THIS is why we should LEAVE the United Nations
RADIO

THIS is why we should LEAVE the United Nations

The United Nations has been covering up scandals connected to its Peacekeepers for decades and NOBODY has done anything about it. On top of this, the U.N. has clearly become a tool for global elites to force their agendas on the rest of the world. So, maybe it's time that the United States cuts ties with the globalist group. That's what Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Representatives Chip Roy (R-TX) and Mike Rogers (R-AL) are now proposing. Glenn reviews their plan to not just defund the U.N., but cut ties with it and its affiliated entities, like the W.H.O.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: I don't know if you saw this story about the UN.

Borjo was earning $7,000 a month, as the head of logistics in the peacekeeping commission in Goma. I don't even know where Goma is, do you?

PAT: No.

GLENN: He was getting locals to procure children for him. He had two assets that ensured children trusted him: He was white, and he worked for the United Nations.

PAT: Oh, you can always trust white people. Right?

GLENN: Sure. Always.

PAT: Isn't that a pretty hard-core rule of thumb.

GLENN: Yeah. Yeah. He said the sex was consensual. But was unsure if the children were afraid of saying no. I'm not sure. I don't think so. But I'm not sure. Could be.

PAT: Oh, my gosh.

GLENN: After the Congolese police arrested him, and the French authorities jailed him for nine years in 2008, the UN made a public promise to help his victims. That promise was never kept. The UN said, it could never find the victims.

PAT: I'll bet they tried really hard. Really, really hard. They're probably still looking right now.

GLENN: Well.

PAT: No? Oh.

GLENN: No.

Fortunately, Channel 4, I don't know where Channel 4 is. Maybe this is Channel 4 from the BBC. Fourteen years on, we investigated sex abuse for Channel 4.

It took only one afternoon for my producer to find four women, who he had raped when they were children.

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: The hunting ground was the slums. And the airport where barefoot children in ragged clothes scamper through the alleyways.

Adults remember the rapes well. One girl was 14, when she used to sell bananas by the side of the road to pay for her education. Luring her with promises of help, for six months, he took her to a hotel where he abused her.

He was so old, as old as my father.

He was a civilian, part of the culture of UN personnel having sex with prostitutes, including children. More than a decade on.

That culture still persists. This story goes on to say how horrible these peacekeepers are from the United Nations.

We have known this story forever, Pat.

We've heard about the blue helmets going in. And raping women and children, for decades. Decades

PAT: True. Yeah.

GLENN: And nobody has done anything about it.

PAT: Yeah. And they're not just inept, or ineffective.

They're evil.

GLENN: They're evil. They're evil.

Mike Lee, Chip Roy, and representative Mike Rogers of Alabama, now are pushing paper that would cut all of our ties to the UN. And all of its affiliated entities, including the World Health Organization.

The UN doesn't deserve a single dime of American taxpayer money or one bit of our support.

PAT: That's for sure.

GLENN: We should defund it, and leave it immediately.

And I'm proud to leave this critical effort alongside with Mike Lee and Mike Rogers.

This is Chip Roy. No more blank checks from the United Nations.

America's hard-earned dollars have been funneled in the initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry.

With the Defund Act, we're stepping away from this debacle.

If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate. And the ironclad escape clause. This is fantastic.

PAT: And not only should we leave it. We should force them to leave us. Get off our continent.

GLENN: This is not our continent.

What about Canada and Mexico

PAT: Okay. Well, get off our mainland. Get out of our country

GLENN: Get off our island. Yeah!

That will show you.

PAT: Seriously, doesn't that belong in Europe? Shouldn't they be in Belgium, just like the European Union is, and every other one world organization, known to man, including NATO.

Get them over there. They would love them over there.

GLENN: Yeah.

PAT: Well, they do love them.

GLENN: I don't know if the people love them anymore.

PAT: Not the people, but certainly the European bureaucrats love them.

GLENN: The bureaucrats over here love them

PAT: Thank you.

GLENN: I've never seen a time where our bureaucrats are more out of step, all over the world.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: I said this, I don't know.

Four or five years ago.

This is not a war against Republican and Democrat.

This is truly between the elites, and the people.

And that's what's happening all over the world.

That's what's happening in China.

