RADIOMay 04, 2023

New WHISTLEBLOWER claims may MASSIVELY incriminate Joe Biden

At what point will the American people stand up against the Biden family corruption and say, ‘enough is enough’? Or, will they never take a stand, so that our most dishonest D.C. politicians continue to escape their crimes completely, 100 percent consequence-free? Now, new whistleblower claims — if true — could MASSIVELY incriminate Joe Biden even more. In fact, Glenn says, if these claims are true, it could be the biggest presidential scandal in American HISTORY. Glenn details the new claims and explains why they’re SO damning for Joe…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I'm really fascinated to see how all of the corruption stuff around the Bidens, and throughout our government. Works out in the end.

Do the American people actually stand up and say, hey. Enough is enough?

Do they care? Does anything happen, or do they all get away with it? I can't wait for the ending.

STU: Yeah. I was going to say, these are all rhetorical questions. I don't want to be sad enough to answer them. It doesn't seem like --

GLENN: It doesn't seem like -- but I will tell you, there is a point coming, that we either completely are just absorbed into this corrupt system. Or Americans begin to stand up and say, enough is enough.

You know, it was 1854 or '56, where, you know, a senator stood up in the well of the Senate, by himself. And they were talking about slavery. And he said, you people are hypocrites.

You are hypocrites. The two parties then were the Wigs, and the Democrats. And he said, you guys talk a good game. Yeah. We'll work on that one. When you're back home, you're not doing anything.

Neither of you guys, neither party is serious about solving any problems. Meanwhile, the South is sleeping with the whore of slavery. That got him almost beaten to death in the well of the Senate.

Now, you think that's bad?

This is worse! Not only was he almost beaten to death. The guy who beat him to death, was a congressman. He used his cane to do it. Beat him in the head. Sumner was never the same. And no one stopped him.

No one on the Senate floor.

No -- you know, the color guard didn't show up. Nobody showed up, to pull that guy off of him.

Then he was never prosecuted. He was never questioned. He was never arrested.

Ever! Instead, the Democrats came back into session. And they had made chains with his little -- with a little mock cane. On it.

And they wore it outside of their clothes. Basically saying, you want to -- you want some of this?

You bring this up, and we'll do it you to, okay?

That was the end. That day, marked the end of the status quo. It's -- there's going to be an event. Somebody is going to stand up and say, enough. Enough.

I don't know what it is. But it's coming. But it's coming.

Honestly, I was reading the news today. You have to get the email newsletter. Today, it's like, oh, my gosh.

It's just crazy. Get the email newsletter. GlennBeck.com. It's free.

But I'm going through all of that. And I'm looking and reading all the stories. And at some point, this morning, I -- I actually stopped and went, okay. I -- I can get the idea of the normalcy bias. I can get the idea that everybody has been pushed into a corner. But I really don't understand, anybody -- and maybe that there's no honest people. Anyone who is honestly looking at things, I don't know how you don't get -- how bad the situation is.

Because it's everywhere.

We'll get into this later. Epstein. You know, when Epstein died. It was kind of a joke. Oh, it was the Clintons. Kind of a joke.

And we thought, maybe, somebody that was involved in the sex ring, you know, offed him. And there were a lot of powerful people.

I don't believe that anymore.

Well, I didn't really believe it then. I was like, there was a shot. But I don't know. I didn't know.

Now! Oh. I don't believe he was killed by the Clintons. He was killed by government operatives. Everybody -- that guy was a spy. That guy was in the intelligence community.

STU: You may have to boil this case a little bit more in-depth further. Because I believe the official designation was suicide still.

GLENN: Yeah. I'm just telling you. When you look at what's going on, all -- everywhere. Where they are glorifying pedophilia. They don't care about the kids on the border.

It's just evil, running rampant. And I think he was a -- I thought -- I think he was doing, you know, honey pot stuff. And working for the government.

And there's been speculation on that, all the time. But everything seems to connect. Did you see that the Epstein bank -- think it's JPMorgan. We'll get into this later. The judge just ruled, there's enough evidence for this to go to court. The charge is: They knew that Epstein's funds were coming from this kind of stuff. And payoffs were being made.

