EXPOSED: Biden is HIDING federal plans to ‘expand voting’

Soon after President Biden entered the White House, he issued an executive order declaring that all 600 federal agencies must ‘come up with a plan to expand voting,’ The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway tells Glenn. She details in her recent article, ‘Yes, Biden Is Hiding His Plan To Rig The 2022 Midterm Elections,’ why this order was ‘alarming’ for many: ‘The executive branch does NOT have authority over our election systems,’ she tells Glenn. And, even more alarming? Those federal agencies had to submit their voting plans to SUSAN RICE. Hemingway tells Glenn the government refuses to release ANY detail concerning those agencies’ plans, seemingly until after the midterms are over. So what can be done? Listen to this clip to find out…


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I don't know a single American personally. I don't know a single American that actually is not involved deeply in Washington, DC. That doesn't want free and fair elections. That doesn't want every ballot to be counted. And wants to make sure that there is no monkey business going on. And that we can count on our elections. Every American. I don't care who you voted for, I think, wants that. But I don't think anybody in Washington really wants that. Especially the Democrats. They are already setting up that the election is going to be stolen. You can't trust it. And now the problems with the voting machines. They're doing the same things they always do.

But they're doing something else. Remember, the key to understanding this administration, is the administration. He is an administrator. That's it. All the agencies are being pushed to the limit, to take away as many -- as many rights from you, as possible. And make the system work in a completely different way. Than constitutionally.

Mollie Hemingway has written a great article, came out yesterday. Biden is hiding his plan to rig the 2022 midterm elections. Mollie is joining us now.

Hello, Mollie.

MOLLIE: Hello, it's great to be here with you.

GLENN: Yeah. It's great to have you on. This is -- they're doing this in every agency. And this one, you've tried to look into. And they're hiding everything that they're doing. Can you take us from the beginning, and then show us what they're doing.

MOLLIE: Sure. So in March of 2021, just a few weeks after President Biden took office, he issued an executive order, saying that all 600 federal agencies had to come up with a plan to expand voting.

Now, people were immediately alarmed. Because the Constitution does not give the executive branch authority over our election system. That's reserved for the states. There's a very tiny rule for Congress. And so the executive branch has not been given that authority. And people were also worried, because expanding voting is an inherently political act. You know, mobilizing voters is a political act. And so the bureaucracy should not be involved in it. So people wanted to know. Well, what are these plans going to be?

Everyone had 200 plans to turn in a plan. To soothe Rice, by the way. One of the most political people out there. For approval. And people started asking what the plans were. And they were steadfast in refusing to return those plans ever since then.

GLENN: Okay. So I want to make sure people understand.

That is 600 federal agencies. 600.

Had 200 days to show how they would expand citizen's opportunities, to register to vote. And obtain information about participate in the electoral process. They had until March 7th, 2021.

You can't find anything, about what any of those six agencies have turned in.

MOLLIE: And congressmen have been asking for it. You've had the ranking member of every committee in the House, asking for the information.

You've had them expressing their concerns. Congressional committees. Good government groups. Outside citizens are doing FOIA requests, and they just can't get anything.

And it seems to be that what they're doing is trying to slow walk it, until well after the election. In one case, they said they would respond to the FOIA by May of 2024. And so it is really difficult to get information. Which makes it difficult to even know what's going on. And I just want to be clear. These are inherently political acts. Like choosing who you reach out to. And to mobilize get out the vote operations. That's like what political parties do. And it's particularly dangerous. Because we're talking about federal agencies that hand out benefits. And so people are told, hey, we could really use your voting, Mr. Person, who is getting a benefit. You can see how that would be viewed as improper and unethical compulsion, regarding voting, which is something that is very dangerous, and which we previously had stripped laws against.

GLENN: So tell me about what's happening with the centers for Medicare, Medicaid, with their voter turnout. The Department of Labor. What are they doing?

Department of Education.

JOSH: Right. So each of them are choosing to respond to this executive order in different ways. And we are getting these indications that they're complying with this executive order, even if they're refusing to say what exactly they're doing. That you're seeing these public-facing things, where they'll say, they're turning their health centers into vote -- vote places. You know, they're focusing their efforts that should be focused on job training.

