Is SAVING Ukraine worth CRIPPLING the West's economy?

There’s something that MUST be said: America has a price we’re not willing to pay in return for Ukraine’s freedom. We’re not willing to risk U.S. troops or to start a nuclear war. It doesn’t mean we’re not compassionate, Glenn explains…we’re rationally compassionate. And now there’s another huge, potential consequence at play that NO ONE else is talking about: The end of the West's economy. Glenn explains why we must not destroy America — and, specifically, U.S. energy — in the process of stopping Putin and Russia. So, until our current leaders start opening up our own oil reserves, we might be able to help Ukraine. But we cannot save them.


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

STU: So you went through a lot of the detail, of what you see coming here, in the last segment.

GLENN: Yeah.

STU: But take out the detail for a second. To boil your theory down here. Oil is going to spike to levels that are incredibly damaging to our economy.

GLENN: Uh-huh.

STU: And because of that, we are going to continue to buy Russian oil. Maybe try to buy Iranian oil.

GLENN: We're negotiating with them, right freaking now. The Iranians.

PAT: That's insane.

GLENN: And, by the way, it's not damaging our economy. It is the likely depression that we will go into, and possibly the end of the West. Because of economic catastrophe. That is coming our way.

STU: But other than that.

GLENN: But other than that. So listen, I know everybody is -- I feel the same way. You know me. This audience, at least knows me.

You know. I mean, I see the suffering in Ukraine. And the Ukrainian eyes. I see the decency of those people. I see the willingness to be free. Nobody is standing up for freedom anymore.

We -- we're the last hope of the world!

I don't want those people to suffer, and I don't want Putin to win. You cannot teach him that lesson.

But let's have the real conversation here. The one that no one is having. We have already set a price on helping the Ukrainian people.

Have we not? For instance --

PAT: Yes. We're not willing to spend American lives.

GLENN: Correct. Are you willing to go in -- now, ask yourself this question?

Are you willing to go in with troops, full force for the Ukrainian people?

PAT: No. Nope.

STU: Yeah. We've said no to that. We've even said no to a no-fly zone.

PAT: I don't know that any Americans want to do that. I haven't heard any Americans advocating for that.

GLENN: All right. So we've already established what we are. We're just haggling on price. Okay? That's the truth.

PAT: That is the truth.

GLENN: We are haggling on price. And we say American blood. And, quite honestly, treasure and security. Because of all the risks on that. We've already said no.

PAT: We've just done it too much. As it does.

STU: That's not just American lives. And we don't want to get into a war with Russia. That's not just American lives.

PAT: You're talking Armageddon.

STU: That's Armageddon. That's end of the world type stuff.

GLENN: So, again, if you believe any of that. Or for your own reason. Whatever your reason is. If you're saying, no, I'm not willing to send troops over there. You've had -- you've said, there's a price to that freedom. Okay?

PAT: Right. Yeah.

GLENN: So that makes you not compassionate. If you believe that, that makes you already, in the eyes of some.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: Me too.
Not compassionate. How can you say that, when the suffering is going on?

So that takes that argument off the table. Take that emotional argument off the table. You mean you're not willing to do everything to save these people?

No. Clearly as a country, we're not. Because we won't send our own troops in to help them. Okay?

So enough of the bullcrap of the emotional side. Now, let me ask you. We've already had one price established. You are not willing to send in troops. U.S. troops. Into Ukraine.

That's price number one.

Here's the other option, that we are now going down, without having the conversation.
Are you willing to -- within a year, face a depression, a depression.

And possibly, the complete destruction of the western economy.

Food crisis, like we haven't seen since the Dust Bowl.
Are you willing to pay that price? Possibly, you lose your job. You lose your money.

And your family is struggling for food.

And energy prices, that make it so you cannot really afford any gas. Because it's $8 a gallon. And I'm not talking about California. I'm talking about everywhere.

Are you willing to pay that price? For the people of Ukraine?

I know this sounds horrible. But it has to be said.

Are you willing to go through that?

PAT: No.