Now, I don't know if they can prove that in court.

But the judge. They wanted it thrown out. And the judge said, no. There's enough here.

STU: Executives are going to have to testify, right?

Jamie Dimon.

GLENN: Right. Right.

Now, let me go back to the whistle-blower. Whistle-blower stories I love.

The whistle-blower story now, the new one. I would like to hear. It's like a chorus of whistles.

I would like to hear them blow at once.

The whistle-blower is alleging that the FBI and Justice Department are in possession of a document, that describes a criminal scheme, involving then vice president Joe Biden, and a foreign national, relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions.

Is this coming from Grassley's office. Grassley is not a bomb thrower.

Grassley. I mean, he's too old. I don't think he can pick up and lift and throw the bomb.

But he's not a bomb thrower.

Also, it comes from the committee chairperson, James Comer.

These guys, it's not the same, as -- I don't know.

You know, if you took Marjorie Green.

This is not the same as that. These two have credibility. Now, they say, the document includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose.

The document and FBI generated FD1023 form, if there's anybody who knows what that is, that was put in this story, I'll bet for a reason.

Allegedly details an arrangement involving an exchange of money for policy decisions.

They issued a subpoena yesterday, following legally protected disclosures, to Grassley's office.

They wrote, we believe the FBI possesses an unclassified internal document, that includes very serious and detailed allegations, implicating the current President of the United States.

What we don't know, is what, if anything, the FBI has done to verify these claims or investigate further. The FBI's recent history of botching politically charged investigations, demands close congressional oversight.

So what you need to know on this is: This -- this could be a charge, that they had. They investigated.

It went nowhere. Because it was an empty charge. Nothing was really there.

However, the whistle-blower has seen this document, and has led -- or leading people to believe, yeah. They didn't do anything.

They buried this.

With their recent burials that they're doing. Just even on Hunter Biden. Why has that guy not been charged? Why has he not been charged for any crime. Any crime.

And they said, well, we will get him on a couple of tax things.

Tax things. How about drugs? How about drugs?

I mean, even if it's not true. Which it absolutely is. The paperwork is in.

All of the money being laundered going to the family. There's nothing after, what? Four years of knowing all of this stuff? There's nothing?

No action. This, and I think Biden is too smart to do this.

At one point, he had all of his faculties.

I can't imagine, that he was like, oh, you want that policy. Well, let me look at the menu here.

That one is 14.99. Now, you want a policy on climate change.

I can get you into something there for 800 bucks. I can't believe that he was that stupid.

STU: Glenn, they -- they literally left a laptop at a computer repair shop.

GLENN: No. That is his heroin son.

STU: I know. But I had that -- I think I said the same thing on the air, the day that Hunter Biden story came out.

There's no way he's that stupid. He left his laptop at a computer repair shop.

That can't be possibly true. Then guess what, it was.

I don't know. They weren't very good at covering their tracks. Of all the things that Bidens too well. And there's so many of them. This doesn't seem one of them. The idea that they can commit crimes and cover them.

GLENN: Well, they don't have to cover them. They just think they can get away with it. Which, again, leads me back to things like Epstein.

Nobody is investigating these things. Nobody is investigating them.

Do you trust the investigations of the FBI, the Justice Department? Do you trust our NSA, our CIA? Our CIA is spying on us. Our CIA is thinking we are the problem. We are the enemy.

They are doing everything to protect the government, not the people.

If they're involved in anything like with a Jeffrey Epstein, do you think they're going to expose that?

No. No way. No way.

And anybody who helps them. I mean, look at the media. How do you possibly explain the media not reporting that, gee. All of our sources have been lying to us.

All of our sources. You know, national security source.

Source deep in the intelligence community, told us. That's what they've been saying for six years.

All their sources are national intelligent sources. Okay?

It's CIA. NSA. And they have been feeding them incorrect information. Over and over and over again.

And now, we know, that it was intentional. It was planned. You could have said, well, CIA. They're always wrong. No. No.

Now we know, these things were planned, plotted, and executed, and we have the goods on it.

Why is the press still not talking about it?