You know, during a labor crisis, on get out the vote operations. At the Department of Education Centers, or the federal work study program, which is part of the Department of Education. Had previously said.

Of course you can't use federal work study money, to engage in electioneering or election activity. And now they're saying, you can use these monies, to help run, get out the vote operations.

And I just think it's important to remember the context here too, is that we just had this election in 2020. Where we had Mark Zuckerberg finance the widespread takeover of government election offices, with partisan, you know, left-leaning activists. And they ran get out the vote operations in the blue areas of swing states. So the context here is really troubling too. Because we just saw in 2020. How this type of operation can have severely partisan repercussions. And why people should be on guard, if they want to trust their elections. And if they want to have confidence in their elections.

GLENN: Mollie, what do we do? We have no press that will do it. The congressmen, not getting responded to. The Justice Department is absolutely corrupt.

What do we do?

MOLLIE: So I do think that raising an outcry over the refusal to find information is key. And there are lawsuits that are ongoing.

Two groups have sued to get the information. These agencies are clearly in violation of federal law. And hopefully we would have enough pressure that those lawsuits can be responded to as soon as possible.

So that the public could know what's going on. And people should not despair. I mean, fighting over election administration is something that has been going on in this country, for centuries. And despair is not an appropriate response. Because, you know, you had even a few decades ago. The Democrat Party has disenfranchised like an entire race of people in the South. And people didn't despair. They just fought to make sure that the voting system was fair.

And so I think the most important thing people can do. Is get involved at the local level. Find out what's going on. And how elections are administered in your state. And make sure they're being done properly. And that there are no shenanigans going on. And you'll not be able to do that, unless you're deeply involved in the process. Start now.

We have widespread, election seasoning. So it's not just election days. Which is frankly when Republicans go vote. It's those two months prior. Or years prior. When they're setting up the system, by which everyone else is voting. Or by which the system is so insecure, that it can be exploited. And you really have to just find out what the rules are in your area. Find out what's going on, and get involved. Do election observation. Research. And everybody should do that. If they care about the republic. Because if we don't have elections we can trust, we don't really have a country. But it's not the end of the world, it just requires people to get involved and pay attention.

GLENN: So, Mollie, it's really interesting to me. Because I look at the things that they do. And I'm like, who has time for this? But you have time if you think that you should be in charge with everything and everybody. That is their full-time job. To figure out ways to control everything.

The conservatives, we have just been asleep at the switch. We're like, no. Everybody thinks like this. No. They don't. No, they don't. There's probably 15 percent of very, very active Americans, that are intent on taking the republic and destroying it.

We just have to -- we just have to wake up and realizing, it's really our fault that this is happening.

Because we've just been expecting somebody else to take care of it for us.

JOSH: So I wrote a book on the 2020 election called Rigged. How the media, big tech, and Democrats seized our election, and I go through all sorts of things, including this Mark Zuckerberg operation. That was a 450 million-dollar operation. It was more than anyone had ever conceived of spending on something to take over the government administration of elections.

But that is what I worry about. The federal government. They spend $450 million in the blink of an eye. They have so much money to throw at this. That it's really worry some. And the Constitution does not authors it. Congress does not authorize it. And yet, they're still doing it. But you're absolutely right, that a lot of people have been asleep and not thinking of election integrity for decades. In my book, I actually told the story about how there was this court order that kept Republicans from doing any Election Day oversight for nearly 40 years. I couldn't believe it. When I first learned about it. In the early '70s, a judge in New Jersey put them under a consent decree, where they couldn't get involved in any litigation, Election Day litigation. And for nearly 40 years, they were kept under this. It took the judge dying, and being replaced by an Obama appointed judge. Who said, this is ridiculous.

Let the Republicans out. It was so sensitive. During the 2016 election. Sean Spicer was on the wrong floor of Trump Tower. And they almost kept them under the consent decree for another few years. Because he was supposed to be on floor four, instead of floor five. That's how sensitive it was. It kept Republicans from focusing on this for a very long time. But they're kind of liberated now. And so they are doing much more to do Election Day oversight, and there are many more resources in play now.