That's what's happening in France.

And the Scandinavian. Countries. And Germany.

PAT: I wonder if that's why, people who are similar to Donald Trump, at least in rhetoric, or in delivery.

GLENN: It is.

PAT: Are winning, all over the world.

GLENN: Yes. It is.

PAT: Yeah. Argentina. The Netherlands. I mean, did you ever think Geert Wilders would be elected?

GLENN: No.

No.

PAT: The head of the Netherlands. No way. No way.

GLENN: Is he? Is he?

Did he make it to Prime Minister?

PAT: They thought he was going to.

GLENN: But he didn't. He just missed it. Just shy of it.

PAT: That was really amazing.

GLENN: Yeah. We were advised by everybody. Not to have him on.

He came to America. He came into the studios

We had him on. And everybody was like, you can't have him on.

He's a racist, radical, big on the.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: No. Not so far.

I mean, you know, doesn't have enough power, to really show it.

But doesn't seem to be in any way, shape, or form

PAT: No. Yeah.

GLENN: And the same thing with the guy in Argentina.

That guy looks great.

PAT: He does. He does. He's just outspoken.

And people for some reason recoil at that.

They don't -- they don't like outspoken leaders, I guess.

People who just -- who are sick and tired of pussy-footing around.

And just tell it like it is.

And that's what he does.

GLENN: But that's not -- the people are not tired of that at all.

They're not that at all.

PAT: No. They're not. The left is tired. The left certainly doesn't want that.

GLENN: Correct. They don't want anyone speaking out.

Because they are the fascists.

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: And this was brought up yesterday by a few people.

We talked about it yesterday. When Joe Biden says he's going to just take the -- the formulas, and just take the --

PAT: Can you believe that?

From the drug companies. And we're supposed to be okay with that. Because the pharmaceuticals are all evil giants, who make too much money. And charge us too much.

But I'm sorry. This is about freedom. This can't be about the government just seizing control of everything they want.

GLENN: Beyond that, they don't think they're bad.

PAT: That's very true.

They're in bed with Pfizer, and Moderna.

GLENN: Yes. Yes. I was never against big pharmaceutical. I thought big pharmaceutical, you know, it's a giant corporation.
Yes, it's probably not doing things.

But this is redistribution of wealth. This is, you know, to give to the -- give to the have-nots, and screw the haves. We've always paid more here in America for our drugs. So people who don't have as much, will pay less all around the country.

I've always thought, well, I don't like it. But okay.

Well, now you see the government and pharmaceutical companies have been in bed for a long time.

And all of a sudden, the left, who has been saying that forever.

PAT: They love those.

GLENN: Yeah, they love them.

PAT: They're best friends with the pharmaceuticals.

GLENN: Right. And now he's saying, screw the pharmaceutical companies. I'll just take their patents. You can't do that!

PAT: No.

They're doing so many things they can't do though. It's amazing. I don't think "can't" means what we thought it meant.

GLENN: I know. I know.

PAT: The other story that was really big yesterday, was -- was the FBI may be being thwarted in their civil asset forfeiture.

Civil asset forfeiture problem. Which happened in Los Angeles.

Remember that one, from two years ago?

GLENN: Oh, yeah.

PAT: They stole anywhere from 85 to $100 million worth of cash and goods from people.

GLENN: They went into this. I think it was Beverly Hills, wasn't it?

PAT: Yeah. It was.

GLENN: Kind of like mailboxes, et cetera.

Kind of vault. It's not a bank. It's just this giant vault. And people would rent safety-deposit boxes.

Well, there was one guy, who -- did they prove that he was doing things or not?

PAT: No. And it wasn't. I don't think it was an individual at all. It was the company supposedly that operated or owned the safety-deposit boxes.

And so they had the warrant to go look at the company's safety deposit boxes.

GLENN: Because they thought there might be illegal ill-gotten goods in their safety-deposit box

PAT: And they didn't find anything illegal there

But they were also ordered not to touch anybody else's safety deposit box. Any of the individuals there, not fair game.

They're off-limits, leave it alone. So what they did instead was get into all 1400 safety-deposit boxes. And took it.

GLENN: They took everything.

