RADIOMay 04, 2023

New WHISTLEBLOWER claims may MASSIVELY incriminate Joe Biden

At what point will the American people stand up against the Biden family corruption and say, ‘enough is enough’? Or, will they never take a stand, so that our most dishonest D.C. politicians continue to escape their crimes completely, 100 percent consequence-free? Now, new whistleblower claims — if true — could MASSIVELY incriminate Joe Biden even more. In fact, Glenn says, if these claims are true, it could be the biggest presidential scandal in American HISTORY. Glenn details the new claims and explains why they’re SO damning for Joe…

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I'm really fascinated to see how all of the corruption stuff around the Bidens, and throughout our government. Works out in the end.

Do the American people actually stand up and say, hey. Enough is enough?

Do they care? Does anything happen, or do they all get away with it? I can't wait for the ending.

STU: Yeah. I was going to say, these are all rhetorical questions. I don't want to be sad enough to answer them. It doesn't seem like --

GLENN: It doesn't seem like -- but I will tell you, there is a point coming, that we either completely are just absorbed into this corrupt system. Or Americans begin to stand up and say, enough is enough.

You know, it was 1854 or '56, where, you know, a senator stood up in the well of the Senate, by himself. And they were talking about slavery. And he said, you people are hypocrites.

You are hypocrites. The two parties then were the Wigs, and the Democrats. And he said, you guys talk a good game. Yeah. We'll work on that one. When you're back home, you're not doing anything.

Neither of you guys, neither party is serious about solving any problems. Meanwhile, the South is sleeping with the whore of slavery. That got him almost beaten to death in the well of the Senate.

Now, you think that's bad?

This is worse! Not only was he almost beaten to death. The guy who beat him to death, was a congressman. He used his cane to do it. Beat him in the head. Sumner was never the same. And no one stopped him.

No one on the Senate floor.

No -- you know, the color guard didn't show up. Nobody showed up, to pull that guy off of him.

Then he was never prosecuted. He was never questioned. He was never arrested.

Ever! Instead, the Democrats came back into session. And they had made chains with his little -- with a little mock cane. On it.

And they wore it outside of their clothes. Basically saying, you want to -- you want some of this?

You bring this up, and we'll do it you to, okay?

That was the end. That day, marked the end of the status quo. It's -- there's going to be an event. Somebody is going to stand up and say, enough. Enough.

I don't know what it is. But it's coming. But it's coming.

Honestly, I was reading the news today. You have to get the email newsletter. Today, it's like, oh, my gosh.

It's just crazy. Get the email newsletter. GlennBeck.com. It's free.

But I'm going through all of that. And I'm looking and reading all the stories. And at some point, this morning, I -- I actually stopped and went, okay. I -- I can get the idea of the normalcy bias. I can get the idea that everybody has been pushed into a corner. But I really don't understand, anybody -- and maybe that there's no honest people. Anyone who is honestly looking at things, I don't know how you don't get -- how bad the situation is.

Because it's everywhere.

We'll get into this later. Epstein. You know, when Epstein died. It was kind of a joke. Oh, it was the Clintons. Kind of a joke.

And we thought, maybe, somebody that was involved in the sex ring, you know, offed him. And there were a lot of powerful people.

I don't believe that anymore.

Well, I didn't really believe it then. I was like, there was a shot. But I don't know. I didn't know.

Now! Oh. I don't believe he was killed by the Clintons. He was killed by government operatives. Everybody -- that guy was a spy. That guy was in the intelligence community.

STU: You may have to boil this case a little bit more in-depth further. Because I believe the official designation was suicide still.

GLENN: Yeah. I'm just telling you. When you look at what's going on, all -- everywhere. Where they are glorifying pedophilia. They don't care about the kids on the border.

It's just evil, running rampant. And I think he was a -- I thought -- I think he was doing, you know, honey pot stuff. And working for the government.

And there's been speculation on that, all the time. But everything seems to connect. Did you see that the Epstein bank -- think it's JPMorgan. We'll get into this later. The judge just ruled, there's enough evidence for this to go to court. The charge is: They knew that Epstein's funds were coming from this kind of stuff. And payoffs were being made.