Because they have been co-opted bay our national security apparatus. They are just an arm of that apparatus. And if you don't think that happens, then you've got to go back and read our own history. This is what the Church Commission found back in the '70s. They had co-opted the media. And we were supposed to have oversight. But the oversight is -- they classified everything now, so even Congress members.

They can't get the documents. How many times did -- did the White House file a subpoena for documents from the Justice Department. Or from CIA.

No. Can't turn it up. Yeah. We can't get those. We can't get those you to.

In the darkness. In the darkness is where all of this corrupt stuff happens.

And there is no one shining the light on it. Thank God for the internet. Thank God for people who have brains, and are thinking, and are still willing to question.

More in just a second. What do you think your mobile phone company is doing with the money that you send them every month? Normally that would be a weird question, because I don't really care what people do with it. That's their choice, if you provided a good service.

However, providing food service means you're not trying to destroy me, my family. And everything I stand for. You know.

Donate money to Planned Parenthood. N. No. No, thank you.

I don't want any of my money. Any.

It's kind of a valid concern now. So you do business with people that don't do things like that with your money.

Patriot Mobile. America's only Christian conservative wireless provider, offers dependable, nationwide coverage on all three major networks, so you get the best possible service in your area. But you aren't simultaneously helping fund woke propaganda, by spending your money with the big mobile companies.

Listen, we've got to stand with the people, who are standing with us. We have to show -- it's not enough to show Bud Light that we're not going to buy your beer. When you have somebody who is working in our favor, and they're on our side, and they have a product that is just as good, if not better. And saves you money, there is no excuse, for not switching. You think it's hassle? It's not going to be. Get the free activation with the offer code Beck. Ask about their coverage guarantee while you're there. PatriotMobile.com/Beck. PatriotMobile.com/Beck.

Or 878PATRIOT. 878PATRIOT.

Ten-second station ID.
(music)
We are not going to -- we are going to treat these whistle-blowers exactly the same way, we treated the other whistle-blowers. If you have the goods, great.

But we're not going to condemn somebody on things that we don't have the goods on.

When it comes to the money in China. You have the goods. It's all there. This one, we have no idea. Nobody has actually seen the document, I think, except for the whistle-blower.

If the goods are there, great. We need to find out about it. We need to know about it, and make a decision there.

This is far more serious. This will be -- if this is true, this is the biggest scandal of an American president, in the history of America.

There is no bigger scandal than a president, or a vice president, taking money from a foreign entity to affect our policies.

Nothing bigger. Nothing bigger.

But let's wait and see, what the whistle-blower actually has. And what the FBI did about it.

Just because he has a document that says these allegations, that still doesn't mean he did it.

STU: Right. There's a lot to find out. But it's an amazing thing. They will be going into full spin mode. Which is what they do. You mentioned, they basically lead the coverage. And this goes back to the -- the most on the record thing we have from that is Rhodes from the Obama administration. Remember this quote? It's still one of the most remarkable quotes that's ever come out.

Talking about the Iran Deal. How they sold the Iran Deal to the American people. All these newspapers -- this is an Obama administration official. All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus. Now they don't. They call us to explain to them, what's happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talked to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That's a sea change. They literally know knowing.

That's an on-the-record quote from an Obama official.

GLENN: It's true.

STU: It's true. This is how they get away with this stuff.

GLENN: This is true. When I first got into national broadcast and we were at CNN. Do you remember, I did a couple of interviews, with big legendary names in the industry. And I would come off the floor and go, that person has no idea what they're even talking about. They don't care. They're not interested.

They have no idea. They have questions that a producer handed. So it was bad then. But now you have people that were trained in college. And they were told, this is what journalism really is. Which it's not.

And they have no experience.

And they're just going in and trusting them.

The Globalist Elites' Dystopian Plan for YOUR Future | Glenn Beck Chalkboard Breakdown

There are competing visions for the future of America which are currently in totally different directions. If the globalist elites have their way, the United States will slide into a mass surveillance technocracy where freedoms are eroded and control is fully centralized. Glenn Beck heads to the chalkboard to break down exactly what their goal is and why we need to hold the line against these ominous forces.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Dark Future: Uncovering the Great Reset’s TERRIFYING Next Phase

Barack & Michelle tried to END divorce rumors. It DIDN'T go well

Former president Barack Obama recently joined his wife Michelle Obama and her brother on their podcast to finally put the divorce rumors to rest … but it didn’t exactly work. Glenn Beck and Pat Gray review the awkward footage, including a kiss that could compete for “most awkward TV kiss in history.”

