RADIOJuly 08, 2022

EXPOSED: Biden is HIDING federal plans to ‘expand voting’

Soon after President Biden entered the White House, he issued an executive order declaring that all 600 federal agencies must ‘come up with a plan to expand voting,’ The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway tells Glenn. She details in her recent article, ‘Yes, Biden Is Hiding His Plan To Rig The 2022 Midterm Elections,’ why this order was ‘alarming’ for many: ‘The executive branch does NOT have authority over our election systems,’ she tells Glenn. And, even more alarming? Those federal agencies had to submit their voting plans to SUSAN RICE. Hemingway tells Glenn the government refuses to release ANY detail concerning those agencies’ plans, seemingly until after the midterms are over. So what can be done? Listen to this clip to find out…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I don't know a single American personally. I don't know a single American that actually is not involved deeply in Washington, DC. That doesn't want free and fair elections. That doesn't want every ballot to be counted. And wants to make sure that there is no monkey business going on. And that we can count on our elections. Every American. I don't care who you voted for, I think, wants that. But I don't think anybody in Washington really wants that. Especially the Democrats. They are already setting up that the election is going to be stolen. You can't trust it. And now the problems with the voting machines. They're doing the same things they always do.

But they're doing something else. Remember, the key to understanding this administration, is the administration. He is an administrator. That's it. All the agencies are being pushed to the limit, to take away as many -- as many rights from you, as possible. And make the system work in a completely different way. Than constitutionally.

Mollie Hemingway has written a great article, came out yesterday. Biden is hiding his plan to rig the 2022 midterm elections. Mollie is joining us now.

Hello, Mollie.

MOLLIE: Hello, it's great to be here with you.

GLENN: Yeah. It's great to have you on. This is -- they're doing this in every agency. And this one, you've tried to look into. And they're hiding everything that they're doing. Can you take us from the beginning, and then show us what they're doing.

MOLLIE: Sure. So in March of 2021, just a few weeks after President Biden took office, he issued an executive order, saying that all 600 federal agencies had to come up with a plan to expand voting.

Now, people were immediately alarmed. Because the Constitution does not give the executive branch authority over our election system. That's reserved for the states. There's a very tiny rule for Congress. And so the executive branch has not been given that authority. And people were also worried, because expanding voting is an inherently political act. You know, mobilizing voters is a political act. And so the bureaucracy should not be involved in it. So people wanted to know. Well, what are these plans going to be?

Everyone had 200 plans to turn in a plan. To soothe Rice, by the way. One of the most political people out there. For approval. And people started asking what the plans were. And they were steadfast in refusing to return those plans ever since then.

GLENN: Okay. So I want to make sure people understand.

That is 600 federal agencies. 600.

Had 200 days to show how they would expand citizen's opportunities, to register to vote. And obtain information about participate in the electoral process. They had until March 7th, 2021.

You can't find anything, about what any of those six agencies have turned in.

MOLLIE: And congressmen have been asking for it. You've had the ranking member of every committee in the House, asking for the information.

You've had them expressing their concerns. Congressional committees. Good government groups. Outside citizens are doing FOIA requests, and they just can't get anything.

And it seems to be that what they're doing is trying to slow walk it, until well after the election. In one case, they said they would respond to the FOIA by May of 2024. And so it is really difficult to get information. Which makes it difficult to even know what's going on. And I just want to be clear. These are inherently political acts. Like choosing who you reach out to. And to mobilize get out the vote operations. That's like what political parties do. And it's particularly dangerous. Because we're talking about federal agencies that hand out benefits. And so people are told, hey, we could really use your voting, Mr. Person, who is getting a benefit. You can see how that would be viewed as improper and unethical compulsion, regarding voting, which is something that is very dangerous, and which we previously had stripped laws against.

GLENN: So tell me about what's happening with the centers for Medicare, Medicaid, with their voter turnout. The Department of Labor. What are they doing?

Department of Education.

