Hey FBI, Enough With the Epstein CIRCUS. Release the REAL Story
RADIO

Hey FBI, Enough With the Epstein CIRCUS. Release the REAL Story

A list of over 170 names mentioned in court documents from a case against Jeffrey Epstein has been released. But did we actually learn anything, or is this just another distraction? Glenn reviews what was in the release, as well as what was not. While names like Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Stephen Hawking, David Copperfield, and even Cameron Diaz were included in the list, we learned NOTHING about whether any of these famous people were actually involved in Epstein's illegal activities. Glenn makes the case that it's time to stop obsessing over names and start demanding that the FBI release the REAL answers. One man — FBI Director Christopher Wray — can make it happen. So, why hasn't he?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Are you into this Jeffrey Epstein thing as much as it seems everybody else is?

STU: I think what I'm supposed to say is yes. But, you know, I don't know, man.

Look, I am very, very interested in what actually happened with Jeffrey Epstein, and many of these names that have been released and many more.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: However...

GLENN: So I'm there with you.

STU: Do you have a forever as well on this?

GLENN: I feel, beyond that, that's how I feel. I want to know. I want to know. But everything I'm hearing now, I also hear this in my head. Hmm.

Huh. That's -- gee. Jeffrey Epstein. Oh, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Stephen Hawking, David Copperfield.

What difference does -- what is this?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: This is a circus. This is a cake they're feeding us at the circus.

STU: Because I didn't get much that was new out of this.

At you? Was there anything that you saw in these names that you were surprised about? Tasted Copperfield was not a surprise, I have to say.

But none of this was a surprise.

We knew -- we knew -- we still don't know to the extent that Bill Clinton was involved in this. I want to know. But like --

GLENN: You're not going to --

STU: It doesn't seem like it. Like this is a bunch of people who were brought up by, you know -- in various -- everything is Cameron Diaz was brought. I don't think Cameron Diaz was involved.

I don't know, but all these names came up. And it strikes me as like, there's other information that is held, not in these lawsuits, but by the government.

GLENN: Wait. What?

STU: That I would actually like to know.

GLENN: Yeah. Well, we'll never see that.

STU: You know, Jeffrey Epstein lands on the tarmac. So he lands in an airport, private airport. Near New York City.

He is brought into custody. And at that moment, they go and raid his condo. The government takes all sorts of evidence. Tape. Documents. God knows what.

GLENN: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

STU: And then investry ep teen kills himself. Or you may have another theory on that.

And we never get any of this stuff.

GLENN: No, you know what, I've been fashioning a noose out of apaper napkins and lace doilies. Yeah. When I need to go.

Those lace doilies. And paper. Thin, thin, you know, single ply toilet paper nooses.

I'll be so dead, so fast.

STU: Yeah. I know. Certainly.

GLENN: Anyway.

STU: But we don't have any of that information. And seeming no path to get it. At any point.

GLENN: Hmm. Hmm.

STU: Every little bit of evidence in this particular case is positive.

GLENN: But did you hear about Stephen Hawking in he was involved.

STU: But is that -- what am I supposed to do with that information?

What foyer did a what was at his condo?

What was there? Why don't we learn -- why don't we have that information by now?

GLENN: What are you talking about? Didn't you hear the guy who owns the Hyatt, the chain, you know, Brisker? He was possibly doing some -- we don't have any evidence of it. But he was named.

STU: And all these people have plausible deniability. Right? Because, look, in reality, this is real world. Jeffrey Epstein hung out with basically every power player that you know. Now, that doesn't mean that they were all hooking up with 12-year-olds. It doesn't. Many of them probably were.

GLENN: It could, America. It could. You should think that, but we should argue about that. We should say, well, Donald Trump. Well, Bill Clinton. Donald Trump. Bill Clinton. Donald Trump. Bill Clinton.

It's a cake and circus fest.

STU: Yeah. And I got to say too, there's a huge line here. But the Donald Trump part of this is particularly egregious. He was hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein. It's true. They were at parties. Donald Trump is on the record talking about how much Jeffrey Epstein likes younger women. They were at parties together. They weren't close friends. But they ran in powerful circles.

