to put you right where you need to be. With all the skills that you needed.

Don't listen to anybody who says, you can't do it. Don't listen to anybody who is saying, the whole world is against you. No, it's not. No, it's not.

My goal is to be like -- what was the priest's name that was down in the basement of the concentration catches are. Remember? The guy was so positive all the time. They were like, okay. We just got to starve them all to death. They put them in the basement, and they got all the other prisoners to singing hymns. And now they really wanted to kill him. He was starving to death. He went blind from starvation. He was in so much pain. And yet, he was still singing. He was happy.

I want to be that happy. Minus the starving in the basement of the concentration camp. But I want to be that guy. He didn't think the world was against him. And, boy, he could have. He knew what was true. He knew the value of his own being.

THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

THIS is why self-reliance may be your ONLY protection from SLAVERY

Are you truly free, or is your life quietly controlled by systems most Americans never question? In this eye-opening conversation, Glenn Beck speaks with investigative journalist Whitney Webb about how the Elites, banks, and global systems have created modern forms of enslavement, all while the public remains largely unaware. They discuss the urgent need for local self-reliance, alternative financial systems, and taking personal responsibility to protect yourself and your family. This is a wake-up call for anyone who believes freedom is guaranteed, and it’s time to see the truth and act before it’s too late.

Watch Glenn Beck's FULL Interview with Whitney Webb HERE

Claire's warning: The dark side of gender care EXPOSED

Claire Abernathy was just 14-years-old when doctors told her parents she’d take her own life without hormones and surgery. They promised “gender care” would save her life. Instead, it left Claire with irreversible scars, broken trust, and a lifetime of regret. Her mom was told she was required to comply. No one ever addressed the bullying, or trauma Claire endured before being rushed into medical transition. Now, years later, both Claire and her mother are speaking out and exposing how families are misled, how doctors hide risks, and how children are left to pay the price. With federal investigations now underway, their story is a warning every parent needs to hear.

The most INSANE Deep State story you've never heard

Was an NGO with deep government ties trying to RESTART the opium trade in Taliban-run Afghanistan while former Taliban members were on its payroll...only to be caught DESTROYING the evidence?! The State Department's Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy Darren Beattie joins Glenn Beck to expose what he found when he was made Acting President of the United States Institute of Peace. Plus, he debunks ProPublica’s claim that DOGE “targeted” an “Afghan scholar who fled the Taliban.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Darren, welcome to the program. How are you? Darren, are you there? Is he there?

STU: Hmm.

GLENN: Okay. Check if he's there. Is he? Dick Cheney. Dick Cheney.

STU: Trying to shut him down. They don't want peace. They don't want peace.

GLENN: They don't. They don't.

He is -- he is a big-time anti-globalist. I've got to tell you, what we're doing with the State Department. I absolutely love. The State Department has been a big problem for this country for a very long time. It's what's gotten us into these global wars. These endless wars, and everything he is.

And, I mean, I don't know what happened to Marco rube, but he is tremendous.

And the way president Trump is appointing different people like Darren, it's fantastic. Darren, are you there? Darren.

STU: Something must be wrong with the lines. Because we are talking to him offline on the phone here. And it does seem to be working, but not coming through our broadcast board here for whatever reason.

GLENN: Well, let's see if we can get that fixed, and maybe let me just talk here for five, six minutes on something else. Then we'll take a break and come back and see if we can get him.

There's something else that I really want to talk about. And that is this flag-burning thing. Now, it's not an amendment.

This is something that the president is putting up in an executive order and has very little teeth to it.

But I -- I -- look, I understand. As a guy putting an enormous flagpole up at my house today.

I mean, an enormous flagpole.

I love the flag. I love it!

And there are a few things that make me more angry than see somebody you set our flag on fire.

For a lot of people, that's a punch in the gut, especially our military people. And it has been planted on distant battlefields. It's raced after victory. Saluted in the morning, or should be in our schools and folded and given to the hands of grieving families. It feels like spitting on every sacrifice, that ever made this nation possible. And the argument against flag burning is really simple: It dishonors the idea of all of that. Okay?

And it defends millions of people, including me. It disrespects, I think the veterans that bled. The families who mourned. The dream that binds us together.

However, here's the hard truth: Symbols only mean something, in a land where freedom is alive.

If you outlaw the burning of a flag, the you have placed the cloth above the Constitution that it represents. You have made the flag an idol.

We don't worship idols. If you can only praise the flag and never protest it, it just stops being a symbol of freedom. And starts being an idol of obedience.

Now, that's the argument for allowing it. At least to me.

Because the real strength of a free nation is -- is to -- it's -- it's how we protect, not the speech we love, but how we endure the speech we hate!

And the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. And, you know, they -- the line they drew wasn't an easy one. Freedom of speech, stops where it directly -- directly insights violence. And that's it same thing, kind of, in this executive order.