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Now, let me -- let me take you to some place. I think kind of entertaining.

Michelle Obama has a podcast. Who knew?

She does it with her brother. Who knew? It's -- you know, I mean, it's so -- it's a podcast with two brothers. Right?

And -- and it -- they wanted to address the rumors, that they're getting a divorce. And this thing seems so staged.

I want you to -- listen to this awkward exchange on the podcast.

Cut one please.

VOICE: Wait, you guys like each other.

MICHELLE: Oh, yeah. The rumor mill. It's my husband, y'all! Now, don't start.

OBAMA: It's good to be back. It was touch-and-go for a while.

VOICE: It's so nice to have you both in the same room today.

OBAMA: I know. I know.

MICHELLE: I know, because when we aren't, folks things we're divorced. There hasn't been one moment in our marriage, where I thought about quitting my man.

And we've had some really hard times. We've had a lot of fun times. A lot of adventures. And I have become a better person because of the man I'm married to.

VOICE: Okay. Don't make me cry.

PAT: Aw.

GLENN: I believed her. Now, this is just so hokey.

VOICE: And welcome to IMO.

MICHELLE: Get you all teared up. See, but this is why I can't -- see, you can take the hard stuff, but when I start talking about the sweet stuff, you're like, stop. No, I can't do it.

VOICE: I love it. I'm enjoying it.

MICHELLE: But thank you, honey, for being on our show. Thank you for making the time. We had a great --

VOICE: Of course, I've been listening.

PAT: What? No!

GLENN: They're not doing good. They're not doing good.

Okay. And then there was this at the beginning. And some people say, this was very awkward. Some people say, no. It was very nice.

When he walks in the room, he gives her a hug and a kiss. Watch.

Gives her a little peck on the cheek.

PAT: Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

GLENN: Does that --

PAT: Does that look like they're totally into each other?

GLENN: Well, I give my wife a peck on the cheek, if she walks into a room.

PAT: Do you? If you haven't seen her in months and it seems like they haven't, would you kiss her on the cheek? Probably not.

GLENN: No, that's a little different. That would be a little different. But I wouldn't make our first seeing of each other on television.

PAT: Yeah, right, that's true. That's true.

GLENN: But, you know, in listening to the staff talk about this. And they were like, it was a really uncomfortable -- okay.

Well, maybe.

PAT: I think it was a little uncomfortable.

GLENN: It was a little uncomfortable.

It's still, maybe. Maybe.

But I don't think that rivals -- and I can't decide which is the worst, most uncomfortable kiss.

Let me roll you back into the time machine, to Michael Jackson and Lisa Marie Presley. Do you remember this kiss?
(applauding)

GLENN: He turns away, immediately away from the camera. Because he's like.

PAT: He was about to vomit. Yeah.

GLENN: It was so awkward. When that happened, all of us went, oh, my gosh. He has only kissed little boys. What are we doing? What is happening?

He doesn't like women, what is happening?

And then there's the other one that sticks out in my mind of -- and I'm not sure which is worse. The Lisa Marie or the Tipper in Al Gore.

VOICE: The kiss. The famous exchange during the 2000 democratic convention was to some lovely, to others icky.
(laughter)

GLENN: That's an ABC reporter. To some lovely, others icky.

And it really was. And it was -- I believe his global warming stuff more than that kiss.
(laughter)
And you know where I stand on global warming.

That was the most awkward kiss I think ever on television!

PAT: Yeah. It was pretty bad. Pretty bad.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah.

So when people who are, you know -- these youngsters.

These days. They look at Barack and Michelle. They're like, that was an awkward kiss.

Don't even start with me.

We knew when we were kids, what awkward kisses were like.

PAT: The other awkward thing about that.