They were very rich people in powerful circles.

All of this long before any of the accusations of Epstein were public. You're hanging out with a person let's say, 12 years he was accused of a crime. There's no reason for you to be mentioned in the same sentence.

GLENN: No. And -- and before he was charged with a crime, Donald Trump kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago.

STU: Yeah. He didn't like him.

GLENN: No. And said, it was because he made some sexual advance on an underage girl. Banned him from the club. Divorced him as a friend.

STU: Long before.

GLENN: Before any of this came out.

STU: So it's really egregious to try to tie him into this thing. Now, Clinton was a much more -- he was on the plane a bunch of times.

GLENN: Maxwell is on the record saying, Bill Clinton likes them young.

STU: Gates met with -- Bill Gates met with Epstein after all of this stuff went down.

After he was already accused. And all that stuff went down. Where people knew, what Epstein was involved in. And he still was meeting with him.

That's weird.

GLENN: And his divorce with his wife is rumored to be about that. Before this became a big story, it was rumored that she was -- she had had it, with his relationship with Epstein. And she's like, you can't.

That was one of the things that was brought up in the divorce apparently.

STU: Again, all this stuff is just allegations. Is there more evidence to support anything nefarious here?

You've seen the interview with Bill Gates on this probably. But it's like, he's really uncomfortable. And it's weird.

But, you know, Gates is kind of a weird guy. Maybe that's -- maybe it doesn't mean anything. Who knows?

But we're just going down this road of, well, let's talk about Donald Trump.

Because you're mentioning Bill Clinton. We'll bring up Donald Trump.

It's just stupid.

It is the circus that you're talking about.

GLENN: So here's the thing that you should pay attention to. When anybody is talking about this today, you should say, you know, the FBI director has the black book.

All all of the evidence. Most likely, has all of the tapes, because they -- they took everything out of Jeffrey Epstein's house.

And it is now under the purview of the FBI, the director of the FBI.

Do you think that's too much power for one man to have?

To have all of that information. Do you think it was most likely done as an Intel operation.

Most likely, Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence officer. Don't know for what country. Probably ours.

That's why no hands on. Nobody is going to say anything about him. He could get away, almost with murder.

So he was blackmailing people, or using that for other countries or our country, to blackmail people. Should one man in a -- in our government have access to that?

And because it is revolving around the rich, the powerful, the politically connected. Shouldn't we all have access to that?

Because if it was just a truck driver union, we would know all the names. We would know every single name. We would know exactly what they've done.

And they would be in jail if they had done something. So why is it the FBI is sitting on this?

To protect their own. Okay. Even if you say that that is okay. Which I don't.

Hang on just a second. Should one person, is that one person going to be able to use any of this, because that one person could say, you know what, we're going to release this on you.

This is so incredibly dangerous. It is exactly the kind of stuff that Stalin would have loved.

It's exactly the reason why, everybody hates Jay Edgar Hoover. And thought sway Edgar Hoover was a nightmare.

This one cash of information has probably more damaging things than Hoover had collected over 50 years.

I don't know.

I think we should stop talking about who is on this list. Where it gives us really nothing.

And start talking about what -- why is the FBI not releasing everything?

Remember, this is the same FBI, that had the laptop of Hunter Biden for two years.

Before you had even heard of it.

They helped that. They, quote, investigated that. Yeah. Yeah. And what -- what happened there?

Were any favors done for anybody? What happened there, exactly?

STU: If you think about that, we had that hypothetical conversation. What would have happened to the Hunter Biden laptop. If there wasn't a copy left at this computer store, right?

Let's just say, they got into the FBI's hands. And they -- the guy at the Apple store didn't keep a copy.

Right? He just gave it to the FBI. What would have happened? We never would have known that information, right?

And we know, that this Epstein thing is the story. That's what would have happened to it. There would have been a rumor about what was in there. And we would have never known --

GLENN: No. No. No. Can we the barbecue to the ABC anchor, that was doing I think Saturday morning. Good Morning America or something.