STU: Well, we're --

PAT: But what brings that on?

GLENN: Hang on just answer the question here.

PAT: Yeah. No. No.

STU: We -- you know, we are obviously have to prioritize our own people. Right?

GLENN: Correct.

STU: And so we do not have -- we're not part of NATO. They're not part of NATO. They don't have an agreement to defend them. We can help they believe defend themselves. That's what I think their role is here. If there is one.

GLENN: If you're conservative, the answer is very easy for you. Because you believe in the lifeboat theory.

You -- it was horrible. But you had to -- if you were the Titanic, and you were in a lifeboat, now, this isn't the same necessarily, if there were three people in the lifeboat.

But if you were in a lifeboat, and it was -- and it was filled, you can't go back and get more people. No matter -- you're listening.

There are screams. And it is horrible. And everyone will drown. That's why we believe in border security.

We can't help the rest of the world, if we drown. Because everybody is coming here.

STU: Right.

GLENN: Okay. So it sounds like it's not compassionate. But it is rational compassion. Okay?

You can't kill yourself, trying to help somebody else.

STU: And it's not as if we're not doing anything here. We're doing a lot.

GLENN: Okay. Here's what brings this on, Pat.
The world revolves -- the entire -- we learned this in 2008. The world revolves around 100-dollar a barrel oil.

It can handle spikes. It can handle 120.

As long as there's an end to that. You know what I mean?
But the -- the --

PAT: As long as it comes back down to 60. Or 40.

GLENN: Yeah. So the -- so the collapse in '08. The last straw to break the camel's back. And let me ask you this question: Do you think we're stronger today, than we were in 2008?

STU: No.

GLENN: Do you? Okay.

So the straw that broke the camel's back on our economy in 2008, they say -- and I believe, would have tanked the western banks and economic system entirely.
That price, was $140 a barrel.

Sustained for how long? A few weeks? A couple weeks

PAT: Yeah. Not very long.

STU: A couple weeks, yeah.

GLENN: We -- by cutting off oil, right now. And remember, we're all saying, we have to really hit them.

We're already at $120 a barrel. Okay?

Already at $120 a barrel.

And we are currently negotiating with Iran, to supply the world with the 10 percent of oil, the oil needs.

Let me ask you this question: Who is more dangerous to the American homeland. The American people. The American way of life. Vladimir Putin, or Iran?

STU: I think you believe it's Iran.

GLENN: A. Let me rephrase it. A fully financed Aruba.

STU: Over a long period of time, I think you would -- you may turn the tables to Iran. But with 13,000 nuclear weapons, I still think Vladimir Putin is a bigger risk.

GLENN: I agree. I agree. A bigger risk. But he is -- he has not been hell-bent on wiping out the American way of life. We have had him in a cage.

Now, lately -- don't know.

STU: And this is the question. Have you turned over a new leaf?

GLENN: Correct.

PAT: That's what everybody is saying. This is not the Putin of five years ago. You keep hearing that.

GLENN: Okay. So let's say you cut off all their oil.

We collapse.

And maybe Russia collapses.

But we don't take Putin out. It's just a disaster. Nobody has -- nobody has any money.

We've collapsed the banking system. You still have Putin in Russia. And you have a richer ayatollah in Iran. And you have the western world, begging them for oil.

This is not a good scenario.

We haven't made anything better by that, okay?

STU: No.

GLENN: We just have to have the discussion here. Because everybody is pushing for crazy things.
They're pushing for let's do no-fly zone. Are you out of your mind?

That could end in nuclear war.

To save the Iranian people. Are you willing to be in a war where one nuclear missile is launched against the United States?

STU: Oh, God no. Nuclear missiles. No.

GLENN: Yes. No.

GLENN: So are you willing to fight for them, and do a no-fly zone?

If one missile is launched to Poland. No. It doesn't matter. Right?

One missile launched to -- to Russia. In Moscow. No.

The answer is no. We don't want nuclear war.