Now, I don't know if they can prove that in court.

But the judge. They wanted it thrown out. And the judge said, no. There's enough here.

STU: Executives are going to have to testify, right?

Jamie Dimon.

GLENN: Right. Right.

Now, let me go back to the whistle-blower. Whistle-blower stories I love.

The whistle-blower story now, the new one. I would like to hear. It's like a chorus of whistles.

I would like to hear them blow at once.

The whistle-blower is alleging that the FBI and Justice Department are in possession of a document, that describes a criminal scheme, involving then vice president Joe Biden, and a foreign national, relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions.

Is this coming from Grassley's office. Grassley is not a bomb thrower.

Grassley. I mean, he's too old. I don't think he can pick up and lift and throw the bomb.

But he's not a bomb thrower.

Also, it comes from the committee chairperson, James Comer.

These guys, it's not the same, as -- I don't know.

You know, if you took Marjorie Green.

This is not the same as that. These two have credibility. Now, they say, the document includes a precise description of how the alleged criminal scheme was employed as well as its purpose.

The document and FBI generated FD1023 form, if there's anybody who knows what that is, that was put in this story, I'll bet for a reason.

Allegedly details an arrangement involving an exchange of money for policy decisions.

They issued a subpoena yesterday, following legally protected disclosures, to Grassley's office.

They wrote, we believe the FBI possesses an unclassified internal document, that includes very serious and detailed allegations, implicating the current President of the United States.

What we don't know, is what, if anything, the FBI has done to verify these claims or investigate further. The FBI's recent history of botching politically charged investigations, demands close congressional oversight.

So what you need to know on this is: This -- this could be a charge, that they had. They investigated.

It went nowhere. Because it was an empty charge. Nothing was really there.

However, the whistle-blower has seen this document, and has led -- or leading people to believe, yeah. They didn't do anything.

They buried this.

With their recent burials that they're doing. Just even on Hunter Biden. Why has that guy not been charged? Why has he not been charged for any crime. Any crime.

And they said, well, we will get him on a couple of tax things.

Tax things. How about drugs? How about drugs?

I mean, even if it's not true. Which it absolutely is. The paperwork is in.

All of the money being laundered going to the family. There's nothing after, what? Four years of knowing all of this stuff? There's nothing?

No action. This, and I think Biden is too smart to do this.

At one point, he had all of his faculties.

I can't imagine, that he was like, oh, you want that policy. Well, let me look at the menu here.

That one is 14.99. Now, you want a policy on climate change.

I can get you into something there for 800 bucks. I can't believe that he was that stupid.

STU: Glenn, they -- they literally left a laptop at a computer repair shop.

GLENN: No. That is his heroin son.

STU: I know. But I had that -- I think I said the same thing on the air, the day that Hunter Biden story came out.

There's no way he's that stupid. He left his laptop at a computer repair shop.

That can't be possibly true. Then guess what, it was.

I don't know. They weren't very good at covering their tracks. Of all the things that Bidens too well. And there's so many of them. This doesn't seem one of them. The idea that they can commit crimes and cover them.

GLENN: Well, they don't have to cover them. They just think they can get away with it. Which, again, leads me back to things like Epstein.

Nobody is investigating these things. Nobody is investigating them.

Do you trust the investigations of the FBI, the Justice Department? Do you trust our NSA, our CIA? Our CIA is spying on us. Our CIA is thinking we are the problem. We are the enemy.

They are doing everything to protect the government, not the people.

If they're involved in anything like with a Jeffrey Epstein, do you think they're going to expose that?

No. No way. No way.

And anybody who helps them. I mean, look at the media. How do you possibly explain the media not reporting that, gee. All of our sources have been lying to us.

All of our sources. You know, national security source.

Source deep in the intelligence community, told us. That's what they've been saying for six years.

All their sources are national intelligent sources. Okay?

It's CIA. NSA. And they have been feeding them incorrect information. Over and over and over again.

And now, we know, that it was intentional. It was planned. You could have said, well, CIA. They're always wrong. No. No.