And they brought up Epstein in a break. Their mics were opened. They taped it. Listen.

VOICE: I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the air. First of all, I was told, who is Jeffrey Epstein? Nobody knows who this is. This is a student story.

Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew, and threatened us a million different ways.

We were so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview Kate and Will, that we -- that also quashed the story.

And then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated.

She told me. She had pictures. She had everything. She was hiding in (?) talk to us.

And it was unbelievable what we had -- Clinton. We have everything.

I tried for three years to get it on, to no avail.

And now it's all coming out. And it's like these new Revelations.

And I've freaking had it. (?) because I'm just like, oh, my God.

We -- what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up.

Hey. Yep.

The attorney, three years ago, saying. There will come a day, where we will realize that Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile the world has ever known. Had it all (?)

GLENN: And we still don't have that report.

STU: That is unbelievable. Y why is ABC still suppressing (?) all of this?

Why? Why?

STU: Yeah. I don't know. I will say, you know, on the Alan Dershowitz front. She came out and said, maybe it was Alan Dershowitz years later. Because he sued. And it's important to note that all of his accusations did not seem to prove out.

Certainly, the Dershowitz one fell apart completely by her own word.

GLENN: I absolutely believe it about Bill Clinton. But that'sius because I think I know who Bill Clinton is.

And it sounds like Bill Clinton. However, I wouldn't say, Bill Clinton needs to be rounded up as a pedophile. I wouldn't say that. He needs his day in court.

STU: No. Look, it's unfair in a way.

Again, I kind of agree with your take on what actually happened. But he should have -- we should have the evidence. So that we can figure out whether these things occurred or not.

GLENN: And no one deserves silence. No one.

Because of their position, deserves to have all of this boarded up.

Why? Why?

Okay. He's a former president.

But Cincinnatus. You're a farmer. You if to serve. You come back. You're a farmer.

Why does he get special access?

I can understand, while you're in office. Maybe you don't do things.

Because it's just a distraction of the pregnancy. It's a weapon.

But afterwards?

Ideas he get special protection in.

Did the U.S. Government TELEPORT Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?!
RADIO

Did the U.S. Government TELEPORT Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?!

A decade ago, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared without a trace. Now, some are claiming this was a cover-up — by the U.S. GOVERNMENT! Glenn speaks with one of those people, investigative journalist Ashton Forbes, who claims that he has video evidence of what really happened. The alleged footage, which he claims was leaked from within the government, depicts a plane disappearing into what could be a worm hole created by three rotating orbs. Ashton lays out the science that he believes explains this … but does the government really have this game-changing technology? Glenn lets you decide …

Biden Sent HOW MANY Migrants to THIS Red State?!
RADIO

Biden Sent HOW MANY Migrants to THIS Red State?!

According to a new report, internal DHS data has revealed how the Biden administration has flown hundreds of thousands of “inadmissible” migrants into U.S. cities — and the top 15 cities are eye-opening. The controversial CHNV mass-parole program has used YOUR tax dollars to send migrants who have claimed refugee status all over the country. But the administration has brought the most migrants into the country BY FAR through airports in (of course) the red state of Florida. This is ON TOP of the record-high illegal immigration that we have seen under the Biden administration. So, what’s the goal here?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: New internal DHS data reveals 45 US cities that hundreds of thousands of migrants that have felony into via the Biden administrations, controversial CHMV mass parole program.

It shows that the top 15 cities that migrants were flown into, on your tax dollar. On our airlines. Which you have to take your shoes off.

They have to know. I mean, come on over here.

Yeah. Every third person, we do a rectal exam.

Yeah. And now -- now we're just flying these people. Without knowing, who they really are. Doing it in the middle of the night.

Now, these aren't the people who go across the border.

Are these the ones who the United States government went out to, hey. Is anybody -- refugee. If you're a refugee, I've got free tickets to America.

So the top 15 cities, Miami, Florida, 91,000 people were flown in from January through August 2023.

Eight months. Eight months. Miami, Florida, Florida. 91,000.

Ft. Lauderdale. Which is the same city.

I mean, it's Miami Ft. Lauderdale.