She claims, there was not been one moment in their marriage.

Where she's considered reeving him.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: She just said a while ago. A month or a year ago, she hated his guts for ten years. She hated it.

GLENN: Yeah. But that doesn't mean you'll give up.

PAT: I guess not. I guess not. Maybe you enjoy being miserable.

I don't know.

GLENN: No. I have to tell you the truth.

My grandmother when I got a divorce, just busted me up forever. I call her up, and I said, on my first marriage.

Grandma, we're getting a divorce.

And my sweet little 80-year-old grandmother, who never said a bad thing in her life said, excuse me?

And I said, what?

We're getting a divorce.

And she said, how dare you.

I said, what's happening. And she said, I really thought you would be the one that would understand. Out of everybody in this family, I thought you would understand.

And I said, what?

And she said, this just -- this just crushed me when she said it.

Do you think your grandfather and I liked each other all these years? I was like, well, yeah.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: Kind of. And she said, we loved each other. But we didn't always like each other. And there were times that we were so mad at each other.

PAT: Yeah. Yeah. Uh-huh.

STU: But we knew one thing: Marriage lasts until death!

PAT: Did she know your first wife?

GLENN: Okay. All right. That's just not necessary.

No, Trump’s tariffs ARE NOT causing inflation

The media is insisting that President Trump's tariffs caused a rise in inflation for June. But Our Republic president Justin Haskins joins Glenn to debunk this theory and present another for where inflation is really coming from.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Justin Haskins is here. He is the president of Our Republic. And the editor-in-chief of stoppingsocialism.com.

He is also the coauthor with me at the Great Reset, Dark Future, and Propaganda War.

So, in other words, I'm saying, he doesn't have a lot of credibility. But he is here to report -- I don't even think you're -- you're -- you were wrong on this, too, with the tariffs. Right?

JUSTIN: Well, at some point, I was wrong about everything.

GLENN: Yeah, right. We are all on the road to being right.

But this is coming as a shock. You called yesterday, and you said, Glenn, I think the tariff thing -- I think the president might be right.

And this is something I told him, if I'm wrong. I will admit that I'm wrong.

But I don't think I'm wrong.

Because this goes against everything the economists have said, forever.

That tariffs don't work.

They increase inflation.

It's going to cost us more.

All of these things. You have been study this now for a while, to come up with the right answer, no matter where it fell.

Tell me what's going on.

JUSTIN: Okay. So the most recent inflation data that came out from the government, shows that in June, prices went up 2.7 percent. In May, they went up 2.4 percent. That's compared to a year prior. And most people are saying, well, this is proof that the tariffs are causing inflation.

GLENN: Wait. That inflation is -- the target is -- the target is two -- I'm sorry.

We're not. I mean, when I was saying, it was going to cause inflation. I thought we could be up to 5 percent.

But, anyway, go ahead.

JUSTIN: So the really incredible thing though. The more you look at the numbers. The more obvious it is, that this does not prove inflation at all.

For starters, these numbers are lower, than what the numbers were in December and January.

Before Trump was president. And before we had any talk of tariffs at all.

So that is a big red flag right at the very beginning. When you dive even deeper into the numbers, what you see is there's all kinds of parts of the Consumer Price Index that tracks specific industries, or kinds of goods and services. That should be showing inflation, if inflation is being caused by tariffs, but isn't.

So, for example, clothing and apparel. Ninety-seven percent, basically.

About 97 percent according to one report, of clothing and apparel comes overseas, imported into the United States.

GLENN: Correct.

JUSTIN: So prices for apparel and clothing should be going up. And they're not going up, according to the data, they're actually going down, compared to what they were a year ago. Same thing is true with new vehicles.

Obviously, there were huge tariffs put on foreign vehicles, not on domestic vehicles. So it's a little bit more mixed.

But new vehicle price are his staying basically flat. They haven't gone up at all. Even though, there's a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. And then we just look at the overall import prices. You just -- sort of the index. Which the government tracks.

What we're seeing is that prices are basically staying the same, from what they were a year ago.

There's very, very little movement overall.

GLENN: Okay. So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.

Wait.

Let me just -- let me just make something career.