Now we know, these things were planned, plotted, and executed, and we have the goods on it.

Why is the press still not talking about it?

Because they have been co-opted bay our national security apparatus. They are just an arm of that apparatus. And if you don't think that happens, then you've got to go back and read our own history. This is what the Church Commission found back in the '70s. They had co-opted the media. And we were supposed to have oversight. But the oversight is -- they classified everything now, so even Congress members.

They can't get the documents. How many times did -- did the White House file a subpoena for documents from the Justice Department. Or from CIA.

No. Can't turn it up. Yeah. We can't get those. We can't get those you to.

In the darkness. In the darkness is where all of this corrupt stuff happens.

And there is no one shining the light on it. Thank God for the internet. Thank God for people who have brains, and are thinking, and are still willing to question.

More in just a second. What do you think your mobile phone company is doing with the money that you send them every month? Normally that would be a weird question, because I don't really care what people do with it. That's their choice, if you provided a good service.

However, providing food service means you're not trying to destroy me, my family. And everything I stand for. You know.

Donate money to Planned Parenthood. N. No. No, thank you.

I don't want any of my money. Any.

It's kind of a valid concern now. So you do business with people that don't do things like that with your money.

Patriot Mobile. America's only Christian conservative wireless provider, offers dependable, nationwide coverage on all three major networks, so you get the best possible service in your area. But you aren't simultaneously helping fund woke propaganda, by spending your money with the big mobile companies.

Listen, we've got to stand with the people, who are standing with us. We have to show -- it's not enough to show Bud Light that we're not going to buy your beer. When you have somebody who is working in our favor, and they're on our side, and they have a product that is just as good, if not better. And saves you money, there is no excuse, for not switching. You think it's hassle? It's not going to be. Get the free activation with the offer code Beck. Ask about their coverage guarantee while you're there. PatriotMobile.com/Beck. PatriotMobile.com/Beck.

Or 878PATRIOT. 878PATRIOT.

Ten-second station ID.
(music)
We are not going to -- we are going to treat these whistle-blowers exactly the same way, we treated the other whistle-blowers. If you have the goods, great.

But we're not going to condemn somebody on things that we don't have the goods on.

When it comes to the money in China. You have the goods. It's all there. This one, we have no idea. Nobody has actually seen the document, I think, except for the whistle-blower.

If the goods are there, great. We need to find out about it. We need to know about it, and make a decision there.

This is far more serious. This will be -- if this is true, this is the biggest scandal of an American president, in the history of America.

There is no bigger scandal than a president, or a vice president, taking money from a foreign entity to affect our policies.

Nothing bigger. Nothing bigger.

But let's wait and see, what the whistle-blower actually has. And what the FBI did about it.

Just because he has a document that says these allegations, that still doesn't mean he did it.

STU: Right. There's a lot to find out. But it's an amazing thing. They will be going into full spin mode. Which is what they do. You mentioned, they basically lead the coverage. And this goes back to the -- the most on the record thing we have from that is Rhodes from the Obama administration. Remember this quote? It's still one of the most remarkable quotes that's ever come out.

Talking about the Iran Deal. How they sold the Iran Deal to the American people. All these newspapers -- this is an Obama administration official. All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus. Now they don't. They call us to explain to them, what's happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talked to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That's a sea change. They literally know knowing.

That's an on-the-record quote from an Obama official.

GLENN: It's true.

STU: It's true. This is how they get away with this stuff.

GLENN: This is true. When I first got into national broadcast and we were at CNN. Do you remember, I did a couple of interviews, with big legendary names in the industry. And I would come off the floor and go, that person has no idea what they're even talking about. They don't care. They're not interested.

They have no idea. They have questions that a producer handed. So it was bad then. But now you have people that were trained in college. And they were told, this is what journalism really is. Which it's not.

And they have no experience.

And they're just going in and trusting them.

Will Trump HIT Iran with a “bunker buster” bomb?