STU: Yeah. I used to live in Ft. Lauderdale.

GLENN: It's part of Miami.

STU: It's a little bit of a drive to Miami. It's like Dallas/Fort Worth.

A couple cities close to each other.

GLENN: So Ft. Lauderdale got 60,000. And then New York City is number 3. They got 14,000. Wait a minute.

Wow! That's quite a spread there.

So, you know, they get 150,000, just in Miami, Ft. Lauderdale. And then 14,000 in New York. Houston --
STU: And think about what Eric Adams has said.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

STU: They're overrunning our communities, we can't do anything. Half the cities on this list are on one state. And New York City can't handle this.

GLENN: Yeah. They have 14,000. Then Houston has 8,000.

Orlando has 16,000. Another Florida.

Los Angeles, three. Tampa, another Florida. 3200. Dallas, Texas, is 2200.

San Francisco, 2,000. Atlanta, 2,000.

Newark, New Jersey.

I mean --

STU: Oh, people love Newark.

GLENN: Honestly, if you're like in some other place.

I don't care if they're torturing you. And they say, you want to come to the United States?

Sure. Where am I headed?

Newark, New Jersey. No, I'm going to hang out. I'm good. I'm good.

Put me back on the rack. It's false alarm. I'm not going anywhere.

STU: How are these decisions made?

GLENN: What do you mean?

STU: Do you know -- if you're someone coming in, you're an illegal immigrant, you're on this parole program.

And you come in. Do they say, hey. Here is your -- they have fliers come visit Orlando out there. Look through them until you pick one. Do they assign a city to you? Is it wherever your relatives are?

GLENN: I don't know. It's taken us forever, to get just this information.

STU: I know. It's true. It could be, that these people are like, look, I don't want to go to Newark. So I will pick Tampa or Orlando or Ft. Lauderdale.

My guess is, do you know anyone who lives there?

Yeah. My brother lives in Miami.

So they're flying them to Miami.

I don't know. Regardless, wouldn't the opposite be obvious, if you were honest here? If you're the Biden administration, you keep telling everyone that people in the south and the red states hate immigrants. They're racists. They're, you know, xenophobes. They don't have any programs for them.

So why would you continue to keep bringing them to Florida and Texas. Why?

Wouldn't you bring them to the cities, that have all these wonderful programs that you've passed. Why not?

GLENN: Well, unless you're trying to make sure that you fly them into a city, like Miami, Ft. Lauderdale. That's usually run by Democrats.

And you can have them vote.

STU: But -- but, again, it's not run currently by tells me.

GLENN: Miami, Ft. Lauderdale.

STU: Republican mayor. Remember, he ran for a short time, ran for president.

GLENN: I don't remember that. It was very short. Very short.

STU: Very short. But unless you have enemies, in red states and you realize that what you're doing is a punishment, right?

The same kind of thing that, you know, Greg Abbott did in Texas. You know what, we will send these people up to you guys. You guys deal with them.

Because we're being honest with them here. This is a strain on our society. And so we shouldn't be responsible for them. Because we want them to be stopped before they come in.

Right? All these other people are saying, we're welcoming. You're welcomed here. You will always be welcomed in New York City. I don't know if that one is expired. But that's what Eric Adams was saying when he was running for election.

GLENN: San Francisco.

STU: San Francisco. All these things. We went through and found all the quotes from these mayors.

All of them, welcomed with open arms, illegal who didn't notice. And invited them to come. And now when they actually show up, they realize what the situation is. You're taking a bunch of people who have no current path to earn enough to -- to house themselves. To feed themselves.

To give themselves basic humanitarian aid.

And then you're going to put that on the state, or local -- local communities.

GLENN: Imagine. Imagine your city. Knowing how large you are. You have an influx of 150,000 people.

Where are those jobs?

Where are the jobs for those people? You don't have a deficit of 150,000, you know, employees.


STU: Where do they work?

GLENN: Where are they working?

Where are they working?

By the way, a recent pew poll found that nearly two-thirds of Americans have little or no confidence that Joe Biden is physically fit to be president.

