RADIOJuly 22, 2022

DEBATE: Is Jill Biden actually WORSE than Hillary Clinton?

Glenn and Pat have a big disagreement to settle: Jill Biden or Hillary Clinton as the worst First Lady ever? Jill’s recent breakfast tacos comment in San Antonio was horrendous, but does that even compare to Benghazi?! In this clip, the guys debate each woman’s most cringeworthy qualities…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So Pat just said to me just higgledy-piggledy off the cuff the other day, we were on the air, and he said, you know, I think Jill Biden is the worst First Lady of my lifetime, she may be the worst ever. And I did have to say two words to him: Hillary Clinton. But he still stood by Jill Biden being the worst.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: So I would like to have a little debate.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: I've done my homework. I'm assuming you've done your homework on Jill Biden, on what makes her the --

PAT: Oh, extensive. Extensive homework.

GLENN: Extensive. This -- this really got me, Pat. I mean, hours, hours just brooding on this. How can Pat just possibly think that. So you want me to start or you to start?

PAT: Yeah. Go ahead. Ready to hear it. You should start with the death list.

GLENN: Yeah. I've got it. This is just my case that she is the ultimate hot sauce carrying, Saul Alinsky loving, warmongering, deplorable super predator that we've ever had as a First Lady. Okay. First of all, all of the -- all of the different gates that they went through. Russiagate. White Watergate. Pizzagate. Picklegate. Troopergate. Filegate. Emailgate. Chinagate. Pardongate. Hairgate. Benghazigate. Monicagate. And Travelgate. Okay. So she's got a few scandals.

PAT: Yeah. But a lot of that was Bill. A lot of that was Bill.

GLENN: Uh-huh. Okay. Let's go here. Let's look her -- let's look at a little bit of her past. A 27-year-old staff attorney from the House Judiciary Committee. She worked under Jerry Seisman, HEP chief council of the House Judiciary Committee. This is during the Nixon impeachment. He didn't really like her. Now, he didn't fire her. But he said since. I would have fired her if I had the power. Because, quote, she was a liar. She was unethical. She was a dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee, and the rules of confidentiality. Okay.

PAT: No argument from me. Yes, I believe that.

GLENN: All right. Throw in a -- go ahead. Throw in and make me feel better. Throw in a Jill Biden fact. Because she's so horrible.

PAT: Come on. She's guilty of elder abuse. Husband abuse. She's pushing this guy forward on the United States of America, who she knows is an incompetent fool, who is losing his mind. And she doesn't care, because she wants to be near the -- the throne of power. I mean, she is one of the most hideous people I think we've ever seen, in or around the office of the presidency. The Jake Tapper interview -- remember when he -- when he said --

GLENN: I don't know. Hang on. Hang on just a second. I would like to get another opinion. Because I brought a witness in. Let's just ask Vince Foster. Oh, no, he's not. Well, Seth Rich. Come on up. Oh, no, he can't. What were you saying?

PAT: All right. So you are digging into the death list. So that's good news.

GLENN: No. You can -- you can just treat those as a joke. Just treat those as a joke. I got a lot.

PAT: Remember the Jake Tapper interview, when Tapper was trying to ask her about the gaffes, about the problems from Joe Biden. How they were piling up. They were getting much more serious than they used to be, and she just simply said, daddy be HEP. Daddy be, Jake. And immediately shuts him down. It -- it just shows, that she is fully aware. I mean, she's aware like anybody else is aware. Of the problems that that man is having. And she continues to push him forward, on to the -- this public stage, that he's not prepared for. That he's not fit to do. And -- and just setting us up, for one of the worst disasters in American history.

GLENN: Okay. All right. Vast right-wing conspiracy.

PAT: All right.

GLENN: She got together with George Soros and David Brock. And founded Media Matters.

PAT: Oh, yeah.

GLENN: John Podesta, who worked for her. He was a spawn of Hillary. Provided office space for Media Matters. As they started Center for American Progress, also connected to Hillary and George Soros. Then let's see, oh, I love this. She approved a purchase agreement for a Russian-owned company, that was seeking to purchase Canadian uranium mining company with mineral rights in the United States. It was later revealed that the Clinton Foundation had received 2.35 million dollars' worth of donations, linked to the Russian company. That it didn't disclose. The Canadian company involved, was founded by a Clinton Foundation board member. And 100 million-dollar donor. That because she had so many good friends, that cared so much about charity, she negotiated the transfer of 20 percent of all uranium, from the United States, to Russia. She was also on the committee of foreign investment, in the United States. When it unanimously approved the uranium one deal. By the way, the Hill said they had substantial evidence that Russia nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering, to expand Russia's nuclear footprint in the US, as early as 2009. While we're here on the Clinton Foundation, we should remember that the foreign investors, in that one deal, donated $145 million to the Clinton Foundation. Bill Clinton received half a million dollars for a speech in Moscow, from the investment bank, that was in -- in that deal. And, by the way, she was also put in charge of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for Haiti's recovery and reconstruction. And if you remember, her and Bill Clinton were just working so hard in Haiti, that they got less than 9 percent of all of the foreign cash to actually -- to the Haitianians and the government. So that's a pretty good -- did I mention --

PAT: Did I mention. Did I mention the Jill Biden Hispandering.