PAT: They took gold coins. They took jewelry. They took cash. To the tune of 85 to 100 million-dollars worth. And they didn't charge anybody with anything.

GLENN: And they said to the people, well, go ahead and fight us on this. You are part of it?

Are you part of the problem?

I mean, they threatened them with prosecution, if they said, hey. I want my stuff back.

So a lot of people were just like, I'm not going to fight with the United States government.

PAT: And in a lot of cases, they were wealthy people, and it didn't hurt them that bad. But that's beside the point. It's the principle of this thing.

You can't just steal from people. But they do.

GLENN: They do all the time. And it's not just the FBI. It's all the way down to our local police.

PAT: Yes.

GLENN: I mean, it's -- we have become Mexico.

Unless this stuff is stopped, when you put AI together, with the federal government and all of its private/public partnerships. There ain't nothing left.

There's nothing left. What do you think of the story today, that the Democrats are coming out, and they're saying, companies like BlackRock can't own private houses. They can't invest in private homes. And just buy them all up.

Wait a minute.

What?

PAT: Uh-huh.

GLENN: Why? What is that all about?

Why would the Democrats be leading that charge?

PAT: And I didn't know that was happening in the first place. Did you?

Were you aware of that. The investment from BlackRock. In individual homes.

GLENN: Vanguard and everything else. That's what is driving our property prices so high. They go in and buy entire neighborhoods.

Sometimes two and three times above the asking price.

So they just come in, and they buy everything, and then they hold it.

It is part of the you'll own nothing. You'll rent from us.

And so they're going in, and --

PAT: And how hard would that be, to turn that down?

Even if you're a big critic of BlackRock or Vanguard. They come in and say, I'll give you three times the market value. Uh, okay.

GLENN: Most people would not say no.

PAT: Right.

GLENN: I mean, I know a guy who is selling his house. Somebody from California came in. Some rich person from California came in.

And said, what are you asking for your house?

And he said, it's not for sale. And he said, well, we've looked at the houses. And, you know, your house is probably worth X amount. He put a million dollars on that amount, plus. And the guy --

PAT: Wow.

GLENN: And the guy went, wait. What?

And he said, and I'll give you another million if you're out by the end of the month. He was out. He was just out. He was like, buh-bye. You got it.

I'll load my car up starting right now.

PAT: Wow. If that's the case, I'm calling BlackRock to say, have you considered living in this neighborhood?

GLENN: I know. I know. I mean, it's crazy.

PAT: That is crazy.

GLENN: But I'm -- first of all, I don't like the government saying what investors can and can't invest in.

PAT: Right. A dangerous precedent.

Did the U.S. Government TELEPORT Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?!
RADIO

Did the U.S. Government TELEPORT Malaysia Airlines Flight 370?!

A decade ago, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared without a trace. Now, some are claiming this was a cover-up — by the U.S. GOVERNMENT! Glenn speaks with one of those people, investigative journalist Ashton Forbes, who claims that he has video evidence of what really happened. The alleged footage, which he claims was leaked from within the government, depicts a plane disappearing into what could be a worm hole created by three rotating orbs. Ashton lays out the science that he believes explains this … but does the government really have this game-changing technology? Glenn lets you decide …

Biden Sent HOW MANY Migrants to THIS Red State?!
RADIO

Biden Sent HOW MANY Migrants to THIS Red State?!

According to a new report, internal DHS data has revealed how the Biden administration has flown hundreds of thousands of “inadmissible” migrants into U.S. cities — and the top 15 cities are eye-opening. The controversial CHNV mass-parole program has used YOUR tax dollars to send migrants who have claimed refugee status all over the country. But the administration has brought the most migrants into the country BY FAR through airports in (of course) the red state of Florida. This is ON TOP of the record-high illegal immigration that we have seen under the Biden administration. So, what’s the goal here?

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: New internal DHS data reveals 45 US cities that hundreds of thousands of migrants that have felony into via the Biden administrations, controversial CHMV mass parole program.

It shows that the top 15 cities that migrants were flown into, on your tax dollar. On our airlines. Which you have to take your shoes off.

They have to know. I mean, come on over here.

Yeah. Every third person, we do a rectal exam.

Yeah. And now -- now we're just flying these people. Without knowing, who they really are. Doing it in the middle of the night.