That's two-thirds. When you're talking about the immigration thing, 80 percent of America, wants them to be sent back home.

Okay?

They're starting to get really.

Quite, quite intense object the immigration thing.

And that's Republicans and Democrats.

Everybody knows that the economy is in flames.

Again, two-thirds have little or no confidence that Joe Biden is even physically fit to be president.

What the hell, how is this so close?

How is this so close?

I just -- it doesn't -- it doesn't make sense.

STU: People are not making judgments based on what's in front of them.

GLENN: No. They're not.

STU: They're these partisan. You know, these partisan lanes you get in. And it's impossible to escape them. I don't know. For 80 percent of people, at this point.

We would like to think it's some rare thing.

But it's pretty much everybody who looks at this. And doesn't seem to be spending any time to make this instigation.

Decision was made for them, years ago, decades ago, and they're going and checking the boxes.

Yes. He has mean tweets. But you had a job. We had a country. I mean, yeah. But I know those mean tweets are really, really horrible.

Biden FAILED to do THIS While Calling Out Violent College Protests
RADIO

Biden FAILED to do THIS While Calling Out Violent College Protests

President Biden spoke quickly to the press about the pro-Palestine protests that have taken over college campuses. But while Biden covered the basics — how Americans have a right to protest, but not protest violently, how antisemitism is bad, and how the rule of law should be upheld — did he go far enough? Glenn and Stu don’t believe so. Biden had an opportunity to make a real impact, but instead, he said enough to save his own skin and satisfy some supporters…and he also threw in a few lines to pander to the violent mobs...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Can we pull one of these?

BIDEN: Must be upheld. We're not an authoritarian nation. Where we silence people and squash dissent. The American people are heard. In fact, peaceful protest is the best tradition of how Americans respond to conflict issues. But -- but neither are we a lawless country. We are a civil society, and order must prevail.

Throughout our history, we have often faced moments like this, because we are a big, diverse, free thinking and freedom-loving nation. In moments like this, there are always those who rush in to score political points. But this isn't a moment for politics. It's a moment for clarity. So let me be clear: Peaceful protests in America, violent protest is not protected. Peaceful protest is.

It's against the law, when violence occurs. Destroying property is not a peaceful protest. It's against the law. Vandalism, trespassing, breaking windows, shutting down campuses, forcing the cancellation of classes and ground school. None of this is a peaceful protest.

Threatening people, intimidating people, instilling fear in people is not peaceful protest. It's against the law.

Dissent is essential to democracy. But dissent must never lead to disorder or to deny the rights of others so students can finish the semester and their college education.

Look, it's a basically a matter of fairness. It's a matter of what is right.

Does the right to protest, but not the right to cause chaos.

People have the right to get an education. The right to get a degree.

The right to walk across the campus safely without fear of being attacked.

Let's be clear about this as well: There should be no place in any campus, no place in America, for anti-Semitism or threats of violence against Jewish students.

There is no place for hate speech, or violence of any kind. Whether it's anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab-Americans or Palestinian Americans. It's simply wrong. There's no place for racism in America. It's all wrong.

It's un-American.

I understand people have strong feelings and deep convictions, and in America, we respect the right and protect the right for them to express that. But it doesn't mean anything goes. It needs to be done without violence, without destruction. Without hate. And within the law.

You know, make no mistake, as president I will always defend free speech, I will always be just as a strong on standing up for freedom of the law. That's my responsibility to you, the American people. My obligation to the Constitution.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

BIDEN: Thank you very much.
GLENN: Okay. So there you go. You have Joe Biden doing --

STU: You want to take questions? He might be taking a question soon.

VOICE: Have the protests forced you to reconsider any of the policies with regards to the region?
BIDEN: No.

GLENN: And he walks away.

VOICE: Mr. President, do you think the National Guard should intervene?

BIDEN: No.

GLENN: He's walking away, and the door is closing behind him.

STU: But he's still answering them. No. No.

GLENN: He's just in a -- no. In the hallway. He's in his bedroom. No.

He looks at his wife, she says no. I know. What's happening.