Let's start looking at the actual consequences. And stop looking at it, like fat Americans, who are like, we control the world. We have all the power. We don't anymore. That has changed. It can change. I will listen now. Now that I'm looking at what's happening, and I've figured out that missing piece, remember I'm like, wait a minute.

Something is wrong.

What's wrong is, it's a trap. You are dealing with Marxist revolutionaries, that are running this country, right now.

They want to collapse it, for their own Marxist reasons.

But you also have The Great Reset, that wants a collapse so they can reset, have it collapse, right into their arms.

You have forces inside the house. Wanting this collapse.

So are we going to go along with it? The only way -- the only thing we should be saying is, open up the oil fields and the gas lines here in America.

PAT: Absolutely.

GLENN: You cannot do these kinds of sanctions, and sheave yourself at the same time. We are empowering -- we are empowering China.

Who is the winner in this?

China. China.

You look at -- who we're empowering in the Middle East.


And why?

Because of some F-ing idea, that we're going to get off all petroleum, to help heal the planet.
There will be nothing left of the American and the western society.
Unless you open up not the strategic reserves. That's the craziest thing I've heard. You're on the brink of World War III. And you want to take our military, strategic oil reserves, and just pass it out, so we can go to the movies.

PAT: So we can have an extra two days.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

PAT: It looks like two days.

STU: I mean, it's not even a good idea, when normal times are going on. But when you're in a situation, where war is already breaking out.

And we have allies, one border away, from where missiles are flying. That's an insane idea.

GLENN: So I want the Ukrainian people to know, I am with you. I am with you.

I would collapse Russia, and Iran. So fast, with oil. If we weren't killing ourself.

But I'm sorry, Ukraine. Until the people in this country stand up and absolutely at the gates of the White House, demand that we open up our own reserves. We cannot help you.

We cannot help you.

STU: What does that mean, you can't help? What do you mean, we're going to do nothing? We're already doing stuff.

GLENN: We're on the road to destruction.

STU: But the issue with help in Ukraine. You're right. Compassion is compassion. And I love compassion.

GLENN: You can't shut down all of Russia's oil. I know. It drives me crazy.

But listen. I was for shutting down Russia's oil.

I had been for it. But now, when I see, the missing piece. Something is wrong. Something is wrong.

Here's what's wrong. It's a trap!

That's what's wrong. We cannot do that. We can supply them with arms. We can supply them with food. We can send over doctors. Whatever they need, we can do that.
But we cannot collapse ourself, and put ourselves in their position.

Ready for God knows who. Iran, or China.

Just to take it all.


This government is not on the right side. And when I say that, I don't mean the Iranian -- Ukrainian people. What I mean, is that they're on the wrong side of the American people.

Until they secure us first, no.



'This is how I spend my vacation': Glenn gives behind-the-scenes look at new radio theme recording

If you have ever wondered where Glenn gets the music for his radio show or assumed he used pre-made stock music or cheap computer software, now you know, it’s the real deal. Glenn's vacation technically started this week, but that couldn't keep him away from his natural habitat—the recording studio—where he spent several hours working on an updated radio theme track with pro composer Sam Cardon and Millennial Choirs & Orchestras (MCO).

Glenn was looking for something that sounded more urgent, and from the preview Glenn shared, it sounds like the creative team nailed it. The epic score sounds like it would easily feel at home in a Lord of the Rings or Star Wars film.

The new theme will be on air at a future date, but if you can’t wait, make sure to watch the video for a sneak peak!


Glenn's message to his son's birth mom: THANK YOU

‘I truly thank God for living in these times,’ Glenn says. ‘Look at the miracles that are happening,’ he adds, just moments after the Supreme Court ruled to overturn Roe v. Wade. No matter how much America changes, it’s still the greatest place on earth…and the Supreme Court victories we’ve witnessed in the last week — by justices who truly value the Constitution — prove it, Glenn explains. But there’s still work to be done. Glenn shares a story about his son’s birth mom — a teenager who decided to give her baby a chance to live — and he gives a message for us all: Now is a time for compassion toward ALL pregnant women, no matter the decisions they make...