JOSH: Right. So each of them are choosing to respond to this executive order in different ways. And we are getting these indications that they're complying with this executive order, even if they're refusing to say what exactly they're doing. That you're seeing these public-facing things, where they'll say, they're turning their health centers into vote -- vote places. You know, they're focusing their efforts that should be focused on job training.

You know, during a labor crisis, on get out the vote operations. At the Department of Education Centers, or the federal work study program, which is part of the Department of Education. Had previously said.

Of course you can't use federal work study money, to engage in electioneering or election activity. And now they're saying, you can use these monies, to help run, get out the vote operations.

And I just think it's important to remember the context here too, is that we just had this election in 2020. Where we had Mark Zuckerberg finance the widespread takeover of government election offices, with partisan, you know, left-leaning activists. And they ran get out the vote operations in the blue areas of swing states. So the context here is really troubling too. Because we just saw in 2020. How this type of operation can have severely partisan repercussions. And why people should be on guard, if they want to trust their elections. And if they want to have confidence in their elections.

GLENN: Mollie, what do we do? We have no press that will do it. The congressmen, not getting responded to. The Justice Department is absolutely corrupt.

What do we do?

MOLLIE: So I do think that raising an outcry over the refusal to find information is key. And there are lawsuits that are ongoing.

Two groups have sued to get the information. These agencies are clearly in violation of federal law. And hopefully we would have enough pressure that those lawsuits can be responded to as soon as possible.

So that the public could know what's going on. And people should not despair. I mean, fighting over election administration is something that has been going on in this country, for centuries. And despair is not an appropriate response. Because, you know, you had even a few decades ago. The Democrat Party has disenfranchised like an entire race of people in the South. And people didn't despair. They just fought to make sure that the voting system was fair.

And so I think the most important thing people can do. Is get involved at the local level. Find out what's going on. And how elections are administered in your state. And make sure they're being done properly. And that there are no shenanigans going on. And you'll not be able to do that, unless you're deeply involved in the process. Start now.

We have widespread, election seasoning. So it's not just election days. Which is frankly when Republicans go vote. It's those two months prior. Or years prior. When they're setting up the system, by which everyone else is voting. Or by which the system is so insecure, that it can be exploited. And you really have to just find out what the rules are in your area. Find out what's going on, and get involved. Do election observation. Research. And everybody should do that. If they care about the republic. Because if we don't have elections we can trust, we don't really have a country. But it's not the end of the world, it just requires people to get involved and pay attention.

GLENN: So, Mollie, it's really interesting to me. Because I look at the things that they do. And I'm like, who has time for this? But you have time if you think that you should be in charge with everything and everybody. That is their full-time job. To figure out ways to control everything.

The conservatives, we have just been asleep at the switch. We're like, no. Everybody thinks like this. No. They don't. No, they don't. There's probably 15 percent of very, very active Americans, that are intent on taking the republic and destroying it.

We just have to -- we just have to wake up and realizing, it's really our fault that this is happening.

Because we've just been expecting somebody else to take care of it for us.

JOSH: So I wrote a book on the 2020 election called Rigged. How the media, big tech, and Democrats seized our election, and I go through all sorts of things, including this Mark Zuckerberg operation. That was a 450 million-dollar operation. It was more than anyone had ever conceived of spending on something to take over the government administration of elections.

But that is what I worry about. The federal government. They spend $450 million in the blink of an eye. They have so much money to throw at this. That it's really worry some. And the Constitution does not authors it. Congress does not authorize it. And yet, they're still doing it. But you're absolutely right, that a lot of people have been asleep and not thinking of election integrity for decades. In my book, I actually told the story about how there was this court order that kept Republicans from doing any Election Day oversight for nearly 40 years. I couldn't believe it. When I first learned about it. In the early '70s, a judge in New Jersey put them under a consent decree, where they couldn't get involved in any litigation, Election Day litigation. And for nearly 40 years, they were kept under this. It took the judge dying, and being replaced by an Obama appointed judge. Who said, this is ridiculous.