GLENN: Real quick, any thoughts on the Supreme Court and what's coming here again, in just a few minutes?

MOLLIE: Well, I think everyone, there's so many important decisions. And yesterday's decision was a huge victory for the Constitution. And it really does speak to the importance of having solid, originalist judges -- or justices on the court.

Everyone is, of course, anxious for the Dobbs decision. For the abortion-related decision, and a lot of people thought it should have been out earlier, because of these death threats that the justices are facing.

So, hopefully, it will come out this week or next week. But it's been overall, in pretty good term for people who care about the Constitution.

GLENN: Yeah. I think it's been very good. Mollie, thank you for having you on. Thank you very much.

MOLLIE: Thank you very much.

GLENN: Mollie Hemingway.


Glenn reacts to FBI raid of Trump home: A ‘MASSIVE MOVE'

If you are NOT for the destruction of America, Glenn says, then you better pay attention to our federal government’s HUGE accumulation of power. The FBI raid on Donald Trump’s home in Mar-a-Lago late Monday was a ‘MASSIVE MOVE,’ with implications that stretch far beyond simple dislike for the former president. So what IS the far-left’s endgame? What are they hoping to accomplish, and will they stop at NOTHING to destroy President Trump? In this clip, Glenn reacts to the FBI raid and gives his thoughts on those questions plus more…


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Does anybody have any credibility anymore? If you actually -- if you were actually celebrating, what is happening with Donald Trump, you have no idea how much this changes things. If you are not for the destruction of America, you better pay attention quickly. This is a massive move. And who has credibility on it? Nobody is going to believe Donald Trump. But nobody the left. So you're not going to change any minds there. Do you think the right will believe the New York Times? MSNBC? NBC? CBS? You think we're going to believe the New York Times? The people who have been carrying water for the Biden crimes? The Clinton crimes? And I'm not talking about the stupid death list. I'm talking about a server, and having her own State Department people go into a skiff, which is the top secret room. It's completely sealed off. Going in, getting documents. Cutting off top secret. And then emailing them to her, on her private server. And nothing?

And now you're going to try to convince me. This has nothing to do with January 6th. Okay. What does TV to do with? Well, it's a national archives thing. He has papers that should be in the History Department. Excuse me. What?

He has top secret papers. We have pictures. Coincidentally, they came out yesterday, right around the time of the raid, you know, of him flushing stuff down the toilet. We don't know what it was. But somebody who was nameless, took pictures of his toilets when he was traveling. And, you know, he was smart enough to rip him off, so we don't know what they said. But do -- (cut out).

We had somebody with him with a camera on their phone. And they went in right after him, hey, light a match Mr. President, click. Good thing for us, huh? That's ridiculous!

The bank servers, he's pinging a bank. Untrue. Carter Page is a Russian spy. Untrue. Donald Trump is a Russian spy. Does he look like a Russian spy? Untrue. Collusion with Russia. Untrue. Ukraine, the perfect phone call. Not true. Not true. Wasn't a perfect phone call. Was not impeachable. The pee tape dossier. None of that was true. Here's why they can't have him as president of the United States, okay?

They can't have him as president of the United States, because we are headed towards a completely new, all redesigned, non-capitalist, nonconstitutional great reset. And all of the West is involved in it. And New York Times, don't call me a conspiracy theory, because you just wrote a story about me and people like me trying to stop ESG, which you said didn't exist. So you have no credibility.

This is not just about their hatred for Donald Trump. This is about the elites. Now, I've got to tell you, I don't -- I don't like the Secret Service. And I've said this since Bush was in office. I think there's a problem in the Secret Service. I think it's poorly run. I'm a guy who has paid about a million dollars for my family's security every year for the last 15 years. Oh, Glenn Beck must be rolling in the dough. No, not after the security costs. I would rather have my family safe, than any service in the Secret Service because they rely on money. That's it. They'll solve it with money. We'll just get more guys.