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: You know, I -- I just walked outside. I have a barn here on the ranch. And it's where my broadcast studio is. And I just walked out to get some fresh air a few minutes ago. And it's -- this is a day that you will remember where you were. Whatever side you were on, you will remember this day. And I walk outside, and my son and another guy standing by this enormous tractor. And he is hitching it up to a trailer. Because they're moving a bunch of logs from one field to another, because they're building a corral. And I don't have my glasses on. And I'm looking. And I'm like, is that Raphe? And I can't -- I'm not sure. Because he's a man. This is the first summer, where he's up here. And he is a man. And it was an interesting thought to have about my son. Who now, in a couple months. Eighteen years ago. A very brave young teenager decided not to have an abortion. Decided that he had nothing to do with her mistake, or whatever happened.

And I remember we prayed so hard for a baby. And I felt almost from the beginning. That we were supposed to adopt.
And this is really hard for moms. Really hard. Baby not from her body. And I think as guys we don't understand that. Because I don't want anything coming out of my body. And if something comes out of my body, I'm not putting it in swaddling clothes, I'm telling you that. And we both wanted her -- how is this going to work? And there is something about God, that he is my son. And there is no difference between him and any of my other children. None. Zero. Not even a shadow.
Just by chance. If his birth mother happens to be listening or his birth grandparents happen to be listening, thank you. Thank you for giving this young man a chance to live. He is -- well, he's been a pain in the ass. But he's also my greatest joy.
We have to look at the things that we do now. Because there's a lot of -- she was 14, I think. Imagine being a 14-year-old. I remember she called her mom, because she -- she went to school. And she had to tell her mom. But she couldn't look her in the eye and tell her. So she called. Didn't know what her mom would say. And her mom was so great. She immediately said, come home, sweetheart. Come home. And they worked it out together what was going to happen.
People who fight for the right to abort children say, you know, who is going to take care of them? There's lots of us. Lots of us. Millions of us. Millions. Millions of us.
You know, today, Roe vs. Wade was -- it came to an end. Catholics would point out on the -- on the feast of the sacred heart of Jesus. And I doubt that they think that's just a coincidence. Because we know that the heart of Christ, I mean, the only thing he really got smoked at, was children. Being abused. It was clear, he liked children, much more, you know, than us adults. But then, again, I don't blame him. I do too. But we can't just think of the children today that are going to be saved, and then say, that's a good thing.
We have to think of the moms. And, you know, I'm like this with Christians who just really want to get people baptized. They don't really care. It's all about the number. You want to bring somebody closer to God, in baptism, that is a fantastic gift. Not from you. But from God. Fantastic. But no one is going to do that. If you don't actually love them. The people who -- the people who need salvation. They don't think anybody loves them. The women who are pregnant, most, not all. But most, who are pregnant. They feel trapped. They don't know what they're going to do. We have to be there for them. Not just during the time they're pregnant. But if they choose to keep the child. To help them. To support them.
You know, it's so funny. I guess we both give up on, you know, once the baby is aborted. Or the baby is saved. Then society auto both sides kind of just turns away. Planned Parenthood, are they concerned about the mental health? Because they deny it. No, no, no. People are celebrating their abortions. I don't think so. I don't think you can do that. And you may have felt like there was absolutely no way out. But at some point, that's going to -- it will haunt you. What could have been. Think about just the mistakes you will make in your life. And how they bother you. I shouldn't have said that. I mean, there were times in my life, where I said things to my mom, or whatever. I carried those things around for 25 years.
We have to have compassion for -- for all of these women. Now, if you're going to use this for contraception. I don't really -- I don't know how to talk to you. I'll try. But I don't know how I can relate. Because -- but I'm hoping most people aren't like that. I'm hoping that's the anomaly in our society. That just thinks, this is the way to have birth control. And one more thing on birth control.
Why is that still a prescription? I would like to say I'm not a doctor. But technically I am. But I'm not sure why that's still a prescription. Don't we know what that does? I mean, are we pretty sure? Yeah. That's what -- that's what happens. This is all it does. It's a pretty safe drug. Do we not just trust people to use only as directed?
I mean, we -- we trust people. I mean, I see stuff all the time. That says, do not drink. Okay. Well, it's turpentine, so I'm not going to drink it. But thank you for trusting me to know I'm smart enough not to do that. Don't put in eyes. Okay. I'm going to make sure that I don't put that -- you know, that cream in my eyes. Thank you. Good safety tip.
I mean, just making contraception over-the-counter. The pill over-the-counter. Would be helpful. Wouldn't it?
It's a lot better to have them get a pill over-the-counter, like that, than have our daughters or anybody else think about the abortion drug, that the FDA now will make sure that everybody can get. That thing is brutal. That is -- that's brutal.
Anyway, I truly -- as I go on vacation in a minute, I truly thank God for living in these times. It's -- would you live at any other time? I mean, I'm a little selfish. Because I'm a whiner. Absolutely, positively nothing before air-conditioning. Nothing before air-conditioning. I even would say, I want to still live in a time where all my meat comes from a counter on a little plastic, Styrofoam tray. Really, that's about as roughing it, as I want to go. I don't want to go past those two things. Indoor toilets. Yeah. But look at the times we live it in now. The miracles that are happening. The miracles of science. The freedoms that we do have.
I have a guy who is on my staff. He's from Scotland. And once in a while, he gets tired of me hearing, this country is just -- and he's like, come to Scotland. Come to England. He's like, I know it's not what it was. But it's still the greatest place on earth. And it is.
And just the victories, just this week. There's going to be more I think next week. Just the victories in the Supreme Court. And it's not -- it's not because of ideology. It's because the people who are put on the court now, actually respect the Constitution of the United States.
You know, Clarence Thomas and Kagan ruled together, on -- I don't know. Something with Medicare today.
What! I don't think they could agree on a dinner menu. But that's not because Thomas sold out. Or Kagan sold out. I know with Thomas, at least, that's because he believes that's what the Constitution says. And that's what is so great about it.
It doesn't cut your way every time.
You don't always win. You don't always get your way. Today is a great day. Praise God. Praise good we have taken this huge step today.
Lord, see your people. And keep them safe. And keep the people who are actually working in these pro-life clinics. Our judges. Our police. Our cities.
Please, keep them safe.