Let the Republicans out. It was so sensitive. During the 2016 election. Sean Spicer was on the wrong floor of Trump Tower. And they almost kept them under the consent decree for another few years. Because he was supposed to be on floor four, instead of floor five. That's how sensitive it was. It kept Republicans from focusing on this for a very long time. But they're kind of liberated now. And so they are doing much more to do Election Day oversight, and there are many more resources in play now.

GLENN: Real quick, any thoughts on the Supreme Court and what's coming here again, in just a few minutes?

MOLLIE: Well, I think everyone, there's so many important decisions. And yesterday's decision was a huge victory for the Constitution. And it really does speak to the importance of having solid, originalist judges -- or justices on the court.

Everyone is, of course, anxious for the Dobbs decision. For the abortion-related decision, and a lot of people thought it should have been out earlier, because of these death threats that the justices are facing.

So, hopefully, it will come out this week or next week. But it's been overall, in pretty good term for people who care about the Constitution.

GLENN: Yeah. I think it's been very good. Mollie, thank you for having you on. Thank you very much.

MOLLIE: Thank you very much.

GLENN: Mollie Hemingway.

Has THIS Islamist organization BROKEN state laws for YEARS?!

A new report accuses CAIR Action, the political arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, of breaking state laws with its political activism. Glenn Beck reviews this story...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: So let me go over what is -- what's happening with -- with CAIR.

You know, the Founding Fathers were obsessed over accountability.

Because they knew one thing. You know, they did. They must get suggestions from people on, you know, through tweets. They studied every single system of government.

Every single republic that survived. That didn't survive.

Why didn't it survive?

They studied all forms of government. They were trying to come up with something that could -- could set people free.

And they -- they worked really hard on putting our checks and balances in place, because they knew, once power slips into the shadows. They knew, once power slips into the shadows, once influence becomes unmoored from law, what rises is not a republic.

It's a machine. And that's what you're seeing right now. We're not living in a republic. We're living in a machine.

We -- I think we're staring at one of the largest unregulated political machines operating in the United States ever! Okay.

There have been a couple of groups that are doing sweeping investigations, two watchdog groups. One of them is NCRI and the Intelligent Advocacy Network.

And they have concluded now that the political arm of CAIR, he known as CAIR action, has been operating nationwide with no legal authority, to do the things it has been doing for years now.

They're not allowed to raise money. They've been raising money. Coordinating political campaigns.

Not allowed to do it. Endorsing candidates. Not allowed to do it, they're doing it. Mobilizing voters, shaping policy, functioning as a national advocacy network.

They don't have the legal authority to do any of it. And no one has said anything.

Now, according to the report, CAIR action doesn't just have a paperwork problem.

Investigators found, state by state, that it lacks the license, the registrations. The charitable authorizations, required to legally solicit money.

Excuse me. Or conduct political activity, in any of the 22 states in which it operates. Think of that!

I know how serious this is, because I remember what it took to get the license in each and every state, for Mercury One.

So we could operate. We could raise money. We could do things in those states. It's a lot of work. And if you don't do it, you go to jail. And they find out pretty quickly.

Okay?

22 states, they operate not one, zero legal authorization.

In Washington, DC, the city where CAIR action is incorporated, the department of licensing and consumer protection told investigators, they have no record of CAIR action ever obtaining the basic business license required to solicit funds or to operate.

Imagine how long would you last in business, especially if you were controversial.

How long would you remain in business, if you never had a business license?

You think somebody would figure that out?

In a sooner time than I don't know. A couple of decades!

This report means, that the organization if true, is engaging in unlicensed inner state solicitation.

It has exposed itself to allegations as serious as deceptive solicitation. Wire fraud and false statements to the IRS. These are big things.

And this is not political rhetoric.

Are these phrases written in black and white. In the law.

And by investigators. In California, one of CAIR's most active hubs. The state attorney general has said, the state attorney general of California has said, same pattern here!