VOICE: So say it with me. (foreign language). The future is ours! Thank you.

PAT: Okay. Tell me that doesn't trump everything that you just said.

GLENN: No. If I had -- if I would have thought of it, I would have had the audio of Hillary saying, and I'm sick and tired of -- that disagree with this administration! You remember that?

VOICE: I'm tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. And we should stand up and say, we are America! That we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration!

PAT: Listen to how soothing that is. Listen to that soothing voice.

GLENN: I would rather hear Jill Biden talk about breakfast tacos all day long.

PAT: You're about to. You're about to. There's another example of her Hispandering.

GLENN: Oh, boy.

VOICE: Raul built this organization, with the understanding that the diversity of this community, as distinct as the bodegas of the Bronx.

PAT: The bodegas.

VOICE: As beautiful as the blossoms of Miami. And as unique as the breakfast tacos here in San Antonio.

PAT: Oh. That's charming. What a charming phony she is, isn't she? The worst.

GLENN: Yeah. How about the phrase, we came, we saw, he died. How about that one? How about that one?

PAT: Oh. I remember that.

GLENN: About Gadhafi. Who, by the way, she had secret meetings with the Muslim Brotherhood leadership, and the Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi, they -- they -- she made sure that they had $360 million in funding, to help Egyptian businesses. Wink, wink. Nod, nod. When Benghazi happened, you don't remember, four Americans died. Two Navy SEALs. Two diplomats. And she -- you know, she had nothing to do with it, of course. She said, of course, it was because of the stupid film that came out. Which had nothing to do with it. It happened on September 11th. And then after that, she doubled down, on the Arab spring. She said, it was a strategic necessity. And pretty much, paved the road for ISIS. But, I mean -- but, I mean, Jill Biden does --

PAT: Yeah. She does. She -- she -- she descends below all of that. Remember the dandelion incident? Do you remember, she's walking along the field toward the Marine One? She's walking with Joe Biden in the field. Joe bends over and sweetly and romantically picks a gone to seed dandelion. Not even one that was blossomed and yellow. It had gone to seed already. And hands it to his loved one, Jill. Jill takes a few steps. Gets behind the marine, who is standing there, to salute the first couple. And throws it on the ground.
(laughter)
Showing that it's meaningless to her. That romantic --

GLENN: Meaningless.

PAT: -- gesture, from her feeble, aged husband, was meaningless to her. Pathetic.

GLENN: Uh-huh. Uh-huh. Do I need to remind you that Hillary Clinton was the one behind Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier?

PAT: Yes. You do need to.

GLENN: Just that one beats Jill Biden. Just -- just, just that one thing. By the way, I'm doing my research. And this was so satisfying to see. She was so angry. She was staying at the peninsula hotel in Manhattan. And when she realized she lost, she was so angry, she had to, quote, suppress the anger that touched every nerve in my body. She didn't draft a concession speech. She never did it. And she had to find another way to use the hundreds of thousands of dollars of fireworks, donated by her charitable foundation. So she's got like half a million dollars of fireworks from her charity.

PAT: Jeez.

GLENN: For this. She -- she also had -- and I love this. Oh, I want this documented. I -- I got to see pictures of this. She had a 500,000-dollar special effect glass ceiling, that she was going to break through, when she walked out on stage, when she won. And they were like, we just spent half a million dollars on this breakaway glass ceiling.

PAT: Oh, jeez. You know, I may have -- when I made the claim. I may have been suffering from a bit of rinse bias.

GLENN: Yes.

PAT: It is possible.

GLENN: I think you might. I think you might. I think you might. But I agree with you. She's not the worst First Lady we've ever had. But she is a despicable human being.

PAT: She is. She is despicable.

GLENN: I agree with you. I think this is elderly abuse. Spousal abuse. But that's the way --

PAT: And what it's doing to the nation. She knowingly pushed him forward in this. And you know she was behind him the whole time saying, yeah, you got to do this. You have to do this.

And now we're -- we're stuck with it. We're stuck with it.

GLENN: But I don't think she was the driver of it. I think everybody in the Republican -- or the Democrat Party was pushing him. I mean, he's the perfect -- he's the perfect guy to finish the fundamental transformation of America.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: Because you have all these scandals. You have his son. You have his age. So there's a million ways to turn on him. And say, that guy was crazy. After everything has been done. You know what I mean?

PAT: Yeah. Yeah.

GLENN: Then they can separate. That was Joe Biden. That was not us. Because he just did all of it for them, and they can flush him down the toilet and wipe their hands clean. And I think that's what they're going to do.

PAT: Yeah. Well, they have to. They have to.

GLENN: Maybe it's just me.

PAT: Because he's out of it.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.