Will President Trump get America involved in Israel’s war with Iran by helping drop a “bunker buster” bomb on Iran’s main nuclear facility? Would that cross a red line? Glenn Beck asks House Foreign Affairs Committee member, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who explains why she believes such debates are pointless right now. Plus, Rep. Luna addresses a 1980s CIA "playbook" that exposes a strategy to "set off riots and destabilize governments."

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Representative Anna Paulina Luna is joining us now.

Congresswoman from the great state of Florida. You guys are kicking it, down in Florida.

I mean, you really -- you're making Texas look bad, quite honestly. But thanks for coming on.

ANNA: Thanks, Glenn. I would like to say, we're leading the nation not just in politics, but also the White House. So happy to be here.

GLENN: Yeah. All right. I have to ask you a little bit, about are we going to war? What's happening? Is this negotiation? What does your gut tell you on this?

ANNA: My gut is telling me, that we're not intervening. And based on the president's statement, he is still rightfully so, urging everyone to negotiate. Right now, he's definitely been very open about this.

But I don't want to -- what I will tell you, in the last 24 to 48 hours, I have seen so much disinformation circulating on the internet. Well, a lot of it not coming from security that is in the states, so I will tell everyone. That don't jump to conclusions, don't read into anything, that senator Lindsey Graham is saying or any other members of Congress, that are speculating, that there will be direct intervention. In fact, the White House just yesterday via Alex Sipher on X posted that the military is not intervening. We're simply defending our own. And so what I will tell Americans is first and foremost, President Trump has not changed his position on foreign policies. If he wanted to strike, he would have done it by now. So everyone needs to pray for him. Pray for our country. Pray for the millions in both Iran and Israel right now, and let the process play out.

GLENN: Can you tell me, do you think it's a red line to send over a bomber with one bomb?

Is that -- does that drag us into war?

Or is that just helping?

ANNA: I would say, as of right now, we need to not speculate, but continue to back the White House's position.

Because I think if I were to speculate on where the red line is, I don't think it helps.

I do think that our allies and adversaries are looking to see the members of Congress are doing. I will back the White House's position currently. Which is defending our service members and not intervening --

GLENN: It is. I'm so glad to hear you say that. That is exactly what I just said on the air. Just about three minutes ago.

ANNA: Oh, really?

GLENN: I said, yeah. The world is watching. You don't think the mullahs aren't watching everything that is said on X. You know, we must used to have these conversations where it was global. We're now in a global atmosphere.

And they're watching all of us.

And we can't eat ourselves up. Or they will -- if he's telling the truth.

I think a good negotiator, never bluffs. And he has to back it up.

You know, 60 days. You don't want to see what happens on day 61.

He wasn't bluffing.

And if they think, that we are eating ourselves, alive, they're more likely to go, no.

You know what, go ahead. Go ahead.

It's a really bad thing.

ANNA: What I will say, it's definitely a litmus test for our country right now. You're seeing a lot of people, jumping to conclusions. What I will tell you, there's only a very select few that fully understand what's happening in the situation room.

That's the president, his team, and it's left up there to you. What I will tell you, don't read in, don't speculate. And also too don't jump to conclusions.

Again, in the last 48 hours, I went online. I put out information, because I saw so much information circulating. Something that was said by Kash Patel. His CCP has engaged in basically election engineering. We just saw that in the 2020 election cycle.

They just got busted. This also comes on the tail end of these riots that are absolutely being hunted by the CCP. Neville Singham getting lots of money from them.

And it doesn't stop there.

We saw there was an -- so what I would say is that, you know, I'm partially inclined to think some of these accounts that are attacking the president, are foreign policy positions right now.

Are coming from China. Everything that we're seeing. Three times, that they've done things.

So we have to stick together. It's not, Democrat versus Republican right now. It's America, and fighting for Western civilization.

And so we need to make sure that we're very responsible about our commentary right now.

GLENN: Very good. Very good.

Can we talk a little bit about the -- let's start with Neville Singham.

The guy is -- he is an operative for the CCP. And he is pouring tons of money. And no one in the mainstream media, wants to talk about it.

They just -- oh, that's ridiculous. No, it's not.