The state of California, to say, yep. That's what's happening here.

CAIR action has never registered with California's charitable registry.

Never filed the required CT1 form. And has no authorization whatsoever to request donations. But they've been doing it in California anyway.

Fundraising, selling memberships. Issuing endorsements. Mobilizing voters. All of that has been done by CAIR action. There's no record of any license. Any permission, ever. Going to CAIR. From California. That's according to their attorney general.

Wow!

That's pretty remarkable, huh? How does that happen?

It's not just the coast. It is also happening to the Midwest, the South, the Mountain West. Every state hosting its own CAIR action fundraising page, complete with the donate now and become a member portal, despite no trace of the legal filings required to operate. That's bad!

Now, here's where the stakes rise.

Because CAIR action presents itself openly, as the political arm of CAIR National.

Investigators are now warning that any unauthorized fundraising or political activity.

Could become CAIR's national responsibility as well.

So, in other words, the parent, CAIR itself, might be held responsible.

Meaning, this is want just a rogue subdivision.

This could implicate the entire National Organization of CAIR.

Now, this is happening at the same time it's coming under national scrutiny. It's also Texas.

And I think Florida have designated the group a foreign terrorist organization. Members of Congress are now asking the IRS, the Treasury, the Department of Education to investigate all of its partnerships, all of its financing, all of its influence operations. I mean, I think they're going to be in trouble.

How long have we been saying this?

But every time, I have pointed out anything about CAIR, I have been called an Islamophobe, which shuts everything down. That is a word, developed by people like CAIR, to shut people down, so you'll never look into them.

So what happens next?

First of all, the reports have to hold up.

Regulators now have an obligation. Not a choice. An obligation to act!

State attorneys general in these 22 states, they might pursue fines, injunctions, criminal referrals.

All of them need to take action!

The IRS, needs to take action. Investigate tax exempt fraud. Treasury Department may review foreign influence or money flow violations.

Anything coming from overseas.

Oh, I can't imagine it. They're so buttoned up, right now.

DC regulators may determine whether CAIR actions entire fundraising operation has been unlawful from the beginning.

But here's the deeper question. And it's not bureaucratic. This one is constitutional.

Can the United States tolerate an influence machine, that operates outside of the legal framework, designed to prevent corruption, foreign leverage, and untraceable money?

If I hear one more time, talking about how AIPAC has just got to be investigated. Fine. Investigate.

I'm not against it.

Investigate.

Why aren't you saying anything about CAIR?

It feels like it might be a tool in the hands of a foreign operation.

Why aren't you saying anything about this?

Because here it is! It's not like, hey. I wonder why.

This is it! This is it! This isn't about silencing CAIR. Muslim Americans are -- that are full citizens, they have every right to speak. Every right to vote. Every right to organize. Participate in public life. No question! They can disagree with me, all they want.

But no organization. None! Not mine. Not yours. Not theirs. None. Should operate a nationwide political network, in the shadows and be immune from all of the guardrails that every other group must follow!

That's called a fourth branch of government!

That's how a fourth branch goes.

By the way, CAIR has placed all kinds of people in our Department of Homeland Security. Et cetera, et cetera. This organization has done it!

This is -- you cannot have a fourth branch of government.

They must abide by the laws.

No -- you can't have a branch that nobody elected. Nobody oversees.

Nobody holds accountable.

We talked about this yesterday, on yesterday's podcast. So what needs to happen is total transparency. CAIR action has to release its filings. Its donor structure. Its compliance records, if they exist. Equal enforcement under the law. I don't want them prosecuted in special ways.

Look, if AIPAC is doing the same thing. AIPAC should be prosecuted exactly the same way.
I want it equal. I want constitutional rule.

If conservatives, if Catholics, pro-Israel, environmental, Second Amendment groups, if they have to comply by the state law, so does CAIR action.