STU: What did you make of that? It was pretty Milquetoast, boring. Not much.

We were talking about this off the air, that he had an actual opportunity here, if he wanted to win over a good chunk of the country, while risking his far left flank, of kind of having the clichéd Sister Souljah moment, who is really harsh against these people are doing what they're doing.

STU: He did not do that. It may have been what he was trying to do. He's seemingly incapable of giving a speech of any value.

That was a -- that was a -- just a -- hey.

GLENN: I think it's enough to satisfy many supporters. We're also at --

STU: What kind of supporters. Like, what group is he targeting that? Like a liberal, maybe Jewish voter?

GLENN: Yeah. And not really.

I think he's kind of pissed off the Jews when he's like, and no place for anti-Semitism.

Or people wanted to hurt Hamas. And Palestinians. And Muslims. And those who are in the Mickey Mouse Club.

STU: Right.

GLENN: The ones who have been raped by the Disney corporation. Which we're totally fine with.

You know, I -- I don't think he -- he reached out to -- to those supporters. But I think he did enough for maybe the average person who is a Democrat. And wants him tolerance the right thing.

What -- okay.

STU: He said, no violence.

He said protests are okay. But no violence. And such. And there's some group, he connects with that. There was a chance for him to really set this issue. Maybe make it a strength, and not a weakness. And he did not do that there. That was -- he could have made a moment of like, look.

These people on these campuses are -- basically, calling them revolting. Passion. Some sort of anger toward the people who are calling for the genocide of Jews. There's none of that. Well, to make sure people can get to classes. You know, everyone has a right to get a degree. Which, by the way, they don't have a right to.

But all of that being said, it wasn't the worst thing I've ever seen out of his mouth.

At least he didn't have red villain lighting behind him.

GLENN: Well, you know what is great though?

He doesn't need that anymore.

STU: We looked into his character.

It's funny too, he's -- from a dramatic standpoint, you couldn't put Joe Biden in like a dramatic movie. Because he's so bad at these speeches.

Even if he says something evil, you're just like, oh, God. This sucks.

GLENN: I think that we should bring the guillotine back. And we should take all bankers. And we should cut their heads off.

STU: Right. They're so -- there's no emotion.

You go back to the Star Wars, like, you know, this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause speech.

You need to be -- you can't put him in a movie. Everyone would be like, wait. What?

Is he talking about hamburgers? What is he talking?

GLENN: And the rebels are taking our bases, and we must stop for the empire!

STU: Right.

Yeah.

GLENN: And taking -- and we --

STU: Cough three times in the middle of a sentence.

GLENN: My uncle was in a spaceship once. He was flanked by aliens.

STU: And we -- isn't it just -- can we at least agree with this. Democrats, Republicans, everybody across the aisle. This is embarrassing. Can we at least just agree on that point. You can still say his policies are better or whatever. People around him. Making the policies, have a better idea, running the country.

Aren't you just embarrassed by this, day after day after take.

It is utterly depressing. That the country that has led the world out of the lack of Silicon Valleyization has this dolt running it.

It's so pathetic. In every way.

GLENN: So you are -- you're -- you're drawing a lot more out of this speech than I did.

I don't think it was bad. I don't think it was good.

But I don't think -- that's not going to make any impact. One way or another.

STU: I don't know that we disagree. I think he had an opportunity for impact, which he did not take. He could have made it worse. I don't think he did it that. I just think he's such an uninspiring figure. And I'm embarrassed when we're led by somebody like that. When I said led, it's definitely in air quotes there. I don't know the president should be viewed this way. But the way we view the president. He just sucks. It's maybe not even deeper than that.

He just sucks at that. He's not good at thing he does. The job he does, he's incapable of doing.

And that's a little bit frustrating for a world superpower.

GLENN: Yes. Again, now I think you're going too soft.

He doesn't -- he's not just incapable of doing it. The guy is a box of matches, in a fireworks factory.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And he's constantly striking himself.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: What happened?

What happened?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: He's constantly setting everything on firepower.

STU: Yeah. But I don't think -- that speech didn't strike me as, hey. Keep going protesters. It wasn't that.