Donald Trump should hire his own security. Donald Trump should hire his own security. Because I'm sorry, whether it's through stupidity, or it's part of the government. I don't know. If you're on the Secret Service detail of Donald Trump, God bless you. I watched you guys at CPAC. I watched you more than I watched anything else. I saw your eyes. I watched you. And there are those on his team, that whether you like him or not, are doing your job. And I thank you for that. But if they can't get this guy by hook or by crook, to go in, and be a part of the new jail system. For political opponents, they will kill him.

They cannot have him be president. Because he is America first. Not only that, you do this to this guy, oh, gee. You've gone after my family, you've gone after me. You lied about me. I have the evidence. All I have to do is bring it out. Because it's all on videotape on some dumb son's phone. Do you really think a new Justice Department, that's not even political, but just clear, that hold nothing back, Hillary Clinton and her Clinton Initiative, do you think the Clinton Initiative, that there's no impropriety going on there? Do you really think that Adam Schiff, who's lied -- there's nothing there? Nothing for Hunter? Nothing for Joe Biden, you know, in China. Nothing. No, there's nothing there. BlackRock, the collusion with the banks. Everything that they're doing now, right now, you don't think that a Justice Department, that is hell-bent on cleaning and settling scores could settle scores pretty damn quickly? I hope we don't get there. Because this has to be about reasoned justice. But look at what they've just caused. What is their endgame? What is the endgame? You make him into a martyr? By throwing him into jail or killing him? You make him a martyr. So you make him stronger. That doesn't make sense. Why would you want that? Well, we just want him out of the -- you think Ron DeSantis isn't going to be the immediate front runner, and that Ron DeSantis would be easier to beat in your book? Are you that stupid? Wait. You take out Donald Trump, and then the heir apparent, Ron DeSantis runs, and for some reason, you think that all the Trump supporters wouldn't go, yeah. Hmm. What is your endgame? The only one that makes sense to me, is stop him at any cost. And lunatics will take to the streets, and then we'll have our evidence that they're more dangerous than anyone could possibly imagine. Please, pray for your country. I would -- I would love -- I don't expect to hear from any. But I would love to hear from a Democrat today. Alan Dershowitz has the balls to come on. Wait 'til you hear what he has to say. Is there a single Democrat within the sound of my voice, single one, that doesn't -- that sees this?

Where are the FBI agents? Where are the freaking FBI agents, who don't see what's coming? Stu, look up the things. Eighty-seven thousand IRS agents, coupled with what they already have. That's about 170. That's almost the size of our National Guard. You feel comfortable with that, Democrats? You don't think there's a possibility -- not this guy, because he's so perfect. He's made your life so good. I mean, everything he's done is sunshine and lollipops. Do you really think that there's no possibility, that someone, even Donald Trump might come in at some point and weaponize the IRS? Is there anybody -- is there a single Democrat, call me, I would love to hear from you. 888-727-BECK. Is there one -- because, look, I voted for the guy, but this is too far. This is too much? Anybody, who says, if you would have done that to Hillary Clinton, I would have gone ape? Fascist. I see what you guys have been worried about -- 888-727-BECK


Snickers apologizes to…CHINA?!

GLENN: Mars Wrigley, the company that produces Snickers issued an apology to China on Friday after suggesting Taiwan is an independent country. Stu, you're a Snickers executive. They come in to you and say, Stu, what's your line?

STU: No. We're not apologizing to China.


‘LOOK OUT’: Signs we’re facing a dangerous, NEW America

Texans better ‘wake up,’ Glenn says. Because the state — and many American conservatives outside of it — are NOT moving fast enough to keep up with our rapidly changing America. Glenn explains why believes a new ‘season’ is on the horizon for our nation, and he describes the one thing President Biden could do to ‘polish us off.’ But, it’s not all bad news. In this clip, Glenn also explains why he’s hopeful for a new class of politicians to enter Washington, D.C…


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I have Ron DeSantis on this week on Thursday, for the podcast.

STU: Hmm. That should be interesting. And I think he's the only out there, running in the right direction at the right speed. I think -- I think Florida is one of the only ones that may survive.

I mean, everybody else.