And if CAIR action has to do it, so do the Second Amendment groups and environmentalists, and pro-Israel and conservative groups. The law cannot be selective. It can't be!

I don't know how that's controversial in today's world. But somehow or another, they will find a way.

The Feds have to review all of this. If the report is accurate, the IRS and the Treasury have to determine whether false statements or unlicensed interstate solicitations have occurred.

Americans deserve to know what exactly, who is influencing our elections. Who is shaping our policy? Who is raising money in their state?

Especially physical the organization claims political authority, that it doesn't legally possess.

Because history will teach us one unchanging lesson. When a republic stops enforcing its own laws, someone else will always step in to fill that vacuum because power abhors a vacuum!

Unregulated, political power abhors a free people. So while it's about CAIR, it's not about Muslim Americans. It's not about religion.

As always, at least on this program, we try to make it about the rule of law.

One standard for everyone or no standard at all!

And that more than anything, will determine whether or not our institutions remain worthy of the freedom and responsibility that we have entrusted to them.

Glenn Beck WARNS Democrats Will Return with VENGEANCE in 2026 | Glenn TV | Ep 473

America is entering a year of historic upheaval from Charlie Kirk’s assassination and the spiritual shock that followed, to Trump’s tariff revolution, China’s rare-earth war, collapsing energy grids, AI displacement, and the looming fights over Taiwan and Venezuela. Glenn sits down with BlazeTV hosts ‪@deaceshow‬ and ‪@lizwheeler‬ along with his head researcher Jason Buttrill, to break down the biggest stories of 2025. Plus, they each give their most explosive prediction for 2026 that could shape our politics, economy, national security, and civil rights in ways Americans have never experienced before.

Trump Just SHATTERED the “Expert Class” - And the Deep State is in Total Panic

For nearly a century, Washington DC has been ruled by an unelected “expert class” operating as an unconstitutional fourth branch of government — accountable to no one, removable by no president, and shielded from all consequences. Glenn breaks down why Trump’s firing of the Federal Trade Commissioner could finally dismantle the 1935 precedent that empowered technocrats, how Ketanji Brown Jackson exposed the Supreme Court’s embrace of expert rule, and why America cannot survive a government run by people who never face the voters and never pay for their failures.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Okay. So President Donald Trump fired the federal trade commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Federal Trade Commission is an administrative position. I mean, this is under -- the head of the federal trade commission is a cabinet member.

And if the justices uphold Trump's firing of Slaughter, that will overturn a precedent that was horrible, that was set in 1935. Remember, 1935, we're flirting with fascism. You know, everybody thinks. Because they haven't seen the horrors of fascism yet.

Everybody thinks fascism is neat, blah, blah. So what they do is they say that this is an independent person. And the president can't fire them. Because they're, you know, an independent agency.

Well, wait. That would make a fourth branch of government. Our Constitution is really clear.

There is no such thing as a fourth branch of government. Right?

So that's what they're deciding. Now, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson, who is talking about how we really need to listen to the experts. Cut four.

VOICE: Because presidents have accepted that there could be both an understanding of Congress and the presidency. That it is in the best interest of the American people to have certain kinds of issues, handled by experts. Who, and I think you -- in your colloquy, Justice Kagan, have identified the fact that these boards are not only experts, but they're also nonpartisan. So the -- the seats are actually distributed in such a way, that we are presumably eliminating political influence because we're trying to get to science and data and actual facts, related to how these decisions are made.

And so the real risk, I think, of allowing non- -- of allowing these kinds of decisions to be made by the president, of saying, everybody can just be removed when I come in, is that we will get away from those very important policy considerations.

VOICE: We will get away from US policy considerations, and it will create opportunities for all kinds of problems that Congress and prior presidents wanted to avoid, risks that flow inevitably, just given human nature, the realities of the world that we live in.

GLENN: Okay.

Now, remember, what she's saying here is, we have to have experts.

We have to have experts. We have to have experts that don't really answer to anybody. Okay?