GLENN: No. Which again, if he was some ideological maniac, maybe he would have gone that way.

Elizabeth Warren would have done that. Elizabeth wash would have been like, burn these things to the ground.

Probably. I think. He didn't quite do that.

He went out there, with the idea of, people are criticizing me for not saying anything.

I have to say something. I can say, hey, free speech is good. Don't break the law everybody.

But step back, and probably at this point, what is it? 10:00 a.m. dinner.

And then the day is over. That's what it felt like. And that's the way it feels like all the time with this guy, even when he's doing things that are viscerally angry about -- I mean, he's overcoming the entire system of government with things like the student loan plan. And he does it the same way.

He looks as boring and terrible and awful and coughing in the million dollars of sentences. That he does every other speech.

And, you know, watching him.

It's funny too.

Because he's obviously been told. Hey, if you can avoid coughing in the middle of a sentence.

Can you do that?

Multiple times, he went to cough.

He catches himself. And his hand stays a foot away from. He brings it up.

He starts to cough.

He realizes, he's not supposed to do it.

He doesn't have to cough. He's doing it as a tick. I don't know what he's doing -- and he also does this little scratch his face thing in the million dollars. Jews shouldn't be so murdered all the time.

GLENN: You're making fun of --

STU: Whatever the hell he was saying. I don't know. I just feel like it's an embarrassment from beginning to end. I'm sorry, you didn't feel that way. I'm sorry you like President Biden and you will vote for him. That's not how I feel. And I have to express it. As he said, free speech is important.

REPUBLICANS Just Passed a HATE SPEECH Bill Under the Guise of “Antisemitism”
RADIO

REPUBLICANS Just Passed a HATE SPEECH Bill Under the Guise of “Antisemitism”

The House of Representatives just passed a bill to combat “antisemitism” with the majority of both parties on board. But there’s one big problem with the bill: It’s not an “antisemitism” bill, Glenn says. It’s a hate speech bill. Glenn explains why, although he’s been accused of defending Jews TOO MUCH, he’s “dead set against” this bill: “The only one who can remove the hate in someone's heart is God. Government can't fix human hearts.” Glenn also explains why constitutionalists must defend the pro-Palestinian protesters’ right to free speech — not violence — no matter how despicable it is.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: The House of Representatives passed a major anti-Semitism bill on Wednesday. Which would crack down on anti-Semitism on college campuses, as protests raged nationwide. So you're now not saying that this is going to be for everybody. This is just through the Department of Education.

Legislation was opposed by 21 Republicans and 70 Democrats. The legislation seeks to make the Department of Education adopt the international Holocaust remembrance alliances. Definition of anti-Semitism, when enforcing the 1964 Civil Rights Act on college campuses. Now, I had to look it up. What is the international Holocaust remembrance alliances definition of anti-Semitism?

Well, they define anti-Semitism as, and I'm quoting. A certain perception of Jews. Which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews.

It also defines it as a heretical and physical manifestation of anti-Semitism, and directed towards your or non-Jewish individuals, and/or their property.

Towards the Jewish community, institutions, and religious facilities.

Examples of anti-Semitism include calling for the harming of the Jewish people, in the name of racial or extremist view of religion. And accusing Jewish people of inventing and/or exaggerating the Holocaust. The combat, anti-Semitism movement hailed the passage as a momentous achievement. And said, works remains to be done to get it through the Senate and President Joe Biden's desk. While we celebrate this milestone. Our work is far from over. We now need to urgently call upon Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to prioritize the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. Okay.

So there are the 20 Republicans in the House, that stood up. Florida representative, Matt Gaetz, opposed the bill. He said, this is a hate speech bill.

Anti-Semitism is wrong. But the legislation is written without regard for the Constitution, common sense, or even common understanding of the meaning of the words. If this bill would pass, the gospel itself would meet the definition of anti-Semitism under the terms of this bill. Democratic lawmakers including hoist minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries has also called for the passage of the bill. The countering anti-terrorism act. Or anti-Semitism act. The bill would combat anti-Semitism through the appointment of a new presidential adviser, that would be charged with implementing the White House's coordinated strategy in dealing with anti-Semitism.