Can you give us some information on --

ANNA: Yeah. Of course. So it's not ridiculous. In fact, there's a lot of money -- money at least back to Neville Singham. And I actually look at credit where it's due. So I was on X. And came across this account called Data Republican, and she actually pulled the money trail right to Singham. He also lives part time in Shanghai, China, and he's not registered as a foreign agent.

And so I was able to talk to Comer, and every single member of oversight after seeing the evidence that was presented, actually sent a letter, signed off on it, not just to Neville Singham, but also, to AG Bondi to also request an investigation.

And so what I will tell you is that this should have been done during BLM in Congress back then.

It was not. This needs to be replicated moving forward with everybody else who is engaging, who is not a registered foreign agent in this country.

Also, funding riots like this. In some instances have been acts of terrorism.

And so right now, it's not just a playbook for Neville Singham. We're also -- this is also up to Comer. Because Comer has subpoena authority. Whether or not he will send his subpoena to George Soros, which I've urged him to do.

Even though, Neville Singham is a Marxist and Soros is a globalist, but their end objective is, again, to dismantle the United States.

And so we're basically being hit from both sides right now.

GLENN: I am so -- it is so refreshing.

I mean, I've been talking about this stuff for 20 years.

It's so refreshing. Finally, to have some people step up, and present this in a credible way, in Congress.

And to the -- attorney general et cetera, et cetera.

You know, you had the playbook from 1983. From the CIA.

And this is -- you know, I think it was two or three years ago.

No. It was in 2019 or 2020.

I did a special on the -- you know, the Colour Revolutions.

And how there was the CIA playbook that was out.

And it looks exactly like what is happening here in the United States. I said -- I said, at the time, here's what's coming. And it's all here.

It -- where are you taking this?

And is there anybody, that, you know, can -- can stop this?

Because this -- we are -- we're using CIA tactics on ourself.

ANNA: Well, I would say, the CCP is using this against us.

Right now, just first and foremost.

Yes. We can stop it.

We have to go after the money stream. And I actually also found out via the data Republican.

That $270 million in the USAID fund, was issued to George Soros' NGOs prior to Biden getting out of office.

President Trump can stop that, sending a letter via executive order because Congress is moving very slow.

That's I think a separate conversation.

But we can stop the money streams. And if we don't do anything, though. If we don't do the investigations.

If we don't say, you cannot do this in our country, you're also, by the way, guilty of violating foreign agent registration, the Foreign Registration app, the FAR app. It's just going to continue happening.

So we have to do the due diligence on this.

And if not, every single member of oversight signed off on that.

And to Chairman Comer's credit, he will be playing ball with Singham. So it's going to happen.
It's just, When will it happen?

So the time line, it's possibly indicated on Friday. We're waiting for a response.

He's going to be called to testify.

We are looking at all transaction records.
That's the first thing. The second thing, I want to give some people hope. I actually know Director Radcliffe over at the CIA.

And the CIA back then, remember, there's both good and bad people at the intelligence agencies.

And to their credit, the people that he has appointed, actually are a people like you and I.

And so they are doing their best to weed out this corruption at the agencies. And so what's really been brilliant in all of this.

Kash Patel is also following up on these money trails, to see what outside foreign influences are engaging in this Colour Revolution here in the United States, and he's dropping that information now. So in previous administrations, this might not have happened.

But in this one, they're stopping it, and it's because of social media and kudos to Elon Musk, that we were able to get the information in time, in regards to the No Kings protest, who is funding that.
In regards to potential insider packets that were going to frame conservatives. Frame Republicans.

We are seeing this all unfold in real time. I will tell you, Hispanic Americans, specifically, are not used as pawns. So when you have basically BLM 2.0 happening right now at these ICE riots, and you realize that these are actually largely ANTIFA that are going to be questioned. They're why they're not Hispanic. They're not immigrant.

They have no ties to the communities, and they're simply interning, you know, Mexican flags or BLM flags. That doesn't bode well in the community.

Remember, Hispanic Americans are largely voted for in favor for President trump.

So there is hope. But you can't sit on your hands. You have to get active, you have to get engaged, and you have to be telling people that.