They're appointed. And then they're just there. This from a, quote, judicial expert, who cannot define a woman, because she's not a doctor.
She's not a scientist.

She needs an expert to define a woman.
That's how insane her thinking is. Okay?

Now, I would just like to ask the Supreme Court, when you want things run by experts, do you mean things like the State Department, or the counsel of foreign relations, that have gotten us into these endless war wars for 100 years?

Because these are the things that Woodrow Wilson wanted. He wanted the country run by experts.

Okay. So is it like the Council of Foreign Relations, that keep getting us into these endless wars.

Or is it more like the Fed, that directs our fiscal policy, that has driven us into $38 trillion of at the time. We have all powerful banks. That strangely all belong to the fed. And endless bailouts for those banks. Are those the experts that you're talking about?

Or are you talking about the experts that are doctors, that gave the country sterilizations, lobotomies, transgender surgeries. You know, or should we listen to the experts, like the ones that are now speaking in Illinois, to get us death on demand like Canada has, with their MAID assisted suicide, which is now the third largest killer in Canada. MAID, assisted suicide, third largest killer in Canada. Experts are saying, we now need it here, and they're pushing for it in Illinois. Or should we listen to the experts? And I think many of them are the same experts strangely, that brought us COVID. Yeah. That was an expert thing. They were trying to protect us. Because they need to do this for our protection. So direct from the labs in China with the help of the American experts like Fauci. We almost put the world out.

Should we listen to those guys?

Or the experts that brought us masking, and Home Depot is absolutely safe. But Ace Hardware wants to kill grandma. Which are the experts that we want? That we want to make sure that we have in our lives? That they don't answer, or can't be fired by anybody. Because I'm pretty full up on the experts, myself. I don't know.

But you're right. These experts would keep the president in check, and they would keep Congress in check. And you in check!

And the Supreme Court, which would be really great. You know, and you know who else they would keep in check? The people.

So, wow, it seems like we would just be a nation run by experts, and our Constitution would be out the window, because that's a fourth branch!

And if you don't believe me, that, you know, these experts never pay a price. Can you name a single expert?

Give me a name of an expert, that gave us any of the things that I just told you about.

Give me the name. I mean, give me the name of one of them. Give me the name of one of them that went to jail. Give me the name of one expert that has been discredited.

You know, where your name will be mud in this town. Do you know where that came from?

Your name is going to be mud. It's not M-U-D. It's M-U-D-D, that comes from Dr. Samuel Mudd. Okay? He was a docks man. He was an expert. He was that set John Wilkes Booth' broken leg. He made crutches. He let him stay there for a while. He claimed he didn't know him, but he did know him.

In fact, one of the reasons they proved it.

Is because when he pulled the boots off -- when he pulled both of his boots off, right there, in the back, you couldn't have missed it. It said "John Wilkes Booth."

He's like, I have no idea who he was.

Yeah. Well, you knew him in advance. This was a predetermined outpost where he could stay. It's clear you could know him.

The guy was still discredited, we still use his name today. Your name will be mud in this town.

And we think that it's like dirt, mixed with water kind of mud. No, it's M-U-D-D, Dr. Mudd. The expert that was so discredited, went to jail, paid for his part of the assassination of -- of Lincoln.

Give me the name of one of the experts in the last 100 years, that has brought us any of the trials and the tribulations. The things that have almost brought us to our knees. Give me the name of one of them. Can't!

Because once an expert class, they don't answer to anyone. So they never go to jail.

Wow! Doesn't that sound familiar. People never going to jail!

There's a rant that's going around right now, that I did in 2020. And everybody is like, see. He's talking about Pam Bondi.

No, no. I got to play this for you, a little later on in the program. But I want to get to the experts and what the Constitution actually says about that. Because you don't need my opinion. What you need are the actual facts. So you can stand up and say, yeah. I think Ketanji Brown Jackson is an idiot. Okay?

And she's really not an expert on anything. Especially the Constitution. You need the facts, on what the Founders said. Because the Founders would be absolutely against what they did in 1935.