Now, these aren't the people who go across the border.

Are these the ones who the United States government went out to, hey. Is anybody -- refugee. If you're a refugee, I've got free tickets to America.

So the top 15 cities, Miami, Florida, 91,000 people were flown in from January through August 2023.

Eight months. Eight months. Miami, Florida, Florida. 91,000.

Ft. Lauderdale. Which is the same city.

I mean, it's Miami Ft. Lauderdale.

STU: Yeah. I used to live in Ft. Lauderdale.

GLENN: It's part of Miami.

STU: It's a little bit of a drive to Miami. It's like Dallas/Fort Worth.

A couple cities close to each other.

GLENN: So Ft. Lauderdale got 60,000. And then New York City is number 3. They got 14,000. Wait a minute.

Wow! That's quite a spread there.

So, you know, they get 150,000, just in Miami, Ft. Lauderdale. And then 14,000 in New York. Houston --
STU: And think about what Eric Adams has said.

GLENN: Oh, I know.

STU: They're overrunning our communities, we can't do anything. Half the cities on this list are on one state. And New York City can't handle this.

GLENN: Yeah. They have 14,000. Then Houston has 8,000.

Orlando has 16,000. Another Florida.

Los Angeles, three. Tampa, another Florida. 3200. Dallas, Texas, is 2200.

San Francisco, 2,000. Atlanta, 2,000.

Newark, New Jersey.

I mean --

STU: Oh, people love Newark.

GLENN: Honestly, if you're like in some other place.

I don't care if they're torturing you. And they say, you want to come to the United States?

Sure. Where am I headed?

Newark, New Jersey. No, I'm going to hang out. I'm good. I'm good.

Put me back on the rack. It's false alarm. I'm not going anywhere.

STU: How are these decisions made?

GLENN: What do you mean?

STU: Do you know -- if you're someone coming in, you're an illegal immigrant, you're on this parole program.

And you come in. Do they say, hey. Here is your -- they have fliers come visit Orlando out there. Look through them until you pick one. Do they assign a city to you? Is it wherever your relatives are?

GLENN: I don't know. It's taken us forever, to get just this information.

STU: I know. It's true. It could be, that these people are like, look, I don't want to go to Newark. So I will pick Tampa or Orlando or Ft. Lauderdale.

My guess is, do you know anyone who lives there?

Yeah. My brother lives in Miami.

So they're flying them to Miami.

I don't know. Regardless, wouldn't the opposite be obvious, if you were honest here? If you're the Biden administration, you keep telling everyone that people in the south and the red states hate immigrants. They're racists. They're, you know, xenophobes. They don't have any programs for them.

So why would you continue to keep bringing them to Florida and Texas. Why?

Wouldn't you bring them to the cities, that have all these wonderful programs that you've passed. Why not?

GLENN: Well, unless you're trying to make sure that you fly them into a city, like Miami, Ft. Lauderdale. That's usually run by Democrats.

And you can have them vote.

STU: But -- but, again, it's not run currently by tells me.

GLENN: Miami, Ft. Lauderdale.

STU: Republican mayor. Remember, he ran for a short time, ran for president.

GLENN: I don't remember that. It was very short. Very short.

STU: Very short. But unless you have enemies, in red states and you realize that what you're doing is a punishment, right?

The same kind of thing that, you know, Greg Abbott did in Texas. You know what, we will send these people up to you guys. You guys deal with them.

Because we're being honest with them here. This is a strain on our society. And so we shouldn't be responsible for them. Because we want them to be stopped before they come in.

Right? All these other people are saying, we're welcoming. You're welcomed here. You will always be welcomed in New York City. I don't know if that one is expired. But that's what Eric Adams was saying when he was running for election.

GLENN: San Francisco.

STU: San Francisco. All these things. We went through and found all the quotes from these mayors.

All of them, welcomed with open arms, illegal who didn't notice. And invited them to come. And now when they actually show up, they realize what the situation is. You're taking a bunch of people who have no current path to earn enough to -- to house themselves. To feed themselves.

To give themselves basic humanitarian aid.

And then you're going to put that on the state, or local -- local communities.

GLENN: Imagine. Imagine your city. Knowing how large you are. You have an influx of 150,000 people.