GLENN: You know, for years, I've been angry at the billionaires on the right. That have just not stepped up to the plate.

I really, I suspected with the tides foundation and then with Biden and you all of these green new deals, and everything going on. That money was being funneled off the top.

And then as soon as we appointed DOGE. I said, oh, my gosh. The money is coming from us.

Then he started to find him. That is so critically important. Are we going to stop that funding?

ANNA: Well, yes. And so that's what we've been doing with some of these rescission packages at the White House, that has authorized. We have to move quickly. And we have to be more aggressive with it.

I will tell you, remember, I think just in general, sometimes people can be lazy.

And so what I've been telling people, is you have no idea, the level of personal sacrifice, that Elon really took on.

From taking on DOGE. Especially going after USAID. Which is just like a pot of just corrupt nonsense.

He actually just released, as we were about to call in. He released drug testing results. He had himself drug testing. Because they were saying, he was doing all this crazy stuff.

And he wasn't. Right? They've attacked companies. They literally used his personal family matters in the press. And then they tried to drag a wedge between him and the president.

So what I will tell you is, it's not just him. It's any member of Congress of the Senate. You saw what happened with the president. They tried to assassinate him twice.

Okay?

So if you take this on, the American people need to back these people up.

Because it's not like we're taking it on, because we, you know, want to have our personal lives and our family members put on the line here.

It's because it's the right thing to do. And if we don't do it, who will?

You have to really make sure, everyone sitting together. Remember, look out for the disinformation campaign.

And keep supporting people who do the right went.

Because we need more of them.

GLENN: Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna.

Congresswoman, thank you.

JEFFY: Thanks Glenn.

GLENN: You bet. We'll talk again.

The KEY to understanding Trump’s threats to Iran

Many Americans are debating whether President Trump will attack Iran and help Israel, or if he’ll keep his promise to stay out of this war. Glenn Beck explains what he believes is the key to understanding Trump’s

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I think America is all warred out. I know I am.

I'm all warred out. We've been the police. War's policemen since I've been a kid.

It's never helped us. It's never done anything, except push us towards bankruptcy, and more of our people killed.

You know, we've had Afghanistan. Iraq. Libya. And they ended for, what?

Nothing. Nothing.

What did we get out of that? Nothing!

Are we safer?

No. We're not safer. Look at our streets. Look what's coming across our border.

We have 8,000 terrorists, in our country, right now!

That didn't make us safer by any stretch of the imagination. What did we do that for?

We've also been lied to by our government, over and over and over again.

At least the last 100 years on this progressive nonsense, on the State Department, and how they want to fight wars now.

There hasn't been a real end of a real war, in how long?

Since World War II?

There's not -- are these all police actions. And they never -- they don't seem to work out.

I'm done with all of that. I think you are too. And we can't afford another war.

Now, that being said, I think Iran and I've said this since 2003, Iran is the head of the snake.

It wasn't Afghanistan.

It wasn't Iraq. You know, I thought the strategy from Bush was to take Afghanistan and Iraq and squeeze forever the government of Rand Paul.

Enough to have it topple and let the people take over, in Iran.

But that didn't -- I don't think that was even their strategy. I think that was me maybe hoping.

You know, and all the talk about the nukes in Iran, I have a hard tame. You know, weapons of mass destruction. George Bush. They weren't there.

They weren't there.

So now they have -- I mean, I've heard since, what?

Now. 2005.

Iran could be just days away from a nuclear weapon. Then once they have one, then they could produce all the -- I don't know. I've heard this since 2005. You have no credibility with me anymore, that they're just days away from a nuclear weapon!

Now, are they days away? Maybe!

I don't know.

So what do we do?

Well, I'm pretty happy with the current course.

Israel seems to be doing a bang up job.

You know, and have you noticed, it's not really causing any more problems in the streets.

In Saudi Arabia, or Egypt. Or any other place.

They all seem to be cool with what's going on.

And why is that? Because everyone in the Middle East knows this is right. What is Egypt doing? First of all, maybe we should be a little more like Egypt, you know, without the authoritarian regime. Maybe we should look at our borders the way Egypt looks at its border with the Palestinians!