Riots & White House defiance: What may come AFTER Roe ruling

Many members of the far-left already are calling for a ‘Night of Rage’ after the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, and the White House has been discussing plans to defy the ruling too. In fact, one idea floated by Biden Administration officials, according to the New York Times, includes providing abortions on military bases. So, will America experience another summer of riots? Are YOUR taxpayer dollars at risk? And what does this mean for deep-blue states? Josh Hammer, legal expert and opinion editor for Newsweek, joins Glenn to discuss what may come next...


Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Josh Hammer, he's the opinion editor of Newsweek. He's the host of the Josh Hammer show. He is really quite brilliant. One of the leading minds in the conservative movement, I think. Josh Hammer joins us now.

To tell us, what did you find in this decision?

JOSH: Glenn, great to be back with you, on such a momentous, and really such an emotional day, honestly. So, you know, look, as you said, this dropped recently. Funny enough, I was in the middle of getting a guest lecture from an organization on the advisory board as to when it drops. So I barely had any time to kind of skim through, let alone guess the concerning dissenting opinions. But it looks like this looks very similar, to the draft opinion that was leaked, by the Politico story, a month and a half ago, in early May. And I think those of us who were praying that the five justices from this leaked draft opinion, would have the fortitude to stiffen their spines against this unprecedented assault. Now knows that our prayers were answered, Glenn. That's really my takeaway right now.

This looks a lot like the leaked opinion. Justice Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh have some reconcurring opinions.