Where are those jobs?

Where are the jobs for those people? You don't have a deficit of 150,000, you know, employees.


STU: Where do they work?

GLENN: Where are they working?

Where are they working?

By the way, a recent pew poll found that nearly two-thirds of Americans have little or no confidence that Joe Biden is physically fit to be president.

That's two-thirds. When you're talking about the immigration thing, 80 percent of America, wants them to be sent back home.

Okay?

They're starting to get really.

Quite, quite intense object the immigration thing.

And that's Republicans and Democrats.

Everybody knows that the economy is in flames.

Again, two-thirds have little or no confidence that Joe Biden is even physically fit to be president.

What the hell, how is this so close?

How is this so close?

I just -- it doesn't -- it doesn't make sense.

STU: People are not making judgments based on what's in front of them.

GLENN: No. They're not.

STU: They're these partisan. You know, these partisan lanes you get in. And it's impossible to escape them. I don't know. For 80 percent of people, at this point.

We would like to think it's some rare thing.

But it's pretty much everybody who looks at this. And doesn't seem to be spending any time to make this instigation.

Decision was made for them, years ago, decades ago, and they're going and checking the boxes.

Yes. He has mean tweets. But you had a job. We had a country. I mean, yeah. But I know those mean tweets are really, really horrible.

Biden FAILED to do THIS While Calling Out Violent College Protests
RADIO

Biden FAILED to do THIS While Calling Out Violent College Protests

President Biden spoke quickly to the press about the pro-Palestine protests that have taken over college campuses. But while Biden covered the basics — how Americans have a right to protest, but not protest violently, how antisemitism is bad, and how the rule of law should be upheld — did he go far enough? Glenn and Stu don’t believe so. Biden had an opportunity to make a real impact, but instead, he said enough to save his own skin and satisfy some supporters…and he also threw in a few lines to pander to the violent mobs...

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: Can we pull one of these?

BIDEN: Must be upheld. We're not an authoritarian nation. Where we silence people and squash dissent. The American people are heard. In fact, peaceful protest is the best tradition of how Americans respond to conflict issues. But -- but neither are we a lawless country. We are a civil society, and order must prevail.

Throughout our history, we have often faced moments like this, because we are a big, diverse, free thinking and freedom-loving nation. In moments like this, there are always those who rush in to score political points. But this isn't a moment for politics. It's a moment for clarity. So let me be clear: Peaceful protests in America, violent protest is not protected. Peaceful protest is.

It's against the law, when violence occurs. Destroying property is not a peaceful protest. It's against the law. Vandalism, trespassing, breaking windows, shutting down campuses, forcing the cancellation of classes and ground school. None of this is a peaceful protest.

Threatening people, intimidating people, instilling fear in people is not peaceful protest. It's against the law.

Dissent is essential to democracy. But dissent must never lead to disorder or to deny the rights of others so students can finish the semester and their college education.

Look, it's a basically a matter of fairness. It's a matter of what is right.

Does the right to protest, but not the right to cause chaos.

People have the right to get an education. The right to get a degree.

The right to walk across the campus safely without fear of being attacked.

Let's be clear about this as well: There should be no place in any campus, no place in America, for anti-Semitism or threats of violence against Jewish students.

There is no place for hate speech, or violence of any kind. Whether it's anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab-Americans or Palestinian Americans. It's simply wrong. There's no place for racism in America. It's all wrong.

It's un-American.

I understand people have strong feelings and deep convictions, and in America, we respect the right and protect the right for them to express that. But it doesn't mean anything goes. It needs to be done without violence, without destruction. Without hate. And within the law.

You know, make no mistake, as president I will always defend free speech, I will always be just as a strong on standing up for freedom of the law. That's my responsibility to you, the American people. My obligation to the Constitution.

GLENN: Oh, my gosh.

BIDEN: Thank you very much.
GLENN: Okay. So there you go. You have Joe Biden doing --

STU: You want to take questions? He might be taking a question soon.

VOICE: Have the protests forced you to reconsider any of the policies with regards to the region?
BIDEN: No.

GLENN: And he walks away.

VOICE: Mr. President, do you think the National Guard should intervene?

BIDEN: No.