You can burn the flag. But if I'm not mistaken, but if it incites violence, then you're in trouble.

And that's true. But the bar of inciting violence is so incredibly high. And it's -- it doesn't have anything to do with speech that offends. It's not speech that stirs anger. Not speech that wants you to punch the speaker in the mouth. It's speech only, that provokes imminent and specific violence.

And unless it's that be with the government doesn't have any right to -- to get into the business of silencing speech. Ever. Ever. Ever.

It is a hard line. And that standard is really hard. It's painfully hard.

Because what our citizenship requires, this is civics. What our citizenships require, is that we defend -- oh, I hate this.

We defend the right of your opponent to mock everything that we hold sacred.

Now, I want you to think of this. You can burn a Bible. You can burn the Word of God. But some want to make it illegal to burn a flag. Where are our priorities? You can burn the Constitution. The words that actually are the ones that stir us into action. But you can't burn a flag.

You can't burn a Koran. Can't burn them. Can't. Can't.

You will -- you will quickly come to a quick end, not legally. But you will come to a quick end. I don't ever want to be like that. Ever!

You burn a Bible. I think you're a monster. What is wrong with you? What is wrong with you?

But you have a right to do it. Why are we drawing a line around the flag? It -- the reason is -- is because we feel things so passionately. And that is really a good thing, to feel love of country so passionately. But then we have to temper that. My father used to tell me, that I think this country needs to hear over and over again, every day. My father -- we would talk to somebody. And we would walk away. And he would go, I so disagree with everything that man just said. But, Glenn, son, he would say. I will fight to the death for his right to say it. He used to say that to me all the time. Which now lees me to believe, I know where I've got my strong opinions from. Because dad apparently would disagree with a lot of people all the time.

But that was the essence of freedom. That is the essence of what sets us apart. Standing for universal, eternal rights like free speech. It's not easy. It means you have to take the size of those people that offend you. It means -- it doesn't mean you have to disagree with it. You can fight against it. You can argue back and forth.

But you -- can you tolerate the insults to the things that you love most. That is so hard, and that is why most of the world does not have freedom of speech. It's too hard! But our Founders believed people are better than that. Our citizens can rule themselves!

And the only way you can rule yourself is if you don't have limits on freedom of speech. So the question is, do we want to remain free? Or do we want to just feel good? It really is that simple. It's why no one else has freedom of speech. It's too hard! I think we're up to the task. Okay. Give me 60 seconds. And then we will try again.

The -- there's certain moments in history, that test not just entire nations, but the hearts of those who live in the nations. And right now, the people of Israel are living in one of those moments. Sirens in the night. Families huddled together.

Elderly men and women. Who remember a time when help never came. All of them wonder. Is anybody going to stand with us, this time?

The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews exists to answer that question. They provide food, shelter, security, and hope. Real hope and help in the middle of a crisis! And every act of generosity from people like you sends a clear message. You are not alone. When you support the fellowship, you are joining hands with believers all around the world to lift up God's people, when they need it most. And it is a promise in action. It's a testimony that our faith isn't just words. It's love delivered right on time. And this is your chance to be part of something that really, truly matters. Something that is eternal. To stand shoulder to shoulder with Israel. And say, we're with you. We're not going to fight your wars. Not going to fund your wars. But we're with you. You have a right to live and exist in peace. To learn how you can help. Visit IFCJ.org. IFCJ.org. Go there now. IFCJ.org. Ten seconds. Back to the program.
(music)
All right. Let me -- let me bring Darren in. Darren, are you there now?

DARREN: Yes!
GLENN: Oh, God. Thank goodness.
Thank you for putting up with us. I don't know what happened with the phone system. But, first of all, tell me what the US Institute of Peace is. I've never even heard of it.

DARREN: That is a fantastic question. And I'll try to give the abbreviated answer, because I know we don't have several hours.

GLENN: Good. I know.

DARREN: But US Institute of Peace is one of lesser known, but quite important member of the NGO archipelago, that was created in the '80s. It belongs to the same cohorts as national endowments for democracy.

GLENN: Oh.

DARREN: And some other -- some other better known NGOs that really in the broad context of things. In kind of the sweep of things, was created as a kind of reorganization of the government structure in the aftermath of the church type committee hearings that expose a lot of the dirty dealings of government agencies such as the CIA, and so sort of a broader response to that government lie was to create this NGO layer of governance, with an armed distant plausible deniability, a kind of chameleon character of not exactly being government, not exactly being private, in order to fulfill some of those more sensitive functions that had been exposed in the course of the church hearings.

And so US Institute of Peace is one of those NGOs that had particular focus on conflict regions. But, of course, as I think you -- you suggested earlier, peace requires at the very least, an asterisk. Because there involves a lot of things, that conventional, most American citizens would not think should belong as part of the portfolio of something calling itself an institute of peace.