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Even Texas, which is pretty good, is not nearly moving fast enough.

PAT: It doesn't feel like we're on the same trajectory as Florida right now. It seems like they're protecting their freedoms a lot more passionately than -- than we are in Texas.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: I mean, there's no doubt that Governor Abbott has made some missteps over the last couple of years.

GLENN: He doesn't suck though.

PAT: He doesn't suck. But people are pissed at him.

GLENN: Because they expect Ron DeSantis.

PAT: Yes.

STU: Nothing better for Governor Abbott, than to be potentially running against potential Governor O'Rourke though.

GLENN: Oh, yeah. I know. Seriously, I think Abbott would be a great governor, really in any other state.

STU: Right.

GLENN: But Texas is like, wait a minute. What. Wait.

STU: We don't like to be outdone.

GLENN: We don't like to be outdone. And if he were in any other state, we would count him as one of the best governors in the country. And he is. But if you live in Texas, it doesn't feel that way. And Texans, you better wake up. Because you really do want to go out and vote, otherwise, you get Beto.

PAT: Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: It's interesting with DeSantis in particular. From a political standpoint, he's -- he's always in the middle of the right issues.

GLENN: With the right thing, taking the right stand.

STU: Right. And, usually, like at the right level too. He's not just saying -- you might -- it might be satisfying to conservative talk radio listeners, if you come out and you attack all these listeners. And you do all these things that are really, really hard-core. But he has a way of balancing, talking to his base. By doing things that are legal. That are sensible.

GLENN: That are going through the House and the Senate.

STU: That are going through the House and they Senate.

GLENN: He's passing laws. He's not just doing it executive fiat.

STU: It's not just big symbolic gestures. It's been a pretty interesting approach. I remember when he kind of emerged as one of the top candidates, as potential presidential nominee in in 2024. It was early. It was like early -- you know, early pandemic. He was one of the first governors to sort of open things up. And at least get a lot of attention for it. Even though, Kristi Noem pointed out, never closed down. But he's been able to maintain that. And continue building on it. Where a bunch of other governors from that era, were sort of the darlings of conservatives for a while and faded. He's been able to stay right there.

GLENN: Right. Because he continues. That's what I mean. He's on the right track, at the right speed. He's taking all of it on. It's like, I really appreciate the states that are taking on ESG. But when of them are taking on just the E. Well, that leaves the -- the people of your state at risk. It's the S and the G, as well. That are problems.

And DeSantis is doing these things. At the top of the hour, I'm going to tell you, what he did. Vanity Fair just came out with a hysterical article, about how authoritarian Rick DeSantis is.

STU: Can you imagine how bad Ron must be? If Rick is bad, imagine how Ron will be? You'll never get that name right.

Okay. It's not like you're President Ronald Trump. You have just DeSantis.

GLENN: I know. Just DeSantis. Just DeSantis. So, anyway, this is hysterical. He just put in a civics requirements. And wait until you hear the way Vanity Fair is talking about it.

I mean, 1619 Project will come to mind, several times. But it's crazy, because they are defending incorrect history. Their defense is, Thomas Jefferson was raping their slaves. Oh, if I hear that one more time.

PAT: Oh, jeez.

GLENN: That's not true. It was not true.

In fact, dig up that information we had on Thomas Jefferson a couple of weeks ago. Just so we can -- just so we can remind people at the top of the hour. But, you know, I -- I felt something, oh, probably. Probably about eight months ago. I felt the seasons change. And that was spiritual advice to me. Almost 15 years ago. And somebody said to me. Glenn, I said -- when am I going to know? And they said, watch the trees. When the seasons change, you will know.

And I -- I didn't know if I would know that. And I had a real feeling about eight months ago, seasons are changing. And we're in it deeper now. And getting closer to real problems.

This summer within the last eight or nine weeks, I felt them change again. And I think, I could be wrong. But I think that is this climate bill. I think this is the beginning of an entirely new kind of America. And when it is all implemented, look out.