You know, there's a two-story wall, all just -- I mean, it is razor wire everywhere.

Nobody is coming across that border, coming out of -- of -- of the Palestinian section, into Egypt.

They don't want them.

Strangely, neither does Jordan. Strangely, neither does the UAE. Strangely, neither does Saudi Arabia, or any other Gulf culture. They don't want them. Why?

Because revolution always follows.

Thus, let me again, bring you back to Egypt. What happened over the weekend.

All these Palestinian protesters. The kinds that are on our streets.

The Palestinians just -- I mean, the Egyptians just picked them up.

Put them on a bus. And said, get hell out of here. Or we'll throw you in jail.

We can't protest peaceful. No. Not in Egypt.

It's not America.

You're not doing that in Egypt. And one of the reasons why you're not doing that in Egypt. Egypt knows, the Palestinians, no matter where they go. They sew the he seeds of revolution.

That's been the pattern over and over and over again, when one of the Gulf states take them.

So why is that a problem for Donald Trump to do exactly what the Egyptians and the Saudis and the UAE, and everybody else is doing. Which is, hey, Israel, keep going!

I mean, I'm not going to say that out loud. But keep going.

Can we help you with anything on that one? Because don't turn around on us. We will deny it.

But go ahead. They're all doing that!

All of them! What is the other thing they're doing? They're not siding with the Palestinians. They're not letting the Palestinian, you know, revolution break out in their countries.

So why is it such a problem in our country? To do what they're doing!

Which leads me to believe, maybe, just maybe, there's a lot of anti-Semitism on this one.

I've never seen a country exercise a war this precisely as the one that Israel is doing. I mean, it's unbelievable.

It's unbelievable.

Okay. So now, let me take to you the third part of what I want you to really think about.

Are we actually preparing for war?

Because every sign says yes. And maybe we are. I don't know.

Every sign says yes. We are mobilizing.

We are moving assets in. Yesterday, I think it was the Israelis said, everybody needs to get out of Tehran. That looks like massive bombing coming there. That doesn't seem like Israel. Does it?

We're talking about maybe using one of our B52s. And the only bomb that can get into the plant, to be able to get under the mountain to take out their nuclear facilities.

We're the only ones that can do it, and we're talking about doing that. However, at the same time, Donald Trump said, no, to killing the leaders of Iran. Which were the leaders that put the plan in place for the assassination of Donald Trump.

So it doesn't seem like he's being vindictive here.

What is actually happening?

How do you make sense of the world?

May I just suggest, what do you know about Donald Trump?

What do you know at the core of his being, who he is?

You know that he is a pro-tariff guy.

You know that he hates war.

To the core.

You know that he's terrified of nuclear war.

And he's a negotiator. I don't think that's in the right order.

I think he's a negotiator first. And when you negotiate at this high level, you don't tell everyone what you're doing.

First of all, the first thing you have to do is establish credibility.

And especially in a country like Iran, where the American president has never had any credibility.

Because they say, you know what, you cross this red line. And you're done. Then they cross the red line. And they're like, okay. Well, don't cross this red line or you're done.

Then they cross that red line, and nothing happens! Okay. Well, don't cross it. Shut up with your red line. It means nothing to us anymore.

What did Donald Trump do?

He gave Iran 60 days to negotiate. Sixty days.

What happened at midnight on Day 61?

Israel unleashed hell on them.

Donald Trump said, you have 60 days. And please, get to the negotiating table. You don't want to see what happens on Day 61.

Don't do it. Don't. Don't.

I'm holding them at bay. Don't. Let's negotiate. Okay? Now he has credibility.

So now when they're talking about, you know what, what we might do. He will say, yeah. Well, I'm talked to Israel, about letting them use that bunker buster.

You know, I also think you're a really dangerous knight right now. I think, you know, put us on a war footing, would you?

Now the American people are looking at Donald Trump going, he just might do it. Are we going to war? He just might do it.

What do you think Iran is saying? Iran is saying the same thing! Oh, good God. He just told us 60 days.

He's not bluffing. He's not bluffing.