GLENN: He's walking away, and the door is closing behind him.

STU: But he's still answering them. No. No.

GLENN: He's just in a -- no. In the hallway. He's in his bedroom. No.

He looks at his wife, she says no. I know. What's happening.

STU: What did you make of that? It was pretty Milquetoast, boring. Not much.

We were talking about this off the air, that he had an actual opportunity here, if he wanted to win over a good chunk of the country, while risking his far left flank, of kind of having the clichéd Sister Souljah moment, who is really harsh against these people are doing what they're doing.

STU: He did not do that. It may have been what he was trying to do. He's seemingly incapable of giving a speech of any value.

That was a -- that was a -- just a -- hey.

GLENN: I think it's enough to satisfy many supporters. We're also at --

STU: What kind of supporters. Like, what group is he targeting that? Like a liberal, maybe Jewish voter?

GLENN: Yeah. And not really.

I think he's kind of pissed off the Jews when he's like, and no place for anti-Semitism.

Or people wanted to hurt Hamas. And Palestinians. And Muslims. And those who are in the Mickey Mouse Club.

STU: Right.

GLENN: The ones who have been raped by the Disney corporation. Which we're totally fine with.

You know, I -- I don't think he -- he reached out to -- to those supporters. But I think he did enough for maybe the average person who is a Democrat. And wants him tolerance the right thing.

What -- okay.

STU: He said, no violence.

He said protests are okay. But no violence. And such. And there's some group, he connects with that. There was a chance for him to really set this issue. Maybe make it a strength, and not a weakness. And he did not do that there. That was -- he could have made a moment of like, look.

These people on these campuses are -- basically, calling them revolting. Passion. Some sort of anger toward the people who are calling for the genocide of Jews. There's none of that. Well, to make sure people can get to classes. You know, everyone has a right to get a degree. Which, by the way, they don't have a right to.

But all of that being said, it wasn't the worst thing I've ever seen out of his mouth.

At least he didn't have red villain lighting behind him.

GLENN: Well, you know what is great though?

He doesn't need that anymore.

STU: We looked into his character.

It's funny too, he's -- from a dramatic standpoint, you couldn't put Joe Biden in like a dramatic movie. Because he's so bad at these speeches.

Even if he says something evil, you're just like, oh, God. This sucks.

GLENN: I think that we should bring the guillotine back. And we should take all bankers. And we should cut their heads off.

STU: Right. They're so -- there's no emotion.

You go back to the Star Wars, like, you know, this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause speech.

You need to be -- you can't put him in a movie. Everyone would be like, wait. What?

Is he talking about hamburgers? What is he talking?

GLENN: And the rebels are taking our bases, and we must stop for the empire!

STU: Right.

Yeah.

GLENN: And taking -- and we --

STU: Cough three times in the middle of a sentence.

GLENN: My uncle was in a spaceship once. He was flanked by aliens.

STU: And we -- isn't it just -- can we at least agree with this. Democrats, Republicans, everybody across the aisle. This is embarrassing. Can we at least just agree on that point. You can still say his policies are better or whatever. People around him. Making the policies, have a better idea, running the country.

Aren't you just embarrassed by this, day after day after take.

It is utterly depressing. That the country that has led the world out of the lack of Silicon Valleyization has this dolt running it.

It's so pathetic. In every way.

GLENN: So you are -- you're -- you're drawing a lot more out of this speech than I did.

I don't think it was bad. I don't think it was good.

But I don't think -- that's not going to make any impact. One way or another.

STU: I don't know that we disagree. I think he had an opportunity for impact, which he did not take. He could have made it worse. I don't think he did it that. I just think he's such an uninspiring figure. And I'm embarrassed when we're led by somebody like that. When I said led, it's definitely in air quotes there. I don't know the president should be viewed this way. But the way we view the president. He just sucks. It's maybe not even deeper than that.

He just sucks at that. He's not good at thing he does. The job he does, he's incapable of doing.

And that's a little bit frustrating for a world superpower.

GLENN: Yes. Again, now I think you're going too soft.

He doesn't -- he's not just incapable of doing it. The guy is a box of matches, in a fireworks factory.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: And he's constantly striking himself.

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: What happened?