The only other thing that I think they could do to make things -- to really polish us off. Is emergency orders. And if he goes for emergency orders, and declares a national emergency with the weather, we're going to be -- we're going to be cooked. But I was at CPAC. And I saw some of the candidates, that are coming up. And if we can get these candidates in, they're serious. They're serious candidates. I don't know about the ones around you. But the nation has a few people that are willing to go to Washington. Lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. And save the republic. And save the Constitution. What are you saving it from? People who are trying to destroy the Constitution. Read it.


How the ‘Inflation Reduction Act’ targets FARMERS…and YOU.

The Senate passed a 740 BILLION DOLLAR package over the weekend, with Vice President Kamala Harris giving Democrats the last vote they needed. The bill is called the ‘Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,’ but Glenn explains why it likely will do the EXACT opposite. And not only could it hurt your wallet, but it may hurt your food, too. Glenn details parts of the bill that target American farmers and the farming industry, all in the name of climate change. The ramifications — many of which are already happening in Europe — could be HUGE: ‘This is really, very dangerous.’


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: If we don't collapse the size of this government soon, it will become an oppressor. Yesterday -- or, over the weekend, the Senate passed the 740 billion-dollar climate or health care reconciliation package. Now, just remember, $700 billion was the size of the -- DARPA, Obama.

STU: Yeah. First Obama stimulus package.

GLENN: Stimulus. And we all had a cow, that it was 700 billion dollars. We thought that was outrageous. This is 740 billion, just on climate and, quote, health care.

But is it? Let me give you some -- let me give you some information on this. It passed, the bill includes $370 billion in green energy. Subsidies. Now, do you remember how well the green energy subsidies happened last time, when Obama was in? Aren't we just making money, hand over fist, with all of those great investments, that we had under Obama?

STU: I'm a billionaire, because of my investment in Solyndra. It's worked out so well.

GLENN: Is that because of inflation? Because I think that went out of business. Now, here's the key to this bill: $80 billion -- now, remember, 370. This is the biggest thing ever. This is -- this has got to be done. Because we're all going to do to die in a fiery flood. 370 billion, and 80 billion is for the IRS. Now, I want you to listen to what they say, and you'll read it over and over again. It's the Internal Revenue Service, for enforcement. Now, enforcement. Do we have that many greedy billionaires that just aren't paying their taxes. I would like to know.

Do we have that many billionaires that don't have enough money for really good attorneys, to read the law. That you're going to need 80,000 new IRS agents. That doesn't seem to compute at all, does it?

Now, by the way, they're saying that it's going to reduce inflation. It's not going to reduce inflation. If it does, and this is the honest-to-God truth, it may reduce inflation. Why?

Because it's going to hurt you so badly, that you won't be able to buy things. Remember, too much money chasing too far goods. So if you can't make the goods, you've got to reduce the money chasing it. That means, they've got to slow you down, at the store. And that is exactly what this bill will do. But because the government is going to be spending so much more money, I don't think it's going to reduce inflation at all. In fact, I think it's going to make inflation worse. But your -- your life is going to become much more tough. Now, I want to give you some more perspective on this. First of all, the American people. Just see how out of touch the American people -- the -- Washington is. Compared to the American people.

Just 12 percent of the new economist poll. Twelve percent of people think this will actually reduce inflation. The other time, three times as many, 6 percent. Believe it will actually increase inflation. Twenty-three percent believe they don't think the bill will move inflation either way.

And only 29 percent say, they are unsure. Now, this bill is climate and inflation reduction. You don't believe that it's actually going to reduce inflation. They don't ask if you think if it would actually help the green movement. And protect the earth. But they did ask this: Do you -- do you believe it will lower inflation? Average respondent? 51 percent, no. But do you support the bill?

31 percent said, they strongly or somewhat oppose the bill. The rest agreed with it. So who is confused here? You don't believe in it, but you support it.

Now, I'm not talking about you personally. But I'm talking about the American people. How is that possible?

That is because we still believe, that our government, somehow or another, there's still enough people believe that our government or your personal guy in Congress or in the Senate is doing the right thing.

I don't know how this is working. It -- well, I do. They didn't ask another question, in that poll. Do you actually know what's in it?