The guy does not bluff. He's nuts. He's insane.

Whatever you want to say about him. He's a negotiator. And the one thing that Iran really does not understand, I think is negotiating from the best negotiator in the world.

But I am afraid the American people don't understand that either.

Now, I could be wrong. So I'm not saying this is what's going on.

But I believe this is what's happening.

I believe he's negotiating.

And, you know, he will follow it up.

But what did he say?

As soon as the bombs went out. He said, I told them, 60 days. A, establish credibility.

Then the next statement was, please come back to the table. Or it's only going to get worse.

Okay?

Then while the whole world is watching the G7, something happens, and he flies back. He leaves the G7. And he flies back, at 3:00 a.m. He arrives, and he goes directly in to the situation room, and they're moving assets around the world.

And then says, hey. Iran, you should negotiate. You should negotiate.

We're still at the negotiation table. I would suggest you get back.

How freaked out do you think they are?

Now, here's the thing. Have you ever been in tough negotiations with somebody, and they start to say things. And you're like, wait. This wasn't part of the plan.

We didn't discuss this.

But they're the leader. What should you do? If you're in negotiations, you should be going, yeah.

Yeah. We talk about that. You know, all day long. You go out in a hallway. Or you go into another room, and you go, what are you doing?

What are you doing?

We didn't talk about this. But you never say it at the table. Never.

Because if they spot any division, that game is over. So what's happening online?

Right now, we're dividing ourselves. I think the president is negotiating. I -- I know the president hates war. I know the president hates nuclear war.

I know the president likes Israel, but he's not wanting to fight their wars.

I know the president knows how much trouble we're in, with Islamic extremism, especially the kind that comes from the Twelvers in Iran!

If I know all of those things to be true, he's negotiating. And he's hoping that Israel will do the job we won't have to.

But we can back them up by being tough negotiators. And saying, you know what, go ahead. Put us on a war footing.

Because then, their side is at the table going, what the hell, is this guy -- and somebody at the table is going, he told us 60 days. In sixty days, we were having bombs raining down on us.

He will do it!

But there's also somebody at the table that said, eh, just lost Tucker Carlson. That guy helped him get elected. Eh, just lost, you know, whoever, Sean Hannity and Mark Levin and Glenn Beck.

And they're all fighting against each other. He's not going to be able to hold his base together.

If he's -- if he's bluffing, fine. If he's not bluffing, it won't be long, because they'll tear him apart.

Now, how does that -- because you, and me, and Tucker, and Sean. And, I mean, it used to be just the big anchors, on CBS. ABC. NBC.

Now it's not just even us. It's you!

They're watching us, as we're sitting at the table. We're blinking.

Repeatedly. I -- I don't know what -- I don't know.

I have no inside information.

I just think, I know Donald Trump, and what he abhors. I know Donald Trump on what he is terrified of.

And that is nuclear war. And global war.

He knows that will be the end of us. All of us. I just don't see him as that guy.

And so I have to ask, is the world's best negotiator, now negotiating? And I believe the answer is yes. For the first time, you have a president that is a good negotiator.

Stop blinking. That doesn't mean I'm for war. It just means, stop blinking!

Glenn Beck EXPOSES the Globalist/United Nations 'Mass Migration Plot'

Why has there been a major push for mass migration of unvetted immigrants into America in recent years? Glenn Beck reveals how it all ties back to the United Nations’ conspicuously updated list of "Sustainable Development Goals." Mass migration suddenly became useful to globalists, and after four years of Joe Biden as President, we now find ourselves in a precarious position.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: The REAL Reason for the Surge in Illegal Immigration

The One REAL "Nuclear Threat" that Everyone Ignores!

Is America prepared for a serious attack that could take down the power grid and destabilize society? We sometimes take for granted that a nuclear attack is too far-fetched to really occur, but could nuclear weapons be used in an Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack? Glenn Beck breaks down the possibility and poses the question of the true preparedness of American society should such a thing actually occur.

Watch the FULL Episode HERE: Prepping 101: The Step-by-Step Guide to Surviving Global Chaos