What happened?

STU: Yeah.

GLENN: He's constantly setting everything on firepower.

STU: Yeah. But I don't think -- that speech didn't strike me as, hey. Keep going protesters. It wasn't that.

GLENN: No. Which again, if he was some ideological maniac, maybe he would have gone that way.

Elizabeth Warren would have done that. Elizabeth wash would have been like, burn these things to the ground.

Probably. I think. He didn't quite do that.

He went out there, with the idea of, people are criticizing me for not saying anything.

I have to say something. I can say, hey, free speech is good. Don't break the law everybody.

But step back, and probably at this point, what is it? 10:00 a.m. dinner.

And then the day is over. That's what it felt like. And that's the way it feels like all the time with this guy, even when he's doing things that are viscerally angry about -- I mean, he's overcoming the entire system of government with things like the student loan plan. And he does it the same way.

He looks as boring and terrible and awful and coughing in the million dollars of sentences. That he does every other speech.

And, you know, watching him.

It's funny too.

Because he's obviously been told. Hey, if you can avoid coughing in the middle of a sentence.

Can you do that?

Multiple times, he went to cough.

He catches himself. And his hand stays a foot away from. He brings it up.

He starts to cough.

He realizes, he's not supposed to do it.

He doesn't have to cough. He's doing it as a tick. I don't know what he's doing -- and he also does this little scratch his face thing in the million dollars. Jews shouldn't be so murdered all the time.

GLENN: You're making fun of --

STU: Whatever the hell he was saying. I don't know. I just feel like it's an embarrassment from beginning to end. I'm sorry, you didn't feel that way. I'm sorry you like President Biden and you will vote for him. That's not how I feel. And I have to express it. As he said, free speech is important.

REPUBLICANS Just Passed a HATE SPEECH Bill Under the Guise of “Antisemitism”
RADIO

REPUBLICANS Just Passed a HATE SPEECH Bill Under the Guise of “Antisemitism”

The House of Representatives just passed a bill to combat “antisemitism” with the majority of both parties on board. But there’s one big problem with the bill: It’s not an “antisemitism” bill, Glenn says. It’s a hate speech bill. Glenn explains why, although he’s been accused of defending Jews TOO MUCH, he’s “dead set against” this bill: “The only one who can remove the hate in someone's heart is God. Government can't fix human hearts.” Glenn also explains why constitutionalists must defend the pro-Palestinian protesters’ right to free speech — not violence — no matter how despicable it is.

Transcript

Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors

GLENN: The House of Representatives passed a major anti-Semitism bill on Wednesday. Which would crack down on anti-Semitism on college campuses, as protests raged nationwide. So you're now not saying that this is going to be for everybody. This is just through the Department of Education.

Legislation was opposed by 21 Republicans and 70 Democrats. The legislation seeks to make the Department of Education adopt the international Holocaust remembrance alliances. Definition of anti-Semitism, when enforcing the 1964 Civil Rights Act on college campuses. Now, I had to look it up. What is the international Holocaust remembrance alliances definition of anti-Semitism?

Well, they define anti-Semitism as, and I'm quoting. A certain perception of Jews. Which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews.

It also defines it as a heretical and physical manifestation of anti-Semitism, and directed towards your or non-Jewish individuals, and/or their property.

Towards the Jewish community, institutions, and religious facilities.

Examples of anti-Semitism include calling for the harming of the Jewish people, in the name of racial or extremist view of religion. And accusing Jewish people of inventing and/or exaggerating the Holocaust. The combat, anti-Semitism movement hailed the passage as a momentous achievement. And said, works remains to be done to get it through the Senate and President Joe Biden's desk. While we celebrate this milestone. Our work is far from over. We now need to urgently call upon Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to prioritize the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. Okay.

So there are the 20 Republicans in the House, that stood up. Florida representative, Matt Gaetz, opposed the bill. He said, this is a hate speech bill.

Anti-Semitism is wrong. But the legislation is written without regard for the Constitution, common sense, or even common understanding of the meaning of the words. If this bill would pass, the gospel itself would meet the definition of anti-Semitism under the terms of this bill. Democratic lawmakers including hoist minority leader, Hakeem Jeffries has also called for the passage of the bill. The countering anti-terrorism act. Or anti-Semitism act. The bill would combat anti-Semitism through the appointment of a new presidential adviser, that would be charged with implementing the White House's coordinated strategy in dealing with anti-Semitism.