Because that just -- what does it do?

It just sets up a fourth branch of government.

EXPLAINED: Why the Warner-Netflix/Paramount Merger is DANGEROUS for All of Us

The biggest media merger in modern history is unfolding, and Glenn Beck warns it’s the most dangerous consolidation of power America has faced in decades. With six corporations already controlling 90% of the nation’s news and entertainment, a Warner-Netflix or Warner-Paramount megacorporation would create an unstoppable information cartel. Glenn exposes how “too big to fail” thinking is repeating itself, how global elites and “experts” are tightening their grip, and why handing our entire cultural narrative to a handful of companies is a direct threat to freedom. The hour is late — and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: By the way, it's never good when you consolidate power. It's never good.

And what is going on now, with this Netflix Warner Brothers paramount stuff, I don't care if Larry Ellison is a conservative or not.

No one should have that much power.

I did a show, gosh, four years ago. I don't even remember when I did it.

We looked it up. In the 1980s. 19 percent of American media was owned by over 50 companies.

Forty years later, 90 percent of the media is watched and controlled by six companies.

National Amusements, the Red Stone Family controls CBS, CMT, MTV, Nickelodeon, gaming and internet. Simon & Schuster Books. That's all one.

Disney, ABC, ESPN, History Channel, Marvel, Star Wars, video games and print.

TimeWarner controls CNN, Warner Brothers, HBO, Turner, video games, internet, and print media like TIME. Comcast, MSNBC, NBC.

CNBC, Telemundo, the Internet.

New Corp. Fox. National Geographic. Ton of others. Sony, with a ton of movies, music and more. The big six. They're valued at nearly $500 billion.

Now, this is something I put together five years ago. So I don't even know. This is probably not even valid even today.

And now we're talking about Netflix, Warner Brothers. Paramount, into all of these one giant corporation. It's wrong! It's wrong!

We can't keep putting all -- everything into the hands of just a few! It's what's killing us!

We've got to spread this around. We can't -- the government cannot okay mergers like this.

They're big enough he has

What happened -- what happened when the banks went under, or almost went under in '08. What did they say the problem was?

They said the banks are too big to fail.

Too big to fail.

Because they were providing all of the services, everybody needs. All the time. And there's only a handful of them.

So if they fall, then everything falls.

Right?

That was the problem. So what did we do to fix it?

We made them bigger!

We let them merge with other banks, and gobble up other things!

And started taking on the local banks.

And so now, your banks that were too big to fail. Are now even bigger. And their failure would be even worse!

What is wrong with us?

Seriously, we're not this stupid.

We're not this stupid.

I think we're just this comfortable.

We just think the experts have a plan. No. The experts don't have a plan.

Their plan is stupid. Their plan is to make it bigger.

Every time it fails. Make it bigger. Push it up.

Make it more global.

No. Haven't you seen what the entire world is like?

The entire world is over-leveraged. The entire world is on the edge.

The entire world is being redesigned.
So what do we do? We don't allow them to make things bigger! We need to start taking more individual and local control of things. They're making it bigger. Which will make the problem bigger. And make the problem so big, you won't be able to do anything about it, because all the experts. All of the heads. They'll all -- there will be six of them. And they will all be sitting in one room.

And they will all be making the instigations. And with them, making those decisions will be all the heads of all the countries around the world, that you're not going to have a say in any of that. They're already trying to do it with the WEF.

But if -- if the Supreme Court says, no, experts matter. And the president can't fire them. You will not have any control over anything!

We're at this place, where we can back out. We can turn around.

We can do it.

It's not too late. But the hour is growing very late.

I don't know about you, I don't like being this.

Up to the edge, you know what I mean?

I would rather have lots of breathing room, between me and the edge of the cliff.

But we don't have that anymore.

Everything has to be done right.

And we have to pay attention.

And the worst thing we can do is make things bigger.

Dream big, think small.