But unbelievable. And really just holding aside the constitutional law stuff for a second hear. Just speaking as pro-lifers, on a day like today, I think we really just need to pause. And I tweeted this out earlier. We need to just be grateful for our half century of pro-life activist forbearers. You know, this -- Glenn, this issue could have gone away after 1973. That was a long time ago. 1973. I mean, this issue could have just gone away. We owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to the pro-life moral activist. Political activist. And, of course, yes. Legal activist. Who fought day in and day out, that makes sure this great injustice stayed front and center of our national, political conscience. And in many days, the culmination of a half century of fighting for truth and justice. But in many ways, it's also a new beginning for the pro-life fight as well, interestingly.

STU: How do you mean a new beginning for the fight? I just it's going to turn, I think we're going to see abortion turn even darker in those states that allow it. Is that -- is that what you're meaning by this?

JOSH: Well, look, for a half century now, Roe vs. Wade, and its project any, specifically, the Planned Parenthood versus Casey case of 1992.

They took away from the states obviously. They arrogated authority away from the states, the ability to attempt to nationally codify one view of the morality of abortion.

It happened to be a profoundly immoral view. So these -- the fight now shifts to the states. And the pro-life activists. And all the 50 states. Especially, obviously in red states. Purple states. I mean, admittedly some blue states like New York and California, probably won't be able to touch them there.

But we have to make sure that our side is well positioned in the state Capitols for every red, purplish, probably even light blue state, to make sure we fight for successful, cogent, and morally consistent pro-life legislation. The state of Oklahoma, actually, just north of Texas. Right where you are now, Glenn. They have been leading on this actually. Governor Kevin Stitt signed into law, a fantastic pro-life bill there in Oklahoma. A few weeks ago. Maybe a month ago or so at this point, that basically just bans abortion straightforward from conception. And there are some -- you know, obviously, likable the mother. So forth. But we really need to start thinking about trying to craft legislation now, at the state level. But to your point, I do fear that the blue states will only double down in their radicalism. Unfortunately within that will only lead to an ever greater divide, in our country, that we have today. But obviously, at the end of the day. We're going to save at the end of the day, millions and millions of unborn children. We are going to save human beings who can grow up to cure cancer, who can win Nobel prices.

I mean, this is just a tremendous win for the human species. I don't know how to say it other than that.

GLENN: I will tell you, I saw the stat, that I think it was last year or the year before. 20 percent of all pregnancies ended in abortion. 20 percent.

JOSH: Wow.

GLENN: That is -- that is a shocking number. And we do have our -- our work cut out for us. Because I -- I think that these states are going to double down. But I think, you know -- God doesn't waste anything. You know, there is no waste with God. Even the -- even the worst things that could possibly happen, turn out to be something good. You know what I mean? You're like, holy cow, how did that just happen.

And I think that evil is going to fully come unmasked. I'm telling you, Josh. I don't know how you feel about this. I think this could be the day of America's Kristallnacht. I can see these pro-life centers being burned to the ground today. They're calling for a night of rage around the country. I think evil is going to show itself. And that will scare the American people, hopefully.

JOSH: You know, I've been thinking about this a lot this week, actually. Because I've been bracing for a new kind of George Floyd summer of love, happening this summer. Coming to a city or suburb near you. Unfortunately, myself. Look, I live in Florida. I know, Glenn, you live in Texas. It is in moments like this, where I do think that where you live matters. And who your mayor is. Who your governor is, matters.

Because law and order and rioting and anarchy is not really a federal issue. It is to a limited extent. June 2020, Tom Cotton wrote this op-ed that was pretty controversial at the time.

I happen to agree with it. Where he said, quote, unquote, send in the troops. And there is some federal legislation from the reconstruction era that would justify that.

But most kind of quelling and quashing of anarchy does happen. Constitutionally speaking, at the state and local level. So at a moment like this, where I fear that you're probably not wrong. I take some solace. That Governor DeSantis is my governor. I think Texans should take some solace, that they are represented by -- by a Republican governor. The legislature there as well. So I -- I fear that you are right. I pray obviously, that no one -- it's hard.

I fear that it's something -- that something bad is happening. At the end of the day, of course. It does not mean that justices cannot do what they are supposed to do. So thank God they did that.