What could possibly go wrong here?

The effort to crush anti-Semitism and hatred in any form, is not a democratic or Republican issue. It's an American issue that must be addressed in a bipartisan manner with a fierce urgency of now! Because after all, gang, say it with me. We've got to do something.

Okay. You know, when I hear people say, the Jews killed Jesus. Or those dirty Jews run the world.

Or those Jews are responsible for everything bad. Or you're just saying things because you have a Zionist master. I think to myself, you're a bloody idiot.

You have no clue, as to what is really happening in the world.

You have no clue. Are there some Jewish people, and top of corporations, or top of whatever?

Yeah. Yeah. There are. Are there very successful Jews that happen to be bankers?

Yeah. But, you know what, there's also very successful bankers that are Catholics and Mormons. And Lutherans, and Methodists. And dare I say it, atheists.

Yeah, but it's the Jews that are the problem.

You're an idiot. You shouldn't run around saying these things. But I kind of actually like it, when you do.

Because I know exactly who you are. Oh. Here's a guy who is so stupid, he can't tie his own shoes. Or he's just a massive racist.

Kids, stay away from him. You shouldn't run around saying, because it's false, it's rude. It's stupid.

All of the above. And we're trying to create a society here. The proper response to this act is to not post memes of long-nosed Jews, wrapping their tentacles around a US flag. It doesn't mean you're right about how the Jews are. Or vindicated for noticing that Zionists are the reason for everything bad, that it's ever happened.

You can say those things. You can say those things. Because our Constitution guarantees it.

You know how I feel about anti-Semitism.

You know how I feel about the Holocaust. And the return of the Holocaust. I've been warning about it.

I've been trying to prepare you for this time. I've prepared my family for this time. Hard choices are going to come soon.

They already are. This one doesn't seem hard. What have I always said?

The Constitution must rule. The Constitution must be our set of principles, that we do not violate. No matter, if it cuts your way or against you.
This -- this act, you would think, that someone like me, that is very supportive of the Jews in Israel, would be all for.

I am dead set against this.

And you should be too. Something can be legally permissible, and morally repulsive at the same time.

Speech needs to be protected. Not the stuff we all agree on. But the stuff we don't agree on.

The only speech that needs protection is the speech that a lot of people, the majority find absolutely abhorrent.

Congress doesn't understand. You cannot legislate hatred away. You can't pass a bill. You know what happens?

All you do is you create speakeasies of hate. They go into the closet. They go into another room, where they can't be heard. And it just becomes a festering pool of hate.

That at some point, will break out.

The only one that can remove hatred from hearts is God. We can do our part.

Does that mean that jerk protesters can prevent Jewish students from entering their classroom. No. That's not speech.

In the public square, and I mean that electronically as well, those who are standing up, and, quite honestly, spreading the lies about the Palestinians in Hamas. And saying, no. They're not.

They're good. They're great. There's not a problem there. As much as it kills me to say it, I stand with them on freedom of speech only.

The people who voted for this bill, I'm sure it was well-intended. But they're misguided by human nature itself.

Governments cannot fix human hearts. They are also -- they should all be sent back to some remedial class on the principles of the Constitution of America.

The importance of freedom of speech. The importance of not rushing in to do something, because it's scary right now.

No!

No. Why is it, this Congress can only pass the things, that seemingly only hurt the strength of America. And on me cut across the Constitution.

You just took away our Fourth Amendment right for warrants.

You just took that away, you're now -- you're now just passed another bill, that is bringing people -- who have escaped Gaza. And are Palestinians. Remember, 97 percent of them, in the latest poll, hate America.

About 70 percent of them, were all for Hamas. In the 80 percentile range of supporting October 7th.

Congress, you just passed a bill, that are bringing those people in. To America!

And settling them here in America. What the hell is wrong with you?

You live in the upside down world, I don't.

I still live in the world where the -- where America is all about protected rights. It's a dark day, when only 20 -- only 20 people in Congress that are Republican will stand up against this bill. It is a dark, dark day!