GLENN: So what was the thing with the -- with this Taliban member that was getting money from us?

DARREN: Right. So this is an interesting case. So there's a whole saga of a takeover of the US institute of peace under -- under DOGE.

And that's really a fascinating story unto itself. Just to give you a sense of what these characters were like. They barricaded themselves in the offices.

They sabotaged the physical infrastructure of the building. There were reports of there being loaded guns within the offices.

GLENN: Wow!

DARREN: There was one, like, hostage situation where they held a security guard under basically kind of a false imprisonment type situation. It was extremely intense.

Far more so than the better known story of USAID. And in the course of all of that, they tried to delete a terabyte of data, of accounting information that would indicate what kind of stuff they were up to.

What kind of people they were paying. And in the course of that, DOGE found that one of the people on their payroll. Was this curious figure, who had a prominent role in the Taliban government. And then seemed to kind of play a bunch of angles across each other.

Sort of one of these sixer types in the middle of Afghanistan.

The question is, what the heck is an organization like this, having an individual, who is a former Taliban member on their payroll.

It underscores how incredibly bizarre the whole arrangement is. And to just reinforce that. I think even more bizarre than having this former Taliban guy on the payroll is the kind of schizophrenic posture exhibited by the chief -- one truly bizarre thing is that one of the US Institute of Peace's main kind of policy agendas was basically lamenting the fact that the opium trade had dissipated under Taliban leadership. They had multiple reports coming out, basically saying, this is horrible, that the opium trade is diminished under the Taliban. Meaning, finding some way to restore it. How bizarre is that!

GLENN: What was their thinking?

DARREN: Well, it's -- it's very strange, and it depends on what kind of rabbit holes you want to go down. But the whole story of opium and Afghanistan and its connection to, you know, government entities, is a -- is a very intricate and delicate and fascinating one. But it seems very clear that the US Institute of Peace was involved in that story to some degree because their public reports. They had a full-the time guy of basically lamenting the fact that the opium trade dissipated under the Taliban. And, meanwhile, they're funding this former Taliban guy.

GLENN: Unbelievable. Now, ProPublica got this. And you have released the statement on it. And ProPublica just completely white-washed this -- said this guy was a victim, and his family was taken hostage. Was his family ever taken hostage because he was exposed?

And correct the ProPublica story, would you?

DARREN: Yeah, I mean, the ProPublica thing, as usual and as expected was a total joke.

GLENN: Yes.

DARREN: I mean, this guy, I'm not an expert on this particular person's history. But what's very clear is he was a former Taliban guy, and he was probably one of these people, who was playing all sides, made a lot of enemies. I know that there were several kind of attempts on his life by the Taliban, in the course of various -- various decades.

This has nothing to do with -- with DOGE.

I mean, he's a known quantity in the region.

And somebody who has made a lot of enemies.

And he was not -- he was on the payroll of the US institute of peace.

And nobody is expecting something like that. So then, and, again, there's this sort of hostile takeover situation.

Where the people are barricading he themselves in. Trying to delete all this data.

And sure enough, what's in the data, is stuff like this.

These random former Taliban guy, making his contract with $130,000.

GLENN: You know, this is the -- this is the real Deep State stuff, that I think bothers people so much.

Look, we expect our CIA to do stuff, we don't necessarily want to do it. We expect it.

When it's in the State Department.

When every department is pushing out money to NGOs to overthrow governments and everything else.

It's out of control!

It's just completely out of control.

And who is overseeing all of that.

DARREN: That's a great question.

I think part of the NGO -- UCEF was almost a cutout of a cutout.

A fourth of its money came from USAID.

In many ways, it was a cutout of USAID. Which itself was a cutout.

So there are many layers of distance. Plausible deniability.

And UCEF, I think institutionally really perfected this chameleon structure of being able to plausibly present itself as government. When that was convenient for what they were doing.

And also to present itself as a private organization, when that was convenient.

It's a very intricate setup that they had, that was truly optimized for this chameleon character of plausible denial operations. In conflict zones. Doing God knows what, with American taxpayer money.

And it's just an absolute hornet's nest.

We have recovered that terabyte that they tried to delete. And once we get things settled in the building itself, I intend to do a kind of transparency effort, whereby we release all of this material to the public.

GLENN: Good. Good.

DARREN: Just like I'm doing at the State Department. I'm currently acting as secretary at the State Department. And doing a transparency effort here. After I eliminated the global engagement center, which was sort of the internal censorship office within the State Department, decided, we've got to -- we've got to air this out to the public.

So within the next couple of weeks.

We'll have our next tranche of helps you of thousands of emails, documenting what this were doing.

GLENN: I would love you to go back on, through those emails.

I think you guys in the State Department are doing an amazing job. Thanks for being on.