Somebody is eating the tariffs. And it appears to be the companies that are making these things. Which is what Donald Trump said. And then, the -- you know, the economist always saying, well, they're just going to pass this on in the price.

Well, they have to. They have to get this money some place.

So where are they?

Is it possible they're just doing this right now, to get past. Because they know if they jack up their price, you know, they won't be able to sell anything. What is happening?

How is this money, being coughed up by the companies, and not passed on to the consumer.

JUSTIN: Yeah, it could be happening. I think the most likely scenario, is that they are passing it along to consumers. They're just not passing it along to American consumers.

In other words, they're raising prices elsewhere. To try to protect the competitiveness with the American market. Because the American market is the most important consumer market in the world.

And they probably don't want to piss off Donald Trump either, in jacking up prices. And then potentially having tariffs go up even more, as a punishment for doing that.

Because that's a real option.

And so I think that's what's happening right now.

Now, it's possible, that we are going to see a huge increase in inflation. In six months!

That's entirely possible.

We don't know what's going to happen. But as of right now, all the data is suggesting that recent inflation is not coming from consumer goods being imported, or anything like that.

That's not where the inflation is coming.

Instead, it's coming from housing.

That's part of the CPI at that time.

Housing is the cause of inflation right now.

GLENN: Wait. Wait. It's not housing, is it?

Because the things to make houses is not going through the roof. Pardon the pun. Right?

It's not building.

JUSTIN: No. No. The way the CPI calculates housing is really stupid. They look basically primarily at rent. That's the primary way, they determine housing prices.

GLENN: Okay.

JUSTIN: That so on they're not talking about housing costs to build a new house.

Or housing prices to buy a new house.

They are talking about rent.

And then they try to use rent data, as a way of calculating how much you would have to pay if you owned a house, but you had to rent the same kind of house.

And that's how they come up with this category.

GLENN: Can I ask you a question: Is everybody in Washington, are they all retarded?
(laughter)
Because I don't. What the hell. Who is coming up with that formula?

JUSTIN: Look. I mean, sort of underlying this whole conversation, as you -- as you and I know, Glenn.

And Pat too. The CPI is a joke to begin with.

GLENN: Right.

JUSTIN: So there's all kinds of problems with this system, to begin with.

I mean, come on!

GLENN: Okay. So because I promised the president, if I was wrong, and I had the data that I was wrong, I would tell him.

Do I have to -- out of all the days to do this.

Do I have to call him today, to do that?

Are we still -- are we still looking at this, going, well, maybe?

JUSTIN: I think there's -- I think there is a really solid argument that you don't need to make the phone call.

GLENN: Oh, thank God. Today is not the day to call Donald Trump. Today is not the day.

Yeah. All right.

JUSTIN: And the reason why is, we need -- we probably do need more data over a longer period of time, to see if corporations are doing something.

In order to try to push these cuts off into the future, for some reason. Maybe in the hopes that the tariffs go down. Or maybe -- you know, it's all sorts of ways, they could play with it, to try to avoid paying those costs today.

It's possible, that's what's going on.

But as of right now, that's not at all, what is happening. As far as I can tell from the data.

GLENN: But isn't the other side of this, because everybody else said, oh. It's not going to pay for anything.

Didn't we last month have the first surplus since, I don't know. Abraham Lincoln.

JUSTIN: Yes. Yes. We did. I don't know how long that surplus will last us.

GLENN: Yeah. But we had one month.

I don't think I've ever heard that before in my lifetime. Hey, United States had a surplus.

JUSTIN: I looked it up.

I think it was like 20 something years ago, was the last time that happened. If I remembered right.

It was 20 something years ago.

So this is incredible, really.

And if it works.

You and I talked about this before.

I actually think there is an argument to be made. That this whole strategy could work, if American manufacturers can dramatically bring down their costs. To produce goods and services.

So that they can be competitive.

And I think that advancements in artificial intelligence. In automation. Is going to open up the door to that being a reality.

And if you listen to the Trump administration talk. People like Howard Lutnick, Secretary of Commerce. They have said, this is the plan.

The plan is, go all in on artificial intelligence.