I can guarantee you, most people don't know what's in it. But let me give you a couple of things. And let's start with the big one.

The inflation reduction act, will give the IRS $80 billion, in additional funding. So you know, that's a 600 percent increase of their budget. 600 percent.

They will hire as many as 87,000 additional employees for enforcement. The increase would more than double the size of the IRS work. Which currently has 78,661 full-time staffers. So they have 78,000, they're adding an additional 87,000. To give you some perspective, the Pentagon. You know how many people work at the Pentagon? You know a huge building that goes on and on and on. Pentagon. World's largest military. The Pentagon houses 27,000 employees.


We're talking over 160,000 IRS agents. The State Department employs 77,243. The FBI has 35,000 people. The customs and Border Patrol employs 19,536 Border Patrol agents. This will make the IRS bigger than all of those agencies, combined.

Now are you for this act? It's a little too late. But are you now for this act?

This is going to be staggering. And here's where it really will impact you. In the bill, in fact, I want to -- page -- page 529, of the Inflation Reduction Act. It will pay -- pay farmers to not farm. They want -- they want to restore the soil. So the measures will include plowing your soil less. Implementing climate-friendly crop rotation techniques. And planting cover crops, that do not yield any food.

There's 20 billion dollars available, September 30th now. To diminish the climate impact from farms. They are going to start paying farmers, not to farm. And then you'll be fine. They're also going to now, hmm. I would like to say encourage you. But what they're going to do to the farmers is tell them, exactly how they can farm. They're going to tell them now, just like they are over in Europe, where the farmers are going out of business and on the streets, protesting. They are now going to tell them, that they have to adopt more climate friendly provisions. They are going to regulate what you can feed your cow. They're going to -- they're going to also tell you what you can grow. How you grow it. What you can use as fertilizer. And the fertilizer that we're all used to. You know, the one that grows one-third more than the old fertilizer. You're not going to be able to use that. Now, we're entering a global food crisis.

Farmers all around the world are going in on this nonsense. It's not working. All around the world. And we've just implemented it, and we're hiring 87,000 new IRS agents, to make sure you comply.

Well, this doesn't have anything to do with the taxes. Oh, yeah. It does. Because you will be getting subsidies. Oh, yes. It does. Because you'll have an ESG score, if you're a farmer.

This is going to devastate our farms. Have you ever noticed, that whenever communists take over, the first thing they do, is kill usually everybody who disagrees with them.

They take out anybody who is ever successful at something. Look at the difference between GM and Elon Musk. Look at the difference between what he's building, and what all these other guys had been building. But all these other guys had been building. The guy is building a spaceship to Mars. The guy has transformed the automobile. And yet, he's on the outs. They're coming after him. I can guarantee you, some of those 87,000 IRS agents are just going to work on Elon Musk and his companies. So they first come after anybody who is a capitalist. Anybody who disagrees with them. Anyone who can do anything. They get rid of them, if they can't co-opt them. Then they go after the farmers. And then when there's a problem with the farmers, they then kill the farmers. Or take their land away. And say, you're not doing it right. Well, because farmers have farmed for generations. They know the things that they have to do. It's not like farmers don't know to rest their land. Or to change their crops. Of course, they know that.

They're farmers. Now we have eggheads coming in. And it happens every time communists take control. That's why people end up eating the zoo animals, and then their dogs.

This is really very dangerous. Oh, by the way, in Europe, they're already to the next phase. The first phase was saying, the climate has to be controlled. And we have to control it through the farmers. The farmers then start to collapse. The farmers then start to take to the streets. And say, this is insanity. Well, the next phase is because no one knows where their food comes from. Or how to grow it. The next phase is already happening. The anti-farm sentiment is growing now in Europe. You watch. The farmers are going to get a really bad name. And the farmers are going to be blamed for the food shortages. You watch. I guarantee it. It's already happening in Europe. So now people are taking to the streets, and saying, it's these farmers that are at fault. This story, repeats itself, over and over again, until human beings learn the lesson.

The question is, America: Will we learn the lesson this time?

It's amazing, because on some of these things, we're behind. We have the results from Europe. And we're still doing it.