GLENN: So, Josh, have you looked into what the White House has been saying? The White House yesterday. In fact, do we have a clip of -- of this?

What the White House said yesterday, about the guns. And then they were turned to the -- the Scott us ruling, for Roe vs. Wade. Do we have that, please?

JOSH: Will the president accept this decision, even if he disagrees with it?

VOICE: I think it's going to come from the Supreme Court. So it's a decision we certainly are going to respond to. I'll leave it at that. Just like any other Supreme Court decision. Just like the one they did today on guns.

GLENN: So the White House won't say that they're going to accept it.

Which I don't think they will. They're talking now about taking doctors and moving them into places like Oklahoma or Texas, where abortions will be outlawed. And putting doctors on our military bases to perform abortions.

I mean, where does this go, when you have a government, that is in defiance of -- of one branch of the government?

JOSH: So there's a lot to unpack here. So we should start from first principles. The idea of judicial supremacy, and this is a peculiar thing, to say on a day like today, where such a pro-life victory has happened in Italy. But if we're going to be consistent here, the idea of judicial supremacy. The idea that the justices, have the sole and exclusive ability to interpret the Constitution for themselves. And no other Constitutional actor, in article one or article two, let alone the state. Has the ability to tentatively interpret it. That is erroneous. In fact, actually it was really Abraham Lincoln actually, who in the Dred Scott case, famously opposed judicial supremacy and flouted the Dred Scott ruling, at least as it pertains to everybody other than Dred Scott himself. I have actually argued, a former legal scholarship, in a law review article actually, that the Laconian view of how each branch of government should interpret the Constitution for itself, is correct.

Having said that. Having said that, there is a thing called prudence. And there is a thing called comedy. And in a moment like today, when it really does look like -- and I agree with you, that we are now bracing for riots through the streets. When the political rhetoric is at DEFCON one. When people are trying to assassinate Supreme Court justices. I think it would be -- at its bare minimum, a profoundly imprudent act. For the Biden administration, to try to undermine this ruling.

Now, what they might do, is they might try to kind of issue some kind of executive orders, or issue some regulations, that might try to kind of undermine it, at the edges here. But at the end of the day, the idea that this returns to the state. There's not really a whole lot they can do about that. Basically, at this point, throughout the country. Kentucky within West Virginia. Kansas. Whatever. If they want to go ahead and ban abortion, what can the Biden administration literally do about that? I mean, short of sending in the National Guard, to protect Planned Parenthood, if the state legislature of Kentucky goes ahead and bans it. There's not a whole lot they can do. And it's very difficult to envision a world, in which the Biden administration literally sends in troops to red states, to protect Planned Parenthood, if that state legislature goes ahead and bans it. So for practically speaking. This is a lot of tough talk and rhetoric. Obviously the campaign here in 2022. There's not really a whole lot that practically speaking, they can do to actually prevent red and purple states from enacting pro-life legislation.

GLENN: I'm glad to -- I'm glad to hear that. I know that they have been working on things. I mean, he has said, you know, there's executive orders, that I can employ. There are things that I can do. He's talked about a national public health emergency. Which I think is just -- is crazy. But I would hope, that the president would come out and say, we strongly disagree with this. And you're right. The court is not the end all. But the court did not end abortion. It just said, the people should decide. I think that's the best kind of court ruling, on any of it. The people should decide what this is. And send it back to the states. Josh, I thank you very much. Appreciate your time. Was there -- there was another ruling, that came out today. Was it important?

JOSH: Oh, no. In comparison to this. A total nothing burger. A 5-4 decision on Medicare reimbursement related. So nothing, honestly.

GLENN: Great. Thank you very much. Appreciate it, Josh. Josh Hammer, opinion editor for Newsweek. And the host of the Josh Hammer show.


Good vs EVIL seen in Dobbs case reactions

GLENN: There are two things trending on twitter right now.

Number one is praise God.

Number two trend is Night of Rage.

Good verses evil.

Build up or tear down.