Automation. That's going to make us competitive with manufacturers overseas. China is already doing that.

They're already automating their factories. They lead the world in automation.

GLENN: Yeah, but they can take half their population, put them up in a plane, and then crash it into the side of the mountain.

They don't care.

What happens to the people that now don't have a job here? How do they afford the clothes that are now much, much cheaper?

JUSTIN: Well, I think the answer to that is, there's going to be significantly more wealth. Trillions of dollars that we send overseas, every year, now in the American economy. And that's going to go into other things. It's not as though -- when this technology comes along, it is not as though people lose their jobs, and that's it. People sit on their couch forever.

The real danger here is not that new markets will not arrive in that situation. And jobs with it. The problem is: I think there's a real opportunity here. And I think this is going to be the fight of the next election, potentially. Presidential election. And going forward.

Next, ten, 20 years. This is going to be a huge issue. Democrats are going to have the opportunity, when the AI revolution goes into full force. They will have the opportunity like they've never had before.

To say, you know what, we'll take care of you. Don't worry about it.

We're just going to take all of the corporate money and all of the rich people's money.

And we will print trillions of dollars more. And you can sit on your couch forever. And we will just pay you. Because this whole system is rigged, and it's unfair, and you don't have a job anymore because of AI. And there's nothing you can do. You can't compete with AI. AI is smarter than you.

You have no hope.

I think that's coming, and it is going to be really hard for free market people to fight back against that.

GLENN: Yes.

Well, I tend to agree with you.

Because the -- you know, I thought about this.

I war gamed this, probably in 2006.

I'm thinking, okay.

If -- if the tech is going to grow and grow and grow. And they will start being -- they will be responsible for taking the jobs.

They won't be real on popular.

So they will need some people that will allow them to stay in business, and to protect them.

So they're going to need to be in with the politicians.

And if the politicians are overseeing the -- the decrease of jobs, they're going to need the -- the PR arm of things like social media. And what it can be done.

What can be done now.

I was thinking, at the time. Google can do.

But they need each other.

They must have one another. And unless we have a stronger foundation, and a very clear direction, and I will tell you. The president disagrees with me on this.

I said, he's going to be remembered as the transformational AI president.

And he said, I think you're wrong on that.

And I don't think I am.

This -- this -- this time period is going to be remembered for transformation.

And he is transforming the world. But the one that will make the lasting difference will be power and AI.

Agree with that or disagree?

JUSTIN: 1,000 percent. 1,000 percent. This is by far the most important thing that is happening in his administration in the long run. You're projecting out ten, 20, 30 years ago years.

They will be talking about this moment in history, a thousand years from now. Like, that will -- and they will -- and if America becomes the epicenter of this new technology, they will be talking about it, a thousand years from now, about how Americans were the ones that really developed this.

That they're the ones that promoted it, that they're the ones that does took advantage of it.
That's why this AI race with China is so important that we win it.

It's one of the reasons why. And I do think it's a defining moment for his presidency. Of course, the problem with all of this is AI could kill us all. You have to weigh that in.

GLENN: Yeah. Right. Right.

Well, we hope you're wrong on that one.

And I'm wrong on it as well. Justin, thank you so much.

Thank you for giving me the out, where I don't have to call him today. But I might have to call him soon. Thanks, Justin. I appreciate it.

The ONLY Trump/Epstein Files Theories That Make Sense | Glenn TV | Ep 445

Is the case closed on Jeffrey Epstein and Russiagate? Maybe not. Glenn Beck pulls the thread on the story and its far-reaching implications that could expose a web of scandals and lead to a complete implosion of trust. Glenn lays out five theories that could explain Trump’s frustration over the Epstein files and why Glenn may never talk about the Epstein case again. Plus, Glenn connects the dots between the Russiagate hoax, the Hunter Biden laptop cover-up, and the Steele dossier related to the FBI’s new “grand conspiracy” probe. It all leads to one James Bond-like villain: former CIA Director John Brennan. Then, Bryan Dean Wright, former CIA operations officer, tells Glenn why he believes his former boss Brennan belongs in prison and what must happen to prevent a full-blown trust implosion in American institutions.