What could possibly go wrong here?

The effort to crush anti-Semitism and hatred in any form, is not a democratic or Republican issue. It's an American issue that must be addressed in a bipartisan manner with a fierce urgency of now! Because after all, gang, say it with me. We've got to do something.

Okay. You know, when I hear people say, the Jews killed Jesus. Or those dirty Jews run the world.

Or those Jews are responsible for everything bad. Or you're just saying things because you have a Zionist master. I think to myself, you're a bloody idiot.

You have no clue, as to what is really happening in the world.

You have no clue. Are there some Jewish people, and top of corporations, or top of whatever?

Yeah. Yeah. There are. Are there very successful Jews that happen to be bankers?

Yeah. But, you know what, there's also very successful bankers that are Catholics and Mormons. And Lutherans, and Methodists. And dare I say it, atheists.

Yeah, but it's the Jews that are the problem.

You're an idiot. You shouldn't run around saying these things. But I kind of actually like it, when you do.

Because I know exactly who you are. Oh. Here's a guy who is so stupid, he can't tie his own shoes. Or he's just a massive racist.

Kids, stay away from him. You shouldn't run around saying, because it's false, it's rude. It's stupid.

All of the above. And we're trying to create a society here. The proper response to this act is to not post memes of long-nosed Jews, wrapping their tentacles around a US flag. It doesn't mean you're right about how the Jews are. Or vindicated for noticing that Zionists are the reason for everything bad, that it's ever happened.

You can say those things. You can say those things. Because our Constitution guarantees it.

You know how I feel about anti-Semitism.

You know how I feel about the Holocaust. And the return of the Holocaust. I've been warning about it.

I've been trying to prepare you for this time. I've prepared my family for this time. Hard choices are going to come soon.

They already are. This one doesn't seem hard. What have I always said?

The Constitution must rule. The Constitution must be our set of principles, that we do not violate. No matter, if it cuts your way or against you.
This -- this act, you would think, that someone like me, that is very supportive of the Jews in Israel, would be all for.

I am dead set against this.

And you should be too. Something can be legally permissible, and morally repulsive at the same time.

Speech needs to be protected. Not the stuff we all agree on. But the stuff we don't agree on.

The only speech that needs protection is the speech that a lot of people, the majority find absolutely abhorrent.

Congress doesn't understand. You cannot legislate hatred away. You can't pass a bill. You know what happens?

All you do is you create speakeasies of hate. They go into the closet. They go into another room, where they can't be heard. And it just becomes a festering pool of hate.

That at some point, will break out.

The only one that can remove hatred from hearts is God. We can do our part.

Does that mean that jerk protesters can prevent Jewish students from entering their classroom. No. That's not speech.

In the public square, and I mean that electronically as well, those who are standing up, and, quite honestly, spreading the lies about the Palestinians in Hamas. And saying, no. They're not.

They're good. They're great. There's not a problem there. As much as it kills me to say it, I stand with them on freedom of speech only.

The people who voted for this bill, I'm sure it was well-intended. But they're misguided by human nature itself.

Governments cannot fix human hearts. They are also -- they should all be sent back to some remedial class on the principles of the Constitution of America.

The importance of freedom of speech. The importance of not rushing in to do something, because it's scary right now.

No!

No. Why is it, this Congress can only pass the things, that seemingly only hurt the strength of America. And on me cut across the Constitution.

You just took away our Fourth Amendment right for warrants.

You just took that away, you're now -- you're now just passed another bill, that is bringing people -- who have escaped Gaza. And are Palestinians. Remember, 97 percent of them, in the latest poll, hate America.

About 70 percent of them, were all for Hamas. In the 80 percentile range of supporting October 7th.

Congress, you just passed a bill, that are bringing those people in. To America!

And settling them here in America. What the hell is wrong with you?

You live in the upside down world, I don't.

I still live in the world where the -- where America is all about protected rights. It's a dark day, when only 20 -- only 20 people in Congress that are Republican will stand up against this bill. It is a dark, dark day!